This invention relates generally to internal combustion engines, in particular to automatic valve timing adjustment for such engines.
Reciprocating internal combustion engines are used in most motor vehicles. They have an engine bock with one or more cylinders, each containing a reciprocating piston. Each cylinder has above the piston two openings that are opened and closed by two respective valves: an intake valve to admit a fuel-air mixture in and an exhaust valve to let exhaust gases out. After the fuel-air mixture is admitted, a spark from a spark plug ignites it so that the mixture expands rapidly (explodes) to force the piston down. The piston turns a crankshaft, which is connected through a transmission to the vehicle's wheels so as to controllably propel the vehicle. A linkage comprising a timing belt or chain is connected between the crankshaft and two camshafts so that the crankshaft turns the camshafts. The camshafts have lobes or cams that cam one end of a series of respective rocker arms, causing the rocker arms to reciprocate as the camshaft turns. The other ends of the rocker arms are connected to the valves so as to cause the valves to reciprocate and thereby open and close the openings in the cylinders at the proper times to admit the intake fuel mixture and release the exhaust gases from the cylinders.
In the past, the timing of opening and closing of intake and exhaust valves in such reciprocating internal combustion engines was fixed by the design parameters of the engine. However this compromised engine performance because engine design had to be optimized for use at either low or high rotational speeds (revolutions per minute, RPM).
An engine designed for strong, low-RPM torque will not function optimally at high-RPM. Conversely, an engine designed to deliver strong torque at high-RPM usually provided poor low-RPM performance. In addition to poor power performance, an engine operating at less than optimal efficiency tended to produce excessive amounts of pollutant gases, notably oxides of nitrogen.
A principal difference between these two engine designs (optimized for low or high RPM torque) lies in the timing of the operation of the intake and exhaust valves. This timing is determined by the camshafts, which have a cam lobe for each rocker arm and valve.
The time at which a valve opens or closes with respect to the crankshaft position can be equated to the angular position of each valve. The relative angular relationship between the intake and exhaust valves, or between their respective camshafts, is generally referred to as the “phase angle” or simply “phase” of one shaft with respect to the other. As stated, each lobe on the camshaft bears on one end of a rocker arm. The rocker arm is spring-loaded against the lobe. The rocker arm pivots around a central bearing. The other end of the rocker arm presses on a tappet or spring-loaded valve stem in well-known fashion, thus opening and closing the valve at predetermined times.
As stated, each cylinder usually has two valves, an intake valve and an exhaust valve. Either one valve only can be open at a time, or both valves can be open at certain times. The time during which both valves are open is referred to as valve-opening overlap. If the valves have very little overlap the engine will have a smooth idle and good low-RPM torque, but impaired high-RPM performance. A large amount of overlap allows excellent engine breathing (passage of pre-combustion or post-combustion components) and high performance at high-RPM, but causes a rough idle and poor performance at low RPM.
Prior-art engines frequently included more than one camshaft each for the intake and the exhaust valves, as in double overhead cam designs. However the principles discussed above are the same. In addition, the principles discussed apply to engines with one or more cylinders or more than one intake and one exhaust valve per cylinder.
Prior-Art
Varying Overlap with Multiple Intake Camshafts
Honda Motor Company, Ltd. (Honda) of Tokyo, Japan employs an electronic and mechanical system that uses multiple intake valve camshafts. Engines with Honda's “Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control” system have an extra, secondary intake camshaft with its own rocker arms. When engaged, the secondary camshaft causes the open periods of the intake and exhaust valves to overlap.
At low engine speeds, the secondary camshaft is disengaged. A primary camshaft causes the intake and exhaust valves to operate without overlap. At high engine speeds, the secondary camshaft is engaged, causing operation of the two valves to overlap. While this system works well at low and high engine speeds, it does not smoothly transition at intermediate speeds. Thus engine performance is not optimized at such intermediate speeds.
Prior-Art
Varying Overlap with Separate Intake and Exhaust Camshafts
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,231,330 (1980), Garcea teaches a system for timing the opening and closing of intake and exhaust valves in an engine with a separate camshaft for each. His system operates at two extremes. At low RPM, the relative positions of the valves assume one value. At high RPM, the relative positions of the valves assume a second value. The change in relative positions from one value to the other occurs at an intermediate, predetermined engine speed.
As in the Honda system, the valve positions abruptly shift from the low-speed value to the high-speed value, with no smooth transition over a range of engine speeds. Garcea states that while a system providing a smooth transition would be preferable, it would have to be very complicated to ensure that the timing corresponded to the rotational speed with sufficient accuracy. Thus, while his engine operates optimally at both ends of its speed range, no provision is made for mid-range engine speeds.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,074 (1983), Garcea teaches a similar system with two speed thresholds. Below a first predetermined engine speed, the relative positions of the intake and exhaust valves assume a first value. Above the first engine speed and below a second predetermined engine speed, the relative positions of the intake and exhaust valves assume a second value. Above the second engine speed, the relative positions of the intake and exhaust valves assume the first value again.
In his second system, Garcea adjusts valve timing for three engine speed ranges. Again, however, this system makes abrupt changes from one valve timing differential value to another. The transition between the three speed ranges is abrupt so that valve timing is less than optimal at many engine speeds. In this second patent, Garcea repeats his statement that a system that provides a smooth transition would be excessively complicated.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,712 (1984), Stojek et al. teach a system with a helical pinion apparatus mounted on one or two camshafts. In response to control signals derived from engine speed and load, the apparatus causes advancement or retardation of camshaft position. The result is optimal engine performance at all speeds and loads. While this apparatus modulates valve positions optimally, its construction is complex and hence expensive and unreliable.
Prior-Art
Gear-less Mechanisms
In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,494,495 (1985) and 4,494,496 (1985), Nakamura et al. teach two gear-less mechanisms for continuously varying camshaft angles. As with Garcea and Stojek, Nakamura's mechanisms are attached to the end of the camshaft. As in the case of Stojek, Nakamura's system is mechanically complex.
Prior-Art
Wedge-activated Mechanism
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,033,327 (1991), Lichti et al. teach a sprocket-driven mechanism attached to the end of a camshaft. This mechanism comprises the sprocket, an assembly of paired wedges, and an associated plunger. In the absence of forcing by the plunger, the wedges assume a rest position. When the wedges are at rest, the camshaft angle remains at a first predetermined value. The plunger is energized in proportion to engine speed by engine oil pressure. When energized, it moves the wedges and changes the phase angle between the sprocket and the camshaft, thus varying engine valve timing. However this system is also complex.
Prior-Art
Geared Mechanism
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,361,736 (1994), Phoenix et al. teach a geared mechanism for varying the phase angle of a camshaft with respect to a crankshaft. While this mechanism is workable, it is also mechanically complex.
Prior-Art
Quill Shaft Mechanism
Regueiro, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,522 (2001), teaches a camshaft phasing mechanism employing a quill shaft formed with helical splines. The actuator assembly is mounted at the front end of the camshaft, while the control unit is mounted at the rear end of the camshaft. Although this system is workable, it is mechanically complex. Additionally, it occupies space at both the front and back ends of the camshaft.
Advantages
Accordingly, one advantage of one aspect is to provide an improved method and apparatus for optimizing valve opening times, particularly by varying the phase angle of a camshaft with respect to a crankshaft. Other advantages of one or more aspects are to provide an inexpensive and simple apparatus, which has few moving parts, can be adapted to existing engine designs, provides continuous, precise adjustment of the valve phase angle for all speeds, and which occupies little space at one end of the engine. Additional advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description.
A method and apparatus provide precise, continuous control over valve overlap in an internal combustion engine. The apparatus is compact and comprises very few components. It is not mounted on the end of the camshaft, as are most prior-art mechanisms. Instead, it is located at the front of the engine. A hydraulic actuator reconfigures the shape of the engine's timing chain or belt to vary valve timing. Adjusting the chain or belt appropriately varies the camshaft position with respect to the crankshaft position, and thus the timing of the valves' opening and closing. This will cause the engine to have better performance at both low and high RPM. The result is a simplified engine with superior power output and lower emissions at all speeds.
Figures
Reference Numerals
Preferred Embodiment at Low-And High-RPM Conditions
A crankshaft pulley 10 is attached to the engine's crankshaft 12 and has two sprocket wheels or two sets of teeth (rear set not shown) that drive two timing linkages comprising chains or belts (hereinafter belts) 14 and 16. Arrows (
Belt 14 is an exhaust timing belt since it engages exhaust sprocket wheel 18, which is fixed to an exhaust-valve camshaft 20. Camshaft 20 has one or more cam lobes 22, each associated with a particular cylinder and piston (not shown) in the engine. As camshaft 20 rotates, lobes 22 cam rocker arms in a reciprocating manner and the rocker arms in turn cause the engine's exhaust valves to open and close in synchrony with their associated piston. (The rocker arms, valves, pistons, and cylinders are not shown but are well known.)
Belt 16 is an intake timing belt since it drives an intake sprocket wheel 24, fixedly attached to an intake camshaft 26. Camshaft 26 has one or more cam lobes 28. As camshaft 26 rotates, lobes 28 engage rocker arms (not shown) which in turn cause the engine's intake valve(s) to open and close, also in synchrony with their associated piston.
Intake belt 16 passes around a tensioner 30 (indicated by a dashed outline in
A fourth or idler wheel 44 also engages intake belt 16. Wheel 44 has sprockets and rotates on a bearing 46 which is secured to an arm 48. Arm 48 rotatably pivots on a bearing 50, also secured to the front of block 64.
An extension 49 of arm 48 is pivotally attached to a clevis 52 by a pin 54. Clevis 52 is attached to a piston shaft 56, which is mounted in a hydraulic cylinder 58. Cylinder 58 is pivotally attached to block 64 by pin 60. Cylinder 58 is supplied with the engine's lubricating oil (not shown) via a tube 59, which is connected to the engine's oil pump (not shown). The oil pressure increases with increasing engine speed. Thus cylinder 58 urges clevis 52 toward arm 48 with increasing force as engine speed increases.
When sufficient oil pressure is present (high engine speed), the oil pressure in tube 59 and cylinder 58 increases, causing piston shaft 56 and clevis 52 to exert sufficient force to cause arm 48 to pivot in a clockwise (CW) direction around pivot 50. As a result, idler wheel 44 will force the right side of intake belt 16 to deform or bow outwardly, as shown in
The force of idler wheel 44 on belt 16 will increase the tension in belt 16, causing the portion of belt 16 at tensioner 30 to straighten, as also shown in
When oil pressure decreases (low engine speed), the pressure in tube 59 and cylinder 58 decreases so that belt 16 will force idler wheel 44 to the left and arm 48 will pivot CCW. The tension on the belt decreases so that spring 40 can pivot bracket 32 CCW. Tensioner 30 with spring 40 will restore the bends in belt 16 as shown in
To recapitulate, at low RPM (
Preferred Embodiment at Advanced Condition (High RPM)
Assume that the previously described mechanical timing components of the engine are running at high RPM as shown in
High oil pressure in the engine causes cylinder 58 to force arm 48 to rotate CW around pivot 50. Idler wheel 44 has moved to the right, forcing the right side of belt 16 into a new, bowed-out configuration. Spring 40 has been extended, allowing tensioner bracket 32 to rotate CW, yet still maintain tension on belt 16.
In its new configuration, belt 16 causes intake sprocket wheel 24 and thus intake camshaft 26 to advance or rotate an additional amount CW, relative to the position of crankshaft 12. Thus the angular relationship between intake and exhaust camshafts 26 and 20 has changed. The angular relation between crankshaft 12 and exhaust camshaft 20 remains unchanged, however.
As stated,
At high speed (
At intermediate engine speeds (not shown), the oil pressure in the engine assumes an intermediate value. In turn, cylinder 58 exerts an intermediate force on arm 48, causing an intermediate change in the overlap angle. The mechanical components are arranged so that engine operation is optimized at all speeds.
Timing Diagrams
At idle (
Specifically, the first section, labeled Exhaust Valve, extends from 270° to 0° or 360°. During this interval, the crankshaft causes the piston, whose position is indicated by the broken line, to move upwardly from an instantaneously stopped position at the lowest point in the cylinder (called BDC for Bottom Dead Center). The piston moves upwardly to its highest point in the cylinder where it also stops instantaneously (called TDC for Top Dead Center). During this interval the exhaust valve, indicated by the solid line, moves from closed to open and then closed again. While the valve is open, the piston's upward movement forces out the gases produced by combustion. The intake valve is closed during this time. As a result, there is no overlap between the opening of the exhaust and intake valves, so that exhaust gases are kept separate from the intake air for more stable combustion. I.e., the intake valve's opening is fully retarded with respect to the exhaust valve. The engine will thus have a smooth idle and good low-RPM torque.
In the second section of
During the next and third section of
During the last and fourth section of
At high speeds (
In the second section of
In the third and fourth sections both valves remain closed, as with the low-speed operation of
As discussed above, at intermediate speeds, valve overlap assumes an intermediate value related to engine speed. The result is optimal engine performance at all speeds.
First Alternative Embodiment
At high engine speeds, the oil pressure in tube 59 increases, forcing piston 56 out of cylinder 58, in turn forcing support arm 48 to rotate CW and causing sprocket wheel 44 to move to the right. This causes belt 15 to bow out to the right, not shown in
Second Alternative Embodiment
Specifically, the upper end of arm 48′ is connected to adjusting sprocket wheel 44 as before, but piston 56 is connected directly to the upper end of arm 48′ at its connection to wheel 44. Arm 48′ is pivoted at its center on pivot 50 so that arm 48′ serves as a see-saw pivot arm. The lower end of arm 48′ is connected to a sprocketless idler wheel 45, which is positioned on the side of belt 16 opposite wheel 44. When oil pressure increases due to a higher engine RPM, piston 56 will extend out as before, pushing wheel 44 to the right as before. However since wheel 44 is pivotally connected to wheel 45 by seesaw pivot arm 48′, when wheel 44 moves to the right, arm 48′ will cause idler wheel 45 to move to the left. As a result, wheels 44 and 45 will cause belt 16 to bow to the right at wheel 44 and to the left at wheel 45, thus effectively shortening the belt and advancing the timing of both the intake and exhaust valves as in
Third Alternative Embodiment
In the third alternative embodiment of
Specifically, the upper end of arm 48″ is connected to adjusting sprocket wheel 44 and piston 56 is connected directly to the upper end of arm 48″ at its connection to wheel 44 as before. Arm 48″ is pivoted at its bottom end on pivot 50 so that entire arm 48″ pivots on pivot 50. The lower end of arm 48″ is connected to fixed sprocketless idler wheel 45, which is positioned on the side of belt 16′ opposite wheel 44. When oil pressure increases due to a higher engine RPM, piston 56 will extend out as before, pushing wheel 44 to the right as before. When wheel 44 moves to the right, it will cause belt 16′ to bow out to the right, as with the embodiment of
The present system provides a novel method and apparatus for varying valve position in reciprocating internal combustion engines. The device optimizes valve opening times, by varying the phase angle of the camshaft with respect to the crankshaft. The apparatus is inexpensive and simple, has few moving parts, can be adapted to existing engine designs, provides continuous, precise adjustment of the valve phase angle, is reliable, and occupies little space at one end of the engine.
While the above description contains many specificities, these should not be considered limiting but merely exemplary. Many variations and ramifications are possible. —For example instead of being driven in response to oil pressure, the system can be controlled by electrical signals representative of engine speed and load. Instead of a hydraulic cylinder, another motive source can be used to change the path of the intake belt including a pneumatic cylinder, a stepper motor, a gear motor, a system of pulleys and levers driven by a motive force, or even a manually operated positioner. Instead of varying the position of the intake valve, the exhaust valve position can be changed with respect to the intake valve and piston. Instead of causing the timing belt to bow in response to increasing engine speed, the mechanism can be arranged so that the timing belt is bowed at idle speed and is allowed to straighten at idle speed so as to cause a concomitant advance at high speed. Instead of varying only the intake valve position, both the intake and exhaust valve positions can be changed using two similar mechanisms. Instead of using a sprocket wheel for idler wheel 44 (which bears against the intake belt), a smooth wheel or pulley can be used. Instead of using arm 48 to hold idler wheel 44, this wheel can be mounted on a bearing that is attached directly to shaft 56 of cylinder 58 so that increased oil pressure in response to increasing engine speed will force shaft 56 out of cylinder 58, in turn forcing wheel 44 to bow belt 16 outwardly as before. In the embodiment of
While the present system employs elements which are well known to those skilled in the art of internal combustion engine design, it combines these elements in a novel way which produces a new result not heretofore discovered. Accordingly the scope of this invention should be determined, not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This patent is based upon an application that is a continuation-in-part of parent application Ser. No. 11/054,689, filed 2005 Feb. 8, now abandoned. This parent application claims priority of my provisional patent application, Ser. No. 60/622,190, filed 2004 Oct. 26.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1061098 | McKeen | May 1913 | A |
1220124 | Hoffner | Mar 1917 | A |
1358188 | Brewer | Nov 1920 | A |
1632223 | Fey | Aug 1927 | A |
1787717 | Boulet | Jan 1931 | A |
2060580 | Chapelle | Nov 1936 | A |
2121560 | Duncan | Jun 1938 | A |
2159017 | Duncan | May 1939 | A |
2191459 | Duncan | Feb 1940 | A |
2305787 | Kales | Dec 1942 | A |
2682260 | Lantz | Jun 1954 | A |
2685281 | MacGregor | Aug 1954 | A |
2804081 | Gamble | Aug 1957 | A |
2839036 | Strang | Jun 1958 | A |
2861557 | Stolte | Nov 1958 | A |
2890594 | Hellmann | Jun 1959 | A |
2969051 | Webster | Jan 1961 | A |
2980089 | Sampietro | Apr 1961 | A |
3004410 | Pierce | Oct 1961 | A |
3106195 | Hanley | Oct 1963 | A |
3144009 | Goodfellow et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3301010 | Vernick | Jan 1967 | A |
3308797 | Buyetti et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3369532 | McIlroy | Feb 1968 | A |
3401572 | Bailey | Sep 1968 | A |
3481314 | Le Crenn | Dec 1969 | A |
3499347 | Pearson | Mar 1970 | A |
3502059 | Davis et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3516394 | Nichols | Jun 1970 | A |
3523485 | Harrell | Aug 1970 | A |
3633554 | Nakajima et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3721220 | Garcea | Mar 1973 | A |
3800825 | Seino et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3807243 | Yada | Apr 1974 | A |
3827413 | Meacham | Aug 1974 | A |
3888216 | Miokovic | Jun 1975 | A |
3888217 | Hisserich | Jun 1975 | A |
3945221 | Miokovic | Mar 1976 | A |
3945355 | Calviac | Mar 1976 | A |
3978829 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4091776 | Clemens et al. | May 1978 | A |
4096836 | Kopich | Jun 1978 | A |
4177773 | Cribbs | Dec 1979 | A |
4231330 | Garcea | Nov 1980 | A |
4302985 | Natkin | Dec 1981 | A |
4305352 | Oshima et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4421074 | Garcea et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4463712 | Stojek et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4481912 | Stwiorok et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4494495 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4494496 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4517934 | Papez | May 1985 | A |
4535731 | Banfi | Aug 1985 | A |
4545338 | Allred | Oct 1985 | A |
4561390 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4580533 | Oda et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4627825 | Bruss et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4696265 | Nohira | Sep 1987 | A |
4754727 | Hampton | Jul 1988 | A |
4762097 | Baker | Aug 1988 | A |
4805566 | Ampferer | Feb 1989 | A |
4811698 | Akasaka et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4841924 | Hampton et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4856465 | Denz et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4873949 | Fujiyoshi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4889086 | Scapecchi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895113 | Speier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4903650 | Ohlendorf et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4967701 | Isogai et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4974560 | King | Dec 1990 | A |
4976229 | Charles | Dec 1990 | A |
4986801 | Ohlendorf et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993370 | Hashiyama et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996955 | Akasaka et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002023 | Butterfield et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5012773 | Akasaka et al. | May 1991 | A |
5031585 | Muir et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033327 | Lichti et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5078647 | Hampton | Jan 1992 | A |
5080055 | Komatsu et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5088456 | Suga | Feb 1992 | A |
5090366 | Gondek | Feb 1992 | A |
5097804 | Brune et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111780 | Hannibal | May 1992 | A |
5117784 | Schechter et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5119691 | Lichti et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5152263 | Danieli | Oct 1992 | A |
5156119 | Suga | Oct 1992 | A |
5159904 | Ingold | Nov 1992 | A |
5161493 | Ma | Nov 1992 | A |
5163872 | Niemiec et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5172661 | Brune et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174253 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181485 | Hirose et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197421 | Hara | Mar 1993 | A |
5203290 | Tsuruta et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203291 | Suga et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219313 | Danieli | Jun 1993 | A |
5234088 | Hampton | Aug 1993 | A |
5326321 | Chang | Jul 1994 | A |
5327859 | Pierik et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5329895 | Nishida et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333579 | Hara et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349929 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355849 | Schiattino | Oct 1994 | A |
5361736 | Phoenix et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365896 | Hara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365898 | Mueller | Nov 1994 | A |
5377638 | Mueller | Jan 1995 | A |
5381764 | Fukuma et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5450825 | Geyer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5494009 | Yamada et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501186 | Hara et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5542383 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553573 | Hara et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557983 | Hara et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592909 | Tsuruta | Jan 1997 | A |
5673659 | Regueiro | Oct 1997 | A |
5680836 | Pierik | Oct 1997 | A |
5680837 | Pierik | Oct 1997 | A |
5687681 | Hara | Nov 1997 | A |
5718196 | Uchiyama et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5803030 | Cole | Sep 1998 | A |
5860328 | Regueiro | Jan 1999 | A |
5979382 | Heer | Nov 1999 | A |
6167854 | Regueiro | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199522 | Regueiro | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216655 | Yoshiki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6640760 | Plasencia | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6746352 | Poiret et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763792 | Okamoto | Jul 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60622190 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11054689 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11286231 | US |