The present invention relates to containers with structural ribs to resist deformation due to internal or external forces. More particularly, the present invention relates to beverage containers, such as bottles, having non-continuous ribs formed in their peripheral surfaces to resist deformation due to internal or external pressures.
Various containers are used to package liquids, such as pressurized (e.g., carbonated) and unpressurized beverages. A commonly-used container is a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle, which has been manufactured in various shapes and sizes. PET bottles are popular because they are inexpensive, lightweight, impervious to many gases and liquids and can be readily shaped into various designs and sizes. However, unlike containers formed of more rigid materials such as glass, PET containers can readily deform at low internal or external pressures, especially when the containers are thin-walled.
Certain PET containers or bottles have been designed with continuous ribs in order to provide some rigidity. However, although these ribs may perform satisfactorily when subject to moderate external pressures, they can readily deform when subjected to internal pressures, such as from the carbonation in certain beverages (50-100 psi). For example, certain containers for bottled water are provided with continuous ribs at the label panel area. Although the bottles are formed of relatively thin PET to lighten their weight, the continuous ribs add structural support at the area to be grasped by the consumer. That is, even though the containers are thin-walled, the pressure exerted by a consumer's grasping will not deform the containers because of the reinforcement provided by the continuous ribs. However, in some instances these water bottles are pressurized, such as by the addition of liquid nitrogen (up to about 40 psi), in order to survive distribution. It has been found, however, that this internal pressure tends to deform the continuous ribs over time. In some instances, the bottles would deform so as to “wash out” the continuous ribs. Improvements of this design have been attempted, such as by providing the continuous ribs with fillet radii. These modifications have achieved moderate success, but have not satisfactorily prevented deformation due to internal pressure.
Discontinuous ribs have also been proposed for plastic bottles for certain applications. U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,037 describes a plastic bottle that includes vacuum panels and reinforced bands above and below the vacuum panels. This particular bottle is for use in a “hot fill” application in which liquids are stored and sealed in the container while hot to provide adequate sterilization. The containers are typically filled under slight positive pressure and at temperatures approaching the boiling point of water when capped. However, cooling of the liquid product in the bottle usually creates negative internal pressure, which can partially collapse the bottle. Accordingly, the bottles are provided with six circumferentially spaced apart vacuum panels 3 in a central area to be covered by a label. When the volume of the hot product inside of the bottle shrinks during cooling, the faces of the vacuum panels are drawn inwardly to compensate for the reduction in pressure and prevent deformation of the other parts of the bottle. In addition, cylindrical bands 6 are disposed above and below the region of the vacuum panels 3. These bands 6 are formed of one or two circumferential hoop ribs 7, each made up of six recessed rib sections 8. These ribs provide hoop reinforcement to ensure completely cylindrical surfaces above and below the region of the vacuum panels, to which a label can be adhered. However, these circumferential hoop ribs are for compensating against negative internal pressure in conjunction with the vacuum panels and are not designed for providing against positive internal pressure.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a lightweight container having acceptable sidewall rigidity.
It is further an object of the present invention to provide a container having acceptable sidewall rigidity and being able to withstand internal pressure without unacceptable deformation.
It is a further object to decrease the weight of a container without sacrificing container performance and customer acceptance.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a container having structural elements that can have an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
According to one aspect, the present invention relates to a container including a shell having a top section, a bottom section and a central section connecting the top section and the bottom section. At least a majority region of the central section is provided with a plurality of structural ribs about its periphery, the ribs being discontinuous in a circumferential direction extending around the central section.
According to another aspect, the present invention relates to a container including a shell having a top section, a bottom section and a central section connecting the top section and the bottom section. At least a majority region of the central section is provided with a plurality of structural ribs about its periphery, the ribs being discontinuous in a direction extending around the central section.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention relates to a container including a shell having a top section, a bottom section and a central section connecting the top section and said bottom section, and means for reinforcing the shell against external pressure and internal pressure.
A container according to a first embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Lower section 16 and upper section 12 have similar cross-sections, which are aligned vertically. In the depicted embodiment, central section 14 has a cross-section section of a lesser diameter than that of the upper and lower sections. However, the present invention is not limited to this embodiment and the upper, central and lower sections can have similar cross-sections.
Central section 14 is provided with a plurality of ribs 22 for structural support. In this embodiment, ribs 22 are in the form of axisymmetric indentations aligned in a plurality of rows throughout the central section. A horizontal land 24 is provided between each horizontally adjacent rib 22, such that the ribs are not continuous in the circumferential direction around the central section. In addition, vertical lands 26 are provided between each row of ribs. Although the ribbed region of central section 14 is most effective when it covers the entirety of the periphery of central section 14 as shown in
As shown in
Depending on the height of central region 14 of container 10 and depending on the applications for which the container is intended, the number of rows of ribs and the number and shape of the ribs vary. In the first embodiment, when used with a 0.5 liter bottle, 13 rows of ribs are provided, with 5 ribs in each row. Each rib is about 1.2 in. long and has a maximum depth of 0.04 in. Preferably, the ribs in one row are not aligned vertically with ribs in adjacent rows. As shown in
The container of the first embodiment provides both sufficient hoop stiffness or rigidity, that is, resistance to crushing by a side load, as well as sufficient resistance to deformation of the side wall due to internal pressure. For internal pressure, the fundamental design concept employed uses the idea that for a container under internal pressure, membrane (midplane) stresses develop in the walls, just like a balloon under pressure. In addition to these membrane stresses, there are also bending stresses that develop depending on the thickness of the shell. Thus, the total stress state due to internal pressure is a sum of the membrane (or midplane) as well as the bending stresses. The bending stresses usually influence the magnitude of the stress on the outside and inside surfaces of the container. In containers made from PET subject to internal pressure over long periods of time, it is critical that the midplane (or membrane) component of the stress state be minimized to eliminate creep rupture problems. This is incorporated in the rib design geometry and dimensions of this embodiment, wherein the parameters have been selected such that in a thin walled PET shell, midplane stresses are maintained below the yield strength of oriented and crystallized PET.
In addition, in this embodiment, because the hoop stiffness is sufficiently great, the thickness of the plastic forming the container can be reduced. In a typical PET bottle, the thickness of the plastic is approximately 0.012 in., but with the structure of the present invention the thickness of the plastic forming the bottle can be reduced to less than 0.010 in., at least in central section 14, and still maintain a comparable hoop stiffness. For example, in the graph of
It has been found with the structure according to the first embodiment, midplane and bending stresses are significantly reduced as compared with a conventional bottle with continuous ribs.
The arrangement of the ribs is not limited to that shown in the first embodiment. For example, in the container 100 shown in
The number, size and shape of the ribs can be modified to achieve the desired axial stiffness and external and internal pressure resistance. Depending on the intended application of a container being designed, the arrangement of the ribs can be designed accordingly.
The orientation of the ribs is also not limited to that shown in the first and second embodiments. That is, although the ribs are shown in the first and second embodiments to be parallel to the horizontal direction, they can be rotated up to 180°, relative to the horizontal direction and still achieve desired results. For example, in the container 200 shown in
In the container 300 of the fourth embodiment depicted in
As described above, the containers are preferably formed of PET, but can be formed of other materials including high- and low-density polyethylene, polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride, for example. PET containers are typically blow-molded. The blow-molding process is well-known to those in the art and it is considered unnecessary herein to explain the process in which a preform is blow-molded in a conventional manner.
While the present invention has been described as to what is currently considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to them. To the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/215,754 filed Jun. 30, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4024975 | Uhlig | May 1977 | A |
4863046 | Collette et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4912048 | Smith et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5002199 | Frahm | Mar 1991 | A |
5005716 | Eberle | Apr 1991 | A |
5054632 | Alberghini et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
D322562 | Narsutis | Dec 1991 | S |
5101990 | Krishnakumar et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5222615 | Ota et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5238129 | Ota | Aug 1993 | A |
5279433 | Krishnakumar et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5499730 | Harbour | Mar 1996 | A |
5598941 | Semersky et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5704504 | Bueno | Jan 1998 | A |
5709304 | Credle, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
5746339 | Petre et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758790 | Ewing, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810195 | Sim | Sep 1998 | A |
5887739 | Prevot et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890595 | Credle, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
D414112 | Waggaman et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
6036037 | Scheffer | Mar 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 446 352 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 839 731 | May 1998 | EP |
1558992 | Dec 1967 | FR |
2 161 133 | Jan 1986 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20010027978 A1 | Oct 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60215754 | Jun 2000 | US |