Patent Grant
8802901
The present invention relates generally to alcohol production from an esterification product, and in particular to producing ethanol through reducing an esterification product obtained by esterifying acetic acid.
Ethanol for industrial use is conventionally produced from petrochemical feed stocks, such as oil, natural gas, or coal, from feed stock intermediates, such as syngas, or from starchy materials or cellulose materials, such as corn or sugar cane. Conventional methods for producing ethanol from petrochemical feed stocks, as well as from cellulose materials, include the acid-catalyzed hydration of ethylene, methanol homologation, direct alcohol synthesis, and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Instability in petrochemical feed stock prices contributes to fluctuations in the cost of conventionally produced ethanol, making the need for alternative sources of ethanol production all the greater when feed stock prices rise. Starchy materials, as well as cellulose material, are converted to ethanol by fermentation. However, fermentation is typically used for consumer production of ethanol, which is suitable for fuels or human consumption. In addition, fermentation of starchy or cellulose materials competes with food sources and places restraints on the amount of ethanol that can be produced for industrial use.
Ethanol production via the reduction of alkanoic acids and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds, including esters, has been widely studied, and a variety of combinations of catalysts, supports, and operating conditions have been mentioned in the literature. Copper-iron catalysts for hydrogenolyzing esters to alcohols are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,198,592. A hydrogenolysis catalyst comprising nickel, tin, germanium and/or lead is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,130. A rhodium hydrogenolysis catalyst that also contains tin, germanium and/or lead is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,456,775.
Several processes that produce ethanol from acetates, including methyl acetate and ethyl acetate, are known in the literature.
WO8303409 describes producing ethanol by carbonylation of methanol be reaction with carbon monoxide in the presence of a carbonylation catalyst to form acetic acid which is then converted to an acetate ester followed by hydrogenolysis of the acetate ester formed to give ethanol or a mixture of ethanol and another alcohol which can be separated by distillation. Preferably the other alcohol or part of the ethanol recovered from the hydrogenolysis step is recycled for further esterification. Carbonylation can be effected using a CO/H2 mixture and hydrogenolysis can similarly be conducted in the presence of carbon monoxide, leading to the possibility of circulating gas between the carbonylation and hydrogenolysis zones with synthesis gas, preferably a 2:1H2:CO molar mixture being used as makeup gas.
WO2009063174 describes a continuous process for the production of ethanol from a carbonaceous feedstock. The carbonaceous feedstock is first converted to synthesis gas which is then converted to ethanoic acid, which is then esterified and which is then hydrogenated to produce ethanol.
WO2009009320 describes an indirect route for producing ethanol. Carbohydrates are fermented under homoacidogenic conditions to form acetic acid. The acetic acid is esterified with a primary alcohol having at least 4 carbon atoms and hydrogenating the ester to form ethanol.
US Pub. No. 20110046421 describes a process for producing ethanol comprising converting carbonaceous feedstock to syngas and converting the syngas to methanol. Methanol is carbonylated to ethanoic acid, which is then subjected to a two stage hydrogenation process. First the ethanoic acid is converted to ethyl ethanoate followed by a secondary hydrogenation to ethanol.
US Pub. No. 20100273229 describes a process for producing acetic acid intermediate from carbohydrates, such as corn, using enzymatic milling and fermentation steps. The acetic acid intermediate is acidified with calcium carbonate and the acetic acid is esterified to produce esters. Ethanol is produced by a hydrogenolysis reaction of the ester.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,884,253 describes a process for producing ethanol by converting syngas to methanol and catalytically converting the methanol into acetic acid. The acetic acid along with methanol is esterified to generate an acetate. The acetate is reduced with hydrogen to produce ethanol.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,414,161 describes a process for producing ethanol by a gas phase carbonylation of methanol with carbon monoxide followed by a hydrogenation. The carbonylation produces acetic acid and methyl acetate, which are separated and the methyl acetate is hydrogenated to produce ethanol in the presence of a copper-containing catalyst.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,497,967 describes a process for producing ethanol from methanol by first esterifying the methanol with acetic acid. The methyl acetate is carbonylated to produce acetic anhydride which is then reacted with one or more aliphatic alcohols to produce acetates. The acetates are hydrogenated to produce ethanol. The one or more aliphatic alcohols formed during hydrogenation are returned to the acetic anhydride esterification reaction.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,454,358 describes a process for producing ethanol from methanol. Methanol is carbonylated to produce methyl acetate and acetic acid. The methyl acetate is recovered and hydrogenated to produce methanol and ethanol. Ethanol is recovered by separating the methanol/ethanol mixture. The separated methanol is returned to the carbonylation process.
The need remains for improved processes for efficient ethanol production by reducing esters on a commercially feasible scale.
In a first embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process of reacting acetic acid and ethanol in a first reaction zone, recovering and condensing vapors formed in the first reaction zone in a distillation zone as a first distillate containing less than 15 wt. % water, separating at least a portion of the first distillate in a decanter into an organic phase comprising ethyl acetate and an aqueous phase comprising ethanol and water, reacting at least a portion of the organic phase with hydrogen in a second reaction zone to produce a crude reaction mixture, separating at least a portion of the crude reaction mixture in a second distillation zone into a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol, and directing at least a portion of the second distillate to the distillation zone as an azeotroping agent. Preferably, the second distillate comprises ethyl acetate.
In a second embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of producing ethanol comprising esterifying acetic acid and ethanol in a first reaction zone to produce a vapor phase esterification product comprising ethyl acetate, ethanol, water, and acetic acid, separating at least a portion of the vapor phase esterification product in a first column to yield a first distillate comprising ethyl acetate, ethanol, and water, and a first residue comprising acetic acid, biphasically separating at least a portion of the first distillate in a decanter into an organic phase comprising ethyl acetate and an aqueous phase comprising ethanol and water; and reacting at least a portion of the organic phase with hydrogen in a second reaction zone to produce a crude reaction mixture. The method further comprises separating at least a portion of the crude reaction mixture in a second column into a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol, and directing at least a portion of the second distillate to the first column as an azeotroping agent.
In a third embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of producing ethanol comprising reacting acetic acid and ethanol in a first column comprising a reaction zone, and distillation zone, recovering and condensing vapors formed in the reaction zone in the distillation zone as a first distillate, biphasically separating at least a portion of the first distillate in a decanter into an organic phase comprising ethyl acetate and an aqueous phase comprising ethanol and water; and reacting at least a portion of the organic phase with hydrogen in a hydrogenolysis reactor to produce a crude reaction mixture. The process further comprises separating at least a portion of the crude reaction mixture in a second column into a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol, and directing at least a portion of the second distillate to the distillation zone of the first column as an azeotroping agent.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the appended drawings, wherein like numerals designate similar parts.
The present invention relates to processes for producing ethanol from acetic acid through an acetate intermediate. In particular, the process involves esterifying ethanol and acetic acid to produce an esterification product and deriving an ester feed stream therefrom that is suitable for further reaction via hydrogenolysis to produce ethanol. The process involves at least two different reactions that may form minor amounts of impurities. The present invention provides an advantageous method of producing an ester feed from the esterification product so that the ester feed is suitable for hydrogenolysis. Pure ethyl acetate may be less cost effective in producing ethanol than acetic acid, and to provide a cost effective ester feed embodiments of the present invention simplify the esterification system and use minimal ethyl acetate separation. In addition, the present invention provides efficient separation processes for recovering ethanol after the hydrogenolysis of ethyl acetate. The processes of the present invention advantageously provide commercially feasible scale for producing ethanol.
The present invention comprises producing ethanol from acetic acid by esterifying the acetic acid to form an ester and reducing the ester to an alcohol. The embodiments of the present invention may also be integrated with methods for producing acetic acid and/or methods for producing ethanol as shown in
In particular the present invention is directed to a process for improving the production of the ester feed to efficiently produce ethanol from the hydrogenolysis process. One obstacle to producing ethanol from ethyl acetate, is the thought that pure ethyl acetate needs to be produced as the fed to ethanol. Pure ethyl acetate increases production costs and may not achieve desired improvements in the hydrogenolysis process. The present invention provides efficient ester production costs to result in improvements to the ethanol production. Controlling the esterification reactions and separation provide for an efficient production of ester feed stream that has a composition suitable to being reduced to ethanol.
For example, controlling the molar ratio of acetic acid to ethanol in the esterification may provide for a reduced separation process to provide a suitable ester feed stream. Preferably an excess molar ratio of acetic acid to ethanol, greater than 1.01:1, may be used. Prior hydrogenolysis methods demonstrated using ethyl acetate produced from excess molar ratio of ethanol.
For example, reducing the water content in the ester feed stream may improve the recovery of ethanol, and in particular anhydrous ethanol, from the hydrogenolysis reaction. This may reduce the number of distillation columns and separation capital required for the ethanol recovery. However, low finite water concentrations, e.g., less than 5 wt. %, in the ester feed stream may increase ethanol selectivity and/or ethanol productivity in the hydrogenolysis reaction while inhibiting the aldol condensation to higher alcohols, such as propanol and butanol. Not only does water function as a diluent in the hydrogenolysis reaction, but water may effectively slow down the reaction as water competitively binds to the catalyst active sites. Operating the esterification process in a manner that allows for low finite water concentrations reduces the costs for separating in the esterification process while providing an improved benefit in hydrogenolysis to ethanol.
I. Esterification
The esterification reactants, acids and alcohols, used in connection with the process of this invention may be derived from any suitable source including carbon source such as natural gas, petroleum, coal, biomass, and so forth. Acetic acid may be produced by several methods, including but not limited to, methanol carbonylation, acetaldehyde oxidation, ethylene oxidation, oxidative fermentation, and anaerobic fermentation.
A. Acetic Acid Sources
1. Carbonylation
In one embodiment, the production of ethanol may be integrated with such methanol carbonylation processes. Methanol carbonylation processes suitable for production of acetic acid are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,208,624; 7,115,772; 7,005,541; 6,657,078; 6,627,770; 6,143,930; 5,599,976; 5,144,068; 5,026,908; 5,001,259; and 4,994,608, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. A carbonylation system preferably comprises a reaction zone, which includes a reactor, a flasher and optionally a reactor recovery unit. In one embodiment, carbon monoxide is reacted with methanol in a suitable reactor, e.g., a continuous stirred tank reactor (“CSTR”) or a bubble column reactor. Preferably, the carbonylation process is a low water, catalyzed, e.g., rhodium-catalyzed, carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid, as exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,259, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The carbonylation reaction may be conducted in a homogeneous catalytic reaction system comprising a reaction solvent, methanol and/or reactive derivatives thereof, a Group VIII catalyst, at least a finite concentration of water, and optionally an iodide salt.
Suitable catalysts include Group VIII catalysts, e.g., rhodium and/or iridium catalysts. When a rhodium catalyst is utilized, the rhodium catalyst may be added in any suitable form such that the active rhodium catalyst is a carbonyl iodide complex. Exemplary rhodium catalysts are described in Michael Gauβ, et al., Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds: A Comprehensive Handbook in Two Volumes, Chapter 2.1, p. 27-200, (1st ed., 1996). Iodide salts optionally maintained in the reaction mixtures of the processes described herein may be in the form of a soluble salt of an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal or a quaternary ammonium or phosphonium salt. In certain embodiments, a catalyst co-promoter comprising lithium iodide, lithium acetate, or mixtures thereof may be employed. The salt co-promoter may be added as a non-iodide salt that will generate an iodide salt. The iodide catalyst stabilizer may be introduced directly into the reaction system. Alternatively, the iodide salt may be generated in-situ since under the operating conditions of the reaction system, a wide range of non-iodide salt precursors will react with methyl iodide or hydroiodic acid in the reaction medium to generate the corresponding co-promoter iodide salt stabilizer. For additional detail regarding rhodium catalysis and iodide salt generation, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,001,259; 5,026,908; and 5,144.068, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
When an iridium catalyst is utilized, the iridium catalyst may comprise any iridium-containing compound which is soluble in the liquid reaction composition. The iridium catalyst may be added to the liquid reaction composition for the carbonylation reaction in any suitable form which dissolves in the liquid reaction composition or is convertible to a soluble form. Examples of suitable iridium-containing compounds which may be added to the liquid reaction composition include: IrCl3, IrI3, IrBr3, [Ir(CO)2I]2, [Ir(CO)2Cl]2, [Ir(CO)2Br]2, [Ir(CO)2I2]−H+, [Ir(CO)2Br2]−H+, [Ir(CO)2I4]−H+, [Ir(CH3)I3(CO2)]−H+, Ir4(CO)12, IrCl3.3H2O, IrBr3.3H2O, iridium metal, Ir2O3, Ir(acac)(CO)2, Ir(acac)3, iridium acetate, [Ir3O(OAc)6(H2O)3][OAc], and hexachloroiridic acid [H2IrCl6]. Chloride-free complexes of iridium such as acetates, oxalates and acetoacetates are usually employed as starting materials. The iridium catalyst concentration in the liquid reaction composition may be in the range of 100 to 6000 wppm. The carbonylation of methanol utilizing iridium catalyst is well known and is generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,942,460; 5,932,764; 5,883,295; 5,877,348; 5,877,347 and 5,696,284, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
A halogen co-catalyst/promoter is generally used in combination with the Group VIII metal catalyst component. Methyl iodide is a preferred halogen promoter. Preferably, the concentration of the halogen promoter in the reaction medium ranges from 1 wt. % to 50 wt. %, and more preferably from 2 wt. % to 30 wt. %.
The halogen promoter may be combined with the salt stabilizer/co-promoter compound. Particularly preferred are iodide or acetate salts, e.g., lithium iodide or lithium acetate.
Other promoters and co-promoters may be used as part of the catalytic system of the present invention as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,348, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Suitable promoters are selected from ruthenium, osmium, tungsten, rhenium, zinc, cadmium, indium, gallium, mercury, nickel, platinum, vanadium, titanium, copper, aluminum, tin, antimony, and are more preferably selected from ruthenium and osmium. Specific co-promoters are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,627,770, which is incorporated herein by reference.
A promoter may be present in an effective amount up to the limit of its solubility in the liquid reaction composition and/or any liquid process streams recycled to the carbonylation reactor from the acetic acid recovery stage. When used, the promoter is suitably present in the liquid reaction composition at a molar ratio of promoter to metal catalyst of 0.5:1 to 15:1, preferably 2:1 to 10:1, more preferably 2:1 to 7.5:1. A suitable promoter concentration is 400 to 5000 wppm.
In one embodiment, the temperature of the carbonylation reaction in the reactor is preferably from 150° C. to 250° C., e.g., from 150° C. to 225° C., or from 150° C. to 200° C. The pressure of the carbonylation reaction is preferably from 1 to 20 MPa, preferably 1 to 10 MPa, most preferably 1.5 to 5 MPa. Acetic acid is typically manufactured in a liquid phase reaction at a temperature from about 150° C. to about 200° C. and a total pressure from about 2 to about 5 MPa.
In one embodiment, reaction mixture comprises a reaction solvent or mixture of solvents. The solvent is preferably compatible with the catalyst system and may include pure alcohols, mixtures of an alcohol feedstock, and/or the desired carboxylic acid and/or esters of these two compounds. In one embodiment, the solvent and liquid reaction medium for the (low water) carbonylation process is preferably acetic acid.
Water may be formed in situ in the reaction medium, for example, by the esterification reaction between methanol reactant and acetic acid product. In some embodiments, water is introduced to the reactor together with or separately from the other components of the reaction medium. Water may be separated from the other components of the reaction product withdrawn from reactor and may be recycled in controlled amounts to maintain the required concentration of water in the reaction medium. Preferably, the concentration of water maintained in the reaction medium ranges from 0.1 wt. % to 16 wt. %, e.g., from 1 wt. % to 14 wt. %, or from 1 wt. % to 3 wt. % of the total weight of the reaction product.
The desired reaction rates are obtained even at low water concentrations by maintaining in the reaction medium an ester of the desired carboxylic acid and an alcohol, desirably the alcohol used in the carbonylation, and an additional iodide ion that is over and above the iodide ion that is present as hydrogen iodide. An example of a preferred ester is methyl acetate. The additional iodide ion is desirably an iodide salt, with lithium iodide (LiI) being preferred. It has been found, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,259, that under low water concentrations, methyl acetate and lithium iodide act as rate promoters only when relatively high concentrations of each of these components are present and that the promotion is higher when both of these components are present together. The absolute concentration of iodide ion is not a limitation on the usefulness of the present invention.
In low water carbonylation, the additional iodide over and above the organic iodide promoter may be present in the catalyst solution in amounts ranging from 2 wt. % to 20 wt. %, e.g., from 2 wt. % to 15 wt. %, or from 3 wt. % to 10 wt. %; the methyl acetate may be present in amounts ranging from 0.5 wt. % to 30 wt. %, e.g., from 1 wt. % to 25 wt. %, or from 2 wt. % to 20 wt. %; and the lithium iodide may be present in amounts ranging from 5 wt. % to 20 wt. %, e.g., from 5 wt. % to 15 wt. %, or from 5 wt. % to 10 wt. %. The catalyst may be present in the catalyst solution in amounts ranging from 200 wppm to 2000 wppm, e.g., from 200 wppm to 1500 wppm, or from 500 wppm to 1500 wppm.
Alternatively, acetic acid in vapor form may be taken directly as crude product from the flash vessel of a methanol carbonylation unit of the class described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,078, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The crude vapor product, for example, may be fed directly to the esterification reaction zone of the present invention without the need for condensing the acetic acid and light ends or removing water, saving overall processing costs.
2. Direct from Syngas
As petroleum and natural gas prices fluctuate becoming either more or less expensive, methods for producing acetic acid and intermediates such as methanol and carbon monoxide from alternate carbon sources have drawn increasing interest. In particular, when petroleum is relatively expensive, it may become advantageous to produce acetic acid from synthesis gas (“syngas”) that is derived from more available carbon sources. U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,352, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference, for example, teaches a method of retrofitting a methanol plant for the manufacture of acetic acid. By retrofitting a methanol plant, the large capital costs associated with CO generation for a new acetic acid plant are significantly reduced or largely eliminated. All or part of the syngas is diverted from the methanol synthesis loop and supplied to a separator unit to recover CO, which is then used to produce acetic acid. In a similar manner, hydrogen for the hydrogenolysis step may be supplied from syngas.
In some embodiments, some or all of the raw materials may be derived partially or entirely from syngas. For example, the acetic acid may be formed from methanol and carbon monoxide, both of which may be derived from syngas. The syngas may be formed by partial oxidation reforming or steam reforming, and the carbon monoxide may be separated from syngas. Similarly, hydrogen that is used in the step of hydrogenating the ethyl acetate to form the crude reaction mixture may be separated from syngas. The syngas, in turn, may be derived from variety of carbon sources. The carbon source, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of natural gas, oil, petroleum, coal, biomass, and combinations thereof. Syngas or hydrogen may also be obtained from bio-derived methane gas, such as bio-derived methane gas produced by landfills or agricultural waste.
3. Fermentation to Acetic Acid
In another embodiment, the acetic acid used in the esterification may be formed from the fermentation of biomass. The fermentation process preferably utilizes an acetogenic process or a homoacetogenic microorganism to ferment sugars to acetic acid producing little, if any, carbon dioxide as a by-product. The carbon efficiency for the fermentation process preferably is greater than 70%, greater than 80% or greater than 90% as compared to conventional yeast processing, which typically has a carbon efficiency of about 67%. Optionally, the microorganism employed in the fermentation process is of a genus selected from the group consisting of Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Moorella, Thermoanaerobacter, Propionibacterium, Propionispera, Anaerobiospirillum, and Bacteriodes, and in particular, species selected from the group consisting of Clostridium formicoaceticum, Clostridium butyricum, Moorella thermoacetica, Thermoanaerobacter kivui, Lactobacillus delbrukii, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, Propionispera arboris, Anaerobiospirillum succinicproducens, Bacteriodes amylophilus and Bacteriodes ruminicola. Optionally in this process, all or a portion of the unfermented residue from the biomass, e.g., lignans, may be gasified to form hydrogen that may be used in the hydrogenolysis step of the present invention. Exemplary fermentation processes for forming acetic acid are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,509,180; 6,927,048; 7,074,603; 7,507,562; 7,351,559; 7,601,865; 7,682,812; and 7,888,082, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. See also U.S. Pub. Nos. 2008/0193989 and 2009/0281354, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Examples of biomass include, but are not limited to, agricultural wastes, forest products, grasses, and other cellulosic material, timber harvesting residues, softwood chips, hardwood chips, tree branches, tree stumps, leaves, bark, sawdust, off-spec paper pulp, corn, corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, miscanthus, animal manure, municipal garbage, municipal sewage, commercial waste, grape pumice, almond shells, pecan shells, coconut shells, coffee grounds, grass pellets, hay pellets, wood pellets, cardboard, paper, plastic, and cloth. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,884,253, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Another biomass source is black liquor, a thick, dark liquid that is a byproduct of the Kraft process for transforming wood into pulp, which is then dried to make paper. Black liquor is an aqueous solution of lignin residues, hemicellulose, and inorganic chemicals.
U.S. Pat. No. RE 35,377, also incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for the production of methanol by conversion of carbonaceous materials such as oil, coal, natural gas and biomass materials. The process includes hydrogasification of solid and/or liquid carbonaceous materials to obtain a process gas which is steam pyrolized with additional natural gas to form synthesis gas. The syngas is converted to methanol which may be carbonylated to acetic acid. The method likewise produces hydrogen which may be used in connection with this invention as noted above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,111, which discloses a process for converting waste biomass through gasification into synthesis gas, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,754, which discloses a method for the production of a hydrogen-containing gas composition, such as a synthesis gas including hydrogen and carbon monoxide, are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
4. Acetic Acid Feed
The acetic acid feed stream that is fed to the esterification step may also comprise other carboxylic acids and anhydrides, acetaldehyde, and acetone. In one aspect, the acetic acid feed stream comprises one or more of the compounds selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, propionic acid, acetic anhydride, acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate, diethyl acetal, and mixtures thereof. These other compounds may also be hydrogenated in the processes of the present invention. Water may also be present, generally in amounts of less than 10 wt. %, in the acetic acid feed.
B. Ethanol Feed
The alcohol feed stream fed to the esterification step may comprise methanol, ethanol, and/or butanol. In one aspect, the feed stream primarily comprises ethanol. Ethanol may be obtained from a widely used bio-fermentation process and/or wood pyrolysis. Ethanol may also be produced by hydrating ethylene. In some embodiments, ethanol may be obtained by reducing acetic acid with hydrogen to ethanol in the presence of a catalyst, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,863,489, and 7,608,744, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as described herein, a portion of the ethanol may be obtained from the products of the hydrogenolysis reactor.
In one embodiment, the ethanol feed stream may also comprise minor amounts of C1 to C4 alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, acetals, hemiacetals, ethers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the ethanol feed stream may comprise low concentrations of water, e.g., less than 10 wt. % or less than 5 wt. %.
C. Esterification Reaction
The process of the present invention comprises an esterification zone 101 and a hydrogenolysis zone 102 as shown in
The formation of the esterification product in the esterification equilibrium reaction may be enhanced by the presence of a catalyst. A variety of homogeneous or heterogeneous acid catalysts may also be employed within the scope of this invention. The catalyst should be stable at the desired reaction temperature. Suitable catalysts include, without limitation, sulfuric acid, sulfonic acid, alkyl sulfonic acids, and aromatic sulfonic acids. Alkyl sulfonic and aromatic sulfonic acids may include methane sulfonic acid, benzene sulfonic acid and p-toluene sulfonic acid. In one embodiment, an ion exchange resin, e.g., Amberlyst™ 15, Amberlyst™ 36, Amberlyst™ 70, or Purolite™ CT179, may be used. Sulfuric acid, acidic zeolites, or heteropoly acids can also be used within the scope of the invention.
1. Ethanol to Acetic Acid Molar Ratio
In either the vapor or liquid phase reactions, although ethanol and acetic acid may be fed in equimolar amounts, in commercial ester production processes ethanol may be employed in excess molar amounts in the reaction mixture. In one aspect, because incomplete conversion of acetic acid in the esterification is less significant for purposes of the present invention, in some embodiments, it may be preferably to use an excess molar ratio of acetic acid. In one embodiment, the molar ratio of acetic acid to ethanol is greater than 1.01:1, e.g., greater than 1.05:1, greater than 1.2:1 or greater than 1.5:1. In terms of ranges, the molar ratio of acetic acid to ethanol may be from 1.01:1 to 5:1, e.g., from 1.01:1 to 3:1, from 1.05:1 to 3:1 or from 1.5:1 to 2.8:1. Without being bound by theory, the use of an excess molar amount of acetic acid, particularly under vapor phase esterification conditions, may desirably reduce formation of diethyl ether. A molar ratio that is greater than 1.5:1 under vapor phase conditions, at reaction temperatures of less than 130° C., may result in substantially no formation of diethyl ether.
Additionally, the use of excess acetic acid may allow for higher conversion rates of ethanol in the esterification reactor. In one embodiment, at least 75% of the ethanol fed to the esterification reactor is converted to ethyl acetate, e.g., at least 90% or at least 95%.
2. Vapor Phase
Vapor phase esterification may be carried out in a closely-coupled reactor 103 and distillation column 104 in the esterification zone 101 as shown in
In another embodiment, the reaction may be carried out in the vapor phase using a heterogeneous reactive distillation column. One or more reactors may be connected with the column.
Acetic acid feed stream in line 105 and ethanol feed stream in line 106, respectively, are fed to a vaporizer 107 to create a vapor feed stream in line 108 that is directed to reactor 103. In one embodiment, prior to feeding into vaporizer 107, the acetic acid feed stream and/or ethanol feed stream may be preheated. Vaporizer 107 may be fed with liquid reactants or vapor reactants, and preferably all the reactants are in the liquid phase. The acetic acid and ethanol may be vaporized at or near the reaction temperature. For reactions conducted in the vapor phase, the temperature should be controlled in the system such that it does not fall below the dew point of acetic acid. In one embodiment, the acetic acid may be vaporized at the boiling point of acetic acid at the particular pressure, and then the vaporized acetic acid may be further heated to the reactor inlet temperature. In another embodiment, the acetic acid is mixed with other gases before vaporizing, followed by heating the mixed vapors up to the reactor inlet temperature.
As shown in
In one embodiment, vapor feed stream 108 may be further preheated prior to being fed to reactor 103. The process may control the vapor-phase esterification reaction temperature by super-heating the vaporized feed in line 108 using a heat exchanger that is used to control the reactor inlet temperature.
Any feed that is not vaporized is removed from vaporizer 107 and may be recycled or discarded. In one embodiment, there may be a relatively small blowdown stream 109 that comprises heavy compounds that may be withdrawn from vaporizer 107. Blowdown stream 109 may be reboiled as necessary. The mass flow ratio of the vapor feed stream 108 to blowdown stream 109 may be greater than 5:1, e.g., greater than 50:1, or greater than 500:1. When ethanol from hydrogenolysis zone 102 is recycled to esterification zone 101, the ethanol may contain heavy compounds such as higher alcohols and/or higher acetates. These heavy compounds may buildup in the blowdown stream 109.
Although vaporizer 107 preferably comprises little or no acidic catalyst, due to the vaporization conditions, some acetic acid and ethanol may be esterified. Thus, vaporizer 107 may be a non-catalyzed reactor that produces ethyl acetate. Thus, vapor feed stream in line 108 in addition to containing acetic acid and ethanol, may also comprise minor amounts of ethyl acetate, e.g., in an amount of less than 15 wt. % based on the total weight of the vapor feed stream in line 108, e.g., less than 10 wt. % or less than 5 wt. %. In addition to the minor amounts of ethyl acetate, in one embodiment, vapor feed stream in line 108 may comprise a weight majority of acetic acid, e.g., at least 40 wt. %, at least 50 wt. % or at least 60 wt. %.
In one optional embodiment, there may be a liquid reactor (not shown) prior to vaporizer 107. The liquid reactor may contain a suitable acidic catalyst. Acetic acid feed stream in line 105 and ethanol feed stream in line 106 may be fed to the liquid reactor which produces an intermediate mixture that is vaporized. The additional feeds of acetic acid and ethanol may be fed with the intermediate mixture to vaporizer 107.
Vapor feed stream in line 108 is shown as being directed to the top of reactor 103 in
The vapor-phase esterification reaction temperature is effected by the steady state composition and pressure, and typically may range from 50° C. to 200° C., e.g., from 80° C. to 190° C., from 125° C. to 175° C. The esterification process may be operated at atmospheric pressure but it is preferably operated at super-atmospheric pressure, e.g., from 105 to 700 kPa, from 110 to 350 kPa or from 120 to 300 kPa.
During the esterification process, an esterification product is withdrawn in vapor phase, preferably continuously, from reactor 103 via line 110. As shown in Table 1, the esterification product may comprise the following exemplary compositions.
The amounts indicated as less than (<) in the tables throughout the present specification are preferably not present and if present may be present in trace amounts or in amounts greater than 0.0001 wt. %.
The trace impurities, such as n-butanol, 2-butanol, and/or iso-propanol, may be present in small amounts, if at all. Generally these other alcohols are also esterified.
In one embodiment, esterification product in line 110 is fed directly to a first column 104, also referred to as an “azeotrope column.” In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, an optional sidestream 111 from a lower portion of first column 104 which may be enriched in ethyl acetate as compared to first residue 113, may be withdrawn and returned to vaporizer 107. Optional sidestream 111 may be withdrawn as a liquid or vapor and is preferably not reboiled in first column 104. Optional sidestream 111 may provide energy necessary to drive vaporization in vaporizer 107 and thus reduce or eliminate the need for a reboiler.
The temperature of first column 104 at atmospheric pressure may vary. In one embodiment, the first residue exiting in line 113 preferably is at a temperature from 90° C. to 160° C., e.g., from 95° C. to 145° C. or from 100° C. to 140° C. The temperature of the first distillate exiting in line 112 preferably is from 60° C. to 125° C., e.g., from 85° C. to 110° C. or from 90° C. to 105° C. Column 104 may operate at an increased pressure, i.e., greater than atmospheric pressure. The pressure of column 104 may range from 105 to 510 kPa, from 110 to 475 kPa or from 120 to 375 kPa
Exemplary components of the first distillate, and residue compositions for first column 104 are provided in Table 2 below. It should also be understood that the overhead stream and residue may also contain other components, not listed, such as components derived from the feed. For convenience, the residue of the first column may also be referred to as the “first residue.” The distillates or residues of the other columns may be referred to with similar numeric modifiers (second, third, etc.) in order to distinguish them from one another, but such modifiers should not be construed as requiring any particular separation order.
3. Liquid Phase Esterification
In another embodiment, the esterification may be carried in the liquid phase in a distillation column 115 as shown in
In
As indicated above, it may be preferred to maintain an excess molar amount of acetic acid in reaction zone 116. In general, the acetic acid concentration in the reaction zone 116 may range from 30 to 90 wt. %, e.g., from 50 to 80 wt. %, or from 60 and 70 wt. %. Optionally, a heavy ends stream may be purged from the bottom of the reaction zone 116.
In a continuous process, a corrosion resistant distillation column 115, constructed from a corrosion resistant material, such as 316 stainless steel, may be used. Operation of homogeneous strong acid catalyzed esterification reactions in the base section of the distillation column 115 may requires the use of more corrosion resistant metallurgies. Higher temperatures further increase corrosion rates and, therefore, may require the use of even more corrosion resistant materials of construction. Feed flows continuously through reaction zone 116 and the esterification product simultaneously leaves the reaction zone 116 as a vapor and enters the distillation zone 117. Distillation zone 117 may comprise a series of 20 to 100 trays, e.g., from 30 to 80 trays or from 40 to 60 trays. The liquid-phase esterification reaction temperature is affected by the steady state composition and pressure, and the reaction zone 116 typically may range from 70° C. to 160° C., e.g., from 100° C. to 150° C., from 110° C. to 140° C. The esterification process may be operated at atmospheric pressure but it is preferable to operate reaction zone 116 at super-atmospheric pressure, e.g., from 101 to 300 kPa, from 110 to 250 kPa or from 120 to 200 kPa. One of skill in the art will recognize that various temperatures can be used depending on the pressure maintained in the reaction zone 116, and the specific ester being produced and the nature of reactants.
After reaction and distillation, the resulting vapors are removed from the top of the distillation column 115 as a first distillate in line 118. First distillate may comprise ethyl acetate, ethanol, water, and minor amounts of acetic acid. The amount of acetic acid in first distillate is preferably less than the amount of ethanol. The acetic acid concentration may be less than 600 wppm, e.g., less than 200 wppm or less than 50 wppm. Advantageously, low amounts of acetic acid in the first distillate may reduce the need to further remove acetic acid from the hydrogenolysis product.
Although esterification produces a mole of water for each mole of ethyl acetate, to control water in the esterification process a first distillate from distillation column 115 may contain a lower concentration of water than that formed by the esterification reaction.
Ethyl acetate/water may form an azeotrope having about 8.1 wt. % water and a boiling point around 70.4° C. at atmospheric pressure. In addition, ethyl acetate/ethanol/water may form an azeotrope having 8.4 wt. % ethanol and 9 wt. % water that has a boiling point around 70.2° C. at atmospheric pressure. For purposes of the present invention, the ethyl acetate/water azeotrope is primarily present in distillation zone 117 due to the relatively smaller ethanol concentrations in distillation zone 117.
In one embodiment, the water concentration in the first distillate is less than the azeotropic amount of water and ethyl acetate, e.g., less than about 10 wt. %, or less than about 9 wt. %. When the esterification reaction produces more water than the azeotropic amount, an azeotropic agent, such as ethyl acetate, may be added to distillation column 115. In one embodiment, about half of the water in the azeotrope of ethyl acetate and water is accounted for by the water from the esterification reaction. Adding liquid ethyl acetate with a lower water concentration may provide a net azeotroping capacity. In the production of pure ethyl acetate, a portion of the purified ethyl acetate may be fed to distillation column 115 to maintain a water concentration of less than about 10 wt. %. For purposes of the present invention, ethyl acetate recovered in the purification of the esterification product and/or ethyl acetate recovered in the purification of the hydrogenolysis product may be used as the azeotropic agent. In one embodiment, the azeotropic agent is a dry ethyl acetate composition that contains substantially no water.
The temperature of the first distillate exiting from column 115 preferably is from 60° C. to 125° C., e.g., from 70° C. to 115° C. or from 75° C. to 105° C. First distillate in line 118 may be condensed using refrigeration, cooling water, and/or an air cooled condenser, operating at a temperature of from 0° C. to 55° C., and further separated to recover an ester feed stream that is directed to hydrogenolysis zone 102 as described further herein.
4. Separation of Esterification Product
First distillate in line 112 from the vapor esterification in
Exemplary organic phase and aqueous phase compositions are provided in Table 3 below. These compositions may vary depending on the type of esterification reaction, e.g., liquid phase or vapor phase. Regardless of the type of esterification reaction, it is preferred that each phase contains very low concentrations of acetic acid, e.g., less than 600 wppm, e.g., less than 200 wppm or less than 50 wppm. In one embodiment, the organic phase comprises less than 6 wt. % ethanol and less than 5 wt. % water.
In some embodiments, an organic phase comprising ethyl acetate is removed from decanter 120 via line 122. As shown in
An aqueous phase comprising water is also removed from decanter 120 via line 124 and sent to recovery column 131, also referred to as the second column. Although a majority of the ethyl acetate is separated in the organic phase, a minor amount, e.g., less than 1%, or less than 0.75%, of the ethyl acetate in the decanter 120 may be withdrawn in the aqueous phase in line 124. In one embodiment, it is desirable to maximize ethyl acetate efficiency by recovering the ethyl acetate to be used as an azeotroping agent in first column 104 or to increase the ethyl acetate to ethanol in hydrogenolysis zone 102. Optionally, a portion of the aqueous phase from the decanter 120 is purged and removed from the system.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to further process the organic phase prior to entering hydrogenolysis zone 102. This may allow feeding a non-aliquot portion of the organic phase to hydrogenolysis zone 102. As shown in
a. Purification Column
Purification column 125 removes ethanol and water from ethyl acetate in the organic phase. In particular, column 125 may purify ethyl acetate in the organic phase by removing one or more azeotropes of ethyl acetate. Depending on the composition of organic phase and the phasing in decanter 120, a purification column 125 may be advantageous when the ethanol and/or water concentration in the organic phase exceeds 5 wt. %, e.g., exceeds 8 wt. % or exceeds 10 wt. %. Any water fed to hydrogenolysis zone 102 would be expected to pass through and would need to be removed from the final ethanol if desired. Additional ethanol fed to hydrogenolysis reactor 140 may have less of an impact, but may create capacity restraints and bottlenecking.
Purification column 125 may be a tray or packed column. In one embodiment, purification column 125 is a tray column having from 10 to 80 trays, e.g., from 20 to 60 trays or from 30 to 50 trays. Although the temperature and pressure of purification column 125 may vary, when at 65 kPa the temperature of the overhead preferably is from 70° C. to 100° C., e.g., from 75° C. to 95° C. or from 80° C. to 90° C. The temperature at the base of the purification column 125 preferably is from 80° C. to 110° C., e.g., from 85° C. to 105° C. or from 90° C. to 100° C. In other embodiments, the pressure of purification column 125 may be from 10 kPa to 600 kPa, e.g., from 20 kPa to 400 kPa or from 20 kPa to 300 kPa.
Ethyl acetate is preferably removed as a residue stream, i.e. ester-enriched stream, in line 126 and a portion thereof may be fed to a reboiler. In some embodiments, ethyl acetate may be removed as a sidestream (not shown) from a point near the base of column 125 and a residue may be removed and purged. Residue stream in line 126 preferably has a low concentration of ethanol and/water, which may be less than 2 wt. % individually or collectively, e.g., less than 1 wt. % or less than 0.1 wt. %. The residue stream in line 126 may be directly fed as the ester feed stream to hydrogenolysis zone 102. In one embodiment, residue stream in line 126 has a higher temperature than the organic phase 122, and thus it may be advantageous to directly feed residue stream in line 126 to hydrogenolysis zone 102 because no further preheating is required. In one exemplary embodiment, residue stream in line 126 may have a temperature that is at least 70° C., e.g., at least 80° C. or 85° C. Advantageously, removing impurities in organic phase may efficiently use energy in the system and reduce capital expenses for additional utility heaters.
The distillate of the purification column 125 is an ethyl acetate-ethanol-water stream and is preferably condensed in line 127 by passing through subcooler before being fed to a decanter 128, in which an organic phase is separated from an aqueous phase. A portion or all of the organic phase in line 129, which comprises ethyl acetate and/or ethanol, may be refluxed to the top of purification column 125. In one embodiment, the reflux ratio is from 0.25:1 to 1:0.25, e.g., from 0.5:1 to 1:0.5 or from 1:1 to 1:2. All or a portion of remaining organic phase in line 129 may also be returned to vaporizer 107, first column 104, and/or overhead decanter 120 as shown in
In some optional embodiments, not shown, ethyl acetate may be removed as a sidestream near the base of purification column 125. When ethyl acetate is removed as a side stream, the bottoms stream from purification column 125 is preferably withdrawn and may be recycled to vaporizer 107 or first column 104 as an azeotroping agent. The optional bottoms stream comprising ethyl acetate acts as an azeotroping agent to assist in the removal of water produced in reactor 103. In one embodiment, a conductivity meter may be used to monitor the acetic acid concentration in the organic phase. When the concentration of acetic acid is greater than a tolerable level for the hydrogenolysis reactor, a purification column 125 may be used to remove acetic acid in the optional bottom stream.
The aqueous phase may be withdrawn from decanter 128 via line 130 and preferably is fed to recovery column 131. The aqueous phases in lines 124 and/or 130 may be co-fed to recovery column 131 or separately fed to recovery column 131. In one embodiment a portion of the aqueous phase of decanter 128 in line 130 is purged and removed from the system.
b. Recovery Column
Recovery column 131 is operated to remove a significant portion of any organic content in aqueous phase in line 124 prior to purging the water. Recovery column 131 may also remove organics from the aqueous phase in line 130 from the purification column 125. Recovery column 131 may be a tray or packed column. In one embodiment, recovery column 131 is a tray column having from 10 to 80 trays, e.g., from 20 to 75 trays or from 30 to 60 trays. Although the temperature and pressure of recovery column 131 may vary, when at atmospheric pressure the temperature of the overhead preferably is from 60° C. to 85° C., e.g., from 65° C. to 80° C. or from 70° C. to 75° C. The temperature at the base of recovery column 131 preferably is from 92° C. to 118° C., e.g., from 97° C. to 113° C. or from 100° C. to 108° C. In other embodiments, the pressure of recovery column 131 may be from 1 kPa to 300 kPa, e.g., from 10 kPa to 200 kPa or from 10 kPa to 150 kPa.
In one embodiment, any of the feeds to recovery column 131 may be at the top of the tower, i.e. near or into the reflux line. This keeps a sufficient loading on the trays such that the column operates as a stripping tower.
Exemplary second distillate and second residue compositions of recovery column 131 are provided in Table 4 below.
The second distillate of recovery column 131 in line 132 may be condensed and refluxed, as necessary, to the top of recovery column 131. Depending on the composition of overhead in line 132, the overhead may be returned to vaporizer 107, first column 104, or co-fed with a portion of the organic phase in line 122 to hydrogenolysis zone 102. When the second distillate in line 132 is fed to hydrogenolysis zone 102, it is preferable to control the total concentration of water such that it is less than 8 wt. % based on the total feed to hydrogenolysis zone 102, e.g., less than 5 wt. % or less than 3 wt. %. In addition, particularly when the stream is relatively small, a portion of the second distillate in line 132 may be purged. The second residue of recovery column 131, which mainly comprises water, is withdrawn in line 133. The water in line 133 may be purged from the system and optionally sent to waste water treatment. In some embodiments, a portion of the water may be returned to the decanter 120 and/or decanter 128 to maintain a desired water concentration for separation, fed as an extractive agent to one or more columns in the system, or used to hydrolyze impurities such as diethyl acetal in the process.
c. Membrane
In some embodiments as shown in
Suitable membranes include shell and tube membrane modules having one or more porous material elements therein. Non-porous material elements may also be included. The material elements may include a polymeric element such as polyvinyl alcohol, cellulose esters, and perfluoropolymers. Membranes that may be employed in embodiments of the present invention include those described in Baker, et al., “Membrane separation systems: recent developments and future directions,” (1991) pages 151-169, Perry et al., “Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook,” 7th ed. (1997), pages 22-37 to 22-69, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In other embodiments, water separation may be facilitated using an adsorption unit, molecular sieves, azeotropic distillation column, or a combination thereof.
Using a membrane separation unit 135 to remove water may provide an advantage over other means of removing water. Preferably at least 60% of the water in the organic phase in line 122 is removed, e.g., at least 75% or at least 90%. The resulting dried organic phase in line 137 preferably comprises less than 2 wt. % water, e.g., less than 1 wt. % water or less than 0.5 wt. % water, and may be either processed further in a purification column 125 as described above in
In some embodiments, organic phase in line 123 may not be refluxed to first column 104. Instead, a portion of the dried organic phase in line 137 may be refluxed. This allows a dried reflux which advantageously reduces the water in the overhead of first column 104 and may allow for less azeotroping agent to be used in first column 104. Reducing the amount of azeotroping agent allows for more of the ethyl acetate produced to be converted to ethanol and increases ethanol production. In other embodiments, membrane separation unit 135 may be used after extractive column 170 to remove water from the ester stream feed in line 175.
d. Extractive Column
In another embodiment, an ester feed stream may be recovered from the first distillate in line 112 using an extractive column 170 as shown in
As shown in
Extractant in line 172 may be separated, preferably biphasically separated, in a hold up tank 174. Although extractant in line 172 may have very low water concentration, e.g., less than first distillate, some water may be present. Hold up tank 174 provides sufficient residence time to allow an organic phase in line 175, rich in ethyl acetate, to be separated from extractant in line 172. Organic phase in line 175 comprises low concentrations of water, e.g., of less than 3 wt. %. Optionally an overhead decanter may be used. Organic phase in line 175, due to the relative lower water concentration than first distillate, may be refluxed to first column 104. The reflux ratio may vary but preferably is less than 5:1, e.g., less than 3:1 or less than 2:1. A portion of organic phase in line 175, or an aliquot portion thereof, may be directly fed as the ester feed stream to hydrogenolysis zone 102 as shown. In some embodiments, it may be preferred to preheat the organic phase directly fed to hydrogenolysis zone 102. An aqueous phase comprising water is also removed from hold up tank 174 via line 176 and combined with raffinate in line 173.
Although the temperature and pressure of extractive column 170 may vary, the temperature of the extracted overhead preferably is from 20° C. to 60° C., e.g., from 25° C. to 55° C. or from 30° C. to 50° C. The temperature at the base of the extractive column 170 preferably is from 20° C. to 60° C., e.g., from 25° C. to 55° C. or from 30° C. to 50° C. In other embodiments, the pressure of extractive column 170 may be from 80 kPa to 400 kPa, e.g., from 90 kPa to 300 kPa or from 100 kPa to 200 kPa.
Optionally the first distillate in line 112 may be biphasically separated and the organic phase thereof may be refluxed to column 104. In these optional embodiments, it may not be necessary to reflux any of the organic phase of the extractant.
In some embodiments, the organic phase may be further purified using purification column and/or membrane as described above before being fed to hydrogenolysis zone 102.
III. Hydrogenolysis
In general, the ethyl acetate produced by the esterification reaction zone 101 is fed as the ester feed stream to hydrogenolysis zone 102. As described above, ethyl acetate may be further purified from the esterification product before being fed to hydrogenolysis zone 102. Regardless of the purification method, the ester feed stream preferably comprises less than 5 wppm esterification catalyst, e.g., less than 1 wppm, or less than 0.1 wppm. In addition, although acetic acid may not be separated from the esterification product, the process preferably is controlled such that the ester feed stream comprises less than 1 wt. % acetic acid, e.g., less than 0.1 wt. %, or less than 0.01 wt. %.
The amount of ethanol and/or water, if any, in the ester feed stream depends on the purification of the ester feed stream as described above. Preferably, the ester feed stream comprises less than 6 wt. % ethanol, e.g., less than 5 wt. % or less than 2 wt. %. The ester feed stream may also comprises less than 8 wt. % water, e.g., less than 5 wt. % or less than 2 wt. %.
A. Hydrogenolysis Reaction
As shown in
Although vapor feed stream in line 143 is shown as being directed to the top of hydrogenolysis reactor 140, line 143 may be directed to the side, upper portion, or bottom of hydrogenolysis reactor 140.
Hydrogen fed to hydrogenolysis reactor 140 may be obtained from syngas. In addition, hydrogen may also originate from a variety of other chemical processes, including ethylene crackers, styrene manufacturing, and catalytic reforming. Commercial processes for purposeful generation of hydrogen include autothermal reforming, steam reforming and partial oxidation of feedstocks such as natural gas, coal, coke, deasphalter bottoms, refinery residues and biomass. Hydrogen may also be produced by electrolysis of water. In one embodiment, the hydrogen is substantially pure and contains less than 10 mol. % carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide, e.g., less than 5 mol. % or less than 2 mol. %.
In one embodiment, the molar ratio of hydrogen to ethyl acetate that is introduced into hydrogenolysis reactor 140 is greater than 2:1, e.g. greater than 4:1, or greater than 12:1. In terms of ranges the molar ratio may be from 2:1 to 100:1, e.g., 4:1 to 50:1, or from 12:1 to 20:1. Without being bound by theory higher molar ratios of hydrogen to ethyl acetate, preferably from 8:1 to 20:1, are believed to result in high conversion and/or selectivity to ethanol.
Hydrogenolysis reactor 140 may comprise any suitable type of reactor, such as a fixed bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor. Hydrogenolysis reactions are exothermic and in many embodiments, an adiabatic reactor may be used for the hydrogenolysis reactor. Adiabatic reactors have little or no need for internal plumbing through the reaction zone to add or remove heat. In other embodiments, a radial flow reactor or reactors may be employed, or a series of reactors may be employed with or without heat exchange, quenching, or introduction of additional feed material. Alternatively, a shell and tube reactor provided with a heat transfer medium may be used.
In preferred embodiments, a catalyst is employed in a fixed bed reactor, e.g., in the shape of a pipe or tube, where the reactants, typically in vapor form, are passed over or through the catalyst. Other reactors, such as fluid or ebullient bed reactors, can be employed. In some instances, a hydrogenolysis catalyst may be used in conjunction with an inert material to regulate the pressure drop of the reactant stream through the catalyst bed and the contact time of the reactant compounds with the catalyst particles.
The hydrogenolysis process may be operated in a vapor phase, or a mixed vapor/liquid phase regime. The mixed vapor/liquid phase regime is where the reactant mixture in line 143, at the reactor conditions, is below the dew point temperature. The hydrogenolysis reaction may change from a mixed vapor/liquid phase to a fully vapor phase reaction, as the reaction proceeds down the reactor. The mixed phase hydrogenolysis may also be conducted in other types of reactors, or within a combination of different reactors, for example in a slurry or stirred tank reactor with, or without, external circulation and optionally operated as a cascade or stirred tank, a loop reactor or a Sulzer mixer-reactor. The hydrogenolysis process may be conducted in batch, semi-continuous, or continuous mode. For industrial purposes, continuous mode of operation is the most efficient.
In some embodiments, the hydrogenolysis reactor may comprise other types of reactors, such as fluidized bed, spinning basket and buss loop, or heat exchanger reactors. A mixed vapor/liquid phase hydrogenolysis reaction can be conducted with co-flow or counterflow of the vapor, e.g., hydrogen, to the liquid, i.e. ester feed stream, in a bubble reactor. Trickle bed reactors may also be used.
In one embodiment, a heterogeneous catalyst is used in hydrogenolysis reactor 140. The catalyst may be a copper-based catalyst. Copper-based catalyst may comprise copper chromite, copper and zinc, and/or copper-zinc-oxide. Other copper-based catalyst may include an MgO—SiO2 support that is impregnated with copper. Mixed copper oxide based catalyst may include copper and a second metal selected from zinc, zirconium, manganese, and/or oxides thereof. In some embodiments, aluminum oxide may also be present in the catalyst. The presence of aluminum oxide is believed to increase the heavy alcohol, and/or ketone concentrations during the reduction of ethyl acetate due to the presence of acidic sites. In those embodiments, the catalyst may comprise a basic component, such as magnesium or calcium, to reduce the acidic sites or the aluminum oxide concentration may be very low, e.g., less than 0.1 wt. %. In some embodiments, the catalyst may be substantially free of aluminum oxide.
A suitable copper-based catalyst may comprises from 30 to 70 wt. % copper oxide, 15 to 45 wt. % zinc oxide, and/or 0.1 to 20 wt. % aluminum oxide. More preferably, a copper-based catalyst may comprises from 55 to 70 wt. % copper oxide, 20 to 35 wt. % zinc oxide, and/or 1 to 15 wt. % aluminum oxide. Preferably, the copper-based catalyst is supported on zinc oxide and preferably comprises from 20 to 70 wt. % of copper, in terms of the metal content.
In other embodiments, the catalyst employed in hydrogenolysis reactor 140 may be a Group VIII-based catalyst. Group VIII-based catalyst may comprise a Group VIII metal selected from the group consisting of iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhodium, iridium, nickel, palladium, and platinum. In addition, there may be one or more secondary promoter metals selected from the group consisting of zinc, cobalt, tin, germanium, lead, rhenium, tungsten, molybdenum. Group VIII-based catalysts may advantageously be supported on any suitable support known to those skilled in the art; non-limiting examples of such supports include carbon, silica, titania, clays, aluminas, zinc oxide, zirconia and mixed oxides. Preferably, the palladium based catalyst is supported on carbon. In addition, the Group VIII-based catalyst may be supported on any suitable support, such as silica, silica-alumina, calcium metasiciliate, carbon, titania, clays, aluminas, zinc oxide, zirconia, and mixed metal oxides. For example, palladium based catalysts may be supported on carbon.
The reduction of ethyl acetate to produce ethanol, e.g., in the hydrogenolysis reactor 140, is typically conducted at elevated temperatures from 125° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 180° C. to 345° C., from 225° C. to 310° C., or from 290° C. to 305° C. Reaction temperatures greater than 240° C., or greater than 260° C., may increase conversion of ethyl acetate. Although not bound by theory, it is believed that reduced temperatures in the hydrogenolysis reactor of less than 275° C. may suppress the formation of heavy impurities such as alcohols and/or ketones. The pressure in the hydrogenolysis reactor may operate under high pressure of greater than 1000 kPa, e.g., greater than 3,000 kPa or greater than 5,000 kPa. In terms of ranges the pressure in the hydrogenolysis reaction may be from 700 to 8,500 kPa, e.g., from 1,500 to 7,000 kPa, or from 2,000 to 6,500 kPa. Pressure greater than 2,500 kPa may be more favorable for improving ethanol productivity and/or selectivity. The reactants may be fed to hydrogenolysis reactor at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of greater than 500 hr−1, e.g., greater than 1000 hr−1, greater than 2500 hr−1 or even greater than 5000 hr−1. In terms of ranges the GHSV may range from 50 hr−1 to 20,000 hr−1, e.g., from 1000 hr−1 to 10,000 hr−1, or from 2000 hr−1 to 7,000 hr−1.
In particular, the reaction of ethyl acetate may achieve favorable conversion of ethyl acetate and favorable selectivity and productivity to ethanol. For purposes of the present invention, the term “conversion” refers to the amount of ethyl acetate in the feed that is converted to a compound other than ethyl acetate. Conversion is expressed as a mole percentage based on ethyl acetate in the feed. The conversion may be at least 50%, e.g., at least 70%, at least 90%. In terms of ranges, the conversion of ethyl acetate may range from 50 to 98%, e.g., from 60 to 95% or from 70 to 90%. Although catalysts and reaction conditions that have high conversions may be possible, such as greater than 90% or greater than 95%, in some embodiments a low conversion may be acceptable at high selectivity for ethanol. Compensating for low conversion by appropriate recycle streams or use of larger reactors may be easier than compensating for poor selectivity to ethanol.
Selectivity is expressed as a mole percent based on converted ethyl acetate. It should be understood that each compound converted from ethyl acetate has an independent selectivity and that selectivity is independent from conversion. For example, if 90 mole % of the converted ethyl acetate is converted to ethanol, we refer to the ethanol selectivity as 90%. The selectivity to ethanol is preferably at least 80%, e.g., at least 90% or at least 95%.
The term “productivity,” as used herein, refers to the grams of a specified product, e.g., ethanol, formed during the hydrogenolysis based on the kilograms of catalyst used per hour. A productivity of at least 100 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., at least 500 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or at least 1,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, is preferred. In terms of ranges, the productivity preferably is from 100 to 3,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., from 400 to 2,500 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or from 600 to 2,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour.
A crude reaction mixture is preferably withdrawn continuously from hydrogenolysis reactor 140 via line 145. Any water in ester feed stream may pass through the hydrogenolysis reactor and be present in a similar amount in the crude reaction mixture. The composition of the crude reaction mixture may vary depending on the ester feed stream, conversion, and selectivity. Exemplary crude reaction mixtures, excluding hydrogen and other gases such as methane, ethane, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide, are shown in Table 5 below.
Heavies in Table 5 includes organic compounds that have a larger molecular weight than ethanol, such as n-butyl acetate, sec-butyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, isopropyl acetate, 2-methyl-1-propanol, etc. Other acetates, aldehydes, and/or ketones may also be encompassed by heavies. The carbon gases refers to any carbon containing compound that is a gas at standard temperature and pressure, such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, ethane, etc. In one embodiment, the hydrogenolysis reaction is controlled to maintain low impurity concentrations of acetone, n-butanol, and 2-butanol.
B. Separation
The crude reaction mixture in line 145 may be condensed and fed to a separator 146, which, in turn, provides a vapor stream 147 and a liquid stream 148. In some embodiments, separator 146 may comprise a flasher or a knockout pot. Although one separator 146 is shown, there may be multiple separators in some embodiments of the present invention. The separator 146 may operate at a temperature of from 20° C. to 250° C., e.g., from 30° C. to 225° C. or from 60° C. to 200° C. The pressure of separator 146 may be greater than 1000 kPa, e.g., greater than 3,000 kPa or greater than 5,000 kPa. In terms of ranges the pressure in the separator may be from 700 to 8,500 kPa, e.g., from 1,500 to 7,000 kPa, or from 2,000 to 6,500 kPa.
Vapor stream 147 exiting separator 146 may comprise hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrocarbons, and may be purged and/or returned to hydrogenolysis reactor 140. In some embodiments, the returned vapor stream 147 may be compressed before being combined with hydrogen feed 141. Vapor stream 147 may comprise inert gases, such as nitrogen, or nitrogen may be fed to vapor stream 147 to increase molecular weight for improved polytropic compression requirements. Vapor stream 147 may be combined with the hydrogen feed 141 and co-fed to vaporizer 142.
In one embodiment, the crude reaction mixture in line 145 may be separated using one or more flashers as shown in
In
Distillation column 150 may be a tray column or packed column. In one embodiment, distillation column 150 is a tray column having from 5 to 110 trays, e.g., from 15 to 90 trays or from 20 to 80 trays. Distillation column 150 operates at a pressure ranging from 20 kPa to 500 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 300 kPa or from 80 kPa to 200 kPa. Without being bound by theory, lower pressures of less than 100 kPa or less than 70 kPa, may further enhance separation of liquid stream 148. Although the temperature of distillation column 150 may vary, when at atmospheric pressure, the temperature of the distillate exiting in line 151 preferably is from 40° C. to 90° C., e.g., from 45° C. to 85° C. or from 50° C. to 80° C. The temperature of the residue exiting in line 152 preferably is from 45° C. to 95° C., e.g., from 50° C. to 90° C. or from 60° C. to 85° C.
Exemplary compositions of the third column 150 are shown in Table 6 below. It should be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed in Table 6.
Without being bound by theory, the presence of acetaldehyde in the crude reaction mixture from the hydrogenolysis reactor may produce several different impurities. The heavy impurities, such as higher alcohols may build up in the third residue. In particular, 2-butanol has been found to be an impurity in this process. The weight ratio of 2-butanol to n-butanol in the third residue may be greater than 2:1, e.g., greater than 3:1 or greater than 5:1. Depending on the intended use of ethanol, these impurities may be of less significance. However, when a purer ethanol product is desired, a portion of third residue may be further separated in a finishing column 155 as described below in
1. Third Distillate to Recycle to Hydrogenolysis Section
Third distillate in line 151 may comprise ethyl acetate and/or ethanol. In one embodiment, as shown in
In one embodiment, third distillate in line 151 may comprise other organic compounds such as aldehydes. Recycling the aldehydes to esterification reactor 103, may cause aldol condensation and result in the production of other byproducts. However, recycling a third distillate in line 151 that contains aldehydes to hydrogenolysis reactor 140 tends to produce additional ethanol.
Third residue in line 152 may be withdrawn as the product. In one embodiment, shown in
Because ethanol return stream 153 is deficient in ethyl acetate for the purposes of azeotroping water in the overhead of first column 104, it may be necessary to combine ethanol return stream 153 with at least one ethyl acetate containing stream from the esterification separation processes. This will allow an azeotrope agent to be added to first column 104, as shown in
2. Third Distillate to Recycle Esterification Zone
In another embodiment, as shown in
Third distillate in line 151 may have a higher EtOH:EtOAc ratio when directing this stream to esterification zone 101 as compared to the EtOH:EtOAc ratio when recycling back to hydrogenolysis zone 102. The additional ethyl acetate from the third distillation column 150 may provide for an azeotrope agent to first column 104. In addition, the ethanol in the third distillate may be used to further esterify the acetic acid. In such embodiments, as shown in
Depending on the concentration of ethanol in third distillate in line 151, it may be optional to dilute the third distillate in line 151 with a portion of the third residue in line 152. Although it may be preferred to remove the ethanol to be used in esterification zone 101 via third distillate 151, in some embodiments, the process may require additional ethanol to be sent to esterification zone 101. In some embodiments, less than 20% of the third residue in line 152 may be combined with third distillate in line 151 and returned to esterification zone 101. More preferably less than 15% of the third residue in line 152 or less than 5% of the third residue in line 152.
3. Finishing Column
In some embodiments, it may be necessary to further treat the third residue to remove additional heavy compounds such as higher alcohols and any light components from the ethanol. As shown in
Ethanol sidestream 156 preferably comprises at least 90% ethanol, e.g., at least 92% ethanol and a least 95% ethanol. Depending on the amount of water fed to hydrogenolysis reactor 140, the water concentration in ethanol sidestream 156 may be less than 10 wt. %, e.g., less than 5 wt. % or less than 1 wt. %. In addition, the amount of other impurities, in particular diethyl acetal and 2-butanol, are preferably less than 0.05 wt. %, e.g., less than 0.03 wt. % or less than 0.01 wt. %. The fourth distillate in line 157 preferably comprises a weight majority of the diethyl acetal fed to fourth column 155. In addition, other light components, such as acetaldehyde and/or ethyl acetate may also concentrate in the fourth distillate. The fourth residue in line 158 preferably comprises a weight majority of the 2-butanol fed to fourth column 155. Heavier alcohols may also concentrate in the fourth residue in line 158.
Fourth column 155 may be a tray column or packed column. In one embodiment, Fourth column 155 is a tray column having from 10 to 100 trays, e.g., from 20 to 80 trays or from 30 to 60 trays. Fourth column 155 operates at a pressure ranging from 1 kPa to 510 kPa, e.g., from 10 kPa to 450 kPa or from 50 kPa to 350 kPa. Although the temperature of fourth column 155 may vary, the temperature of the residue exiting in line 158 preferably is from 70° C. to 105° C., e.g., from 70° C. to 100° C. or from 75° C. to 95° C. The temperature of the fourth distillate exiting in line 157 preferably is from 50° C. to 90° C., e.g., from 55° C. to 85° C. or from 65° C. to 80° C. Ethanol sidestream 156 is preferably withdrawn at the boiling point of ethanol, about 78° C. at atmospheric pressure.
As shown in
In some embodiments, a portion of the fourth residue, sidestream or fourth distillate may be dehydrated to form aliphatic alkenes. In one embodiment, the 2-butanol in the fourth residue may be dehydrated to 2-butene. In another embodiment, the 2-butanol in the fourth residue stream may be recovered in a separate system.
In one embodiment, instead of purging the fourth distillate in line 157 or the fourth residue in line 158, a portion thereof may be fed to vaporizer 107. Heavy ends compounds may be removed in the blowdown stream 109.
The ethanol product, either obtained as the third residue in
In
In some embodiments, the desired ethanol product is an anhydrous ethanol that is suitable for use as a fuel or as a blend for other fuels, such as gasoline. Water separation unit 160 as described herein may be suitable for producing anhydrous ethanol.
In one embodiment, in may be preferable to return a liquid ethanol stream 166 to the esterification zone 101. Thus, only the ethanol to be produced as anhydrous ethanol is subsequently dried, which may reduce the capital and energy requirements.
Ethanol sidestream 156 is preferably a vapor stream that is directed to water separation unit 160 to yield a water stream 161 and dried ethanol product stream 162. Water separation unit 160 may include an adsorption unit, one or more membranes, molecular sieves, extractive distillation units, or a combination thereof. More preferably, water separation unit 160 may be a pressure swing adsorption unit. The vapor ethanol sidestream 156 may comprise less than 10 wt. % water, e.g., less than 8 wt. % or less than 5 wt. %. Water separation unit 160 removes at least 85% of the water in ethanol sidestream 156, e.g. at least 90% or at least 95%. The resulting dried ethanol product stream 162 may have a water concentration that is less than 2 wt. %, e.g. less than 1 wt. %. or less than 0.5 wt. %. Dried ethanol product stream 162 may be used as a fuel-grade ethanol and may be blended with gasoline.
A wet ethanol stream 161 is also obtained from water separation unit 160 directed to recovery column 131 to recover any ethanol. The ethanol from wet ethanol stream 161 may be returned via the distillate in line 132 to esterification zone 101. Optionally, a portion of dried ethanol product in line 168 may be combined with the liquid ethanol stream 166 and returned to esterification zone 101.
The columns shown in the figures may comprise any distillation column capable of performing the desired separation and/or purification. For example, unless described otherwise, the columns may be tray columns having from 1 to 150 trays, e.g., from 10 to 100 trays, from 20 to 95 trays or from 30 to 75 trays. The trays may be sieve trays, fixed valve trays, movable valve trays, or any other suitable design known in the art. In other embodiments, a packed column may be used. For packed columns, structured packing or random packing may be employed. The trays or packing may be arranged in one continuous column or may be arranged in two or more columns such that the vapor from the first section enters the second section while the liquid from the second section enters the first section, etc.
The associated condensers and liquid separation vessels that may be employed with each of the distillation columns may be of any conventional design and are simplified in the figures. Heat may be supplied to the base of each column or to a circulating bottom stream through a heat exchanger or reboiler. Other types of reboilers, such as internal reboilers, may also be used. The heat that is provided to the reboilers may be derived from any heat generated during the process that is integrated with the reboilers or from an external source such as another heat generating chemical process or a boiler. Although one reactor and one flasher are shown in the figures, additional reactors, flashers, condensers, heating elements, and other components may be used in various embodiments of the present invention. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, various condensers, pumps, compressors, reboilers, drums, valves, connectors, separation vessels, etc., normally employed in carrying out chemical processes may also be combined and employed in the processes of the present invention.
The temperatures and pressures employed in the columns may vary. Temperatures within the various zones will normally range between the boiling points of the composition removed as the distillate and the composition removed as the residue. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the temperature at a given location in an operating distillation column is dependent on the composition of the material at that location and the pressure of column. In addition, feed rates may vary depending on the size of the production process and, if described, may be generically referred to in terms of feed weight ratios.
For purposes of the present invention, exemplary ethanol compositional ranges are provided below in Table 7. Depending on the application of the ethanol, one or more of the other organic impurities listed in Table 7 may be present.
In one embodiment, the recovered ethanol may have a composition that is from 92 wt. % to 97 wt. % ethanol, 3 wt. % to 8 wt. % water, 0.01 wt. % to 0.2 wt. % 2-butanol, and 0.02 wt. % to 0.08 wt. % isopropanol. The amount of 2-butanol may be greater than isopropanol. Preferably, other than 2-butanol and isopropanol, the recovered ethanol comprises less than 1 wt. % of one or more organic impurities selected from the group consisting of acetaldehyde, acetic acid, diethyl acetal, and ethyl acetate. The 2-butanol concentration in the ethanol sidestream may be reduced to an amount that is less than 0.01 wt. % when using a finishing column.
IV. Uses of Ethanol
Ethanol produced by the embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications including fuels, solvents, chemical feedstocks, pharmaceutical products, cleansers, sanitizers, hydrogenolysis transport or consumption. In fuel applications, ethanol may be blended with gasoline for motor vehicles such as automobiles, boats and small piston engine aircraft. In non-fuel applications, ethanol may be used as a solvent for toiletry and cosmetic preparations, detergents, disinfectants, coatings, inks, and pharmaceuticals. Ethanol may also be used as a processing solvent in manufacturing processes for medicinal products, food preparations, dyes, photochemicals and latex processing.
Ethanol may also be used as a chemical feedstock to make other chemicals such as vinegar, ethyl acrylate, ethyl acetate, ethylene, glycol ethers, ethylamines, ethyl benzene, aldehydes, butadiene, and higher alcohols, especially butanol. In the production of ethyl acetate, ethanol may be esterified with acetic acid. In another application, ethanol may be dehydrated to produce ethylene. Any known dehydration catalyst can be employed to dehydrate ethanol, such as those described in copending U.S. Pub. Nos. 2010/0030002 and 2010/0030001, the entire contents and disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. A zeolite catalyst, for example, may be employed as the dehydration catalyst. Preferably, the zeolite has a pore diameter of at least about 0.6 nm, and preferred zeolites include dehydration catalysts selected from the group consisting of mordenites, ZSM-5, a zeolite X and a zeolite Y. Zeolite X is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,882,244 and zeolite Y in U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,007, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In order that the invention disclosed herein may be more efficiently understood, examples are provided below. It should be understood that these examples are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the invention in any manner.
Vapor-phase reactor feed mixtures of acetic acid (HOAc) and ethanol (EtOH) were passed over Amberlyst™ 36 ion-exchange resin (IER) catalyst (Rohm & Haas) in a plug-flow tubular reactor at reaction temperatures in a range of 110° C. to 130° C., with an operating pressure of 101 kPa. The ion-exchange resin was diluted with 1 mm glass beads at a 2:1 dilution ratio. Liquid flow rates to the vaporizer were 6.7+/−0.2 g/minute. The vapor-phase reactor feed mixtures contained excess molar acetic acid concentrations in an acetic acid/ethanol molar ratio range of from 1.07:1 to 2:1. The observed conversions of ethanol ranged from 88.9% to 94.9% as shown in Table 8. EtOAc is an abbreviation for ethyl acetate.
Similar to Example 1, vapor-phase mixtures of acetic acid and ethanol were passed over 60 ml Amberlyst™ 36 ion-exchange resin catalyst at reaction temperatures in a range of from 120 to 130° C. at an operating a pressure of 101 kPa. An reactor feed acetic acid to ethanol mole ratio of 3:1 liquid mixture was fed to the vaporizer at liquid flow rates in a range from 15.7 to 20.1 g/minute. The observed conversions of ethanol ranged from 93% to 95.3% with ethyl acetate productivities in a range of from 69.2 to 85.3 moles/L cat/hr.
A series of vapor-phase acetic acid esterification reactions with ethanol were passed over 60 ml of Amberlyst™ 36 ion-exchange resin catalyst at LHSV values in a range of from 10.4 to 10.7 hr−1, with reaction temperatures in a range from 110° C. to 130° C. When at feed mixture of acetic acid/ethanol mole ratios of 1:1 or 1.2:1 the expected temperature effect on diethyl ether formation is shown in Runs 13-18. When the mole ratio is increased to 1.5:1, surprisingly and unexpectedly, there is a reduced diethyl ether formation regardless of the temperature effect. Table 10 summarizes the results.
The hydrogenolysis was carried out in a vapor-phase, heterogeneously catalyzed, continuously stirred tank (Berty type) reactor. The catalyst was T-2130™ (Süd Chemie), which has the following composition: CuO (26%), ZnO (53%). The hydrogenolysis catalyst was reduced at an operating pressure of 690 kPa with an initial temperature of 120° C. that was increased to 170° C. while introducing a low flow rate of hydrogen gas into a constant inert gas feed stream to the reactor to achieve a hydrogen concentration of 0.5-1.0% H2. The H2 concentration was slowly increased stepwise to 2.2%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 5.0% and 6.0% and then was held at a constant reactor temperature of 215° C.
A mixture of H2 (93.6 mol %), N2 (2.5 mol %), and ethyl acetate (3.9 mol %) was passed over 52.9 g T-2130™ catalyst at 260° C., with a pressure of 4140 kPa and GHSV of 6000 hr−1. The LHSV was 1.0 hr−1. The observed conversion of ethyl acetate was 86.4% with a selectivity to ethanol of 92.0%. The observed productivity of ethanol (g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr) was 510 g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr.
Operating under the same conditions as Example 4, a mixture of H2 (84.5 mol %), N2 (9.0 mol %), and ethyl acetate (6.5 mol %) was passed over 52.9 g T-2130™ at 240° C., with a pressure of 4140 kPa, GHSV of 1700 hr−1, and LHSV at 0.47 hr−1. The observed conversion of ethyl acetate was 87.8% and the selectivity to ethanol was 96.4%. The observed productivity of ethanol (g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr) was 290 g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr.
MegaMax 700™ (SW Chemie), which has the following composition: CuO (61%), ZnO (28%), Al2O3 (10%) was used in place of the T-2130 catalyst in Example 4. The operating conditions were similar as to Example 4. A mixture of H2 (92.0 mol %), N2 (2.7 mol %), and ethyl acetate (5.3 mol %) was passed over 38.72 g MegaMax700™ at 250° C. at an operating pressure of 2410 kPa, a GHSV of 5460 hr−1, and a LHSV of 1.3 hr−1. The observed conversion of ethyl acetate was 80.1% and the selectivity to ethanol was 85.1%. The observed productivity of ethanol (g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr) was 848 g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr.
Operating under the same conditions as Example 6, a mixture of H2 (90.4 mol %), N2 (2.4 mol %), and ethyl acetate (7.2 mol %) was passed over 38.72 g MegaMax700 at 250° C. at an operating a pressure of 5520 kPa, a GHSV of 6333 hr−1, and a LHSV of 2.0 hr−1. The observed conversion of ethyl acetate was 81.9% and the selectivity to ethanol was 89.0%. The observed productivity of ethanol (g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr) was 1470 g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr.
MegaMax700™ (38.72 g) was used to catalyze hydrogenolysis reactions with mixtures of H2 and ethyl acetate under operating conditions with reaction temperatures in a range of from 250 to 275° C., pressure ranges of from 350 to 800 psig and GHSV values ranging from 3693 to 6333 hr−1. The average conversion of ethyl acetate was 83.7% and the average selectivity to ethanol was 84.2%. Higher alcohols (C3-C4) detected in condensed hydrogenolysis reactor product samples included iso-propanol, 2-butanol, and 1-butanol as shown in Table 11.
A mix of ethyl acetate (87.6 wt %), ethanol (8.55 wt %), and water (3.8 wt %) was fed to a hydrogenolysis reactor. The liquid was vaporized to form a gaseous stream of H2 (89.2 mol %), N2 (4.0 mol %), EtOAc (5.0 mol %), EtOH (0.8 mol %), and water (0.9 mol %). The gas stream reacted over MegaMax 700™ at 275° C., with a pressure of 2514 kPa and GHSV of 5464 hr−1 and the LHSV was 1.3 hr−1. The observed conversion of ethyl acetate was 80.4% and the selectivity to ethanol was 94.2%. The observed productivity of ethanol (g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr) was 878.9 g EtOH/kg catalyst/hr. The same reaction was performed with pure ethyl acetate as the feedstock, and the concentration of impurities are compared in Table 12. Reduction (%)=(wt % impurity with pure EtOAc−wt % impurity with mix feed)/(wt % impurity with pure EtOAc)*100.
The following Examples 10 and 11 were prepared with ASPEN Plus 7.1 simulation software to test various feed composition and separation systems.
Fresh acetic acid and ethanol are fed to vaporizer along with recycle streams from the azeotrope column and hydrogenolysis purification. The molar ratio of acetic acid to ethanol in the combined feeds is approximately 2.4:1.0. The vaporizer is operated at a pressure of about 260 to 290 kPa and at a temperature of 140° C. to produce a vapor stream comprising 65 wt. % acetic acid, 20.7 wt. % ethanol, 7.7 wt. % ethyl acetate and 6 wt. % water. The vapor stream is fed to a fixed bed reactor containing a 36-ion exchange resin. The reactor is operated at a pressure of about 260 to 290 kPa and at a temperature of 130° C. to 140° C.
An esterification product is withdrawn continuously from the reactor and is directly fed to an azeotrope column. The esterification product comprises 40 wt. % acetic acid, 1.6 wt. % ethanol, 44.3 wt. % ethyl acetate and 13.5 wt. % water. The azeotrope column operates at a base temperature of 130° C. to 140° C. and a pressure of about 260 to 290 kPa. A distillate comprising 88 wt. % ethyl acetate, 2.5 wt. % ethanol, and 9.48 wt. % water is condensed and biphasically separated using a decanter into an organic phase and an aqueous phase. The organic phase comprises 93.4 wt. % ethyl acetate, 2.6 wt. % ethanol and 3.9 wt. % water. The organic phase further comprises less than 0.005 wt. % acetic acid. The organic phase is refluxed to the azeotrope column and a portion of the organic phase is forwarded to the hydrogenolysis reactor as the ester feed stream.
The aqueous phase, which comprises 85.2 wt. % water, is fed to a recovery column. The distillate of the recovery column comprises organic components that are separated from the aqueous phase and are then fed back to the decanter. The residue of the recovery column is purged. The recovery column operates at a base temperature of 100° C. at atmospheric pressure.
A residue is withdrawn from the azeotrope column and recycled to the vaporizer. The residue comprises 84.2 wt. % acetic acid, 7.4 wt. % ethyl acetate, 6.6 wt. % water and 0.7 wt. % ethanol. In addition to the residue, a sidestream withdrawn near the base of the azeotrope column is also withdrawn and recycled to the vaporizer. The sidestream comprises 65.8 wt. % acetic acid, 20.1 wt. % ethyl acetate, 11.8 wt. % water, and 1.3 wt. % ethanol.
A portion of the organic phase from Example 10, is fed along with hydrogen to a vaporizer in a hydrogenolysis process. The total ethyl acetate to hydrogen molar ratio is approximately 13:1.0. A vapor feed stream is withdrawn from vaporizer and fed to a fixed bed reactor. Fixed bed reactor contains a copper-based catalyst. The fixed bed reactor operates at a temperate of 240° C. and a pressure of about 3,500 kPa. The conversion of ethyl acetate in the reactor is about 85%. A crude reaction mixture comprising 62.1 wt. % ethanol, 9.4 wt. % ethyl acetate, 2.6 wt. % water, 0.09 wt. % 2-butanol, 0.69 wt. % acetaldehyde, 0.02 wt. % diethyl acetal, and gases, such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or methane. The crude reaction mixture is fed to a flasher to remove the gases and the liquid portion thereof is fed to a light ends column.
The light ends column is operated at a base temperature of about 78° C. at atmospheric pressure. The distillate of the light ends column is recycled to the vaporizer of the hydrogenolysis process. The distillate comprises 63.8 wt. % ethyl acetate, 28.8 wt. % ethanol, 1.5 wt. % water, and 9.6 wt. % acetaldehyde. The residue comprises 95 wt. % ethanol, 0.15 wt. % 2-butanol, and 0.03 wt. % acetaldehyde. The residue of light ends column is withdrawn and fed to a finishing column. An ethanol product is withdrawn as a sidestream from a point above the feed point. The residue of the finishing column comprises 93% of the 2-butanol fed to the finishing column, along with a portion of the ethanol. The distillate of finishing columns comprises about 99% or more of the acetaldehyde fed to the finishing column. The ethanol product comprises 95.4 wt. % ethanol, 4.52 wt. % water, less than 0.01 wt. % acetaldehyde, and less than 0.01 wt. % 2-butanol.
About 50% of the ethanol product is separated and returned to the esterification reactor described in Example 10.
Table 13 compares the ethanol product obtained from hydrogenolysis compared to fermentation, ethylene dehydrated, and acetic acid hydrogenation. Comparative A is a fermentation process that uses sugarcane and Comparative B is a fermentation process that uses molasses. Comparative C is a Fischer-Tropsch process. Comparative D is an acetic acid hydrogenation process. The ethanol product is shown as recovered using a finishing column and without a finishing column. The finishing column removes a significant amount of n-butanol and 2-butanol.
While the invention has been described in detail, modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. In view of the foregoing discussion, relevant knowledge in the art and references discussed above in connection with the Background and Detailed Description, the disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by reference. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the invention and portions of various embodiments and various features recited herein and/or in the appended claims may be combined or interchanged either in whole or in part. In the foregoing descriptions of the various embodiments, those embodiments which refer to another embodiment may be appropriately combined with other embodiments as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1469447 | Schneible | Oct 1923 | A |
| 1939116 | Fuchs | Dec 1933 | A |
| 2591671 | Catterall | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2591672 | Catterall | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2607719 | Eliot et al. | Aug 1952 | A |
| 2702783 | Harrison et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2715604 | Weaver, Jr. | Aug 1955 | A |
| 2744939 | Kennel | May 1956 | A |
| 2801209 | Muller et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
| 3404186 | Bailey et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3408267 | Miller et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3445345 | Katzen et al. | May 1969 | A |
| 3884981 | Kiff | May 1975 | A |
| 3925490 | Reich et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3990952 | Katzen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4262154 | Gane et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4306942 | Brush et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4328375 | Barlow | May 1982 | A |
| 4338221 | Qualeatti | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4352947 | Habib et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4370491 | Bott et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4379028 | Berg et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4395576 | Kwantes et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4398039 | Pesa et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4409405 | Lin et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4421939 | Kiff et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4422903 | Messick et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4429056 | Smith | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4430506 | Gauthier-Lafaye et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4443639 | Pesa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4448644 | Foster et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4454358 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4456775 | Travers et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4476326 | Lin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4481146 | Leupold et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4497967 | Wan | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4514521 | Smith | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4517391 | Schuster et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4541897 | Sommer et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4600571 | McCarroll et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4611085 | Kitson | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4628130 | Bournonville et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4678543 | Houben et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4751334 | Turner et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4758600 | Arimitsu et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4761505 | Diana et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774365 | Chen et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4837367 | Gustafson et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4837368 | Gustafson et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4842693 | Wheldon | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4943354 | Osterburg et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4985572 | Kitson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5004845 | Bradley et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5035776 | Knapp | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5047592 | Carpenter | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5061671 | Kitson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5124004 | Grethlein et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5149680 | Kitson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5185476 | Gustafson | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5185481 | Muto et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5196601 | Kitsuki et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5198592 | van Beijnum et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5215902 | Tedder | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220020 | Buchwald et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5250271 | Horizoe et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5284983 | Muto et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5334751 | Lemanski et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5403962 | Schneider et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414161 | Uhm et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5426246 | Nagahara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5449440 | Rescalli et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5476974 | Moore et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480665 | Smith | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488185 | Ramachandran et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5502094 | Moore et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5502248 | Funk et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5565068 | Parker et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567765 | Moore et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5658962 | Moore et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5747486 | Sohda et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5770761 | Lin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5831133 | Mimoun | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5993610 | Berg | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998658 | Wu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6024176 | Moore et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6046127 | Mimoun | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6093845 | Van Acker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6121497 | Murphy | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6204299 | Moore et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214253 | Moore et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6361713 | Moore et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6375807 | Nieuwoudt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6403840 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6462231 | Yanagawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6462243 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465696 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465699 | Grosso | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472572 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6486368 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491983 | Moore et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6509180 | Verser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6525230 | Grosso | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6552220 | Obana et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6632330 | Colley et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6693213 | Kolena et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6713655 | Yilmaz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6765110 | Warner et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6768021 | Horan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6809217 | Colley et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6863211 | Moore et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6867164 | Obana et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6927048 | Verser et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7019182 | Grosso | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7074603 | Verser et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7091155 | Inui et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7148390 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7161050 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7230150 | Grosso et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7351559 | Verser et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361794 | Grosso | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7507562 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7553397 | Colley et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7572353 | Vander et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7594981 | Ikeda | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7608744 | Johnston et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7652167 | Miller et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7667068 | Miller et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7682812 | Verser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7732173 | Mairal et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7744727 | Blum et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7790938 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7838708 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842844 | Atkins | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7863489 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7884253 | Stites et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7888082 | Verser et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7947746 | Daniel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7964379 | Verser et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8002953 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8053610 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062482 | Warner | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8080684 | Hassan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088832 | Melnichuk et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8129436 | Tirtowidjojo et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8198057 | Padgett | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8288596 | Garton et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8299132 | Gracey et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8299133 | Gracey et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 20010027172 | Moore et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020156328 | Grosso | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198416 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030069452 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077771 | Verser et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078456 | Yilmaz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104587 | Verser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120121 | Sherman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125585 | Yilmaz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125589 | Grosso | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135069 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153059 | Pilkington et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166973 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006246 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063184 | Grichko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152915 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040195084 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242917 | Inui et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267074 | Grosso et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050043572 | Grosso | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192468 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050214408 | Pilkington et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019360 | Verser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127999 | Verser et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224013 | Inui et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252956 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070144886 | Sylvester et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265360 | Luo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080135396 | Blum | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005588 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090023192 | Verser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081749 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090166172 | Casey et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264285 | Luo et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100030002 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069515 | Tirtowidjojo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100080736 | Hassan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121119 | Sherman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185021 | Ross et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261800 | Daniel et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273229 | Verser et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100311138 | Padget | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004034 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110034741 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046421 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224462 | Ditzel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20130131198 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131393 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131394 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131396 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131397 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131398 | Warner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131400 | Duff et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158297 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158302 | Duff et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1233484 | Mar 1988 | CA |
| 201768393 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102091429 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 101525272 | May 2012 | CN |
| 202214306 | May 2012 | CN |
| 2723611 | Nov 1978 | DE |
| 60025239 | Jun 2006 | DE |
| 0137749 | Apr 1985 | EP |
| 0104197 | May 1986 | EP |
| 0990638 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 0944572 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 2060553 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2215790 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 5186391 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| 6009454 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 6025033 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 6128181 | May 1994 | JP |
| 2009-263356 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2010-159212 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| WO 8203854 | Nov 1982 | WO |
| WO 8303409 | Oct 1983 | WO |
| WO 9825876 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 2008135192 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009009320 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009009322 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009009323 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009063174 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009063176 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009063176 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077719 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077720 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077725 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077729 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010055285 | May 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Pallasana et al., Reaction Paths in the Hydrogenolysis of Acetic Acid to Ethanol over Pd(111), Re(0001), and RdRe Alloys, Journal of Catalysis 209, 289-305 Mar. 1, 2002. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023338 mailed Sep. 6, 2011. |
| Juran et al., “Convert methanol to ethanol”, Hydrocarbon Processing, Oct. 1985, pp. 85-87. |
| Subramani et al., “A Review of Recent Literature to Search for an Efficient Catalytic Process for the Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol”, Energy & Fuels 2008, 22, pp. 814-839. |
| Zhang et al., Hydrogenation of Ethyl Acetate to Ethanol over Ni-Based Catalysts Obtained from Ni/Al Hydrotalcite-Like Compounds. Molecules 2010, 15, 5139-5152, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130131395 A1 | May 2013 | US |
