The invention concerns containers for various products, and in particular relates to containers with molded plastic, threaded closures for products such as powdered concentrates that require a scoop.
Protein powders, weight gain formulas, weight loss formulas, vitamin and mineral supplement powders and similar products are usually sold in containers with plastic threaded closures. These are often relatively large-mouth containers, often 110 mm or 120 mm in diameter. Powdered products that are for mixing by the consumer into water or other liquid beverages often are sold with a scoop, a simple plastic device placed directly in the container with the powdered product. Even if placed on the top surface of the powdered product, the scoop will work its way down into the powder during shipping, and therefore the consumer must retrieve the scoop by hand, reaching into the powder, which produces a messy and objectionable situation.
There have been some approaches to this problem. In one approach, a powdered baby formula container, non-threaded, had a closure secured to the container in a normal way but the closure had an upper part to house a scoop. For access to the scoop the closure was swung upwardly on a hinge. The powdered contents were sealed into the container, with a liner secured to the upper rim of the non-threaded container. See U.S. Published Application No. 2008/0156808.
A simpler and more efficient way of storing a scoop separate from a powdered or liquid concentrate product is needed, especially for threaded closures and for the case in which products are for human consumption.
In addition to the above published application, the following patents and publications show prior approaches to storing a scoop or utensil in or adjacent to a cap, sometimes to prevent the utensil from being submerged in the contained product: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,175,041, 5,705,212, 5,415,309, 5,090,572, 4,216,875, 3,679,093, 3,624,787, D572,538, U.S. pub. No. 2008/0093366, Japan pub. app. Nos. 2007-137510, 2004-315068, 2000-287807, 2000-107052 and Great Britain pub. app. No. 2 250 271.
Of the above patents and publications, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,705,212 and 7,175,041 show storage and retention of a utensil or scoop within some form of cap. In the former the utensil is in a snapped-on, non-threaded overcap; in the latter the scoop is held up against the top panel inside a deep threaded cap.
In several embodiments of this invention a scoop is retained in a container, adjacent to a container closure so as not to be submerged in the product. In one form of the invention, the scoop is held directly inside the container and up against the liner, which is initially assembled into the cap. For example, the scoop can be held in place on the liner by a glue dot, until removed by the consumer.
In another embodiment of the invention the mouth of the container is formed to support the scoop. This can be a channel, slot, lip or ridge formed on the inside surface of the plastic container mouth, such that the scoop, which extends across the interior of the bottle finish, does not interfere with the engagement of the container closure or the seal.
In all cases of a granulated or powdered product, the consumer, after opening the container, can simply place the scoop on the top surface of the powder between uses. The problem of objectionable sinking down into the powder occurs only during shipment.
In some embodiments, promotional materials can be retained in the container, along with the scoop or alternative to the scoop.
It is therefore among the objects of the invention to conveniently store a scoop of the type used for powder or liquid concentrates within a container of the product, or to store another article, in such a way that the article will not sink down into the product. These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment, considered along with the accompanying drawings.
In
A scoop 10 is held within the basket 26, as shown.
In the variation shown in
As shown in
The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/322,175, filed Jan. 28, 2009.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3624787 | Newman | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3679093 | Chang | Jul 1972 | A |
| 4216875 | Stanish | Aug 1980 | A |
| 5005719 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5090572 | DeRoseau | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5251774 | Engle | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5415309 | Wang | May 1995 | A |
| 5705212 | Atkinson | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5706974 | Murdick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5749460 | Rice | May 1998 | A |
| 5915585 | Ladina et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6216856 | Park | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6604645 | Vaupotic | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6604646 | Torniainen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 7175041 | Ekkert | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| D572538 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2008 | S |
| D576035 | Perry et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
| D578401 | Perry et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
| D599617 | Ye | Sep 2009 | S |
| 7947928 | Tynes et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8042704 | Borowski et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8087530 | Stevens | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8210381 | Cross | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8469223 | Perry et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 20010045374 | Selker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20040094548 | Laveault | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20070102061 | Tsao | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080041861 | Crawford et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080093366 | McKahan et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156808 | Perry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2250271 | Jun 1992 | GB |
| 2000107052 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000287807 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2004315068 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2007137510 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12322175 | Jan 2009 | US |
| Child | 12653734 | US |