The invention concerns a container that is at least partially filled and closed, and manufactured in particular according to a blow-molding, filling and sealing process. A container body is at least partially filled. The end of the container body is at least partially closed through a head diaphragm and comprises a cap part with a sealing part. For removal of the container contents, the sealing part may be penetrated with a hollow, spike-shaped insertion part (“spike”) from the outside in an insertion direction with a predeterminable actuating force. The insertion part may be removed again with a predeterminable retraction force in an opposite retraction direction.
Containers that are made from plastic according to the Blow-Fill-Seal (BFS) method, which is also known as the Bottelpack® method, are widely used for medical purposes, for example in form of infusion bottles. Such containers are particularly suitable for medical applications because the filling material comes only into contact with a polymer. Containers of this kind are prior art. U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,365, for example, describes a container of this kind. To ensure that the usability of such containers in medical operations is simple and safe, the sealing part must provide a secure seal during and after insertion with the insertion part of an infusion device, which is described by way of example in EN 8536-4.
Two further requirements, which are contradictory in principle, must be met simultaneously. First, that the insertion force is kept as low as possible. Second, the retraction of the insertion part is only possible against suitably high retraction forces. High retaining forces or good grip must be ensured to provide the patient with a certain level of mobility during the often lengthy process of infusion administration so that the patient is able to move freely without interrupting the infusion by unintentionally pulling out the infusion device. According to the standard ISO 15759:2006, the retaining force of the infusion device, therefore, must not be less than 15 N. This standard, on the other hand, permits insertion forces of up to 80 N.
The attempt to provide a sufficiently high retaining force by accepting a high insertion force is not practical because high insertion forces cannot be achieved by the nursing staff, especially when wearing gloves. These contradictory requirements, that is, easy to insert but difficult to retract, can also not be met by other simple measures such as arrow-shaped insertion parts with undercuts or barbs since this shape could lead to leakage of the sealing part. Also, such geometrical shape of the insertion part violates the applicable standard EN ISO 8536-4:2013.
Known sealing caps, such as are described in DE 10 2004 051 300 B3, EP 1 457 429 B1 and WO 2014/114685 A1, for example, do not meet the above-described, in principle contradictory, requirements. These documents propose to use a hollow stopper to make the tapping easier. DE 10 2004 051 300 B3 depicts recesses in the elastomer for the insertion spike that are oriented to the outside on one side. EP 1 457 429 B1 and WO 2014/114685 A1 describe that recesses for the insertion spike are provided in the elastomer on one side, oriented towards the container side. There is no apparent mechanism that would increase the retaining force. As FIG. 2 of WO 2014/114685 A1 shows, the retraction of the insertion spike is made rather easier than more difficult through a special funnel-shaped gradation.
With regard to the above problem, an object of the invention to provide an improved container of the kind described at the outset, which meets these two requirements for the application of the container in a special way.
This object is basically met according to the invention by a container having a device that makes the removal of the insertion part more difficult. The retraction force is increased to such an extent that an inadvertent removal of the insertion part is at least made more difficult. The insertion force is not increased by this device.
In particularly advantageous exemplary embodiments a sealing part, which is a component of the device that makes the removal of the insertion part more difficult, is provided in a cap part of the container body in such a way that, when the sealing part, which is a component of the device, is penetrated, a radial distance is provided between a through-hole in the cap part and the insertion part that was introduced. Also, at least when the insertion part is removed from the container in retraction direction, the radial distance is at least partially packed by the sealing part, which is a further component of the device and which applies at least an increased frictional force on the insertion part, at least in certain sections, during its retraction from the container. Through the displacement of the sealing part material caused by the retraction movement and the filling of the radial distance, a friction and compression zone is formed at the through-hole in the cap part, which impedes the retraction movement.
The through-hole in the cap part may, in conjunction with the outer circumference of the introduced insertion part, advantageously delimit an annular duct. When retrieving the insertion part from the container, the annular duct is completely packed to the surroundings by this further part of the device under formation of a bead-shaped projection that, being jammed in the annular duct, applies an additional clamping force onto the insertion part.
In a particularly advantageous manner, the sealing part is a preferably soft, elastomeric material. The sealing part extends between the cap part and a head diaphragm of a head part of the container, and is preferably provided with a recess at the end that is facing away from head diaphragm of the head part.
In advantageous exemplary embodiments, the sealing part is provided, at its end that faces the head diaphragm of the head part of the container, with a further sealing ring-shaped geometry that is an axially protruding extension of its recess in the direction of the head diaphragm. The geometry can brace itself, at least during the inserting of the insertion part, in a sealing manner against the upper end of the head diaphragm of the container facing it. This structure forms a further seal at the head diaphragm that surrounds the perforation.
The through-hole of the cap part may be covered with respect to the surroundings by a removable strap, a foil or similar member so as to provide a secure cover over the sealing part when the container is stored prior to its use. The following describes mostly embodiments with a strap. However, they may be implemented equally well with a foil.
The cap part, which is preferably made form a rigid plastic material, may be attached to a collar of the container below its head part.
The cap part may advantageously be provided with a second, separate sealing part, for example a sealing part for cannula passage. This second sealing part may be made from a different material than the first one sealing part and/or may have a different geometric shape, and thus, may be easily adapted to the application. The container is therefore suitable for multiple applications, for example the possibility of introducing an additive by piercing the second sealing element, for example by an injection cannula.
The subject of the invention is also a cap part, which is provided for a container according to the invention.
Other objects, advantages and salient features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the drawings, discloses preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Referring to the drawings that form a part of this disclosure:
The
The
On the side of the strap 30, the sealing part 16 is provided with a continuous piercing diaphragm 24, which is penetrated during the removal action. At the side of the head diaphragm 8, the sealing part 16 is provided with a central recess 20, which is flush with the through-hole 18 and which is provided for an insertion part 22 of an infusion device (
The geometry, and in particular the diameter, of the through-hole 18 compared to the diameter of the insertion part 22 is chosen such that (see
It came as a surprise to realize that an easy removal of the strap 30, a small piercing force and an advantageous increase of the retraction force of the insertion part 22 is only achieved through the synergistic interaction of the following multiple factors:
This may be achieved, according to the invention, if
The reduction of the actuating force during insertion of the insertion part 22 is achieved through a particular embodiment of the sealing part 16. The diaphragm 24 is made either very thin or, for example, is weakened through slots or perforations.
As depicted, for example, in
The following examples (tests No. 1-No. 43) provide further explanations to the invention. Into cap parts 10 according to
To be able to measure piercing forces independent from the head diaphragm 8 of the container, the cap parts were not welded to the container but were tested without them.
The maximum penetration forces (insertion forces) and dynamic retaining forces (retraction forces) were determined, similar to the description in DIN ISO 15759, with a universal testing machine Class 1 according to ISO 7500-1 with unused, commercially available insertion parts similar to ISO 8536-4 from different manufacturers as well as with the reference mandrel according to DIN ISO 15759 Appendix I. They have three different external diameters (5.4 mm, 5.6 mm and 6.0 mm). The test speed was 200 mm per minute according to the standard EN ISO 15747:2012.
The results, which are average values from 5 to 10 measurements, are compiled in the following table. The fourth column (column D) of this table is calculated from the diameter at the through-hole 18 at the strap end, less the free internal diameter at the geometry 26 of sealing part 16.
Very advantageous ratios between retraction force A and insertion force E result, according to the invention, where the material for the sealing part has a hardness of between 30 and 40 Shore A, where the diameter of the through-hole in the cap part is between 6.2 mm and 6.8 mm, and where the difference D is at least 2.5 mm.
While various embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 000 048.4 | Jan 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/001425 | 12/13/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/127267 | 7/12/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3509879 | Bathish | May 1970 | A |
3905368 | Lewis, Jr. | Sep 1975 | A |
4501372 | Hansen | Feb 1985 | A |
4545497 | Martha, Jr. | Oct 1985 | A |
5025955 | Stenger | Jun 1991 | A |
5232109 | Tirrell et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5395365 | Weiler et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5678713 | Derksen | Oct 1997 | A |
5895383 | Niedospial, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
20020113033 | Claessens | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040112855 | Becker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20090054865 | Brandenburger | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110245796 | Brandenburger | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
197 54 625 | Jun 1999 | DE |
10 2004 051 300 | Nov 2005 | DE |
10 2014 003 501 | Apr 2015 | DE |
0 573 102 | Dec 1993 | EP |
1 457 429 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 955 964 | Aug 2008 | EP |
0176967 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2005087127 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2014114685 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Mar. 13, 2018 in International (PCT) Application No. PCT/EP2017/001425. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190225390 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |