Context aware threat protection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10505964
  • Patent Number
    10,505,964
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 16, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 10, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Methods and systems for dynamic threat protection are disclosed. An example method for dynamic threat protection may commence with receiving real-time contextual data from at least one data source associated with a client. The method may further include analyzing the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client. The method may continue with assigning, based on the analysis, the security threat score to the client. The method may further include automatically applying a security policy to the client. The security policy may be applied based on the security threat score assigned to the client.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to data processing, and more specifically, to dynamic threat protection in a data network.


BACKGROUND

The approaches described in this section could be pursued but are not necessarily approaches that have previously been conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.


Within a modern threat protection system, a policy can be defined using Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to identify nodes to protect or block, or nodes against which a further policy can be executed. In general, the basis for the protection policy is defined statically by a user and then manually applied. The challenge, however, is that because service providing systems are dynamic with the state of services, clients, and servers in constant flux and, therefore, static policies can only be effective for a short period of time. Events within a service providing system can constantly change the state of the service providing system. User authentication, changes in reputation, mobile device roaming, and IP address lease expiration are all examples of events which negate the usefulness of a static policy.


As static policies lose their relevance, threat protection systems attempt to automatically ascertain the correct policy through active challenges and passive observation of flows. However, selecting the correct policy is a resource-intensive process that amounts to marginally effective “guess work” by the threat protection systems.


SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described in the Detailed Description below. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.


The present disclosure is related to approaches for a dynamic threat protection. Specifically, a method for a dynamic threat protection may commence with receiving real-time contextual data from at least one data source associated with a client. The method may further include analyzing the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client. The method may continue with assigning, based on the analysis, the security threat score to the client. The method may further include automatically applying a security policy to the client.


According to another approach of the present disclosure, there is provided a dynamic threat protection system. The system may include at least one data source, an analyzing module, an assignment module, and a mitigation device. The data source may be operable to provide real-time contextual data associated with a client. The analyzing module may be operable to analyze the real-time contextual data. Based on the analysis, a security threat score associated with the client can be determined. The assignment module may be operable to assign, based on the analysis, the security threat score to the client. Upon assigning the security threat score to the client, the mitigation device may automatically apply, based on the security threat score, a security policy to the client.


In further example embodiments of the present disclosure, the method operations are stored on a machine-readable medium comprising instructions, which, when implemented by one or more processors, perform the recited operations. In yet further example embodiments, hardware systems or devices can be adapted to perform the recited operations. Other features, examples, and embodiments are described below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an environment within which methods for dynamic threat protection can be practiced.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a dynamic threat protection system.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating components of a network node.



FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram illustrating a method for dynamic threat protection.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing example real-time contextual data.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating application of a policy to subscribers in a service providing system.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for providing a service in response to a service request.



FIG. 8 shows a diagrammatic representation of a computing device for a machine, within which a set of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein can be executed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show illustrations in accordance with example embodiments. These example embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. The embodiments can be combined, other embodiments can be utilized, or structural, logical, and electrical changes can be made without departing from the scope of what is claimed. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. In this document, the terms “a” and “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or,” such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated.


The techniques of the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented using a variety of technologies. For example, the methods described herein may be implemented in software executing on a computer system or in hardware utilizing either a combination of microprocessors or other specially designed application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices, or various combinations thereof. In particular, the methods described herein may be implemented by a series of computer-executable instructions residing on a storage medium such as a disk drive, or computer-readable medium. It should be noted that methods disclosed herein can be implemented by a computer (e.g., a desktop computer, a tablet computer, a laptop computer, and a server), a game console, a handheld gaming device, a cellular phone, a smart phone, a smart television system, and so forth.


The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for dynamic threat protection. According to an example method, a client can send a service request to a server in a data network. The service request may include one or more data packets. The client may be associated with a data source operable to collect real-time contextual data associated with the client. In particular, the data source may include a hardware node or a software node in the data network and may be in communication with the client. The data source may be operable to provide the real-time contextual data associated with the client to a dynamic threat protection system.


The dynamic threat protection system may be operable to select and apply a security policy with regard to a specific client. To this effect, the dynamic threat protection system may have a real-time understanding of the client-specific contextual data received from the data sources. The dynamic threat protection system may receive the service request from the client. Upon receiving the service request, the dynamic threat protection system may retrieve the real-time contextual data of the client from the data source associated with the client. Alternatively, the real-time contextual data may be retrieved from the service request received from the client. The real-time contextual data may include authenticated user data, IP address renewal, wireless roaming information, network path, updated payment information, age of an account, and the like.


Based on the real-time contextual data, the dynamic threat protection system may assign a security threat score to the client. The assigned security threat score may be used by the dynamic threat protection system to select and apply a specific security policy to the client. More specifically, by receiving the real-time contextual data, the dynamic threat protection system may update “on the fly” the security policy with respect to a specific client. Additionally, a common event bus may be created to group many disparate data sources associated with the clients to allow the dynamic threat protection system to apply the most relevant update to any particular security policy.


Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows an environment 100 within which methods for dynamic threat protection can be practiced. The environment 100 may include a network 110, a client 120, a client device 130 associated with the client 120, a data source 140, a server 150, a dynamic threat protection system 200, and a third-party contextual data providing system 160. The data source 140 may be associated with the client 120 and may include a network resource, such as a network node, that collects real-time contextual data 180 associated with the client 120. The client 120 may perform a data service session with the server 150 by sending a service request including data packets 170 from the client device 130 to the server 150. The dynamic threat protection system 200 may receive the real-time contextual data 180 from the data source 140. Based on analysis of the received real-time contextual data 180, the dynamic threat protection system 200 may select a security policy 190 to be assigned to the client 120. The server 150 may process the data packets 170 of the client 120 based on the security policy 190. Alternatively, the dynamic threat protection system 200 may receive the real-time contextual data 180 associated with the client 120 from the third-party contextual data providing system 160.


The network 110 may include the Internet or any other network capable of communicating data between devices. Suitable networks may include or interface with any one or more of, for instance, a local intranet, a PAN (Personal Area Network), a LAN (Local Area Network), a WAN (Wide Area Network), a MAN (Metropolitan Area Network), a virtual private network (VPN), a storage area network (SAN), a frame relay connection, an Advanced Intelligent Network (AIN) connection, a synchronous optical network (SONET) connection, a digital T1, T3, E1 or E3 line, Digital Data Service (DDS) connection, DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) connection, an Ethernet connection, an ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) line, a dial-up port such as a V.90, V.34 or V.34bis analog modem connection, a cable modem, an ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) connection, or an FDDI (Fiber Distributed Data Interface) or CDDI (Copper Distributed Data Interface) connection. Furthermore, communications may also include links to any of a variety of wireless networks, including WAP (Wireless Application Protocol), GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) or TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), cellular phone networks, GPS (Global Positioning System), CDPD (cellular digital packet data), RIM (Research in Motion, Limited) duplex paging network, Bluetooth radio, or an IEEE 802.11-based radio frequency network. The network 110 can further include or interface with any one or more of an RS-232 serial connection, an IEEE-1394 (FireWire) connection, a Fiber Channel connection, an IrDA (infrared) port, a SCSI (Small Computer Systems Interface) connection, a USB (Universal Serial Bus) connection or other wired or wireless, digital or analog interface or connection, mesh or Digi® networking. The network 110 may include a network of data processing nodes that are interconnected for the purpose of data communication.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram representing components of a dynamic threat protection system 200, in accordance with certain embodiments. The system 200 may include at least one data source 210. The data source 210 may be operable to provide real-time contextual data associated with a client. In an example embodiment, the real-time contextual data may be received from the at least one data source via a common event bus. In a further example embodiment, the real-time contextual data may include at least one of the following: authentication data, IP data, wireless roaming data, network path data, payment data, account data, operating system data, virus scan data, session data, client data, client location data, session encryption data, client network data, and client reputation data. In further example embodiments, the real-time contextual data may be received from a third-party system. The real-time contextual data may be obtained from at least one data protocol of data communications with the client.


The system 200 may further include an analyzing module 220. The analyzing module 220 may be operable to analyze the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client. The system 200 may further include an assignment module 230. The assignment module may be operable to assign, based on the analysis performed by the analyzing module 220, the security threat score to the client.


The system 200 may further include a mitigation device 240. The mitigation device 240 may be operable to receive a service request from the client. The service request may include one or more data packets. The mitigation device 240 may be operable to automatically apply, based on the security threat score, a security policy to the client. Furthermore, based on the security threat score, a quality of service is provided to the client. In an example embodiment, the mitigation device 240 may be operable to determine whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score. Based on the determination, the mitigation device 240 may be operable to selectively apply additional security measures to the client. The additional security measures may include analyzing contents of data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a network node 300 of the data network. The network node can be a client device, a server, a data source, or other computing devices in the data network. In one embodiment, the network node 300 includes a processor module 310, a network module 320, and a computer storage module 330. In one embodiment, the processor module 310 includes one or more processors, which may be a micro-processor, an Intel processor, an AMD processor, a MIPS processor, an ARM-based processor, or a RISC processor. The processor module 310 may include one or more processor cores embedded in a processor. In an example embodiment, the processor module 310 includes one or more embedded processors, or embedded processing elements in a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), or Digital Signal Processor (DSP).


The network module 320 may include a network interface, such as Ethernet, an optical network interface, a wireless network interface, T1/T3 interface, a WAN or LAN interface. In one embodiment, the network module 320 includes a network processor. In one embodiment, the computer storage module 330 includes RAM, DRAM, SRAM, SDRAM or memory utilized by the processor module 310 or the network module 320.


In one embodiment, the computer storage module 330 stores data utilized by processor module 310. In one embodiment, the computer storage module 330 includes a hard disk drive, a solid state drive, an external disk, a DVD, a CD, or a readable external disk. The computer storage module 330 may store one or more computer programming instructions which when executed by the processor module 310 or the network module 320 implement one or more of the functionalities of the present disclosure.


In one embodiment, the network node 300 further includes an input/output (I/O) module 340, which may include a keyboard, a keypad, a mouse, a gesture based input sensor, a microphone, a physical or sensory input peripheral, a display, a speaker, or a physical or sensual output peripheral.



FIG. 4 illustrates a method 400 for a dynamic threat protection, according to an example embodiment. In some embodiments, the operations may be combined, performed in parallel, or performed in a different order. The method 400 may also include additional or fewer operations than those illustrated. The method 400 may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., decision making logic, dedicated logic, programmable logic, and microcode), software (such as software run on a general-purpose computer system or a dedicated machine), or a combination of both.


The method 400 may commence with receiving, by at least one processor, real-time contextual data from at least one data source associated with a client at operation 402. The real-time contextual data may be received from the at least one data source via a common event bus. In an example embodiment, the real-time contextual data is received from a third-party system. In a further example embodiment, the real-time contextual data is obtained from at least one data protocol of data communications with the client. Optionally, the real-time contextual data may be received along with receiving a service request from the client. The service request may include one or more data packets.



FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating real-time contextual data 500. The real-time contextual data 500 may include at least one of the following: authentication data, IP data, wireless roaming data, network path data, payment data, account data, operating system data, virus scan data, session data, client data, client location data, session encryption data, client network data, client reputation data, and so forth.


Referring back to FIG. 4, upon receiving the real-time contextual data, the method 400 may continue with analyzing the real-time contextual data at operation 404. The analysis is performed to determine a security threat score associated with the client. Based on the analysis, the security threat score may be assigned to the client at operation 406. At operation 408, the method 400 may include automatically applying, based on the security threat score, a security policy to the client. Upon applying the security policy to the client, the method 400 may further include providing a quality of service to the client based on the security threat score.


In an example embodiment, the method 400 may further include determining whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score. Based on the determination, additional security measures may be selectively applied to the client. The additional security measures may include analyzing contents of the data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram 600 illustrating applying policy to subscribers in a service providing system. The service providing system (not shown), such as, for example, a game providing system, may have a number of subscribers, shown as subscriber 605 and subscriber 610. The subscriber 605 and subscriber 610 may be requested to provide subscriber-specific information, such as subscriber payment data 615. The service providing system may collect and store the subscriber-specific information in a subscriber list 620. The subscriber list 620 may contain data related to authenticated subscribers, i.e. subscribers registered in the service providing system, and subscriber-specific information. The subscriber-specific information may further include operating system data, patch level data, the latest virus scan data, up time data, and so forth. In case the subscriber 610 does not enter the subscriber payment data, an indication 625 that no payment data is available for the subscriber 610 may be stored in the subscriber list 620.


The dynamic threat protection system 200 may be provided with the subscriber list 620 containing an updated list of authenticated subscribers 605, 610 with updated subscriber-specific information. Based on the provided subscriber-specific information, such as subscriber payment data 615 or indication 625 that no payment data is available for the subscriber 610, the dynamic threat protection system 200 may provide the subscriber 605 with preferential quality of service over the subscriber 610. For example, the subscriber 605 with valid payment data may be provided with a full access policy 630, while the subscriber 610 with no payment data may be provided with a restricted access policy 635. Therefore, using the subscriber-specific information, the dynamic threat protection system 200 may apply the security policy of extreme relevance to a specific subscriber.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram 700 illustrating providing a service in response to a service request, according to an example embodiment. The dynamic threat protection system may receive a service request from a client at block 710. At block 720, the dynamic threat protection system may retrieve real-time contextual data associated with the client from the service request or from a data source associated with the client. The real-time contextual data is illustrated in detail with respect to FIG. 5. Upon retrieval of the real-time contextual data, the dynamic threat protection system may determine whether the client is trusted at block 730. The determination may be performed based on the analysis of the real-time contextual data to determine the security threat score of the client. In case the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score, the client may be determined to be trusted. At block 740, a first type of service, e.g. unlimited service, may be provided to the trusted client. In case the security threat score assigned to the client is below a predetermined threshold threat score, the client may be determined to be untrusted. At block 750, a second type of service, e.g. limited service, may be provided to the untrusted client.



FIG. 8 illustrates an example computer system 800 that may be used to implement embodiments of the present disclosure. The system 800 of FIG. 8 can be implemented in the contexts of the likes of computing systems, networks, servers, or combinations thereof. The computing system 800 of FIG. 8 includes one or more processor units 810 and main memory 820. Main memory 820 stores, in part, instructions and data for execution by processor 810. Main memory 820 stores the executable code when in operation. The computer system 800 of FIG. 8 further includes a mass data storage 830, portable storage medium drive(s) 840, output devices 850, user input devices 860, a graphics display system 870, and peripheral devices 880. The methods may be implemented in software that is cloud-based.


The components shown in FIG. 8 are depicted as being connected via a single bus 890. The components may be connected through one or more data transport means. Processor unit 810 and main memory 820 is connected via a local microprocessor bus, and the mass data storage 830, peripheral device(s) 880, portable storage device 840, and graphics display system 870 are connected via one or more input/output (I/O) buses.


Mass data storage 830, which can be implemented with a magnetic disk drive, solid state drive, or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 810. Mass data storage 830 stores the system software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure for purposes of loading that software into main memory 820.


Portable storage device 840 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disc, digital video disc, or Universal Serial Bus (USB) storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 800 of FIG. 8. The system software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure is stored on such a portable medium and input to the computer system 800 via the portable storage device 840.


User input devices 860 provide a portion of a user interface. User input devices 860 include one or more microphones, an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. User input devices 860 can also include a touchscreen. Additionally, the computer system 800 as shown in FIG. 8 includes output devices 850. Suitable output devices include speakers, printers, network interfaces, and monitors.


Graphics display system 870 includes a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display system 870 receives textual and graphical information and processes the information for output to the display device.


Peripheral devices 880 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system.


The components provided in the computer system 800 of FIG. 8 are those typically found in computer systems that may be suitable for use with embodiments of the present disclosure and are intended to represent a broad category of such computer components that are well known in the art. Thus, the computer system 800 of FIG. 8 can be a personal computer (PC), hand held computing system, telephone, mobile computing system, workstation, tablet, phablet, mobile phone, server, minicomputer, mainframe computer, or any other computing system. The computer may also include different bus configurations, networked platforms, multi-processor platforms, and the like. Various operating systems may be used, including UNIX, LINUX, WINDOWS, MAC OS, PALM OS, ANDROID, IOS, QNX, and other suitable operating systems.


It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the embodiments provided herein. Computer-readable storage media refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a central processing unit (CPU), a processor, a microcontroller, or the like. Such media may take forms including, but not limited to, non-volatile and volatile media, such as optical or magnetic disks and dynamic memory, respectively. Common forms of computer-readable storage media include a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic storage medium, a Compact Disc Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) disk, digital video disc (DVD), Blu-ray Disc (BD), any other optical storage medium, Random-Access Memory (RAM), Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electronically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory, and/or any other memory chip, module, or cartridge.


In some embodiments, the computer system 800 may be implemented as a cloud-based computing environment, such as a virtual machine operating within a computing cloud. In other embodiments, the computer system 800 may itself include a cloud-based computing environment, where the functionalities of the computer system 800 are executed in a distributed fashion. Thus, the computer system 800, when configured as a computing cloud, may include pluralities of computing devices in various forms, as will be described in greater detail below.


In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large grouping of processors (such as within web servers) and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large grouping of computer memories or storage devices. Systems that provide cloud-based resources may be utilized exclusively by their owners, or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.


The cloud may be formed, for example, by a network of web servers that comprise a plurality of computing devices, such as the computer system 800, with each server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers may manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource customers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depends on the type of business associated with the user.


Thus, methods and systems for dynamic threat protection are disclosed. While the present embodiments have been described in connection with a series of embodiments, these descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the subject matter to the particular forms set forth herein. It will be further understood that the methods are not necessarily limited to the discrete components described. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the subject matter as disclosed herein and defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A dynamic threat protection system comprising: at least one processor; anda memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor, the memory storing instructions executable by the at least one processor, the at least one processor being configured to:receive, from a client, a service request for a data service session with a server;in response to the receiving of the service request from the client, retrieve real-time contextual data associated with the client from a plurality of data sources associated with the client, at least one data source of the plurality of data sources including a network node separate from the client;analyze the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client, the analyzing including determining a presence of payment data associated with the client in the real-time contextual data, the payment data including at least a payment account information entered by the client;assign, based on the analysis, the security threat score to the client; anddynamically select and apply, based on the security threat score, a security policy to the client, the applying including:providing a full access service with an increased quality of service to the client when the payment account information is stored in the real-time contextual data;providing a restricted access service with a decreased quality of service to the client when payment account information is absent in the real-time contextual data;determine whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score; andbased on the determination, selectively applying further security measures to the client, the further security measures including analyzing contents of data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further operable to provide, based on the security threat score, a quality of service to the client.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the real-time contextual data is received from the at least one data source via a common event bus.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the real-time contextual data includes at least one of the following: authentication data, Internet Protocol (IP) data, wireless roaming data, network path data, payment data, account data, operating system data, virus scan data, session data, client data, client location data, session encryption data, client network data, and client reputation data.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the real-time contextual data is received from a third-party system.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the real-time contextual data is obtained from at least one data protocol of data communications with the client.
  • 7. A method for a dynamic threat protection, the method comprising: receiving, by at least one processor, from a client, a service request for a data service session with a server;in response to the receiving of the service request from the client, retrieving, by the at least one processor, real-time contextual data associated with the client from a plurality of data sources associated with the client, at least one data source of the plurality of data sources including a network node separate from the client;analyzing, by the at least one processor, the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client, the analyzing including determining a presence of payment data associated with the client in the real-time contextual data, the payment data including at least a payment account information entered by the client;based on the analyzing, assigning, by the at least one processor, the security threat score to the client; andbased on the security threat score, dynamically selecting and applying, by the at least one processor, a security policy to the client, the applying including:providing a full access service with an increased quality of service to the client when the payment account information is stored in the real-time contextual data;providing a restricted access service with a decreased quality of service to the client when the payment account information is absent in the real-time contextual data;determine whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score; andbased on the determination, selectively applying further security measures to the client, the further security measures including analyzing contents of data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising providing a quality of service to the client based on the security threat score.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, further comprising: determining, by the at least one processor, whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score; andbased on the determination, selectively applying, by the at least one processor, further security measures to the client.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the further security measures include analyzing, by the at least one processor, contents of data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the real-time contextual data is received from the at least one data source via a common event bus.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the real-time contextual data includes at least one of the following: authentication data, Internet Protocol (IP) data, wireless roaming data, network path data, payment data, account data, operating system data, virus scan data, session data, client data, client location data, session encryption data, client network data, and client reputation data.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the real-time contextual data is received from a third-party system.
  • 14. The method of claim 7, wherein the real-time contextual data is obtained from at least one data protocol of data communications with the client.
  • 15. The method of claim 7, wherein the service request includes one or more data packets.
  • 16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having embodied thereon a program executable by at least one processor to perform a method for a dynamic threat protection, the method comprising: receiving, from a client, a service request for a data service session with a server;in response to the receiving of the service request from the client, retrieving real-time contextual data associated with the client from a plurality of data sources associated with the client, at least one data source of the plurality of data sources including a network node separate from the client;analyzing the real-time contextual data to determine a security threat score associated with the client, the analyzing including determining a presence of payment data associated with the client in the real-time contextual data, the payment data including at least a payment account information entered by the client;based on the analysis, assigning the security threat score to the client; andbased on the security threat score, dynamically selecting and applying a security policy to the client, the applying including:providing a full access service with an increased quality of service to the client when the payment account information is stored in the real-time contextual data;providing a restricted access service with a decreased quality of service to the client when the payment account information is absent in the real-time contextual data;determine whether the security threat score assigned to the client is above a predetermined threshold threat score; andbased on the determination, selectively applying further security measures to the client, the further security measures including analyzing contents of data packets associated with the client for adherence to a predetermined standard.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of, and claims the priority benefit of, U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/480,212, filed on Apr. 5, 2017, entitled “Context Aware Threat Protection”, which is a continuation of, and claims the priority benefit of, U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 14/584,987, filed Dec. 29, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,621,575 issued on Apr. 11, 2017 and titled “Context Aware Threat Protection”. The disclosures of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety, including all references cited therein.

US Referenced Citations (255)
Number Name Date Kind
4001819 Wise Jan 1977 A
4780905 Cruts et al. Oct 1988 A
5101402 Chiu et al. Mar 1992 A
5163088 LoCascio Nov 1992 A
5359659 Rosenthal Oct 1994 A
5414833 Hershey et al. May 1995 A
5584023 Hsu Dec 1996 A
5684875 Ellenberger Nov 1997 A
5757908 Cooper et al. May 1998 A
5940002 Finn et al. Aug 1999 A
5960177 Tanno Sep 1999 A
5963625 Kawecki Oct 1999 A
6088804 Hill et al. Jul 2000 A
6108583 Schneck et al. Aug 2000 A
6119236 Shipley Sep 2000 A
6185681 Zizzi Feb 2001 B1
6205115 Ikebe et al. Mar 2001 B1
6237036 Ueno et al. May 2001 B1
6249866 Brundrett et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259789 Paone Jul 2001 B1
6304975 Shipley Oct 2001 B1
6324286 Lai et al. Nov 2001 B1
6347376 Attwood et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363486 Knapton, III Mar 2002 B1
6449651 Dorfman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6505192 Godwin et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519703 Joyce Feb 2003 B1
6594780 Shen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6715081 Attwood et al. Mar 2004 B1
6732279 Hoffman May 2004 B2
6735702 Yavatkar et al. May 2004 B1
6754832 Godwin et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757822 Feiertag et al. Jun 2004 B1
6779117 Wells Aug 2004 B1
6988106 Enderwick et al. Jan 2006 B2
7013296 Yemini Mar 2006 B1
7092357 Ye Aug 2006 B1
7159237 Schneier et al. Jan 2007 B2
7194766 Noehring et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200760 Riebe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7221757 Alao May 2007 B2
7222366 Bruton, III et al. May 2007 B2
7296283 Hrastar et al. Nov 2007 B2
7372809 Chen et al. May 2008 B2
7392241 Lin et al. Jun 2008 B2
7409712 Brooks et al. Aug 2008 B1
7418733 Connary et al. Aug 2008 B2
7543052 Cesa Klein Jun 2009 B1
7565549 Satterlee et al. Jul 2009 B2
7577833 Lai Aug 2009 B2
7596695 Liao et al. Sep 2009 B2
7620733 Tzakikario et al. Nov 2009 B1
7640591 Tripathi et al. Dec 2009 B1
7653633 Villella et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665138 Song et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676566 Lund Mar 2010 B2
7739494 McCorkendale et al. Jun 2010 B1
7739736 Tripathi et al. Jun 2010 B1
7809131 Njemanze et al. Oct 2010 B1
7870203 Judge Jan 2011 B2
7895649 Brook et al. Feb 2011 B1
7925766 Jayawardena et al. Apr 2011 B2
7953855 Jayawardena et al. May 2011 B2
8037532 Haswell Oct 2011 B2
8089871 Iloglu et al. Jan 2012 B2
8220056 Owens, Jr. Jul 2012 B2
8239670 Kaufman et al. Aug 2012 B1
8276203 Nakhre et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286227 Zheng Oct 2012 B1
8289981 Wei et al. Oct 2012 B1
8301802 Wei et al. Oct 2012 B2
8448245 Banerjee et al. May 2013 B2
8478708 Larcom Jul 2013 B1
8484066 Miller Jul 2013 B2
8566932 Hotta Oct 2013 B1
8595845 Basavapatna et al. Nov 2013 B2
8683598 Cashin Mar 2014 B1
8706762 Patzer Apr 2014 B1
8719446 Spatscheck et al. May 2014 B2
8756691 Nachenberg Jun 2014 B2
8800034 McHugh et al. Aug 2014 B2
8813228 Magee et al. Aug 2014 B2
8832832 Visbal Sep 2014 B1
8881284 Gabriel Nov 2014 B1
8904520 Nachenberg Dec 2014 B1
8948380 Goto Feb 2015 B2
9129116 Wiltzius Sep 2015 B1
9165064 Brown Oct 2015 B2
9215208 Fraize et al. Dec 2015 B2
9245121 Luo et al. Jan 2016 B1
9294503 Thompson et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300623 Earl et al. Mar 2016 B1
9418213 Roth Aug 2016 B1
9491155 Johansson Nov 2016 B1
9621575 Jalan et al. Apr 2017 B1
9722918 Oshiba Aug 2017 B2
9832532 Agabob Nov 2017 B1
9838425 Jalan et al. Dec 2017 B2
9843599 Jalan et al. Dec 2017 B2
9860271 Thompson et al. Jan 2018 B2
20010042204 Blaker et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020087708 Low et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020108059 Canion et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165912 Wenocur et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188839 Noehring et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030016636 Tari et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018908 Mercer et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023726 Rice Jan 2003 A1
20030023846 Krishna et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028585 Yeager et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046332 Riegel Mar 2003 A1
20030061507 Xiong et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069973 Ganesan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030123667 Weber et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149880 Shamsaasef Aug 2003 A1
20030187688 Fey et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196081 Savarda et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200456 Cyr et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204752 Garrison Oct 2003 A1
20040006508 Gullo Jan 2004 A1
20040008711 Lahti et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040038690 Lee Feb 2004 A1
20040044912 Connary Mar 2004 A1
20040054807 Harvey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040057579 Fahrny Mar 2004 A1
20040059943 Marquet et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059951 Pinkas et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059952 Newport et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040091114 Carter et al. May 2004 A1
20040093524 Sakai May 2004 A1
20040111635 Boivie et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040143751 Peikari Jul 2004 A1
20040148520 Talpade et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040158817 Okachi Aug 2004 A1
20040172538 Satoh et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040242200 Maeoka et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021999 Touitou et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050036501 Chung et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050041584 Lau et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044068 Lin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044270 Grove et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044352 Pazi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050108434 Witchey May 2005 A1
20050125684 Schmidt Jun 2005 A1
20050193199 Asokan et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198099 Motsinger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210243 Archard et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235145 Slick et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050257093 Johnson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278527 Liao et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015354 Shrum et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056297 Bryson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060061507 Mohamadi Mar 2006 A1
20060129627 Phillips Jun 2006 A1
20060143707 Song et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060185014 Spatscheck et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206936 Liang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230444 Iloglu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060251057 Kwon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253902 Rabadan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256716 Caci Nov 2006 A1
20060265585 Lai Nov 2006 A1
20060282660 Varghese Dec 2006 A1
20060288076 Cowings Dec 2006 A1
20060288411 Garg et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070056038 Lok Mar 2007 A1
20070079379 Sprosts et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070143769 Bu et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070166691 Epstein Jul 2007 A1
20070169194 Church et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186282 Jenkins Aug 2007 A1
20070214088 Graham et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070280114 Chao et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291773 Khan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080065645 Eichhorn Mar 2008 A1
20080104180 Gabe May 2008 A1
20080183885 Durrey et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080229418 Chen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080256623 Worley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080301794 Lee Dec 2008 A1
20090049198 Blinn et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070470 Bauman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077663 Sun et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083537 Larsen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090150996 Haswell Jun 2009 A1
20090168995 Banga et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090227228 Hu et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241190 Todd et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287941 Shouno Nov 2009 A1
20100048167 Chow Feb 2010 A1
20100070405 Joa et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100106833 Banerjee et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100138921 Na et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100284300 Deshpande et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286998 Picken Nov 2010 A1
20110029599 Pulleyn et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110082947 Szeto et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093785 Lee et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110131646 Park et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153744 Brown Jun 2011 A1
20110188452 Borleske et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213751 Iorio Sep 2011 A1
20110249572 Singhal et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110282997 Prince et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120036272 El Zur Feb 2012 A1
20120042006 Kiley Feb 2012 A1
20120042060 Jackowski et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120096546 Dilley et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120110472 Amrhein et al. May 2012 A1
20120144461 Rathbun Jun 2012 A1
20120151554 Tie et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120155274 Wang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159623 Choi Jun 2012 A1
20120163186 Wei et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173684 Courtney et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120174196 Bhogavilli et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120222092 Rabii Aug 2012 A1
20120226582 Hammad Sep 2012 A1
20120227109 Dimuro Sep 2012 A1
20120233656 Rieschick Sep 2012 A1
20120257499 Chatterjee et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120266242 Yang et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130019025 Chaturvedi et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130124713 Feinberg et al. May 2013 A1
20130139245 Thomas May 2013 A1
20130167230 Etchegoyen Jun 2013 A1
20130173795 McPherson Jul 2013 A1
20130198385 Han et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130198845 Anvari Aug 2013 A1
20130212265 Rubio Vidales et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212693 Etchegoyen Aug 2013 A1
20130243194 Hawkes et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130263256 Dickinson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140006508 Goyet et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025568 Smith et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140114965 Balduzzi Apr 2014 A1
20140114985 Mok Apr 2014 A1
20140137190 Carey et al. May 2014 A1
20140258536 Chiong Sep 2014 A1
20140279703 Irisarri Sep 2014 A1
20140280832 Oshiba Sep 2014 A1
20140283065 Teddy et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140298091 Carlen et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140310396 Christoborescu et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140344925 Muthiah Nov 2014 A1
20150033341 Schmidtler et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150088597 Doherty Mar 2015 A1
20150143118 Sheller et al. May 2015 A1
20150180892 Balderas Jun 2015 A1
20150193781 Dave Jul 2015 A1
20150312268 Ray Oct 2015 A1
20150333988 Jalan et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160036651 Sureshchandra et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160378978 Singla Dec 2016 A1
20170214711 Arnell Jul 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
1422468 Jun 2003 CN
104106241 Oct 2014 CN
1198848 Jun 2015 HK
375721 Dec 1999 TW
477140 Feb 2002 TW
574655 Feb 2004 TW
576066 Feb 2004 TW
I225999 Jan 2005 TW
I241818 Oct 2005 TW
I252976 Apr 2006 TW
WO1998042108 Sep 1998 WO
WO2006039529 Apr 2006 WO
WO2013112492 Aug 2013 WO
WO2014150617 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014151072 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014176461 Oct 2014 WO
WO2015030977 Mar 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Annexstein, et al., “Indexing Techniques for File Sharing in Scalable Peer-to-Peer Networks,” IEEE, 2002, pp. 10-15.
Dainotti, et al., “Early Classification of Network Traffic through Multi-Classification,” International Workshop on Traffic Monitoring and Analysis, 2011, pp. 122-135.
Dainotti, et al., “TIE: A Community-Oriented Traffic Classification Platform,” International Workshop on Traffic Monitoring and Analysis, 2009, pp. 64-74.
F5 Networks Inc., “SOL11243: iRules Containing the RULE_INIT iRule Event do not Re-Initialize when a Syntax Error Is Corrected,” F5.support.com, 2010, pp. 1.
Ganesan, et al., “YAPPERS: A Peer-to-Peer Lookup Service over Arbitrary Topology,” IEEE, Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1250-1260.
How to Create a Rule in Outlook 2003, CreateaRule-Outlook2003.doc 031405 mad, pp. 3.
Lee, et al., “On the Detection of Signaling DoS Attacks on 3G Wireless Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, 2007, pp. 1289-1297.
Liebergeld, et al., “Cellpot: A Concept for Next Generation Cellular Network Honeypots,” Internet Society, 2014, pp. 1-6.
Ling, et al., “A Content-Based Resource Location Mechanism in PeerIS,” IEEE, 2002, pp. 279-288.
Long, et al., “ID-Based Threshold Decryption Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Ciphertext Attack,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2007, vol. 33, pp. 166-176.
Mutz, “Linux Encryption HOWTO,” http://encryptionhowto.sourceforge.net/Encryption-HOWTO.html, 2000, pp. 49.
Obimbo, et al., “A Parallel Algorithm for Determining the Inverse of a Matrix for Use in Blockcipher Encryption/Decryption,” J. Supercomput, 2007, vol. 39, pp. 113-130.
Oracle Corporation, “Oracle Intelligent Agents User's Guide,” Release 9.2.0, Part No. A96676-01, 2002, pp. 36.
Popek, et al., “Encryption and Secure Computer Networks,” Computer Surveys, 1979, vol. 11 (4), pp. 331-356.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180083997 A1 Mar 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15480212 Apr 2017 US
Child 15815455 US
Parent 14584987 Dec 2014 US
Child 15480212 US