The present invention relates to systems and methods for presenting navigation; and control of television viewing services.
Interactive television (iTV) is currently available in varying forms. At the core of iTV applications are the navigation applications provided to subscribers to assist in the discovery and selection of television programming. Currently available methods and systems for browsing and selecting broadcast (linear television) are known as interactive program guides (IPGs)—or electronic program guides (EPGs). Current IPGs allow the subscriber to browse and select linear broadcast programming. These IPGs also include the ability to subset the broadcast linear program listing data by subject or type of programing.
In addition to linear broadcast television, subscribers may now also be given opportunities to select from a list of programs that are not linear, but instead are provided on demand. Such technology is generally referred to as Video on Demand (VOD). The current schemes for browsing and selecting VOD programs include the ability to select such programming from categories of programming.
Due to advances in technologies such as data compression, system operators such as cable multiple system operators (MSOs) and satellite operators are able to send more and more broadcast channels and on-demand content over their systems. This in turn has prompted broadcast content providers and programmers to develop more and more channels and on-demand content offerings. Also, the addition of digital video recorder (DVR) technology to set-top boxes (STBs) now provide additional options for time-shifted viewing of broadcast TV and increasing options for the storage of VOD titles that have been purchased for viewing, or likely-to-purchase.
The current television navigational structure is predicated on the numeric channel lineup where a channel's position is determined arbitrarily for each MSO system and without regard for clustering content type or brand. To the TV viewer, this is also manifested in the grid-based navigational tools as they are generally structured in a time-by-channel grid format. As a navigational model, this has become outdated with the increasing number of channels (500+). The problem is further exacerbated with the addition of non-linear (non time-based) On-Demand and time-shifted (DVR) content and other interactive applications such as games.
With these increasing number of TV viewing options comes a complexity of navigating the options to find something to watch. There are generally two types of viewers. One type of viewer knows the type of content they want to watch and are searching for an instance of that type of content. This is exemplified by a viewer who, wanting to watch an action film, wishes to browse available action films. The second type of viewer is one that has no specific notion of what they want to watch—they just want to find something interesting to them in a more impulse oriented manner.
The current state of technology for browsing for TV content includes searching lists of content underneath category heading or browsing large lists or grids of data to find content, or typing in search criteria. Each of these browse methods are referred to in this document as content search points. Content search points include IPG's and EPG's, Movies-On-Demand applications, text search, DVR recorded shows listings, and Category Applications as specified in the above-cited patent application. Current technology also consists of menus and toolbars that allow one to jump to the various content search points. The problem with current technology is that due to the large. amount of content on the Digital TV service, the menus and toolbars themselves are: becoming either long lists of specific content that are difficult to search, or short lists. of general categories that do not provide quick access to specific needs. Thus, the new features of digital television, new content types and the sheer volume of viewing options warrant a new navigational model for viewing television.
A contextual navigational control for digital television is described. In one embodiment a contextual navigation control interface (CNCI) includes a first area that represents a plurality of cable television programs having a first level of relevance. A second area represents a first group of the plurality of programs having a second level of relevance. A third area represents a first subgroup of the first group having a third level of relevance. A fourth area represents a second subgroup of the first group having a fourth level of relevance. There may be additional areas representing additional sub-groups of relevance to the current viewing context.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
The present invention provides, in various embodiments, systems and methods by which subscribers are presented with a dynamic navigational interface for linking to content. This dynamic navigational interface speeds access to content by providing a minimal graphical interface and by first presenting contextual options to the viewer that are relevant to the currently viewed program, channel, provider or genre of same. The contextual options are further divided in the user presentation along multiple levels or dimensions from general to more specific relative to the currently viewed content.
Described herein are systems and methods by which subscribers are presented with dynamic iTV navigational hierarchies that first present navigational options based on relevance to the available content on television, and to the currently viewed program, channel, provider or genre of program, channel or provider. In current navigational systems users are provided menus from which they can select a target content search point. These menus are either presented as long lists of options or as very short lists. The long lists provide greater subdivision of content but create a navigational obstacle in that the lists must be scanned to find a link to a specific content of interest. The short lists provide content search points that are much too general such that if the link is selected, the viewer is taken to yet another page for further categorization or the viewer is presented with a large set of content that must be browsed. The present invention enables the quick access to multiple levels of granularity of content categorization on a single menu, by using the context of the currently viewed program to set the state of the navigational control when displayed.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. As one example, the terms subscriber, user, viewer are used interchangeably throughout this description. In some instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form, rather than in detail, in order to avoid obscuring the present invention. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical, and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions•that follow are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of acts leading to a desired result. The acts are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, signals, datum, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
The present invention can be implemented by an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer, selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
The algorithms and processes presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method. For example, any of the methods according to the present invention can be implemented in hard-wired circuitry, by programming a general-purpose processor or by any combination of hardware and software. One of skill in the art will immediately appreciate that the invention can be practiced with computer system configurations other than those described below, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, DSP devices, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below.
The methods of the invention may be implemented using computer software. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, sequences of instructions designed to implement the methods can be compiled for execution on a variety of hardware platforms and for interface to a variety of operating systems. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, application, etc.), as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of saying that execution of the software by a computer causes the processor of the computer to perform an action or produce a result.
An Exemplary Cable Television System
The head-end 110 is the initial distribution center for a CATV system 100. The head-end 110 is where incoming video and television signal sources (e.g., video tape, satellites, local studios) are received, amplified and modulated onto TV carrier channels for transmission on the CATV cabling system. The cable distribution system is a cable (fiber or coax) that is used to transfer signals from the head-end 110 to the end-users. The cable is attached to the television 131 through a set-top box 132. The set-top box 132 adapts the signals from the head-end 110 to a format suitable for the television 131. Additionally, the set-top box 132 renders a user interface through which the end-user navigates through menus to select programming to view.
CATV system 100 allows two-way data transmission. Data is provided by a cable modem 133 in the residence 130 and data gateway (cable modem termination system (CMTS)) 111 at the head-end 110. The CMTS 111 also provides an interface to other networks such as the Internet 140. Furthermore, CATV system 100 allows cable telephony to initiate, process and receive voice communications. Telephony is provided by a voice gateway 112 at the head-end 110 that converts communication signals between data networks and telephone networks (e.g., PSTN) 150. The data and telephony attributes of CATV system 100 described above, are for the reader's benefit to appreciate the entire CATV system 100. However, the present system for contextual navigational control may be mainly associated with the digital television content delivery aspects of CATV system 100.
To further understand the present invention consider that all content has descriptive attributes. For example, the show “Sopranos” could be described by the following four attributes: HBO, Drama, Primetime, Crime. These attribute dimensions, namely Provider, Genre, Time of Day and Content are chosen purely for illustration, and additional categories or dimension could easily be identified. The type and number of attributes is variable and may be unique to an article of content. In the navigational model described by this invention, these attributes are the doorways to other content of interest based on the notion that what the viewer is watching has some basic attributes that are of interest to the viewer and can be predictive of where the viewer may wish to navigate.
In one embodiment, the present contextual navigational control has four selection dimensions, or levels, with increasing contextual relevance to the currently broadcast program.
Level one (All Listings 210) represents the links to general system function, in particular, it allows the user to select how he/she wishes to interact with the present contextual navigation control.
Returning to
In this manner, the contextual display and dynamic positioning of the relevant links related to a current program, provider, category or genre of same, will assist the viewer to more quickly navigate to the programming they desire. The possible links are also navigable by the viewer once the selection is moved to highlight an element of the present contextual navigation control, as illustrated by
Returning to
For the purpose of illustrating the third level's relevance (Channel/Provider Related link 230),
The ‘Discovery’ example is provided to illustrate that multiple channels may link to a single channel-family content application. All of the possible links are also navigable by the viewer once the selection is moved to highlight this element of the contextual navigation control.
Returning to
It will also be apparent that the relationships to categories may be specified in any manner and may contain additional levels of relevance. For instance, in the example of a viewer watching football on ESPN, the first order of relevance was content category (sports), the second order of relevance was the current channel (ESPN), a third order of relevance can be added to be specific to the program. For example if the game were a college game between LSU and Florida then an additional order of relevance might be a link to an application for ‘College football’ or for ‘South-Eastern Conference’.
An Exemplary Network Architecture
Elements of the present invention may be included within a client-server based system 500 such as that illustrated in
Servers 510 may include a database for storing various types of data. This may include, for example, specific client data (e.g., user account information and user preferences) and/or more general data. The database on servers 510 in one embodiment runs an instance of a Relational Database Management System (RDBMS), such as Microsoft™ SQL-Server, Oracle™ or the like. A user/client may interact with and receive feedback from servers 510 using various different communication devices and/or protocols. According to one embodiment, a user connects to servers 510 via client software. The client software may include a browser application such as Netscape Navigator™ or Microsoft Internet Explorer™ on the user's personal computer, which communicates to servers 510 via the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (hereinafter “HTTP”). In other embodiments included within the scope of the invention, clients may communicate with servers 510 via cellular phones and pagers (e.g., in which the necessary transaction software is electronic in a microchip), handheld computing devices, and/or touch-tone telephones (or video phones). According to another embodiment, set-top boxes 570-575 connects to servers 510 via a TV application.
Servers 510 may also communicate over a larger network (e.g., network 525) with other servers 550-552. This may include, for example, servers maintained by businesses to host their Web sites—e.g., content servers such as “yahoo.com.” Network 525 may include router 520. Router 520 forwards data packets from one local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN) to another. Based on routing tables and routing protocols, router 520 reads the network address in each IP packet and makes a decision on how to send if based on the most expedient route. Router 520 works at layer 3 in the protocol stack.
An Exemplary Computer Architecture
Having briefly described an exemplary network architecture which employs various elements of the present invention, a computer system 600 representing exemplary clients 530-535, set-top boxes 570-575 (e.g., set-top box 132) and/or servers (e.g., servers 510), in which elements of the present invention may be implemented will now be described with reference to
One embodiment of computer system 600 comprises a system bus 620 for communicating information, and a processor 610 coupled to bus 620 for processing information. Computer system 600 further comprises a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device 625 (referred to herein as main memory), coupled to bus 620 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 610. Main memory 625 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 610. Computer system 600 also may include a read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 626 coupled to bus 620 for storing static information and instructions used by processor 610.
A data storage device 627 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 600 for storing information and instructions. Computer system 600 can also be coupled to a second I/0 bus 650 via an I/0 interface 630. Multiple I/0 devices may be coupled to I/0 bus 650, including a display device 643, an input device (e.g., an alphanumeric input device 642 and/or a cursor control device 641). For example, video news clips and related information may be presented to the user on the display device 643.
The communication device 640 is for accessing other computers (servers or clients) via a network 525, 540. The communication device 640 may comprise a modem, a network interface card, or other well-known interface device, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of networks.
A contextual navigational control for digital television has been described. It will be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
The present application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/968,160, filed May 1, 2018, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/279,645, filed May 16, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,992,546, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/925,737 filed Aug. 24, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,819,734, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/664,275, filed Sep. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,703,116. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/925,737 also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/552,998, filed Mar. 11, 2004. The disclosures of each of the aforementioned are incorporated by reference herein in their entity.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5287489 | Nimmo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321750 | Nadan | Jun 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5485221 | Banker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521841 | Arman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530939 | Mansfield, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5583563 | Wanderscheid et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594509 | Florin | Jan 1997 | A |
5613057 | Caravel | Mar 1997 | A |
5621456 | Florin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5657072 | Aristides et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659793 | Escobar et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675752 | Scott et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694176 | Bruette et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737552 | Lavallee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5802284 | Karlton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818438 | Howe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826102 | Escobar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844620 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852435 | Vigneaux et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860073 | Ferrel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883677 | Hofmann | Mar 1999 | A |
5892902 | Clark | Apr 1999 | A |
5892905 | Brandt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905492 | Straub et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929849 | Kikinis | Jul 1999 | A |
5945987 | Dunn | Aug 1999 | A |
5960194 | Choy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5990890 | Etheredge | Nov 1999 | A |
5996025 | Day et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005561 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008083 | Brabazon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008803 | Rowe | Dec 1999 | A |
6008836 | Bruck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016144 | Blonstein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025837 | Matthews, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038560 | Wical | Mar 2000 | A |
6049823 | Hwang | Apr 2000 | A |
6061695 | Slivka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067108 | Yokote et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088722 | Herz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091411 | Straub et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094237 | Hashimoto | Jul 2000 | A |
6141003 | Chor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148081 | Szymanski et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162697 | Singh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169543 | Wehmeyer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172677 | Stautner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191781 | Chaney et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195692 | Hsu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205582 | Hoarty | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219839 | Sampsell | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239795 | Ulrich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240555 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6281940 | Sciammarella | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292187 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295057 | Rosin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314569 | Chernock et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317885 | Fries | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345305 | Beck et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6405239 | Addington et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415438 | Blackketter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421067 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426779 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442755 | Lemmons et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477705 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486920 | Arai et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6522342 | Gagnon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529950 | Lumelsky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530082 | Del Sesto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532589 | Proehl et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564263 | Bergman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567104 | Andrew et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571392 | Zigmond et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591292 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6621509 | Eiref et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636887 | Augeri | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658661 | Arsenault et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678891 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684400 | Goode et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694312 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704359 | Bayrakeri et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731310 | Craycroft et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745367 | Bates et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760043 | Markel | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763522 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766526 | Ellis | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6806887 | Chernock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6857128 | Borden, IV et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6886029 | Pecus et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6904610 | Bayrakeri et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6910191 | Segerberg et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918131 | Rautila et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6963880 | Pingte et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7028327 | Dougherty et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7065785 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7080400 | Navar | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103904 | Blackketter et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114170 | Harris et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134072 | Lovett et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7152236 | Wugofski et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162694 | Venolia | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162697 | Markel | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174512 | Martin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177861 | Tovinkere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197715 | Valeria | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7207057 | Rowe | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213005 | Mourad et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221801 | Jang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7237252 | Billmaier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7293275 | Krieger et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7305696 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313806 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7337457 | Pack et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7360232 | Mitchell | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363612 | Satuloori et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7406705 | Crinon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7440967 | Chidlovskii | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7464344 | Carmichael et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472137 | Edelstein et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7490092 | Sibley et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516468 | Deller et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7523180 | DeLuca et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7587415 | Gaurav et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624416 | Vandermolen et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7640487 | Amielh-Caprioglio et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702315 | Engstrom et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703116 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7721307 | Hendricks et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743330 | Hendricks et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7752258 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7861259 | Barone, Jr. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7913286 | Sarachik et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7958528 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975277 | Jerding et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8006262 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032914 | Rodriguez | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8156533 | Crichton | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8220018 | de Andrade et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266652 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8296805 | Tabatabai et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8365230 | Chane et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8381259 | Khosla | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8434109 | Kamimaeda et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448208 | Moreau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8660545 | Redford et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8699862 | Sharifi et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8793256 | McIntire et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8850495 | Pan | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8863196 | Patil et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938675 | Holladay et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943533 | de Andrade et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8973063 | Spilo et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9021528 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9363560 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9473548 | Chakrovorthy et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9516253 | De Andrade et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010014206 | Artigalas et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027563 | White et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049823 | Matey | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056573 | Kovac et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056577 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010928 | Sahota | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016969 | Kimble | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023270 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026642 | Augenbraun et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032905 | Sherr et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035573 | Black et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041104 | Graf et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042915 | Kubischta et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042920 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059094 | Hosea et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059586 | Carney et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059629 | Markel | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067376 | Martin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069407 | Fagnani et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070978 | Wishoff et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078444 | Krewin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078449 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083450 | Kamen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100041 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104083 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107973 | Lennon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108121 | Alao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108122 | Alao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120609 | Lang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124254 | Kikinis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124256 | Suzuka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144268 | Khoo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144269 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144273 | Reto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147645 | Alao et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152477 | Goodman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156839 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156890 | Carlyle et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162120 | Mitchell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169885 | Alao et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170059 | Hoang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171691 | Currans et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171940 | He et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184629 | Sie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188944 | Noble | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194181 | Wachtel | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196268 | Wolff et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199187 | Gissin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199190 | Su | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001880 | Holtz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005444 | Crinon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005453 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014752 | Zaslavsky et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014753 | Beach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018755 | Masterson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023970 | Panabaker | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023975 | Schrader et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025832 | Swart et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028871 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028873 | Lemmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041104 | Wingard et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051246 | Wilder et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056216 | Wugofski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056218 | Wingard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058948 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061028 | Dey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066081 | Barone et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067554 | Klarfeld et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068046 | Lindqvist et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070170 | Lennon | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079226 | Barrett | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084443 | Laughlin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084444 | Ullman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084449 | Chane et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086694 | Davidsson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093792 | Labeeb et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097657 | Zhou et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110500 | Rodriguez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115219 | Chadwick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115612 | Mao et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126601 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132971 | Billmaier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135464 | Mourad et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135582 | Allen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140097 | Schloer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158777 | Schiff et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172370 | Satuloori et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177501 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182663 | Gudorf et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189668 | Newnam et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204814 | Elo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204846 | Breen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204854 | Blackketter et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207696 | Willenegger et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226141 | Krasnow et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229899 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003402 | McKenna | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003404 | Boston et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019900 | Knightbridge et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019908 | Williams et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022271 | Fichet et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024753 | Chane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025180 | Begeja et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031015 | Ben-Romdhane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031062 | Lemmons | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039754 | Harple | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073915 | Dureau | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078814 | Allen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107437 | Reichardt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107439 | Hassell et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111465 | Chuang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128699 | Delpuch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133923 | Watson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136698 | Mock | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168186 | Rector et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172648 | Xu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189658 | Dowdy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194136 | Finseth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199578 | Kapczynski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221306 | Noh | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224723 | Farcasiu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225751 | Urali | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226051 | Carney et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005288 | Novak | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015796 | Bruckner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015804 | LaJoie et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028208 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086172 | Stefik | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125835 | Wei | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149972 | Knudson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155063 | Bayrakeri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160458 | Baumgartner | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166230 | Gaydou | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050204385 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259147 | Nam et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262542 | DeWeese et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283800 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287948 | Hellwagner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004743 | Murao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060059525 | Jerding et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068818 | Leitersdorf et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080707 | Laksono | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080716 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104511 | Guo et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105793 | Gutowski et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125962 | Shelton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143191 | Cho et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156336 | Knudson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195865 | Fablet | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200842 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206470 | McIntyre | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206912 | Klarfeld et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233514 | Weng et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248572 | Kitsukama et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070019001 | Ha | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050343 | Siddaramappa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064715 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083538 | Roy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112761 | Xu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157247 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070211762 | Song et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214123 | Messer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214488 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239707 | Collins et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250901 | McIntire et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260700 | Messer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261072 | Boulet et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271587 | Rowe | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037722 | Klassen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060011 | Kelts | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060020 | Kelts | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071770 | Schloter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092201 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113504 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126109 | Cragun et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133504 | Messer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148317 | Opaluch | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163304 | Ellis | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183681 | Messer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183698 | Messer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189740 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196070 | White et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204595 | Rathod et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208796 | Messer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208839 | Sheshagiri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221989 | Messer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235209 | Rathod et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235393 | Kunjithapatham et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235725 | Hendricks | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250010 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256097 | Messer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266449 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276278 | Krieger et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282294 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288641 | Messer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288644 | Gilfix et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301320 | Morris | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301732 | Archer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006315 | Mukherjea et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019485 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024629 | Miyauchi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025054 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083257 | Bargeron et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094113 | Berry et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094632 | Newnam et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094651 | Damm et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123021 | Jung et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133025 | Malhotra et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164904 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183210 | Andrade | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222872 | Schlack | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228441 | Sandvik | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240650 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249427 | Dunnigan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271829 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288132 | Hegde | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292548 | Van Court | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100023966 | Shahraray et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100077057 | Godin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079670 | Frazier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100175084 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180300 | Carpenter et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223640 | Reichardt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250190 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251284 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257548 | Lee et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110055282 | Hoving | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058101 | Earley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087348 | Wong | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093909 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110131204 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176787 | DeCamp | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209180 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211813 | Marks | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214143 | Rits et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219386 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246495 | Mallinson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247042 | Mallinson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120002111 | Sandoval et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011550 | Holland | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120054811 | Spears | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066602 | Chai et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120117151 | Bill | May 2012 | A1 |
20120185905 | Kelley | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192226 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120227073 | Hosein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233646 | Coniglio et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120295686 | Lockton | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324002 | Chen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324494 | Burger et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324495 | Matthews, III et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324518 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130014155 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130040623 | Chun et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051770 | Sargent | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130103446 | Bragdon et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110769 | Ito | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111514 | Slavin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130170813 | Woods et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176493 | Khosla | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198642 | Carney et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262997 | Markworth et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298038 | Spivack et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316716 | Tapia et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326570 | Cowper et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332839 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332852 | Castanho et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332855 | Roman et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347018 | Limp et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347030 | Oh et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006951 | Hunter | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009680 | Moon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140026068 | Park et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032473 | Enoki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140053078 | Kannan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068648 | Green et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075465 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082519 | Wang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089423 | Jackels | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089967 | Mandalia et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140129570 | Johnson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149918 | Asokan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150022 | Oh et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140237498 | Ivins | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267931 | Gilson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279852 | Chen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280695 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282122 | Mathur | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140325359 | Vehovsky et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140327677 | Walker | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334381 | Subramaniam et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359662 | Packard et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365302 | Walker | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373032 | Merry et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150020096 | Walker | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026743 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150263923 | Kruglick | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0624039 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0963115 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1058999 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1080582 | Mar 2001 | EP |
2323489 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2448874 | Nov 2008 | GB |
2448875 | Nov 2008 | GB |
9963757 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2000011869 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0033576 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0110115 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0182613 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2001084830 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02063426 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063471 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063851 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063878 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03009126 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003026275 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2007115224 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008053132 | May 2008 | WO |
2011053271 | May 2011 | WO |
2012094105 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012154541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Pat. No. 7,703,116, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications That Blend Programming Information of On-Demand and Broadcast Service Offerings, Sep. 16, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,805,746, Optimized Application On-The-Wire Format for Construction, Delivery and Display of Enhanced Television, Oct. 18, 2005. |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,667, Verification of Semantic Constraints in Multimedia Data and in Its Announcement, Signaling and Interchange, May 3, 2006. |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,958,528, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications That Blend Programming Information of On-Demand and Broadcast Service Offerings, Mar. 24, 2010. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,042,132, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Content, Mar. 14, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,018, System and Method for Preferred Placement Programing of iTV Content, Sep. 2, 2004. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,352,983, Programming Contextual Interactive User Interface for Television, Jul. 11, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,365,230, Interactive User Interface for Television Applications, Sep. 19, 2002. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,413,205, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Displax of iTV Content, Jul. 29, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,416,952, Channel Family Surf Control, Jul. 19, 2004. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,448,208, System an Method for Construction, Delivery, and Display of ITV Applications that Blend, Mar. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,578,411, System and Method for Controlling iTV Application Behaviors Through the Use of Application Profile Filters, Sep. 25, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,707,354, Graphically Rich, Modular, Promotional Tile Interface for Interactive Television, Jun. 12, 2003. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,745,658, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Content, Jun. 16, 2011. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,756,634, Programming Contextual Interactive User Interface for Television, Sep. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,819,734, Contextual Navigational Control for Digital Television, Aug. 24, 2004. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,850,480, Interactive User Interface for Television Applications, Jan. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,943,533, System and Method for Preferred Placement Programing of iTV Content, May 31, 2012. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,021,528, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications That Blend, Apr. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,197,938, Programming Contextual Interactive User Interface for Television, Jan. 29, 2014. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,363,560, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications That Blend Programming Information of On-Demand and Broadcast Service Offerings, Mar. 18, 2015. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,414,022, Verification of Semantic Constraints in Multimedia Data and In Its Announcement, Signaling and Interchange, Sep. 8, 2010. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,451,196, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Content, Jun. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,516,253, System and Method for Preferred Placement Programming of iTV Content, Dec. 16, 2014. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,553,927, Synchronizing Multiple Transmissions of Content, Mar. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,729,924, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications That Blend Programming Information of On-Demand and Broadcast Service Offerings, Apr. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,967,611, Prioritized Placement of Content Elements for iTV Applications, Oct. 6, 2016. |
U.S. Pat. No. 9,992,546, Contextual Navigational Control for Digital Television, May 16, 2014. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,110,973, Verification of Semantic Constraints in Multimedia Data and in its Announcement, Signaling and Interchange, May 5, 2016. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,149,014, Interactive User Interface for Television Applications, Jan. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,171,878, System and Method for Controlling iTV Application Behaviors through the Use of Application Profile Filters, Sep. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,237,617, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Applications that Blend Programming Information of On-Demand and Broadcast Service Offerings, Jun. 30, 2017. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,942, Prioritized Placement of Content Elements for iTV Applications, Mar. 1, 2018. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,575,070, Validation of Content, Aug. 31, 2018. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,587,930, Interactive User Interface for Television Applications, Oct. 15, 2018. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,602,225, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Content, Feb. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,616,644, System and Method for Blending Linear Content, Non-Linear Content, or Managed Content, Jan. 18, 2019. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,664,138, Providing Supplemental Content, Mar. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,687,114, System and Method for Controlling iTV Application Behaviors Through the Use of Application Profile Filters, Nov. 13, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/968,160, Contextual Navigational Control for Digital Television, filed May 1, 2018. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,848,830, Content Event Messaging, Mar. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Pat. No. 10,880,609, Method and Apparatus for Delivering Video and Video Related Content as Sub-Asset Level, Nov. 20, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/306,752, Broadcast Database, filed Nov. 27, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/635,799, User Customization of User Interfaces for Interactive Television, filed Aug. 5, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/274,452, Method and Apparatus for Delivering Video and Video Related Content as Sub-Asset Level, filed Nov. 20, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/671,626, Crowdsourcing Supplemental Content, filed Nov. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/520,819, Systems and Methods for Curating Content Metadata, filed Oct. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/842,196, System and Method for Construction, Delivery and Display of iTV Content, filed Sep. 1, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/740,921, Validation of Content, filed Jan. 13, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/746,111, System and Method for Blending Linear Content, Non-Linear Content, or Managed Content, filed Jan. 17, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/851,814, Providing Supplemental Content for a Second Screen Experience, filed Apr. 17, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/100,341, Content Event Messaging, filed Nov. 20, 2020. |
Andreas Kraft and Klaus Hofrichter, “An Approach for Script-Based Broadcast Application Production”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 74-82, 1999. |
Fernando Pereira, “The MPEG-4 Book”, Prentice Hall, Jul. 10, 2002. |
Michael Adams, “Open Cable Architecture”, Cisco Press, Dec. 3, 1999. |
Mark Riehl, “XML and Perl”, Sams, Oct. 16, 2002. |
MetaTV, Inc., PCT/US02/29917 filed Sep. 19, 2002, International Search Report dated Apr. 14, 2003; ISA/US; 6 pages. |
Sylvain Devillers, “Bitstream Syntax Definition Language: an Input to MPEG-21 Content Representation”, Mar. 2001, ISO, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG01/M7053. |
Shim, et al., “A SMIL Based Graphical Interface for Interactive TV”, Internet Tech. Laboratory Dept. of Comp. Engineering, San Jose State University, pp. 257-266, 2003. |
Yoon, et al., “Video Gadget: MPET-7 Based Audio-Visual Content Indexing and Browsing Engine”, LG Electronics Institute of Technology, 2001, pp. 59-68. |
Watchwith webpage; http://www.watchwith.com/content_owners/watchwith_plalform_components.jsp (last visited Mar. 12, 2013). |
Matt Duffy; TVplus App reveals content click-through rates north of 10% across sync enabled programming; http://www.tvplus.com/blog/TVplus-App-reveals-content-click-through-rates-north-of-10-Percent-across-sync-enabled- programming (retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Mar. 12, 2013). |
“In Time for Academy Awards Telecast, Companion TV App Umami Debuts First Real-Time Sharing of a TV Program's Images”; Umami News; http:www.umami.tv/2012-02-23.html (retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Mar. 12, 2013). |
European Patent Application No. 09175979.5—Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2011. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,685,833—Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2012. |
Li, Y. et al. “Reliable Video Clock Time Recognition”, Pattern Recognition, 2006, 1CPR 1006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 4 pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 1, 2010. |
Salton et al., Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1968, pp. 8-36. |
Smith, J.R. et al., An Image and Video Search Engine for the World-Wide Web Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases 5, San Jose, Feb. 13-14, 1997, Proceedings of Spie, Bellingham, Spie, US, vol. 3022, Feb. 13, 1997, pp. 84-95. |
Kontothoanassis, Ledonias et al. “Design, Implementation, and Analysis of a Multimedia Indexing and Delivery Server”, Technical Report Series, Aug. 1999, Cambridge Research Laboratory. |
Messer, Alan et al., “SeeNSearch: A context Directed Search Facilitator for Home Entertainment Devices”, Paper, Samsung Information Systems America Inc., San Jose, CA, 2008. |
Boulgouris N. V. et al., “Real-Time Compressed-Domain Spatiotemporal Segmentation and Ontologies for Video Indexing and Retrieval”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 606-621, May 2004. |
Changsheng Xu et al., “Using Webcast Text for Semantic Event Detection in Broadcast Sports Video”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 1342-1355, Nov. 2008. |
Liang Bai et al., “Video Semantic Content Analysis based on Ontology”, International Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference, pp. 117-124, Sep. 2007. |
Koskela M. et al., “Measuring Concept Similarities in Multimedia Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluations”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 912-922, Aug. 2007. |
Steffan Staab et al., “Semantic Multimedia”, Reasoning Web; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 125-170, Sep. 2008. |
European Search Report for Application No. 09180776.8, dated Jun. 7, 2010, 9 pages. |
European Search Report, EP 09 18 0762, completion date Mar. 22, 2010. |
European Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2010. |
EP Application No. 09 179 987.4-1241—Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2011. |
European Application No. 09 175 979.5—Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2011. |
Boronat F et al: “Multimedia group and inter-stream synchronization techniques: A comparative study”, Information Systems. Pergamon Press. Oxford. GB. vol. 34. No. 1. Mar. 1, 2009 (Mar. 1, 2009). pp. 108-131. XP025644936. |
Extended European Search Report—EP14159227.9—dated Sep. 3, 2014. |
Canadian Office Action—CA 2,685,833—dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
European Extended Search Report—EP 13192112.4—dated May 11, 2015. |
CA Response to Office Action—CA Appl. 2,685,833—Submitted Jul. 17, 2015. |
Response to European Office Action—European Appl. 13192112.4—submitted Dec. 9, 2015. |
CA Office Action—CA App 2,685,833—dated Jan. 27, 2016. |
European Office Action—EP App 14159227.9—dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
Agnieszka Zagozdzinnska et al. “TRIDAQ Systems in HEP Experiments at LHC Accelerator” Kwartalnik Elektroniki I Telekomunikacji, vol. 59, No. 4, Oct. 2013. |
CA Office Action—CA Application 2685833—dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
Nov. 29, 2017—Canadian Office Action—CA 2,685,833. |
Feb. 19, 2018—European Summons to Oral Proceedings—EP 14159227.9. |
Mar. 9, 2018—European Office Action—EP 13192112.4. |
Jul. 31, 2018—European Decision to Refuse—14159227.9. |
Sep. 5, 2019—Canadian Office Action—CA 2,685,833. |
Nov. 6, 2019—Canadian Office Action—CA 2,832,800. |
Apr. 21, 2020—European Summons to Oral Proceedings—EP 09175979.5. |
Aug. 24, 2020, Canadian Office Action, CA 2,832,800. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210051376 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60552998 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15968160 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 17076446 | US | |
Parent | 14279645 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15968160 | US | |
Parent | 10925737 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 14279645 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10664275 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 10925737 | US |