Content page URL translation

Abstract

The present technology may translate a content of a web page such as content locator (e.g., a uniform resource locator (URL)) from a source language to a target language. The content locator may be associated with a content page. The translation may involve dividing the content locator into segment tokens in a first language, followed by translating, transliterating or not changing a segment token. The processed tokens are then reassembled in a second language. The translation may be provided by a translation module through a content page provided by a network browser.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The widespread use of the Internet allows people to view information from all over the world. People in one country may view web pages that are based in another country. Though this provides for widespread sharing of information, international web browsing may result in users of one country using one language viewing web content in a web page using a different language. As a result, people may not be able to read web page content from different countries using a different language.

Translation services for web pages exist but have several disadvantages. Typical web page translation services provide a translation of a sentence by detecting parts of the sentence, such as a noun, verb or other part. The translation of the sentence often relies on grammar rules for each language. Existing translation techniques do not apply well to content not having the structure of a sentence.

What is needed is an improved translation technique for web-based content.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present technology may translate a content of a web page such as content locator (e.g., a uniform resource locator (URL)) from a source language to a target language. The content locator may be associated with a content page such as a web page or a portion of content page. The translation may involve dividing the content locator into segment tokens in a first language, followed by translating, transliterating or not changing a segment token. The processed tokens are then reassembled in a second language. The translation may be provided by a translation module, such as a network browser plug in, through a content page provided by a network browser. The translation may be performed based on translation account settings associated with the user. The account may be maintained by a remote machine translation service.

In an embodiment, a content locator may be translated by receiving a request by a network browser for a content page located at a content locator. A content page and the content locator may be associated with a first language. Next, a translation may automatically be provided for the content locator in a second language by the network browser. The network browser may include a translation module configured to provide the translation of the content locator to the network browser.

According to some embodiments, the present technology may be directed to methods for translating a content locator. The methods may comprise: (a) determining at least one segment of the content locator; (b) transforming the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; and (c) transmitting the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.

According to other embodiments, the present technology may be directed to systems for translating a content locator. The systems may include: (a) a memory for storing executable instructions; (b) a processor for executing the executable instructions; (c) a translation module stored in memory and executable by the processor to: (i) determine at least one segment of the content locator; and (ii) transform the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; and (d) a communications module stored in memory and executable by the processor to transmit the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.

According to additional embodiments, the present technology may be directed to non-transitory computer readable storage media having a computer program embodied thereon, the computer program may be executed by a processor in a computing system to perform a method for translating a content locator. The method may comprise: (a) determining at least one segment of the content locator; (b) transforming the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; and (c) transmitting the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Certain embodiments of the present technology are illustrated by the accompanying figures. It will be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that details not necessary for an understanding of the technology or that render other details difficult to perceive may be omitted. It will be understood that the technology is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network browser interface with content locator translations.

FIG. 2A is a block diagram of an exemplary system for providing machine translation.

FIG. 2B is a block diagram of an exemplary network-based translation application.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for providing a translation of a content locator.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for translating a content locator.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for translating a content locator.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary computing device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Generally speaking, the use of non-roman characters in content locators such as uniform resource locators URLs has recently gained the approval of Internet authorities. Non-limiting examples of content locators include uniform resource indicators, uniform resource locators, uniform resource names, domain names, and so forth. One non-limiting example of a URL that comprises only roman characters includes http://www.example.com.

An exemplary content locator such as a domain name with non-roman characters may include www..com. End users who browse the Internet may encounter such URLs and may not be able to understand them. Such non-roman URLs may confuse end users who are only familiar with roman character URLs, or those not familiar with the language of the URL.

Translation of these non-standard URLs may not be amicable to typical Machine Translation (MT) systems and methods because such technology translates content in traditional sentence formats. Often times, web addresses are not in any discernible sentence format. Web addresses may include multiple combined words, abbreviations, and other combinations of characters that may or may not have a sentence structure.

The present technology may transform non-roman URLs from a source language into one or more target languages. The term transformation may include, but is not limited to, methods for converting characters or groups of characters from a source language into one or more target languages such as translation, transliteration, along with other processes that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art with the present disclosure before them. Exemplary uses for such technology may include situations when an end user encounters a foreign web page (e.g., web page with content and content locators in a different language from their natural language) and is unable to read the URL. The present technology may provide mechanisms by which the end user may mouse over the URL box and generate a translation of the URL into one or more additional languages (for example, the language specified in the language preference of the browser). In additional embodiments, the present technology may automatically convert the content locators.

The present technology may translate a content of a web page such as content locator from a source language to a target language. The content locator may be associated with a content page such as a web page or a portion of content page. The translation may involve dividing the content locator into segment tokens in a first language, followed by translating, transliterating, or not changing a segment token. The processed tokens are then reassembled in a second language. The translation may be provided by a translation module, such as a network browser plugin, through a content page provided by a network browser. The translation may be performed based on translation account settings associated with the user or a common corporate account. Once downloaded and installed, the plugin may link to the account of a specific user within the company, and in other embodiments the plugin may be pointed to link to a common corporate account.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network browser interface with content locator translations. FIG. 1 includes an interface consisting of a content page 100 provided by a network browser.

Generally speaking, prior to accessing the content page 100, a translation plugin may be installed into the network browser. Examples of a network browser include “Internet Explorer” by Microsoft Corporation, “Firefox” by Mozilla, and other applications used for browsing content over a world wide web.

Once the plugin is installed, an end user may direct the translation plugin to “auto detect and translate to/from their source language setting (e.g., English)”. A plurality of selectable target languages may be available for selection from a dropdown list.

For the duration of a browsing session, or until the preference is changed, the system may automatically translate content locators from a source language to one or more target languages. That is, once the end user has specified one or more target languages, the end user may enter a URL into the network browser, in source language such as English. The end user may then click on the plugin, which causes the system to automatically translate the URL into the closest match based on how the URL is segmented, along with which segments are transliterated, translated, and which segments remain unchanged.

It will be understood that if an end user directs the network browser to a URL that is in a different language from the target language specified in the plugin and/or encounter a URL embedded in a web page where the URL is in another language, mousing over the URL should provide same combined translation/transliteration/no change combination visual output in the target language.

Content page 100 may include content page drop down menu 110, translation module menu 120, content page operation buttons 130, content locator window 140, text box 144, a first content window 150, a second content window 160, and a third content window 170.

Content page 100 of FIG. 1 may include typical features of a network browser. For example, content page drop down menu 110 may include menus for file commands, edit commands, browsing history commands and bookmark commands. The drop down menus are used to configure the content page and the network browser operation. Content page operation buttons 130 may include a back button, forward button, refresh button, stop button and home button. These buttons are typical to those provided in a network browser interface.

Translation module menu 120 may be provided by a translation module and allows a user of the network browser to indicate a language in which to provide a translation of a content locator. The translation module menu 120 may be a “pull down” menu with a list of languages. A user may select a target language from translation module menu 120. Translated content will be provided in the selected target language.

Content locator window 140 may provide the content locator for the current page provided through the network browser. In some embodiments, the content locator window 140 may provide a uniform resource locator (URL) for the current content page provided by the network browser. For example, when a cursor is placed over the content locator window 140 as indicated in FIG. 1, a text box may be presented with a translation of the content locator in a target language as indicated by a text box 144. The translation of the content locator is part translator token and part copy. In some embodiments, the translation of the content locator may be presented to the user in a different way, such as within content locator window 140. The translation may be initiated by another type of input or event.

The first content window 150 indicates textual content which reads “all right kandalz”. The second content window 160 illustrates four graphic images 162, 164, 166, and 168 depicting different types of candles. The third content window 170 includes a list of items associated with links. A corresponding content locator text box is provided for selected links. The text links are associated with different content pages, in this case within the domain of the present content page. When a cursor is placed over a link, or an object associated with a link, a translation for the link is provided in a target language. For example, the list includes “Holiday Candles”, “Kandalz Locations”, “No Scent” and a “contact” text. Cursor 175 is placed over the “Holiday Candles” text. Accordingly, a content locator text box with a translation of the link associated with the text is provided as text box 176. Cursor 177 is placed over the “No Scent” text, and a content locator text box 178 is provided with a translation of the corresponding link.

FIG. 2A is a block diagram of an exemplary system 200 for providing machine translation. The system of FIG. 2A included computing device 205, network 225, third party web server 250, web server 230 and application server 235.

Computing device 205 communicates with network 225 and includes network browser 210. Computing device 205 may also include client translation application 220, which may operate similarly to network-based translation application 240 on the application server 235. Network browser 210 may be used to provide an interface such as that shown in FIG. 1. Examples of a network browser include “Internet Explorer” by Microsoft Corporation, “Firefox” by Mozilla, and other applications used for browsing content over a world wide web.

Translation module 215 may be used to coordinate a translation of a content locator or other content provided through a network browser interface including a content page, such as a URL processed with network browser 210. The translation module 215 may determine a target language to translate the content locator to, manage the translation and provide the translation through the network browser 210.

Network 225 may be a public or private local area network, wide area network, cloud-based networks or other network, or combinations of networks for facilitating the transfer of data between one or more devices or servers.

Third party web server 250 may include content page data provided through network browser 210. In particular, third party web server 250 may include third party web site content 255, which is provided through network browser 210. The content page data may be associated with a content locator.

Web server 230 may communicate with network 225 and application server 235 and may process requests received from computing device 205 over network 225. Web server 230 may process requests for content itself and request that application server 235 to process a received request. Application server 235 may provide a web-based application such as network-based translation application 240. Network-based translation application 240 may be an application server 235 or may be implemented as a client application (such as client translation application 220).

FIG. 2B is a block diagram of an exemplary network-based translation application 240. Network-based translation application 240 may perform a translation in response to information received from translation module 215 of computing device 205.

Network-based translation application 240 may include communications module 260, interface module 265, translation engine 270, and quality prediction engine 275. Network-based translation application 240 may be executed to manage communication with a customer through customer computing device 205, interface with remote devices, translate a document to generate translated content, and provide a quality prediction of a generated translation. It is noteworthy that the network-based translation application 240 may include additional or fewer modules, engines, or components, and still fall within the scope of the present technology. As used herein, the term “module” may also refer to any of an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.

Communications module 260 may be executed to allow an indication to be received via a user interface to provide a translation of a document from a source language to a target language, as well as a prediction of a trust level of the translation. The communications module 260 may also facilitate accessing the document to be translated such as in response to an indication by a user.

The interface module 265 can be executed to provide a graphical user interface through a network browser 210, for example as a content page provided by a web browser, which enables a user to request the translation and corresponding trust-level prediction.

The translation engine 270 comprises a machine translation engine capable of translating from a source language to a target language. Such translation capability may result from training the translation engine 270 on various training data. In some embodiments, the network-based translation application 240 may include more than one translation engine 270. Additionally, the translation engine 270 may be based on statistical-translation techniques, non-statistical-translation techniques, or a combination thereof.

As depicted in FIG. 2B, the translation engine 270 is associated with the training dataset 280. According to other exemplary embodiments, the translation engine 270 can be associated with any number of training datasets. The training dataset 280 may comprise documents in source languages and corresponding translations of those documents in target languages (i.e., parallel corpora). The translated documents may be human-generated or machine-generated. The training dataset 280 may be domain-specific or generic.

According to exemplary embodiments, the quality-prediction engine 275 is executable to predict a trust level of a translation provided by the translation engine 270. The trust-level prediction is indicative of translational accuracy of translations generated by the translation engine 270. The granularity of the trust-level prediction may extend from translations or transliterations of single characters, segments of characters, or an entire content locator. The trust level is predicted independent of a human-generated translation or other human intervention.

An example of network-based translation application 240 is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/572,021, entitled “Providing Machine-Generated Translation and Corresponding Trust Levels,” which was filed on Oct. 1, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an exemplary method 300 for providing a translation of a content locator. First, translation settings for a user account are set at step 310. It will be understood that in embodiments where the translation module 215 includes a plugin, the establishment of a user account may or may not be required. The translation settings may be set through a web service, for example, through web server 230 and stored by application server 235. The settings may identify translation and parameters for performing a translation on behalf of methods to a particular user, such as use of a dictionary, training system, weighting information, and other data. Translation settings may also include settings associated with quality level of a translation and other parameters of a translation.

A translation module 215 may be configured with a second language for a network browser 210 at step 320. A translation module, such as translation module 215 within a network browser 210, may receive input of a target language selection to which a URL or content locator may be translated. A translation module 215 may be implemented as a network browser plugin and may provide a drop down menu or other input mechanism for a user to select one or more target languages. In other embodiments, the translation module 215 may be implemented as an add in, script code or another suitable implementation (either hardware or software) within the network browser 210 or in communication with network browser 210 on computing device 205. When executed, the translation module 215 may accept an input of a selected language to utilize for translating content.

A request may be received for a content page located at a content locator at step 330. The request may be received as an input URL entered into the content locator window 140 of the content page 100, selection of a link or other content page portion that requires the content page be provided with a network browser 210, or a portion of a page such as an updated image or a frame within a content browser. The content locator may be an address or location at which content is stored, such as, for example, a URL.

A content page (or portion thereof) associated with a first language may be retrieved by a network browser 210 at step 340. The request may be sent to a web server 230 over a network. The web server 230 receives the request, processes the request and sends a content page to the requesting device back over the network, such as network 225. Processing the request may include providing the requested content directly via web server 230 or for web server 230 to query application server 235 for the requested content.

A content page may be provided in a first language through a network browser at step 350. At step 360, a content locator translation may be automatically provided in a second language by a network browser 210. The content locator translation may be provided based on several settings. The content locator may be translated according to one or more settings made by a user in their translation account. The content locator may be translated based on the target language selected by the user through preferences specified in a network browser 210 and the resulting content locator will be provided through the network browser interface. The content locator translation may provide a response to an input, such as placing a cursor over a URL window, or may be provided automatically. More detail for providing a content locator translation in a second window by a network browser 210 is discussed below with respect to the method of FIG. 4.

A selection is received with a portion of a content page associated with a second content locator at step 370. The selection may be a selection of a link, image, content page frame or some other portion of a content page. The content locator may be associated with the selected content page portion. At step 380, the translation of the second content locator is automatically provided. The second content locator may be associated with the selected content page portion. The second content locator may be translated similarly to the first content locator translation as discussed above with respect to step 360.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for translating a content locator. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 4 provides more detail for step 360 in the method of FIG. 3. A content locator is accessed at step 410. The content locator may be accessed by translation module 215. The translation module 215 may then send the content locator data as well as the selected target language, such as an indicator of the target language, to network-based translation application 240.

The content locator may be parsed into segment tokens based on translation settings at step 420. The translation may be performed by network-based translation application 240. The URL or content locator may be parsed to identify any recognized words in a first language within the content locator. Parsing may be performed within domain levels (for example, within back slashes of the content locator expression). Words may be identified by, for example using a dictionary, training sets of texts, and other data.

According to some embodiments, characters or segments not identified as a word within the content locator may then be analyzed to determine if they can be transliterated. Transliteration is a process which identifies a character in one language which may be translated into one or more characters of another language. Portions of the content locator which cannot be translated or transliterated may then be copied without translation.

In some instances, it may be appropriate to select a best translation for a segment token, such as when multiple possible translations for a content locator are determined by the translation module. Therefore, the method may include a step 430 of determining a best translation of the segment token may. The best translation may be based on known words, the context of the segment token, translations and/or transliteration, weighting, and other information. Determining a best translation of segment tokens is discussed in more detail below with respect to the method of FIG. 5.

A content locator may be provided in the form of a best translation of segment tokens within a content page at step 440. The content locator may be provided in a content page 100, for example within a text box 144, a content locator window 140 or URL window, or in some other manner.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for translating a content locator. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 5 provides more detail for step 430 in the method of FIG. 4. Translation of a content locator may be based on several factors, such as a known translation, context information, and other features. The method of FIG. 5 utilizes both known translation and context information to optimize the translation of a content locator.

A combination of the token segments with the most words for the translation tokens is determined at step 510. Each token may have multiple translations, such as a word translation or transliteration, or multiple words or transliterations based on a probability structure. This plurality of translations may be referred to as a plurality of possible translations. A combination of token translations with the most known words is determined for the content locator at step 510.

Next, a context score is determined based on content page text and content locator text at step 520. The context score may be based on a match of a word to the subject matter of the content page, a word match, or other information. For example, a particular web page may be associated with a travel type subject matter, and thus words in the URL associated with travel may be determined to be a higher context score than words not associated with travel. Context may also be determined by matching identified words or transliteration content in the content locator to words detected in a content page, other tokens in web sites associated with the current domain and other related data.

A combination of tokens is determined that is most relevant to the context at step 530. The most relevant combination may be determined based on page content, other URLs, subject matters of a trained system and other data. The most relevant combination has the most words determined to match the content or have the highest average relevancy score.

The weighting of known words vs. most relevant words is retrieved as part of the translation settings for the user at step 540. Different weightings may be set for a recognized word, relevant word or other segment token or other content comprising the translation. The weightings may be retrieved as part of the account settings for a particular user. The weightings may be applied for each known word or relevant token translation within the content locator.

Content locator words are selected based on weighting and settings for a user at step 550. The combination with the highest score may be selected as the content locator translation.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary computing device. The computing device of FIG. 6 may be used to implement computing device 205, web server 230, application server 235 and third party web server 250. The computing system 600 includes one or more processors 610 and main memory 620. Main memory 620 stores, in part, instructions and data for execution by processor 610. Main memory 620 can store the executable code when in operation. The computing system 600 further includes a mass storage device 630, portable storage medium drive(s) 640, output devices 650, user input devices 660, a display system 670, and peripheral device(s) 680.

The components shown in FIG. 6 are depicted as being connected via a single bus 690. The components may be connected through one or more data transport means. The processor 610 and the main memory 620 may be connected via a local microprocessor bus, and the mass storage device 630, the peripheral devices 680, the portable storage medium drive(s) 640, and display system 670 may be connected via one or more input/output (I/O) buses.

The mass storage device 630, which may be implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by the processor 610. The mass storage device 630 can store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology for purposes of loading that software into the main memory 620.

The portable storage medium drive(s) 640 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or Universal Serial Bus (USB) storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 600 of FIG. 6. The system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology may be stored on such a portable medium and input to the computer system 600 via the portable storage medium drive(s) 640.

The input devices 660 provide a portion of a user interface. The input devices 660 may include an alpha-numeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alpha-numeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. Additionally, the computing system 600 as shown in FIG. 6 includes the output devices 650. Suitable output devices include speakers, printers, network interfaces, and monitors.

The display system 670 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. The display system 670 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.

The peripheral device(s) 680 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system. The peripheral device(s) 680 may include a modem or a router.

The components contained in the computer system 600 of FIG. 6 are those typically found in computer systems that may be suitable for use with embodiments of the present technology and are intended to represent a broad category of such computer components that are well known in the art. Thus, the computer system 600 of FIG. 6 can be a personal computer, hand held computing device, telephone, mobile computing device, workstation, server, minicomputer, mainframe computer, or any other computing device. The computer can also include different bus configurations, networked platforms, multi-processor platforms, etc. Various operating systems can be used including Unix, Linux, Windows, Macintosh OS, Palm OS, webOS, Android, iPhone OS and other suitable operating systems.

It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. Computer-readable storage media refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a central processing unit (CPU), a processor, a microcontroller, or the like. Such media can take forms including, but not limited to, non-volatile and volatile media such as optical or magnetic disks and dynamic memory, respectively. Common forms of computer-readable storage media include a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic storage medium, a Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM) disk, Digital Video Disk (DVD), any other optical storage medium, Random Access Memory (RAM), Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), a Flash EPROM, and any other memory chip or cartridge.

Various forms of transmission media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a CPU for execution. A bus carries the data to system RAM, from which a CPU retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by system RAM can optionally be stored on a fixed disk either before or after execution by a CPU.

While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the technology to the particular forms set forth herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that the above description is illustrative and not restrictive. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the technology should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for translating a content locator, the method comprising: determining at least one segment of the content locator;generating a plurality of possible transformations of the at least one segment;calculating a context score for each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing each of the possible transformations to subject matter included in a document associated with the content locator;ranking each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing the context scores of the plurality of possible transformations to one another;transforming the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; andtransmitting the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein determining comprises: determining one or more words included in the content locator that are to be translated from the source language into the target language, each of the one or more words being separated from the content locator as a segment; andanalyzing the remaining portion of the content locator to determine one or more characters or words that are to be transliterated from the source language into the target language.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: integrating back into the content locator, the at least one segment which was transformed; andtransmitting the content locator having the integrated at least one segment to the client device.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising receiving an indication of a content locator that is to be translated, the indication generated by selection of the content locator by an input device coupled to the client device.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein transformation comprises: generating a trust value for the transformation of the at least one segment, the trust value including an accuracy for the transformation; andutilizing the transformation of the at least one segment if the trust value for the at least one segment meets or exceeds a threshold value.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the content locator includes any of a uniform resource locator, a uniform resource indicator, a uniform resource name, a domain name, and combinations thereof.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: assigning a weight to each of the plurality of possible transformations, the weight being based upon a relative comparison of a possible transformation to a word in a parallel corpora; andselecting a possible transformation with the highest weight based upon the comparison.

8. A method for transforming a content locator, the method comprising: determining the content locator into two or more segments;generating a plurality of possible transformations of the two or more segments;calculating a context score for each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing each of the possible transformations to subject matter included in a document associated with the content locator;ranking each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing the context scores of the plurality of possible transformations to one another;transforming at least one of the two or more segments from a source language into at least one target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; andcombining the two or more segments together before transmitting the combined segments to a client device.

9. A system for translating a content locator, the system comprising: a memory for storing executable instructions; a processor for executing the executable instructions;a translation module stored in memory and executable by the processor to: determine at least one segment of the content locator; andtransform the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration;a quality prediction engine that: calculates a context score for each of a plurality of possible transformations by comparing each of the possible transformations to subject matter included in a document associated with the content locator; andranks each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing the context scores of the plurality of possible transformations to one another; anda communications module stored in memory and executable by the processor to transmit the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.

10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the translation module further: determines one or more words included in the content locator that are to be translated from the source language into the target language, each of the one or more words being identified as a segment; andanalyzes the remaining portion of the content locator to determine one or more characters or words that are to be transliterated from the source language into the target language.

11. The system according to claim 9, wherein the translation module further integrates into the content locator the at least one segment which was transformed; and the communications module transmits the content locator having at least a portion that has been transformed from the source language into the target language.

12. The system according to claim 9, wherein the communications module receives an indication of a content locator that is to be translated, the indication generated by selection of the content locator by an input device coupled to the client device.

13. The system according to claim 9, wherein the quality prediction engine: generates a trust value for the transformation of the at least one segment, the trust value including an accuracy for the transformation; andutilizes the transformation of the at least one segment if the trust value for the at least one segment meets or exceeds a threshold value.

14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the quality prediction engine further: assigns a weight to each of the plurality of possible transformations, the weight being based upon a relative comparison of a possible transformation to a word in a parallel corpora; andselects a possible transformation with the highest weight based upon the comparison.

15. The system according to claim 9, wherein the content locator includes any of a uniform resource locator, a uniform resource indicator, a uniform resource name, a domain name, and combinations thereof.

16. The system according to claim 9, wherein the translation module includes a plugin that cooperates with a network browser that resides on the client device.

17. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having a computer program embodied thereon, the computer program executable by a processor in a computing system to perform a method for translating a content locator, the method comprising: determining at least one segment of the content locator;generating a plurality of possible transformations of the at least one segment;calculating a context score for each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing each of the transformations to subject matter included in a document associated with the content locator;ranking each of the plurality of possible transformations by comparing the context scores of the plurality of possible transformations to one another;transforming the at least one segment from a source language into a target language by at least one of translation or transliteration; andtransmitting the transformed at least one segment in the target language for display on a network browser of a client device.