The present disclosure relates to commercial aircraft multi-class cabin arrangements and how they can be efficiently separated from each other. One method to achieve division of the seat groups is by providing a hard divider between rows of seats attached to the aircraft seat tracks and an upper support element such as an overhead storage bin assembly or passenger service unit (PSU) rail.
Head Injury Criteria (HIC) requirements are provided, for example, by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to establish standards in passenger protection in passenger aircraft cabin design. Certain HIC requirements are set forth in 14 CFR 23.562, which is incorporated herein by reference. The HIC requirements, for example, result in clearance requirements within a head impact zone to reduce likelihood of passenger concussion in the event of an emergency such as rapid deceleration. Further, the requirements specify a measurable HIC number resulting from, for example, a head impact against objects that are within the head impact zone of a passenger, such as a fore passenger seat or a partition. In this manner, should a passenger's head impact an object such as the forward backrest of the fore passenger seat, the force of the impact is absorbed at least in part through the backrest design.
Federal regulations also dictate certain standards for static load handling and dynamic load handling. 14 CFR 25.562 (incorporated herein by reference) provides that seats and restraint systems must be able to withstand a 16G dynamic load. 14 CFR 25.561 (incorporated herein by reference) provides that other aircraft structures such as bulkheads must be able to withstand a 9G forward static load. It is understood in the industry that if structures are spaced within one inch of one another, it must be demonstrated that the structures are capable of sharing loads during normal use and emergency landing conditions. Due to the complexity of the analysis, those skilled in the art of aircraft interior components generally avoid placing components within one inch of one another. For this reason, a minimum spacing of one inch has generally been maintained between bulkheads and seating systems (e.g. between a bulkhead and the aft surface of an aircraft seat).
In one aspect, to optimize the usable space between cabin classes, a contoured class divider according to this application is specifically designed to nest into the volume behind the seat body following the profile of the seatback while still allowing for adequate seatback recline. In some embodiments, the form of the divider allows the seat immediately behind the contoured class divider to be located several inches closer to the seat forward of it, thus increasing the opportunity for increased seat pitch and passenger legroom in the cabin.
In one aspect, to increase passenger safety in the event of a rapid deceleration (e.g., as would occur during an emergency landing) a locking mechanism is design to release to allow the partition to move forwardly, increasing the clearance between the passenger and the divider. The locking mechanism, in one example, may include a shear pin which remains in its locked position until it is subjected to longitudinal acceleration associated with an emergency landing. Under those conditions the deceleration force experienced by the divider is sufficient to overcome the pin static shear force and the divider moves forwardly.
In another aspect, to increase passenger safety in the event of rapid deceleration, a contoured class divider according to this application includes at least one energy absorbing zone to absorb the energy of a head impact in the event of an emergency situation. In one example, an energy absorbing zone includes one or more structurally weakened portions designed to deform or break as a result of a threshold dynamic load. In other examples, the energy absorbing zone includes one or more portions embedded with energy absorbing material. The energy absorbing material may be foam. In further examples, the energy absorbing zone is designed to deform in a predetermined manner.
In a further aspect, the placement of a class divider panel within less than one inch of a seat or restraint system is facilitated by providing a known impact or interaction points between the divider and seat back. Impact protrusions or other design elements described herein may provide known points at which the divider will impact the seat, which will in turn simplify and make practical the calculations necessary to show that the divider and seat are able to withstand the projected load sharing in an emergency landing.
These and other objects and advantages of the embodiments described herein may be achieved, in some implementations, by providing a contoured class divider that includes a curved panel. The curved panel may be mounted into seat tracks T behind a selected row of seats. The curve of the panel may closely correspond to the shape of the back of the selected row of seats and may nest into the volume behind the seatback while still allowing for adequate seatback recline. More specifically, a contoured class divider may be provided for dividing an aircraft cabin according to a predetermined class arrangement and including a divider panel having a contour closely matching a contour of a forward-positioned seatback and adapted for being positioned in closely, spaced-apart relation to the seatback for providing additional space aft of the seat. At least one leg may be provided for supporting the panel about an aircraft cabin deck. A viewing window may be formed in the panel for providing the ability of a flight attendant to observe areas of the cabin forward or aft of the divider.
In one non-limiting illustrative example, a contoured class divider for dividing an aircraft cabin may include a panel positioned between a aft seat and a forward seat, the panel having an aft-facing convex contour closely matching an aft-facing contour of a seatback of the forward seat and configured to provide a gain of space forward of the aft seat; and at least one foot inserted into a seat track of the aircraft cabin; an articulation system to articulate the panel from a rearward position to a forward position and to increase the space between the divider and the seats immediately aft thereof (or, alternatively, permit those seats to be moved forward and, in some configurations, thereby enable an additional row of seats to be disposed on the airplane); and at least one connector that connects a top end of the panel and an overhead structural element of the aircraft cabin.
In one non-limiting illustrative example, a contoured class divider for dividing an aircraft cabin includes a panel positioned between a aft seat and a forward seat, the panel having an aft-facing convex contour closely matching an aft-facing contour of a seatback of the forward seat seatback and configured to provide increased space between the divider and the seats immediately aft thereof (or, alternatively, permit those seats to be moved forward and, in some configurations, thereby enable an additional row of seats to be disposed on the airplane), and a head impact zone configured to limit an impact shock between a passenger head and the panel; and at least one foot inserted into a seat track of the aircraft cabin; an articulation system to articulate the panel from a rearward position to a forward position and to increase the gain of space forward of the aft seat; and at least one connector that connects a top end of the panel and an overhead structural element of the aircraft cabin.
In one non-limiting illustrative example, an apparatus to divide class sections within a commercial aircraft is presented. The apparatus may include a divider panel positioned between an aft seat and a forward seat, the panel having an aft-facing convex contour closely matching an aft-facing contour of a seatback of the forward seat seatback and configured to provide increased space between the divider and the seats immediately aft thereof (or, alternatively, permit those seats to be moved forward and, in some configurations, thereby enable an additional row of seats to be disposed on the airplane). The apparatus may include at least one impact protrusion configured to be the initial point of impact if the forward seat makes contact with the panel. The panel may include at least one foot inserted into a seat track of the aircraft cabin. The apparatus may include an articulation system to articulate the panel from a rearward position to a forward position and vice-versa, allowing the gain of space forward of the aft seat; and at least one connector that connects a top end of the panel and an overhead structural element of the aircraft cabin.
A more complete appreciation of the innovations and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, where:
Referring now specifically to
Referring to
Returning to
The legs 16, 18, in some embodiments, are bowed rearwardly in a convex manner. This may provide additional clearance between the legs 16, 18 of the divider 10 and the rear legs of the seat. Such a configuration allows the bottom of the divider 10 to offset further forward and nest closer into the back of the seat S in front, thus, increasing the living space for the passengers immediately aft of the divider. It may also provide enhanced resistance to deflection of the divider 10 in the aft direction, as might occur if the divider is impacted by excessive recline of the seatback of the seat S or 202 or if forced rearwardly by a passenger. In alternative configurations, the legs 16, 18 are bowed forwardly in a concave manner (not shown). This configuration has the advantages that the legs 16, 18 generally follow the contour of the rear legs of the seats 202, provide more ingress and egress foot clearance for passengers in the three main cabin seats, and enhanced resistance to forward deflection of the divider.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the legs 16, 18 are coupled to the divider by force distributing flanges 24 and 26. These flanges disperse the load transferred between the legs and panel 12 such that the panel can be of a relatively lightweight construction with either modest or no structural reinforcement in the region of the leg 16 and 18.
Returning to
In another example, the contoured class divider 200 may be positioned in the forward (solid line) position during take-off and landing, and in the rearward (dashed line) position in-flight. For example, as illustrated in dashed lines, the passenger seat 202′ may only have clearance to move to a rearward position (illustrated in dashed lines) when the contoured class divider is positioned in the rear (dashed line) position. In this situation, the positioning of the contoured class divider 200 may be actuated by a passenger or crew member. In one example, a passenger may cause the contoured class divider 200 to actuate to a rearward position by selecting a control such as the conventional passenger seat back recline control. In another example, a crew member may have access to a control positioned proximate the overhead bin (e.g. on the underside of the bin adjacent the slot into which a connector extends, or inside the bin).
Referring now to
The panel 32, in the illustrative embodiment, is generally concave in the rear-facing direction with a lower section 32a that is relatively flat. The lower section 32a, for example, may be designed to accommodate pockets 40 for use by occupants of aft-positioned seats. The profile of the top end of the panel 32, in the illustrative embodiment, is curved to fit a fuselage and storage bin configuration different than that shown in
The center divider 50, in some embodiments, includes a panel 52. The center divider 50, in some examples, may be attached to floor-mounted seat tracks via legs 56, 58, 60, and 62 and to the overhead stowage bin of the aircraft cabin by connectors 64, 66 in the manner discussed above. The center divider 50 may include, for example, an attendant viewing window 54 that is inset into an outer corner of the upper part of the panel 52 that may have the properties discussed above. Legs 56, 58, 62, and 62 may be bowed rearwardly as shown and as described above. The panel 52 in the rear-facing direction, in the illustrative embodiment, is generally concave with a lower section 52a that is relatively flat. The lower section 52a, for example, may be designed to accommodate pockets 68 for use by occupants main cabin seats positioned immediately aft of the divider 50. The profile of the top end of the panel 52, in the illustrative embodiment, is curved to fit storage bins mounted on the center aisle above the center passengers. The center divider 50 may be secured against deflection by connectors 64, 66 that attach the center divider 50 to an overhead structure, not shown. The connectors preferably permit the divider to move between a rear position and forward position, as discussed above.
A starboard side divider 70, in some implementations, may be attached to floor-mounted seat tracks via legs 76, 78 and to the overhead stowage bin of the aircraft cabin via connector 82 in a manner similar to that described above. The starboard divider 70 may include an attendant viewing window 74 that is inset into a corner of the upper part of the panel 72 that may have the properties and functionality discussed above. The panel 72 in the rear-facing direction, in the illustrative embodiment, is generally concave with a lower section 72a that is relatively flat. The lower section 72a, for example, may be designed to accommodate pockets 80 for use by occupants of passengers in the seats immediately aft of the divider 70. The profile of the top end of the panel 72, in the illustrative embodiment, is curved to fit a storage bin configuration different than that shown in
As shown in
The articulation of the contoured class divider 700 from the rearward position (solid lines) to the forward position (dashed lines), in some implementations, is configured to increase seating capacity and space for other cabin amenities while conforming to HIC requirements. The contour and/or articulation of the contoured class divider 700 may enable the main cabin seats positions immediately aft the contoured class divider 700 to be moved forward up to an amount roughly equal to or slightly greater than the amount of recline available on the forward seat 704 inches (towards the contoured class divider 700) due to the increased clearance provided by the contour and/or articulation of the class divider 700. This may in many cabin configurations enable the insertion of an additional row of main cabin and/or premium cabin seats. Alternatively or additionally, the space savings provided by the class divider may alternatively be utilized to improve passenger comfort, as by enlarging the living space of for the passengers seated immediately aft of the divider or enlarging the living space in a number of rows (e.g., by increasing the seat pitch in the premium cabin, the forward portion of the main cabin, or the rear portion of the main cabin) without reducing the number of seats on the aircraft. Seat pitch is the distance between like points on seats juxtaposed fore and aft of one another.
In other embodiments, the divider 700 provides 1-12 inches of additional clearance, 2-10 inches of additional clearance, 3-9 inches of additional clearance, 4-8 inches of additional clearance, 5-7 inches of additional clearance or about six inches of additional clearance. As discussed herein below, up to an additional inch of clearance may be provided by positioning the seat and divider in close proximity (less than one inch apart) such that they share loads during normal operation and/or emergency landings.
The articulation system 702, in some implementations, includes at least one pivot mechanism 702a to enable articulation of the contoured class divider 700 from the rearward position (solid lines) to the forward position (dashed lines), and vice-versa, via a rotation or pivoting of at least the panel 706 of the contoured class divider 700 between the rearward and forward positions. The at least one pivot mechanism 702a can be placed at a predetermined position on the contoured class divider 700, in one example, to maximize the additional clearance generated by the articulation of the contoured class divider 700 from the rearward position (solid lines) to the forward position (dashed lines). As illustrated, for example, the at least one pivot mechanism 702a (such as a rotatable pin connection) can be placed on the leg(s) 708 at top part of the foot 710. The at least one pivot mechanism 702a for example, may be configured to rotate the panel 700 around a rotation axis substantially parallel to a floor of the aircraft cabin, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the articulation system 702 further includes a locking mechanism 702b for locking the contoured class divider 700 in either the rearward position (solid lines) or the forward position (dashed lines). The locking mechanisms are discussed in greater detail below in relation to
As mentioned above, the divider may be positioned in the rearward position at all times until an emergency landing occurs. The declarative force of the emergency landing moves the divider to the forward position without interfering with the seat because the seat will be in the TTOL position during an emergency landing. This configuration advantageously provides full recline for the seat forward of the divider (in the first, business or premium cabin) while provide the aforementioned amounts of additional clearance.
In an alternative embodiment, the divider is routinely articulated between the forward and rearward positions by crew members. For instance, after reaching cruising altitude the crew may move the divider to the rearward position. In preparation for TTOL, the crew may move the divider to a forward position.
In some implementations, a contoured class divider 720, as illustrated in
The at least one pivot mechanism 726a for example, may be configured to rotate the upper curved region 722a around a rotation axis substantially parallel to a floor of the aircraft cabin, as illustrated in
This configuration provides the advantage that the pivoting or rotating mass is reduced. This may permit the use of a higher strength (and heavier) panel construction or a lighter weight or lower strength connector mechanism. The mid-range positioning of the pivot mechanism 726a, for example, may be configured to lessen a load on the pivot mechanism 726a as opposed to the embodiment illustrated in
All of the functionality and features described above apply equally to the embodiment shown in
The locking system 800, in some embodiments, includes a body 810 affixed to an overhead stowage bin (such as bin B illustrated in
In other implementations (not shown) the body permits the pin to move axially from the first end 816a and to the second end 816b via manual actuation by a cabin attendant. For example, to prepare for TTOL, the cabin attendant may retract a spring-loaded pin downwards out of an aperture in the housing, articulate the contoured class divider from a rearward position to an upright position, and shift the pin upwards to lock it within a corresponding aperture of the housing. In other embodiments, a manual latch mechanism may releasably retain the pin in the two desired positions. The manual latch may be actuated by a handle disposed on the underside of the overhead bins. The latch and handle may be connected via a cable.
Returning to the embodiment depicted in
When the deceleration generated by the emergency is lower than the emergency deceleration threshold, the deceleration generates a force on the articulating contoured class divider panel that is too weak to overcome the predetermined force, and the pin 814 cannot slide along the channel 812. The pin 814 stays at proximity of the first end 816a and the contoured class divider panel is maintained in the rearward position.
In other embodiments (not shown), a spring-loaded latch is used to retain the pin in a the rearward position until the spring latching force is overcome by the predetermined force, at which time the pin moves forward and its received and retained by another latch. In another variation the pin is permanently biased in the rearward direction. During deceleration the pin moves forward and when it reaches the front of the channel it is retained and locked into place with a latch. In still other embodiments, a spring may forwardly bias the pin which is held in the rearward position by a latch. A solenoid may release the pin when an accelerometer detects a predetermined amount of deceleration. At that time the spring moves the pin forward in the channel and another latch receives and retains the pin at the forward end of the channel. In still further embodiments, electro-magnets may be used to hold the pin in place and/or repel a magnetic pin in the desired direction when an accelerometer detects a predetermined amount of deceleration.
In some implementations, an articulating contoured class divider locking system is designed to provide a fixed position panel except in the event of an emergency. The fixed position panel may be configured to withstand a static load meeting or exceeding a dynamic load threshold. Upon exceeding the dynamic load threshold (e.g., indicative of an emergency deceleration condition or other abrupt force), the locking system may release to provide additional clearance for passengers and to avoid passenger injury. In an illustrative example, the locking system may be designed to support static loads of 9 G while remaining in locked position. In the event of a dynamic load of about 16 G or greater, however, the primary locking mechanism of the locking system will release, and the panel will move into a secondary locking position, thus dissipating the inertial load by allowing the panel to shift forward in a controlled manner. For example, in some embodiments, the locking system can automatically articulate the contoured class divider from the inclined position to the forward position when a deceleration generated by an emergency, e.g. a series of turbulences, a forced landing, a sudden braking, or other accident.
A contoured class divider, in some implementations, may vary substantially in weight depending upon a deployment configuration. For example, the contoured class divider may be configured to hold one or more video monitors, pockets filled with reading materials or other passenger convenient items, and/or passenger storage area. In a particular example, a baby bassinet or other child seating configuration may be suspended from the contoured class divider. In these circumstances, it may be desirable to move the pivot point up to the middle of the panel as shown in
Turning now to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Alternatively, the head impact zone 904, in some implementations, can be configured to avoid contact between the passenger and the contoured panel. For example, the head impact zone 904 can include individual recesses (not illustrated) sufficiently curved forwardly to avoid contact between the head of the passenger and the contoured class divider panel. The embossments, in some implementations, may be covered with a material such as a stretched tissue to mask the embossments.
A skilled artisan will understand that in certain cabin configurations the passengers seated immediately aft of the divider will be positioned sufficiently far away from the divider such that their heads will not impact the divider during an emergency landing. In such configurations the energy absorbing zones can be omitted or rather included to provide an additional measure of safety.
Turning to
This embodiment provides the advantage that the divider may be moved entirely out of the range of the passengers' heads. Alternatively, this approach may be used in combination with an energy absorbing zone to minimize the extent and force of the impact with the passengers' heads. To further protect the passengers seated behind the contoured class divider 940, in some embodiments, the flexible reversibly-jointed ribs 944 may be designed to lock into and maintain the concave position upon impact. For example, by preventing return to the convex orientation, the passenger's heads may be spared a bounce-back impact by the ribs 944.
In some implementations, rather than depending upon a dynamic load impact to reverse the orientation of the reversibly-jointed ribs 944, the ribs may include a dynamic load trigger. In one example, a load sensor built into the locking mechanism at the top of the contoured divider panel may both release the contoured divider panel from its rearward position and trigger reversal of the reversibly-jointed ribs 944. In a particular example, a hinge 946 of each rib 944 may surround an inflatable material such as an inflatable tube. By forcing air into the inflatable tubes, for example, the hinge mechanism holding the ribs in the present orientation may be broken, causing the ribs to reverse orientation and thereby assume the concave orientation.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, a number, depth, surface area, shape, material composition, and/or positioning of each impact protrusion 1004, 1016, 1022 may be selected to simplify impact simulations and/or to limit damage caused by the impact between the contoured class divider 1000, 1010, 1020 and the passenger seats 1002, 1014. For example, by disposing the impact protrusion(s) 1004, 1022 upon the contoured class divider 1000, 1020 (or, alternatively, protrusions 1016 on the passenger seats 1014), a known point of impact is created between the passenger seats 1002 (1014) and the contoured class divider 1000, 1020, (1010) thus simplifying calculations for load sharing in emergency circumstances.
In some implementations, each impact protrusion 1004, 1022 is disposed in a panel reinforced area of the fore surface of the contoured class divider panel 1006, 1024 configured to withstand the impact shock between the contoured class divider 1000, 1020 and the passenger seats 1002. The panel reinforced area can be made of a material having a strength higher than a material composing the panel 1000, 1020, e.g. high-density polyethylene, Delrin, steel alloy, acrylic, a thickness greater than a thickness of the panel 12, and/or a density greater than a density of the panel 12. Similarly, each impact protrusion 1016 may be disposed in a passenger seat reinforced area of the aft surface of the passenger seats 1014 of
Each impact protrusion 1004, 1016, 1022, in some implementations, is coated with an energy absorbing layer to provide a damping between the contoured class divider panel 1006, 1024, 1012, and the passenger seats 1002, 1014. For example, the energy absorbing layer may limit scratching and other damage to the contoured class divider panel 1006, 1024, 1012 and/or the passenger seats 1002, 1014. The energy absorbing layer may be made from elastic materials such as elastomer alloys, rubber alloys, or the like.
One advantage of deploying the protrusions on the divider is that the seats need not be customized. The seats positioned directly in front of the divider may have the same configuration and construction as the remainder or majority of the seats in that cabin.
Various details related to embodiments of contoured class dividers maybe changed without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Furthermore, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the contoured class divider and best mode for practicing the use of contoured class dividers as described herein are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/153,104 entitled “Contoured Class Divider” and filed May 12, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/317,706 filed Apr. 4, 2016, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The present disclosure is also related to PCT application number PCT/US16/32061 entitled “Contoured Class Divider” and filed May 12, 2016, the contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2268927 | Demme | Jan 1942 | A |
3423121 | Lipkin | Jan 1969 | A |
3703310 | Lystad | Nov 1972 | A |
4597549 | Ryan | Jul 1986 | A |
4861103 | Vallee | Aug 1989 | A |
4899962 | Mueller | Feb 1990 | A |
5133587 | Hadden, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5165626 | Ringger | Nov 1992 | A |
5306066 | Saathoff | Apr 1994 | A |
5320308 | Bilezikjian | Jun 1994 | A |
5338090 | Simpson | Aug 1994 | A |
5340059 | Kanigowski | Aug 1994 | A |
5344210 | Marwan | Sep 1994 | A |
5350144 | Lary | Sep 1994 | A |
5393013 | Schneider | Feb 1995 | A |
5445861 | Newton et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5482230 | Bird | Jan 1996 | A |
5531499 | Vecchio et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5573304 | Glockl | Nov 1996 | A |
5577358 | Franke | Nov 1996 | A |
5649721 | Stafford | Jul 1997 | A |
5716026 | Pascasio | Feb 1998 | A |
5788185 | Hooper | Aug 1998 | A |
5816534 | Schumacher | Oct 1998 | A |
5836547 | Koch | Nov 1998 | A |
5839757 | Von Lange | Nov 1998 | A |
5876064 | Ament | Mar 1999 | A |
6158771 | Nusser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6234526 | Song et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245408 | Bitzer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264238 | MacDonald | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6340171 | Hirth et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6523779 | Michel | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6588705 | Frank | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6672662 | Balk | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692069 | Beroth | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698819 | Mozer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6758507 | Tarahomi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780488 | Holemans | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808206 | Yata et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7083146 | Hiesener | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7213882 | Dryburgh | May 2007 | B2 |
7287796 | Coles et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7905451 | Schotte | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975963 | Merz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8091939 | Forsyth | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8590838 | Cook | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8960602 | Neumann | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9199740 | Ehlers | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9327836 | Weitzel | May 2016 | B2 |
9352839 | Gehret | May 2016 | B2 |
9428132 | Obadia et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9511867 | Schliwa | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9650146 | Boenning | May 2017 | B2 |
9718552 | Zheng | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9868528 | Mayer | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10011058 | Sutton | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10059423 | Smithson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10106187 | Farrar | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10358173 | Gussen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20030094837 | Williamson | May 2003 | A1 |
20060006704 | Skelly | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070138780 | Beki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070222266 | Lucci | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090200422 | Johnson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090242149 | Breuer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100078985 | Mahoney | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100255919 | Kelly | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110062283 | Breuer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120292967 | Cailleteau | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130248651 | Burrows | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140014774 | Pozzi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140124623 | Chandler | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124624 | Jacobsen | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138986 | Tsuneyama | May 2014 | A1 |
20140158826 | Young | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175219 | Young | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140375090 | Wegenka | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150035340 | Lussan | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150284084 | Mayer | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150284085 | McKee | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287564 | Benke et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160198864 | Yang | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160296419 | Paulussen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160297525 | Walton | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160304204 | McKee | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170021929 | McKee | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170021933 | Pozzi | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170129608 | Reams | May 2017 | A1 |
20170267350 | Heidtmann | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170267353 | McIntosh | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170283060 | Papke et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170283061 | Papke et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170283065 | Papke et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180022457 | Papke et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180222589 | Papke et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10322611 | Aug 2004 | DE |
10 2005 009 750 | Sep 2006 | DE |
0 361 717 | Apr 1990 | EP |
1 698 552 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2 113 427 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2 727 836 | May 2014 | EP |
3 219 555 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3 219 601 | Sep 2017 | EP |
2877281 | May 2006 | FR |
WO-9301088 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-2018071596 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion on International Application PCT/US2018/053617 dated Dec. 10, 2018. 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/032061 dated Dec. 7, 2016. 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/056222 dated Feb. 26, 2018. 12 pages. |
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/153,104 dated Sep. 20, 2018. 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/025891 dated Jun. 1, 2018. 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170283061 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62317706 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15153104 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15291863 | US |