The present invention relates to container-carrying railroad freight cars, and in particular relates to container-supporting structures located in the corners of a container well of such a railroad car unit.
Railroad cars including deep side sills defining container wells have been used for a number of years to carry intermodal cargo containers stacked in two tiers, with a pair of short containers loaded end-to-end in the container well, or a standard container such as a 40-foot long container carried in the well, and with a second-tier container at least 40 feet long carried on top of the container or containers in the well. Such cargo containers are built to a standard width, typically 8 feet, which must be accommodated between the side sills of the car that define the container well.
The containers in the well are supported at each end of the well by container support structures that, in one type of container car, have previously been built in the form of weldments of cut and bent steel plate welded to the lower portions of the side sills of the car. Such cargo container support structures have been undesirably expensive to build because of the amount of skilled labor required to weld the various parts together. Such welded assemblies also include surfaces that are difficult to reach for cleaning and preservation of the metal during the life of such a car. Some of the welds required to assemble the previously utilized cargo container support assemblies have been located where welds of the required quality are difficult to accomplish, and production costs are consequently higher than is desired.
What is desired, then, is an improved container carrying railroad freight car in which cargo container support structures are less expensive, more reliable, and lighter in weight than the previously utilized fabricated container support assemblies.
At least partially answering the desire for an improved railcar and cargo container support structure mentioned above, the cargo container support structures of the railroad freight car disclosed herein are at least partially of cast metal construction, as defined by the appended claims.
In one embodiment of the present invention a base portion of a container support structure is a unitary casting including reinforcing ribs on a lower side and having a container-carrying upper body portion.
In one embodiment of the base portion of a cargo container support structure as disclosed herein, reinforcing ribs extend along the underside of a horizontal upper body portion of the base, providing ample strength and stiffness of the base without the need for welding to build the reinforcing portions of the base.
In one embodiment of the cargo container support structures disclosed herein a tower of cast metal is welded to the case metal base, and the tower and the base are both welded to a side sill of a container well portion of a railroad freight car.
It is a feature of one embodiment of the container support that the tower portion includes one or more horizontal internal ribs.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings which form a part of the disclosure herein, a multi-unit container well car 20 shown in
A conventional coupler 32 mounted on the end unit 22 permits the multi-unit container well car 20 to be coupled to other railcars, and a wheeled truck 34 carries the conventional coupler end 33 of the end unit 22, whose body bolster 36 is carried conventionally atop the truck 34. Each of the units 22 and 24 of the well car 20 includes a container well 38 and can carry two or more intermodal freight containers, such as two nominal 20-foot containers 40 or one 40-foot container (not shown) carried within the container well 38, and a 45-foot container 42 stacked atop the 20-foot containers 40 in each of the container well car units 22 and 24.
The container well 38 is defined within each well car unit 22 or 24, as may be seen with respect to the end unit 22 in
Mounted on the side sills 44 and 46, at each end of the container well 42, are container support structures 52 and 54, located at respective corners of the container well to support the containers carried by the particular unit of the multi-unit car. The respective container support structures 52 and 54, located as shown in
A bottom truss assembly 56 extends horizontally between the side sills 44 and 46 at the bottom of the container well 38 to provide lateral support at the bottom of each of the side sills 44 and 46 and act as emergency source of containment for a failed container 38.
As shown in greater detail in
The container support tower 60 is located beneath the intermediate end body bolster 48, as may be seen best in
Referring to
The container support tower 74 is located beneath the container placement guide 50 at the conventional coupler end 33 of the car unit 22, as shown in
Referring next to
Extending diagonally upward and outboard from an outboard lateral margin 84 of the top face 82 is a mounting flange 86 that includes a vertical upper portion 88. An upwardly open channel 89 is defined between the mounting flange 86 and the longitudinal support plate 62, and the lower portion of the side sill 44 is received in the channel 89. The thickness of the vertical upper portion 88 of the mounting flange 86 may be less than the thickness of the lower, diagonal portion thereof and of the horizontal upper body portion 80, in order to avoid unnecessary weight. A top margin 90 of the mounting flange 86 extends horizontally and is welded to the outer plate 92 of the side sill 44. In the embodiment shown, the horizontal upper body portion 80 has a length 91 of about 17⅜ inches, while the mounting flange 86 has a length 93 of about 23 inches, along its vertical upper portion 88, in order to distribute the loads carried by cargo container support structures 52 and 54 over a large area of the side sill 44 or 46 of the well car unit 22.
An L-shaped load distribution plate 94 which may be made of steel is welded to the top face 82 to contact the corner casting 68 and thus to apply vertical loads, imposed on the container carrying portion 64 by the bottom corner casting 68 of a container 40, close to the container support tower 60 and the longitudinal support plate 62 or a corresponding portion of an integrally cast base 58.
While a container support tower of a container support structure 52 or 54 including a cast base 58 or 72 may be made as a weldment of formed steel plate, as shown in
In the container support tower 60 as shown a pair of reinforcing ribs 106 and 108, cast integrally with the walls 98, 100, and 102, extend horizontally inward from the walls at respective intermediate positions along the height of the tower 60. That is, the reinforcing rib 106 is spaced upwardly above the bottom of the tower 60 and the top face 82 of the base 58, and the upper reinforcing rib 108 is located between the guide plate 104 and the lower rib 106, as may be seen in
As may be seen by reference to
The container support base 58 incorporates reinforcing portions, including a pair of ribs 122, 124 that extend longitudinally along the underside of the horizontal upper body portion 80, as seen best in
A shorter rib 126 extends transversely, parallel with and beneath the bottom of the laterally extending wall 100 of the tower 60, and is interconnected at its ends with the longitudinally extending ribs 122 and 124. Another shorter rib 128 may extend transversely between the longitudinal, longer, ribs 122 and 124 at a location centrally beneath the container stacking cone 70, reinforcing the container carrying portion 64 of the container support base 58, as may also be seen in
The several components of the left-hand container support structure 54 are shown in exploded view in
By constructing the container support structures 52 and 54 with at least the bases 58 and 72 made as castings, and with the towers 60 and 74 optionally also as castings or even as a casting integral with the bases, significant savings in labor costs can be effected, without adding to the weight of a complete railroad car including such cargo container support structures 52 and 54 and without sacrificing load bearing characteristics of the container support structures 52 and 54. There are fewer and simpler welds to be made in assembling the container support assemblies 52 and 54 and no greater difficulty in mounting the container support structures 52 and 54 onto the side sill structures 44 and 46 of a well car than with the container support assembly previously fabricated of welded plate steel.
Many of the advantages of the structures disclosed above are still available in container support structures 52 and 54 incorporating the tower 130 of formed plate steel shown in
As in the tower 60 an outboard margin 146 of the wall 134, an outboard margin 148 of the guide plate 140, and an outboard margin 150 of the wall 136 would fit against a planar portion of the inner plate 118 of the side sill 44. Lower outboard margins 152 and 154 would fit against the longitudinal support plate 62, leaving its outboard face 116 coplanar with the outboard margins 146, 148, and 150, so as to fit against the inner plate 118.
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2194356 | Eklund | Mar 1940 | A |
2327585 | Ulrich | Aug 1943 | A |
2504112 | Dean et al. | Apr 1950 | A |
3389663 | Gutridge | Jun 1968 | A |
3520256 | Gutridge | Jul 1970 | A |
3659724 | Miller et al. | May 1972 | A |
4064947 | Cole | Dec 1977 | A |
4091742 | Cordiani | May 1978 | A |
4331083 | Landregan et al. | May 1982 | A |
4599949 | Hill | Jul 1986 | A |
4624188 | Kaleta | Nov 1986 | A |
4703699 | Hill | Nov 1987 | A |
4771706 | Lindauer et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4782762 | Johnstone et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4784548 | Butcher et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4802420 | Butcher et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807722 | Jamrozy et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4841876 | Gramse et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4862810 | Jamrozy et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876968 | Lindauer et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4889055 | Jamrozy et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4893567 | Hill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4905608 | Terlecky et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4909157 | Jamrozy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4911082 | Richmond | Mar 1990 | A |
4951575 | Dominguez et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5054403 | Hill et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5170718 | Hill et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5279230 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5423269 | Saxton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5465670 | Butcher | Nov 1995 | A |
5501556 | Butcher | Mar 1996 | A |
5520489 | Butcher et al. | May 1996 | A |
5730063 | Forbes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743191 | Coslovi | Apr 1998 | A |
5749686 | Butcher et al. | May 1998 | A |
6003445 | Coslovi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6196137 | Forbes | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6505564 | Khattab | Jan 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3711409 | Oct 1987 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070261593 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |