The present disclosure relates generally to methods and apparatus for measuring the level of the liquid in the container. More specifically, embodiments of the disclosure relate to the measurement of liquid levels in temperature controlled chemicals using magnetic sensors.
Many processes, for example, semiconductor manufacturing, use methods and apparatus to measure the amount of a liquid or a fluid within a container. Conventional systems and methods of detecting the level of liquid in an ampoule are invasive and only provide discrete points (ultra-sonic and reed switch). A failure of a level sensor would require the ampoule to be returned to the chemical supplier.
Conventional apparatus suffer from several issues that affect the accuracy of the measurements. Variations in the magnetic field which affect the results can occur from, for example, variations of the horizontal position of the floating magnet, orientation of the poles of the floating magnet, and variation of the magnetic field due to variation of magnetic properties of the materials and/or chemical ampule or temperature.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for apparatus and methods to accurately and repeatedly measuring the level of a fluid within a container.
One or more embodiments of the disclosure are directed to level measurement systems comprising a canister comprising a sidewall, a top and a bottom defining an interior volume to contain a fluid. A floating magnet is within the interior volume. At least two magnetic sensors are outside of the canister and adjacent the sidewall.
Additional embodiments of the disclosure are directed to level measurement systems comprising a precursor ampoule comprising a canister with a sidewall, a top and a bottom defining an interior volume to contain a precursor. A floating magnet is within the interior volume of the ampoule. The floating magnet has a density lower than a density of the precursor. A heater is outside of the canister and adjacent the sidewall. At least four magnetic sensors are outside of the canister and adjacent the sidewall. A microprocessor is connected to each of the magnetic sensors.
Further embodiments of the disclosure are directed to methods of measuring a fluid level in a canister. A plurality of magnetic sensors are calibrated. The calibrated sensors are positioned adjacent the canister. The canister has a fluid and a floating magnet within an interior volume thereof. A magnetic field from the floating magnet is measured using the plurality of calibrated magnetic sensors. A position of the floating magnet is determined within the canister based on an output of the calibrated magnetic sensors.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Before describing several exemplary embodiments of the disclosure, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to the details of construction or process steps set forth in the following description. The disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways.
Some embodiments incorporate an ampoule magnet which floats inside the ampoule with magnetic sensors outside the ampoule. Systems of this sort have low accuracy because replacement of an empty ampoule with a new one does not allow for calibration of the level measurement because parameters of the floating magnet (e.g., position of magnet with respect to the sensors) will vary from ampoule to ampoule. Other variables include, but are not limited to, magnetic permeability of the stainless steel used in ampoule which may change from ampoule to ampoule. Therefore, the level measured by the sensor magnetic field will vary even at the same level of liquid in ampoule.
A heater 210 surrounds the canister 201. The heater 210 creates a temperature gradient between the upper region 206 and the lower region 207 in the interior volume 205 of the canister 201. The heater 210 elevates the temperature of a precursor 220 to generate a precursor gas by sublimating or vaporizing the precursor 220 so that gaseous precursor accumulates in the upper region 206 of the canister 201. The gaseous precursor can be swept out of the canister 201 by an inert carrier gas entering through inlet port 230 and exiting outlet port 240. While the inlet port 230 is shown extending into the upper region 206 and the outlet port 240 is shown extending into the lower region 207, those skilled in the art will understand that the inlet port 230 and outlet port 240 can extend to any suitable depth within the interior volume 205 of the canister 201. For example, in some embodiments, the inlet port 230 extends into the lower region 207 of the canister 201 to allow the inert gas to bubble through or pass through the precursor 220. In one or more embodiments, the inlet port 230 extends into the lower region 207 of the canister 201 and may contact the precursor 220. In some embodiments, the outlet port 240 extends into the upper region 206 of the canister 201 and does not contact the precursor 220. In one or more embodiments, the outlet port 240 extends into the lower region 207 of the canister 201 and may contact the precursor 220.
The heater 210 can be any suitable heater including, but not limited to, resistive heaters. In some embodiments, the precursor 220 is heated to a predefined temperature by a heater 210 disposed proximate to the sidewall 202. In some embodiments, the heater 210 is configured to create a temperature gradient between a lower region 207 of the canister 201 and the upper region 206 of the canister 201. The lower region 207 can be colder than or warmer than the upper region 206. The temperature gradient may range from about 5° C. to about 15° C.
A floating magnet 260 is within the canister 201. The floating magnet 260 can be made of any suitable material. In some embodiments, the floating magnet 260 has a density less than the precursor 220. The size of the floating magnet 260 can be any suitable size. For example, the length of the floating magnet 260 is less than the distance between the side walls 202 of the canister 201. The strength of the magnetic field 262 of the floating magnet 260 is sufficient to be measured outside of the canister 201.
The floating magnet 260 can be free floating within the canister 201 or can be partially fixed in place. In some embodiments, the magnet is allowed to float on the precursor without additional structural support. In some embodiments, as shown in
Magnetic sensors 270a, 270b, 270c are located outside the canister 201. The number of magnetic sensors can vary depending on, for example, the magnetic field 262 strength of the floating magnet 260 and the height of the canister 201 (i.e., the length of the sidewall 202 of the canister 201). In some embodiments, there are at least three magnetic sensors. In some embodiments, there are at least four magnetic sensors. In various embodiments, there are in the range of about 2 to about 10 magnetic sensors, or in the range of about 3 to about 9 magnetic sensors, or in the range of about 4 to about 8 magnetic sensors.
The magnetic sensors 270 can be any suitable magnetic sensor. Suitable sensors include, but are not limited to, MEMS-based magnetic field sensors. An exemplary magnetic sensor for use with embodiments of the disclosure is a Hall effect sensor. A Hall effect sensor is a transducer which provides a variable voltage output as a function of or in response to a magnetic field.
The spacing between the magnetic sensors 270 can be varied. The distance between adjacent sensors should be great enough to show a measurable difference between the magnetic field when the floating magnet is asymmetrically positioned. Therefore, the distance between the magnetic sensors may be a function of, at least, the dynamic operating range of the sensors. The spacing and number of magnetic sensors may also be based on the magnetic field strength of the floating magnet. The higher the magnetic field strength, the less magnetic sensors may be used. A floating magnet with a lower magnetic field strength may use a larger number of magnetic sensors than a higher field magnet. In some embodiments, the number of magnetic sensors is based on the height of the ampoule so that there are a fixed number of sensors per unit height. In one or more embodiments, magnetic sensors are positioned in the range of 0.5 inch to 2.5 inches apart, or in the range of about 1 inch to about 2 inches apart, or in the range of about 1 cm to about 7.5 cm apart, or in the range of about 2 cm to about 5 cm apart.
A microprocessor 280 is connected to the magnetic sensors 270a, 270b, 270c. The microprocessor 280 can be any suitable microprocessor that can obtain measurements from the magnetic sensors. The microprocessor 280 can be a stand-alone component or part of a larger processing system.
Referring to
In use, the floating magnet 260 creates magnetic field 262 which can be measured by at least two of magnetic sensors 270a, 270b, 270c. In the embodiment shown in
With reference to
In one or more embodiments, the variation of the X-Y position of the permanent magnet 401 within the canister 201 has substantially no effect on the determination of the z-position of the magnet. In some embodiments, the variation of the X-Y magnet position equally affects the adjacent sensors. For example, in some embodiments, the accuracy of the calculation of the magnet position is independent of the absolute value of the magnetic field measurements.
Referring to
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “certain embodiments,” “one or more embodiments” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases such as “in one or more embodiments,” “in certain embodiments,” “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment of the invention. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the method and apparatus of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention include modifications and variations that are within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/263,737, filed Dec. 6, 2015, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2920484 | Reichert | Jan 1960 | A |
4194397 | Yasuda | Mar 1980 | A |
4275774 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4447743 | Bean | May 1984 | A |
4457171 | Gebauer | Jul 1984 | A |
4466284 | Dumery | Aug 1984 | A |
4796472 | Lew | Jan 1989 | A |
4955231 | Mahoney | Sep 1990 | A |
5056049 | O'Neill | Oct 1991 | A |
5253521 | Abramovich | Oct 1993 | A |
5347864 | Senghaas | Sep 1994 | A |
5565687 | Berrill | Oct 1996 | A |
5636548 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5793200 | Berrill | Aug 1998 | A |
5860316 | Berrill | Jan 1999 | A |
5950487 | Maresca, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
6028521 | Issachar | Feb 2000 | A |
6067855 | Brown et al. | May 2000 | A |
6430380 | Kawakami | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6502461 | Keller | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6539796 | Shirai | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563306 | Sato | May 2003 | B2 |
7597758 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7775508 | Choi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8237443 | Hopmann | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8549911 | Rudd | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9335201 | Huang | May 2016 | B2 |
9506994 | Mulholland | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10712194 | Payne | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10859399 | Burgess | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20020005715 | Sato | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020145210 | Tompkins | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050028841 | Zorich | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050056092 | Kowalski | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109105 | Kowalski | May 2005 | A1 |
20050249873 | Sarigiannis | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070186648 | Harmon | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080099933 | Choi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149031 | Chu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182425 | Spohn | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080213476 | Spohn | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090011129 | Ganguli | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036796 | Rising et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060546 | Tanaka | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100000317 | Bron | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100112215 | Cuvalci | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119734 | Choi | May 2010 | A1 |
20110138907 | Rudd | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120279295 | D'Angelo | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130049743 | Sawano | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130111987 | Ciani | May 2013 | A1 |
20130319015 | Carlson | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140242806 | Knapp | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150153214 | Huang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160052655 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160123790 | Suk | May 2016 | A1 |
20170074715 | Bartos | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102261 | Payne | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4128178 | Feb 1993 | DE |
2001141547 | May 2001 | JP |
1700380 | Dec 1991 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Austenitic Stainless Steels, Chapter 6 (partial), ASM International, 2008. (Year: 2008). |
“Which Pole Is North”, K&J Magnetics, Aug. 10, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
Official Translation of SU-1700380-A1 which originally published on Dec. 23, 1991. (Year: 1991). |
Machine Translation of DE-4128178-A1 which originally published Feb. 25, 1993. (Year: 1993). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/065076 dated Mar. 17, 2017, 12 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2016/065076 dated Jun. 21, 2018, 9 pages. |
“Is stainless steel non-magnetic?”, British Stainless Steel Association,Frequently Asked Questions—Technical Help, https://www.bssa.org.uk/faq.php?id=24, Retrieved on Jun. 26, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170160123 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62263737 | Dec 2015 | US |