Patent Grant
10676845
Fiber-reinforced composite rods have been employed in a wide variety of applications as lightweight structural reinforcements. For example, power umbilicals are often used in the transmission of fluids and/or electric signals between the sea surface and equipment located on the sea bed. Such umbilicals generally include one or more pipes and electric conductors/wires collected in a bundle, a filler material arranged at least partly around and between the pipes and conductors/wires, and a protective sheath enclosing the pipes, conductors/wires, and filler material. To help strengthen such umbilicals, attempts have been made to use pultruded carbon fiber rods as separate load carrying elements. A significant problem with such rods however, it is that they rely upon thermoset resins (e.g., vinyl esters) to help achieve the desired strength properties. Thermoset resins are difficult to use during manufacturing and do not possess good bonding characteristics for forming layers with other materials. Attempts have been made to form rods from thermoplastic polymers in other types of applications. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0186410 to Bryant, et al., for instance, describes attempts that were made to embed carbon fibers into a thermoplastic resin to form a composite core of an electrical transmission cable. Unfortunately, Bryant, et al. notes that these cores exhibited flaws and dry spots due to inadequate wetting of the fibers, which resulted in poor durability and strength. Another problem with such cores is that the thermoplastic resins could not operate at a high temperature.
As such, a need currently exists for a fiber-reinforced rod that is formed from a thermoplastic material, and yet is still capable of achieving the desired strength, durability, and temperature performance demanded by a particular application.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a composite rod is disclosed that extends in a longitudinal direction. The rod has a core that contains a plurality of thermoplastic impregnated rovings comprising continuous fibers oriented in the longitudinal direction and a thermoplastic matrix that embeds the fibers. The fibers have a ratio of ultimate tensile strength to mass per unit length of greater than about 1,000 Megapascals per gram per meter. The continuous fibers constitute from about 25 wt. % to about 80 wt. % of the core and the thermoplastic matrix constitutes from about 20 wt. % to about 75 wt. % of the core. The ravings are distributed generally symmetrically about a longitudinal center of the core.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method for forming a composite rod is disclosed. The method comprises impregnating a plurality of rovings with a thermoplastic matrix and consolidating the rovings to form a ribbon, wherein the rovings are formed from continuous fibers oriented substantially in the longitudinal direction and having a ratio of ultimate tensile strength to mass per unit length of greater than about 1,000 Megapascals per gram per meter. The continuous fibers constitute from about 25 wt % to about 80 wt. % of the ribbon and the thermoplastic matrix constitutes from about 20 wt. % to about 75 wt. % of the ribbon. The ribbon has a void fraction of about 3% or less. The ribbon is heated to a temperature at or above the softening temperature of the thermoplastic matrix and pulled through at least one forming die to compress and shape the ribbon into a preform. The preform is cooled to form the rod.
Other features and aspects of the present invention are set forth in greater detail below.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof to one skilled in the art, is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification, including reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present invention.
It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present invention.
Generally speaking, the present invention is directed to a composite rod for use in various applications, such as electrical cables (e.g., high voltage transmission cables), power umbilicals, tethers, ropes, and a wide variety of other structural members. The rod includes a core that is formed from a plurality of unidirectionally aligned fiber ravings embedded within a thermoplastic polymer matrix. The present inventors have discovered that the degree to which the rovings are impregnated with the thermoplastic polymer matrix can be significantly improved through selective control over the impregnation process, and also through control over the degree of compression imparted to the rovings during formation and shaping of the rod, as well as the calibration of the final rod geometry. Such a well impregnated rod has a very small void fraction, which leads to excellent strength properties. Notably, the desired strength properties may be achieved without the need for different fiber types in the rod.
As used herein, the term “roving” generally refers to a bundle or tow of individual fibers. The fibers contained within the roving can be twisted or can be straight. Although different fibers can be used in individual or different rovings, it is generally desired that each of the rovings contain a single fiber type to minimize any adverse impact of using material with a different thermal coefficient of expansion. The continuous fibers employed in the rovings possess a high degree of tensile strength relative to their mass. For example, the ultimate tensile strength of the fibers is typically from about 1,000 to about 15,000 Megapascals (“MPa”), in some embodiments from about 2,000 MPa to about 10,000 MPa, and in some embodiments, from about 3,000 MPa to about 6,000 MPa. Such tensile strengths may be achieved even though the fibers are of a relatively light weight, such as a mass per unit length of from about 0.1 to about 2 grams per meter, in some embodiments from about 0.4 to about 1.5 grams per meter. The ratio of tensile strength to mass per unit length may thus be about 1,000 Megapascals per gram per meter (“MPa/g/m”) or greater, in some embodiments about 4,000 MPa/g/m or greater, and in some embodiments, from about 5,500 to about 20,000 MPa/g/m. Such high strength fibers may, for instance, be metal fibers, glass fibers (e.g., E-glass, A-glass, C-glass, D-glass, AR-glass, R-glass, S1-glass, S2-glass, etc.), carbon fibers (e.g., amorphous carbon, graphitic carbon, or metal-coated carbon, etc.), boron fibers, ceramic fibers (e.g., alumina or silica), aramid fibers (e.g., Kevlar® marketed by E. I. duPont de Nemours, Wilmington, Del.), synthetic organic fibers (e.g., polyamide, polyethylene, paraphenylene, terephthalamide, polyethylene terephthalate and polyphenylene sulfide), and various other natural or synthetic inorganic or organic fibrous materials known for reinforcing thermoplastic compositions. Carbon fibers are particularly suitable for use as the continuous fibers, which typically have a tensile strength to mass ratio in the range of from about 5,000 to about 7,000 MPa/g/m. The continuous fibers often have a nominal diameter of about 4 to about 35 micrometers, and in some embodiments, from about 5 to about 35 micrometers. The number of fibers contained in each roving can be constant or vary from roving to roving. Typically, a roving contains from about 1,000 fibers to about 100,000 individual fibers, and in some embodiments, from about 5,000 to about 50,000 fibers.
Any of a variety of thermoplastic polymers may be employed to form the thermoplastic matrix in which the continuous fibers are embedded. Suitable thermoplastic polymers for use in the present invention may include, for instance, polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene, propylene-ethylene copolymers, etc.), polyesters (e.g., polybutylene terephalate (“PBT”)), polycarbonates, polyamides (e.g., Nylon™), polyether ketones (e.g., polyetherether ketone (“PEEK”)), polyetherimides, polyarylene ketones (e.g., polyphenylene diketone (“PPDK”)), liquid crystal polymers, polyarylene sulfides (e.g., polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”), poly(biphenylene sulfide ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide diketone), poly(biphenylene sulfide), etc.), fluoropolymers (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene-perfluoromethylvinylether polymer, perfluoro-alkoxyalkane polymer, petrafluoroethylene polymer, ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene polymer, etc.), polyacetals, polyurethanes, polycarbonates, styrenic polymers (e.g., acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (“ABS”)), and so forth.
The properties of the thermoplastic matrix are generally selected to achieve the desired combination of processability and performance of the rod during use. For example, the melt viscosity of the thermoplastic matrix is generally low enough so that the polymer can adequately impregnate the fibers and become shaped into the rod configuration. In this regard, the melt viscosity typically ranges from about 25 to about 2,000 Pascal-seconds (“Pa-s”), in some embodiments from 50 about 500 Pa-s, and in some embodiments, from about 60 to about 200 Pa-s, determined at the operating conditions used for the thermoplastic polymer (e.g., about 360° C.). Likewise, when the rod is intended for use at high temperatures, a thermoplastic polymer is employed that has a relatively high melting temperature. For example, the melting temperature of such high temperature polymers may range from about 200° C. to about 500° C., in some embodiments from about 225° C. to about 400° C., and in some embodiments, from about 250° C. to about 350° C.
Polyarylene sulfides are particularly suitable for use in the present invention as a high temperature matrix with the desired melt viscosity. Polyphenylene sulfide, for example, is a semi-crystalline resin that generally includes repeating monomeric units represented by the following general formula:
These monomeric units typically constitute at least 80 mole %, and in some embodiments, at least 90 mole %, of the recurring units, in the polymer. It should be understood, however, the polyphenylene sulfide may contain additional recurring units, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,075,381 to Gotoh, et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. When employed, such additional recurring units typically constitute no more than about 20 mole % of the polymer. Commercially available high melt viscosity polyphenylene sulfides may include those available from Ticona LLC (Florence, Ky.) under the trade designation FORTRON®. Such polymers may have a melting temperature of about 285° C. (determined according to ISO 11357-1,2,3) and a melt viscosity of from about 260 to about 320 Pascal-seconds at 310° C.
According to the present invention, an extrusion device is generally employed to impregnate the rovings with the thermoplastic matrix. Among other things, the extrusion device facilitates the ability of the thermoplastic polymer to be applied to the entire surface of the fibers. The impregnated ravings also have a very low void fraction, which helps enhance its strength. For instance, the void fraction may be about 6% or less, in some embodiments about 4% or less, in some embodiments about 3% or less, in some embodiments about 2% or less, in some embodiments about 1% or less, and in some embodiments, about 0.5% or less. The void fraction may be measured using techniques well known to those skilled in the art. For example, the void fraction may be measured using a “resin burn off” test in which samples are placed in an oven (e.g., at 600° C. for 3 hours) to burn out the resin. The mass of the remaining fibers may then be measured to calculate the weight and volume fractions. Such “burn off” testing may be performed in accordance with ASTM D 2584-08 to determine the weights of the fibers and the thermoplastic matrix, which may then be used to calculate the “void fraction” based on the following equations:
Vf=100*(pt−pc)/pt
where,
Vf is the void fraction as a percentage;
pc is the density of the composite as measured using known techniques, such as with a liquid or gas pycnometer (e.g., helium pycnometer);
pt is the theoretical density of the composite as is determined by the following equation:
pt=1/[Wf/pf+Wm/pm]
pm is the density of the thermoplastic matrix (e.g., at the appropriate crystallinity);
pf is the density of the fibers;
Wf is the weight fraction of the fibers; and
Wm is the weight fraction of the thermoplastic matrix.
Alternatively, the void fraction may be determined by chemically dissolving the resin in accordance with ASTM D 3171-09. The “burn off” and “dissolution” methods are particularly suitable for glass fibers, which are generally resistant to melting and chemical dissolution. In other cases, however, the void fraction may be indirectly calculated based on the densities of the thermoplastic polymer, fibers, and ribbon (or tape) in accordance with ASTM D 2734-09 (Method A), where the densities may be determined ASTM D792-08 Method A. Of course, the void fraction can also be estimated using conventional microscopy equipment, or through the use of computed tomography (CT) scan equipment, such as a Metrotom 1500 (2 k×2 k) high resolution detector.
Referring to
A continuous fiber roving 142 or a plurality of continuous fiber rovings 142 are supplied from a reel or reels 144 to die 150. The rovings 142 are generally kept apart a certain distance before impregnation, such as at least about 4 millimeters, and in some embodiments, at least about 5 millimeters. The feedstock 127 may further be heated inside the die by heaters 133 mounted in or around the die 150. The die is generally operated at temperatures that are sufficient to cause melting and impregnation of the thermoplastic polymer. Typically, the operation temperatures of the die is higher than the melt temperature of the thermoplastic polymer, such as at temperatures from about 200° C. to about 450° C. When processed in this manner, the continuous fiber rovings 142 become embedded in the polymer matrix, which may be a resin 214 (
A pressure sensor 137 (
Within the impregnation die, it is generally desired that the rovings 142 are traversed through an impregnation zone 250 to impregnate the ravings with the polymer resin 214. In the impregnation zone 250, the polymer resin may be forced generally transversely through the ravings by shear and pressure created in the impregnation zone 250, which significantly enhances the degree of impregnation. This is particularly useful when forming a composite from ribbons of a high fiber content, such as about 35% weight fraction (“Wf”) or more, and in some embodiments, from about 40% Wf or more. Typically, the die 150 will include a plurality of contact surfaces 252, such as for example at least 2, at least 3, from 4 to 7, from 2 to 20, from 2 to 30, from 2 to 40, from 2 to 50, or more contact surfaces 252, to create a sufficient degree of penetration and pressure on the rovings 142. Although their particular form may vary, the contact surfaces 252 typically possess a curvilinear surface, such as a curved lobe, rod, etc. The contact surfaces 252 are also typically made of a metal material.
As shown in
The branched runners 222 and the symmetrical orientation thereof generally evenly distribute the resin 214, such that the flow of resin 214 exiting the manifold assembly 220 and coating the rovings 142 is substantially uniformly distributed on the ravings 142. This desirably allows for generally uniform impregnation of the rovings 142.
Further, the manifold assembly 220 may in some embodiments define an outlet region 242, which generally encompasses at least a downstream portion of the channels or runners 222 from which the resin 214 exits. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the channels or runners 222 disposed in the outlet region 242 have an increasing area in a flow direction 244 of the resin 214. The increasing area allows for diffusion and further distribution of the resin 214 as the resin 214 flows through the manifold assembly 220, which further allows for substantially uniform distribution of the resin 214 on the rovings 142.
As further illustrated in
Upon exiting the manifold assembly 220 and the gate passage 270 of the die 150 as shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
Angle 254 at which the rovings 142 traverse the contact surfaces 252 may be generally high enough to enhance shear, but not so high to cause excessive forces that will break the fibers. Thus, for example, the angle 254 may be in the range between approximately 1° and approximately 30°, and in some embodiments, between approximately 5° and approximately 25°.
In alternative embodiments, the impregnation zone 250 may include a plurality of pins (not shown), each pin having a contact surface 252. The pins may be static, freely rotational, or rotationally driven. In further alternative embodiments, the contact surfaces 252 and impregnation zone 250 may comprise any suitable shapes and/or structures for impregnating the rovings 142 with the resin 214 as desired or required.
To further facilitate impregnation of the rovings 142, they may also be kept under tension while present within the impregnation die. The tension may, for example, range from about 5 to about 300 Newtons, in some embodiments from about 50 to about 250 Newtons, and in some embodiments, from about 100 to about 200 Newtons per roving 142 or tow of fibers.
As shown in
The impregnation die shown and described above is but one of various possible configurations that may be employed in the present invention. In alternative embodiments, for example, the rovings may be introduced into a crosshead die that is positioned at an angle relative to the direction of flow of the polymer melt. As the ravings move through the crosshead die and reach the point where the polymer exits from an extruder barrel, the polymer is forced into contact with the rovings. Examples of such a crosshead die extruder are described, for instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,993,726 to Mover; U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,538 to Chung, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,277,566 to Augustin, et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,513 to Amaike, et al., which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. It should also be understood that any other extruder design may also be employed, such as a twin screw extruder. Still further, other components may also be optionally employed to assist in the impregnation of the fibers. For example, a “gas jet” assembly may be employed in certain embodiments to help uniformly spread a roving of individual fibers, which may each contain up to as many as 24,000 fibers, across the entire width of the merged tow. This helps achieve uniform distribution of strength properties. Such an assembly may include a supply of compressed air or another gas that impinges in a generally perpendicular fashion on the moving rovings that pass across the exit ports. The spread rovings may then be introduced into a die for impregnation, such as described above.
Regardless of the technique employed, the continuous fibers are oriented in the longitudinal direction (the machine direction “A” of the system of
As noted above, the rovings may be consolidated into the form of one or more ribbons before being shaped into the desired rod configuration. When such a ribbon is subsequently compressed, the rovings can become distributed in a generally uniform manner about a longitudinal center of the rod. Such a uniform distribution enhances the consistency of the strength properties (e.g., flexural modulus, ultimate tensile strength, etc.) over the entire length of the rod. When employed, the number of consolidated ribbons used to form the rod will vary based on the desired thickness and/or cross-sectional area and strength of the rod, as well as the nature of the ribbons themselves. In most cases, however, the number of ribbons is from 1 to 20, and in some embodiments, from 2 to 10. The number of rovings employed in each ribbon may likewise vary. Typically, however, a ribbon will contain from 2 to 10 rovings, and in some embodiments, from 3 to 5 rovings. To help achieve the symmetric distribution of the rovings in the final rod, it is generally desired that they are spaced apart approximately the same distance from each other within the ribbon. Referring to
The specific manner in which the rovings are shaped is also carefully controlled to ensure that rod can be formed with an adequate degree of compression and strength properties. Referring to
The ribbons 12 may be heated in an oven 45 before entering the consolidation die. Heating may be conducted using any known type of oven, as in an infrared oven, convection oven, etc. During heating, the fibers in the ribbon are unidirectionally oriented to optimize the exposure to the heat and maintain even heat across the entire ribbon. The temperature to which the ribbons 12 are heated is generally high enough to soften the thermoplastic polymer to an extent that the ribbons can bond together. However, the temperature is not so high as to destroy the integrity of the material. The temperature may, for example, range from about 100° C. to about 500° C., in some embodiments from about 200° C. to about 400° C., and in some embodiments, from about 250° C. to about 350° C. In one particular embodiment, for example, polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”) is used as the polymer, and the ribbons are heated to or above the melting point of PPS, which is about 285° C.
Upon being heated, the ribbons 12 are provided to a consolidation die 50 that compresses them together into a preform 14, as well as aligns and forms the initial shape of the rod. As shown generally in
The desired heating, compression, and shaping of the ribbons 12 may be accomplished through the use of a die 50 having one or multiple sections. For instance, although not shown in detail herein, the consolidation die 50 may possess multiple sections that function together to compress and shape the ribbons 12 into the desired configuration. For instance, a first section of the passage 51 may be a tapered zone that initially shapes the material as it flows from into the die 50. The tapered zone generally possesses a cross-sectional area that is larger at its inlet than at its outlet. For example, the cross-sectional area of the passage 51 at the inlet of the tapered zone may be about 2% or more, in some embodiments about 5% or more, and in some embodiments, from about 10% to about 20% greater than the cross-sectional area at the outlet of the tapered zone. Regardless, the cross-sectional of the flow passage typically changes gradually and smoothly within the tapered zone so that a balanced flow of the composite material through the die can be maintained. A shaping zone may also follow the tapered zone that compresses the material and provides a generally homogeneous flow therethrough. The shaping zone may also pre-shape the material into an intermediate shape that is similar to that of the rod, but typically of a larger cross-sectional area to allow for expansion of the thermoplastic polymer while heated to minimize the risk of backup within the die 50. The shaping zone could also include one or more surface features that impart a directional change to the preform. The directional change forces the material to be redistributed resulting in a more even distribution of the fiber/resin in the final shape. This also reduces the risk of dead spots in the die that can cause burning of the resin. For example, the cross-sectional area of the passage 51 at the shaping zone may be about 2% or more, in some embodiments about 5% or more, and in some embodiments, from about 10% to about 20% greater than the width of the preform 14. A die land may also follow the shaping zone to serve as an outlet for the passage 51. The shaping zone, tapered zone, and/or die land may be heated to a temperature at or above that of the glass transition temperature or melting point of the thermoplastic matrix.
If desired, a second die 60 (e.g., calibration die) may also be employed that compresses the preform 14 into the final shape of the rod. When employed, it is sometimes desired that the preform 14 is allowed to cool briefly after exiting the consolidation die 50 and before entering the optional second die 60. This allows the consolidated preform 14 to retain its initial shape before progressing further through the system. Typically, cooling reduces the temperature of the exterior of the rod below the melting point temperature of the thermoplastic matrix to minimize and substantially prevent the occurrence of melt fracture on the exterior surface of the rod. The internal section of the rod, however, may remain molten to ensure compression when the rod enters the calibration die body. Such cooling may be accomplished by simply exposing the preform 14 to the ambient atmosphere (e.g., room temperature) or through the use of active cooling techniques (e.g., water bath or air cooling) as is known in the art. In one embodiment, for example, air is blown onto the preform 14 (e.g., with an air ring). The cooling between these stages, however, generally occurs over a small period of time to ensure that the preform 14 is still soft enough to be further shaped. For example, after exiting the consolidation die 50, the preform 14 may be exposed to the ambient environment for only from about 1 to about 20 seconds, and in some embodiments, from about 2 to about 10 seconds, before entering the second die 60. Within the die 60, the preform is generally kept at a temperature below the melting point of the thermoplastic matrix used in the ribbon so that the shape of the rod can be maintained. Although referred to above as single dies, it should be understood that the dies 50 and 60 may in fact be formed from multiple individual dies (e.g., face plate dies).
Thus, in some embodiments, multiple individual dies 60 may be utilized to gradually shape the material into the desired configuration. The dies 60 are placed in series, and provide for gradual decreases in the dimensions of the material. Such gradual decreases allow for shrinkage during and between the various steps.
For example, as shown in
In further embodiments, the cross-sectional area of an inlet 62 and the cross-sectional area of a corresponding outlet 64 of the first die 60 may have a ratio in a range between approximately 1.5 to 1 and 6 to 1.
The first die 60 thus provides a generally smooth transformation of polymer impregnated fiber material to a shape that is relatively similar to a final shape of the resulting rod, which in exemplary embodiments has a circular or oval shaped cross-section. Subsequent dies, such as a second die 60 and third die 60 as shown in
In further exemplary embodiments, dies 60 having relatively long land lengths 69 may be desired, due to for example desires for proper cooling and solidification, which are critical in achieving a desired rod shape and size. Relatively long land lengths 69 reduce stresses and provide smooth transformations to desired shapes and sizes, and with minimal void fraction and bow characteristics. In some embodiments, for example, a ratio of land length 69 at an outlet 64 to major axis length 66 at the outlet 64 for a die 60 may be in the range between approximately 0 and approximately 20, such as between approximately 2 and approximately 6.
The use of calibration dies 60 according to the present disclosure provides for gradual changes in material cross-section, as discussed. These gradual changes may in exemplary embodiments ensure that the resulting product, such as a rod or other suitable product, has a generally uniform fiber distribution with relatively minimal void fraction.
It should be understood that any suitable number of dies 60 may be utilized to gradually form the material into a profile having any suitable cross-sectional shape, as desired or required by various applications.
In addition to the use of one or more dies, other mechanisms may also be employed to help compress the preform 14 into the shape of a rod. For example, forming rollers 90, as shown in
The rollers 90 in exemplary embodiments, such as at least the portions contacting the material, may have generally smooth surfaces. For example, relatively hard, polished surfaces are desired in many embodiments. For example, the surface of the rollers may be formed from a relatively smooth chrome or other suitable material. This allows the rollers 90 to manipulate the preform 14 without damaging or undesirably altering the preform 14. For example, such surfaces may prevent the material from sticking to the rollers, and the rollers may impart smooth surfaces onto the materials.
In some embodiments, the temperature of the rollers 90 is controlled. This may be accomplished by heating of the rollers 90 themselves, or by placing the rollers 90 in a temperature controlled environment.
Further, in some embodiments, surface features 92 may be provided on the rollers 90. The surface features 92 may guide and/or control the preform 14 in one or more directions as it is passed through the rollers. For example, surface features 92 may be provided to prevent the preform 14 from folding over on itself as it is passed through the rollers 90. Thus, the surface features 92 may guide and control deformation of the preform 14 in the cross-machine direction relative to the machine direction A as well as in the vertical direction relative to the machine direction A. The preform 14 may thus be pushed together in the cross-machine direction, rather than folded over on itself, as it is passed through the rollers 90 in the machine direction A.
In some embodiments, tension regulation devices may be provided in communication with the rollers. These devices may be utilized with the rollers to apply tension to the preform 14 in the machine direction, cross-machine direction, and/or vertical direction to further guide and/or control the preform.
If desired, the resulting rod may also be applied with a capping layer to protect it from environmental conditions or to improve wear resistance. Referring again to
When employed in certain applications, such as electric transmission cables, the capping layer may help prevent a galvanic response. In such embodiments, it is typically desired that the capping material has a dielectric strength of at least about 1 kilivolt per millimeter (kV/mm), in some embodiments at least about 2 kV/mm, in some embodiments from about 3 kV/mm to about 50 kV/mm, and in some embodiments, from about 4 kV/mm to about 30 kV/mm, such as determined in accordance with ASTM D149-09. Particularly suitable high dielectric strength capping layer materials may include polyketone (e.g., polyetherether ketone (“PEEK”)), polysulfide (e.g., polyarylene sulfide), or a mixture thereof.
Although by no means required, the capping layer may be generally free of continuous fibers. That is, the capping layer may contain less than about 10 wt. % of continuous fibers, in some embodiments about 5 wt. % or less of continuous fibers, and in some embodiments, about 1 wt. % or less of continuous fibers (e.g., 0 wt. %). Nevertheless, the capping layer may contain other additives for improving the final properties of the rod. Additive materials employed at this stage may include those that are not suitable for incorporating into the continuous fiber material. For instance, it may be desirable to add pigments to reduce finishing labor, or it may be desirable to add flame retardant agents to enhance the flame retarding features of the rod. Because many additive materials are heat sensitive, an excessive amount of heat may cause them to decompose and produce volatile gases. Therefore, if a heat sensitive additive material is extruded with an impregnation resin under high heating conditions, the result may be a complete degradation of the additive material. Additive materials may include, for instance, mineral reinforcing agents, lubricants, flame retardants, blowing agents, foaming agents, ultraviolet light resistant agents, thermal stabilizers, pigments, and combinations thereof. Suitable mineral reinforcing agents may include, for instance, calcium carbonate, silica, mica, clays, talc, calcium silicate, graphite, calcium silicate, alumina trihydrate, barium ferrite, and combinations thereof.
While not shown in detail herein, the capping die 72 may include various features known in the art to help achieve the desired application of the capping layer. For instance, the capping die 72 may include an entrance guide that aligns the incoming rod. The capping die may also include a heating mechanism (e.g., heated plate) that pre-heats the rod before application of the capping layer to help ensure adequate bonding. Following capping, the shaped part 15 is then finally cooled using a cooling system 80 as is known in the art. The cooling system 80 may, for instance, be a sizing system that includes one or more blocks (e.g., aluminum blocks) that completely encapsulate the rod while a vacuum pulls the hot shape out against its walls as it cools. A cooling medium may be supplied to the sizer, such as air or water, to solidify the rod in the correct shape.
Even if a sizing system is not employed, it is generally desired to cool the rod after it exits the capping die (or the consolidation or calibration die if capping is not applied). Cooling may occur using any technique known in the art, such a water tank, cool air stream or air jet, cooling jacket, an internal cooling channel, cooling fluid circulation channels, etc. Regardless, the temperature at which the material is cooled is usually controlled to achieve optimal mechanical properties, part dimensional tolerances, good processing, and an aesthetically pleasing composite. For instance, if the temperature of the cooling station is too high, the material might swell in the tool and interrupt the process. For semi-crystalline materials, too low of a temperature can likewise cause the material to cool down too rapidly and not allow complete crystallization, thereby jeopardizing the mechanical and chemical resistance properties of the composite. Multiple cooling die sections with independent temperature control can be utilized to impart the optimal balance of processing and performance attributes. In one particular embodiment, for example, a water tank is employed that is kept at a temperature of from about 0° C. to about 30° C., in some embodiments from about 1° C. to about 20° C., and in some embodiments, from about 2° C. to about 15° C.
If desired, one or more sizing blocks (not shown) may also be employed, such as after capping. Such blocks contain openings that are cut to the exact rod shape, graduated from oversized at first to the final rod shape. As the rod passes therethrough, any tendency for it to move or sag is counteracted, and it is pushed back (repeatedly) to its correct shape. Once sized, the rod may be cut to the desired length at a cutting station (not shown), such as with a cut-off saw capable of performing cross-sectional cuts or the rod can be wound on a reel in a continuous process. The length of rod will then be limited to the length of the fiber tow.
As will be appreciated, the temperature of the rod as it advances through any section of the system of the present invention may be controlled to yield optimal manufacturing and desired final composite properties. Any or all of the assembly sections may be temperature controlled utilizing electrical cartridge heaters, circulated fluid cooling, etc., or any other temperature controlling device known to those skilled in the art.
Referring again to
One embodiment of the rod formed from the method described above is shown in more detail in
A capping layer 519 optionally extends around the perimeter of the core 514 and defines an external surface of the rod 516. The cross-sectional thickness (“T”) of the core 514 may be strategically selected to help achieve a particular strength. For example, the core 514 may have a thickness (e.g., diameter) of from about 0.1 to about 40 millimeters, in some embodiments from about 0.5 to about 30 millimeters, and in some embodiments, from about 1 to about 10 millimeters. The thickness of the capping layer 519 depends on the intended function of the part, but is typically from about 0.01 to about 10 millimeters, and in some embodiments, from about 0.02 to about 5 millimeters. Regardless, the total cross-sectional thickness or height of the rod typically ranges from about of from about 0.1 to about 50 millimeters, in some embodiments from about 0.5 to about 40 millimeters, and in some embodiments, from about 1 to about 20 millimeters. While the rod may be substantially continuous in length, the length of the rod is often practically limited by the spool onto which it will be wound and stored or the length of the continuous fibers. For example, the length often ranges from about 1000 to about 5000 meters, although even greater lengths are certainly possible.
Through control over the various parameters mentioned above, rods having a very high strength may be formed. For example, the rods may exhibit a relatively high flexural modulus. The term “flexural modulus” generally refers to the ratio of stress to strain in flexural deformation (units of force per area), or the tendency for a material to bend. It is determined from the slope of a stress-strain curve produced by a “three point flexural” test (such as ASTM D790-10, Procedure A), typically at room temperature. For example, the rod of the present invention may exhibit a flexural modulus of from about 10 Gigapascals (“GPa”) or more, in some embodiments from about 12 to about 400 GPa, in some embodiments from about 15 to about 200 GPa, and in some embodiments, from about 20 to about 150 GPa. Furthermore, the ultimate tensile strength may be about 300 Megapascals (“MPa”) or more, in some embodiments from about 400 MPa to about 5,000 MPa, and in some embodiments, from about 500 MPa to about 3,500 MPa. The term “ultimate tensile strength” generally refers to the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before necking and is the maximum stress reached on a stress-strain curve produced by a tensile test (such as ASTM D3916-08) at room temperature. The tensile modulus of elasticity may also be about 50 GPa or more, in some embodiments from about 70 GPa to about 500 GPa, and in some embodiments, from about 100 GPa to about 300 GPa. The term “tensile modulus of elasticity” generally refers to the ratio of tensile stress over tensile strain and is the slope of a stress-strain curve produced by a tensile test (such as ASTM 3916-08) at room temperature. Notably, the strength properties of the composite rod referenced above may also be maintained over a relatively wide temperature range, such as from about −40° C. to about 300° C., and particularly from about 180° C. to 200° C.
Rods made according to the present disclosure may further have relatively flexural fatigue life, and may exhibit relatively high residual strength. Flexural fatigue life and residual flexural strength may be determined based on a “three point flexural fatigue” test (such as ASTM D790, typically at room temperature. For example, the rods of the present invention may exhibit residual flexural strength after one million cycles at 160 Newtons (“N”) or 180 N loads of from about 60 kilograms per square inch (“ksi”) to about 115 ksi, in some embodiments about 70 ksi to about 115 ksi, and in some embodiments about 95 ksi to about 115 ksi. Further, the rods may exhibit relatively minimal reductions in flexural strength. For example, rods having void fractions of about 4% or less, in some embodiments about 3% or less, may exhibit reductions in flexural strength after three point flexural fatigue testing of about 1% (for example, from a maximum pristine flexural strength of about 106 ksi to a maximum residual flexural strength of about 105 ksi). Flexural strength may be tested before and after fatigue testing using, for example, a three point flexural test as discussed above.
The linear thermal expansion coefficient of the composite rod may be, on a ppm basis per ° C., less than about 5, less than about 4, less than about 3, or less than about 2. For instance, the coefficient (ppm/° C.) may be in a range from about −0.25 to about 5; alternatively, from about −0.17 to about 4; alternatively, from about −0.17 to about 3; alternatively, from about −0.17 to about 2; or alternatively, from about 0.29 to about 1.18. The temperature range contemplated for this linear thermal expansion coefficient may be generally in the −50° C. to 200° C. range, the 0° C. to 200° C. range, the 0° C. to 175° C. range, or the 25° C. to 150° C. range. The linear thermal expansion coefficient is measured in the longitudinal direction, i.e., along the length of the fibers.
The composite rod may also exhibit a relatively small “bend radius”, which is the minimum radius that the rod can be bent without breaking and is measured to the inside curvature of the rod. A smaller bend radius means that the rod is more flexible and can be spooled onto a smaller diameter bobbin. This property also makes the rod easier to implement in processes that currently use metal rods. Due to the improved process and resulting rod of the present invention, bend radiuses may be achieved that are less than about 40 times the outer diameter of the rod, in some embodiments from about 1 to about 30 times the outer diameter of the rod, and in some embodiments, from about 2 to about 25 times the outer diameter of the rod, determined at a temperature of about 25° C. For instance, the bend radius may be less than about 15 centimeters, in some embodiments from about 0.5 to about 10 centimeters, and in some embodiments, from about 1 to about 6 centimeters, determined at a temperature of about 25° C.
The composite rod also has a very low void fraction, such as about 6% or less, in some embodiments about 3% or less, in some embodiments about 2% or less, in some embodiments about 1% or less, and in some embodiments, about 0.5% or less. The void fraction may be determined in the manner described above, such as using a “resin burn off” test in accordance with ASTM D 2584-08 or through the use of computed tomography (CT) scan equipment, such as a Metrotom 1500 (2 k×2 k) high resolution detector.
In addition to the parameters noted above, the composite rod may also exhibit a stress parameter that is about 10 MPa or more, in some embodiments about 15 MPa or more, and in some embodiments, from about 20 to about 50 MPa. The method for determining the stress parameter is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,093,416 to Johnson, et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. For example, sag and temperature may be measured and plotted as a graph of sag versus temperature. A calculated curve is fit to the measured data using an Alcoa Sag10 graphic method available in a software program from Alcoa Fujikura Ltd. (Greenville, S.C.) under the trade designation SAG10 (version 3.0 update 3.9.7). The stress parameter is a fitting parameter in SAG10 labeled as the “built-in aluminum stress”, which can be altered to fit other parameters if material other than aluminum is used (e.g., aluminum alloy), and which adjusts the position of the knee-point on the predicted graph and also the amount of sag in the high temperature, post-knee-point regime. A description of the stress parameter is also provided in the Alcoa Sag10 Users Manual (Version 2.0).
As will be appreciated, the particular rod embodiment described above is merely exemplary of the numerous designs that are made possible by the present invention. Among the various possible rod designs, it should be understood that additional layers of material may be employed in addition to those described above. In certain embodiments, for example, it may be desirable to form a multi-component rod in which one component is formed from a higher strength material and another component is formed from a lower strength material. Such multi-component rods may be particularly useful in increasing overall strength without requiring the need for more expensive high strength materials for the entire rod. The lower and/or higher strength components may be formed from ribbon(s) that contain continuous fibers embedded within a thermoplastic matrix.
It should be understood that the present invention is by no means limited to the embodiments described above. For example, the rods may contain various other components depending on the desired application. The additional components may be formed from a continuous fiber ribbon, such as described herein, as well as other types of materials. In one embodiment, for example, the rod may contain a layer of discontinuous fibers (e.g., short fibers, long fibers, etc.) to improve its transverse strength. The discontinuous fibers may be oriented so that at least a portion of the fibers are positioned at an angle relative to the direction in which the continuous fibers extend.
As indicated above, the rods of the present invention may be employed as a structural member for a wide variety of applications, including in electrical cables (e.g., high voltage transmission wires), power umbilicals, tethers, ropes, risers, etc. For example, the rod of the present invention may be used in forming all or a part of the core of an electrical transmission cable. Exemplary transmission cable designs and composites cores for such cables are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,319 to Heil, et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. Likewise, the rod may also be used, either alone or in bundles, in a power umbilical. The rods may be located in the center or distributed about the periphery of the umbilical. Exemplary power umbilical designs are described in more detail, for instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,798,234 to Ju, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,754,966 to Figenschou, which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following examples.
Two (2) continuous fiber ribbons were initially formed using an extrusion system as substantially described above. Carbon fiber rovings (Toray T700SC, which contained 12,000 carbon filaments having a tensile strength of 4,900 MPa and a mass per unit length of 0.8 grams per meter) were employed for the continuous fibers with each individual ribbon containing 4 rovings. The thermoplastic polymer used to impregnate the fibers was polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”) (FORTRON® PPS 205, available from Ticona LLC), which has a melting point of about 280° C. Each ribbon contained 50 wt. % carbon fibers and 50 wt. % PPS. The ribbons had a thickness of about 0.18 millimeters and a void fraction of less than 1.0%. Once formed, the ribbons were then fed to a pultrusion line operating at a speed of 20 feet per minute. Before shaping, the ribbons were heated within an infrared oven (power setting of 305). The heated ribbons were then supplied to a consolidation die having a circular-shaped channel that received the ribbons and compressed them together while forming the initial shape of the rod. Within the die, the ribbons remained at a temperature of about 177° C. Upon consolidation, the resulting preform was then briefly cooled with an air ring/tunnel device that supplied ambient air at a pressure of 1 psi. The preform was then passed through a nip formed between two rollers, and then to a calibration die for final shaping. Within the calibration die, the preform remained at a temperature of about 140° C. After exiting this die the profile was capped with a polyether ether ketone (“PEEK”), which had a melting point of 350° C. The capping layer had a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters. The resulting part was then cooled with an air stream. The resulting rod had a diameter of about 3.5 millimeters, and contained 45 wt. % carbon fibers, 50 wt. % PPS, and 5 wt. % capping material.
To determine the strength properties of the rod, three-point flexural testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790-10, Procedure A. The support and nose radius was 0.250 inch, the support span was 30 millimeter, the specimen length was 2 inches, and the test speed was 2 millimeters per minute. The resulting flexural modulus was about 31 Gigapascals and the flexural strength was about 410 MPa. The density of the part was 1.48 g/cm3 and the void content was less than about 3%. Likewise, the bend radius was 3.27 centimeters.
A rod was formed as described in Example 1, except that no capping material was employed. The rod thus contained 50 wt. % carbon fibers and 50 wt. % PPS. The void content was less than about 1.5% and the bend radius was 3.86 centimeters.
Two (2) continuous fiber ribbons were initially formed using an extrusion system as substantially described above. Carbon fiber rovings (Toray T700SC) were employed for the continuous fibers with each individual ribbon containing 4 rovings. The thermoplastic polymer used to impregnate the fibers was FORTRON® PPS 205. Each ribbon contained 50 wt. % carbon fibers and 50 wt. % PPS. The ribbons had a thickness of about 0.18 millimeters and a void fraction of less than 1.0%. Once formed, the ribbons were then fed to a pultrusion line operating at a speed of 20 feet per minute. Before shaping, the ribbons were heated within an infrared oven (power setting of 305). The heated ribbons were then supplied to a consolidation die having a circular-shaped channel that received the ribbons and compressed them together while forming the initial shape of the rod. Within the die, the ribbons remained at a temperature of about 343° C. Upon consolidation, the resulting preform was then briefly cooled with an air ring/tunnel device that supplied ambient air at a pressure of 1 psi. The preform was then passed through a nip formed between two rollers, and then to a calibration die for final shaping. Within the calibration die, the preform remained at a temperature of about 140° C. After exiting this die the profile was capped with FORTRON® PPS 320, which had a melting point of 280° C. The capping layer had a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters. The resulting part was then cooled with an air stream. The resulting rod had a diameter of about 3.5 millimeters, and contained 45 wt. % carbon fibers, 50 wt. % PPS, and 5 wt. % capping material.
To determine the strength properties of the rod, three-point flexural testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790-10, Procedure A. The support and nose radius was 0.250 inch, the support span was 30 millimeter, the specimen length was 2 inches, and the test speed was 2 millimeters per minute. The resulting flexural modulus was 20.3 Gigapascals and the flexural strength was about 410 MPa. The density of the part was 1.48 g/cm3 and the void content was less than about 3%. Likewise, the bend radius was 4.37 centimeters.
Two (2) continuous fiber ribbons were initially formed using an extrusion system as substantially described above. Glass fiber rovings (TUFRov® 4588 from PPG, which contained E-glass filaments having a tensile strength of 2599 MPa and a mass per unit length of 2.2 grams per meter) were employed for the continuous fibers with each individual ribbon containing 2 rovings. The thermoplastic polymer used to impregnate the fibers was polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”) (FORTRON® 205, available from Ticona LLC), which has a melting point of about 280° C. Each ribbon contained 56 wt. % glass fibers and 44 wt. % PPS. The ribbons had a thickness of about 0.18 millimeters and a void fraction of less than 1.0%. Once formed, the ribbons were then fed to a pultrusion line operating at a speed of 20 feet per minute. Before shaping, the ribbons were heated within an infrared oven (power setting of 330). The heated ribbons were then supplied to a consolidation die having a circular-shaped channel that received the ribbons and compressed them together while forming the initial shape of the rod. Upon consolidation, the resulting preform was then briefly cooled with ambient air. The preform was then passed through a nip formed between two rollers, and then to a calibration die for final shaping. Within the calibration die, the preform remained at a temperature of about 275° C. After exiting this die, the profile was capped with FORTRON® 205. The capping layer had a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters. The resulting part was then cooled with an air stream. The resulting rod had a diameter of about 3.5 millimeters, and contained 50 wt. % glass fibers and 50 wt. % PPS.
To determine the strength properties of the rod, three-point flexural testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790-10, Procedure A. The support and nose radius was 0.250 inch, the support span was 30 millimeter, the specimen length was 2 inches, and the test speed was 2 millimeters per minute. The resulting flexural modulus was about 18 Gigapascals and the flexural strength was about 590 MPa. The void content was less than about 0% and the bend radius was 1.87 centimeters.
Two (2) continuous fiber ribbons were initially formed using an extrusion system as substantially described above. Glass fiber rovings (TUFRov® 4588) were employed for the continuous fibers with each individual ribbon containing 2 rovings. The thermoplastic polymer used to impregnate the fibers was Nylon 66 (PA66), which has a melting point of about 250° C. Each ribbon contained 60 wt. % glass fibers and 40 wt. % Nylon 66. The ribbons had a thickness of about 0.18 millimeters and a void fraction of less than 1.0%. Once formed, the ribbons were then fed to a pultrusion line operating at a speed of 10 feet per minute. Before shaping, the ribbons were heated within an infrared oven (power setting of 320). The heated ribbons were then supplied to a consolidation die having a circular-shaped channel that received the ribbons and compressed them together while forming the initial shape of the rod. Upon consolidation, the resulting preform was then briefly cooled with ambient air. The preform was then passed through a nip formed between two rollers, and then to a calibration die for final shaping. Within the calibration die, the preform remained at a temperature of about 170° C. After exiting this die, the profile was capped with Nylon 66. The capping layer had a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters. The resulting part was then cooled with an air stream. The resulting rod had a diameter of about 3.5 millimeters, and contained 53 wt. % glass fibers, 40 wt. % Nylon 66, and 7 wt. % capping material.
To determine the strength properties of the rod, three-point flexural testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790-10, Procedure A. The support and nose radius was 0.250 inch, the support span was 30 millimeter, the specimen length was 2 inches, and the test speed was 2 millimeters per minute. The resulting flexural modulus was about 19 Gigapascals and the flexural strength was about 549 MPa. The void content was less than about 0% and the bend radius was 2.34 centimeters.
Three (3) batches of eight (8) rods were formed having different void fraction levels. For each rod, two (2) continuous fiber ribbons were initially formed using an extrusion system as substantially described above. Carbon fiber rovings (Toray T700SC, which contained 12,000 carbon filaments having a tensile strength of 4,900 MPa and a mass per unit length of 0.8 grams per meter) were employed for the continuous fibers with each individual ribbon containing 4 rovings. The thermoplastic polymer used to impregnate the fibers was polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”) (FORTRON® PPS 205, available from Ticona, LLC), which has a melting point of about 280° C. Each ribbon contained 50 wt. % carbon fibers and 50 wt. % PPS. The ribbons had a thickness of about 0.18 millimeters and a void fraction of less than 1.0%. Once formed, the ribbons were then fed to a pultrusion line operating at a speed of 20 feet per minute. Before shaping, the ribbons were heated within an infrared oven (power setting of 305). The heated ribbons were then supplied to a consolidation die having a circular-shaped channel that received the ribbons and compressed them together while forming the initial shape of the rod. Within the die, the ribbons remained at a temperature of about 177° C. Upon consolidation, the resulting preform was then briefly cooled with an air ring/tunnel device that supplied ambient air at a pressure of 1 psi. The preform was then passed through a nip formed between two rollers, and then to a calibration die for final shaping. Within the calibration die, the preform remained at a temperature of about 140° C. After exiting this die the profile was capped with a polyether ether ketone (“PEEK”), which had a melting point of 350° C. The capping layer had a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters. The resulting part was then cooled with an air stream. The resulting rod had a diameter of about 3.5 millimeters, and contained 45 wt. % carbon fibers, 50 wt. % PPS, and 5 wt. % capping material.
A first batch of rods had a mean void fraction of 2.78%. A second batch of rods had a mean void fraction of 4.06%. A third batch of rods had a mean void fraction of 8.74%. Void fraction measurement was performed using CT scanning. A Metrotom 1500 (2 k×2 k) high resolution detector was used to scan the rod specimens. Detection was done using an enhanced analysis mode with a low probability threshold. Once the specimens were scanned for void fraction, Volume Graphics software was used to interpret the data from the 3D scans, and calculate the void levels in each specimen.
To determine the flexural fatigue life and residual flexural strength of the rods, three-point flexural fatigue testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790. The support span was 2.2 inches and the specimen length was 3 inches. Four (4) rods from each batch were tested at a loading level of 160 Newtons (“N”) and four (4) rods from each batch were tested at a loading level of 180 N, respectively representing about 50% and 55% of the pristine (static) flexural strength of the rods. Each specimen was tested to one million cycles at a frequency of 10 Hertz (Hz).
Before and after fatigue testing, to determine the respective pristine and residual flexural strength properties of the rods, three-point flexural testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D790-10, Procedure A. The average pristine and residual flexural strengths of each batch at each loading level were recorded. The resulting pristine flexural strength for the third batch was 107 ksi, and the resulting residual flexural strength for the third batch was 75 ksi, thus resulting in a reduction of about 29%. The resulting pristine flexural strength for the second batch was 108 ksi, and the resulting residual flexural strength for the second batch was 72 ksi, thus resulting in a reduction of about 33%. The resulting pristine flexural strength for the first batch was 106 ksi, and the resulting residual flexural strength for the first batch was 105 ksi, thus resulting in a reduction of about 1%.
These and other modifications and variations of the present invention may be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged both in whole or in part. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention so further described in such appended claims.
This application relates to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/474,481, filed Apr. 12, 2011, titled: “CONTINUOUS FIBER REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC RODS”, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2012/033048 | 4/11/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/11/2013 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012/142107 | 10/18/2012 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3742106 | Price | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3858616 | Thiery et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3993726 | Moyer | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4013100 | Thiery et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4023799 | Van Auken | May 1977 | A |
| 4058581 | Park | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4176098 | Needham | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4194873 | Killmeyer | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4196307 | Moore | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4227037 | Layton | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4229397 | Fukuta et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4307979 | Killmeyer | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4443507 | Yamada | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4504338 | Ives | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4532169 | Carley | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4541884 | Cogswell et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4549920 | Cogswell et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4613393 | Cattanach et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4614678 | Ganga | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4640861 | Binnersley et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4680224 | O'Connor | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4692291 | Angell, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4713283 | Cogswell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4749422 | Kondo et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4770838 | Cattanach et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4778637 | Adams et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4792481 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4800113 | O'Connor | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4871491 | McMahon et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4876055 | Cattanach | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4892772 | Su | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4902453 | Okura et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4904436 | Rachal | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4907855 | Oestreich | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4923134 | Kinnan | May 1990 | A |
| 4937032 | Krone et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4939002 | Hilakos | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4992229 | Beever | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4997693 | Sonoh et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5001184 | Barnes et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5017643 | Snelling et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5018583 | Williams | May 1991 | A |
| 5037599 | Olson | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5039572 | Bobsein et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042765 | Widerstrom | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5045377 | Amata | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5066536 | Cogswell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5080175 | Williams | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082701 | Craven et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085928 | Frueger | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5087657 | Qureshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089326 | Bonazza | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5097870 | Williams | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5108780 | Pitt et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5126167 | Matsuno et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130193 | Ikeda | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137766 | Mazanek et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5145626 | Bastioli et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149581 | Matsuo et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149749 | Blackwell et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5172765 | Sas-Jaworsky | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176180 | Williams | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5176775 | Montsinger | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5181930 | Dumbleton et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192330 | Chang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5207850 | Parekh | May 1993 | A |
| 5209136 | Williams | May 1993 | A |
| 5209888 | Shimada et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5210128 | Johnson | May 1993 | A |
| 5234058 | Sas-Jaworsky | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5246520 | Scanlon et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5282673 | Koyama et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5285008 | Sas-Jaworsky | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5285699 | Walls | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286553 | Haraguchi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286561 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5298318 | Soules et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5316834 | Matsuda et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5319003 | Gomez et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324563 | Rogers et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5348084 | Fay | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5361483 | Rainville et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5362545 | Tingley | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5362921 | Birkelund et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364657 | Throne | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370911 | Throne et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374694 | MacKenzie et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5424388 | Chen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429066 | Lewit et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5439632 | Leach et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5439635 | Seemann | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5454693 | Aubry et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462408 | Coffy | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462618 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468327 | Pawlowicz et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5529652 | Asai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5525003 | Williams et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5542230 | Schutze | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5614139 | Cutolo et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5650220 | Greenwood | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5700417 | Fernyhough et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702628 | Nemoto | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5705241 | Schutze | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5717263 | Cox | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725954 | Montsinger | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727357 | Arumugasaamy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5741382 | Ma et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5769160 | Owens | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776607 | McCullough | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783129 | Shirai et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788908 | Murakami | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792527 | Yoshimitsu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5813106 | Haug et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5840424 | McGrail et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5858493 | Sandt | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866051 | Lin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888609 | Karttunen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892874 | Houghton | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895808 | Schmid et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902958 | Haxton | May 1999 | A |
| 5908049 | Williams | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913003 | Arroyo | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913337 | Williams | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5921285 | Quigley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935508 | Fernyhough et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5972503 | Woodside | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972810 | Gabrisch et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989710 | Matsuo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004650 | Schweizer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6027786 | Ford | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6046404 | Figenschou et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048598 | Bryan, III et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6061902 | Kalamkarov et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074716 | Tsotsis | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090319 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6106650 | Cheshire | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117551 | Nagata et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6146052 | Jacobsen | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6179942 | Padmanabhan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6221798 | Mahale et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6244014 | Barmakian | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248262 | Kubotera et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251206 | Saito et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258453 | Montsinger | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260343 | Pourladian | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270851 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283206 | Fraser | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299246 | Tomka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6322893 | Gauchel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6329056 | Deve et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334293 | Poethke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344270 | McCullough et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6346325 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6355133 | Williams | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355879 | Bertini | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365257 | Hecht | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391456 | Krishnaswamy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391959 | Ninomiya et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6417457 | Aasbo et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6455143 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6472614 | Dupont et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6485796 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6538198 | Wooters | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6567591 | Hoch | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6596373 | Kishi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6612370 | Jahnsen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620471 | Do | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6630221 | Wong | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647187 | Consonni et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6656316 | Dyksterhouse | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6658836 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6676870 | Hattori et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6714709 | Birkeland et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6715191 | Adzima et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6740381 | Day et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743742 | LaRocco et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6773773 | Hauber | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6808796 | Miyao et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6821613 | Kägi et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6846857 | Lindner | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6872343 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6919115 | Foster | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6940054 | Heggdal | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6943300 | Ekeberg | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7015395 | Goldsworthy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7041194 | Mueller et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7049025 | Cooper et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7059091 | Paulshus et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7060326 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7093416 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7131308 | McCullough et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7138345 | Wadahara et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7158703 | Mjelstad | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7170007 | Varkey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7179517 | Jones et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7179522 | Hiel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188406 | Varkey et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7211319 | Hiel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7220492 | Fick et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7235742 | Aochi et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7239781 | Chartier | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7275734 | Bland et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7282638 | Karlsen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7285726 | Bremnes | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7291263 | Ward et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7326854 | Varkey | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7368162 | Hiel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381900 | Bremnes | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7402753 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7438971 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7473844 | Figenschou | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7485811 | Mjelstad | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7586042 | Varkey et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7629535 | Espen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7650742 | Ushijima | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7683262 | Guery et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7705242 | Winterhalter | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7643713 | Büthe | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754966 | Figenschou | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7798234 | Ju et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7886872 | Astor et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8016078 | Astor et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8418811 | Kelly | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8632708 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8673416 | Swift et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8858208 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8944213 | Astor et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9012021 | Swift et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9187641 | Ouchiyama et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9238347 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9266389 | Drury et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9416272 | Ouchiyama et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9443635 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 10077600 | Kelly | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 20020019182 | Ishibashi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041049 | McCullough | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020125603 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180095 | Berard | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030037529 | Hanna et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044593 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082380 | Hager et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096898 | Bernd et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104191 | Yokoo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121594 | Brill | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148085 | Edwards | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168164 | Blackmore et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175489 | Dolby | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040062915 | Pabedinskas et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081816 | Pyzik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098963 | Calleeuw et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102115 | Chou | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142143 | Corden et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146696 | Jones | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182597 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170554 | Wadahara et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224590 | Rawa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040241415 | Wadahara et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040265558 | Berard | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050116403 | Wellman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123374 | Thorning | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150593 | Honma et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050178000 | McCullough et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181228 | McCullough et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186410 | Bryant et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236093 | Taggart | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244231 | Liao et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252376 | Von Blucher | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060013979 | Ensinger | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021729 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024489 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024490 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060027314 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060049541 | Sutton et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060141232 | Ma | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144456 | Donnison | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165955 | Ruegg et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204739 | Papke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252334 | LaFaro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060280938 | Atkinson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288568 | Clouet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070090162 | Verhaeghe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128435 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154710 | Bradley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070175571 | Rubin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193767 | Guery et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193829 | Astor et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202331 | Davis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204948 | Gauchel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205009 | Figenschou | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251694 | Ju | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253778 | Figenschou | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269645 | Raghavendran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271897 | Hanna et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070289234 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080006337 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080028740 | Ushijima | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141614 | Knouff et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250631 | Buckley | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282664 | Chou et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282666 | Chou | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090120632 | Worman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090229452 | Milwich et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100012342 | Figenschou | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100038112 | Grether | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054677 | Figenschou | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136278 | Cadd et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143145 | Jones | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163275 | Hiel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166998 | Bannister et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100181012 | Hiel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100206606 | Winterhalter | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243289 | Figenschou | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243316 | Inderberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261000 | Jones | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291370 | Jones | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20120263539 | Figenschou | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20140005331 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20150024175 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136524 | Astor et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160035453 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160160563 | Gauchel et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2071207 | Feb 1991 | CN |
| 1220330 | Jun 1999 | CN |
| 2637534 | Sep 2004 | CN |
| 1631656 | Jun 2005 | CN |
| 101025074 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 0177475 | Apr 1986 | EP |
| 0628674 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0714756 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 1099538 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1128958 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1438169 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1724306 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1469484 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 2836591 | Aug 2003 | FR |
| 2240997 | Aug 1991 | GB |
| S63-216732 | Sep 1988 | JP |
| H02-151407 | Jun 1990 | JP |
| H03-119188 | May 1991 | JP |
| H05-033270 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| H05-064810 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| H05-148780 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| H06-143440 | May 1994 | JP |
| H07-251437 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| H07-279940 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| H08-108483 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| 2004300609 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2011-056816 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| WO2003091008 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005033393 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2008111847 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009092989 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009118536 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009130525 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010066692 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011163349 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011163357 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011156693 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ticona LLC; Chinese Patent Application 201280018119.0; CN Search Report dated May 13, 2015, (1 page). |
| Ticona LLC; International Patent Application PCT/US2012/033048; International Search Report dated Aug. 21, 2012, (2 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140106166 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61474481 | Apr 2011 | US |
