In a packet switched data network it is very common practice to limit or regulate the flow of traffic using a data packet mediation device, such as a firewall, or a quality of service (“QoS”) router, such as a traffic shaping router. These data mediation devices use a mechanism for specifying rules to limit or regulate the flow of data packets through the data mediation device. For example, the data mediation device can utilize packet filters that describe the characteristics of data packets, a priority to be placed on any packets that matches the filter and an action, or actions, to be performed on any packet that matches the filter. For purposes of packet filtering, a packet can be described, or identified, using criteria such as source Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, destination IP address, direction (incoming and outgoing interfaces), protocol type (UDP, TCP, ESP, ICMP, etc.), and port number (for UDP and TCP based protocols).
Using the above criteria, a rule that specifies the following criteria: source=192.168.1.1, destination=0.0.0.0, direction=incoming, protocol=tcp, port=80 could be used to match all data packets coming into the data mediation device from a web browser (e.g., destination=0.0.0.0, direction=incoming, protocol=tcp, port=80) on machine corresponding to a source IP address of 192.168.1.1.
In a typical data filtering implementation, once the packets are recognized by the data mediation device using the filter, the data mediation device can implement a variety of actions for data packets matching the filtering rules. In one aspect, the data mediation device can change the priority of the packet. For example, the data mediation device can raise the priority of data packets to reduce delay (i.e., jitter in voice packet streams). Alternatively, the data mediation device can also lower the priority for time insensitive data, such as http (web browser) traffic. In another aspect, the data mediation device can perform other actions on the data packets including allowing the data packet to continue through the data mediation device, deny the data packet access to pass through the data mediation device, reject the data packet, drop the data packet, log the existence of the data packet, and the like.
Returning to the web browser example, in the event a data processing rule is specified that results in an action of denial of a data packet, the data mediation device typically returns a message indicating that the requested service is unavailable, thus denying service to the client. All other clients not corresponding to the destination IP address would not be subject to that particular filtering rule and may be able to reach the web server normally and receive service. The specific example described would be considered a static firewall; the rules never change unless they are changed manually.
In another embodiment, more sophisticated data mediation devices can introduce a reactive element to the rule sets. For example, the filter language can be extended to incorporate the concept of time, either absolute or relative, including start time, end time, and a maximum number of events in a specified period of time. The inclusion of reactive elements allows data mediation devices to have temporal limitations to the filtering rules. With reference again to the web browser example, a filtering rule may be configured such that the data mediation device will allow the web service to be available between the hours of 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. to client 192.168.1.1, but at all other times deny the service. A filter that utilized relative time might modify the web browser example to only allow 10 web browser sessions per hour, if the number of sessions exceeds 10 in the previous hour, then deny the session. These techniques are common in parental control products such as “Net Nanny” that limit the access and time a child spends on the Internet.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present disclosure consists of one or more mobile communication devices capable of participating in data communications via a communication network. The mobile communication devices further determine, or otherwise collect, context information associated with a current context of the mobile communication device. Based on the context information and mobile communication identification information, a communication management system can process data communications between the mobile communication device and one or more computing devices. With reference to a specific embodiment, illustratively, the communication management system can filter data communications to or from the mobile communication device based on a mobile communication device context associated with motion, or other context in which data communication should be limited, or prevented altogether. Although aspects of the system will be described to the drawings, flow diagrams, screen interfaces, and specific examples, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, the disclosed embodiments should not be construed as limiting.
With reference now to
To manage requested communications, the communication management system 102 communicates with corresponding subsystems responsible for establishing wireless communication channels, such as mobile switching center 108. The communication management system 102 can communicate with the mobile switching center 108 via a direct communication connection, a secure communication channel via a communication network, such as communication network 114, or via a public communication network.
In an illustrative embodiment, the communication management system 102 provides data communication mitigation options in the event that the mobile communication device is unavailable to send or receive data communications. Still further, the communication management system 102 facilitates the generation of various graphical user interfaces for provisioning and/or managing mobile communication device profiles via computing devices 116. Illustrative components of the mobile communication management system 102 will be described in greater detail with regard to
With continued reference to
With continuing reference to
As illustrated in
The mobile switch center 108 can also include interfaces for establishing communication channels with various communication network-based communication devices 112, such as a VoIP communication device. Still further, the mobile switch center 108 can include interfaces for establishing communication channels with a mobile-based communication device 112, such as another mobile communication device. For example, the communication devices 112 can correspond to a third-party mobile communication that establishes an audio communication channel with a mobile communication device 104. Accordingly, although communication network 116 is illustrated as a single communication network, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the communication network can be made up of any number of public or private communication networks and/or network connections.
The various communication devices 112 can include the hardware and software components that facilitate the various modes of operation and communication, such as via wired and wireless communication networks. Additionally, the computing devices 118 can include various hardware and software components, such as a browser software application, that facilitate the generation of the graphical user interfaces for provisioning and managing mobile communication device profiles as will be described below.
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components and configurations provided in
With reference now to
As illustrated in
The communication management system 102 can also include a mobile communication device context processing component 204 for determining the availability of a mobile communication device 104 for communication based on processing mobile communication device context information according to a mobile communication device profile. The mobile communication device context processing component 204 can execute various processes or algorithms for processing transmitted mobile communication device context information to determine mobile communication device availability to transmit or receive data. Additionally, the mobile communication device context processing component 204 can also manage the various context assessment processes or algorithms and updates to existing previously stored context assessment processes and algorithms that are transmitted and executed by the mobile communication devices 104. Still further, the mobile communication device context processing component 204 can further select one or more data filtering policies that have been specified for particular mobile communication device contexts, illustratively, in advance.
With continued reference to
The communication management system 102 can further include a data processing component 208 for processing incoming and outgoing data according to the data filtering rules. In one embodiment, the data processing component 208 can inspect data packets and process the data packets according to the data filtering rules.
With continued reference to
The communication management system 102 can further include a mobile communication device profile data store 212 for maintaining mobile communication device profiles. The mobile communication device profile data store 212 may be one or more databases configured to provide the communication processing component 204 required data to determine mobile communication device data filter templates based on mobile communication device context. As will be described in greater detail below, the mobile communication device profile data defines the availability of the mobile communication device 104 to receive or transmit data as a function of a current mobile communication device context.
With reference now to
As illustrated in
As will be described in greater detail below, the communication management system communication component 302 transmits current mobile device context information in accordance with the context assessment algorithms on the mobile device 104. Once a current mobile communication device context is established, the communication management system 302 can limit additional transmission of context information upon detection of a change in mobile communication context information. Additionally, in an alternative embodiment, the communication management system communication component 302 may also transmit, or otherwise publish, mobile communication device context information to additional recipients, such as communication network resources such as Web sites or network services, and/or to other peer destinations.
The mobile communication device 104 can also include a mobile communication device context information component 304 for processing a set of inputs corresponding to a mobile device environment to determine mobile device context information. Illustrative context assessment algorithms or processes for determining mobile device context information will be described in greater detail below. The mobile communication device contexts can identify or describe aspects of the mobile communication device 104, aspects of the mobile communication device environment, and/or aspects of the user associated with the mobile communication device. For example, the mobile communication device context corresponds to a determination of various states of movement/travel, such as in a non-transitory state, an in-transit state (including city/urban travel transit, highway transit, and in-flight transit states), a journey onset state, and a journey termination state. In another example, the mobile communication device context corresponds to a determination of whether a mobile communication device's present location is within a geospatial boundary, also referred to as geofencing, (including within the geospatial boundary, on a border of the geospatial boundary, or outside the geospatial boundary). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the identified mobile device contexts are not exhaustive and that any number of additional mobile device contexts, or variations of the identified mobile communication device contexts, may also be defined for the mobile communication device 104. An illustrative system and methodologies for determining mobile communication device context or processing mobile communication device context information is described in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/040,832, entitled MANAGEMENT OF MOBILE DEVICE COMMUNICATION SESSIONS TO REDUCE USER DISTRACTION, and filed on Feb. 29, 2008, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
With continued reference to
In one embodiment, the set of inputs include information from sensors or information gathering components that are integrated or attached to the mobile computing device 104. In another embodiment, the set of inputs include information from external sensors or information gather components that provide the information via a communication channel, such as a hardwired connection or wireless connection (e.g., Bluetooth). Still further, in another embodiment, the set of inputs include information related to sensors or processed information from another device or article of manufacture associated with the mobile communication device. For example, the set of inputs can include information from a vehicle computer indicating information about the operation/condition of the vehicle and/or environmental information. Additional information from seat sensors may be able to inform that the remote end user is indeed a passenger and not a driver, and further, that seat belts are engaged. Still further, in another embodiment, the set of inputs include information from sensors that can be repurposed, such as through additional processing, to determine mobile communication device context information. For example, image data from a camera sensor or signal data from a transceiver chipset may be utilized as inputs to a context assessment algorithm to determine mobile communication device context. The above provided identification of the specific types of sensors is not exhaustive. Accordingly, additional or alternative sensors may be utilized to provide information for determining mobile communication device context information.
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the set of inputs may be selected to correspond specifically to the particular algorithms utilized to calculate mobile communication device context. In one example, microphonic sensors may used for detecting high noise levels from the embedded device microphone and using this context to permit only high importance work related calls and data session requests that pertain to the current work function. In another example, the sensor information can corresponds to a determination whether a Bluetooth headset or alternative hands free device is active in accordance with a corporate policy and local jurisdiction law.
In still another example, proximity sensor information could be used to determine a context that the user is currently interacting in a specific manner with the mobile end device may enable specific call and data session management decisions to be critically enabled. In a further example, image data from a mobile device camera may be utilized via signal context assessment algorithms to determine the user's environment. In another example, user configurable keys/control sensor data can be utilized to customize mobile device context information, such as using soft keys, to register specific contexts provided by the mobile communication device user (e.g., “watch me,” “help,” etc.).
The mobile communication device 104 can further include a mobile communication device data store 308 for storing input information from the mobile communication device environment interface 306, context information generated by the mobile communication device processing component 304 and/or the various context assessment algorithms or processes used by the mobile communication device processing component to generate the mobile communication device context information.
With reference now to
With reference now to
As illustrated in
Upon receipt of the context information, the mobile device interface component 202 transmits the context and identification information to the mobile communication device context processing component 204 for processing. As previously described, the identification information can include IP address, transport address, and any other information utilized to associate a particular mobile communication device with a data filtering policy. Illustratively, a policy can have a one-to-one match with mobile device identification information. Alternatively, a policy can have a one-to-many match such that a particular policy can apply to multiple mobile communication devices 104. For example, a particular policy may apply to all mobile communication devices 104 provided by an organization (such as a company or service provider) or associated with a family.
With continued reference to
With reference now to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring now to
With reference now to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring now to
With reference now to
Velocity and distance information can be obtained by the mobile communication device through a variety of sensors and/or components designed to generate or calculate such information. Examples include, but are not limited to, GPS devices/components, accelerometers, navigational equipment, and the like. As previously described, the sensors and/or components may be integrated into the mobile communication device 104 or may be separate components (e.g., a car navigation system) that provide the input information via a wired or wireless connection.
In another example, the velocity and distance information may be calculated by the mobile communication device 104 through by the utilization of recognizable or detectable objects. In accordance with this example, the mobile communication device 104 receives signals generated by fixed transmitters, such as cellular communications base stations or WiFi wireless nodes, which generally include some identification information specific to the particular transmitter, such as an SSID for a wireless node. As a mobile communication device 104 travels, signals from specific transmitters are detected when the mobile communication device is within range of the transmitter and no longer detected when the mobile communication device is beyond the range of the transmitter. For known communication ranges of transmitters, such as WiFi wireless nodes, velocity and distance traveled information may be calculated based on monitoring time from the detection of a signal from a transmitter to loss of the signal. Additionally, the detection of the signal from the transmitter would not require registration with the transmitter and could still be practiced with transmitters that restrict access, such as through encrypted transmissions.
If the minimum movement criteria have not been satisfied, it is assumed that the mobile communication device (considering its environment) is still in a non-transit state and the routine 700 returns to block 702. The routine 700 may continue to loop through this portion for any amount of time.
Alternatively, if the minimum movement criteria have been satisfied, it is assumed that the mobile communication device 104 (considering its environment) is in motion, and at block 706, the transit state is changed to a “journey onset state.” Because the transit state has changed, the mobile communication device 104 may transmit updated context information to the communication management component 102 indicative of the change in transit state to a journey onset state. At block 708, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 enters an observation window for collecting the various inputs over a period of time. The observation window can be configured such that the mobile communication device 104 collects a fixed number of sets as defined by an information collection interval over a time period. Each time a set of inputs is collected a counter is decremented and the process continues until the targeted number of sets on inputs have been collected (e.g., the counter is decremented to a value of “0”). Additionally, if the mobile communication device environment interface 306 is currently not receiving inputs, or otherwise not accepting inputs, the mobile communication device 104 may enter a lower power consumption mode in which one or more components of the mobile communication device 104 become inactive or enter in a low power consumption mode of operation. In turn, the mobile communication device 104 then powers up, or wakes up, at the next information collection interval. The specific information collection interval implemented by the mobile communication device context processing component 304 may be dependent on the granularity of the sensor information, the amount of input information that should be collected for a given transit state, and/or the likelihood of a potential change in transit state. For example, a longer collection interval can be set for transit states in which variations in the set of inputs is not expected (e.g. a highway transit state) to further conserve mobile communication device power.
Upon the expiration of the time window, at decision block 710, a test is conducted to determine whether minimum movement criteria have been satisfied based on processing the set on inputs. If the minimum movement criteria have not been satisfied, the mobile communication device 104 is determined to be no longer in motion and the routine 700 returns to block 702 to a “non transit” travel state (described above). Because the transit state has changed, the mobile communication device 104 may transmit updated context information to the communication management component 102 indicative of the change in transit state back to a non transit state.
With reference now to
At decision blocks 716-718, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 processes the collected input data to determine whether the mobile communication device 104 should remain in its current city/urban transit state, whether the mobile communication device has reached a terminus state, or whether the transit state is more indicative of another transit state typically indicative of highway travel. The collected information can include velocity, bearing, and distance traveled information. Additionally, the collected information can include processed velocity, bearing and distance traveled information, referred to as variance information, that indicate variances and/or rates of variance in the velocity, bearing and distance traveled over each of the collection intervals in the observed time window.
At decision block 716, a test is conducted to determine criteria indicative of city/urban transit state have been satisfied. The criteria indicative of city/urban transit state can correspond to consideration of variance thresholds for velocity, distance traveled and bearing that are indicative of patterns of city/urban travel. For example, velocity variances for a city/urban transit state may be indicative of a collection of inputs at a time in which a vehicle is stopped (e.g., at a street light) and another collection when the vehicle is traveling at a higher velocity. The thresholds may be determined by observed driving behavior, set by an administrator or set by a particular user. If the criteria indicative of city/urban transit state have not been satisfied, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 determines that the mobile communication device 104 is not likely in a city/urban driving embodiment and moves to block 726, which will be described in greater detail below. Alternatively, if the criteria indicative of city/urban transit state have been satisfied, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 determines that the mobile communication device 104 should either remain in a city/urban travel state or has reached a terminus. Accordingly, at decision block 718, a test is conducted to determine whether minimum movement criteria have been satisfied based on processing the set on inputs. If the minimum movement criteria have not been satisfied, the mobile communication device 104 is determined to be no longer in motion and the routine 700 proceeds to block 720 (
With reference now to
Upon the completion of the observation window, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 will determine whether the mobile communication device has re-entered a travel state (e.g., after a temporary stop) or has entered a non-transitory state (e.g., at home or at the office). Accordingly, at decision block 724, a test is conducted to determine whether a minimum movement has been detected based on the set on inputs. If minimum movement has not been detected, the mobile communication device 104 is determined to be no longer in motion. Accordingly, the transit state is changed to “non transitory” at block 702 (
With reference now to
At decision block 730, a test is conducted to again determine whether criteria indicative of city/urban transit state has been satisfied. If the city criteria indicative of city/urban transit state has been satisfied, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 determines that the mobile communication device 104 should revert back to a city/urban travel state and the routine 700 returns to block 712 (
If, however, at decision block 732, the minimum movement has been detected based on the set on inputs, at decision block 734, a test is then conducted to determine whether criteria indicative of an in-flight transit state has been satisfied. In an illustrative embodiment, criteria indicative of an in-flight transit state can correspond to consideration of variance thresholds for velocity, distance traveled and bearing that are indicative of patterns of air travel. The criteria may also include consideration of information from altimeters or the like. The thresholds may be determined by observed driving behavior, set by an administrator or set by a particular user. If the criteria indicative of an in-flight transit state has not been satisfied, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 determines that the mobile communication device should remain in a highway transit state and the routine 700 returns to block 726.
With reference now to
With reference now to
With reference to
At block 806, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 obtains mobile communication location information. In an illustrative embodiment, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 can obtain various sensor information indicative of a location or relative location of the mobile communication device. For example, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 can obtain GPS information from an attached GPS component or via wireless communication from another GPS component. In another example, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 can interface with a vehicle's navigation system to obtain location information. In still another example, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 can interface with wireless communication equipment, such as cellular base stations, wireless network nodes (e.g., WiFi and WiMax network nodes), and obtain location information. Additionally, the sensor information can include accelerometers and compass information that facilitates a bearing or direction of the mobile communication device.
In an additional embodiment, and as illustrated in
For purposes of power consumption, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 can monitor various location sensors/inputs. The mobile communication device environment interface 306 can prioritize or rank the location information sources based on various factors, including degree of confidence in the accuracy of the location information, power consumption associated with collecting the location data, financial or service contract issues, and the like. For example, assume that a mobile communication device environment interface 306 has previously stored location information for a known WiFi wireless node in Meta data in the manner described above. Although location information may also be available for an attached GPS component, operation of the GPS component consumes much more device power. Accordingly, the mobile communication device environment interface 306 could choose to receive/use location information from a source with the least power consumption metrics.
With reference again to
If at decision block 810, the distance to the centroid is not outside the maximum radius, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 will then determine whether the mobile communication device is clearly within the geospatial zone or on the fringe of boundary of the geospatial zone. At decision block 814, a test is conducted to determine whether the distance is less than the minimum radius defined for the geospatial zone. If so, at block 816, the mobile device's current context is inside the geospatial zone. The routine 800 then proceeds to block 818.
At block 818, the mobile communication device 104 must transmit updated context information if a context state has changed. Accordingly, if the mobile communication device has not changed from outside the geospatial zone (block 812) or within the geospatial zone (block 816), no update will be provided. At block 820, the interval for collection of location information and the evaluation of the proximity to the geospatial zone will be decreased (or verified to be at a lower level). In either the case of clearly outside the geospatial zone or clearly within the geospatial zone, the likelihood of a sudden change in context decreases. For example, for a geospatial zone corresponding to an entire city, the frequency in which the mobile device would detect a change corresponding to being detected outside the citywide geospatial zone would likely be low. Accordingly, the collection interval could be adjusted in an effort to mitigate power drain associated with the collection and processing of the sensor information. The routine 800 then returns to block 804 for continued collection and processing of the information at the next collection interval.
Turning again to decision block 814, if the distance is not less than the minimum radius defined for the geospatial zone, the mobile communication device 104 is likely just within the boundary of the geospatial zone or just outside the boundary of the geospatial zone. Accordingly, the mobile communication device context processing component 304 can then determine with the mobile communication device 104 falls within or just outside of the geospatial zone. With reference to
With reference now to
As previously discussed, the mobile device communication component 102 may utilize any number of communication channels to receive the context information from the mobile communication device 104. Additionally, in the event that the context information corresponds to updated context information, especially if the mobile communication device is presently in an established communication channel, the mobile device communication component 202 may utilize alternative communication channels.
At block 904, the communication management system 102 obtains mobile communication device profile information from the mobile communication device profile store 212. As previously described, the mobile communication profile data store 212 can correspond to a database that identifies different mobile communication device profiles according to different mobile communication device context. For example, a mobile communication device may have a profile of data filtering rules for each defined geospatial region and transit state. An illustrative sub-routine for determining mobile communication device profiles will be described with regard to
At block 906, the communication management system 102 determines data availability according to the profile information obtained at block 904. The availability information may be determined upon receipt of the context information and/or may be updated upon receipt of updated context information. Additionally, if a communication channel is not already established, the availability is determined prior to receiving a request for establishing a communication channel from either the mobile communication device 104 or a third party computing device 118.
At block 908, the communication management system 102 obtains a data transmission corresponding to the mobile communication device. The data transmission can correspond to data transmissions originated by the mobile communication device 104 or data transmissions directed toward the mobile communication device 104. Still further, the data transmissions can correspond to a new exchange of data between the mobile communication device 104 and another computing device, such as computing device 112. Alternatively, the data transmissions can correspond to existing data transmissions. Illustratively, the data transmissions are processing by individual data packets that include some identification information, such as a destination IP address, transport identifier, and the like.
At decision block 910, the communication management system 102 performs a test to determine whether the mobile communication device is available to receive or transmit data. If the mobile communication device 104 has been determined to be available, at block 912, the communication management system 102 allows the data transmission to occur. The routine 900 returns to block 902.
Alternatively, if it has been determined that mobile communication device 104 is not available to transmit or receive data, at block 914, the communication management system 102 transmits a rejection or termination message, or otherwise mitigates the forwarding of the data packet. At block 916, the communication management system 102 processes the communication mitigation and the routine 900 returns to block 902. Illustratively, the communication mitigation component can correspond to the preservation of the data packets such that they are delivered once the mobile communication device 104 has a different context. In another embodiment, the communication mitigation can correspond to the deletion of packets. In still another embodiment, the communication mitigation can correspond to a special processing of data packets corresponding to VoIP communications. For example, a computing device, such as computing device 118, may be directed to voicemail or hold status while the mobile communication device remains in its current context.
Referring now to
At block 1006, the communication management system 102 determines data filter templates corresponding to the context information. In an illustrative embodiment, the data filter templates define one or more actions to be taken based on context states. As previously described, the actions can include allowing data packet communications, denying or rejecting data packets, dropping data packets, delaying data packets, diverting data packets and the like. The data filter templates will be applied to the identification information. At block 1008, the communication management system 102 determines data filters to be used by the data processing component 208 (
At block 1010, in the event that one or more data filer rules already exist, the communication management system 102 can determine differences between the existing rules and the data filtering rules determined at block 1008. Illustratively, the data differences can be used to generate updates, patches, modifications, supplements, etc. to the existing data filtering rules. At block 1012, the communication management system 102 transmits (or implements) the data filter differences to implement the data filtering rules. At block 1014, the sub-routine 1000 returns. One skilled in the art will appreciate that blocks 1012 and 104 may be omitted and that any data filtering rules can be overwritten, deleted, etc. Additionally, if no previous data filtering rules exist, blocks 1012 and 1014 may not be implemented.
While illustrative embodiments have been disclosed and discussed, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative embodiments may be implemented within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Additionally, although many embodiments have been indicated as illustrative, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the illustrative embodiments do not need to be combined or implemented together. As such, some illustrative embodiments do not need to be utilized or implemented in accordance with the scope of variations to the present disclosure.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer-readable medium storing the computer executable components, such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface. Further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above. Alternatively, some or all of the methods described herein may alternatively be embodied in specialized computer hardware. In addition, the components referred to herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/757,840, entitled “CONTEXT BASED DATA MEDIATION,” filed Apr. 9, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/168,145, entitled “CONTEXT BASED DATA MEDIATION,” filed on Apr. 9, 2009, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61168145 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12757840 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13934122 | US |