1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to methods and systems for imparting desired shape and surface characteristics to a moldable or pliable material as the material cures or hardens. It is particularly applicable to the shaping and embossing of thermosetting resin systems during curing, and can be used to form these resin systems into a variety of products, including synthetic lumber, roofing, and siding.
2. Description of the Related Art
Various techniques exist for continuously forming a soft or moldable material while it hardens or cures. For example, conveyor belts can be used to provide continuous support and movement for materials, and in some cases the belt faces may be contoured or profiled to mold the surfaces of the material and to impart a shape, feature, or surface appearance to the material. Two or more such belts may be configured to operate with the belt surfaces opposed and the material to be molded or shaped disposed between them. These systems can form fairly detailed three-dimensional products.
However, when such systems are used to form a foamed product, the structure of the overall system must be sufficiently strong to contain the pressure of the expanding foam. The longer the forming system and the larger the cross-section of the product to be formed, the greater the total force due to pressure and friction that the system must contain and overcome. As a result, in general, belt systems have not been thought to be suitable for formation of resin systems that involve foaming of the polymer matrix.
Forming systems have been developed to produce large rectangular polyurethane foam buns; these systems typically contain the foaming material within roller-supported films or sheets. The many rollers used in these systems contain the increase in pressure due to foaming, and also help to minimize system friction. However, these systems are generally not able to mold detail or texture into the product surface.
Pullers are two-belted machines designed to grip and pull an extruded profile. As indicated above, conventional two-belt systems, such as pullers that utilize thick profiled belts, may be configured to continuously mold detail and texture into a product. However, these forming systems typically require profiled belts with relatively thick sidewall cross sections. The thick sidewalls minimize deflection of the unsupported sides of the mold-belt, thereby maintaining the intended product shape, and limiting extrusion of material through the resultant gap between belts. The thickness of the product formed by a conventional two-belt system is thus limited in practice by the thickness and width of the profiled mold-belts. Thicker belts needed to form products with deeper profiles require larger diameter end pulleys in order to prevent excessive bending, stretching, and premature breakage of the mold material.
In addition, most pullers are relatively short (6 feet or less). These short forming systems tend to require slower production speeds, allowing the product enough time in-mold to harden sufficiently before exiting the forming unit. Longer two-belt machines can be made, but in order to manage belt/bed friction these longer systems typically require the use of rollers to support the back of the profiled belts. Roller supported mold-belts tend to allow the mold faces to separate between rollers where the belts are unsupported, allowing material to leak between belt faces.
To continuously mold larger foamed cross-sections and to impart irregular shape or surface detail to the product, table-top conveyors are frequently used. Table-top conveyors use segmented metal mold sections attached to a metal chain-type conveyor. Two table-top conveyors are typically arranged face-to-face when used in this type of application, providing a rigid continuous mold. Preventing material from migrating into the joints between adjacent mold sections can be problematic for this type of forming system and may required the use of plastic films disposed between the mold and material to prevent leaks. In addition, such table-top conveyor systems are complex and costly.
Because of the various difficulties and deficiencies described above for existing forming systems, there remains a need in the art for a low cost forming system that can shape a curing polymer system, and in particular a foaming polymer system, without leaking. There is a need for such a system that can impart surface patterns and designs to the curing material, and that has sufficiently low friction and thickness that it can be practically made long enough to allow sufficient curing time in the system.
The invention disclosed in this application is a new type of forming system utilizing up to six belts. The forming system is uniquely suited to the continuous forming of a range of product sizes with intricate molded-in detail. Material that may be formed using the described system include but are not limited to: thermoplastic and thermoset plastic compounds, highly-filled plastic compounds, elastomers, ceramic materials, and cementitious materials. The system is particularly suited to the forming of foamed materials. The material to be formed may be poured, dropped, extruded, spread, or sprayed onto or into the forming system.
In one embodiment, the invention relates to a system for providing shape, surface features, or both, to a moldable material, the system having:
at least two first opposed flat endless belts disposed a first distance apart from each other, each having an inner surface and an outer surface;
at least two second opposed flat endless belts disposed substantially orthogonal to the first two opposed endless belts and a second distance apart from each other, and each having an inner surface and an outer surface;
a mold cavity defined at least in part by the inner surfaces of at least two of the opposed flat endless belts; and
a drive mechanism for imparting motion to at least two of the opposed flat endless belts.
In a more particular embodiment, the invention relates to a forming system having 4 flat belted conveyors configured so as to define and enclose the top, bottom, and sides of a 4-sided, open-ended channel, and an additional two profiled mold-belts that are configured to fit snugly, face-to-face within the channel provided by the surrounding flat belts. All belts are endless and supported by pulleys at the ends of their respective beds so as to allow each belt to travel continuously about its fixed path.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of continuously forming a moldable material to have a desired shape or surface feature or both, comprising:
introducing the moldable material into an end of a mold cavity formed at least in part by the inner surfaces of two substantially orthogonal sets of opposed flat belts;
exerting pressure on the moldable material through the opposed flat belts;
transferring the moldable material along the mold cavity by longitudinal movement of the belts;
after sufficient time for the material to cure or harden into the molded configuration and thereby form molded material, removing the molded material from the mold cavity.
The system and method are versatile, permitting the production of a range of product sizes and profiles using the same machine. In an exemplary embodiment, the system and method provide for the continuous forming of synthetic lumber, roofing tiles, molded trim profiles, siding or other building products from heavily-filled, foamed thermoset plastic compounds and/or foamed ceramic compounds with organic binders.
For clarity of understanding, the invention will be described herein with respect to a single apparatus. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not so limited, and the system and method of the invention may involve two or more such systems operated in series or in parallel, and that a single system may contain multiple sets of belts, again operated in series or in parallel.
Flat-Belted Conveyor Channel
Each set of opposed flat belt conveyors are oriented so that their bearing surfaces face each other. One set of opposed flat belts can be thought of as “upper” and “lower” belts, although these descriptors are not limiting, nor do they require that the two opposed belts be horizontal. In practice, however, one set of opposed belts (the upper and lower belts) will be substantially horizontal. These belts can define the upper and lower surfaces of a mold cavity (when the device is operated in four-belt mode), or may provide support and drive surfaces for a set of opposed profile mold belts (when the device is operated in six-belt mode). The remaining set of opposed flat belts are disposed substantially orthogonal to the first set. As used herein, the term “substantially orthogonal” means close to perpendicular, but allowing for some deviation from 90° resulting from adjustment of the device, variations from level in the manufacturing floor, etc. This substantially orthogonal arrangement is accomplished in two basic configurations.
The first exemplary configuration involves disposing the flat bearing surfaces of the second set of belts along the sides of the space formed by the first set of belts, thereby forming an open-ended mold cavity that is enclosed by flat belts, and having a length corresponding to the length of the “side” belts. This configuration is illustrated in
The arrangement of belts and the corresponding rollers for this exemplary configuration can be seen in more detail in
As mentioned above, each flat belt is supported by a slider-bed or platen comprised of a rigid metal plate or other rigid supporting surface, if the length of the belt makes such support necessary or desirable. Generally, in order to provide sufficient curing time for filled polyurethane foams, a support surface is desirable but not required. The surface of the slider-bed in one embodiment has a slippery coating or bed-plate material attached or bonded to it (for example, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, PTFE, or other fluoropolymer). Also, the belt has a slippery backing material (for example, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, PTFE or other fluoropolymer) to reduce friction between the bed and moving belt in an exemplary emboidment.
To further reduce friction and enhance cooling of the belts and conveyor machinery, the slider-beds and attached slippery surface material of a conveyor has a plurality of relatively small holes drilled through the surface These holes are in fluid communication with a source of compressed gas, such as air. As an example, a plenum chamber is provided behind each slider bed, which is then connected to a source of pressurized air. Pressurized air fed into each plenum passes through the holes in the bed, and provides a layer of air between the bed and the adjacent belt. This air film provides lubrication between the bed and adjacent belt as shown in FIG. 2., where compressed air is supplied to the plenums through openings 20, 20′. The air fed into the plenums has a pressure higher than the foaming pressure of the product to be useful in reducing operating friction. In one embodiment, shop air or high-pressure blowers are used to provide the pressurized air to feed the plenums.
In a more particular exemplary embodiment, shown in
The flat-belts are powered and driven at matching speeds with respect to one another. The matched speed are achieved, in one embodiment, by mechanical linkage between the conveyors or by electronic gearing of the respective motors. Alternatively, an as illustrated in
The driven flat-belts utilize known driven roller technologies, including center-drive pulley mechanisms, whereby more than 180° of contact is maintained between each conveyor's driving pulley and belt, increasing the amount of force that may be delivered to the belt.
In another exemplary configuration, the side flat belts are disposed substantially orthogonal relative to the upper and lower flat belts such that their bearing surfaces face each other, and are in a plane substantially perpendicular to the plane of the bearing surfaces of the upper and lower belts, as illustrated in
Mold-Belts
The contoured mold-belts are relatively thick belts with a rubbery face material attached to a fiber-reinforced backing or carcass as shown in
Each profile mold-belt travels beyond the ends of the surrounding flat-belt conveyors to a separate set of large pulleys or rollers that maintain tension and the relative position of each belt. In one embodiment, the mold-belts are un-powered, functioning as idlers or slave belts to the powered flat belts behind them. In another embodiment, the mold belts are separately powered.
The temperature of the mold belts can be adjusted during production in the event that additional heat is needed or surplus heat is to be removed. If the temperature of the belt surface is adjusted, temperature controlled air is blown onto the belt surfaces as the belts exit the flat-belted conveyor enclosure and follow their return path to the entrance of the forming machine. In one embodiment, infrared or other radiant heaters are used to increase the temperature of the mold surface. In another embodiment, temperature controlled air or other fluid is routed through the conveyor frames to maintain predetermined process temperatures.
Orientation
As described above, the exemplary orientation of the forming system is for the contact surface between mold-belts to be horizontal. The gap between the upper and lower flat-belted conveyors (those conveyors adjacent to the backs of the mold-belts), can be precisely maintained such that the pair of mold-belts pass between them without being allowed to separate (presenting a gap to the molding material) and without excessively compressing the mold-belt shoulders or side walls. In the exemplary embodiment, the upper conveyor is removable while not in operation in order to permit replacement of the mold belts.
Side Conveyors
The flat-belted conveyors adjacent to the sides of the profile mold belts provide structural support for the sides of the mold cavity, resist any deflection of the sides due to foaming pressure, and maintain alignment of the mold-belts. These side-supporting conveyors permit the use of thinner mold-belt sidewalls, which reduces the cost and mass of the mold-belts. The use of these side-supporting conveyors also permits the molding of deeper product cross sections without requiring excessive mold-belt widths.
System Versatility
An exemplary configuration for the flat-belted conveyors is for the top and bottom conveyors to be wide, with the side conveyors sized to fit between the belts of the upper and lower conveyors in such a way that the surface of the upper and lower (wide) belts approach or make contact with the edges of the side belts. The frames, pulleys, and slider-beds of the side conveyors are slightly narrower than their respective belts to avoid contact with the upper and lower belts. A cross section of this exemplary configuration is shown in
To further increase the versatility of the forming machine, the side conveyor belts, pulleys, and slider beds are replaced with taller or shorter components and the gap between upper and lower conveyors adjusted accordingly. This feature permits the forming machine to accommodate mold-belts of various depths to produce thicker or thinner cross sections.
Four-Belt Mode
The specific exemplary embodiments described above with respect to the drawings generally relate to configuration of the system in “six belt mode.” In other words, an upper and lower flat belt, two side flat belts, and an upper and lower profile mold belt. The mold belts permit surface details, corner radii, irregular thicknesses, and deeper surface texture to be molded into the continuously formed product. However, for rectangular or square cross-sectioned products that do not require corner radii, deep texture, or localized features, the forming system is used without mold-belts, and operated in “four belt mode.” In this exemplary operating configuration the four flat belts make direct contact with the moldable product and permits the product to form within the flat-sided cavity. When the forming system is used in this configuration it is important that the upper and lower belts maintain contact with the edges of the side belts to prevent seepage of the material between adjacent belts. In order to produce thicker or thinner products in “four belt mode” the side flat belts, adjacent slider beds, and side belt pulleys are replaced with components in the target thickness. The gap between side belts is adjusted to accommodate the target width. Using this approach a large variety of four-sided cross-sections can be produced by the same machine without the added cost of dedicated mold-belts.
The four belt configuration is illustrated in
Fabrication
The forming system structure may be fabricated using metal materials and typical metal forming and fabricating methods such as welding, bending, machining, and mechanical assembly.
The forming system is used to form a wide variety of moldable materials, and has been found to be particularly suitable for forming synthetic lumber.
Although the descriptions above describe many specific details they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention or the methods of use, but merely providing illustration of some of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention.
This a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/764,013, filed Jan. 23, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,206 on May 1, 2007 and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
529535 | Smith | Nov 1894 | A |
2817875 | Harris et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
3065500 | Berner | Nov 1962 | A |
3528126 | Ernst et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3566448 | Ernst | Mar 1971 | A |
3726624 | Schwarz | Apr 1973 | A |
3736081 | Yovanovich | May 1973 | A |
3768937 | Haga et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3816043 | Snelling et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3824057 | Kornylak et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3841390 | DiBenedetto et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3867494 | Rood et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3878027 | Troutner | Apr 1975 | A |
3890077 | Holman | Jun 1975 | A |
3910179 | Troutner | Oct 1975 | A |
3917774 | Sagane et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3981654 | Rood et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3999320 | Bruning et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4042314 | Bruning et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4060579 | Schmitzer et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4078032 | Wenner | Mar 1978 | A |
4104094 | Peterson | Aug 1978 | A |
4107248 | Schlieckmann | Aug 1978 | A |
4120626 | Keller | Oct 1978 | A |
4127040 | Moore et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4128369 | Kemerer | Dec 1978 | A |
4143759 | Paradis | Mar 1979 | A |
4149840 | Tippmann | Apr 1979 | A |
4164439 | Coonrod | Aug 1979 | A |
4214864 | Tabler | Jul 1980 | A |
4276337 | Coonrod | Jun 1981 | A |
4290248 | Kemerer et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4330494 | Iwata et al. | May 1982 | A |
4347281 | Futcher et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4382056 | Coonrod | May 1983 | A |
4383818 | Swannell | May 1983 | A |
4395214 | Phipps et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4396791 | Mazzoni | Aug 1983 | A |
4450133 | Cafarelli | May 1984 | A |
4489023 | Proksa | Dec 1984 | A |
4512942 | Babbin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4532098 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4540357 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4597927 | Zeitler et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4717027 | Laure et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4832183 | Lapeyre | May 1989 | A |
4948859 | Echols et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4995801 | Hehl | Feb 1991 | A |
5149722 | Soukup | Sep 1992 | A |
5229138 | Carotti | Jul 1993 | A |
5330341 | Kemerer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5340300 | Saeki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5375988 | Klahre | Dec 1994 | A |
5453231 | Douglas | Sep 1995 | A |
5458477 | Kemerer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5495640 | Mullet et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505599 | Kemerer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522446 | Mullet et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527172 | Graham, Jr. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562141 | Mullet et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566740 | Mullet et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582840 | Pauw et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5700495 | Kemerer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5782283 | Kendall | Jul 1998 | A |
5836499 | Mullet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844015 | Steilen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5934352 | Morgan | Aug 1999 | A |
6000102 | Lychou | Dec 1999 | A |
6019269 | Mullet et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6086802 | Levera et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6234777 | Sperry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6264462 | Gallagher | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6312244 | Levera et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321904 | Mitchell | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343924 | Klepsch | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6467610 | MacLachlan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6571935 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578619 | Wright | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6605343 | Motoi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616886 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617009 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641384 | Bosler et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7211206 | Brown et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20010009683 | Kitahama et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20050011159 | Standal et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050161855 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050287238 | Taylor | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060071369 | Butteriss | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070052128 | Taylor | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
23 51 844 | Apr 1975 | DE |
01152306 | May 1969 | GB |
55-80456 | Jun 1980 | JP |
2002-0086327 | Nov 2002 | KR |
WO 9711114 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9808893 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9939891 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 2004-113248 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005072187 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005072187 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060273486 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10764013 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11417385 | US |