Containers and materials with improved punctureability

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9657155
  • Patent Number
    9,657,155
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 23, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 23, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
The present description includes containers having an improved puncture design that can be punctured without substantial deformation of the container. Such containers are particularly suitable for use in preparing beverages using automatic machines, particularly those used for preparation of single serve beverages. Also provided are thermoplastic materials having improved punctureability for use in containers, containers for preparation of a beverage, and methods for preparing a beverage using such containers.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to the field of containers for preparation of beverages, especially coffee and tea. These containers commonly are referred to as cartridges, cups, capsules, or pods, and are particularly suitable for use in the preparation of a single-serve beverage.


In recent years, single-serve beverage machines have become popular in homes and businesses as a quick and convenient manner of brewing beverages. These machines generally brew coffee, tea, or other hot beverages through polymer containers that may have integral filters and are filled with coffee grinds, tea leaves, or other soluble products. Upon brewing of these products, the container may be easily discarded so that the machine is available for preparation of subsequent beverages. These containers thereby enable users to customize their beverages and also enjoy freshly brewed beverages quickly and easily.


Although convenient, existing containers used for the preparation of beverages have numerous drawbacks. For example, many commercially available containers are prepared using materials that are less easily recycled. This is due at least in part due to the structural characteristics that are required for these containers. For example, the containers must be sufficiently strong to permit puncturing of the base of the container without substantial deformation of the container. Thus, there exists a need for a structure that permits use of more easily recycled materials while still having sufficient structural integrity.


SUMMARY OF THE DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present description address the above-described needs by providing a container including a substantially circular base; a frustoconically shaped wall extending therefrom and defining a cavity therein; and a stacking shoulder which intersects and extends laterally from the wall. The base includes an annular support structure with a continuous puncture region therein, the continuous puncture region being sized and shaped to permit a puncture therein without interference and without substantial deformation of the container. The annular support structure desirably is positioned an effective distance from the edge of the base to increase the punctureability of the base in the continuous puncture region.


Also provided in embodiments herein are containers for preparation of a beverage using the above-described container and methods for preparing a beverage using such containers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side view of an embodiment of a container according to a first embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a bottom view the container illustrated in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a top view of the container illustrated in FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a forward lower perspective view of the container illustrated in FIG. 1.



FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B are schematic illustrations of a design that may be applied to the inner surface of a cup base according to embodiments.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional side view of an embodiment of the container illustrated in FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present application address the above-described needs by providing a container for preparation of a beverage. As used herein, the term “container” is synonymous with cartridges, cups, capsules, pods, and the like, that may be used in the preparation of a beverage.


The container generally comprises a cup-shaped container with a base and a frustoconically shaped sidewall defining an opening. In an embodiment, the base includes an annular support structure. A continuous puncture region disposed within the annular support structure is configured to permit the container base to be punctured in the continuous puncture region during the preparation of the beverage. The annular support structure desirably is positioned an effective distance from the edge of the base to increase the punctureability of the base in the continuous puncture region.


An exemplary embodiment of a container 10 is further illustrated in FIGS. 1-4. The container 10 comprises the base 12 and the frustoconically shaped sidewall 14 defining an opening 16. The sidewall 14 may include a radially outwardly protruding lip 18 surrounding the opening 16. In one aspect, the radially outwardly protruding lip 18 further comprises a stacking shoulder 19 that intersects and extends laterally from the sidewall 14.


The base 12 includes an annular support structure 20 with a continuous puncture region 22 therein. The annular support structure 20 desirably is positioned an effective distance away from the edge 24 of the base 12.


The continuous puncture region disposed inside the annular support structure 20 is configured to permit the puncture of the container base at any position in the continuous puncture region 22 during preparation of the beverage. Although the presently described embodiment of annular support structure 20 is an annular shape, other shapes also may be used (e.g., elliptical, triangular, square, hexagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, and the like), provided the structure does not interfere with puncturing of the base in the continuous puncture region 22 and is positioned an effective distance from the edge 24 of the base. Those skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that the annular shaped support structure is particularly suitable for defining a continuous puncture region that may be punctured at any position, thereby allowing the container to be positioned within the beverage machine without regard for the position of the puncture region.


In embodiments, the annular support structure may comprise more than one annular shape. For example, the annular support structure may comprise a first annular shape and a second annular shape positioned inside the first annular shape and outside the continuous puncture region. In embodiments, the first annular support structure and the second annular support structure have substantially the same dimensions (i.e., width and height). Those skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that the dimensions of the first annular support structure and second annular support structure may be different (i.e., different widths and the like).


Not wishing to be bound by any theory, the position of the annular support structure an effective distance from the edge of the base changes the mode of failure of the container and increases the rigidity of the base, thereby improving the punctureability of the base in the continuous puncture region. In exemplary embodiments, an effective distance from the edge of the base is from about 1 to about 10 mm, from about 1 to about 5 mm, from about 1.5 to about 2.5 mm, or from about 2.0 to about 2.5 mm. For example, in an embodiment the annular support structure may be positioned about 2.3 mm from the edge of the base.


In embodiments, the container further comprises an inner support structure on the base disposed in the center of the continuous puncture region, such that the continuous puncture region is positioned between the annular support structure and the inner support structure (FIG. 6). The inner support structure may be annular in shape similar to the annular support structure, although other shapes also may be used (e.g., circular, elliptical, triangular, square, hexagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, and the like), provided the shape of the inner support structure does not interfere with the ability to puncture the base in the continuous puncture region.


In embodiments, the container further comprises other features to facilitate the punctureability of the base in the continuous puncture region. For example, in an embodiment the container may include a feature in the inner surface of the base of the container. The feature may be effective to weaken the material of the base in the continuous puncture region during its puncture without sacrificing its strength, for example, by providing stress concentrators. Two exemplary embodiments of the feature are illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B, which illustrate the designs that may be imprinted in the inner surface of the base of the container. Other designs also may be used.


In an embodiment (FIG. 6), the container may be further characterized by the following mathematical relationship:

h=(R1−R)·tan(90−Φ)

wherein h is the height of the container from the base 12 to the stacking shoulder 19, R1 is the inner radius of the container at the stacking shoulder 19, R is the radius of the base 12 at the edge 24 of the base, and (Φ) is the approach angle.


The container also can further be characterized by the dimensions of the base features (FIG. 2 and FIG. 6): r1 is the radius of the base 12 to the outer portion of the annular support structure 20, r2 is the radius of the base 12 to the inner portion of the annular support structure 20, do is the effective distance from the edge 24 of the base to the annular support structure 20, wo is the width of the annular support structure 20, wi is the width of the continuous puncture region 22 of the base 12, and t is the height of the annular support structure 20. Accordingly, in certain embodiments the base 12 is further characterized by the following mathematical relationships:

do=R−r1>0.01
wo=r1−r2>0.01
R>r1>r2
wi=2·r2

In embodiments, r1 and r2, independent from one another, may be from about 0.1 to about 10.0 mm. For example, in embodiments R may be 18.8 mm, r1 may be 9.4 mm, and r2 may be 8.25 mm, such that do is 9.4 mm, wo is and 1.15 mm, wi is 16.5 mm, and t is 0.65 mm. Exemplary ranges of the foregoing variables are summarized in the table below.
















Dimension
Exemplary Ranges




















height of the container
h
20.0 mm-100.0 mm



inner radius of the
R1
11.0 mm-55.0 mm 



container at the stacking



shoulder



radius of the base
R
10.0 mm-50.0 mm 



approach angle
Φ
2 degrees-10 degrees



effective distance from
do
0.5 mm-10.0 mm



edge of base to annular



support structure



outer radius of annular
r1
4.5 mm-49.5 mm



support structure



inner radius of annular
r2
4.0 mm-24.5 mm



support structure



width of annular support
wo
0.5 mm-25.0 mm



structure



height of the annular
t
0.5 mm-5.0 mm 



support structure










In embodiments, a self-supporting filter element (not illustrated) known to those skilled in the art may be disposed in the container and either removably or permanently joined to an interior surface of the container. For example, the filter may be in the shape of an inverted hollow cone having a curved wall tapering evenly from a rim surrounding an opening. The filter element then may be placed in the container so that the apex of the cone is supported on and slightly flattened by the base of the container, thereby enlarging the volume within the cone and providing beneficial support for the filter element.


In embodiments, the container provided herein further comprises a pierceable cover in a hermetically sealed relationship with the lip of the container, closing the opening to form a cartridge. The cover desirably is formed of an impermeable and imperforate material that may be pierced with an instrument, such as a tubular needle, through which hot water is delivered for preparation of the beverage. For example, in embodiments the cover may comprise a polymer film or a foil heat-sealed to the lip of the container.


In embodiments, the containers may be prepared by molding and thermoforming the container from a thermoplastic material. Desirably, the thermoplastic material is substantially impermeable and imperforate. Non-limiting examples of suitable thermoplastic materials include polyolefins such as polypropylene and polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon, and other polymers. In particular embodiments, it is particularly desirable that the thermoplastic material be a bio-based resin, readily recycleable, and/or comprise at least a portion of recycled material. For example, in an embodiment the thermoplastic material may comprise a recycled polypropylene base resin.


In embodiments, the thermoplastic material may be blended with one or more additives to impart the desired mechanical and thermal properties to the container. For example, in embodiments the thermoplastic material may be blended with one or more additives to impart the desired stiffness to the container. In an embodiment, the additive comprises an immiscible polymer that may function as a stress concentrator by hindering the natural ability of the thermoplastic material to deform plastically and promoting controlled crack propagation. Non-limiting examples of immiscible polymers that may be suitable for use with a thermoplastic material comprising polypropylene include acrylics, styrenics, or their blends and copolymers with polyolefins. In an embodiment, the additive comprises a nucleating agent. In an embodiment, a second additive comprises a metallic stearate, non-limiting examples of which include calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, zinc stearate, and combinations thereof. Other non-limiting examples of additives include calcium carbonate, talc, clays, and nano grades of these additives.


In embodiments, the thermoplastic material comprises a blend of a thermoplastic polymer, a nucleating agent, and a second additive selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate, talc, clay, and combinations thereof. For example, the nucleating agent may be present in the thermoplastic material in an amount from about 0.5 to about 5% by weight or about 0.5 to about 2.5% by weight, and the second additive may be present in an amount from about 5 to about 25% by weight, about 5 to about 20% by weight, about 7 to about 18% by weight, about 7 to about 12% by weight, or about 9% by weight. For example, in embodiments the thermoplastic material may comprise a polypropylene, a nucleating agent in an amount from about 0.5 to about 2.5% by weight, and a second additive (e.g., talc) in an amount from about 7 to about 12% by weight.


In embodiments, the thermoplastic material comprises a monolayer or a multilayer material having at least two layers. Such materials are known to those skilled in the art. For example, the thermoplastic material may include a multilayered film having one or more layers formed of a thermoplastic polymer and a barrier layer configured to improve the barrier properties of the material. The multilayered film also may include one or more tie layers disposed between the barrier layer and adjacent thermoplastic polymer layers and, optionally, one or more layers of regrind. Non-limiting examples of barrier layers commonly used in the art include ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) and nylon, with the amount of the additive in the barrier layer being determined at least in part by the particular application for which the container will be used.


For example, in an exemplary embodiment the thermoplastic material is a multilayered film having five (5) layers: thermoplastic polymer/tie layer/barrier layer/tie layer/thermoplastic polymer layer. For example, the thermoplastic polymer may be a polypropylene and the barrier layer may include EVOH. In another exemplary embodiment, the thermoplastic material is a multilayered film having seven (7) layers: thermoplastic polymer/regrind/tie layer/barrier layer/tie layer/regrind/thermoplastic polymer.


Desirably, the containers provided herein have a puncture load of less than about 6 kg. As used herein, the “puncture load” means the force required to puncture the continuous puncture region in the base of the container using a needle. It should be appreciated that the puncture load depends in part on the type of needle used to measure the puncture load of a container. For example, the puncture load measured using a dull needle generally will be greater than the puncture load measured using a sharp needle. For example, in embodiments the containers may have a puncture load measured using a sharp needle of less than about 3 kg, less than about 2.75 kg, or less than about 2.5 kg. In embodiments, the containers may have a puncture load measured using a sharp needle of about 4.2 to about 3 kg, about 2.99 to about 2.75 kg, or about 2.74 to about 2.5 kg. In embodiments, the containers may have a puncture load measured using a dull needle of less than about 5 kg. For example, the containers may have a puncture load measured using a dull needle of about 4.0 to about 5.0 kg.


In embodiments, the container may be configured to receive an insert in which the dry beverage ingredients are disposed. For example, the container may be configured to receive an insert comprising a filter cup in which are disposed the ingredients for preparing a beverage. For example, the container may further comprise a filter cup comprising a brew substance, non-limiting examples of which include coffee grinds, ground tea leaves, chocolate, flavored powders, and the like. The brew substance also may include a combination of dry milk, sugar or sugar substitute, or other flavorings to enhance the quality of the resulting beverage.


The containers embodied herein are particularly suited for use in an automatic machine, such as a coffee brewing machine. Upon placing the container in the machine, a piercing member punctures the cover to introduce pressurized hot water through the hole where it comes into contact with the beverage ingredients disposed in the filter. A second piercing member punctures the base of the container at any position in the continuous puncture region to enable the prepared beverage to flow out of the container and be dispensed into a cup or container for consumption by the consumer.


The containers provided herein also may be configured for use with other types of food products, non-limiting examples of which include dry ingredients for preparing broths, soups, and sauces that may be eaten be themselves or used to prepare a food dish.


The foregoing embodiments can be further understood and illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

Containers (1.9 ounces) were prepared from multi-layer sheets using various combinations of polypropylene compounds, different additives, and barrier materials. Polypropylene base resins included a high stiffness polypropylene and a homopolymer polypropylene and were used either alone or in combination with a stearate masterbatch (Stearate MB) and nucleating agent (NA).


The containers included both an annular support structure and an inner support structure with a continuous puncture region therebetween, the annular support structure being in the form of a ring and the inner support structure being in the form of a circle (i.e., the base of the container had a “donut” shape with a “pineapple” design included on the inside of the container base). The containers were then tested for punctureability with a dull needle (i.e., a needle that has a curved puncturing point rather than a pointed puncture point). When the puncturing point is curved, the load distribution during puncturing changes, resulting in a different behavior of the cups. The results for multilayer containers having seven (7) layers (Polypropylene/Regrind/Tie/Barrier/Tie/Regrind/Polypropylene) are summarized in the following table, which lists the different polypropylene formulations used in the experiments. The barrier layer included 4% EVOH.













PP Compounds
Puncture load, Kg
















High stiffness PP + 4.5% Stearate MB + 1% NA
5.04


High stiffness PP + 4.5% Stearate MB + 2% NA
4.74


Homopolymer PP + 4.5% Stearate MB + 1% NA
4.67


Homopolymer PP + 4.5% Stearate MB + 2% NA
7.67









Example 2

Containers (1.9 ounces) were prepared from monolayer sheets using various combinations of polypropylene compounds and different additives. Polypropylene base resins included a high stiffness polypropylene (PP B) and a homopolymer polypropylene (PP A) and were used alone or in combination with a nucleating agent (NA), calcium carbonate, or talc. It should be noted that both polypropylene resins were nucleated; however, the concentration of nucleating agents present in the base resin are proprietary. Generally, the concentration of nucleating agents in these resins is about 0.1% (about 1000 ppm).


The containers included both an annular support structure and an inner support structure with a continuous puncture region therebetween, the annular support structure being in the form of a ring and the inner support structure being in the form of a circle. The containers were then tested for punctureability with a dull needle (i.e., a needle that has a curved puncturing point rather than a pointed puncture point) to measure the puncture load (kg) and displacement (mm). Additionally, the non-puncture rate was determined from the percentage of containers that did not puncture during testing of ten (10) cups for each type of thermoplastic material formulation.
















Puncture
Displace-
Non-



load*
ment*
puncture


Thermoplastic Material +
(kg)
(mm)
Rate (%)


















85% PP B + 15% Calcium Carbonate
4.76
7.66
50


85% PP A + 15% Calcium Carbonate
4.31
7.06
40


50% PP A + 50% PP B
4.28
6.66
20


96% PP A + 4% PolyOne ®
4.37
6.93
20


98% PP A + 2% NA
4.06
6.65
10


94% PP A + 4% PolyOne ® +
4.69
6.66
10


2% NA


49% PP A + 49% PP B + 2% NA
4.70
7.42
10


85% PP A + 15% Talc
4.69
6.70
0






+ The concentrations are the amount of additional additive added to the base resin and do not include any additives that may be present in the supplier's proprietary blends.



*The puncture load and displacement exclude values from experiments where the container was not punctured.






It should be apparent that the foregoing relates only to certain embodiments of the present application and the resultant patent. Numerous changes and modifications may be made herein by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the general spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims and the equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A thermoplastic container comprising: a substantially circular base;a frustoconically shaped wall extending from an edge of the base and defining a cavity therein; anda stacking shoulder which intersects and extends laterally from the wall;wherein the base comprises an annular support structure surrounding a planar continuous region, the annular support structure being positioned from 0.5 mm to 10 mm from the edge of the base, having a width of from 0.5 mm to 25 mm, and having a height from 0.5 mm to 5 mm, relative to the edge of the base;wherein the thermoplastic container consists of a thermoplastic monolayer material or a thermoplastic multilayer material, the thermoplastic monolayer material or the thermoplastic multilayer material being thermoformed to form the thermoplastic container, wherein the thermoplastic monolayer material consists of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight and one or more additives in an amount from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight,wherein the thermoplastic multilayer material consists of a layer consisting of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight and one or more optional additives in an amount from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight, and one or more layers selected from the group consisting of layers of a thermoplastic polymer blended with or without one or more additives, tie layers, barrier layers, regrind layers, wherein the annular support structure comprises inner and outer sidewalls and a support surface extending between the inner and outer sidewalls, the support surface having the width, and wherein the base comprises an annular wall extending between the outer sidewall of the annular support structure and the edge of the base, the annular wall extending completely along a plane parallel to a plane along which the support surface of the annular support structure completely extends, andwherein the base is punctureable by a single needle and displays a puncture load of less than 3 kg, measured using a sharp needle comprising a pointed puncture point, or of less than 5 kg, measured using a dull needle comprising a curved puncture point.
  • 2. The container of claim 1, further comprising a feature imprinted on an inner surface of the base, wherein the feature functions to increase the punctureability of the base.
  • 3. The container of claim 1, wherein the container is recyclable.
  • 4. A container for forming a beverage comprising the container of claim 1, and further comprising: a filter disposed in the cavity of the container and defining first and second chambers in the cavity;a beverage medium disposed in the cavity and arranged to interact with a liquid introduced into the container to form a beverage; anda lid attached to a rim of the container to contain the beverage medium and filter disposed therein.
  • 5. The container of claim 1, wherein the annular support structure is positioned from 2 mm to 2.5 mm from the edge of the base.
  • 6. The container of claim 1, wherein the continuous region has a width of from 8 mm to 49 mm.
  • 7. The container of claim 1, wherein the continuous region has a width of 16.5 mm.
  • 8. The container of claim 1, wherein the layer consisting of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight further consists of one or more of the optional additives selected from the group consisting of immiscible polymers, metallic stearates, calcium carbonate, talc, clays, and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The container of claim 8, wherein the metallic stearates are selected from the group consisting of calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, zinc stearate, and combinations thereof.
  • 10. The container of claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic monolayer material or the layer consisting of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight and one or more optional additives in an amount from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight, consists of the polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight, a nucleating agent in an amount from 0.5 to 5 percent by weight of the thermoplastic material, and talc in an amount from 7 to 18 percent by weight.
  • 11. The container of claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic monolayer material or the layer consisting of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight and one or more optional additives in an amount from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight consists of the polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight, a nucleating agent in an amount from 0.5 to 2.5 percent by weight, and talc in an amount from 7 to 12 percent by weight.
  • 12. The container of claim 1, wherein the container consists of the thermoplastic multilayer material and the layer consisting of polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight and one or more optional additives in an amount from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight forms an outermost layer of the container opposite the cavity.
  • 13. The container of claim 1, wherein the container consists of the thermoplastic multilayer material, and the thermoplastic multilayer material further consists of the at least one barrier layer, which is selected from the group consisting of ethylene vinyl alcohol and nylon.
  • 14. The container of claim 1, wherein the annular support structure defines a puncture region of the base.
  • 15. The container of claim 1, wherein the annular support structure comprises a support surface having the width, the support surface of the annular support structure extending completely along a plane parallel to a plane along which the continuous region of the base completely extends.
  • 16. The container of claim 15, wherein the inner sidewall extends between the continuous region of the base and the support surface.
  • 17. The container of claim 1, wherein: the container has a height measured from the stacking shoulder to the edge of the base, anda ratio of the height of the annular support structure to the height of the container is from 0.5:100 to 5:100.
  • 18. The container of claim 1, wherein the frustoconically shaped wall is free of radial protrusions or shoulders other than the stacking shoulder.
  • 19. A thermoplastic container comprising: a substantially circular base;a frustoconically shaped wall extending from an edge of the base and defining a cavity therein; anda stacking shoulder which intersects and extends laterally from the wall;wherein the base comprises an annular support structure surrounding a continuous region, the annular support structure being positioned from 0.5 mm to 10 mm from the edge of the base, having a width of from 0.5 mm to 25 mm, and having a height from 0.5 mm to 5 mm, relative to the edge of the base,wherein the annular support structure comprises inner and outer sidewalls and a support surface extending between the inner and outer sidewalls, the support surface having the width,wherein the base comprises an annular wall extending between the outer sidewall of the annular support structure and the edge of the base, the annular wall extending completely along a plane parallel to a plane along which the support surface of the annular support structure completely extends,wherein the thermoplastic container is thermoformed and comprises a thermoplastic monolayer material comprising polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight or a thermoplastic multilayer material comprising one or more layers that comprise polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight, wherein the base is punctureable by a single needle and displays a puncture load of less than 3 kg, measured using a sharp needle comprising a pointed puncture point, or of less than 5 kg, measured using a dull needle comprising a curved puncture point.
  • 20. The thermoplastic container of claim 19, wherein the support surface of the annular support structure extends completely along a plane parallel to a plane along which the continuous region of the base completely extends.
  • 21. The thermoplastic container of claim 19, wherein the inner sidewall of the annular support structure extends between the continuous region of the base and the support surface of the annular support structure.
  • 22. The container of claim 19, wherein the frustoconically shaped wall is free of radial protrusions or shoulders other than the stacking shoulder.
  • 23. A thermoplastic container comprising: a substantially circular base;a frustoconically shaped wall extending from an edge of the base and defining a cavity therein; anda stacking shoulder which intersects and extends laterally from the wall, the container having a height measured from the stacking shoulder to the edge of the base;wherein the base comprises an annular support structure surrounding a continuous region, the annular support structure being positioned from 0.5 mm to 10 mm from the edge of the base, having a width of from 0.5 mm to 25 mm, and having a height from 0.5 mm to 5 mm, relative to the edge of the base;wherein a ratio of the height of the annular support structure to the height of the container is from 0.5:100 to 5:100,wherein the thermoplastic container is thermoformed and comprises a thermoplastic monolayer material comprising polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight or a thermoplastic multilayer material comprising one or more layers that comprise polypropylene in an amount of at least 70 percent by weight,wherein the base is punctureable by a single needle and displays a puncture load of less than 3 kg, measured using a sharp needle comprising a pointed puncture point, or of less than 5 kg, measured using a dull needle comprising a curved puncture point, and wherein the annular support structure comprises inner and outer sidewalls and a support surface extending between the inner and outer sidewalls, the support surface having the width, and wherein the base comprises an annular wall extending between the outer sidewall of the annular support structure and the edge of the base, the annular wall extending completely along a plane parallel to a plan along which the support surface of the annular support structure completely extends.
  • 24. The container of claim 23, wherein the frustoconically shaped wall is free of radial protrusions or shoulders other than the stacking shoulder.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/811,397 filed on Apr. 12, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
2614727 Robinson Oct 1952 A
3357590 Safford Dec 1967 A
3935955 Das Feb 1976 A
D240019 Taylor May 1976 S
D241228 Boduch Aug 1976 S
D260967 Taylor Sep 1981 S
D270332 Gaunt Aug 1983 S
D272418 Gruodis et al. Jan 1984 S
4859337 Woltermann Aug 1989 A
4925048 Noack May 1990 A
D327845 Behm et al. Jul 1992 S
D330330 Behm et al. Oct 1992 S
D330514 Edwards Oct 1992 S
5232120 Dunken et al. Aug 1993 A
5325765 Sylvan et al. Jul 1994 A
D351790 Haindl Oct 1994 S
5375719 Mittmann et al. Dec 1994 A
5419436 Powell May 1995 A
D364564 Moore Nov 1995 S
D380383 Wiemann et al. Jul 1997 S
D390460 Schmidt Feb 1998 S
D398528 Wiemann et al. Sep 1998 S
5840189 Sylvan et al. Nov 1998 A
5992632 Karren Nov 1999 A
6024244 Hicks Feb 2000 A
6086931 Whiteford Jul 2000 A
6134832 Bokmiller et al. Oct 2000 A
6138862 Tai Oct 2000 A
D435216 Paoloski Dec 2000 S
D438794 Miles et al. Mar 2001 S
D452434 Sweeney Dec 2001 S
6440256 Gordon et al. Aug 2002 B1
D474110 Sweeney May 2003 S
D474111 Lazaris May 2003 S
6589577 Lazaris Jul 2003 B2
6607762 Lazaris et al. Aug 2003 B2
6645537 Sweeney et al. Nov 2003 B2
6683125 Augestad et al. Jan 2004 B1
6810788 Hale Nov 2004 B2
6837377 Shuert Jan 2005 B2
D502362 Lazaris et al. Mar 2005 S
D502870 Bennett et al. Mar 2005 S
D504814 Bretz et al. May 2005 S
D519831 De Cleir et al. May 2006 S
D522368 Darr et al. Jun 2006 S
D528422 Darr et al. Sep 2006 S
D530615 Darr et al. Oct 2006 S
D532293 Martin Nov 2006 S
D532307 Durand Nov 2006 S
D541147 LaMasney Apr 2007 S
7204056 Sieverding Apr 2007 B2
D554507 Laupie Nov 2007 S
D554508 YunFu Nov 2007 S
D574242 Lin Aug 2008 S
D577288 Wilson et al. Sep 2008 S
D595581 Brunson Jul 2009 S
D603221 Liu et al. Nov 2009 S
D605502 Honda et al. Dec 2009 S
D606363 Aardenburg Dec 2009 S
7624535 Schmidt Dec 2009 B2
7624673 Zanetti Dec 2009 B2
D607329 Diss Jan 2010 S
7677435 Stahlecker Mar 2010 B2
D616704 Hou Jun 2010 S
D620310 Lundberg Jul 2010 S
D622147 Pedmo Aug 2010 S
D623063 Pedmo Sep 2010 S
7789255 Zoppas Sep 2010 B2
D628476 Vang Dec 2010 S
D628883 Stephens Dec 2010 S
D630947 Mashouf Jan 2011 S
7891513 Mody et al. Feb 2011 B2
D637484 Winkler May 2011 S
7981451 Ozanne Jul 2011 B2
D643734 Perez Aug 2011 S
D645340 Menard et al. Sep 2011 S
D647398 Winkler Oct 2011 S
D647399 Winkler Oct 2011 S
D648212 Golota et al. Nov 2011 S
D651096 Nakagiri Dec 2011 S
D651901 Miller et al. Jan 2012 S
8127663 Nottingham et al. Mar 2012 B2
D686916 O'Brien Jul 2013 S
D687297 O'Brien et al. Aug 2013 S
D700839 O'Brien et al. Mar 2014 S
20020112983 Padovani Aug 2002 A1
20020134701 Olsthoorn et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030222089 Hale Dec 2003 A1
20040173565 Semersky et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050017013 Peisach et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050051478 Karanikos Mar 2005 A1
20050173287 Smith et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050255678 Kato Nov 2005 A1
20070161739 Helland et al. Jul 2007 A1
20090162683 Douard Jun 2009 A1
20090175986 Doglioni Majer Jul 2009 A1
20090194546 Lane Aug 2009 A1
20090200301 Beekman et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100018889 Korpanty et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100064899 Aardenburg Mar 2010 A1
20100072165 Schau Mar 2010 A1
20100239717 Yoakim Sep 2010 A1
20100288131 Kilber et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100288133 Litzka et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303964 Beaulieu Dec 2010 A1
20100303965 Mariller Dec 2010 A1
20100317779 Pham et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110005399 Epars Jan 2011 A1
20110041702 Yoakim Feb 2011 A1
20110076361 Peterson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110142996 Krüger Jun 2011 A1
20110147392 Trude et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110151075 Peterson Jun 2011 A1
20110240506 D'Amato Oct 2011 A1
20110259205 Delorme Oct 2011 A1
20110283890 Scrivani Nov 2011 A1
20110305801 Beer Dec 2011 A1
20120006205 Vanni Jan 2012 A1
20120055832 Riethmueller Mar 2012 A1
20120058226 Winkler Mar 2012 A1
20120097602 Tedford Apr 2012 A1
20120121764 Lai et al. May 2012 A1
20120121768 Lai et al. May 2012 A1
20120171332 Lai et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120201933 Dran et al. Aug 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0265075 Apr 1988 EP
0278470 Sep 1988 EP
0615921 Nov 1994 EP
0953602 Mar 1999 EP
2444339 Apr 2012 EP
2572609 Mar 2013 EP
09176328 Jul 1997 JP
10273569 Oct 1998 JP
2008136026 Nov 2008 WO
2012011053 Jan 2012 WO
2012055751 May 2012 WO
2012122329 Sep 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Mubarak et al., Effect of nucleating agents and pigments on crystallisation, morphology, and mechanical properties of polypropylene, Jul. 2000, Maney Online, vol. 29 Issue 7. http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/146580100101541111.
A photo of a Swiss Miss cup shaped container, undated, admitted prior art.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/033315, mailed Aug. 31, 2015 (14 pages).
Second Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/033315, mailed Mar. 12, 2015 (5 pages).
Third Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/033315, mailed Jun. 18, 2015 (4 pages).
International Search Report and First Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/033315, mailed Oct. 15, 2014 (18 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140308406 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61811397 Apr 2013 US