Patent Grant
11872055
This invention relates generally to the field of analyte monitoring, such as continuous glucose monitoring.
Diabetes is a chronic disease in which the body does not produce or properly utilize insulin, a hormone that regulates blood glucose. Insulin may be administered to a diabetic patient to help regulate blood glucose levels, though blood glucose levels must nevertheless be carefully monitored to help ensure that timing and dosage are appropriate. Without proper management of their condition, diabetic patients may suffer from a variety of complications resulting from hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels) or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar levels).
Blood glucose monitors help diabetic patients manage their condition by measuring blood glucose levels from a sample of blood. For example, a diabetic patient may obtain a blood sample through a fingerstick sampling mechanism, transfer the blood sample to a test strip with suitable reagent(s) that react with the blood sample, and use a blood glucose monitor to analyze the test strip to measure glucose level in that blood sample. However, a patient using this process can typically only measure his or her glucose levels at discrete instances in time, which may fail to capture a hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia condition in a timely manner. Yet a more recent variety of glucose monitor is a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device, which includes implantable transdermal electrochemical sensors that are used to continuously detect and quantify blood glucose levels by proxy measurement of glucose levels in the subcutaneous interstitial fluid. However, conventional CGM devices also have weaknesses including tissue trauma from insertion and signal latency (e.g., due to the time required for the glucose analyte to diffuse from capillary sources to the sensor). These weaknesses also lead to a number of drawbacks, such as pain experienced by the patient when electrochemical sensors are inserted, and limited accuracy in glucose measurements, particularly when blood glucose levels are changing rapidly. Accordingly, there is a need for a new and improved analyte monitoring system.
In some variations, a microneedle array for use in sensing an analyte may include a plurality of microneedles (e.g., solid microneedles). Each microneedle may include a tapered distal portion having an insulated distal apex, and an electrode on a surface of the tapered distal portion, where the electrode is located proximal to the insulated distal apex.
In some variations, a method for monitoring a user may include accessing a body fluid of a user with an analyte monitoring device, and quantifying one or more analytes in the body fluid using the analyte monitoring device, where the analyte monitoring device may include a plurality of solid microneedles. In some variations, at least one of the microneedles may include a tapered distal portion having an insulated distal apex, and an electrode on a surface of the tapered distal portion, where the electrode is located proximal to the insulated distal apex.
In some variations, a microneedle array for use in sensing an analyte may include a plurality of solid microneedles, where at least one microneedle includes a tapered distal portion having an insulated distal apex, and an electrode on a surface of the tapered distal portion, where a distal end of the electrode is offset from the distal apex.
In some variations, a method of sterilizing an analyte monitoring device may include exposing the analyte monitoring device to a sterilant gas, where the analyte monitoring device comprises a wearable housing, a microneedle array extending from the housing and comprising an analyte sensor, and an electronics system arranged in the housing and electrically coupled to the microneedle array. The analyte monitoring device may be exposed to the sterilant gas for a dwell time sufficient to sterilize the analyte monitoring device.
In some variations, a microneedle array for an analyte monitoring device may include a plurality of sensing microneedles (e.g., solid microneedles), where each sensing microneedle includes a tapered distal portion comprising a working electrode configured to sense an analyte, and a body portion providing a conductive connection to the working electrode. The body portion of each sensing microneedle may be insulated such that each working electrode is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other working electrode in the microneedle array.
In some variations, a microneedle array for a body-worn analyte monitoring device may include at least one microneedle including a pyramidal body portion having anon-circular (e.g., octagonal base), and a tapered distal portion extending from the body portion and comprising an electrode, where the distal portion comprises a planar surface that is offset from a distal apex of the at least one microneedle.
In some variations, a method for monitoring a user may include accessing a dermal interstitial fluid of the user at a plurality of sensor locations with an integrated analyte monitoring device comprising a single microneedle array, and quantifying one or more analytes in the dermal interstitial fluid using a plurality of working electrodes in the microneedle array, where each working electrode is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other working electrode in the analyte monitoring device.
In some variations, a body-worn analyte monitoring device may include a wearable housing and a microneedle array. The microneedle array may extend outwardly from the housing and include at least one microneedle configured to measure one or more analytes in a user wearing the housing, and the housing may include a user interface configured to communicate information indicative of the measurement of the one or more analytes.
In some variations, a method for monitoring a user may include measuring one or more analytes in the user using a body-worn analyte monitoring device comprising a wearable housing and one or more analyte sensors, and communicating information indicative of the measurement of the one or more analytes through a user interface on the housing.
Non-limiting examples of various aspects and variations of the invention are described herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
As generally described herein, an analyte monitoring system may include an analyte monitoring device that is worn by a user and includes one or more sensors for monitoring at least one analyte of a user. The sensors may, for example, include one or more electrodes configured to perform electrochemical detection of at least one analyte. The analyte monitoring device may communicate sensor data to an external computing device for storage, display, and/or analysis of sensor data. For example, as shown in
The analyte monitoring devices described herein have characteristics that improve a number of properties that are advantageous for a continuous analyte monitoring device such as a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. For example, the analyte monitoring device described herein have improved sensitivity (amount of sensor signal produced per given concentration of target analyte), improved selectivity (rejection of endogenous and exogenous circulating compounds that can interfere with the detection of the target analyte), and improved stability to help minimize change in sensor response over time through storage and operation of the analyte monitoring device. Additionally, compared to conventional continuous analyte monitoring devices, the analyte monitoring devices described herein have a shorter warm-up time that enables the sensor(s) to quickly provide a stable sensor signal following implantation, as well as a short response time that enables the sensors(s) to quickly provide a stable sensor signal following a change in analyte concentration in the user. Furthermore, as described in further detail below, the analyte monitoring devices described herein may be applied to and function in a variety of wear sites, and provide for pain-free sensor insertion for the user. Other properties such as biocompatibility, sterilizability, and mechanical integrity are also optimized in the analyte monitoring devices described herein.
Although the analyte monitoring systems described herein may be described with reference to monitoring of glucose (e.g., in users with Type 2 diabetes, Type 1 diabetes), it should be understood that such systems may additionally or alternatively be configured to sense and monitor other suitable analytes. As described in further detail below, suitable target analytes for detection may, for example, include glucose, ketones, lactate, and cortisol. One target analyte may be monitored, or multiple target analytes may be simultaneously monitored (e.g., in the same analyte monitoring device). For example, monitoring of other target analytes may enable the monitoring of other indications such as stress (e.g., through detection of rising cortisol and glucose) and ketoacidosis (e.g., through detection of rising ketones).
Various aspects of example variations of the analyte monitoring systems, and methods of use thereof, are described in further detail below.
Analyte Monitoring Device
As shown in
An electronics system 120 may be at least partially arranged in the housing 112 and include various electronic components, such as sensor circuitry 124 configured to perform signal processing (e.g., biasing and readout of electrochemical sensors, converting the analog signals from the electrochemical sensors to digital signals, etc.). The electronics system 120 may also include at least one microcontroller 122 for controlling the analyte monitoring device 110, at least one communication module 126, at least one power source 130, and/or other various suitable passive circuitry 127. The microcontroller 122 may, for example, be configured to interpret digital signals output from the sensor circuitry 124 (e.g., by executing a programmed routine in firmware), perform various suitable algorithms or mathematical transformations (e.g., calibration, etc.), and/or route processed data to and/or from the communication module 124. In some variations, the communication module 126 may include a suitable wireless transceiver (e.g., Bluetooth transceiver or the like) for communicating data with an external computing device 102 via one or more antennas 128. For example, the communication module 126 may be configured to provide uni-directional and/or bi-directional communication of data with an external computing device 102 that is paired with the analyte monitoring device 110. The power source 130 may provide power for the analyte monitoring device 110, such as for the electronics system. The power source 130 may include battery or other suitable source, and may, in some variations, be rechargeable and/or replaceable. Passive circuitry 127 may include various non-powered electrical circuitry (e.g., resistors, capacitors, inductors, etc.) providing interconnections between other electronic components, etc. The passive circuitry 127 may be configured to perform noise reduction, biasing and/or other purposes, for example. In some variations, the electronic components in the electronics system 120 may be arranged on one or more printed circuit boards (PCB), which may be rigid, semi-rigid, or flexible, for example. Additional details of the electronics system 120 are described further below.
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device 110 may further include one or more additional sensors 150 to provide additional information that may be relevant for user monitoring. For example, the analyte monitoring device 110 may further include at least one temperature sensor (e.g., thermistor) configured to measure skin temperature, thereby enabling temperature compensation for the sensor measurements obtained by the microneedle array electrochemical sensors.
In some variations, the microneedle array 140 in the analyte monitoring device 110 may be configured to puncture skin of a user. As shown in
In contrast to traditional continuous analyte monitoring devices (e.g., CGM devices), which include sensors typically implanted between about 8 mm and about 10 mm beneath the skin surface in the subcutis or adipose layer of the skin, the analyte monitoring device 110 has a shallower microneedle insertion depth of about 0.25 mm (such that electrodes are implanted in the upper dermal region of the skin) that provides numerous benefits. These benefits include access to dermal interstitial fluid including one or more target analytes for detection, which is advantageous at least because at least some types of analyte measurements of dermal interstitial fluid have been found to closely correlate to those of blood. For example, it has been discovered that glucose measurements performed using electrochemical sensors accessing dermal interstitial fluid are advantageously highly linearly correlated with blood glucose measurements. Accordingly, glucose measurements based on dermal interstitial fluid are highly representative of blood glucose measurements.
Additionally, because of the shallower microneedle insertion depth of the analyte monitoring device 110, a reduced time delay in analyte detection is obtained compared to traditional continuous analyte monitoring devices. Such a shallower insertion depth positions the sensor surfaces in close proximity (e.g., within a few hundred micrometers or less) to the dense and well-perfused capillary bed of the reticular dermis, resulting in a negligible diffusional lag from the capillaries to the sensor surface. Diffusion time is related to diffusion distance according to t=x2/(2D) where t is the diffusion time, x is the diffusion distance, and D is the mass diffusivity of the analyte of interest. Therefore, positioning an analyte sensing element twice as far away from the source of an analyte in a capillary will result in a quadrupling of the diffusional delay time. Accordingly, conventional analyte sensors, which reside in the very poorly vascularized adipose tissue beneath the dermis, result in a significantly greater diffusion distance from the vasculature in the dermis and thus a substantial diffusional latency (e.g., typically 5-20 minutes). In contrast, the shallower microneedle insertion depth of the analyte monitoring device 110 benefits from low diffusional latency from capillaries to the sensor, thereby reducing time delay in analyte detection and providing more accurate results in real-time or near real-time. For example, in some embodiments, diffusional latency may be less than 10 minutes, less than 5 minutes, or less than 3 minutes.
Furthermore, when the microneedle array rests in the upper dermal region, the lower dermis beneath the microneedle array includes very high levels of vascularization and perfusion to support the dermal metabolism, which enables thermoregulation (via vasoconstriction and/or vasodilation) and provides a barrier function to help stabilize the sensing environment around the microneedles. Yet another advantage of the shallower insertion depth is that the upper dermal layers lack pain receptors, thus resulting in a reduced pain sensation when the microneedle array punctures the skin of the user, and providing for a more comfortable, minimally-invasive user experience.
Thus, the analyte monitoring devices and methods described herein enable improved continuous monitoring of one or more target analytes of a user. For example, as described above, the analyte monitoring device may be simple and straightforward to apply, which improves ease-of-use and user compliance. Additionally, analyte measurements of dermal interstitial fluid may provide for highly accurate analyte detection. Furthermore, compared to traditional continuous analyte monitoring devices, insertion of the microneedle array and its sensors may be less invasive and involve less pain for the user. Additional advantages of other aspects of the analyte monitoring devices and methods are further described below.
Housing
As described above, an analyte monitoring device may include a housing. The housing may at least partially surround or enclose other components of the analyte monitoring device (e.g., electronic components), such as for protection of such components. For example, the housing may be configured to help prevent dust and moisture from entering the analyte monitoring device. In some variations, an adhesive layer may attach the housing to a surface (e.g., skin) of a user, while permitting a microneedle array to extend outwardly from the housing and into the skin of the user. Furthermore, in some variations the housing may generally include rounded edges or corners and/or be low-profile so as to be atraumatic and reduce interference with clothing, etc. worn by the user.
For example, as shown in
The housing 310 may, for example, include one or more rigid or semi-rigid protective shell components that may couple together via suitable fasteners (e.g., mechanical fasteners), mechanically interlocking or mating features, and/or an engineering fit. For example, as shown in
Furthermore, the analyte monitoring device 300 may include an adhesive layer 340 configured to attach the housing 310 to a surface (e.g., skin) of a user. The adhesive layer 340 may, for example, be attached to a skin-facing side of the housing 310 via a double-sided adhesive liner 344 as shown in in the variation depicted in
The adhesive layer 340 may, in some variations, have a perimeter that extends farther than the perimeter or periphery of the housing 310 (e.g., which may increase surface area for attachment and increase stability of retention, or the attachment to the skin of a user). Furthermore, in some variations, the adhesive layer 340 may include an opening 342 that permits passage of the outwardly extending microneedle array 330. The opening 342 may closely circumscribe the shape of the microneedle array 330 as shown in
Although the housing 310 depicted in
Similar to the housing 310, the housing 410 may include an internal volume configured to at least partially surround other components of the analyte monitoring device 400. For example, as shown in the cross-sectional view of
User Interface
In some variations, an analyte monitoring system may provide user status, analyte monitoring device status, and/or other suitable information directly via a user interface (e.g., display, indicator lights, etc. as described below) on the analyte monitoring device. Thus, in contrast to analyte monitoring systems that may solely communicate information to a separate peripheral device (e.g., mobile phone, etc.) that in turn communicates the information to a user, in some variations such information may be directly provided by the analyte monitoring device. Advantageously, in some variations, such a user interface on the analyte monitoring device may reduce the need for a user to constantly maintain a separate peripheral device in order to monitor user status and/or analyte monitoring device status (which may be impractical due to cost, inconvenience, etc.). Additionally, the user interface on the analyte monitoring device may reduce risks associated with loss of communication between the analyte monitoring device and a separate peripheral device, such as a user having an inaccurate understanding of their current analyte levels (e.g., leading the user to assume their analyte levels are high when they are actually low, which could, for example, result in the user self-administering an inaccurate dose of drug or withholding a therapeutic intervention when it is medically necessary).
Additionally, the ability to communicate information to a user via the analyte monitoring device itself, independently of a separate peripheral device, may reduce or eliminate the need to maintain compatibility between the analyte monitoring device and separate peripheral devices as such peripheral devices are upgraded (e.g., replaced with new device models or other hardware, run new versions of operating systems or other software, etc.).
Accordingly, in some variations, the housing may include a user interface, such as an interface to provide information in a visual, audible, and/or tactile manner to provide information regarding user status and/or status of the analyte monitoring device, and/or other suitable information. Examples of user status that may be communicated via the user interface include information representative of analyte measurement in the user (e.g., below a predetermined target analyte measurement threshold or range, within a predetermined target analyte measurement range, above a predetermined target analyte measurement threshold or range, increase or decrease of analyte measurement over time, rate of change of analyte measurement, other information relating to trend of analyte measurements, other suitable alerts associated with analyte measurement, etc.). Examples of analyte monitoring device status that may be communicated via the user interface include device operation mode (e.g., associated with device warm-up state, analyte monitoring state, battery power status such as low battery, etc.), a device error state (e.g., operational error, pressure-induced sensing attenuation, fault, failure mode, etc.), device power status, device life status (e.g., anticipated sensor end-of-life), status of connectivity between device and a mobile computing device, and/or the like.
In some variations, the user interface may by default be in an enabled or “on” state to communicate such information at least whenever the analyte monitoring device is performing analyte measurements) or whenever the analyte monitoring device is powered on, thereby helping to ensure that information is continuously available to the user. For example, user interface elements may communicate through a display or indicator light(s) (e.g., as described below) not only alerts to flag user attention or recommend remedial action, but also when user status and/or device status are normal. Accordingly, in some variations, a user is not required to perform an action to initiate a scan to learn their current analyte measurement level(s), and such information may always readily be available to the user. In some variations, however, a user may perform an action to disable the user interface temporarily (e.g., similar to a “snooze” button) such as for a predetermined amount of time (e.g., 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, etc.) after which the user interface is automatically reenabled, or until a second action is performed to reenable the user interface.
In some variations, the user interface of the housing may include a display configured to visually communicate information. The display may, for example, include a display screen (e.g., LCD screen, OLED display, electrophoretic display, electrochromic display, etc.) configured to display alphanumeric text (e.g., numbers, letters, etc.), symbols, and/or suitable graphics to communicate information to the user. For example, the display screen may include a numerical information, textual information, and/or a graphics (e.g., sloped line, arrows, etc.) of information such as user status and/or status of the analyte monitoring device. For example, the display screen may include text or graphical representations of analyte measurement levels, trends, and/or recommendations (e.g., physical activity, reduced dietary intake, etc.).
As another example, the display on the housing may include one or more indicator lights (e.g., including LEDs, OLEDs, lasers, electroluminescent material, or other suitable light source, waveguides, etc.) that may be controlled in one or more predetermined illumination modes to communicate different statuses and/or other suitable information. An indicator light may be controlled to illuminate with multiple colors (e.g., red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and/or purple, etc.) or in only one color. For example, an indicator light may include a multi-colored LED. As another example, an indicator light may include a transparent or semi-transparent material (e.g., acrylic) positioned over one or more different-colored light sources (e.g., LED) such that different-colored light sources may be selectively activated to illuminate the indicator light in a selected color. The activation of light sources can either occur simultaneously or in sequence. An indicator light may have any suitable form (e.g., raised, flush, recessed, etc. from housing body) and/or shape (e.g., circle or other polygon, ring, elongated strip, etc.). In some variations, an indicator light may have a pinhole size and/or shape to present the same intensity of the light as a larger light source, but with significantly less power requirements, which may help conserve onboard power in the analyte monitoring device.
Indicator light(s) on the display may be illuminated in one or more various manners to communicate different kinds of information. For example, an indicator light may be selectively illuminated on or off to communicate information (e.g., illumination “on” indicates one status, while illumination “off” indicates another status). Additionally or alternatively, an indicator light may be illuminated in a selected color or intensity to communicate information (e.g., illumination in a first color or intensity indicates a first status, while illumination in a second color or intensity indicates a second status). Additionally or alternatively, an indicator light may be illuminated in a selected temporal pattern to communicate information (e.g., illumination in a first temporal pattern indicates a first status, while illumination in a second temporal pattern indicates a second status). For example, an indicator light may be selectively illuminated in one of a plurality of predetermined temporal patterns that differ in illumination frequency (e.g., repeated illumination at a rapid or slow frequency), regularity (e.g., periodic repeated illumination vs. intermittent illumination), duration of illumination “on” time, duration of illumination “off” time, rate of change in illumination intensity, duty cycle (e.g., ratio of illumination “on” time to illumination “off” time), and/or the like, where each predetermined temporal pattern may indicate a respective status.
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations, a display may include multiple indicator lights that may be collectively illuminated in one or more predetermined illumination modes or sequences in accordance with one or more predetermined spatial and/or temporal patterns. For example, in some variations, some or all of the indicator lights arranged on a display may be illuminated in synchrony or in sequence to indicate a particular status. Accordingly, the selected subset of indicator lights (e.g., the spatial arrangement of the indicator lights that are illuminated) and/or the manner in which they are illuminated (e.g., illumination order, illumination rate, etc.) may indicate a particular status. Additionally or alternatively, a plurality of indicator lights may illuminate simultaneously or in sequence to increase the diversity of the color palette. For example, in some variations, red, green, and blue LEDs may be illuminated in rapid succession to create the impression of white light to a user.
It should furthermore be understood that one or more of the above-described illumination modes may be combined in any suitable manner (e.g., combination of varying color, intensity, brightness, luminosity, contrast, timing, location, etc.) to communicate information. Additionally or alternatively, an ambient light sensor may be incorporated into the device body to enable dynamic adjustment light levels in the indicator light(s) to compensate for environmental light conditions to help conserve power. The ambient light sensor may, in some variations, be used in conjunction with a kinetic sensor (e.g., as described in further detail below) to further determine appropriate periods for the analyte monitoring device to enter into a power saving mode or reduced power state. For example, detection of darkness and no motion of the analyte monitoring device may indicate that the wearer of the analyte monitoring device is asleep, which may trigger the analyte monitoring device to enter into a power saving mode or reduced power state.
Furthermore, in some variations, an indicator light may include an icon (e.g., symbol) that may be indicative of analyte information (e.g., up arrow to indicate rising analyte measurement level trend, down arrow to indicate falling analyte measurement level trend), analyte monitoring device status (e.g., exclamation point to indicate a device error state), and/or other suitable information. Additionally or alternatively, iconography in the indicator light(s) may be used to communicate recommendations for the user such as behavioral recommendations. Iconography may, for example, have the advantage of communicating recommendations to a user in a more universal or language-agnostic manner (e.g., without the need for language translations to tailor the device to different geographical regions or user preferences, etc.). For example, as shown in
In the variations shown in
Microneedle Array
As shown in the schematic of
The microneedle array 500 may be at least partially formed from a semiconductor (e.g., silicon) substrate and include various material layers applied and shaped using various suitable microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) manufacturing techniques (e.g., deposition and etching techniques), as further described below. The microneedle array may be reflow-soldered to a circuit board, similar to a typical integrated circuit. Furthermore, in some variations the microneedle array 500 may include a three electrode setup including a working (sensing) electrode having an electrochemical sensing coating (including a biorecognition element such as an enzyme) that enables detection of a target analyte, a reference electrode, and a counter electrode. In other words, the microneedle array 500 may include at least one microneedle 510 that includes a working electrode, at least one microneedle 510 including a reference electrode, and at least one microneedle 510 including a counter electrode. Additional details of these types of electrodes are described in further detail below.
In some variations, the microneedle array 500 may include a plurality of microneedles that are insulated such that the electrode on each microneedle in the plurality of microneedles is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other electrode on the microneedle array. The resulting individual addressability of the microneedle array 500 may enable greater control over each electrode's function, since each electrode may be separately probed. For example, the microneedle array 500 may be used to provide multiple independent measurements of a given target analyte, which improves the device's sensing reliability and accuracy. Furthermore, in some variations the electrodes of multiple microneedles may be electrically connected to produce augmented signal levels. As another example, the same microneedle array 500 may additionally or alternatively be interrogated to simultaneously measure multiple analytes to provide a more comprehensive assessment of physiological status. For example, as shown in the schematic of
In some variations of microneedles (e.g., microneedles with a working electrode), the electrode 520 may be located proximal to the insulated distal apex 516 of the microneedle. In other words, in some variations the electrode 520 does not cover the apex of the microneedle. Rather, the electrode 520 may be offset from the apex or tip of the microneedle. The electrode 520 being proximal to or offset from the insulated distal apex 516 of the microneedle advantageously provides more accurate sensor measurements. For example, this arrangement prevents concentration of the electric field at the microneedle apex 516 during manufacturing, thereby avoiding non-uniform electro-deposition of sensing chemistry on the electrode surface 520 that would result in faulty sensing.
As another example, placing the electrode 520 offset from the microneedle apex further improves sensing accuracy by reducing undesirable signal artefacts and/or erroneous sensor readings caused by stress upon microneedle insertion. The distal apex of the microneedle is the first region to penetrate into the skin, and thus experiences the most stress caused by the mechanical shear phenomena accompanying the tearing or cutting of the skin. If the electrode 520 were placed on the apex or tip of the microneedle, this mechanical stress may delaminate the electrochemical sensing coating on the electrode surface when the microneedle is inserted, and/or cause a small yet interfering amount of tissue to be transported onto the active sensing portion of the electrode. Thus, placing the electrode 520 sufficiently offset from the microneedle apex may improve sensing accuracy. For example, in some variations, a distal edge of the electrode 520 may be located at least about 10 μm (e.g., between about 20 μm and about 30 μm) from the distal apex or tip of the microneedle, as measured along a longitudinal axis of the microneedle.
The body portion 512 of the microneedle 510 may further include an electrically conductive pathway extending between the electrode 520 and a backside electrode or other electrical contact (e.g., arranged on a backside of the substrate of the microneedle array). The backside electrode may be soldered to a circuit board, enabling electrical communication with the electrode 520 via the conductive pathway. For example, during use, the in-vivo sensing current (inside the dermis) measured at a working electrode is interrogated by the backside electrical contact, and the electrical connection between the backside electrical contact and the working electrode is facilitated by the conductive pathway. In some variations, this conductive pathway may be facilitated by a metal via running through the interior of the microneedle body portion (e.g., shaft) between the microneedle's proximal and distal ends. Alternatively, in some variations the conductive pathway may be provided by the entire body portion being formed of a conductive material (e.g., doped silicon). In some of these variations, the complete substrate on which the microneedle array 500 is built upon may be electrically conductive, and each microneedle 510 in the microneedle array 500 may be electrically isolated from adjacent microneedles 510 as described below. For example, in some variations, each microneedle 510 in the microneedle array 500 may be electrically isolated from adjacent microneedles 510 with an insulative barrier including electrically insulative material (e.g., dielectric material such as silicon dioxide) that surrounds the conductive pathway extending between the electrode 520 and backside electrical contact. For example, body portion 512 may include an insulative material that forms a sheath around the conductive pathway, thereby preventing electrical communication between the conductive pathway and the substrate. Other example variations of structures enabling electrical isolation among microneedles are described in further detail below.
Such electrical isolation among microneedles in the microneedle array permits the sensors to be individually addressable. This individually addressability advantageously enables independent and parallelized measurement among the sensors, as well as dynamic reconfiguration of sensor assignment (e.g., to different analytes). In some variations, the electrodes in the microneedle array can be configured to provide redundant analyte measurements, which is an advantage over conventional analyte monitoring devices. For example, redundancy can improve performance by improving accuracy (e.g., averaging multiple analyte measurement values for the same analyte which reduces the effect of extreme high or low sensor signals on the determination of analyte levels) and/or improving reliability of the device by reducing the likelihood of total failure.
In some variations, as described in further detail below with respective different variations of the microneedle, the microneedle array may be formed at least in part with suitable semiconductor and/or MEMS fabrication techniques and/or mechanical cutting or dicing. Such processes may, for example, be advantageous for enabling large-scale, cost-efficient manufacturing of microneedle arrays. For example, in some variations, the microneedle array may be formed at least in part using techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/913,709, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Microneedle Structures
Described herein are multiple example variations of microneedle structure incorporating one or more of the above-described microneedle features for a microneedle array in an analyte monitoring device.
In some variations, a microneedle may have a generally columnar body portion and a tapered distal portion with an electrode. For example,
The microneedle 700 may be formed at least in part by suitable MEMS fabrication techniques such as plasma etching, also called dry etching. For example, in some variations, the insulating moat 713 around the body portion 712 of the microneedle may be made by first forming a trench in a silicon substrate by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) from the backside of the substrate, then filling that trench with a sandwich structure of SiO2/polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si)/SiO2 by low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) or other suitable process. In other words, the insulating moat 713 may passivate the surface of the body portion 712 of the microneedle, and continue as a buried feature in the substrate 702 near the proximal portion of the microneedle. By including largely compounds of silicon, the insulating moat 713 may provide good fill and adhesion to the adjoining silicon walls (e.g., of the conductive core 740, substrate 702, etc.). The sandwich structure of the insulating moat 713 may further help provide excellent matching of coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) with the adjacent silicon, thereby advantageously reducing faults, cracks, and/or other thermally-induced weaknesses in the insulating structure 713.
The tapered distal portion may be fashioned out by an isotropic dry etch from the frontside of the substrate, and the body portion 712 of the microneedle 700 may be formed from DRIE. The frontside metal electrode 720 may be deposited and patterned on the distal portion by specialized lithography (e.g., electron-beam evaporation) that permits metal deposition in the desired annular region for the electrode 720 without coating the distal apex 716. Furthermore, the backside electrical contact 730 of Ni/Au may be deposited by suitable MEMS manufacturing techniques (e.g., sputtering).
The microneedle 700 may have any suitable dimensions. By way of illustration, the microneedle 700 may, in some variations, have a height of between about 300 μm and about 500 μm. In some variations, the tapered distal portion 714 may have a tip angle between about 60 degrees and about 80 degrees, and an apex diameter of between about 1 μm and about 15 μm. In some variations, the surface area of the annular electrode 720 may include between about 9,000 μm2 and about 11,000 μm2, or about 10,000 μm2.
However, compared to the microneedle 700, the microneedle 900 may have a sharper tip at the distal apex 916 and a modified insulating moat 913. For example, the distal apex 916 may have a sharper tip angle, such as between about 25 degrees and about 45 degrees, and an apex radius of less than about 100 nm, which provides a sharper microneedle profile that may penetrate skin with greater ease, lower velocity, less energy, and/or less trauma. Furthermore, in contrast to the insulating moat 713 (which extends through the substrate 702 and along the height of the microneedle body portion 712 as shown in
In some variations, the rest of the microneedle surface 900 (aside from the annular electrode 920) may include an insulating material extending from substrate insulation 904. For example, a layer of an insulating material (e.g., SiO2) may extend from a frontside surface of the substrate 902 to provide a body portion insulation 918, and may further extend up over a proximal edge of the electrode 920 as shown in
The microneedle 900 may have any suitable dimensions. By way of illustration, the microneedle 900 may, in some variations, include a height of between about 400 μm and about 600 μm, or about 500 μm. In some variations, the tapered distal portion 914 may have a tip angle of between about 25 degrees and about 45 degrees, with a tip radius of less than about 100 nm. Furthermore, the microneedle may have a shaft diameter of between about 160 μm and about 200 μm.
However, the electrode 2720 on the microneedle 2700 may include a tip contact trench 2722. This contact trench may be configured to help establish ohmic contact between the electrode 2720 and the underlying conductive core 2740 of the microneedle. In some variations, the shape of the tip contact trench 2722 may include an annular recess formed in the surface of the conductive core 2740 (e.g., into the body portion of the microneedle, or otherwise in contact with a conductive pathway in the body portion) such that when the electrode 2720 material is deposited onto the conductive core 2740, the electrode 2720 with the tip contact trench 2722 may have a stepped profile when viewed from the side. The tip contact trench 2722 may advantageously help provide a margin of error to ensure contact between the electrode 2720 and the underlying conductive core 2740. Any of the other microneedle variations described herein may also have a similar tip contact trench to help ensure contact between the electrode (which may be, for example, a working electrode, reference electrode, counter electrode, etc.) with a conductive pathway within the microneedle.
In some variations, a microneedle may have a generally pyramidal body portion and a tapered distal portion with an electrode. For example,
As shown in
The microneedle 1100 may be formed at least in part by suitable MEMS fabrication techniques. For example, the microneedle pyramidal structure may be formed by a timed anisotropic wet etch of a silicon wafer substrate. To form the annular electrode surface, metal deposition on the tapered distal portion of the microneedle may be performed, such as using specialized lithographic techniques as described above with respect to electrode 720, without coating the distal apex 1116. However, compared to the process described above to form microneedle 700, much of the process to form microneedle 1100 does not involve expensive RIE techniques, which may thereby substantially reduce manufacturing costs. Furthermore, in some variations, instead of utilizing dry etch processes as described above with respect to microneedle 700, a process of forming the microneedle 1100 may include mechanical dicing, bulk micromachining, or other cutting techniques to shape the microneedle 1100 into having a pyramidal body. Furthermore, such techniques may be performed at a large scale, so as to form, for example, multiple microneedles 1110 arranged in an array as shown in
The microneedle 1100 may have any suitable dimensions. By way of illustration, the microneedle 1100 may, in some variations, have a height of between about 400 μm and about 600 μm, or about 500 μm. In some variations, the tapered distal portion 714 may have a tip angle between about 30 degrees and about 50 degrees, or about 40 degrees, which may provide a good balance between sharpness for skin penetration and lithography processability on the sloped surface on which the electrode 1120 is to be disposed.
In some variations, a pyramidal microneedle may be similar to that described above with respect to
Additionally or alternatively, as shown in
Like the pyramidal microneedle 1100 described above with respect to
In some variations, a microneedle may be similar to those described above, except that the microneedle may include a columnar body portion and a pyramidal distal portion. For example, as shown in
In some variations, the tapered distal portion 1414 may be similar to that described above with respect to
The combination of columnar and pyramidal aspects of the microneedle 1400 has a number of advantages. Similar to that described above, the tapered distal portion 1414 and apex 1416 have high mechanical strength due to the <311> wet etched planes and the pyramidal shape. Additionally, because the substrate is formed from a non-conductive material, an insulation “moat” as described above may not be required to electrically isolate the microneedle, thereby simplifying and reducing cost of fabrication. The absence of the insulation moat also permits material continuity in the substrate, which may lead to better mechanical integrity of the overall microneedle array structure.
Although the columnar-pyramidal microneedle 1400 is described above as including a non-conductive substrate, it should be understood alternatively, in some variations a columnar-pyramidal microneedle may include a conductive core extending from a conductive substrate (e.g., doped silicon). For example, in some variations the columnar body portion 1412 may be similar to that described above with respect to
In some variations of microneedle arrays including one or more microneedles 1400, conductive pathways may be formed in the non-conductive substrate to facilitate communication with the electrode(s) 1420. For example, as described above, the body portion 1412 of each microneedle may include a conductive core including a conductive material. Such conductive material may extend between the electrode 1420 to the substrate 1402. As shown in
Additional details of example variations of microneedle array configurations are described in further detail below.
Electrodes
As described above, each microneedle in the microneedle array may include an electrode. In some variations, multiple distinct types of electrodes may be included among the microneedles in the microneedle array. For example, in some variations the microneedle array may function as an electrochemical cell operable in an electrolytic manner with three types of electrodes. In other words, the microneedle array may include at least one working electrode, at least one counter electrode, and at least one reference electrode. Thus, the microneedle array may include three distinct electrode types, though one or more of each electrode type may form a complete system (e.g., the system might include multiple distinct working electrodes). Furthermore, multiple distinct microneedles may be electrically joined to form an effective electrode type (e.g., a single working electrode may be formed from two or more connected microneedles with working electrode sites). Each of these electrode types may include a metallization layer and may include one or more coatings or layers over the metallization layer that help facilitate the function of that electrode.
Generally, the working electrode is the electrode at which oxidation and/or reduction reaction of interest occurs for detection of an analyte of interest. The counter electrode functions to source (provide) or sink (accumulate) the electrons, via an electrical current, that are required to sustain the electrochemical reaction at the working electrode. The reference electrode functions to provide a reference potential for the system; that is, the electrical potential at which the working electrode is biased is referenced to the reference electrode. A fixed, time-varying, or at least controlled potential relationship is established between the working and reference electrodes, and within practical limits no current is sourced from or sinked to the reference electrode. Additionally, to implement such a three-electrode system, the analyte monitoring device may include a suitable potentiostat or electrochemical analog front end to maintain a fixed potential relationship between the working electrode and reference electrode contingents within the electrochemical system (via an electronic feedback mechanism), while permitting the counter electrode to dynamically swing to potentials required to sustain the redox reaction of interest.
Working Electrode
As described above, the working electrode is the electrode at which the oxidation and/or reduction reaction of interest occurs. In some variations, sensing may be performed at the interface of the working electrode and interstitial fluid located within the body (e.g., on an outer surface of the overall microneedle). In some variations, a working electrode may include an electrode material and a biorecognition layer in which a biorecognition element (e.g., enzyme) is immobilized on the working electrode to facilitate selective analyte quantification. In some variations, the biorecognition layer may also function as an interference-blocking layer and may help prevent endogenous and/or exogenous species from directly oxidizing (or reducing) at the electrode.
A redox current detected at the working electrode may be correlated to a detected concentration of an analyte of interest. This is because assuming a steady-state, diffusion-limited system, the redox current detected at the working electrode follows the Cottrell relation below:
where n is the stoichiometric number of electrons mitigating a redox reaction, F is Faraday's constant, A is electrode surface area, D is the diffusion coefficient of the analyte of interest, C is the concentration of the analyte of interest, and t is the duration of time that the system is biased with an electrical potential. Thus, the detected current at the working electrode scales linearly with the analyte concentration.
Moreover, because the detected current is a direct function of electrode surface area A, the surface area of the electrode may be increased to enhance the sensitivity (e.g., amperes per molar of analyte) of the sensor. For example, multiple singular working electrodes may be grouped into arrays of two or more constituents to increase total effective sensing surface area. Additionally or alternatively, to obtain redundancy, multiple working electrodes may be operated as parallelized sensors to obtain a plurality of independent measures of the concentration of an analyte of interest. The working electrode can either be operated as the anode (such that an analyte is oxidized at its surface), or as the cathode (such that an analyte is reduced at its surface).
In some variations, the electrode material 1612 may be coated with a highly porous electrocatalytic layer, such as a platinum black layer 1613, which may augment the electrode surface area for enhanced sensitivity. Additionally or alternatively, the platinum black layer 1613 may enable the electrocatalytic oxidation or reduction of the product of the biorecognition reaction facilitated by the biorecognition layer 1614. However, in some variations the platinum black layer 1613 may be omitted (as shown in
The biorecognition layer 1614 may be arranged over the electrode material 1612 (or platinum black layer 1613 if it is present) and functions to immobilize and stabilize the biorecognition element which facilitates selective analyte quantification for extended time periods. In some variations, the biorecognition element may include an enzyme, such as an oxidase. As an exemplary variation for use in a glucose monitoring system, the biorecognition element may include glucose oxidase, which converts glucose, in the presence of oxygen, to an electroactive product (i.e., hydrogen peroxide) that can be detected at the electrode surface. Specifically, the redox equation associated with this exemplary variation is Glucose+Oxygen→Hydrogen Peroxide+Gluconolactone (mediated by glucose oxidase); Hydrogen Peroxide→Water+Oxygen (mediated by applying an oxidizing potential at the working electrode).
However, in other variations the biorecognition element may additionally or alternatively comprise another suitable oxidase or oxidoreductase enzyme such as lactate oxidase, alcohol oxidase, beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, tyrosinase, catalase, ascorbate oxidase, cholesterol oxidase, choline oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, urate oxidase, urease, and/or xanthine oxidase.
In some variations, the biorecognition element may be cross-linked with an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species that may help stabilize the biorecognition element within the biorecognition layer 1614. As further described below, in some variations, the cross-linking of the biorecognition element may result in the microneedle array being compatible with ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization, which permits exposure of the entire analyte monitoring device (including sensing elements and electronics) to the same sterilization cycle, thereby simplifying the sterilization process and lowering manufacture costs. For example, the biorecognition element may be cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, glyoxal, malonaldehyde, succinaldehyde, and/or other suitable species. In some variations, the biorecognition element may be cross-linked with such an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species to form cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates. Cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates that have at least a threshold molecular weight may then be embedded in a conducting polymer. By embedding only those aggregates that have a threshold molecular weight, any uncross-linked enzymes may be screened out and not incorporated into the biorecogntion layer. Accordingly, only aggregates having a desired molecular weight may be selected for use in the conducting polymer, to help ensure that only sufficiently stabilized, cross-linked enzyme entities are included in the biorecognition layer, thereby contributing to a biorecognition layer that is overall better suited for EO sterilization without loss in sensing performance. In some variations, only cross-linked aggregates that have a molecular weight that is at least twice that of glucose oxidase may be embedded in the conducting polymer.
In some variations, the conducting polymer may be permselective to contribute to the biorecognition layer's robustness against circulating androgynous electroactive species (e.g., ascorbic acid, vitamin C, etc.), fluctuations of which may adversely affect the sensitivity of the sensor. Such a permselective conducting polymer in the biorecognition layer may further be more robust against pharmacological interferences (e.g., acetaminophen) in the interstitial fluid that may affect sensor accuracy. Conducting polymers may be made permselective by, for example, removing excess charge carriers by an oxidative electropolymerization process or by neutralizing these charge carriers with a counter-ion dopant, thereby transforming the conducting polymer into a non-conducting form. These oxidatively-polymerized conducting polymers exhibit permselectivity and are hence able to reject ions of similar charge polarity to the dopant ion (net positive or negative) or by via size exclusion due to the dense and compact form of the conducting polymers.
Furthermore, in some variations the conducting polymer may exhibit self-sealing and/or self-healing properties. For example, the conducting polymer may undergo oxidative electropolymerization, during which the conducting polymer may lose its conductivity as the thickness of the deposited conducting polymer on the electrode increases, until the lack of sufficient conductivity causes the deposition of additional conducting polymer to diminish. In the event that the conducting polymer has succumbed to minor physical damage (e.g., during use), the polymeric backbone may re-assemble to neutralize free charge and thereby lower overall surface energy of the molecular structure, which may manifest as self-sealing and/or self-healing properties.
In some variations, the working electrode may further include a diffusion-limiting layer 1615 arranged over the biorecognition layer 1614. The diffusion-limiting layer 1615 may function to limit the flux of the analyte of interest in order to reduce the sensitivity of the sensor to endogenous oxygen fluctuations. For example, the diffusion-limiting layer 1615 may attenuate the concentration of the analyte of interest so that it becomes the limiting reactant to an aerobic enzyme. However, in some variation (e.g., if the biorecognition element is not aerobic), the diffusion-limiting layer 1615 may be omitted.
The working electrode may further include, in some variations, a hydrophilic layer 1616 that provides for a biocompatible interface to, for example, reduce the foreign body response. However, in some variations the hydrophilic layer 1616 may be omitted (e.g., if the diffusion-limiting layer expresses hydrophilic moieties to serve this purpose), as shown in
Counter Electrode
As described above, the counter electrode is the electrode that is sourcing or sinking electrons (via an electrical current) required to sustain the electrochemical reaction at the working electrode. The number of counter electrode constituents can be augmented in the form of a counter electrode array to enhance surface area such that the current-carrying capacity of the counter electrode does not limit the redox reaction of the working electrode. It thus may be desirable to have an excess of counter electrode area versus the working electrode area to circumvent the current-carrying capacity limitation. If the working electrode is operated as an anode, the counter electrode will serve as the cathode and vice versa. Similarly, if an oxidation reaction occurs at the working electrode, a reduction reaction occurs at the counter electrode and vice versa. Unlike the working or reference electrodes, the counter electrode is permitted to dynamically swing to electrical potentials required to sustain the redox reaction of interest on the working electrode.
As shown in
In some variations, the counter electrode 1620 may have few or no additional layers over the electrode material 1632. However, in some variations the counter electrode 1620 may benefit from increase surface area to increase the amount of current it can support. For example, the counter electrode material 1632 may be textured or otherwise roughened in such a way to augment the surface area of the electrode material 1632 for enhanced current sourcing or sinking ability. Additionally or alternatively, the counter electrode 1620 may include a layer of platinum black 1624, which may augment electrode surface as described above with respect to some variations of the working electrode. However, in some variations of the counter electrode, the layer of platinum black may be omitted (e.g., as shown in
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations as shown in
Reference Electrode
As described above, the reference electrode functions to provide a reference potential for the system; that is, the electrical potential at which the working electrode is biased is referenced to the reference electrode. A fixed or at least controlled potential relationship may be established between the working and reference electrodes, and within practical limits no current is sourced from or sinked to the reference electrode.
As shown in
The reference electrode 1630 may, in some variations, further include a redox-couple layer 1636, which main contain a surface-immobilized, solid-state redox couple with a stable thermodynamic potential. For example, the reference electrode may operate at a stable standard thermodynamic potential with respect to a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The high stability of the electrode potential may be attained by employing a redox system with constant (e.g., buffered or saturated) concentrations of each participant of the redox reaction. For example, the reference electrode may include saturated Ag/AgCl (E=+0.197V vs. SHE) or IrOx (E=+0.177 vs. SHE, pH=7.00) in the redox-couple layer 1636. Other examples of redox-couple layers 1636 may include a suitable conducting polymer with a dopant molecule such as that described in U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2019/0309433, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by this reference. In some variations, the reference electrode may be used as a half-cell to construct a complete electrochemical cell.
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations as shown in
Exemplary Electrode Layer Formation
Various layers of the working electrode, counter electrode, and reference electrode may be applied to the microneedle array and/or functionalized, etc. using suitable processes such as those described below.
In a pre-processing step for the microneedle array, the microneedle array may be plasma cleaned in an inert gas (e.g., RF-generated inert gas such as argon) plasma environment to render the surface of the material, including the electrode material (e.g., electrode material 1612, 1622, and 1632 as described above), to be more hydrophilic and chemically reactive. This pre-processing functions to not only physically remove organic debris and contaminants, but also to clean and prepare the electrode surface to enhance adhesion of subsequently deposited films on its surface.
Working Electrode
Anodization: To configure the working electrode after the pre-processing step, the electrode material 1612 may undergo an anodization treatment using an amperometry approach in which the electrode constituent(s) assigned for the working electrode function is (are) subject to a fixed high anodic potential (e.g., between +1.0-+1.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) for a suitable amount of time (e.g., between about 30 sec and about 10 min) in a moderate-strength acid solution (e.g., 0.1-3M H2SO4). In this process, a thin, yet stable native oxide layer may be generated on the electrode surface. Owing to the low pH arising at the electrode surface, any trace contaminants may be removed as well.
In an alternative embodiment using a coulometry approach, anodization can proceed until a specified amount of charge has passed (measured in Coulombs). The anodic potential may be applied as described above; however, the duration of this might vary until the specified amount of charge has passed.
Activation: Following the anodization process, the working electrode constituents may be subjected to a cyclically-scanned potential waveform in an activation process using cyclic voltammetry. In the activation process, which may occur in a moderate-strength acid solution (e.g. 0.1-3M H2SO4), the potential applied may time-varying in a suitable function (e.g., sawtooth function). For example, the voltage may be linearly scanned between a cathodic value (e.g., between −0.3-−0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) and an anodic value (e.g., between +1.0-+1.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) in an alternating function (e.g., 15-50 linear sweep segments). The scan rate of this waveform can take on a value between 1-1000 mV/sec. It should be noted that a current peak arising during the anodic sweep (sweep to positive extreme) corresponds to the oxidation of a chemical species, while the current peak arising during the ensuing cathodic sweep (sweep to negative extreme) corresponds to the reduction of said chemical species.
Functionalization of the biorecognition layer: Following the activation process, the working electrode constituents may be functionalized with the biorecognition layer 1614 such as that described above. Assuming that the working electrode contingent of the microneedle array has undergone the aforementioned steps, the potential applied may be time-varying in a sawtooth function. For example, a voltage may be linearly scanned between a cathodic value (e.g., between 0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) and an anodic value (e.g., between +1.0 V vs Ag/AgCl reference electrode) in an alternating function (e.g., 10 linear sweep segments). In an example variation, the scan rate of this waveform can take on a value between about 1 mV/sec and about 10 mV/sec in an aqueous solution comprised of a monomeric precursor to the entrapment conducting polymer and a cross-linked biorecognition element (e.g., enzyme, such as glucose oxidase). In this process, a thin film (e.g., between about 10 nm and about 1000 nm) of biorecognition layer comprising of polymer with a dispersed cross-linked biorecognition element may be generated (e.g., electrodeposited or electropolymerized) on the working electrode surface. In some variations, the conducting polymer may include one or more of aniline, pyrrole, acetylene, phenylene, phenylene vinylene, phenylene diamine, thiophene, 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene, and aminophenylboronic acid. The biorecognition layer imparts a selective sensing capability towards an analyte of interest, as described above.
In some variations, the working electrode surface may be electrochemically roughened in order to enhance adhesion of the biorecognition layer to the electrode material 1612 surface (and/or Pt black layer). The roughening process may involve a cathodization treatment (e.g., cathodic deposition, a subset of amperometry) wherein the electrode is subject to a fixed cathodic potential (e.g., between −0.4-+0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) for a certain amount of time (e.g., 5 sec-10 min) in an acid solution containing the desired metal cation dissolved therein (e.g., 0.01-100 mM H2PtCl6). Alternatively, the electrode is subject to a fixed cathodic potential (e.g., between about −0.4 to about +0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) until a certain amount of charge has passed (e.g., 0.1 mC-100 mC) in an acid solution containing the desired metal cation dissolved therein (e.g., 0.01-100 mM H2PtCl6). In this process, a thin, yet highly porous layer of the metal may be generated on the electrode surface, thereby augmenting the electrode surface area dramatically. Additionally or alternatively, in some variations as described above, elemental platinum metal may deposited on the electrode to form or deposit a platinum black layer 1613.
Functionalization of the diffusion-limiting layer: Following the functionalization of the biorecognition layer, the working electrode constituents may, in some variations, be functionalized with the diffusion-limiting layer. Assuming that the working electrode contingent of the microneedle array has undergone the aforementioned steps, one or more of the following methods may be employed to apply the diffusion-limiting layer, which may be a thin film of thickness between about 100 nm to about 10,000 nm.
In some variations, a diffusion-limiting layer may applied by a spray coating method in which an aerosolized polymer formulation (dispersed in water or a solvent) is applied to the microneedle array device with a specified spray pattern and duration in a controlled-environment setting. This creates a thin film with the desired thickness and porosity required to restrict the diffusion of an analyte of interest to the biorecognition layer.
In some variations, a diffusion-limiting layer may be applied by a plasma-induced polymerization method in which a plasma source generates a gas discharge that provides energy to activate a cross-linking reaction within a gaseous, aerosolized, or liquid monomeric precursor (e.g., vinylpyridine). This converts the monomeric precursor to a polymeric coating that may be deposited on the microneedle array to a specified thickness, thereby creating a thin film with the desired thickness and porosity required to restrict the diffusion of an analyte of interest to the biorecognition layer 1614.
Furthermore, in some variations, a diffusion-limiting layer may applied by electrophoretic or dielectrophoretic deposition, such as example techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,092,207, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Counter Electrode
Anodization: In some variations, the counter electrode material may undergo an anodization treatment using an amperometry approach in which the electrode constituent(s) assigned for the counter electrode function is subject to a fixed high anodic potential or a suitable amount of time in a moderate-strength acid solution. Exemplary parameters and other specifics of the anodization process for the counter electrode may be similar to that described above for the working electrode. Similarly, anodization for the counter electrode may alternatively use a coulometry approach as described above.
Activation: In some variations, following the anodization process, the counter electrode constituents may be subjected to a cyclically-scanned potential waveform in an activation process using cyclic voltammetry. In some variations, the activation process may be similar to that described above for the working electrode.
Roughening: Furthermore, in some variations, the counter electrode surface may be electrochemically roughened in order to enhance the current-sinking or current-sourcing capacity of this electrode contingent. The electrochemical roughening process may be similar to that described above for the working electrode. Additionally or alternatively, in some variations as described above, elemental platinum metal may deposited on the electrode to form or deposit a platinum black layer 1623.
Reference Electrode
Anodization: Like the working and counter electrodes as described above, the reference electrode may undergo an anodization treatment using an amperometry approach in which the electrode constituent(s) assigned for the counter electrode function is subject to a fixed high anodic potential or a suitable amount of time in a moderate-strength acid solution. Exemplary parameters and other specifics of the anodization process for the counter electrode may be similar to that described above for the working electrode. Similarly, anodization for the counter electrode may
Activation: Following the anodization process, the reference electrode constituents may be subjected to a cyclically-scanned potential waveform in an activation process using cyclic voltammetry. In some variations, the activation process may be similar to that described above for the working electrode.
Functionalization: Following the activation process, the reference electrode constituents may be functionalized. Assuming that the reference electrode contingent of the microneedle array has undergone the aforementioned steps, a fixed anodic potential (e.g., between +0.4-+1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) may be applied for a certain suitable duration (e.g., between about 10 sec and about 10 min) in an aqueous solution. Alternatively, the reference electrode is subject to a fixed anodic potential (e.g., between about +0.4 to about +1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) until a certain amount of charge has passed (e.g., 0.01 mC-10 mC) in an aqueous solution. In some variations, the aqueous solution may include a monomeric precursor to a conducting polymer and a charged dopant counter ion or material (e.g., poly(styrene sulfonate)) carrying an opposing charge. In this process, a thin film (e.g., between about 10 nm and about 10,000 nm) of a conducting polymer with a dispersed counter ion or material may be generated on the reference electrode surface. This creates a surface-immobilized, solid-state redox couple with a stable thermodynamic potential. In some variations, the conducting polymer may include one or more of aniline, pyrrole, acetylene, phenylene, phenylene vinylene, phenylene diamine, thiophene, 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene, and aminophenylboronic acid.
In some alternative embodiments, a native iridium oxide film (e.g., IrO2 or Ir2O3 or IrO4) may be electrochemically grown on an iridium electrode surface in an oxidative process. This also creates a stable redox couple, as discussed above.
Furthermore, in some variations the reference electrode surface may be electrochemically roughened in order to enhance adhesion of the surface-immobilized redox couple. The electrochemical roughening process may be similar to that described above for the working electrode. Additionally or alternatively, in some variations as described above, elemental platinum metal may deposited on the electrode to form or deposit a platinum black layer 1633.
Other features and techniques for forming the reference electrode may be similar to that described in, for example, U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2019/0309433, which was incorporated above by reference.
Microneedle Array Configurations
Multiple microneedles (e.g., any of the microneedle variations described herein, each of which may have a working electrode, counter electrode, or reference electrode as described above) may be arranged in a microneedle array. Considerations of how to configure the microneedles include factors such as desired insertion force for penetrating skin with the microneedle array, optimization of electrode signal levels and other performance aspects, manufacturing costs and complexity, etc.
For example, the microneedle array may include multiple microneedles that are spaced apart at a predefined pitch (distance between the center of one microneedle to the center of its nearest neighboring microneedle). In some variations, the microneedles may be spaced apart with a sufficient pitch so as to distribute force (e.g., avoid a “bed of nails” effect) that is applied to the skin of the user to cause the microneedle array to penetrate the skin. As pitch increases, force required to insert the microneedle array tends to decrease and depth of penetration tends to increase. However, it has been found that pitch only begins to affect insertion force at low values (e.g., less than about 150 μm). Accordingly, in some variations the microneedles in a microneedle array may have a pitch of at least 200 μm, at least 300 μm, at least 400 μm, at least 500 μm, at least 600 μm, at least 700 μm, or at least 750 μm. For example, the pitch may be between about 200 μm and about 800 μm, between about 300 μm and about 700 μm, or between about 400 μm and about 600 μm. In some variations, the microneedles may be arranged in a periodic grid, and the pitch may be uniform in all directions and across all regions of the microneedle array. Alternatively, the pitch may be different as measured along different axes (e.g., X, Y directions) and/or some regions of the microneedle array may include a smaller pitch while other may include a larger pitch.
Furthermore, for more consistent penetration, microneedles may be spaced equidistant from one another (e.g., same pitch in all directions). To that end, in some variations, the microneedles in a microneedle array may be arranged in a hexagonal configuration as shown in
Another consideration for determining configuration of a microneedle array is overall signal level provided by the microneedles. Generally, signal level at each microneedle is invariant of the total number of microneedle elements in an array. However, signal levels can be enhanced by electrically interconnecting multiple microneedles together in an array. For example, an array with a large number of electrically connected microneedles is expected to produce a greater signal intensity (and hence increased accuracy) than one with fewer microneedles. However, a higher number of microneedles on a die will increase die cost (given a constant pitch) and will also require greater force and/or velocity to insert into skin. In contrast, a lower number of microneedles on a die may reduce die cost and enable insertion into the skin with reduced application force and/or velocity. Furthermore, in some variations a lower number of microneedles on a die may reduce the overall footprint area of the die, which may lead to less unwanted localized edema and/or erythema. Accordingly, in some variations, a balance among these factors may be achieved with a microneedle array including 37 microneedles as shown in
Additionally, as described in further detail below, in some variations only a subset of the microneedles in a microneedle array may be active during operation of the analyte monitoring device. For example, a portion of the microneedles in a microneedle array may be inactive (e.g., no signals read from electrodes of inactive microneedles). In some variations, a portion of the microneedles in a microneedle array may be activated at a certain time during operation and remain active for the remainder of the operating lifetime of the device. Furthermore, in some variations, a portion of the microneedles in a microneedle array may additionally or alternatively be deactivated at a certain time during operation and remain inactive for the remainder of the operating lifetime of the device.
In considering characteristics of a die for a microneedle array, die size is a function of the number of microneedles in the microneedle array and the pitch of the microneedles. Manufacturing costs are also a consideration, as a smaller die size will contribute to lower cost since the number of dies that can be formed from a single wafer of a given area will increase. Furthermore, a smaller die size will also be less susceptible to brittle fracture due to the relative fragility of the substrate.
Furthermore, in some variations, microneedles at the periphery of the microneedle array (e.g., near the edge or boundary of the die, near the edge or boundary of the housing, near the edge or boundary of an adhesive layer on the housing, along the outer border of the microneedle array, etc.) may be found to have better performance (e.g., sensitivity) due to better penetration compared to microneedles in the center of the microneedle array or die. Accordingly, in some variations, working electrodes may be arranged largely or entirely on microneedles located at the periphery of the microneedle array, to obtain more accurate and/or precise analyte measurements.
Furthermore, the microneedle arrays described herein may have a high degree of configurability concerning where the working electrode(s), counter electrode(s), and reference electrode(s) are located within the microneedle array. This configurability may be facilitated by the electronics system.
In some variations, a microneedle array may include electrodes distributed in two or more groups in a symmetrical or non-symmetrical manner in the microneedle array, with each group featuring the same or differing number of electrode constituents depending on requirements for signal sensitivity and/or redundancy. For example, electrodes of the same type (e.g., working electrodes) may be distributed in a bilaterally or radially symmetrical manner in the microneedle array. For example,
As another example,
In some variations, only a portion of microneedle array may include active electrodes. For example,
As another example,
As another example,
While
Warm-Up
Many implanted electrochemical sensors require a “warm-up” time, or time for the sensor to attain a stable signal value following implantation. This process has origins in both physiology and sensor dynamics. However, various aspects of analyte monitoring devices described herein are configured to mitigate factors contributing to warm-up time, thereby allowing the analyte monitoring devices described herein to have significantly shorter warm-up times compared to traditional CGM systems. For example, the analyte monitoring devices described herein may have a warm-up time of about 30 minutes or less (e.g., between about 10 minutes and about 30 minutes, between about 15 minutes and about 30 minutes, between about 20 minutes and about 30 minutes, between about 25 minutes and about 30 minutes), about 45 minutes or less, about 60 minutes or less, about 90 minutes or less, or about 120 minutes or less. In some variations, following a warm-up period, the analyte monitoring device may calibration during a calibration period.
Wound response: For example, the implantation of a sensor creates a wound response due to the localization disruption, displacement, and destruction of tissue. The larger the sensor, or the deeper the implant, the more prolific the wound response. Accordingly, there is a compelling rationale to miniaturize the sensor to elicit an attenuated wound response, which would result in more rapid warm-up.
Protein adsorption: Additionally, following implantation of a sensor, the foreign body response is immediately instigated. The foreign body response includes a complex biochemical cascade that aims to encapsulate the foreign material with cellular matter. Hydrophobic surfaces tend to be subject to adsorption of endogenous proteins very rapidly following implant; this is referred to as biofouling. Hydrophilic surfaces, on the other hand, resist biofouling due to high water content. Human serum albumin (HSA) is the predominant protein in the dermal interstitial fluid, constituting about 60% of total protein, and maintains a negative charge at physiological pH. When the sensor is polarized with a positive potential (as in some variation of the analyte monitoring device), endogenous HSA is subject to electric drift and charge attraction to the positive (working) electrode of the sensor. This can give rise to an increased propensity for the sensor surface to biofoul. This is the rationale behind the implementation of either a hydrophilic diffusion limiting layer or outer biocompatible layer to effectively conceal the sensor from being recognized as a foreign body, as described in further detail above.
As described herein, the analyte monitoring device reduces the influence of the above physiological factors on warm-up time due to, for example, the shallow nature of the implant, the minimal volume of tissue displaced (e.g., up to about two orders of magnitude lower than current CGM systems, such as between about 100 and about 1000 times less tissue displaced, or between about 200 and about 600 times less tissue displaced compared to current CGM systems), the minimal amount of trauma to said tissue during implantation, and the lack of permeation of the vasculature deeper in the reticular dermis, which, when perturbed, can instigate a more prolific wound response that will engender an accelerated effort to encapsulate the implant, as is the case with competing wire-implanted CGM systems.
Attainment of equilibrium: One example of the effect of sensor dynamics on warm-up time relates to the attainment of equilibrium. An electrochemical sensor requires a finite amount of time to achieve equilibrium when used in a new environment. This is typically associated with the establishment of thermodynamic equilibrium due to an adsorbed surface layer of ions at the electrodes. As the reference electrode in most implantable electrochemical sensors does not employ an internal filling solution with a redox couple that is sealed from the rest of the electrochemical cell, this reference electrode must attain equilibrium with its surroundings in order to establish a stable reference potential.
Hydration of sensor layers: The electrode sensor layers must be immersed in an aqueous environment to function properly. The resulting hydration process may activate the electrode's polymer layer(s) and biorecognition element(s) and allows them to rearrange and return to their native active tertiary structure, which is primarily responsible for their activity or unique properties. This process is often known as sensor ‘wetting’ and allows the medium in which the sensing operation occurs to intercalate the sensor layers to a sufficient extent.
Decaying of the non-Faradaic response: The biasing (application of a voltage) of an electrochemical sensor will cause a double layer of ions to form at the electrode surface. This process requires a finite amount of time due to the charging of the adsorbed species on the electrode surface. This gives rise to a double layer capacitance. The non-Faradaic time constant is equal to the product of the said double layer capacitance and the solution resistance. Oftentimes, the non-Faradic response (electrical current) decays to negligible levels more rapidly than other physical phenomena and it is often not the rate-limiting step in the warm-up process. Once the non-Faradaic response decays to negligible levels, the Faradaic response ensues, which is reflective of the electrochemical/redox reaction of interest
As described herein, the analyte monitoring device may reduce the influence of sensor dynamics on warm-up time due to, for example, the implementation thin membrane layers (on the order of 10 nm-5000 nm), which allow the layers to hydrate more rapidly than competing implantable CGM systems. Moreover and owing to the diminutive dimensions of the electrodes described herein (e.g., geometric surface area of the working electrode(s)), the non-Faradaic response transpires for shorter durations (due to reduced double layer capacitance and hence charging of the double layer). In some variations, a high-potential (e.g., >0.75V) bias for a limited period of time following application of the device to skin may further expedite burn-in or warm-up of the sensor to achieve equilibrium and stable signal levels.
Signal Latency
Typically, implanted electrochemical sensors also experience a delay, or signal latency, in attaining a stable signal value following changes in analyte levels. This signal latency is a function of various factors. At a high level, latency is a function of 3 distinct effects: (1) diffusional lag (amount of time that is required for a molecule of analyte to diffuse from the capillary (source) to the sensor surface, (2) diffusional limitation imposed by the sensor membrane/layer architecture on the sensors, and (3) algorithmic processing of data (averaging, filtering, signal denoising, and other signal processing measures), which often results in a group delay. However, various aspects of the analyte monitoring devices described herein minimize these factors contributing to signal latency, thereby resulting in a faster response time for analyte measurements.
As described above, one significant advantage of the analyte monitoring devices described herein is that location of sensor placement. Because the electrode surface is implanted at a location in such close proximity (e.g., within a few hundred micrometers or less) to the dense and well-perfused capillary bed of the reticular dermis, the diffusional lag is negligible. This is a significant advantage over conventional analyte sensors, which reside in the very poorly vascularized adipose tissue beneath the dermis and hence the diffusion distance, and resulting diffusional latency, from the vasculature in the dermis is substantial (e.g., typically 5-20 minutes).
Additionally, as the films deposited on the electrode sensor surface use electrodeposition methods, the precise thickness of said films can be controlled to a highly precise degree. For example, the electrodeposition methods of forming the sensor surface enable consistent, controlled creation of thin film layers that may reduce diffusional lag. Moreover, the spatial localization of the thin film layers to the sensing electrode allows the realization of thinner and less diffusionally resistive films, which further reduce latency due to diffusion of the analyte from the other film surface to the biorecognition layer.
Furthermore, the high level of redundancy (parallel channels of analyte measurement) afforded by the microneedle array allows for higher fidelity measurement and less reliance on the algorithm to interpolate sensor readings, which imparts greater reduced delay or latency.
Electronics System
As shown in the schematic of
PCBs
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include one or more PCBs. For example, the analyte monitoring device may include at least one PCB in the sensor assembly 320 that includes the microneedle array, and at least one device PCB 350 as shown in
For example, as shown in
As shown in
The sensor standoff PCB 322 may be secured to the housing 310 and/or secured within the stack up inside the housing, such as with suitable fasteners or the like. For example, as shown in
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations at least one of the PCBs in the sensor assembly 320 may include or be coupled to one or more additional sensors in combination with the microneedle array 330. For example, the sensor assembly 320 may include a temperature sensor (e.g., thermistor, resistance temperature detector, thermocouple, bandgap reference, non-contact temperature sensor, etc.). In some variations, temperature measurement may additionally or alternatively be performed by one or more analyte-insensitive electrodes in the microneedle array.
In some variations, the sensor standoff PCB 322 may be between about 0.05 inches and about 0.15 inches, or between about 0.093 inches and about 0.127 inches in thickness. The sensor standoff PCB 322, in some variations, may include one or a plurality of conductive through-substrate vias configured to route electrical signals from an anterior surface of the PCB to a posterior surface of the PCB. In some variations, the sensor standoff PCB 322 may comprise a semiconductor (e.g., silicon) with conductive through-substrate vias configured to route electrical signals from an anterior surface of the semiconductor to a posterior surface of the semiconductor. In yet other variations, the microneedle array 330 may be mounted directly to the PCB 324, without the sensor standoff PCB 322.
Analog Front End
In some variations, the electronics system of the analyte monitoring device may include an analog front end. The analog front end may include sensor circuitry (e.g., sensor circuitry 124 as shown in
In some variations, the analog front end device may be compatible with both two and three terminal electrochemical sensors, such as to enable both DC current measurement, AC current measurement, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement capabilities. Furthermore, the analog front end may include an internal temperature sensor and programmable voltage reference, support external temperature monitoring and an external reference source and integrate voltage monitoring of bias and supply voltages for safety and compliance.
In some variations, the analog front end may include a multi-channel potentiostat to multiplex sensor inputs and handle multiple signal channels. For example, the analog front end may include a multi-channel potentiostat such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,933,387, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
In some variations, the analog front end and peripheral electronics may be integrated into an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), which may help reduce cost, for example. This integrated solution may include the microcontroller described below, in some variations.
Microcontroller
In some variations, the electronics system of the analyte monitoring device may include at least one microcontroller (e.g., controller 122 as shown in
In some variations, the microcontroller may be configured to activate and/or inactivate the analyte monitoring device on one or more detected conditions. For example, the device may be configured to power on the analyte monitoring device upon insertion of the microneedle array into skin. This may, for example, enable a power-saving feature in which the battery is disconnected until the microneedle array is placed in skin, at which time the device may begin broadcasting sensor data. Such a feature may, for example, help improve the shelf life of the analyte monitoring device and/or simplify the analyte monitoring device-external device pairing process for the user.
Additionally or alternatively, the microcontroller may be configured to actively confirm the insertion of the microneedle array into skin based on sensor measurements performed with the microneedle array. For example, after two or more microneedles in the microneedle array are presumed to have been inserted into skin, a fixed or time-varying electrical potential or current may be applied to those microneedles. A measurement result (e.g., electrical potential or current value) of a signal generated between the electrodes of the inserted microneedles is measured, and then compared to a known reference value to corroborate successful insertion of the microneedle array into the skin. The reference value may, for example, include a voltage, a current, a resistant, a conductance, a capacitance, an inductance and/or an impedance. Other example variations of structures and methods for activating and/or inactivating an analyte monitoring device are described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/051,398 which was incorporated above by reference.
In some variations, the microcontroller may utilize an 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, or 64-bit data structure. Suitable microcontroller architectures include ARM® and RISC® architectures, and flash memory may be embedded or external to the microcontroller for suitable data storage. In some variations the microcontroller may be a single core microcontroller, while in some variations the microcontroller may be a multi-core (e.g., dual core) microcontroller which may enable flexible architectures for optimizing power and/or performance within the system. For example, the cores in the microcontroller may include similar or differing architectures. For example, in an example variation, the microcontroller may be a dual core microcontroller including a first core with a high performance and high power architecture, and a second core with a low performance and low power architecture. The first core may function as a “workhorse” in that it may be used to process higher performance functions (e.g., sensor measurements, algorithmic calculations, etc.), while the second core may be used to perform lower performance functions (e.g., background routines, data transmission, etc.). Accordingly, the different cores of the microcontroller may be run at different duty cycles (e.g., the second core for lower performance functions may be run at a higher duty cycles) optimized for their respective functions, thereby improving overall power efficiency. Additionally or alternatively, in some variations the microcontroller may include embedded analog circuitry, such as for interfacing with additional sensor(s) and/or the microneedle array. In some variations, the microcontroller may be configured to operate using a 0.8V-5V power source, such as a 1.2V-3V power source.
Communication Module
In some variations, the electronics system of the analyte monitoring device may include at least one communication module (e.g., communication module 126 as shown in
The communication module may further include or be coupled to one or more antennas (e.g., antenna 128 as shown in
Devices can come in and out of range from the communication module to connect and reconnect so that the user is able to seamlessly connect and transfer information between devices. In some variations, the microcontroller on each analyte monitoring device may have a unique serial number, which enables tracking of specific analyte monitoring devices during production and/or field use.
Additional Sensors
As described above, in some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include one or more sensors in addition the microneedle array. For example, the analyte monitoring device may include one or more temperature sensors configured to measure skin temperature, thereby enabling temperature compensation for the analyte sensor(s). For example, in some variations, a temperature sensor (e.g., thermistor, RTD, semiconductor junction, bimetallic sensor, thermopile sensor) may be coupled to the device PCB within the housing such that the temperature sensor is arranged near a skin-facing portion or bottom portion of the housing 112. The housing may be thinned to reduce thermal resistance and improve heat transfer and hence measurement accuracy. Additionally or alternatively, a thermally conductive material may thermally couple a surface-mount temperature sensor to the user's skin. In variations in which the temperature sensor is coupled to the device PCB near the microneedle array die substrate, the thermally conductive material may, for example, be molded as a skirt to relieve the sharp edges of the die and wrap along the edges of the die and along the surface of the main PCB.
In some variations, the temperature sensor may be employed to develop a glucose interpolation characteristic based on measured current and an a priori sensitivity (e.g., nA/mM or pA/mg/dL). In the temperature-invariant case, the electrical current characteristic can be modeled by the following relation: y=mG[G] where y is the measured current, mG is the glucose sensitivity, and [G] is the interpolated glucose concentration. In some cases, such as the incorporation of an analyte insensitive channel b, the background signal may be incorporated into the equation above: y=mG[G]+b. Incorporating the measurements from a temperature sensor, the electrical current characteristic can be represented by the following relation: y=mG[G]+mT[T]+b where mT is the temperature sensitivity (e.g., pA/° C.), T is the measured temperature, and b is the background signal (e.g., pA). In other operating scenarios, the electrical current characteristic is modeled by the following relation: y=m1[G][T]+b where m1 is a weighting factor determined a priori. In other operating scenarios, the electrical current characteristic can be modeled as a convolution of temperature and glucose: y={mT[T]+m2}[G]+b where m2 is a weighting factor determined a priori. In yet other operating scenarios, the electrical current characteristic is provided by the following relation: y={mG[G]+m2}[T][G]+b. In yet other operating scenarios, the electrical current characteristic is given by the following nonlinear relation: y={mG2[G]2+mG[G]}[T]+b where mG2 is a nonlinear weighting factor. In yet other operating scenarios, the electrical current characteristic is given by the following Gaussian relation: y=mG[G]exp{−([T]−[TOPT])2/(2σ2)}+b where TOPT is the optimal temperature for maximal catalytic turnover of the enzyme and G is the operating temperature range of the enzyme.
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include at least one microneedle with an electrode configured to function as an analyte insensitive channel (e.g., glucose insensitive channel) having a known temperature sensitivity, where such a known temperature sensitivity may be used to compensate for temperature. For example, one advantage of using a glucose insensitive channel includes proximity to the glucose sensor (e.g., resulting in less error from thermal gradients) and cost (e.g., by reducing external components and specialized processes to thermally couple the sensor to the skin). In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include both an analyte insensitive channel along with a thermistor, with an algorithm that utilizes information from both. Additionally or alternatively, the analyte monitoring device may include an additional sensor(s) that measures ambient temperature, which may also be useful in the temperature compensation algorithm.
In some variations, the analyte insensitive channel may be used to perform differential measurements and/or subtract background noise levels from the analyte-sensitive channel(s) to improve signal fidelity and/or signal-to-noise ratio. The analyte insensitive channel may be sensitive to common mode signals that also arise on the analyte-sensitive channel(s) (e.g., endogenous and pharmacologic interference, pressure attenuations, etc.).
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include at least one kinetic sensor. The kinetic sensor may, for example, comprise an accelerometer, gyroscope, and/or inertial measurement unit to capture positional, displacement, trajectory, velocity, acceleration, and/or device orientation values. For example, such measurements may be used to infer the wearer's physical activity (e.g., steps, intense exercise) over a finite duration. Additionally or alternatively, in some variations, the kinetic sensor(s) may be employed to enable detection of wearer interactions with the analyte monitoring device such as touch or tapping. For example, touch or tap detection can be employed to silence or snooze notifications, alerts, and alarms, control a wirelessly connected mobile computing device, or to activate/deactivate a user interface on the analyte monitoring device (e.g., an embedded display or indicator light). Touching or tapping may be performed in a defined sequence and/or for a predetermined duration (e.g., at least 3 seconds, at least 5 seconds) to elicit certain actions (e.g., display or indicator light deactivation/activation). Additionally or alternatively, in some variations, the analyte monitoring device may enter into a power saving mode upon detection of limited motion or activity (e.g., absence of significant acceleration) for at least a predetermined period of time (e.g., 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, or other suitable of time), as measured by the kinetic sensor(s).
Additionally, or alternatively, in some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include at least one real-time clock (RTC). The real-time clock may be employed to track absolute time (e.g., Coordinated Universal Time, UTC, or local time) when the analyte monitoring device is in storage or during use. In some variations, synchronization to absolute time may be performed following manufacturing of the analyte monitoring device. The real-time clock may be employed to time-stamp analyte measurements (e.g., glucose measurements) during operation of the analyte monitoring device in order to create a time-series data set that is communicated to a connected peripheral device (e.g., mobile computing device), cloud storage, or other suitable data storage device, such as for later review by the user (e.g., wearer of the analyte monitoring device), their support network, or their healthcare provider, etc.
Power Source(s)
As shown in
In some variations, the power source may be coupled to the device PCB using a low profile holder or mount that reduces the overall height of the electronics, thereby minimizing the height or profile of the analyte monitoring device. For example, whereas traditional battery holders apply force to the topside of the battery using a conductive metal with a spring force, in some variations a lateral mounted battery holder may contact the sides of the battery to complete the electrical circuit. For example, as shown in
Applicator
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may be applied manually. For example, a user may remove a protective film on the adhesive layer, and manually press the device onto his or her skin on a desired wear site. Additionally or alternatively, as illustrated in
Kits
In some variations, some or all components of the analyte monitoring system may be provided in a kit (e.g., to a user, to a clinician, etc.). For example, a kit may include at least one analyte monitoring device 110 and/or at least one applicator 160. In some variations, a kit may include multiple analyte monitoring devices 110, which may form a supply of analyte monitoring devices sufficient that is for a predetermined period of time (e.g., a week, two weeks, three weeks, a month, two months, three months, six months, a year, etc.). The kit may include any suitable ratio of applicators to analyte monitoring devices (e.g., 1:1, lower than 1:1, greater than 1:1). For example, the kit may include the same number of applicators as analyte monitoring devices, such as if each applicator is single-use and is configured to be disposed after its use in applying a respective analyte monitoring device to the user. As another example, the kit may include a number of applicators that is lower than the number of analyte monitoring devices in the kit (e.g., one applicator per two or three analyte monitoring devices), such as if an applicator is intended to be reused for applying multiple analyte monitoring devices or if multiple analyte monitoring devices are loaded into a single applicator for repeated applications. As another example, the kit may include a number of applicators that is higher than the number of analyte monitoring devices in the kit (e.g., two applicators per analyte monitoring device), such as to provide extra or redundant applicators in case of applicator loss or breakage, etc.
In some variations, the kit may further include user instructions for operating the analyte monitoring device and/or applicator (e.g., instructions for applying the analyte monitoring device manually or with the applicator, instructions for pairing the analyte monitoring device with one or more peripheral devices (e.g., computing devices such as a mobile phone), etc.).
Sterilization of Analyte Monitoring Device
As described above, the analyte monitoring devices 110 such as those described herein are differentiated from other CGM devices at least in that the sensing elements (e.g., microneedle array) and electronics are integrated into one unit. One benefit to this integration is that the user is not required to perform any assembly of the analyte monitoring device 110. However, there are sterilization-related challenges to enabling such integration
Traditional CGM devices and similar electrochemical sensors are typically sterilized through processes that are incompatible with electronics. For example, conventional electrochemical sensor sterilization use gamma radiation or electron beam radiation to sterilize the sensing elements. However, the bosonic or fermionic particles associated with these sterilization processes interfere with electronics operation. Thus, typically the electronic component(s) must either be sterilized separately and require the end user to perform some assembly of the device, or the electronic component(s) are simply not sterilized, which may lead to contamination issues.
In contrast, the sensor technologies described above are configured to be compatible with a form of sterilization that is suitable for both the sensing elements and the electronics. In some variations, as described above, the working electrodes in the microneedle array may include a biorecognition layer including a cross-linked biorecognition element. For example, the biorecognition element may be cross-linked with an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species, which helps to bridge amine groups and thus help stabilize the biorecognition element within the biorecognition layer. For example, the biorecognition element may include an enzyme (e.g., glucose oxidase) that is cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, glyoxal, malonaldehyde, succinaldehyde, and/or other suitable species and then embedded in a conducting polymer as described above.
A result of the above-described cross-linked structure is that the enzyme is sufficiently stabilized so that it may undergo gaseous methods of sterilization, such as ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization, with surprisingly only minimal impact on sensing elements in terms of sensing performance. Thus, since electronics may undergo EO sterilization, in some variations the analyte monitoring devices 110 are uniquely and advantageously configured to survive an “all in one” sterilization procedure with their electronics and sensing elements fully integrated and simultaneously sterilized in a single unit, without damaging either set of components.
Accordingly, in some variations, a method of sterilizing an analyte monitoring device may include exposing the analyte monitoring device to a sterilant gas, where the analyte monitoring device includes a housing (e.g., wearable housing), a microneedle array extending from the housing and including an analyte sensor, and an electronics system arranged in the housing and electrically coupled to the microneedle array. The analyte monitoring device is exposed to the sterilant gas for a dwell time sufficient to sterilize the analyte monitoring device. In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may be sterilized to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10−6 (i.e., having a probability that not more than 1 viable microorganism among 1,000,000 sterilized devices).
Thus, for example, an analyte monitoring device may be placed within a preconditioning chamber for the preconditioning process 2120. As described above, the analyte monitoring device may be placed in the chamber as an integrated device, including both electrochemical sensing elements and electronic components.
Preconditioning may function to heat and humidify the analyte monitoring device to a stable temperature and moisture content prior to entering the sterilization chamber, which may help ensure consistency and reliability of the sterilization process, regardless of environmental conditions. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
An EO sterilization cycle was evaluated for feasibility to sterilize an analyte monitoring device such as those described herein. Briefly, the preconditioning was done for two hours at a temperature of 38 degrees Celsius. This was followed by exposure to EO gas for two hours at 38 degrees Celsius. After EO exposure, the samples were aerated to vent out the EO gas at ambient temperatures for a minimum of 12 hours. Details of the EO exposure protocol are shown in Table 1:
To test the stability of sensing chemistry following exposure to EO, six functionalized microneedle sensors were subject to an EO sterilization cycle. In this example, sensor chemistry using amide cross-linking of glucose oxidase was evaluated in this feasibility study.
Three of the sensors that were exposed to EO were also subsequently tested for operational stability in PBS with 6 mM glucose over seven days. Sensors were kept in solution and sensitivity was measured by calibrating the sensors once per day. The summary results from the operational stability testing are shown in
Additionally, three sensors exposed to EO were used to test the storage stability.
Thus, the cross-linked sensor chemistry was found to be sufficiently stable to EO exposure, indicating that using EO process is feasible to sterilize an analyte monitoring device with sensing elements including the cross-linked sensor chemistry. Additionally, the chemistry after EO exposure was stable over seven days of active operation and also during dry storage.
In some variations, the sensor may be decoupled from the electronics and undergo other suitable methods of sterilization, including those based on irradiation by means of gamma rays/particles or with an electron beam of sufficient acceleration potential. Dosage of sterilization (e.g., duration and particle energy) may be controlled in to achieve a satisfactory level of sterility, including a sterility assurance level (SAL) of less than 1E-6. In some variations, the electronics do not require sterilization as they do not contact breached or compromised skin surfaces. In such variations, the electronics may be coupled to the sensor prior to the application of the entire system to the user's skin.
Use of Analyte Monitoring System
Described below is an overview of various aspects of a method of use and operation of the analyte monitoring system, including the analyte monitoring device and peripheral devices, etc.
Application of Analyte Monitoring Device
As described above, the analyte monitoring device is applied to the skin of a user such that the microneedle array in the device penetrates the skin and the microneedle array's electrodes are positioned in the upper dermis for access to dermal interstitial fluid. For example, in some variations, the microneedle array may be geometrically configured to penetrate the outer layer of the skin, the stratum corneum, bore through the epidermis, and come to rest within the papillary or upper reticular dermis. The sensing region, confined to the electrode at the distal extent of each microneedle constituent of the array (as described above) may be configured to rest and remain seated in the papillary or upper reticular dermis following application in order to ensure adequate exposure to circulating dermal interstitial fluid (ISF) without the risk of bleeding or undue influence with nerve endings.
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may include a wearable housing or patch with an adhesive layer configured to adhere to the skin and fix the microneedle array in position. While the analyte monitoring device may be applied manually (e.g., removing a protective film on the adhesive layer, and manually pressing the patch onto the skin on a desired wear site), in some variations the analyte monitoring device may be applied to the skin using a suitable applicator.
The analyte monitoring device may be applied in any suitable location, though in some variations it may be desirable to avoid anatomical areas of thick or calloused skin (e.g., palmar and plantar regions), or areas undergoing significant flexion (e.g., olecranon or patella). Suitable wear sites may include, for example, on the arm (e.g., upper arm, lower arm), shoulder (e.g., over the deltoid), back of hands, neck, face, scalp, torso (e.g., on the back such as in the thoracic region, lumbar region, sacral region, etc. or on the chest or abdomen), buttocks, legs (e.g., upper legs, lower legs, etc.), and/or top of feet, etc.
As described above, in some variations the analyte monitoring device may be configured to automatically activate upon insertion, and/or confirm correct insertion into skin. Details of these features are described in further detail above. In some variations, methods for performing such activation and/or confirmation may be similar to that described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/051,398, which was incorporated by reference above.
Pairing to Peripheral Device
In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may be paired to at least one peripheral device such that the peripheral device receives broadcasted or otherwise transmitted data from the analyte monitoring device, including measurement data. Suitable peripheral devices include, for example a mobile computing device (e.g., smartphone, smartwatch) which may be executing a mobile application.
Additionally alternatively, an analyte monitoring device may be paired (or otherwise combined) with a therapeutic delivery device (e.g., insulin pen or pump). For example, an analyte monitoring device may be combined with a therapeutic delivery device in a manner similar to that described in U.S. Patent App. Nos. 62/823,628 and 62/862,658, each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. Studies have shown that users with insulin delivery devices that have smart algorithms controlling dosing are in euglycemic range (i.e. healthy blood glucose levels)>95% of the time when CGM is available. The ability of the analyte monitoring device to communicate directly with insulin delivery devices (i.e. no intermediary smartphone required) allows users to achieve increased time in range significantly by eliminating the time when CGM is not available (during warmup or swap in of analyte monitoring devices). This feature may also enable users to wear multiple analyte monitoring devices that detect different analytes simultaneously and input data into the same mobile application.
As described above, the pairing may be accomplished through suitable wireless communication modules (e.g., implementing Bluetooth). In some variations, the pairing may occur after the analyte monitoring device is applied and inserted into the skin of a user (e.g., after the analyte monitoring device is activated). Additionally or alternatively, the pairing may occur prior to the analyte monitoring device being applied and inserted into the skin of a user.
Thus, the paired mobile or other device may receive the broadcasted or transmitted data from the analyte monitoring device. The peripheral device may display, store, and/or transmit the measurement data to the user and/or healthcare provider and/or support network. Furthermore, in some variations, the said paired mobile or wearable device performs algorithmic treatment to the data to improve the signal fidelity, accuracy, and/or calibration, etc. In some variations, measurement data and/or other user info may additionally or alternatively be communicated and/or stored via network (e.g., cloud network).
By way of illustration, in some variations a mobile computing device or other computing device (e.g., smartphones, smartwatches, tablets, etc.) may be configured to execute a mobile application that provides an interface to display estimated glucose values, trend information and historical data, etc. Although the below description refers specifically to glucose as a target analyte, it should be understood that the features and processes described below with respect to glucose may be similarly applied to applications relating to other kinds of analytes.
In some variations, the mobile application may use the mobile computing device's Bluetooth framework to scan for the analyte monitoring device. As shown in
In some variations, the Bluetooth® Low Energy™ (BLE) protocol may be used for connectivity. For example, the sensor implements a custom BLE peripheral profile for the analyte monitoring system. Data may be exchanged after establishing a standard secure BLE connection between the analyte monitoring device and the smartphone, smartwatch, or tablet running the mobile application. The BLE connection may be maintained permanently for the life of the sensor. If the connection is broken due to any reasons (e.g., weak signal) the analyte monitoring device may start advertising itself again and the mobile application may re-establish the connection at the earliest opportunity (i.e. when in range/physical proximity).
In some variations, there may be one or more additional layers of security implemented on top of the BLE connection to ensure authorized access consisting of a combination of one or more techniques such as passcode-protection, shared-secrets, encryption and multi-factor authentication.
The mobile application may guide the user through initiating a new analyte monitoring device. Once this process completes, the mobile application is not be required for the analyte monitoring device to operate and record measurements. In some variations, a smart insulin delivery device that is connected to the analyte monitoring device can be authorized from the mobile application to receive glucose readings from the sensor directly. Additionally or alternatively, a secondary display device like a smartwatch can be authorized from the mobile application to receive glucose readings from the sensor directly.
Furthermore, in some variations the mobile application may additionally or alternatively help calibrate the analyte monitoring device. For example, the analyte monitoring device may indicate a request for calibration to the mobile application, and the mobile application may request calibration input from the user to calibrate the sensor.
Sensor Measurements
Once the analyte monitoring device is inserted and warm-up and any calibration has completed, the analyte monitoring device may be ready for providing sensor measurements of a target analyte. The target analyte (and any requisite co-factor(s)) diffuses from the biological milieu, through the biocompatible and diffusion-limiting layers on the working electrode, and to the biorecognition layer including the biorecognition element. In the presence of a co-factor (if present), the biorecognition element may convert the target analyte to an electroactive product.
A bias potential may be applied between the working and reference electrodes of the analyte monitoring device, and an electrical current may flow from the counter electrode to maintain the fixed potential relationship between the working and reference electrodes. This causes the oxidation or reduction of the electroactive product, causing a current to flow between the working electrodes and counter electrodes. The current value is proportional to the rate of the redox reaction at the working electrode and, specifically, to the concentration of the analyte of interest according to the Cottrell relation as described in further detail above.
The electrical current may be converted to a voltage signal by a transimpedance amplifier and quantized to a digital bitstream by means of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Alternatively, the electrical current may be directly quantized to a digital bitstream by means of a current-mode ADC. The digital representation of the electrical current may be processed in the embedded microcontroller(s) in the analyte monitoring device and relayed to the wireless communication module for broadcast or transmission (e.g., to one or more peripheral devices). In some variations, the microcontroller may perform additional algorithmic treatment to the data to improve the signal fidelity, accuracy, and/or calibration, etc.
In some variations, the digital representation of the electrical current, or sensor signal, may be correlated to an analyte measurement (e.g., glucose measurement) by the analyte monitoring device. For example, the microcontroller may execute a programmed routine in firmware to interpret the digital signal and perform any relevant algorithms and/or other analysis. Keeping the analysis on-board the analyte monitoring device may, for example, enable the analyte monitoring device to broadcast analyte measurement(s) to multiple devices in parallel, while ensuring that each connected device has the same information. Thus, generally, the user's target analyte (e.g., glucose) values may be estimated and stored in the analyte monitoring device and communicated to one or more peripheral devices.
Data exchange can be initiated by either the mobile application or by the analyte monitoring device. For example, the analyte monitoring device may notify the mobile application of new analyte data as it becomes available. The frequency of updates may vary, for example, between about 5 seconds and about 5 minutes, and may depend on the type of data. Additionally or alternatively, the mobile application may request data from the analyte monitoring device (e.g., if the mobile application identifies gaps in the data it has collected, such as due to disconnections).
If the mobile application is not connected to the analyte monitoring device, the mobile application may not receive data from the sensor electronics. However, the electronics in the analyte monitoring device may store each actual and/or estimated analyte data point. When the mobile application is reconnected to the analyte monitoring device, it may request data that it has missed during the period of disconnection and the electronics on the analyte monitoring device may transmit that set of data as well (e.g., backfill).
Generally, the mobile application may be configured to provide display of real-time or near real-time analyte measurement data, such as on the display of the mobile computing device executing the mobile application. In some variations, the mobile application may communicate through a user interface regarding analysis of the analyte measurement, such as alerts, alarms, insights on trends, etc. such as to notify the user of analyte measurements requiring attention or follow-up action (e.g., high analyte values, low analyte values, high rates of change, analyte values outside of a pre-set range, etc.). In some variations, the mobile application may additionally or alternatively facilitate communication of the measurement data to the cloud for storage and/or archive for later retrieval.
Interpreting Analyte Monitoring Device User Interface
In some variations, information relating to analyte measurement data and/or the analyte monitoring device may be communicated via a user interface of the analyte monitoring device. In some variations, the user interface of the analyte monitoring device may be used to communicate information to a user in addition to, or as an alternative to, communicating such information via a peripheral device such as through a mobile application on a computing device. Accordingly, a user and/or those around the user may easily and intuitively view the analyte monitoring device itself for an assessment of analyte measurement data (e.g., analyte measurement status such as current and/or trending analyte measurement levels) and/or device status, without the need to view a separate device (e.g., peripheral device or other device remote from, and in communication with, the analyte monitoring device). Availability of such information directly on the analyte monitoring device itself may also enable a user and/or those around the user to more promptly be alerted of any concerns (e.g., analyte measurements that are above or below target range, and/or analyte measurements that are increasing or decreasing at an alarming rate), thereby enabling a user to take appropriate corrective action more quickly.
For example,
The indicator lights 3224a-3224c may be arranged in a sequential manner such that their relative positions help a user to intuitively understand information communicated collectively by the user interface. For example, the three indicator lights 3224a-3224c may be illuminated to generally indicate three progressive levels (or ranges) of analyte measurements: the lowest indicator light 3224a may be illuminated to generally indicate an analyte measurement that is lowest of the three levels, the middle indicator light 3224b may be illuminated to generally indicate an analyte measurement that is in the middle of the three levels, and the highest indicator light 3224c may be illuminated to generally indicate an analyte measurement that is highest of the three levels. In one example variation, the lowest indicator light 3224a may be illuminated to indicate an analyte measurement that is in a target range (
The threshold values for a target range may be any suitable values. For example, in some variations in which glucose monitoring is being performed, analyte measurements may be considered within a target range if they are between about 70 mg/dL and about 180 mg/dL (or between about 80 mg/dL or about 60 mg/dL and about 170 mg/dL or about 190 mg/dL, etc.), and may be considered below a target range if they are below about 70 mg/dL (or below about 80 mg/dL, or below about 60 mg/dL, etc.). The different thresholds for “above” a target range and “significantly” above a target range may have any suitable value. For example, in some variations, analyte measurements may be considered “above” a target range if it is above a first predetermined threshold (e.g., above a threshold value of about 180 mg/dL for hyperglycemia determination in glucose monitoring, or above a threshold value that is between about 170 mg/dL and about 200 mg/dL for hyperglycemia determination in glucose monitoring) and analyte measurement may be considered “significantly above” a target range if it is a predetermined amount (e.g., percentage) above the first predetermined threshold, such as at least 33% above the first predetermined threshold (e.g., >240 mg/dL for extreme hyperglycemia determination in glucose monitoring), or at least about 25% above the first predetermined threshold, at least about 30% above the first predetermined threshold, at least 35% above the first predetermined threshold, or at least 40% above the first predetermined threshold, or other suitable second predetermined threshold.
Furthermore, the thresholds for considering analyte measurements within target range, or below target range, or “above” target range or “significantly above” target range (or other characterization of the analyte measurements) may be static or dynamic, and/or may vary based on user information such as historical measurements and/or trends or other historical data (e.g., relative to an average or expected analyte measurement for the user at particular times or average or expected rate of change). Furthermore, it should be understood that while the user interface 3220 includes three sequential indicator lights, in other variations a user interface on the housing of an analyte monitoring device may include fewer (e.g., two) or more (e.g., four, five, six, or more) that may be similarly illuminated individually to indicate an analyte measurement (e.g., each corresponding to a general relative level of analyte measurement).
In some variations, different illumination colors and/or timing for one or more of the indicator lights 3224a-3224c may additionally or alternatively enable a user to easily distinguish between each analyte measurement level. For example, when an analyte measurement is within a target range, the appropriate indicator light(s) may be illuminated in a first color (e.g., blue), while when the analyte measurement is outside the target range, the appropriate indicator light(s) may be illuminated in another color (e.g., white for below target range, orange for above target range). As another example, when the analyte measurement is within a target range, the appropriate indicator light(s) may be illuminated in a first temporal pattern (e.g., long, gentle pulse of illumination “on” time), while when the analyte measurement is outside the target range, the appropriate indicator light(s) may be illuminated in another temporal pattern (e.g., short, flash-like pulse of illumination “on” time). Shorter pulses of illumination “on” time may, for example, be helpful to better attract user attention and/or more intuitively communicate an alert when the analyte measurement is below a target range, above a target range, or significantly above a target range. Higher frequency illumination may, in some variations, correlate to greater alert level (e.g., significantly below the target range or significantly above the target range).
Additionally or alternatively, in some variations, the indicator lights 3224a-3224c may be illuminated in a progressive sequence to indicate trend information of analyte measurements over time. For example, as shown in
As another example, as shown in
It should be understood that other variations of progressive sequences of illumination may be used to similarly indicate analyte measurement trends. For example, a 1-dimensional array of indicator lights (e.g., arranged in a row, a column, an arc, etc.) may be illuminated in a progressive sequence from a first end of the array to a second end of the array to indicate a rising analyte measurement trend, and illuminated in a progressive sequence from a second end of the array to a first end of the array to indicate a falling analyte measurement trend. For example, progressive sequences of illumination may be characterized as left-to-right, right-to-left, top-to-bottom, bottom-to-top, clockwise, counter-clockwise, etc. Furthermore, it should be understood that while the user interface 3220 includes three sequential indicator lights, in other variations a user interface on the housing of an analyte monitoring device may include fewer (e.g., two) or more (e.g., four, five, six, or more) that may be similarly illuminated in a progressive sequence to indicate rising and/or falling analyte measurement trends.
In some variations, within each rising or falling sequence of illumination across the indicator lights, the illumination of adjacent indicator lights may be interspersed by an illumination “off” period. Furthermore, in some variations, the pace at which the illumination transitions between indicator lights may indicate rate of change of analyte measurements. For example, the faster the illumination transitions from lower to higher indicator lights, the faster the rate of change (and potentially the greater urgency or need for user attention to the trend). Additionally or alternatively, each rising or falling sequence of illumination across the indicator lights may be separated by a sequence end illumination “off” time in order to help distinguish between a rising sequence and a falling sequence. The sequence end illumination “off” time may be longer than the illumination “off” period within each sequence. In some variations, the start or end of each rising or falling sequence of illumination may additionally or alternatively be demarcated in any suitable manner (e.g., illuminating all lights simultaneously at the start or end of a rising or falling sequence).
Table 3 illustrates different illumination modes used in an example method of operating the user interface 3220 of an analyte monitoring device to indicate analyte measurement trends. The exact parameter values of these illumination modes are non-limiting and are included for an example variation for illustrative purposes only. For example, in a progressive sequence of illumination (e.g., for any one of more suitable illumination modes), the illumination color may be any suitable color, and/or the illumination “on” time may be between about 0.1 seconds and 1 second, between about 0.2 seconds and 0.5 seconds, or about 0.3 seconds, and/or the illumination “off” time between illumination of adjacent indicator lights may be between about 0.05 seconds and about 1 second, between about 0.1 seconds and about 0.5 seconds, or about 0.18 seconds, and/or the ratio between the illumination “on” time and illumination “off” time may be about 1, about 1.5, or about 2, and/or the sequence end may be designated by illumination “off” for between about 2 seconds and about 5 seconds, or about 3 seconds. Furthermore, fewer or more illumination modes for indicating analyte measurement trends may be possible in other variations.
Additionally or alternatively, an indicator light 3222 may be selectively illuminated to communicate a device status. Similar to that described above, color and/or timing of illumination may be varied in a predetermined manner to indicate different device statuses. Status may, for example, include a warm-up period notification, an end-of-life notification, a sensor fault state notification, a sensor failure mode (e.g., improper insertion) notification, a low battery notification, and/or a device error notification. Furthermore, any suitable number of indicators lights may be illuminated individually and/or collectively (e.g., in sequence or simultaneously) to indicate different device statuses. For example, as shown in
Table 4 illustrates different illumination modes used in an example method of operating the user interface of an analyte monitoring device to indicate device status. The exact parameter values of these illumination modes are non-limiting and are included for an example variation for illustrative purposes only. For example, in the “wait” illumination mode, the illumination color may be any suitable color, and/or the illumination “on” time may be between about 0.1 seconds and about 3 seconds, between about 0.5 seconds and about 2 seconds, or about 1 second, and/or the illumination “off” mode may be between about 0.5 seconds and about 5 seconds, or between about 1 second and about 4 seconds, or between about 2 seconds and about 4 seconds, or about 3 seconds, and/or the ratio between the illumination “on” and illumination “off” times may be about 0.1, about 0.2, about 0.3, about 0.4, about 0.5, and/or other suitable illumination parameters. As another example, in the “end of life” illumination mode, the illumination color may be any suitable color, and/or the illumination “on” time may be between about 0.01 seconds and about 1 second, between about 0.01 seconds and about 0.5 seconds, between about 0.01 seconds and about 0.3 seconds, between about 0.01 seconds and about 0.1 seconds, or about 0.04 seconds, and/or the illumination “off” time may be between about 1 second and about 10 seconds, between about 3 seconds and about 8 seconds, or about 6 seconds, and/or the ratio between the illumination “on” and illumination “off” times may be about 0.3, about 0.2, about 0.1, about 0.05, about 0.01, or less than about 0.01, and/or other suitable illumination parameters. Although only two illumination modes are shown, in some variations an analyte monitoring device may have fewer or more illumination modes, such as for each of the above statuses (e.g., first illumination mode for a device warmup period, a second illumination mode for detection of a temporary error, a third illumination mode for determination of an end of device lifetime, a fourth illumination mode for detection of a permanent error, etc.).
In some variations, a photodiode, phototransistor, photodetector, or other suitable ambient light sensor may be employed to measure the illumination level in the device's immediate environment. The ambient light measurement may, for example, be used to trigger an adjustment (e.g., dimming) of the brightness of the user interface (e.g., display, indicator light(s), etc.) to conserve battery charge in a power saving mode, to improve contrast under various illumination scenarios, and/or to reduce device visibility to other individuals. For example, the analyte monitoring device may enter the power saving mode in response to measurements from the ambient light sensor indicating general absence of ambient light (e.g., sufficient darkness for at least a predetermined period of time) such as when the device is placed under the clothing of a wearer or when the wearer is asleep in a dark environment. In these scenarios, the power saving mode may be practical because the indicator lights may have limited utility when concealed and out of view of the wearer (e.g., under clothing) or otherwise may be perceived as an annoyance (e.g., during slumber), etc. In response to measurements from the ambient light sensor indicating exposure to ambient light (e.g., sufficient brightness for at least a predetermined period of time), the analyte monitoring device may then exit the power saving mode and increase the brightness of the user interface accordingly.
Additional System Functions
In some variations, the mobile application may help a user manage the lifetimes and replacement of analyte monitoring devices. For example, the mobile application may terminate data display when the wear period of the analyte monitoring device has elapsed. In some variations, the analyte monitoring device may have enhanced longevity compared to conventional CGM devices. For example, the analyte monitoring devices described herein may have a wear period (e.g., intended lifetime) of at least 3 days, at least 5 days, at least 6 days, at least 7 days, at least 10 days, or at least 12 days, between 5 days and between 10 days, between 10 days and 14 days, etc. without material loss in performance.
Additionally or alternatively, mobile application may provide configurable alerts to the user that the wear period is about to elapse, which permits users to apply a new analyte monitoring device when the current analyte monitoring device is still active but close to expiry. Additionally, the new analyte monitoring device can warm up (typically between about 30 minutes and about 2 hours) while the old unit is still delivering analyte measurements. The old analyte monitoring device can then be removed upon expiry. The new analyte monitoring device may then become the primary sensor delivering analyte measurements to the mobile application. This may provide for an uninterrupted coverage for analyte measurements. Additionally, the readings from the old analyte monitoring device may be used to calibrate or algorithmically improve the accuracy of the new analyte monitoring device.
In some variations, an analyte monitoring device may have a unique serial number contained within the microcontroller (e.g., located in the electronics system). This serial number may enable sensors to be tracked from manufacturing and throughout the use of the product. For example, sensor device history records including manufacturing and customer use may be transmitted and stored in the cloud database. This enables tracking and inferences to be made on various parameters such as sensor performance metrics and improvement for individual users as well as sensor lots, tracking defective sensor lots back from field data to manufacturing or supplier issues very rapidly, personalized health monitoring features for individual users, etc.
In some variations, the system may be able to track inventory of analyte monitoring devices from warehousing to purchasing transactions to product use, which may enable the system to assist users in fulfillment of timely orders (e.g., to ensure that users don't run out of analyte monitoring devices). Additionally or alternatively, fulfillment can be executed automatically as monitoring device utilization is tracked, and timely delivery can be made to the user's residence to help ensure that sensor supply never depletes (e.g. ‘just-in-time’ delivery). This can interface with virtual or e-pharmacies, logistics centers, and/or web-based sales portals, such as Amazon™.
Through web portals, the cloud infrastructure may also allow users to view their real-time and historical glucose data/trends and share the said data with caregivers, their healthcare provider(s), support network, and/or other suitable persons.
Embodiment I-1. A microneedle array for use in sensing an analyte, comprising:
Embodiment I-2. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the electrode is a working electrode configured to sense at least one analyte and the at least one microneedle comprises a biorecognition layer arranged over the working electrode, wherein the biorecognition layer comprises a biorecognition element.
Embodiment I-3. The microneedle array of embodiment I-2, wherein the biorecognition element comprises an enzyme.
Embodiment I-4. The microneedle array of embodiment I-3, wherein the enzyme is an oxidoreductase.
Embodiment I-5. The microneedle array of embodiment I-4, wherein the oxidoreductase is at least one of lactate oxidase, alcohol oxidase, beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, tyrosinase, catalase, ascorbate oxidase, cholesterol oxidase, choline oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, urate oxidase, urease, and xanthine oxidase.
Embodiment I-6. The microneedle array of embodiment I-4, wherein the oxidoreductase is glucose oxidase.
Embodiment I-7. The microneedle array of embodiment I-2, wherein the biorecognition element is cross-linked with an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species.
Embodiment I-8. The microneedle array of embodiment I-7, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is at least one of formaldehyde, glyoxal, malonaldehyde, and succinaldehyde.
Embodiment I-9. The microneedle array of embodiment I-7, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is glutaraldehyde.
Embodiment I-10. The microneedle array of embodiment I-2, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises at least one of a diffusion-limiting layer and a hydrophilic layer arranged over the biorecognition layer.
Embodiment I-11. The microneedle array of embodiment I-2, wherein the microneedle array comprises at least one microneedle comprising a counter electrode configured to source or sink current to sustain an electrochemical reaction on the working electrode.
Embodiment I-12. The microneedle array of embodiment I-2, wherein the microneedle array comprises at least one microneedle comprising a reference electrode configured to provide a reference potential for the working electrode.
Embodiment I-13. The microneedle array of embodiment I-12, further comprising a conducting polymer arranged over the reference electrode.
Embodiment I-14. The microneedle array of embodiment I-13, wherein the conducting polymer comprises a dopant.
Embodiment I-15. The microneedle array of embodiment I-13, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal oxide with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-16. The microneedle array of embodiment I-15, wherein the metal oxide comprises iridium oxide.
Embodiment I-17. The microneedle array of embodiment I-13, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal salt with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-18. The microneedle array of embodiment I-17, wherein the metal salt comprises silver chloride.
Embodiment I-19. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the entirety of the electrode is on the tapered distal portion of the at least one microneedle.
Embodiment I-20. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the electrode comprises a catalytic surface.
Embodiment I-21. The microneedle array of embodiment I-20, wherein the catalytic surface comprises at least one of platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, gold, ruthenium, titanium, nickel, carbon, and doped diamond.
Embodiment I-22. The microneedle array of embodiment I-20, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises platinum black arranged over the electrode.
Embodiment I-23. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein a distal end of the electrode is offset from the distal apex by an offset distance of at least about 10 μm, wherein the offset distance is measured along a longitudinal axis of the at least one microneedle.
Embodiment I-24. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the electrode is annular.
Embodiment I-25. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein a portion of the working electrode is recessed into the tapered distal portion.
Embodiment I-26. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the electrode is on only a segment of the tapered distal portion.
Embodiment I-27. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, further comprising an electrical contact, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises a body portion providing a conductive pathway between the electrical contact and the electrode.
Embodiment I-28. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein the body portion is formed from a conductive material.
Embodiment I-29. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein the body portion comprises an embedded pathway.
Embodiment I-30. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein the body portion is insulated.
Embodiment I-31. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein the body portion has a circular, square, or an octagonal base.
Embodiment I-32. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein at least a segment of the body portion is columnar.
Embodiment I-33. The microneedle array of embodiment I-27, wherein at least a segment of the body portion is pyramidal.
Embodiment I-34. The microneedle array of embodiment I-33, wherein at least a portion of the body portion has a first taper angle measured relative to a base of the body portion and the distal apex has a second taper angle measured relative to the base, wherein the second taper angle is greater than the first taper angle.
Embodiment I-35. The microneedle array of embodiment I-34, wherein at least one of the body portion and the distal portion of the microneedle is radially asymmetric.
Embodiment I-36. The microneedle array of embodiment I-35, wherein the tapered distal portion comprises a planar surface that is offset from the distal apex of the at least one microneedle.
Embodiment I-37. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein each of the microneedles in the plurality of microneedles comprises a
Embodiment I-38. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the microneedles of the plurality of microneedles are electrically insulated from one another.
Embodiment I-39. The microneedle array of embodiment I-38, wherein the microneedle array is configured to detect multiple analytes.
Embodiment I-40. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the microneedles of the plurality of microneedles are arranged in a periodic grid.
Embodiment I-41. The microneedle array of embodiment I-40, wherein the periodic grid comprises a rectangular array.
Embodiment I-42. The microneedle array of embodiment I-40, wherein the periodic grid comprises a hexagonal array.
Embodiment I-43. The microneedle array of embodiment I-40, wherein the microneedles in the periodic grid are spaced apart by a distance between about 200 μm and about 800 μm.
Embodiment I-44. The microneedle array of embodiment I-40, wherein the microneedles in the periodic grid are uniformly spaced apart.
Embodiment I-45. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the plurality of microneedles comprises at least one delivery microneedle with a lumen.
Embodiment I-46. The microneedle array of embodiment I-1, wherein the at least one microneedle is configured to puncture skin of a user and sense an analyte in interstitial fluid in a dermal layer of the user.
Embodiment I-47. An analyte monitoring system comprising the microneedle array of embodiment I-1 and a wearable housing, wherein the microneedle array extends outwardly from the housing.
Embodiment I-48. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the at least one microneedle extends from the housing such that a distal end of the electrode is located less than about 5 mm from the housing.
Embodiment I-49. The system of embodiment I-48, wherein the at least one microneedle extends from the housing such that the distal end of the electrode is located less than about 1 mm from the housing.
Embodiment I-50. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the housing encloses an electronics system comprising at least one of a processor and a wireless communication module.
Embodiment I-51. The system of embodiment I-50, wherein the electronics system comprises a wireless communication module and the system further comprises a software application executable on a mobile computing device to be paired with the wireless communication module.
Embodiment I-52. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the housing comprises one or more indicator lights configured to communicate status information.
Embodiment I-53. The system of embodiment I-52, wherein at least one of the indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated in accordance with an illumination mode corresponding to an analyte measurement status.
Embodiment I-54. The system of embodiment I-53, wherein at least one of the indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated to communicate a current analyte measurement level.
Embodiment I-55. The system of embodiment I-53, wherein the user interface comprises a plurality of indicator lights configured to be selectively illuminated in a progressive sequence to communicate an analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-56. The system of embodiment I-55, wherein the plurality of indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated in a first progressive sequence in a first direction to communicate a rising analyte measurement trend, and is further configured to be selectively illuminated in a second progressive sequence in a second direction to communicate a falling analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-57. The system of embodiment I-52, wherein the user interface is further configured to communicate information indicative of a status of the analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-58. The system of embodiment I-47, further comprising an adhesive configured to couple the housing to the skin of a user.
Embodiment I-59. The system of embodiment I-47, further comprising an applicator configured to apply the at least a portion of the analyte monitoring system to the skin of a user.
Embodiment I-60. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the analyte monitoring system is a skin-adhered patch.
Embodiment I-61. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the plurality of microneedles comprises at least one delivery microneedle with a lumen.
Embodiment I-62. The system of embodiment I-47, wherein the plurality of microneedles comprises at least one solid microneedle comprising a coating comprising a therapeutic substance.
Embodiment I-63. The system of embodiment I-62, wherein the therapeutic substance comprises at least one of insulin, glucagon, metformin, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, isobutylphenylpropionic acid, levodopa, a statin, a hydrocodone, an opioid, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, an anesthetic, an analgesic, an anticonvulsant, an antidepressant, an antipsychotic, a sedative, a relaxant, a hormonal agent, an antibacterial agent, and an antiviral agent.
Embodiment I-64. A method for monitoring a user, comprising:
Embodiment I-65. The method of embodiment I-64, wherein the body fluid comprises a dermal interstitial fluid of the user.
Embodiment I-66. The method of embodiment I-64, wherein the one or more analytes comprises glucose.
Embodiment I-67. A microneedle array for use in sensing an analyte, comprising:
Embodiment I-68. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the electrode is a working electrode configured to sense at least one analyte and the at least one microneedle comprises a biorecognition layer arranged over the working electrode, wherein the biorecognition layer comprises a biorecognition element.
Embodiment I-69. The microneedle array of embodiment I-68, wherein the biorecognition element comprises glucose oxidase.
Embodiment I-70. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the distal end of the electrode is offset from the distal apex by an offset distance of at least about 10 μm, wherein the offset distance is measured along a longitudinal axis of the at least one microneedle.
Embodiment I-71. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the electrode is annular.
Embodiment I-72. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein in at least one microneedle, a portion of the working electrode is recessed into the tapered distal portion.
Embodiment I-73. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the electrode is on only a segment of the tapered distal portion.
Embodiment I-74. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, further comprising an electrical contact, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises a body portion providing a conductive pathway between the electrical contact and the electrode.
Embodiment I-75. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein each of the microneedles in the plurality of microneedles comprises a
Embodiment I-76. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the microneedle array comprises a plurality of working electrodes, wherein each working electrode is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other working electrode in the analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-77. The microneedle array of embodiment I-76, wherein the microneedle array is configured to detect multiple analytes.
Embodiment I-78. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the microneedles of the plurality of microneedles are arranged in a hexagonal array.
Embodiment I-79. The microneedle array of embodiment I-67, wherein the at least one microneedle is configured to puncture skin of a user and sense an analyte in interstitial fluid in a dermal layer of the user.
Embodiment I-80. An analyte monitoring system comprising the microneedle array of embodiment I-67 and a wearable housing, wherein the microneedle array extends outwardly from the housing.
Embodiment I-81. The system of embodiment I-80, wherein the at least one microneedle extends from the housing such that the distal end of the electrode is located less than about 5 mm from the housing.
Embodiment I-82. The system of embodiment I-80, wherein the housing encloses an electronics system comprising a wireless communication module and the system further comprises a software application executable on a mobile computing device to be paired with the wireless communication module.
Embodiment I-83. The system of embodiment I-80, wherein the housing comprises a user interface comprising one or more indicator lights configured to communicate status information.
Embodiment I-84. The system of embodiment I-83, wherein at least one of the indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated in accordance with an illumination mode corresponding to an analyte measurement status.
Embodiment I-85. The system of embodiment I-83, wherein the analyte monitoring system comprises a skin-adhered patch.
Embodiment I-86. A method of sterilizing an analyte monitoring device, the method comprising:
Embodiment I-87. The method of embodiment I-86, wherein the sterilant gas is suitable for oxidative sterilization.
Embodiment I-88. The method of embodiment I-87, wherein the sterilant gas comprises ethylene oxide.
Embodiment I-89. The method of embodiment I-86, wherein the analyte sensor comprises an electrode.
Embodiment I-90. The method of embodiment I-89, wherein the analyte sensor comprises a biorecognition layer arranged over the electrode, wherein the biorecognition layer comprises a biorecognition element.
Embodiment I-91. The method of embodiment I-90, wherein the biorecognition element comprises an enzyme.
Embodiment I-92. The method of embodiment I-91, wherein the enzyme is an oxidoreductase.
Embodiment I-93. The method of embodiment I-92, wherein the oxidoreductase is at least one of lactate oxidase, alcohol oxidase, beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, tyrosinase, catalase, ascorbate oxidase, cholesterol oxidase, choline oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, urate oxidase, urease, and xanthine oxidase.
Embodiment I-94. The method of embodiment I-92, wherein the oxidoreductase is glucose oxidase.
Embodiment I-95. The method of embodiment I-90, wherein the biorecognition element is cross-linked with an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species.
Embodiment I-96. The method of embodiment I-95, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is at least one of formaldehyde, glyoxal, malonaldehyde, and succinaldehyde.
Embodiment I-97. The method of embodiment I-95, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is glutaraldehyde.
Embodiment I-98. The method of embodiment I-90, wherein the biorecognition layer is formed at least in part by cross-linking the biorecognition element to form cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates, and embedding the cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates in a conducting polymer.
Embodiment I-99. The method of embodiment I-98, wherein embedding the cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates comprises embedding only cross-linked biorecognition element aggregates having at least a threshold molecular weight.
Embodiment I-100. The method of embodiment I-86, wherein exposing the analyte monitoring device to the sterilant gas comprises injecting the sterilant gas into a compartment containing the analyte monitoring device, and heating the compartment to a sterilization temperature.
Embodiment I-101. The method of embodiment I-100, wherein the sterilization temperature is below about 45 degrees Celsius and the dwell time is at least about 2 hours.
Embodiment I-102. The method of embodiment I-86, further comprising preconditioning the analyte monitoring device prior to exposing the analyte monitoring device to the sterilant gas, wherein preconditioning the analyte comprises exposing the analyte monitoring device to steam.
Embodiment I-103. A microneedle array for an analyte monitoring device, the microneedle array comprising:
Embodiment I-104. The microneedle array of embodiment I-103, wherein at least one sensing microneedle comprises a biorecognition layer arranged over the working electrode, wherein the biorecognition layer comprises a biorecognition element.
Embodiment I-105. The microneedle array of embodiment I-104, wherein the biorecognition element comprises an enzyme.
Embodiment I-106. The microneedle array of embodiment I-105, wherein the enzyme is an oxidoreductase.
Embodiment I-107. The microneedle array of embodiment I-106, wherein the oxidoreductase is at least one of lactate oxidase, alcohol oxidase, beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, tyrosinase, catalase, ascorbate oxidase, cholesterol oxidase, choline oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, urate oxidase, urease, and xanthine oxidase.
Embodiment I-108. The microneedle array of embodiment I-106, wherein the oxidoreductase is glucose oxidase.
Embodiment I-109. The microneedle array of embodiment I-104, wherein the biorecognition element is cross-linked with an amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species.
Embodiment I-110. The microneedle array of embodiment I-109, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is at least one of formaldehyde, glyoxal, malonaldehyde, and succinaldehyde.
Embodiment I-111. The microneedle array of embodiment I-109, wherein the amine-condensing carbonyl chemical species is glutaraldehyde.
Embodiment I-112. The microneedle array of embodiment I-104, wherein the at least one sensing microneedle comprises at least one of a diffusion-limiting layer and a hydrophilic layer arranged over the biorecognition layer.
Embodiment I-113. The microneedle array of embodiment I-103, wherein the microneedle array further comprises at least one microneedle comprising a counter electrode configured to source or sink current to sustain an electrochemical reaction on the working electrode of at least one sensing microneedle.
Embodiment I-114. The microneedle array of embodiment I-103, wherein the plurality of microneedles comprises at least one microneedle comprising a reference electrode configured to provide a reference potential for the working electrode.
Embodiment I-115. The microneedle array of embodiment I-114, further comprising a conducting polymer arranged over the reference electrode.
Embodiment I-116. The microneedle array of embodiment I-115, wherein the conducting polymer comprises a dopant.
Embodiment I-117. The microneedle array of embodiment I-114, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal oxide with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-118. The microneedle array of embodiment I-117, wherein the metal oxide comprises iridium oxide.
Embodiment I-119. The microneedle array of embodiment I-114, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal salt with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-120. The microneedle array of embodiment I-119, wherein the metal salt comprises silver chloride.
Embodiment I-121. The microneedle array of embodiment I-103, wherein in at least one sensing microneedle, the tapered distal portion comprises an insulated distal apex and the working electrode is proximal to the insulated distal apex.
Embodiment I-122. The microneedle array of embodiment I-121, wherein a distal end of the working electrode is offset from the distal apex by an offset distance of at least about 10 μm, wherein the offset distance is measured along a longitudinal axis of the at least one sensing microneedle.
Embodiment I-123. The microneedle array of embodiment I-103, wherein in at least one sensing microneedle, a portion of the working electrode is recessed into the tapered distal portion.
Embodiment I-124. An analyte monitoring device comprising the microneedle array of embodiment I-103 and a wearable housing, wherein the microneedle array extends outwardly from the housing.
Embodiment I-125. The analyte monitoring device of embodiment I-124, wherein the housing comprises one or more indicator lights configured to communicate status information.
Embodiment I-126. The analyte monitoring device of embodiment I-124, wherein the housing encloses an electronics system comprising at least one of a processor and a wireless communication module.
Embodiment I-127. The analyte monitoring device of embodiment I-126, wherein the analyte monitoring device is a skin-adhered patch.
Embodiment I-128. A microneedle array for a body-worn analyte monitoring device, wherein the microneedle array comprises:
Embodiment I-129. The microneedle array of embodiment I-128, wherein at least a portion of the body portion has a first taper angle measured relative to the base and the distal apex has a second taper angle measured relative to the base, wherein the second taper angle is greater than the first taper angle.
Embodiment I-130. The microneedle array of embodiment I-128, wherein the second taper is between about 65 degrees and about 75 degrees.
Embodiment I-131. The microneedle array of embodiment I-130, wherein the first taper is between about 15 degrees and about 25 degrees.
Embodiment I-132. The microneedle array of embodiment I-128, wherein the planar surface is angled between about 75 degrees and 85 degrees measured relative to the base.
Embodiment I-133. The microneedle array of embodiment I-128, wherein the tapered distal portion comprises an insulated distal apex.
Embodiment I-134. An analyte monitoring device comprising the microneedle array of embodiment I-128 and a wearable housing, wherein the microneedle array is configurable to extend outwardly from the housing.
Embodiment I-135. The analyte monitoring device of embodiment I-134, wherein the analyte monitoring device is a patch.
Embodiment I-136. A method for monitoring a user, comprising:
Embodiment I-137. The method of embodiment I-136, wherein quantifying one or more analytes comprises quantifying a plurality of analytes in the dermal interstitial fluid using the plurality of working electrodes.
Embodiment I-138. The method of embodiment I-136, wherein the microneedle array comprises a plurality of sensing microneedles, each sensing microneedle comprising a respective working electrode.
Embodiment I-139. The method of embodiment I-138, wherein at least one sensing microneedle comprises a biorecognition layer arranged over the working electrode, wherein the biorecognition layer comprises an enzyme.
Embodiment I-140. The method of embodiment I-139, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises at least one of a diffusion-limiting layer and a hydrophilic layer arranged over the biorecognition layer.
Embodiment I-141. The method of embodiment I-136, wherein the microneedle array comprises at least one microneedle comprising a counter electrode configured to source or sink current to sustain an electrochemical reaction on at least one working electrode.
Embodiment I-142. The method of embodiment I-136, wherein the plurality of microneedles comprises at least one microneedle comprising a reference electrode configured to provide a reference potential for at least one working electrode.
Embodiment I-143. The method of embodiment I-142, further comprising a conducting polymer arranged over the reference electrode.
Embodiment I-144. The method of embodiment I-143, wherein the conducting polymer comprises a dopant.
Embodiment I-145. The method of embodiment I-142, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal oxide with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-146. The method of embodiment I-145, wherein the metal oxide comprises iridium oxide.
Embodiment I-147. The method of embodiment I-142, wherein the reference electrode comprises a metal salt with a stable electrode potential.
Embodiment I-148. The method of embodiment I-147, wherein the metal salt comprises silver chloride.
Embodiment I-149. The method of embodiment I-136, further comprising communicating status information indicative of the quantification of the one or more analytes.
Embodiment I-150. The method of embodiment I-149, wherein the microneedle array extends outwardly from a wearable housing and communicating status information comprises communicating status information via a user interface on the housing.
Embodiment I-151. The method of embodiment I-150, wherein communicating status information comprises selectively illuminating one or more indicator lights on the housing in accordance with an illumination mode corresponding to an analyte measurement status or a status of the integrated analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-152. The method of embodiment I-150, wherein communicating status information comprises activating a display corresponding to an analyte measurement status or a status of the integrated analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-153. A body-worn analyte monitoring device, comprising:
Embodiment I-154. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the user interface comprises one or more indicator lights configured to be selectively illuminated in accordance with an illumination mode corresponding to an analyte measurement status or a status of an integrated analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-155. The device of embodiment I-154, wherein at least one of the indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated to communicate a current analyte measurement level.
Embodiment I-156. The device of embodiment I-154, wherein the user interface comprises a plurality of indicator lights configured to be selectively illuminated in a progressive sequence to communicate an analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-157. The device of embodiment I-156, wherein the plurality of indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated in a first progressive sequence in a first direction to communicate a rising analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-158. The device of embodiment I-156, wherein the plurality of indicator lights is configured to be selectively illuminated in a second progressive sequence in a second direction to communicate a falling analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-159. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the user interface is further configured to communicate information indicative of a status of the analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-160. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the user interface comprises a display screen.
Embodiment I-161. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the analyte monitoring device is a skin-adhered patch.
Embodiment I-162. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the at least one microneedle comprises a tapered distal portion with an insulated distal apex, and an electrode on a surface of the tapered distal portion, wherein the electrode is located proximal to the insulated distal apex.
Embodiment I-163. The device of embodiment I-153, wherein the microneedle array comprises a plurality of working electrodes, wherein each working electrode is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other working electrode in the analyte monitoring device.
Embodiment I-164. A method for monitoring a user, comprising:
Embodiment I-165. The method of embodiment I-164, wherein communicating information comprises illuminating one or more indicator lights on the housing in accordance with an illumination mode corresponding to an analyte measurement status.
Embodiment I-166. The method of embodiment I-165, wherein communicating information comprises selectively illuminating at least one of the indicator lights to communicate a current analyte measurement level.
Embodiment I-167. The method of embodiment I-166, wherein communicating information comprises communicating the current analyte measurement level based on color of the illuminated indicator light, location of the illuminated indicator light, or both.
Embodiment I-168. The method of embodiment I-165, wherein communicating information comprises selectively illuminating a plurality of indicator lights on the housing in a progressive sequence to communicate an analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-169. The method of embodiment I-168, wherein communicating information comprises selectively illuminating the plurality of indicator lights in a first progressive sequence in a first direction to communicate a rising analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-170. The method of embodiment I-168, wherein communicating information comprises selectively illuminating the plurality of indicator lights in a second progressive sequence in a second direction to communicate a falling analyte measurement trend.
Embodiment I-171. The method of embodiment I-164, further comprising communicating information indicative of a status of the analyte monitoring device through the user interface.
Embodiment I-172. The method of embodiment I-164, further comprising accessing a dermal interstitial fluid of the user at a plurality of sensor locations with the analyte monitoring device, wherein quantifying one of more analytes comprises quantifying one or more analytes in the dermal interstitial fluid.
Embodiment I-173. The method of embodiment I-164, wherein the analyte monitoring device comprises a microneedle array comprising a plurality of working electrodes, wherein each working electrode is individually addressable and electrically isolated from every other working electrode in the analyte monitoring device.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed; obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, they thereby enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the following claims and their equivalents define the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/389,153, filed Jul. 29, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/058,275, filed Jul. 29, 2020, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4305401 | Reissmueller et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4323996 | Ganter | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4407295 | Steuer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4450842 | Zick et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4908117 | Kinlen et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4969468 | Byers et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5035711 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5131390 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5279543 | Glikfeld et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286364 | Yacynych et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5540828 | Yacynych | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5730714 | Guy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5766132 | Yasukawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5832410 | Lin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5869078 | Baudino | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5953306 | Yi | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6036055 | Mogadam et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6091975 | Daddona et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6132449 | Lum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132499 | Wong et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132755 | Eicher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139718 | Kurnik et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6269053 | Kawata et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284126 | Kurnik et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6364890 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6413396 | Yang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6465091 | Ou-Yang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471903 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6527762 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6551849 | Kenney | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6587705 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599408 | Chan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603987 | Whitson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6611707 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6793789 | Choi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6801041 | Karinka et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6814845 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6862466 | Ackerman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6908453 | Fleming et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7081195 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7097776 | Govinda Raju | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7132054 | Kravitz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7262068 | Roy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7343188 | Sohrab | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344499 | Prausnitz et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7366556 | Brister et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7415299 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7429333 | Chiou et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7456112 | Lee | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7471972 | Rhodes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7473244 | Frazier et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7493232 | Surina | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7534330 | Yu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7583990 | Goode, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599726 | Goode, Jr. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7613491 | Boock | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7645263 | Angel et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7715893 | Kamath et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7768408 | Reggiardo et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7778680 | Goode, Jr. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7797028 | Goode, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7811231 | Jin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7837654 | Shumate et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7885697 | Brister et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7905833 | Brister et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917186 | Kamath et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7949382 | Jina | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7959569 | Goode et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8005526 | Martin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8010174 | Goode, Jr. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8022292 | Arianpour et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8064977 | Boock et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8088321 | Ferguson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8094009 | Allen et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8108023 | Mir et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110079 | Gooding et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125331 | Allen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8130095 | Allen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8160665 | Mischler et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8160671 | Kamath et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8160834 | Liang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162901 | Gonnelli et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| RE43399 | Simpson et al. | May 2012 | E |
| 8216138 | McGarraugh | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8236368 | Jung et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8249684 | Kamath et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8257324 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280475 | Brister et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8280476 | Jina | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8284046 | Allen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8287453 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8308960 | Kälvesten et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8346335 | Harper et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8376945 | Hayter et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8386004 | Kamath et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8423114 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428678 | Kamath et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8452369 | Huys et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8463350 | Kamath et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8483793 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506529 | Yang | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8548553 | Kamath et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565848 | Brister et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8574165 | Marsh | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8617069 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| RE44695 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2014 | E |
| 8626257 | Li et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8637351 | Kälvesten et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8660628 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8708966 | Allen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8798799 | Deo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8815070 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8870763 | Yang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8882665 | Yang et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9008743 | Hayter et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9008745 | Pushpala et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9055901 | Brister et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9125625 | Wang et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9182368 | Pushpala et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9234872 | Homyk et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9248273 | Guvanasen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9332934 | Hayter et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9336423 | Goodnow et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9357951 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9386954 | Saini et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9387000 | Corrie et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9414778 | Mao et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9420965 | Brauker et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9532741 | Brauker et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9551698 | Huys et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9662056 | Budiman et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9737247 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9743870 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9743871 | Simpson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9757061 | Shults et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9770211 | Hayter et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9804114 | Rhodes et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9933387 | McCanna et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9958409 | Gerber et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10022076 | Hoss et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10039480 | Brauker et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10046114 | Biederman et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
| 10052055 | Li et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10092207 | Windmiller | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 10136846 | Wang et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10173042 | Pushpala et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10182748 | Catt et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10188333 | Kamath et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10228341 | Katsuki et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10299712 | Brister et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10327678 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10492708 | Windmiller | Dec 2019 | B1 |
| D875254 | Cooke et al. | Feb 2020 | S |
| 10549080 | Pushpala et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10610103 | Brister et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10709332 | Brister et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10743800 | Larvenz et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10820860 | Pushpala et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10881334 | Facchinetti et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10932700 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10983083 | Harding et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11020026 | Boock et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11035872 | Boutelle et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11045142 | Windmiller et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
| 11051724 | Pace et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11123532 | Pushpala et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11179068 | Pace et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 11197985 | Pushpala et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11272866 | Pushpala et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11272885 | Pushpala et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11291390 | Pushpala et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11331022 | Halac et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11359300 | Beer et al. | Jun 2022 | B1 |
| 11406818 | Windmiller | Aug 2022 | B2 |
| 11478194 | Windmiller et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 11596332 | Shults et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
| 11654270 | Mansfield, III et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
| D988160 | Morelock | Jun 2023 | S |
| 11672965 | Mansfield, III et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
| D996999 | Morelock | Aug 2023 | S |
| 20020004640 | Conn et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020688 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055704 | Scott et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072784 | Norman, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187556 | Shartle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030088166 | Say et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030095582 | Ackley | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100040 | Bonnecaze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104119 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135158 | Gonnelli | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208167 | Prausnitz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225360 | Eppstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030235817 | Bartkowiak et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040065158 | Schrepfer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082875 | Donoghue et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220625 | Silvestri et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050036020 | Li et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137536 | Gonnelli | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209565 | Yuzhakov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267440 | Herman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272989 | Shah et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060015061 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060016700 | Brister et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173259 | Flaherty et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264716 | Zander | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281121 | Unger et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070078445 | Malloy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070169533 | Shah et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070170054 | Wilsey | Jul 2007 | A2 |
| 20070213044 | Steingart et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282246 | Henley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009800 | Nickel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009801 | Nickel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027369 | Carter et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033269 | Zhang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097280 | Martin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097352 | Beck et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119707 | Stafford | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154107 | Jina | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156661 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213461 | Gill et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221408 | Hoarau et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234562 | Jina | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255434 | Hayter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080275327 | Faarbaek et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090057148 | Wieder et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066348 | Shin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069651 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069697 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084678 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088652 | Tremblay | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090623 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099427 | Jina et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101498 | Papadimitrakopoulos et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118672 | Gonnelli et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131778 | Jina et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143761 | Cantor et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152598 | Baek et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191616 | Lu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198118 | Hayter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090218239 | Gooding et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259118 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090294306 | Feldman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100006451 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100021637 | Revol et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025238 | Gottlieb et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030045 | Gottlieb et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049021 | Jina et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052892 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052897 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052898 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052915 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056873 | Allen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137779 | Seitz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100200538 | Petisce et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279377 | Shah et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286803 | Tillotson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110027127 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077490 | Simpson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105871 | Zimmermann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110140703 | Chiao et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224515 | Mir et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230736 | Tepper et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237925 | Yue et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247934 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110275918 | Yamashita et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110306853 | Black et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319787 | Lamoise et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120018302 | Shiraki et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120037515 | Solanki | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120067734 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120078071 | Bohm et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123232 | Najarian et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172692 | Tamada et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209244 | Gray | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277629 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323097 | Chowdhury | Dec 2012 | A9 |
| 20130053660 | Shieh | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130065257 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130135158 | Faraone et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144131 | Wang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158376 | Hayter et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225956 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281808 | Shieh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338746 | Guvanasen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345597 | Hagino et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140135679 | Mann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140259652 | Pushpala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275897 | Pushpala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275899 | Gottlieb et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275907 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303471 | Rajaraman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336487 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140378804 | Kalvesten et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150073238 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150126834 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208970 | Huang | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150243851 | Lee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276758 | Addisu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313527 | Renlund | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029937 | Sia et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160058342 | Maiz-Aguinaga et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095541 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095547 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160139069 | Wang | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160157764 | Di Palma | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160158514 | Stoeber et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160166184 | Teng et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160258945 | Malima et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160270704 | Deturk | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160296149 | Polsky et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160302687 | Lee et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160370377 | Ahmad | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003766 | Budiman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007813 | Negi | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170035331 | Parajape et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170108459 | Katsuki et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170127989 | Feldman et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128009 | Pushpala | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170164881 | Fujita | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170251959 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170251960 | Crouther et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170347925 | Wang et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180116572 | Simpson et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180140235 | Pushpala et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180279929 | Huang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180317820 | Pace et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180338712 | Cass et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190008425 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190022365 | Chowdhury et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190029577 | Koelker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190090811 | Reitz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190091455 | Reitz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190094169 | Shah et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190110724 | Kamath et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190125223 | Wang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190167167 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190209095 | Kamath et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190223795 | Patolsky et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190224712 | Petisce et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190241926 | Mckinlay et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190261907 | Brister et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190274599 | Polsky et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190274600 | Pesantez et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298210 | Bennet et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190307379 | Boock et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190309433 | Sattayasamitsathit et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190310219 | Boock | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190357827 | Li et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200029876 | Brister et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200037938 | Rong et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200101286 | Windmiller et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200121902 | Pushpala et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200178853 | Pushpala et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200187778 | Brister et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200214566 | Allen et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200254240 | Windmiller et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297997 | Windmiller et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305771 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200359949 | Brauker et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200405234 | Pushpala et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210045663 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210045665 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210045666 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210100452 | Brister et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210100504 | Pushpala et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210100505 | Pushpala et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210183508 | Parker et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210187286 | Windmiller et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210190719 | LaTour et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210345916 | Boock et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20210353229 | Pierart et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20210379370 | Windmiller et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20210386338 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20210393201 | Morelock et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20220031244 | Windmiller et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220047190 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220054813 | Pushpala et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220054814 | Pushpala et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220104773 | Lee et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220151516 | Wang et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220151518 | Pushpala et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220151519 | Pushpala et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220151558 | Pushpala et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
| 20220175278 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220175279 | Pushpala et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220175282 | Hoss et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220214300 | Wang et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220225901 | Chapman et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220233107 | Pushpala et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220249189 | Choi et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| 20220298291 | Shin et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220322975 | Baker et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
| 20220322977 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
| 20220370011 | Windmiller et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| 20230094419 | Mansfield, III et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230099617 | Mansfield, III et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230137258 | Windmiller | May 2023 | A1 |
| 20230190147 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
| 20230256220 | Mansfield, III et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101068591 | Nov 2007 | CN |
| 112617822 | Apr 2021 | CN |
| 1006868 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1 372 602 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 1792565 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 1 187 653 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 2 898 821 | Dec 2017 | EP |
| 3 381 370 | Oct 2018 | EP |
| H0222552 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| H-02-031741 | Feb 1990 | JP |
| H-07-275227 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 2003-038464 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003-038465 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2005-087613 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2006-510467 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2005-525141 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005-322591 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2008-512162 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008-540013 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 2017108763 | Jun 2017 | JP |
| 2019-205852 | Dec 2019 | JP |
| 2020-170011 | Oct 2020 | JP |
| 2022-501100 | Jan 2022 | JP |
| 10-2016-0108111 | Sep 2016 | KR |
| WO-0074763 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-0074763 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-2006060106 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006093422 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006116242 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006116242 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007040938 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2009034313 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009064164 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009064164 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009124095 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010014959 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010014959 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010022252 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010022252 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010045247 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010059276 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010120364 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010120364 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011056095 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012020332 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012020332 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012142625 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012142625 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013058879 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013058879 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014120114 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015073459 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO-2016189301 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO-2017129980 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017189707 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO-2018017196 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018071265 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018164886 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018170363 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO-2019156934 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019222615 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019239258 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| WO-2020023804 | Jan 2020 | WO |
| WO-2020023804 | Jan 2020 | WO |
| WO-2020117918 | Jun 2020 | WO |
| WO-2021015389 | Jan 2021 | WO |
| WO-2021025260 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| WO-2021086690 | May 2021 | WO |
| WO-2021118124 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| WO-2021118431 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| WO-2022026764 | Feb 2022 | WO |
| WO-2022066985 | Mar 2022 | WO |
| WO-2022066992 | Mar 2022 | WO |
| WO-2022090741 | May 2022 | WO |
| WO-2022136785 | Jun 2022 | WO |
| WO-2023055755 | Apr 2023 | WO |
| WO-2023064877 | Apr 2023 | WO |
| WO-2023133468 | Jul 2023 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 30, 2023 for European Application No. EP20881425.1, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/738,990, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/389,156, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 24 pages. |
| Swedish Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2023 for SE Application No. 2350067-1, 7 pages. |
| Abbot press release (2020). “New late-breaking data show use of abbott's Freestyle® Libre System significantly reduces HBA1C levels in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin or not,” 3 pages. |
| American Diabetes Association® Press Release (2020). “American Diabetes Association ® Applauds policymakers' Focus on Addressing High Costs of Insulin for Seven Million Americans,” 4 pages. |
| Bantie, J.P. et al. (1997). “Glucose measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus with dermal interstitial fluid,” J. Lab. Clin. Med. 130:436-441. |
| Beckies, G.L. et al. (2016). “Disparities in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes—United States, 1999-2002 and 2011-2014,” MMWR 65:1265-1269. |
| Cao, J. et al. (2017). “Validation of capillary blood analysis and capillary testing mode on the epoc Point of Care system,” Pract. Lab. Med. 9:24-27. |
| Castle, J.R. et al. (2012). “The accuracy benefit of multiple amperometric glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes Care 35:706-710. |
| Chang, H. et al. (2017). “A swellable microneedle patch to rapidly extract skin interstitial fluid for timely metabolic analysis,” Adv. Mater. 29:1702243. |
| Dexcom (2020). Analyst Day Presentation, 27 total pages. |
| Dexcom (2020). Analyst Day Presentation, 19 total pages. |
| Diabetes Care (2021). “7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021,” Diabetes Care 44(Supplement 1):S85-S99. |
| Donnelly, R.F. et al. (2007). “Microstructured Devices for Transdermal Drug Delivery and Minimally-Invasive Patient Monitoring,” Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation 1:195-200. |
| Extended European Search Report dated May 8, 2015, for EP Application No. 12 842 020.5, filed on Aug. 31, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2022, for EP Application No. 21 850 331.6, filed on Jul. 29, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Fang, M. et al. (2021). “Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018,” N. Engl. Med. 384:2219-2228. |
| Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/965,755, filed Dec. 10, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,536, filed Jul. 30, 2014, 34 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated May 18, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/687,145, filed Aug. 25, 2017, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,793, filed Apr. 24, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated May 21, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,398, filed Jul. 31, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,939, filed Oct. 24, 2018, 24 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/913,709, filed Mar. 6, 2018, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated May 9, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/389,153, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,398, filed Jul. 31, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/913,709, filed Mar. 6, 2018, 21 pages. |
| French, D.P. et al. (2008). “Original Article: Psychological Care Self-monitoring of blood glucose changed non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes patients' beliefs about diabetes and self-monitoring in a randomized trial,” Diav. Med. 25:1218-1228. |
| Gittard, S.D. et al. (2009). “Fabrication of Polymer Microneedles Using a Two-Photon Polymerization and Micromolding Process,” J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 3:304-311. |
| Grady, M. et al. (2017). “Examining the Impact of a Novel Blood Glucose Monitor With Color Range Indicator on Decision-Making in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes and its Association With Patient Numeracy Level,” JMIR Diabetes 2:e24. |
| Grady, M. et al. (2018). “Use of Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes in Comparison to Blood Glucose Meters Without Color (Accents Study),” J. Diab. Sci. Tech. 12:1211-1219. |
| Groenendaal, W. et al. (2008). “Modeling Glucose and Water Dynamics in Human Skin,” Diab. Tech. Therap. 10:283-293. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/043786, filed on Jul. 29, 2021, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2020, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/037379, filed on Jun. 12, 2020, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/056517, filed on Oct. 20, 2020, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040385, filed on Jul. 2, 2021, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Aug. 29, 2022, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/028196, filed on May 6, 2022, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Jun. 27, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/053544, filed on Aug. 31, 2012, 4 pages. |
| Jeon, G. et al. (2011). “Electrically Actuatable Smart Nanoporous Membrane for Pulsatile Drug Release,” Nano Lett. 11:1284-1288. |
| Jina, A et al. (2014). “Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor,” J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 8:483-487. |
| Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group (2008). “Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes,” N. Engl. Med. 359:1464-1476. |
| Karter, A.J. et al. (2021). “Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients with Insulin-Treated Diabetes,” JAMA 325:2273-2284. |
| Lhernould, M.S. et al. (2015). “Review of Patents for Microneedle Application Devices Allowing Fluid Injections Through the Skin,” Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation 9:146-157. |
| Malitesta et al. (1990). “Glucose fast-response amperometric sensor based on glucose oxidase immobilized in an electropolymerized poly(o-phenylenediamine) film,” Anal. Chem. 62:2735-2740. |
| Martens, T. et al. (2021). “Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin a Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA 325:2262-2272. |
| McClatchey, P.M. et al. (2019). “Fibrotic Encapsulation Is the Dominant Source of Continuous Glucose Monitor Delays,” Diabetes 68:1892-1901. |
| Miller, P.R. et al. (2011). “Integrated carbon fiber electrodes within hollow polymer microneedles for transdermal electrochemical sensing,” BioMicrofluidics 5(1):013415. |
| Mohan, A.M. (2017). “Continuous minimally-invasive alcohol monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 91:574-579. |
| Neerken, S. et al. (2004). “Characterization of age-related effects in human skin: A comparative study that applies confocal laser scanning microscopy and optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Optics 9:274-281. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/965,755, filed Dec. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,536, filed Jul. 30, 2014, 31 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/965,755, filed Dec. 10, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,536, filed Jul. 30, 2014, 32 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/687,145, filed Aug. 25, 2017, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,926, filed Sep. 2, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,793, filed Apr. 24, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,939, filed Oct. 24, 2018, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/913,709, filed Mar. 6, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,398, filed Jul. 31, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,939, filed Oct. 24, 2018, 20 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,398, filed Jul. 31, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/389,153, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/650,056, filed Feb. 4, 2022, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 13, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/913,709, filed Mar. 6, 2018, 20 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,398, filed Jul. 31, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/965,755, filed Dec. 10, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 12, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,536, filed Jul. 30, 2014, 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,926, filed Sep. 2, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/687,145, filed Aug. 25, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 25, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/961,793, filed Apr. 24, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 12, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/389,153, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Polonsky, W.H. et al. (2011). “A survey of blood glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: Are recommendations from health care professionals being followed?” Curr. Med. Res. & Opinion 27:31-37. |
| Rigla, M. et al. (2018). “Human Subcutaneous Tissue Response to Glucose Sensors: Macrophages Accumulation Impact on Sensor Accuracy,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 20:296-302. |
| Sachdeva, V. et al. (2011). “Microneedles and their applications,” Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation 5:95-132. |
| Sheikh, Z. et al. (2015). “Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials,” Materials 8:5671-5701. |
| Shi, T. et al. (2016). “Modeling and Measurement of Correlation between Blood and Interstitial Glucose Changes,” J. Diab. Res. vol. 2016, 9 pages. |
| Singh, T.R.R. et al. (2010). “Microporation techniques for enhanced delivery of therapeutic agents,” Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation 4:1-17. |
| Texas Instruments (Sep. 2007). Data sheet for a LMP2234 quad micropower, 1.6V, precision, operational amplifier with CMOS input, Sep. 2007, revised Mar. 2013, 31 total pages. |
| Windmiller, J.R. (2012). “Molecular scale biocomputing: An enzyme logic approach,” University of California, San Diego, A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering (Photonics), 78 total pages. |
| Windmiller, J.R. et al. (2011). “Bicomponent microneedle array biosensor for minimally-invasive glutamate monitoring,” Electroanalysis 23:2302-2309. |
| Windmiller, J.R. et al. (2011). “Microneedle array-based carbon paste amperometric sensors and biosensors,” Analyst 136:1846-1851. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 30, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/043786, filed on Jul. 29, 2021, 10 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 10, 2020, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/037379, filed on Jun. 12, 2020, 4 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 4, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/056517, filed on Oct. 20, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 30, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040385, filed on Jul. 2, 2021, 2 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 29, 2022, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/028196, filed on May 6, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 27, 2013, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/053544, filed on Aug. 31, 2012, 15 pages. |
| Yoon, Y. et al. (2013). “Fabrication of a Microneedle/CNT Hierarchical Micro/Nano Surface Electrochemical Sensor and Its In-Vitro Glucose Sensing Characterization,” Sensors 13:16672-16681. |
| Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 18/086,543, filed Dec. 21, 2022, 17 pages. |
| Al Hayek et al., “Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Novel Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Study” Cureus (2020) Oct. 27; 12(10): e11195. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11195. |
| Allen et al., “Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial” Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2008) Jun.; 80(3): 371-379. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2008.01.006. |
| Barrett et al., “Risk for Newly Diagnosed Diabetes 30 Days After SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Persons Aged 18 Years—United States, March 1, 2020-Jun. 28, 2021” MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2022) Jan. 14; 71(2):59-65. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7102e2. |
| Brown, C., “Design of Electronics for Wearable Electrochemical Sensors”, University of California, San Diego, Master's Thesis (2019), 48 pgs. |
| Centers for Disease Control, “National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020 Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States” (2020) 32 pages. |
| Dunkin et al., “Scarring occurs at a critical depth of skin injury: precise measurement in a graduated dermal scratch in human volunteers” Plast Reconstr Surg. (2007) May; 119(6):1722-1732. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258829.07399.f0. |
| Ehrhardt et al., “Behavior Modification in Prediabetes and Diabetes: Potential Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring ” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2019) Mar.; 13(2):271-275. |
| Ehrhardt et al., “Continuous Glucose Monitoring As a Behavior Modification Tool” Clin Diabetes. (2020) Apr.; 38(2):126-131. doi: 10.2337/cd19-0037. |
| Ehrhardt et al., “The Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2011) May; 5(3):668-675. |
| Fonda et al., “The Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2016) 10(4): 898-904. |
| Han et al., “The End of the Road for the YSI 2300 Analyzer: Where Do We Go Now?” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2020) 14(3):595-600. |
| Han et al., “The YSI 2300 Analyzer Replacement Meeting Report” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2020) 14(3):679-686. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 2, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/913,709, filed Mar. 6, 2018, 18 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 24, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 18/086,543, filed Dec. 21, 2022, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/367,274, filed Jul. 2, 2021, 27 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/073,331, filed Oct. 17, 2020, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 12, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/738,990, filed May 6, 2022, 7 pages. |
| Sharifi et al., “Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2016) 10(3):669-678. |
| Turner et al., “Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)” The Lancet (1998) Sep.; 352(9131):837-853. |
| Vigersky et al., “Short- and Long-Term Effects of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes” Diabetes Care (2012) Jan.; 35:32-38. |
| Wolicki et al., “Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases: Chapter 6: Vaccine Administration” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) 17 pages. |
| World Health Organization, “Diabetes”, Sep. 16, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Young et al., “Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial” JAMA Intern Med. (2017) Jul.; 177(7):920-929. |
| Office Action and Swedish Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2023, for SE Application No. 2251496-2, 8 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230074798 A1 | Mar 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63058275 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17389153 | Jul 2021 | US |
| Child | 17971415 | US |
