Embodiments of the present invention relate to contortion of an electronic apparatus. In particular, they relate to controlling an apparatus by contorting the apparatus.
There are various different ways in which a user can control an apparatus via a man-machine-interface (MMI). For example, the apparatus may comprise a cursor control device such as a mouse or trackball. For example, the apparatus may have devices that enable tactile actuation such as keys, touch screens etc. For example, the apparatus may have devices that enable audio actuation such as a microphone and voice recognition circuitry.
According to some but not necessarily all examples there may be provided an apparatus comprising: a body configured for resilient contortion from a neutral equilibrium shape by a user, the body having an exterior surface that resiliently contorts in response to user provision of a force, wherein the body defines, proximal to a perimeter of a face of the body, at least a first portion of an exterior surface of the apparatus and a second portion of an exterior surface of the apparatus that opposes the first portion across the face, wherein user provision of a force in a first direction results in a first contortion of the exterior surface and user provision of a force in a second direction, opposite to the first direction, results in a second contortion of the exterior surface; and electronic circuitry including at least a processor configured to provide consistent meaning across a plurality of different software applications for user provision of a force in the first direction to the first portion of the exterior surface and to provide consistent meaning across the plurality of software applications for user provision of a force in the first direction to the second portion of the exterior surface.
According to some but not necessarily all examples there may be provided an apparatus comprising: a body configured for resilient contortion from a neutral equilibrium shape by a user, the body having an exterior surface that resiliently contorts in response to user provision of a force but contorts differentially dependent upon which side of the body the force is provided; wherein the body defines, proximal to a first portion of a perimeter of a first side of a face of the body, first portions of an exterior surface of the apparatus and defines, proximal to a second portion of the perimeter of a second side of the face of the body, at least a second portion of an exterior surface of the apparatus; wherein user provision of a force in a first direction to any of the first portions results in a first contortion of the exterior surface to a different extent than user provision of the same force in the first direction to the second portion; and electronic circuitry including at least a processor configured to provide a first function in response to user provision of a force in a first direction to the first portions and to provide a second function in response to user provision of the same force in the first direction to the second portion.
According to some but not necessarily all examples there may be provided an apparatus comprising: a body configured for resilient contortion from a neutral equilibrium shape, the body having an exterior surface that resiliently contorts in response to provision of a force, wherein the body defines, proximal to a perimeter of a face of the body, at least a first portion of an exterior surface of the apparatus and a second portion of an exterior surface of the apparatus that opposes the first portion across the face, wherein provision of a force in a first direction results in a first contortion of the exterior surface and provision of a force in a second direction, opposite to the first direction, results in a second contortion of the exterior surface; and
electronic circuitry including at least a processor configured to provide consistent meaning across a plurality of different software applications for provision of a force in the first direction to the first portion of the exterior surface and to provide consistent meaning across the plurality of software applications for provision of a force in the first direction to the second portion of the exterior surface.
For a better understanding of various examples of embodiments of the present invention reference will now be made by way of example only to the accompanying drawings in which:
The Figures illustrate an apparatus 2. The apparatus 2 may comprise: a body 20 configured for resilient contortion from a neutral equilibrium shape by a user, the body 20 having an exterior surface 28 that resiliently contorts in response to user provision of a force F. The body defines, proximal to a perimeter 22 of a face 26 of the body 20, at least a first portion (e.g. 24B) of an exterior surface 28 of the apparatus 2 and a second portion (e.g. 24F) of the exterior surface 28 of the apparatus 2 that opposes the first portion across the face 26. User provision of a force 23A in a first direction results in a first contortion 25A of the exterior surface 28 and user provision of a force 23B in a second direction, opposite to the first direction, results in a second contortion 25B of the exterior surface 28. The apparatus 2 comprises electronic circuitry 16 including at least a processor 4 configured to provide consistent meaning across a plurality of different software applications 17 for user provision of a force 23A in the first direction to the first portion (e.g. 24B) of the exterior surface 28 and to provide consistent meaning across the plurality of software applications 17 for user provision of a force 23A in the first direction to the second portion (e.g. 24F) of the exterior surface 28.
As consistent meaning is provided for similar user contortions at similar portions across different applications, the apparatus 2 is easier to use. Consistent meaning implies a consistent effect in the context of the application such as, for example, consistent affirmation of an available option, consistent negation of an available option; or a consistent navigation command.
Contortion is the deformation of the body 20 by twisting and/or bending. The extent of distortion facilitated by the body 20 depends upon implementation. Resilient contortion implies that the body stays in its contorted state while held in that state and returns to its equilibrium shape when released.
An apparatus 2 may be a hand-portable electronic apparatus 2. It may, for example, be an apparatus sized to fit into a jacket pocket or be carried in the palm of a user's hand. The apparatus 2 may be a personal user device such as a mobile cellular telephone, a personal music player, a personal video player, a personal handheld computer, a personal digital assistant or similar.
The electronic circuitry 16 is configured to control the display 14 and user output 8. The electronic circuitry 16 is configured to receive input from the user input 10 and from the sensors 12.
The sensors 12 may be configured and positioned to detect contortions and other deformations of the body 20 by a user. The sensors 12 are configured to detect and enable disambiguation of different contortions of the body 20.
To disambiguate between contortions of different portions 24 is may be necessary to identify which portion(s) is/are most contorted or which portion(s) were first contorted. The sensors 12 may be configured to detect an extent and/or timing of contortion at a portion.
Contortion may include deformations such as bend, torsion, stretch, compression or applied tension such as compression, stretch, shearing, torque. The sensors 12 may, for example, include strain gauges, and force and touch sensors (capacitive, resistive, piezoelectric . . . ).
The electronic circuitry 16 receives an input from the sensors 12, identifies the detected contortion (and perhaps its extent) and controls the operation of the apparatus 2 in dependence upon the detected contortion (and perhaps its extent).
The user input 10 may comprise a device for tactile user input such as a touch screen for the display 14 or a key or keypad and/or it may comprise a device for audio user input such as a microphone.
The user output 10 may comprise a device for visual user input such as lights and/or it may comprise a device for audio user output such as a loudspeaker or headphone socket.
The electronic circuitry 16 may be implemented using instructions that enable hardware functionality, for example, by using executable computer program instructions in a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that may be stored on a computer readable storage medium (disk, memory etc) 6 to be executed by such a processor 4.
In the illustrated example, the electronic circuitry 16 comprises a processor 4 and a memory 6. The processor 4 is configured to read from and write to the memory 6. The processor 4 may also comprise an output interface via which data and/or commands are output by the processor 4 and an input interface via which data and/or commands are input to the processor 4.
The memory 6 stores a plurality of software applications 17. Each software application comprises code which when run by the processor 4 enables a software application. The user is able to provide input to each software application 17 by contorting portions of the apparatus. The meaning (effect) of a particular contortion (e.g. backwards bend) at a particular portion is consistent across the plurality of applications 17.
The memory 6 also stores a computer program 18 comprising computer program instructions that control the operation of the apparatus 2 when loaded into the processor 4. The computer program instructions 18 provide the logic and routines that enables the apparatus to perform, for example, disambiguation of the inputs from the sensors 12 and to consequently control the apparatus 2 in dependence upon the detected contortions The processor 2 by reading the memory 6 is able to load and execute the computer program 18.
Referring to
Although the memory 6 is illustrated as a single component it may be implemented as one or more separate components some or all of which may be integrated/removable and/or may provide permanent/semi-permanent/dynamic/cached storage.
References to ‘computer-readable storage medium’, ‘computer program product’, ‘tangibly embodied computer program’ etc. or a ‘controller’, ‘computer’, ‘processor’ etc. should be understood to encompass not only computers having different architectures such as single/multi-processor architectures and sequential (Von Neumann)/parallel architectures but also specialized circuits such as field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), application specific circuits (ASIC), signal processing devices and other devices. References to computer program, instructions, code etc. should be understood to encompass software for a programmable processor or firmware such as, for example, the programmable content of a hardware device whether instructions for a processor, or configuration settings for a fixed-function device, gate array or programmable logic device etc.
In the illustrated examples, the apparatus 2 is substantially rectangular with rounded corners and the apparatus 2 is used in a landscape orientation with the longest side of the rectangular body 20 extending between the left hand and the right hand of the user. However, different shapes of body may be used such as ellipsoid, circle, ovoid etc
The body 20 has an exterior surface 28 that resiliently contorts in response to user provision of a force F.
The body 20 has a face 26 which is presented to the user. In this example, the face 26 comprises a display 14 which may be flexible. For example, the display 14 may be configured for resilient contortion and may contort as the body contorts. Suitable displays may include organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, polymer organic light emitting diode (P-OLED) displays, light emitting polymer (LEP) displays, flexible liquid crystal displays (e.g. cholesteric liquid crystal or polymer-dispersed liquid crystal), electrophoretic displays or electrowetting displays. In other examples, the display 14 may not be present.
The face 26 has a perimeter 22 and portions 24A-24H of the exterior surface 28 of the body 20 that can be contorted for user input are positioned adjacent the perimeter 22. In this example there is a labelled portion for each edge/vertex of the rectangular face 26. However, it should be appreciated that there may be more, or less distinct portions 24. For example, every vertex and edge may not have an associated distinct portion that can be contorted for user input. For example, an edge may have more than one associated distinct portion that can be contorted for user input at different locations along its length.
In the specific illustrated example, there is a top-right corner portion 24A positioned adjacent a top-right corner of the face 26. There is a right-edge portion 24B positioned adjacent a right-edge of the face 26. There is a bottom-right corner portion 24C positioned adjacent a bottom-right corner of the face 26. There is a bottom-edge portion 24D positioned adjacent a bottom-edge of the face 26. There is a bottom-left corner portion 24E positioned adjacent a bottom-left corner of the face 26. There is a left-edge portion 24F positioned adjacent a left-edge of the face 26. There is a top-left corner portion 24G positioned adjacent a top-left corner of the face 26. There is a top-edge portion 24H positioned adjacent a top-edge of the face 26.
In
In
In
In
In the examples of
In the examples of
For example, backward bending of a particular portion may provide, in each of the plurality of software applications 17, an affirmative command and backward bending of a portion opposing the particular portion may provide, in each of the plurality of applications 17, a negative command.
The particular portion may, for example, be an edge portion 24B, 24D, 24F, 24H and the opposing portion may be an edge portion 24F, 24H, 24B, 24D on the opposite side of the face 28.
The particular portion may, for example, be a corner portion 24A, 24C, 24E, 24G and the opposing portion may be a non-adjacent corner portion 24E, 24G, 24A, 24C that is diagonally opposing across the rectangular face 28.
The particular portion may, for example, be a corner portion 24A, 24C, 24E, 24G and the opposing portion may be an adjacent corner portion 24C, 24E, 24G, 24A that is opposing across an edge of the rectangular face 28.
An affirmative command may result in advancement, for example, through a menu system or in a direction determined by a location of the particular portion.
A negative command may result in retreat, for example, through a menu system or in a direction determined by a location of the opposing portion.
In some examples, forward bending of the particular portion may provide, in each of the plurality of software applications, the negative command and forward bending of the opposing portion may provide, in each of the plurality of applications, the affirmative command.
According to one embodiment, backward bending of a portion 24 may provide, in the plurality of software applications, an affirmative pre-selection navigation command consistent with a location of the portion 24. The portion 24 is located relative to an origin a centre of the face 26 along a vector and the affirmative pre-selection navigation command navigates in a direction of the vector. In some examples, forward bending of the portion may provide, in the plurality of software applications, a negative navigation command consistent with a location of the portion. The negative pre-selection navigation command navigates in a direction opposite to the vector.
The navigation commands associated with the different portions 24 may enable, in the software applications, one or more of: navigating through a hierarchical menu structure; scrolling; panning; and positioning a pointer.
For example, the following table illustrates how a user can input different navigation commands by bending different portions 24A-24H.
An affirmative command input by backward bending the particular portion may consistently complete an action defined by an in-use one of the software applications and a subsequent downward bend of an opposing portion may consistently provide an affirmative command that at least partially undoes the completed action.
For example, the affirmative command:
may be consistently undone, irrespective of software application, by the affirmative command
An affirmative command input by backward bending the particular portion may provide the same command as a negative command input by forward bending the opposing portion.
For example, the affirmative command:
may be consistently the same, irrespective of software application, as the negative command
and may be consistently opposite, irrespective of software application, as the associated affirmative command
If a particular portion and its opposing portion are simultaneously used to provide contradictory commands, that is they are bent in the same direction, then a third meaning can be consistently assigned to this contortion that is different to the meaning consistently assigned to the particular portion when bent in that direction and different to the meaning consistently assigned to the opposing portion when bent in that direction.
For example, the affirmative command:
and the affirmative command
when performed together may provide consistently, irrespective of software application, a different command
For example, the negative command:
and the negative command
when performed together may provide consistently, irrespective of software application, a different command
In the illustrated example, the apparatus 2 has portions 24A, 24B, 24C, 24D and 24H on the right-hand side 31 adjacent the right-side perimeter 22 of the face 26 of the body 20. The apparatus 2 has portions 24E, 24F, 24G, on the left-hand side 33 adjacent the left-side perimeter 22 of the face 26 of the body 20.
The electronic circuitry is configured to provide a first functions in response to backward bending 25B of the right-side portions and a second different function in response to backward bending 25B of the left-side portion(s).
The right-side portions may be contorted as part of a global contortion of the whole apparatus 2. The right side portions include the top edge 24H, the bottom edge 24D and the right-side edge 24C. They may also include the top-right corner 24A and the bottom-right corner 24C.
The right-side portions may be used for pre-selection navigation control as described in the table 1 above. The right-side portions may, for example, provide the functionality of an analog joystick.
Bending down a right-side portion navigates in a direction of a vector defined by the location of that portion. For example, bending the right edge 24B back may navigate right, bending the right edge 24B forward may navigate left, bending top edge 24H back may navigate up, bending the top edge 24H forward may navigate down, bending the bottom edge 24D back may navigate down and bending the bottom edge 24D up may navigate up.
The left-side portion(s) may be contorted as part of a local contortion and not as part of a global contortion of the whole apparatus 2. The left side portion(s) include the left edge 24F. They may also include the top-left corner 24G and the bottom-left corner 24E. The left-side portion may, for example, comprise a rim contorted by bending the rim.
The left-side portion(s) may be used for post-navigation selection.
User provision of a force in a first direction to any of the right-side portions results in a first contortion of the exterior surface 28 to a different extent than user provision of the same force in the first direction to the left-side portion(s). That is the compliance of the portions may be different depending upon location.
The apparatus 2 may be rotatable such that the right-side portions are positioned for use by a user's left-hand in providing the first functions and the left-side portion(s) is positioned for use by a user's right-hand in providing the second function. For example, there may be a detector (e.g. a gyroscope or accelerometer, for example) that detects the orientation of the apparatus and adjusts output on the display accordingly and interprets input from the user via contortion of the apparatus 2 accordingly. It will, for example, be appreciate that the mappings of particular deformations to commands are inverted so that, for the deformations, ‘top’ exchanges with ‘bottom’ and ‘left’ exchanges with ‘right’ when the apparatus is rotated through 180 degrees.
The
In
In
Although embodiments of the present invention have been described in the preceding paragraphs with reference to various examples, it should be appreciated that modifications to the examples given can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as claimed.
Features described in the preceding description may be used in combinations other than the combinations explicitly described.
Although functions have been described with reference to certain features, those functions may be performable by other features whether described or not.
Although features have been described with reference to certain embodiments, those features may also be present in other embodiments whether described or not.
Whilst endeavoring in the foregoing specification to draw attention to those features of the invention believed to be of particular importance it should be understood that the Applicant claims protection in respect of any patentable feature or combination of features hereinbefore referred to and/or shown in the drawings whether or not particular emphasis has been placed thereon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1410366 | Buchman | Mar 1922 | A |
1619502 | Fox | Mar 1927 | A |
2311470 | Ritter | Feb 1943 | A |
3148724 | Chieger | Sep 1964 | A |
3297077 | Garbus | Jan 1967 | A |
3324930 | Colombo | Jun 1967 | A |
3363383 | La Barge | Jan 1968 | A |
3570579 | Matsushima | Mar 1971 | A |
3880500 | Kojabashian | Apr 1975 | A |
4344475 | Frey | Aug 1982 | A |
4438605 | DeLucia | Mar 1984 | A |
4483020 | Dunn | Nov 1984 | A |
4716698 | Wilson | Jan 1988 | A |
4762020 | Schmidberger | Aug 1988 | A |
4785565 | Kuffner | Nov 1988 | A |
5007108 | Laberge et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5133108 | Esnault | Jul 1992 | A |
5148850 | Urbanick | Sep 1992 | A |
5176463 | Kraus | Jan 1993 | A |
5214623 | Seager | May 1993 | A |
5488982 | Rejc | Feb 1996 | A |
5588167 | Pahno et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613541 | Bradbury | Mar 1997 | A |
5706026 | Kent et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5771489 | Snedeker | Jun 1998 | A |
5795430 | Beeteson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5923318 | Zhai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6016176 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6160540 | Fishkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6378172 | Schrage | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441809 | Kent et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6556189 | Takahata et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557177 | Hochmuth | May 2003 | B2 |
7075527 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7443380 | Nozawa | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446757 | Mochizuki | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456823 | Poupyrev et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8194399 | Ashcraft et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8380327 | Park | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8581859 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8619021 | Hayton | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8780540 | Whitt, III et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8780541 | Whitt, III et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804324 | Bohn | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8929085 | Franklin et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8999474 | Casteras | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20010033275 | Kent et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020033798 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020167495 | Quinn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030043087 | Kim | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060269 | Paulsen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030144034 | Hack et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147205 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030210801 | Naksen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214485 | Roberts | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227441 | Hioki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008191 | Poupyrev et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017355 | Shim | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035994 | Cho et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046739 | Gettemy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040212588 | Moriyama | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239631 | Gresham | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050051693 | Chu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057527 | Takenaka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050140646 | Nozawa | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162389 | Obermeyer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050237308 | Autio et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060007151 | Ram | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060077672 | Schaak | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060199999 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238494 | Narayanaswami et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040810 | Dowe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070097014 | Solomon | May 2007 | A1 |
20070154254 | Bevirt | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205997 | Lieshout et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242033 | Cradick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247422 | Vertegaal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080018631 | Hioki et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042940 | Hasegawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080251662 | Desorbo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090058828 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085866 | Sugahara | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088204 | Culbert et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115734 | Frederiksson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090184921 | Scott et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219247 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237872 | Bemelmans et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244013 | Eldershaw | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090326833 | Ryhanen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011291 | Nurmi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013939 | Ohno et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056223 | Choi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060548 | Choi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108828 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120470 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134428 | Oh | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141605 | Kang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164888 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228295 | Whitefield | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238612 | Hsiao et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263245 | Bowser | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110007000 | Lim | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018494 | Wong et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110057873 | Geissler et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062703 | Lopez et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080155 | Aldridge | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095999 | Hayton | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110141053 | Bulea et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141069 | Hirakata et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167391 | Momeyer | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193771 | Chronqvist | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227822 | Shai | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241822 | Opran et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110298786 | Cho et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120044620 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120110784 | Hsu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162876 | Kim | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120206375 | Fyke et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130083496 | Franklin | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120912 | Ladouceur | May 2013 | A1 |
20130178344 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187864 | Paasovaara et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194207 | Andrew et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197819 | Vanska et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130286553 | Vanska et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130335929 | Cavallaro | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003006 | Ahn | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1598870 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1617614 | May 2005 | CN |
101430601 | May 2009 | CN |
1657965 | May 2006 | EP |
1770965 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1829023 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1830336 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1970886 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2166443 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2202624 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2315186 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2508960 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2456512 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2002278515 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003015795 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004046792 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004192241 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2008152426 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2006-0134130 | Dec 2006 | KR |
20090006718 | Jan 2009 | KR |
20090006807 | Jan 2009 | KR |
2009-001161 | Feb 2009 | KR |
200404248 | Mar 2004 | TW |
WO 0060438 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-2005093548 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006014230 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2008150600 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009050107 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2010041227 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2011117681 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011144972 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011117681 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2013160737 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mina; Samsung Unveils Flexible Android Smartphone; http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-unveils-flexible-android-smartphone-24933/ (8 pages). |
Smith, Matt; Nokia's kinetic future: flexible screens and a twisted interface; Oct. 26, 2012; http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/26/nokias-kinetic-future-flexible-screens-and-a-twisted-interface/ (4 pages). |
“How Users Manipulate Deformable Displays as Input Devices”, Sang-Su Lee et al Apr. 10-15, 2010, (pp. 1647-1656). |
“Gummi: A bendable computer”, Dr Ivan Poupyrev—http://ivanpoupyrev.com/projects/gummi.php, (1994-2012), (7 pages). |
“Mrata Tactile controller TV remote hands-on (video)”, Zach Honig—http://www.engadget.com2011/10/05/murata-tactile-controller-tv-remote-ands-on-vi . . . , (2012), (8 pages). |
“Press release: revolutionary new paper computer shows flexible future for smartphones and tablets”, http://www.hml.queensu.ca/paperphone, (2012), (2 pages). |
Lahey, Byron, et al., “PaperPhone: Understanding the Use of Bend Gestures in Mobile Devices with Flexible Electronic Paper Displays”, CHI 2011-Session: flexible Grips & Gestures, May 7-12, 2011, pp. 1303-1312. |
Tajika, Taichi et al.; “Intuitive Page-Turning Interface of E-Books on Flexible E-Paper Based on User Studies”; 2008; Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia MM '08; pp. 793-796. |
Melanson, Donald; “Nokia patent application points to flexible phone displays”; Jan. 19, 2010; http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/nokia-patent-application-points-to-flexible-phone-displays/. |
Watanabe, Jun-ichiro, et al., “Booksheet: Bendable Device for Browsing Content Using the Metaphor of Leafing Through the Pages”, Sep. 21-24, 2008, pp. 360-369. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130187864 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |