Users may spend a significant amount of time navigating between network addresses by using a computing device, such as to “surf the web.” For example, users may navigate between a variety of different webpages provided via a variety of different websites to view and interact with content of interest.
To draw users, the content available from the network addresses continues to provide an ever increasing richness for viewing by users. This may include use of rich graphics, dynamic scripts, animations, audio, streaming content, and so on. However, the richness of this content may cause delays in navigation to access these network addresses, which may decrease a user's experience and therefore counteract the purpose of a service provider in making this content available to the users.
Content pre-render and pre-fetch techniques are described. In one or more implementations, a likelihood is predicted of subsequent navigation to content associated with a network address based at least in part on monitored navigation performed by a computing device to one or more network addresses. A determination is then made whether to cause the computing device to pre-fetch and pre-render the content based at least in part on the prediction.
In one or more implementations, a system includes one or more modules implemented at least partially in hardware. The one or more modules are configured to perform operations that include computing a confidence score indicating a relative likelihood of subsequent navigation to content associated with a network address based at least in part on monitored navigation performed by a computing device to one or more network addresses. Responsive to a determination that the confidence score meets a pre-render threshold for the subsequent navigation, the content associated with the network address is caused to be pre-fetched and pre-rendered by the computing device. Responsive to a determination that the confidence score meets a pre-fetch threshold for the subsequent navigation but does not meet the pre-render threshold for the subsequent navigation, the content associated with the network address is caused to be pre-fetched but not pre-rendered by the computing device.
In one or more implementations, a system includes one or more modules implemented at least partially in hardware. The one or more modules are configured to perform operations that include generating navigation data based on monitored navigation performed by a plurality of different computing devices to access a plurality of different network addresses and exposing the navigation data for use by a computing device to predict subsequent navigation by the computing device to one or more network addresses, at least part of the predicted navigation not involving a link included in a current content item accessed by the computing device.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items. Entities represented in the figures may be indicative of one or more entities and thus reference may be made interchangeably to single or plural forms of the entities in the discussion.
A user experience involved in navigation between network addresses (e.g., webpages) may be improved by pre-rendering content located at network addresses associated with likely user navigation. For example, to pre-render a web page, a browser or other web-enabled application may download resources associated with the content of the page and then construct that page. Therefore, when the user navigates to the pre-rendered webpage, the page may be displayed without waiting for the content to be obtained and rendered as these operations have already occurred.
However, pre-rendering of content may be considered a relatively expensive operation in terms of computing device resource usage. Therefore, techniques are described herein in which a likelihood that a user will cause a computing device to navigate to a particular network address may be used as a basis to determine whether to pre-render content available via a network address. For example, a confidence score may be computed as part of a prediction for navigation to a particular website. This computation may be based on a variety of factors, such use of navigation data that describes a sequence of navigations made by other users in a similar situation. Therefore, this group browsing history may be used to determine a likely destination as well as a confidence score detailing how likely that navigation is to occur.
If the confidence score indicates a relatively high likelihood (e.g., through comparison with a pre-render threshold), the content may be pre-fetched and pre-rendered by the computing device. In another instance, the confidence score may indicate that although the navigation is likely, the navigation is not likely enough to justify pre-rendering of the content, such as to meet a pre-fetch threshold but not the pre-render threshold. In such an instance, the content may be pre-fetched but not pre-rendered, e.g., the content is downloaded. In this way, the computing device may leverage these relative likelihoods to support increased functionality and efficiency, such as to support use of a “flip ahead” function in a browser. A variety of other examples are also contemplated, further discussion of which may be found in relation to the following sections.
In the following discussion, an example environment is first described that may employ the techniques described herein. Example procedures are then described which may be performed in the example environment as well as other environments. Consequently, performance of the example procedures is not limited to the example environment and the example environment is not limited to performance of the example procedures.
For example, a computing device may be configured as a computer that is capable of communicating over the network 108, such as a desktop computer, a mobile station, an entertainment appliance, a set-top box communicatively coupled to a display device, a wireless phone, a game console, and so forth. Thus, the computing device 102 may range from full resource devices with substantial memory and processor resources (e.g., personal computers, game consoles) to a low-resource device with limited memory and/or processing resources (e.g., traditional set-top boxes, hand-held game consoles). Additionally, a computing device may be representative of a plurality of different devices, such as multiple servers utilized by a business to perform operations such as by the service provider 104 or network addresses 106, a remote control and set-top box combination, an image capture device and a game console configured to capture gestures, and so on.
Although the network 108 is illustrated as the Internet, the network may assume a wide variety of configurations. For example, the network 108 may include a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network, a public telephone network, an intranet, and so on. Further, although a single network 108 is shown, the network 108 may be representative of a plurality of networks.
The computing device 102 is further illustrated as including a communication module 110. The communication module 110 is representative of functionality that is configured to interact with the network address 106 and/or the service provider 104 via the network 108. As such, the communication module 110 may be configured in a variety of ways. For example, the communication module 110 may be configured as a browser that is configured to “surf the web.” The communication module 110 may also be configured as part of a network-enabled application (e.g., a web-enabled app), a plug-in module, part of an operating system, and so on. Thus, network access functionality represented by the communication module 110 may be implemented in a variety of different ways.
The communication module 110 is also illustrated as including a navigation monitoring module 112. The navigation monitoring module 112 is representative of functionality to monitor navigation of the communication module 110 (and thus the computing device 102) to interact with the different network addresses 106, e.g., to access content via the network addresses 106. This may include generating data that describes a sequence of interaction with the network addresses 106, a context regarding those interactions, and so on.
The navigation monitoring module 112, for instance, may monitor a navigation sequence that involves selection of a favorite network address (e.g., website) in a browser, selection of a link within a webpage provided by that website, navigation to another website that involves typing in a network address 106, and so on. Further, this monitored navigation may include data describing a context of the navigation, such as a time of day, day of week, month, how the access was performed (e.g., selection of a link, typing of an address, search result), and so forth.
Data obtained from this monitored interaction may then be provided to a navigation manager module 114 of the service provider 104. The navigation manager module 114 is representative of functionality to obtain and manage data obtained from a plurality of computing devices that describes monitored navigation. This data may be leveraged in a variety of ways, such as a “group history” that describes navigation by the plurality of computing devices. This group history may then be used to support a variety of different functionality, such as to predict “to where” subsequent navigation that is performed by the computing device 102 will occur.
The navigation manager module 114, for instance, may be configured to generate navigation data 116 that is maintained in storage 118 associated with the service provider 104. This navigation data 116 may then be communicated to the computing device 102 for use by a navigation prediction module 120. The navigation prediction module 120 is representative of functionality to predict likely subsequent navigation by a computing device 102 and thus may leverage the navigation data 116 to make this prediction, further discussion of which may be found in the discussion of
Further, as a part of making the prediction, the navigation prediction module 120 may compute an amount of confidence in the prediction, i.e., a confidence score. Thus, a determination may be made as to which actions are to be performed based on the amount of confidence in the prediction, further discussion of which may be found in relation to
The navigation manager module 114 may then collect this data in storage 118 from a plurality of computing devices in a similar manner and use this information as a group browsing history to generate network data 116. The network data 116, for instance, may include one or more sequences of network addresses 204.
These sequences may then be used as part of a prediction made by the navigation prediction module 120 to predict a likely next destination for navigation of the communication module 110. For example, the sequences may involve navigation within a website, such as selection of a series of links. Therefore, when navigation of the communication module 110 is monitored as performing similar navigation this sequence may be leveraged to predict a likely next link to be selected by a user. In another example, this navigation may include manual entry of network addresses, selection from a favorites list, and so on, such as to navigate between webpages. Even in this instance, this sequence may be leveraged to predict a likely next destination as part of subsequent navigation to be performed by the communication module 110.
The navigation data 116 may also include one or more navigation rules 206 that may be applied by the navigation prediction module 120 as part of the prediction. A navigation rule 206, for instance, may specify that a link “next page,” if included in content currently accessed by the communication module 110, has a relatively high likelihood of selection by a user. Likewise, other characteristics of currently accessed content may be leveraged by the navigation prediction module 120 as part of making the prediction. The navigation rules 206 may also be applied to a variety of other criteria monitored by the navigation monitoring module, e.g., that a selection of a link “3” is likely after selection of links “1” and “2”, and so on. Thus, in this example the navigation data 116 is provided to the computing device 102 for local usage by the navigation prediction module 120 in making the prediction. Other examples are also contemplated, such as through use by the service provider 104 to predict navigation that is likely to occur by the computing device.
The navigation prediction module 120 may then employ this data describing currently monitored navigation 302 along with navigation data 116 received from the service provider 102 to make a prediction regarding subsequent navigation. As before, this may be based on a sequence of navigation, characteristics of content, and so on. Further, the navigation prediction module 120 may employ a confidence score calculation module 304 that is representative of functionality to compute a confidence score 306 regarding the prediction. The confidence score 306 may thus be thought of as a computation of how likely the predicted outcome will occur, i.e., subsequent navigation to a particular network address. The may be utilized in a variety of ways.
For example a content retrieval module 308 may obtain the confidence score 306. If the confidence score meets a pre-fetch threshold, content 310 associated with the prediction may be pre-fetched, e.g., obtained via the network. The content 310, for instance, may include text 312, graphics 314, code 316, data describing a layout 318, links 320, and other 322 data. Therefore, this obtained data may be “ready for rendering” but is not in a rendered state that is suitable for display without further processing.
If the confidence score also meets a pre-render threshold, the content 310 obtained via the pre-fetch may be passed to a renderer 324 for processing into a rendered form 326 that is ready for display by a display device. For example, the renderer 324 may parse the layout 318, render vector graphics 314, execute code 316 (e.g., dynamic runtime code), and so on. This processing, for instance, may be performed as part of a graphics processing unit of the computing device 102, although other functionality may also be leveraged as part of this rendering.
Thus, the confidence score may be tied to different amounts of computing device resource usage to improve efficiency of the computing device. As previously described, for instance, pre-rendering of content may be considered a relatively expensive operation in terms of computing device resource usage. Therefore, a pre-rendering threshold may be tied to a relatively high degree of confidence in a prediction before pre-rendering of content is permitted.
However, a pre-fetch of content 310 is not as computationally expensive as a pre-render and therefore a pre-fetch threshold may be employed that is lower than the pre-render threshold to determine whether the content 310 is to be pre-fetched. Thus, in some instances the content may not be fetched at all (e.g., when a confidence score 306 is below a pre-fetch threshold), the content may be pre-fetched but not pre-rendered (e.g., when the confidence score 206 is between the pre-fetch and pre-render thresholds), or the content may be pre-fetched and pre-rendered (e.g., when the confidence score 306 is above a pre-render threshold). Pre-rendering of content may be performed in a variety of ways, an example of which is described as follows and shown in a corresponding figure.
A prediction is made by the navigation prediction module 120 that a second webpage in the series is likely to be the next destination in the user's navigation. This prediction may be performed in a variety of ways as previously described, which in this instance may be based on identification of particular links in the webpage (e.g., next page), identification that multiple links point to a same network address (e.g., “2” and “next page”), and so on.
Accordingly, an “invisible tab” may be allocated which although shown in phantom in the figure is not viewable by a user. Content of the predicted web page may then be rendered to this invisible tab, which may include running dynamic runtime code, rendering graphics, obtaining additional content for other network addresses (e.g., ads), and so on.
Therefore, when a use provide an input to navigate to the predicted content, content in the invisible tab may be used to replace the previous content as shown in the second stage 404. These techniques may continue, e.g., to pre-render a third webpage in the sequence. In this way, a user's subsequent navigation to network addresses may be performed with increased efficiency yet still conserve resources of the computing device. This may be leveraged to support a variety of different functionality, such as to “flip ahead” to additional webpages that are predicted by the computing device. Further discussion of these and other techniques may be found in relation to the following procedures.
The following discussion describes content pre-render and pre-fetch techniques that may be implemented utilizing the previously described systems and devices. Aspects of each of the procedures may be implemented in hardware, firmware, or software, or a combination thereof. The procedures are shown as a set of blocks that specify operations performed by one or more devices and are not necessarily limited to the orders shown for performing the operations by the respective blocks. In portions of the following discussion, reference will be made to
Navigation data is generated based on the monitored navigation performed by a plurality of different computing devices to access a plurality of different network addresses (block 504). The navigation data 116, for instance, may include network addresses 204, navigation rules 206, and so on.
The navigation data is exposed for use by a computing device to predict subsequent navigation by a computing device to one or more network addresses (block 506). The service provider 104, for instance, may expose the navigation data 116 for use by a computing device 102 is predicting subsequent navigation. Other examples are also contemplated, such as for use by the service provider 104 itself in making the prediction. An example of one technique that may be used to make a prediction may be found below.
A determination is then made whether to cause the computing device to pre-fetch and pre-render the content based at least in part on the prediction (block 604). For example, a confidence score may be computed that indicates a relative likelihood of subsequent navigation to content associated with a network address based at least in part on monitored navigation performed by a computing device to one or more network addresses (block 606).
Responsive to a determination that the confidence score meets a pre-render threshold for the subsequent navigation, the content associated with the network address is caused to be pre-fetched and pre-rendered by the computing device (block 608). Thus, a relatively strong confidence score associated with a prediction may be used as a basis to determine whether to pre-render the content, which as previously described may be computationally expensive.
Responsive to a determination that the confidence score meets a pre-fetch threshold for the subsequent navigation but does not meet the pre-render threshold for the subsequent navigation, the content associated with the network address is caused to be pre-fetched but not pre-rendered by the computing device (block 610). Continuing with the previous example, a determination may be made that although a prediction is likely, it is not likely enough based on the confidence score to assume the expense of pre-rendering the content. Therefore, in this instance the content may be pre-fetched but not pre-rendered, with rendering waiting until a user indicates a desire to navigate to that network address. A variety of other examples are also contemplated as previously described.
In the example system 700, multiple devices are interconnected through a central computing device. The central computing device may be local to the multiple devices or may be located remotely from the multiple devices. In one embodiment, the central computing device may be a cloud of one or more server computers that are connected to the multiple devices through a network, the Internet, or other data communication link. In one embodiment, this interconnection architecture enables functionality to be delivered across multiple devices to provide a common and seamless experience to a user of the multiple devices. Each of the multiple devices may have different physical requirements and capabilities, and the central computing device uses a platform to enable the delivery of an experience to the device that is both tailored to the device and yet common to all devices. In one embodiment, a class of target devices is created and experiences are tailored to the generic class of devices. A class of devices may be defined by physical features, types of usage, or other common characteristics of the devices.
In various implementations, the computing device 102 may assume a variety of different configurations, such as for computer 702, mobile 704, and television 706 uses. Each of these configurations includes devices that may have generally different constructs and capabilities, and thus the computing device 102 may be configured according to one or more of the different device classes. For instance, the computing device 102 may be implemented as the computer 702 class of a device that includes a personal computer, desktop computer, a multi-screen computer, laptop computer, netbook, and so on.
The computing device 102 may also be implemented as the mobile 704 class of device that includes mobile devices, such as a mobile phone, portable music player, portable gaming device, a tablet computer, a multi-screen computer, and so on. The computing device 102 may also be implemented as the television 706 class of device that includes devices having or connected to generally larger screens in casual viewing environments. These devices include televisions, set-top boxes, gaming consoles, and so on. The techniques described herein may be supported by these various configurations of the computing device 102 and are not limited to the specific examples the techniques described herein.
The cloud 708 includes and/or is representative of a platform 710 for content services 712. The platform 710 abstracts underlying functionality of hardware (e.g., servers) and software resources of the cloud 708. The content services 712 may include applications and/or data that can be utilized while computer processing is executed on servers that are remote from the computing device 102. Content services 712 can be provided as a service over the Internet and/or through a subscriber network, such as a cellular or Wi-Fi network.
The platform 710 may abstract resources and functions to connect the computing device 102 with other computing devices. The platform 710 may also serve to abstract scaling of resources to provide a corresponding level of scale to encountered demand for the content services 712 that are implemented via the platform 710. Accordingly, in an interconnected device embodiment, implementation of functionality of the functionality described herein may be distributed throughout the system 700. For example, the functionality may be implemented in part on the computing device 102 as well as via the platform 710 that abstracts the functionality of the cloud 708.
Device 800 also includes communication interfaces 808 that can be implemented as any one or more of a serial and/or parallel interface, a wireless interface, any type of network interface, a modem, and as any other type of communication interface. The communication interfaces 808 provide a connection and/or communication links between device 800 and a communication network by which other electronic, computing, and communication devices communicate data with device 800.
Device 800 includes one or more processors 810 (e.g., any of microprocessors, controllers, and the like) which process various computer-executable instructions to control the operation of device 800 and to implement embodiments of the techniques described herein. Alternatively or in addition, device 800 can be implemented with any one or combination of hardware, firmware, or fixed logic circuitry that is implemented in connection with processing and control circuits which are generally identified at 812. Although not shown, device 800 can include a system bus or data transfer system that couples the various components within the device. A system bus can include any one or combination of different bus structures, such as a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a universal serial bus, and/or a processor or local bus that utilizes any of a variety of bus architectures.
Device 800 also includes computer-readable media 814, such as one or more memory components, examples of which include random access memory (RAM), non-volatile memory (e.g., any one or more of a read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, EPROM, EEPROM, etc.), and a disk storage device. A disk storage device may be implemented as any type of magnetic or optical storage device, such as a hard disk drive, a recordable and/or rewriteable compact disc (CD), any type of a digital versatile disc (DVD), and the like. Device 800 can also include a mass storage media device 816.
Computer-readable media 814 provides data storage mechanisms to store the device data 804, as well as various device applications 818 and any other types of information and/or data related to operational aspects of device 800. For example, an operating system 820 can be maintained as a computer application with the computer-readable media 814 and executed on processors 810. The device applications 818 can include a device manager (e.g., a control application, software application, signal processing and control module, code that is native to a particular device, a hardware abstraction layer for a particular device, etc.). The device applications 818 also include any system components or modules to implement embodiments of the techniques described herein. In this example, the device applications 818 include an interface application 822 and an input/output module 824 (which may be the same or different as input/output module 114) that are shown as software modules and/or computer applications. The input/output module 824 is representative of software that is used to provide an interface with a device configured to capture inputs, such as a touchscreen, track pad, camera, microphone, and so on. Alternatively or in addition, the interface application 822 and the input/output module 824 can be implemented as hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. Additionally, the input/output module 824 may be configured to support multiple input devices, such as separate devices to capture visual and audio inputs, respectively.
Device 800 also includes an audio and/or video input-output system 826 that provides audio data to an audio system 828 and/or provides video data to a display system 830. The audio system 828 and/or the display system 830 can include any devices that process, display, and/or otherwise render audio, video, and image data. Video signals and audio signals can be communicated from device 800 to an audio device and/or to a display device via an RF (radio frequency) link, S-video link, composite video link, component video link, DVI (digital video interface), analog audio connection, or other similar communication link. In an embodiment, the audio system 828 and/or the display system 830 are implemented as external components to device 800. Alternatively, the audio system 828 and/or the display system 830 are implemented as integrated components of example device 800.
Although the example implementations have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the implementations defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claimed features.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5247674 | Kogure | Sep 1993 | A |
5270103 | Oliver et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5564002 | Brown | Oct 1996 | A |
5588071 | Schultz | Dec 1996 | A |
5590327 | Biliris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5696675 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729704 | Stone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5781195 | Marvin | Jul 1998 | A |
5784699 | McMahon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801717 | Engstrom et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841439 | Pose et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844569 | Eisler et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870769 | Freund | Feb 1999 | A |
5918239 | Allen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5986670 | Dries et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6067093 | Grau et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091422 | Ouaknine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6182133 | Horvitz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191796 | Tarr | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226017 | Goossen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236410 | Politis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249289 | Arnaud et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6330003 | Curtis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335765 | Daly et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344855 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6411302 | Chiraz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426750 | Hoppe | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6501474 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504545 | Browne et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525722 | Deering | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6809745 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850967 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6864886 | Cavallaro | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6900813 | Stefanidis | May 2005 | B1 |
7031517 | Le et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7102635 | Shih | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127592 | Abraham et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130890 | Kumar | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133054 | Aguera y Arcas | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7307631 | Robart | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7342580 | Peterson | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7400322 | Urback | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7511718 | Subramanian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594093 | Kancherla | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7667715 | MacInnis | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7738688 | Eichhorn | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7792876 | Easwar | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7877708 | Zinn et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7941758 | Tremblay | May 2011 | B2 |
8010624 | Scott et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8161087 | Latzina | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8255818 | Bales et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284211 | Darsa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306399 | Trottier et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8307300 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8314809 | Grabowski et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8341245 | Roskind et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8438474 | Lloyd | May 2013 | B1 |
8549421 | Gohda et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020005854 | Deering et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005891 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015042 | Robotham et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049819 | Matsuda et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020075327 | Stall | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089547 | Huapaya | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094125 | Guo | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110057 | Kadlec et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163530 | Takakura et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020163542 | Costea et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030001847 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020719 | Abgrall | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030091232 | Kalevo et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030189597 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227460 | Schinnerer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229605 | Herrera et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003188 | Rao | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008212 | O'Neill | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040107380 | Vollschwitz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040150647 | Aleksic et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160446 | Gosalia et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160449 | Gossalia et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189668 | Beda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040212619 | Saito et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050035980 | Lonsing | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071777 | Roessler et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088447 | Hanggie | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050140683 | Collins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172098 | Worley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190178 | Taghavi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235124 | Pomaranski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283566 | Callaghan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060107229 | Matthews et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060200778 | Gritzman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248469 | Czerwinski et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060290705 | White | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013708 | Barcklay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018992 | Wong | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035543 | David et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040788 | Saha | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047760 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088768 | Passerini et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091098 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101066 | Al Sukhni | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113194 | Bales et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133900 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154087 | Cho et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070291044 | Xu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001962 | Lefebvre et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080100613 | Woo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136840 | Chang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140981 | Kim | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165268 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166033 | Bueno et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198168 | Jiao et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235292 | Janin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238928 | Poddar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244458 | Brugiolo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285074 | Wilson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291201 | Lafon | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298689 | Ashbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090102842 | Li | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090129635 | Abe | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141895 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172331 | Vembu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208110 | Hoppe et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210482 | Wynn et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213081 | Case, Jr. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213112 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090262122 | Darsa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284537 | Hong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322764 | Saini et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011316 | Sar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042945 | Bauchot et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073379 | Berger et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079480 | Murtagh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100169310 | Latzina | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207957 | Taneja et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100277504 | Song | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100278442 | Parsons et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281402 | Staikos et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289806 | Lao et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293504 | Hachiya | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309205 | Novosad | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313125 | Fleizach et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315319 | Cok et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321377 | Gay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325589 | Ofek et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022984 | van der Meulen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043553 | Brown Elliott et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069881 | Kitago | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072391 | Hanggie et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078624 | Missig et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110102440 | Yuen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138314 | Mir et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141123 | Kumar | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154248 | Tsuruoka | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173569 | Howes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110199377 | Jang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110252299 | Lloyd et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267370 | Tanaka | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110304699 | Ito et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120042252 | Neerudu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050313 | Gruber | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081368 | Park et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092335 | Kim et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102034 | Kim et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115600 | Dietrich et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151308 | Falkenberg et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120188342 | Gervautz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120213435 | Donovan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218381 | Uro et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229464 | Fishwick | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235933 | Yamamura et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249741 | Maciocci et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251003 | Perbet et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254780 | Mouton et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120324043 | Burkard et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007260 | Jain et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007590 | Rivera et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019159 | Civelli et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021262 | Chen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130050249 | Grabowski et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130073509 | Burkard et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073670 | Das et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130074080 | Jimenez | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093750 | Cornell et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130208012 | Ergan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130321453 | Fink | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321454 | Fink | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321455 | Fink | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321471 | Fink | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1806258 | Jul 2006 | CN |
WO-9522104 | Aug 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“DNS Prefetching and It's Privacy Implications: When Good Things Go Bad”—Krishnan et al, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Dec. 2010 https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/leet10/tech/full—papers/Krishnan.pdf. |
Ivan, “Google Adds Voice Search, Visual Search and Results Prerendering”, Retrieved at <<http://www.mt-soft.com.ar/2011/06/14/google-adds-voice-search-visual-search-and-results-prerendering/?utm—source=feedburner&utm—medium=feed&utm—campaign=Feed%3A+mtsoftblog+%28MT-Soft%29>>, Jun. 14, 2011, pp. 6. |
Lentell, Gour, “Amazon Silk and Cloud Browsers”, Retrieved at <<http://www.binu.com/2011/09/amazon-silk-and-cloud-browsers/>>, Sep. 30, 2011, pp. 3. |
“Speculative Render Ahead and Caching in Multiple Passes”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,299, filed Feb. 15, 2012, pp. 47. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,299, May 14, 2014, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,815, Nov. 19, 2014, 24 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,825, Jan. 26, 2015, 35 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,299, Nov. 6, 2014, 28 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,805, Nov. 6, 2014, 34 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Nov. 28, 2014, 29 pages. |
“Compositing Window Manager”, Retrieved from <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Compositing—window—manager&oldid=492324820> on Jul. 1, 2014, May 13, 2012, 11 pages. |
“Desktop Window Manager”, Retrieved from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/windex.php?title=Desktop—window—manager&oldid=425547889#External—links> on Jun. 3, 2014, Apr. 2011, 5 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,805, Jun. 26, 2014, 30 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,815, Jun. 11, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,825, Jun. 12, 2014, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Apr. 22, 2014, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Aug. 26, 2014, 24 pages. |
“IDCompositionVirtualSurface::Trim method”, Retrieved at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh449137(v=vs.85).aspx—on Jun. 15, 2012, 2 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/061010, Aug. 20, 2014, 11 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/041485, Oct. 11, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,825, Jan. 30, 2014, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,805, Dec. 19, 2013, 28 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,815, Sep. 23, 2014, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,815, Dec. 18, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,825, Oct. 2, 2014, 27 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Jun. 2, 2014, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Dec. 19, 2013, 21 pages. |
“Open GL Programming Guide”, Seventh Edition, The Official Guide to Learning Open GL, Versions 3.0 and 3.1. Addison-Wesley, Jul. 2009, 1019 pages. |
“Polygonal Modeling”, Retrieved from <http://web.archive.org/web/20120303001434/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygonal—modeling>, Mar. 3, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Spaces (software)”, Retrieved from <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spaces—%28software%29&oldid=467135782> on Jun. 2, 2014, Dec. 22, 2011, 3 pages. |
“Viewing Virtual Surface Aids Reclassification”, Retrieved at: http://www.microimages.com/documentation/TechGuides/77LASsurfReclas.pdf, Oct. 2010, 2 pages. |
“Working with Rendering Contexts”, Retrieved at: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/graphicsimaging/Conceptual/OpenGL-MacProgGuide/opengl—contexts/opengl—contexts.html, 2010, 9 pages. |
Corbet, et al., “Linux Device Drivers”, Third Edition, Chaper 8—Allocating Memory, Feb. 2005, 23 pages. |
Gui “Tabbed browsing. Why close the application on closing the last tab?”, Retrieved from <http://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/10598/tabbed-browsing-why-close-the-application-on-closing-the-last-tab> on Jun. 11, 2014, Aug. 28, 2011, 3 pages. |
Moreland, et al., “Sort-Last Parallel Rendering for Viewing Extremely Large Data Sets on Tile Displays”, In Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 symposium on parallel and large-data visualization and graphics., 2001, pp. 85-93. |
Shade, “Tiling Layered Depth Images”, SiGGRAPH 2000—http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/ldi/data/TilingLDIs.pdf, 2000, 10 pages. |
“Copying Render Options”, retrieved from <http://download.autodesk.com/global/docs/softimage2013/en—us/userguide/index.html?url=files/renderoptions—managing—CopyingRenderOptions.htm,topicNumber=d28e375988> on Feb. 9, 2012, 3 pages. |
“PCT Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/023354, (May 16, 2013),10 pages. |
“Shading OpenGL Shaders”, retrieved from <http://www.sidefx.com/docs/houdini9.5/shade/opengl> on Feb. 9, 2012, 7 pages. |
“File Explorer”, Retrieved from <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File—Explorer&oldid=425043676> on Apr. 3, 2015, Apr. 20, 2011, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,299, May 13, 2015, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,805, Mar. 24, 2015, 35 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,832, Apr. 3, 2015, 43 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201310211477.X, May 5, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,815, Apr. 23, 2015, 32 pages. |
“Second Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/061010, Jun. 25, 2015, 7 Pages. |
Miles,“theForger's Win32 API Programming Tutorial—A Simple Window”, Retrieved from <https://web.archive.org/web/20100211130846/http://www.winprog.org/tutorial/simple—window.html> on Mar. 24, 2015, 1998, 5 pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/061010”, Mailed Date: Oct. 26, 2015, 8 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140372511 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |