The present invention is directed toward improving the resistance of hearing device sound ports to contamination. More specifically, the invention is directed toward improving the resistance of “completely in the canal” (CIC) hearing devices to ear wax (i.e. cerumen, which is produced in the ear) and water which can impinge on the sound ports from a shower, a pool, or perspiration from outside or within the ear.
The vast majority of hearing assistance devices are air conduction hearing aids, meaning that sound enters the device via the air and is transmitted from the device to the tympanic membrane of the patient via air. Sound waves traveling in the air impinge on a microphone which generates an electrical signal that is processed, amplified, and drives a speaker (called the “receiver” in the hearing aid art) which sends amplified and processed sound waves in air toward the tympanic membrane of the patient. Thus, most hearing aids have a sound port for the microphone and a sound port for the receiver. If these sound ports get plugged or otherwise compromised by contaminants, the hearing aid's performance degrades.
The nature of contaminants that can affect sound ports depend on the location of the sound ports, which in turn depends on the type of hearing aid. For example, the microphone port in a conventional BTE (Behind The Ear) device is located on the module suspended on the pinna, and is susceptible to water and debris from the environment and hair, but is not susceptible to wax. In contrast, the receiver port of a conventional CIC (completely in the canal) hearing aid is susceptible to cerumen and moisture produced in the cartilaginous portion of the ear canal where the receiver port is typically located. It is desirable to have sound ports that are resistant to contamination and do not distort the acoustic signals as the sound waves pass through the ports. Hearing aid designers and manufacturers have attempted many approaches, but none of the approaches attempted to date meets the requirements of extended wear CIC hearing aids which are worn deep in the canal for extended periods of weeks or months.
Extended wear hearing devices, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,215,789 to Shennib et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,940,988 to Shennib et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,473,513 to Shennib et al., are worn continuously for periods from several weeks to several months inside the ear canal. These devices as taught by Shennib et al. are miniature in size in order to fit entirely within the ear canal and are adapted for the receiver to fit deeply in the ear canal in proximity to the tympanic membrane (TM). However, the devices' microphone port, as taught, is exposed to the cartilaginous portion of the canal, and consequently the cerumen, moisture, and debris that could be present.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,738,488, Baker teaches a hearing aid with features to protect the receiver sound port. Features include a tortuous path that allows sound to reach the eardrum, but impede the flow of cerumen to the receiver. Additional features include a shield, and a mesh, also to stop cerumen Inherent in the design is the need to remove the device and clean the mesh and shield in the event it gets clogged by cerumen, which Baker acknowledges is likely. With regard to protection from water, the teaching is less convincing because it requires a particular orientation of the hearing device with respect to gravity, and during an average wearer's day, the head can be in may orientations with respect to gravity. Furthermore, the local forces of capillary action, fluid adhesion, and fluid cohesion are not discussed, and in fact dominate the effect of gravity. The designs of the Baker's patent would not pass a high fidelity signal into a microphone, nor would they protect a device that remains in the ear for extended periods from wax and water.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,277, Bisgaard et al teach a protection element for an all-in-the-ear hearing aid. The protection element is properly designed acoustically, but contains a wax filter which is replaced. Replacement of the filter requires the removal of the device from the ear and special tooling. The approach of Bisgaard and similar filter methods are therefore not appropriate for a device that is intended to remain in the ear for extended periods without cleaning the device.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,972,488, Weiss and Stanton teach protection schemes based on tortuous paths similar to those of Baker. The teachings acknowledge that such tortuous paths will have an impact on the acoustic transfer function. Most significantly, in the Weiss patent as well as the Bisgaard and Baker patents, emphasis is placed only on wax protection. Water and moisture are not considered, and in fact water would flood and wick into the protection schemes without additional precautions due to capillary action in the tortuous paths.
In order to design sound ports resistant to the relatively hostile environment of the ear canal, all of water, soapy water, perspiration, cerumen and debris need to be considered.
The present invention, illustrated with preferred embodiments directed toward a deep in the ear canal device, provides for high fidelity contamination resistant sound ports. The deep in the canal, extended wear devices, such as those described in the Shennib patents referenced above, place the receiver so deep in the canal that it is insulated from most potential contaminants in the cartilaginous region by the retaining seals, and it is the microphone (input) sound port that requires protection. The device may also have an air cathode battery requiring oxygen, which should also pass unimpeded across the input sound port. While such sound/air ports will typically benefit the most from the improvements of the present invention, they can also be used with the receiver output and any other ports that may be found in the device housing. They may also be used with batteries and other power sources that do not require air or oxygen.
While primarily intended for extended wear CIC devices, as disclosed in the preferred embodiments, the present invention could also be used to protect the sound ports of monitor microphones, receiver in the canal devices, and other air conduction hearing aid and device configurations. Furthermore, the invention could be used to protect an air access port in a housing for zinc air batteries of the type typically used with hearing aids.
It is the objective of this invention to provide sound and other ports for hearing devices that are resistant to contamination.
Another objective of this invention is to provide a miniature port enabling both unimpaired sound transmission into a microphone of a miniature hearing device and access to oxygen for an air cathode battery, while at the same time blocking the ingress of liquids and solids, especially cerumen, water, sweat, and soapy water.
Another objective is to provide a miniature sound port whose surrounding material is engineered to wick deposits away from the port and prevent build-up that could eventually clog the port.
Another objective is to provide an extended wear hearing assist device which is not susceptible to deterioration from wax, water, and sweat for a period of at least two months.
Another objective is to provide an extended wear canal device which is entirely within the bony portion, but whose sound port could on occasion be exposed to contaminants secreted in the cartilaginous portion of the canal.
Another objective is to provide an extended wear canal device whose sound and air entry point is in the cartilaginous portion.
The above objectives are achieved at least in part by designs of the present invention as described below. By placing two hydrophobic surfaces opposite each other, a capillary barrier is created, i.e., a structure which provides a mechanism which is the opposite of capillary action. That is, each surface will have a water droplet contact angle greater than 90 degrees (a formal definition of hydrophobicity). When these surfaces are placed close together, typically separated by a distance in the range from 0.001 inch to 0.1 inch, water entering into the space between the surfaces will be inhibited. Similarly, oleophobic surfaces with a lipid droplet contact angle greater than 90 degrees and a spacing in the range from 0.001 inch to 0.1 inch will not allow liquid phase lipid substances such as cerumen to enter. Solid phase cerumen, typically in the form of chunks or particles, may be blocked by other barriers as described in more detail below.
Surfaces that are both oleophobic and hydrophobic can be created by modifying the surface wettability and/or geometry of the opposing surfaces. Coatings which are hydrophobic (water droplet contact angle greater than 90 degrees) and somewhat oleophobic (lipid or oil droplet contact angle greater than 60 degrees but less than 90 degrees), can be used for simpler resistant ports without the need of surface geometry modifications. The term “oleophobic” as used herein to describe surfaces and coatings will include both surfaces and coatings which are fully oleophobic (lipid droplet contact angle greater than or equal to 90 degrees) and surfaces and coatings which are partially oleophobic (lipid droplet contact angle greater than 60 degrees but less than 90 degrees).
The present invention provides optimized geometric arrangements, dimensions and/or coatings of the opposed surfaces to create openings that pass sound waves with minimum attenuation and air/oxygen in sufficient quantity to permit functioning of metal air batteries while blocking liquids, including mixtures of water, cerumen, soap, salt and other contaminants that are often found in the ear canal. Furthermore, in the event that contaminant deposits start to collect around the sound port and potentially block it, the present invention can provide “wettability gradients” that can wick or draw contaminants away from areas which can block the port or otherwise interfere with operation of the hearing device to regions where the contaminants will not be problematic.
In addition to creating surface-modified channels and ports for creating contaminant barriers while allowing the passage of air and sound waves, the present invention provides for additional barriers which prevent larger pieces of cerumen and other contaminants from blocking or clogging the passages. In particular, surrounding walls, typically in the form of open-ended tubular coverings, may be placed so that they surround the hydrophobic/oleophobic barriers that prevent liquid contaminants from entering the in-canal hearing device. These surrounding wall structures are typically compliant or elastic, usually being formed from elastomers, so that they are more comfortable in the ear canal and are able to bend and reconfigure so that the open ends remain clear and free from cerumen and other large pieces of debris. The surrounding wall structures further prevent hair found in the cartilaginous portion of the ear canal from entering the sound port passages.
While the hearing devices of the present invention will benefit from both the hydrophobic/oleophobic liquid and vapor barrier and the surrounding wall cerumen barrier even if used individually, used together they provide a very high degree of protection against blocking and clogging of the open passages and channels of such devices.
Embodiments of the invention provide housings for hearing device components, where the housings have an interior and an exterior, with a sound/air port (which will typically include an opening or aperture through the housing) that defines an air exchange path which provides sound and air communication between the interior and exterior of the housing. In particular, the present invention comprises structures, coatings, and/or other surface modifications which create resistance to contamination of the sound/air port which can occur when the housing is worn in the ear canal, often for extended time periods of days, weeks, or months. More particularly, the present invention provides an extended wear “completely in the canal” (CIC) hearing aid having a microphone assembly and/or a metal air battery in the interior of the housing that open to the ear canal through the sound/air port which is resistant to fouling by contaminants typically present in the ear canal, such as water, liquid and solid cerumen, and other ear canal debris, allowing the device to be worn for extended periods of time without removal for cleaning, battery replacement or other maintenance.
Referring now to
Receiver assembly 32 is configured to supply acoustical signals received from the microphone assembly 42 to the tympanic membrane 18 of the wearer of the device. The microphone assembly 42 includes a microphone 40 and microphone sound ports 44 through which sound waves enter the microphone and air reaches the battery assembly 52 (which will usually include an air-metal battery which requires a supply of air to produce current). The microphone 40 is configured to receive incoming acoustic signals. One or both of the receiver assembly or microphone assembly can include sealing retainers 33 and 43. Battery assembly 52 and speaker assembly 32 can be coupled by a coupling 36.
Battery assembly 52 includes a battery (not shown) configured to provide power to hearing device 38 for an extended periods of operation and is thus desirably a high capacity battery. In many embodiments the battery is a metal air battery which has an electrochemistry that utilizes oxygen to generate electricity. Accordingly, in such embodiments, air can enter through the sound ports 44 and/or the battery assembly 52 can include a battery vent though which air including oxygen can enter the battery. Example metal air batteries include, but are not limited to, aluminum, calcium, iron, lithium, magnesium-air based battery. In a preferred embodiment, the battery is a zinc-air battery known in the art. In alternative embodiments, the battery can employ a variety of electrochemistry known in the art including, but not limited to, lithium, lithium polymer, lithium ion, nickel cadmium, nickel metal hydride, or lead acid or combinations thereof.
In many embodiments, the microphone assembly 42 and battery assembly 52 are positioned in the ear canal such that surrounding air volume 60 is fluidically coupled to the battery and microphone via sound port 44 and battery vent (if present). This allows sound waves to reach the sound port and oxygen to reach the battery vent.
Referring now to
The cap 90 can have a variety of shapes including, but not limited to, cylindrical, semi-spherical and thimble shaped. In a preferred embodiment, the cap 90 is substantially cylindrically shaped and includes a side wall portion and an interior or cavity portion, microphone assembly 42 and battery assembly 52 may be positioned within the interior or cavity portion. In many embodiments, the cap includes one or more perforations 91 which can be configured to serves as channels for ventilation for moisture reduction, oxygen supply to the battery, and acoustical conduction as is discussed herein. Perforations 91 can be positioned in various locations throughout the cap but are preferentially positioned in patterns on the top and sides of the cap. All or portions of cap 90, including the walls of the perforations, can include a protective coating which can be configured to be hydrophobic, oleophobic, and cerumenophobic to prevent or minimize water, oils and cerumen from entering the cavity.
In many embodiments, the cap interior has a sufficient volume and shape to serve as a receptacle for various components of hearing aid 38 including, but not limited to, microphone assembly 42 and associated integrated circuit assemblies, battery assembly 52, receiver assembly 32 and electrical harnesses or connections for one or more hearing aid components. After the component or components are placed within the cap interior, a setting or encapsulation material can be added. In a preferred embodiment, the cap is configured to serve as a receptacle to the microphone assembly when the microphone is oriented in a medial direction of the ear canal. In such embodiments, the cap is also configured to provide sufficient acoustical transmittance to the microphone assembly such that the hearing aid provides adequate function to the user (e.g., amplification, frequency response, etc).
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In all of the above embodiments, the housings will define passages for permitting the entry of air and sound waves through the aperture of the hearing device enclosure. The surfaces will be modified to be partially or fully hydrophobic and partially or fully oleophobic. Such surface modification may result from coating the surfaces with materials which are at least partially hydrophobic and at least partially oleophobic. Alternatively or additionally, the surfaces may be modified to have surface features which physically impact the collection and wetting of water and cerumen to inhibit passage of these materials over the surfaces or between opposed surfaces.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
An alternate embodiment 330 of the sound port having an orthogonally oriented and inwardly flaring open air sound channel 332 coupled with a protective flexible tube 334 is illustrated in
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 61/218,591 filed on Jun. 19, 2009, and is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 11/874,011, filed on Oct. 12, 2007, now U.S. Patent No. 8,036,407, which was a continuation of U.S. Application No. 11/053,656, filed Feb. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,298,857, which claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/542,776, filed on Feb. 5, 2004, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. The application is related to but does not claim the benefit of the following: U.S. Pat. No. 6,473,513 issued Oct. 29, 2002; U.S. Pat. No. 6,940,988, issued Sep. 6, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 7,379,555, issued May 27, 2008; U.S. Pat. No. 7,388,961, issued Jun. 17, 2008; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,551,747, issued on Jun. 23, 2009, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3061689 | McCarrell et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
RE26258 | Martin | Aug 1967 | E |
3414685 | Geib et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3527901 | Geib | Sep 1970 | A |
3594514 | Wingrove | Jul 1971 | A |
3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3783201 | Weiss et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3865998 | Weiss et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3870832 | Fredrickson | Mar 1975 | A |
3882285 | Nunley et al. | May 1975 | A |
4442917 | Johnson | Apr 1984 | A |
4539440 | Sciarra | Sep 1985 | A |
4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4607720 | Hardt | Aug 1986 | A |
4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
4639556 | Hartl et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4680799 | Henneberger | Jul 1987 | A |
4756312 | Epley | Jul 1988 | A |
4776322 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4817607 | Tatge | Apr 1989 | A |
4817609 | Perkins et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830139 | Cirillo | May 1989 | A |
4840178 | Heide et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880076 | Ahlberg et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4937876 | Biermans | Jun 1990 | A |
4957478 | Maniglia | Sep 1990 | A |
4972488 | Weiss et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984277 | Bisgaard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5002151 | Oliveira et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
5015225 | Hough et al. | May 1991 | A |
5163957 | Sade et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5220612 | Tibbetts et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220918 | Heide et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5259032 | Perkins et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282858 | Bisch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5338287 | Miller et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5390254 | Adelman | Feb 1995 | A |
5401920 | Oliveira | Mar 1995 | A |
5425104 | Shennib | Jun 1995 | A |
5430801 | Hill | Jul 1995 | A |
5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
5531787 | Lesinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659621 | Newton | Aug 1997 | A |
5682020 | Oliveira | Oct 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5742692 | Garcia | Apr 1998 | A |
5825896 | Leedom | Oct 1998 | A |
5833626 | Leysieffer | Nov 1998 | A |
5949895 | Ball et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982908 | Bauman | Nov 1999 | A |
6058198 | Aceti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6208741 | Shennib et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212283 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6408081 | Boesen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449373 | Baker | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6595796 | Koegel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620110 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643378 | Schumaier | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648813 | Zilberman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658126 | Stern | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6738488 | Baker | May 2004 | B1 |
6932187 | Banter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7215789 | Shennib et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7283640 | Karamuk | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298857 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7329933 | Zhe et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7379555 | Gable et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388961 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7466836 | Tilson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7551747 | Huynh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558394 | Tilson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20050249370 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259840 | Gable et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286731 | Shennib et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036470 | Oaks | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050914 | Urso | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070003084 | Huynh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080031482 | Shennib et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090092270 | Ho et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090238389 | Tilson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100086159 | Gabathuler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100322452 | Ladabaum et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0052964 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 5,730,699, 03/1993, Adams et al. (withdrawn). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/039375, mailed Aug. 17, 2010, 7 pages total. |
Ballachanda, The Human Ear Canal, Singular Publishing, 1950, pp. 195. |
Chasin, CIC Handbook, Singular Publishing Group, Inc. (1997), pp. 5, 9-14, 17-18, 27-28, 44, 56-58, and 65-66. |
Oliveira, et al, “The Wax Problem: Two New Approaches,” The Hearing Journal, 1993; 46(8: 41-46, 48. |
Plawsky et al., “Review of the effects of surface topography, surface chemistry and fluid physics on evaporation at the contact line,” Chem. Eng. Comm, 2008; 196(5):658-696. |
Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., General Information for Hearing aid Users, Mar. 1998, p. 1-14. |
Valente, Strategies for Selecting and Verging Hearing Aid Fittings, Theme Medical Publishing. pp. 255-256, 1994. |
Widex Hearing Aid Co, Users's Instructions, Senso CIC and Mini Canal. Feb. 1997, pp. 2-27. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100322452 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61218591 | Jun 2009 | US | |
60542776 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11053656 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11874011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11874011 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 12819066 | US |