The present invention is directed to reactive gabion/geocomposite articles for controlling or preventing the further spread of contaminants in soil, sediment or water. More particularly, the reactive gabion/geocomposite articles described herein include a reactive core geocomposite mat in contact with a gabion cage or grid, wherein the geocomposite mat contains a powdered or granular reactive material, such as activated carbon, coke breeze, peat moss, polymeric ion exchange resins, polymeric adsorbing resins; zero-valent iron, magnetite, apatite, organophilic clay, zeolite, diatomaceous earth; contaminant-degrading microbes; or mixtures thereof. The geocomposite mat is liquid-permeable and is in contact with an upper gabion cage or grid that is weighted, e.g., with rock or the like, before, after or during positioning. In another embodiment, a flexible gabion cage or grid is wrapped around the reactive geocomposite, to sandwich the reactive geocomposite within a folded gabion cage or grid, thereby covering the upper and lower major surfaces of the reactive geocomposite with the gabion cage or grid. In all embodiments that incorporate a reactive geocomposite mat, the mat may be secured to the weighted gabion cage or grid mechanically, by heat bonding, or adhesively, or simply held under the weighted gabion cage or grid without mechanical fastening, heat bonding, or adhesive fastening.
In-situ capping of underwater contaminants involves the placing of a subaqueous cover over contaminated sediments to stabilize sediments, minimize their re-suspension and transport, and reduce dissolved contaminant transport into surface waters.
In past applications, in-situ capping has typically been constructed with either, a) loosely placed clean sediment, silt and sand; b) bulk reactive material such as organoclay, or c) a low permeability liner such as geomembrane or geosynthetic clay liner; or d) reactive geocomposite mat.
Disadvantages of loosely placed clean sediment, silt or sand are: low carbon content requires relatively thick cap; the material may segregate upon settling resulting in stratified layers; benthic organisms may burrow into the material.
Disadvantages of bulk reactive material are: the angle of repose requires material on the sides beyond the area of concern, and difficulty in placing the material through water.
A disadvantage of low permeability liners is that they may be subject to uplift from gases generated by the sediment below the liner.
The prior art is replete with methods and articles used to confine or store a wide variety of environmental contaminants ranging from completely capping, in-situ, contaminated sediments that are left in-place in underwater environments; terrestrial landfills wherein dredged or otherwise collected contaminated sediments are placed within an engineered disposal site surrounded with an impervious liner system and capped with an impervious material; and the use of a reactive mat and/or reactive backfill that surrounds the contaminated material. Examples of reactive geocomposites and mats are found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,284,681 B1 ('681) and published application US 2002/0151241 A1 ('241). The reactive geocomposites described in these two publications include one or more layers of reactive material each surrounded by outer geotextiles that allow contaminated liquid to pass through the reactive layer for sorption or reaction of the contaminants with a reactive material contained between the outer geotextile layers, and in the case of the '241 published application, the geocomposite may be deployed vertically.
One of the major problems encountered with the use of reactive mats for controlling or confining contaminated materials, or in controlling or preventing leaching of contaminants from sediments and preventing the contaminants from entering ground water supplies, and particularly from ground water traversing upwardly through a lake or ocean soil interface into the lake or ocean, is in the ability to provide a transportable, integral mat having a sufficient volume or thickness of reactive material so that the mat provides very long term protection without the necessity of periodic replacement. The reactive mats described in the '681 patent and in the '241 publication provide alternating layers of geotextile/reactive material/geotextile/reactive material since a sufficient thickness of reactive material cannot be provided in a single reactive material core layer without that reactive material being lost during transportation or installation. The mat disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,498 does not have adjacent layers interconnected but relies upon a rock covering layer to maintain the mat in position. The mat disclosed in the '498 patent has separate layers that are not structurally interconnected and may easily separate due to the powerful hydraulic force experienced with lake and river ground water supplies. Also, deployment of separate geotextiles and reactive materials through a water column is difficult.
This assignee's U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,237,945 ('945) and 5,389,166 ('166) describe the manufacture of a water barrier formed from a clay-fiber mat that may include a powdered or granular bentonite clay, a powdered or granular liquid-interacting material, e.g., a contaminant-reactant, or providing the contaminant-reactant as a separate layer in the water barrier product. The water barrier mat formed in accordance with the '945 and '166 patents is manufactured by laying down geosynthetic fibers and the water swellable clay, with or without the contaminant-reactant material, simultaneously. In this manner, a geosynthetic composite material can be manufactured wherein the geosynthetic fibers are surrounded by the water-swellable clay, with or without the contaminant-reactant material, in initially forming a relatively thick geotextile that essentially prevents water flow-through (maximum water-permeability of 1×10−7 cm/sec.). Such a mat must be subsequently consolidated and the fibers must be substantially densified after the initial formation of the mixture of powdered or granular material and fibers in an attempt to secure the fibers in position surrounding the powdered or granular material.
In brief described herein are reactive gabion/geocomposite articles, and their methods of manufacture, for controlling contaminants in soil or water that allow the passage of essentially non-contaminated water therethrough. The articles and methods described herein utilize gabions, which are box shaped cages or grids (see
Advantages of Reactive Gabion/Geocomposite Articles
A second embodiment is a two-step system with a reactive geosynthetic mat or geosynthetic clay liner mat containing reactive material overlain by a rock-filled gabion.
Advantages of Reactive Gabion/Geocomposite Mat System:
1. Mat provides complete coverage;
2. gabion allows consolidation; and
3. gabion/mat will not be displaced by gas uplift or scour.
In one embodiment, a liquid-permeable reactive geocomposite mat, or reactive material-containing geocomposite mat, such as disclosed in this assignee's U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/599,080, filed Nov. 14, 2006, hereby incorporated by reference, containing one or more reactive materials, is disposed under a lower major surface of a rock filled or partially filled gabion. The weighted gabion cage or grid prevents the reactive geosynthetic mat from movement from its position during use, transportation, installation, and deployment.
Suitable powdered or granular contaminant-reactive materials include organophilic clay, activated carbon, coke breeze, zero-valent iron, magnetite, apatite, zeolite, peat moss, polymeric ion exchange resins, polymeric adsorbents, contaminant-degrading microbes and mixtures thereof. The geocomposite mat can be inoculated with microbes or microorganisms and optionally, a food supply for the microorganisms, as disclosed in application Ser. No. 11/221,019, filed Sep. 7, 2005, hereby incorporated by reference. Any water-permeable geosynthetic sheets or fabrics may be used to form the reactive geocomposite articles, such as polyolefins, e.g., polypropylene, polyethylene and copolymers thereof, rayon; polyesters; nylon; acrylic polymers and copolymers; polyamides; polyamide copolymers; polyurethanes, and the like.
The method of manufacture permits the manufacture of a reactive gabion/geocomposite article that includes a contaminant-reactant material that is structurally secure, without lateral movement, and contains contaminant-reactant material that maintains its uniform disposition throughout the reactive geocomposite mat.
A powdered or granular water-swellable clay material can be applied in a relatively high concentration at or near the edges of the reactive geocomposite mats, adjacent to one or both major surfaces to permit the water-swellable clay to extrude through the edges of the gabions, thereby creating a sealing layer for sealing seams between adjacent reactive gabion/geocomposite articles.
Accordingly, one aspect of the contaminant-reactive gabion/geocomposite articles described herein is to provide a new and improved water-permeable article of manufacture and method of making the article by incorporating a powdered or granular contaminant-reactant material into a gabion cage containment structure, e.g., a reactive geocomposite mat, wherein the reactive material is encased within or between one or more water-permeable geotextile sheets or fabrics, and the composite is held in position within or below a weighted gabion grid or cage.
A further aspect of the gabion/geocomposite articles described herein is to provide a new and improved article of manufacture including a powdered or granular contaminant-reactant or contaminant-interacting material contained in a reactive geocomposite article that is contained within or below a weighted gabion grid or cage structure, wherein the contaminant-reactive material is selected from the group consisting of an organophilic clay, a zeolite, a contaminant-absorbent, a contaminant-adsorbent, an ion-exchange material, a contaminant-reactant, a contaminant-neutralizing material, and mixtures thereof as separately applied or intermixed material, with or without contaminant-feeding microorganisms. The powdered or granular materials including filler materials, such as sand, rock and/or rip-rap may be applied as an admixture, or applied sequentially within the reactive geocomposite mat, and/or gabion cage contaminant structure. Preferably, the reactive geocomposite is filled with contaminant-reactive powdered or granular material in an amount of at least about 10 lb/ft3 up to about 150 lb/ft3, preferably about 30 lb/ft3 to about 100 lb/ft3, throughout the thickness, or throughout any upper central or lower portion of the thickness resulting in an article that has a water permeability of at least 1×10−6 cm/sec, preferably in the range of 10−4 to 102 cm/sec.
In terms of ft2 of powdered or granular reactive material contained within the reactive geocomposite mat 11, based on surface area, some target loadings for various reactive materials (which can vary about 50% up or down) are as follows:
The above and other aspects and advantages of the contaminant-reactive gabion/geocomposite articles and their methods of manufacture will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
Turning now to
As shown in
As shown in
In accordance with the embodiment shown in
Generally, in all embodiments described herein, multiple gabion cages 13 are connected together, (called a gang of cages) as shown in
In accordance with additional important embodiments of the gabion/geocomposite articles and deployment methods described herein, as shown in
In accordance with a preferred method of maintaining the reactive material 17A within the geotextile sack, as shown in
In accordance with another important embodiment of the gabion/geocomposite articles and deployment methods described herein, as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4250172 | Mutzenberg et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4622260 | Tesch | Nov 1986 | A |
5043076 | Alexander | Aug 1991 | A |
5237945 | White | Aug 1993 | A |
5346565 | White | Sep 1994 | A |
5368410 | Ferraiolo | Nov 1994 | A |
5900085 | Clarey et al. | May 1999 | A |
6368017 | Black | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379543 | Bowman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6610781 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7128498 | Sheahan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20050103707 | Olsta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2337723 | Dec 1999 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080264546 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |