The present technology is directed generally to contoured fan blades and associated systems and methods. More particularly, the present technology discloses curved (e.g., along a sine wave) fan blades used in dehumidifiers, air movers, fans, and other devices/systems with similar functions.
The shape of a fan blade affects its aerodynamic characteristics. Existing rotating blades with a flat surface design may generate turbulence, which may lower the blade's air-moving efficiency. In some cases, rotating such existing blades may cause uneven or non-uniform airflow (e.g., as shown in
The present technology is directed generally to fan blades and corresponding systems, devices, and methods for manufacturing the same. Fan blades configured in accordance with embodiments of the disclosed technology can be used to effectively generate airflow and/or move air in a predetermined direction.
In general terms, the fan blades disclosed herein are configured to move a fluid (in some embodiments, air or another gas, a liquid, and/or a combination thereof) in an efficient way by mitigating or decreasing undesirable vortices, turbulence, and/or eddies. The present technology can effectively reduce noise and/or vibrations caused by these undesirable vortices and accordingly improve the overall efficiency of the blade.
Several details describing structures/apparatus/systems that are well-known and often associated with these types of structures/apparatuses/systems, but that may unnecessarily obscure some significant aspects of the presently disclosed technology, are not set forth in the following description for purposes of clarity. Furthermore, although the following disclosure sets forth several representative embodiments of different aspects of the disclosed technology, several other embodiments can have different configurations and/or different components than those described in this section. Accordingly, the disclosed technology may include other embodiments with additional elements not described below with reference to
As shown, the fan blade 101 includes multiple upper channels 207a and lower channels 207b. The upper channels 207a and the lower channels 207b extend from the first curved edge 201a to the second curved edge 201a along the width W of the fan blade 101. The upper channels 207a and the lower channels 207b are configured to direct airflow passing along the upper and the lower surfaces, respectively, of the fan blade 101. Embodiments of the upper and lower channels 207a, 207b are described in greater detail later with reference to
As shown in
In some embodiments, the sizes of the first, second, and third sections 301, 303, and 305 can be adjusted based on various factors such as an expected rotation speed of the hub 103, the shape of the fan blade 101 (e.g., whether the edges are formed from single or multiple sine waves, the amplitude of the sine wave, etc.).
Tables 1-6 below show comparisons of test results between a conventional blade and an improved fan blade (e.g., generally similar to the fan blade 101 shown in
Efficiencies shown in the following tables are mechanical efficiencies (MEs), which can be calculated based on respective power inputs and power outputs. In some embodiments, the MEs can be calculated based on volumes of airflow, airflow pressure, and consumed power. For example, the mechanical efficiency can be calculated by Equation A below.
ME=(CFM×TP)/(6356×BHP) (A)
In Equation (A) above, “CFM” represents the flow rate of an airflow (“cubic feet per minute”), “TP” represents total pressure of the airflow (the sum of static pressure “SP” and velocity pressure “VP”), “BHP” represents brake horsepower (e.g., the fan's power consumption), and “6356” is a constant. Via Equation (A), the ME of a fan can be calculated by measuring its flow rate, total pressure, and brake horsepower.
In Tables 1, 2, 3, and 6, the conventional fan had straight blades with winglets. In Tables 4 and 5, the conventional fan had straight blades with no winglets. The motor coupled to the conventional fan and the improved fan was either a 140-Watt motor (Tables 1, 2, 4, and 5) or a 200-Watt motor (Tables 3 and 6).
In Table 1, a first test result of a fan in a “pusher” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than conventional blades while consuming less current. As a result, the fan with the improved blades has a higher efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
In Table 2, a second test result of a fan in a “puller” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than the conventional blades, and draw less current. As a result, the fan with the improved blades has a higher efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
In Table 3, a third test result of a fan in a “puller” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than the conventional blades, and draw less current. As a result, the fan with the improved blades has a higher efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
In Table 4, a fourth test result of a fan in a “pusher” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than the conventional blades, with a slightly higher current draw. The fan with the improved blades produced a higher overall efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
In Table 5, a fifth test result of a fan in a “puller” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than the conventional blades, while drawing generally the same current. Therefore, the fan with the improved blades has a higher efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
In Table 6, a sixth test result of a fan in a “puller” configuration shows that fan blades in accordance with the present disclosure can generate a higher flow volume than the conventional blades, while drawing less current. Therefore, the fan with the improved blades has a higher efficiency than one having the conventional blades.
According to the test results shown in Tables 1-6, a fan with the improved blades of the present disclosure generally provides higher airflow while drawing less current.
Referring to both
In some embodiments, however, the curved edges 201a, 201b can have different dimensions (e.g., via different combinations of sine waves). In such embodiments, the dimensions of the upper and/or lower channels 207a, 207b can be different. For example, one of the upper channels 207a can have a broader opening at the first curved edge 201a and have a narrower opening at the second curved edge 201b, or vice versa. In some embodiments, two adjacent upper channels 207a can have different dimensions. In some embodiments, two adjacent lower channels 207b can have different dimensions.
In some embodiments, the fan blade 101 can be designed based on a combination of multiple waves. For example,
The present fan blade 101 with a “wavy” design can effectively direct airflow in a more streamwise manner. It is believed that curved leading and trailing edges, with corresponding upper and lower channels can effectively reduce turbulence along at least the curved length of the fan blade 101, if not an even greater portion of the overall length of the blade. As a result, the blade is expected to perform more efficiently.
In some embodiments, forming the multiple fan blades includes forming each of the fan blades with multiple upper channels and multiple lower channels. In some embodiments, the multiple upper channels (and/or the lower channel) can extend from the first curved edge to the second curved edge. In some embodiments, the fan blades can have other suitable shapes and configurations.
One advantage of embodiments of the present technology is that the fan blade can be customized to fit the needs of various types of air-moving (and/or air-driven) devices. Another advantage of embodiments of the present technology is that fan blade systems can include modular components (e.g., fan blades with different curved or sine-waved shapes) that are easy to install and/or maintain. An overarching result of any one or combination of the foregoing features is that the fan blades of the present technology can be more efficient, less noisy, and/or more flexible than conventional blades.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the technology. For example, in some embodiments, the fan blade can be formed based on repetitive or periodic waves other than sine waves.
Certain aspects of the technology described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Further, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the present technology. Accordingly, the present disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein. The following example provides an additional embodiment of the disclosed technology.
To the extent any materials incorporated herein by reference conflict with the present disclosure, the present disclosure controls.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/752,173, filed on Oct. 29, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
108949 | Wheeler | Nov 1870 | A |
D184468 | Wistrand | Feb 1959 | S |
2899128 | Vaghi | Aug 1959 | A |
3319786 | Rudolf | May 1967 | A |
3333345 | Miller | Aug 1967 | A |
3510958 | Van Der Lely | May 1970 | A |
D243243 | Nagao et al. | Feb 1977 | S |
D254566 | Cummins | Mar 1980 | S |
4572188 | Augustine et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4830315 | Presz, Jr. | May 1989 | A |
5030068 | Jacobs et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5155924 | Smith | Oct 1992 | A |
5174048 | Shero | Dec 1992 | A |
5208940 | London et al. | May 1993 | A |
D340326 | Genovese | Oct 1993 | S |
5257467 | White | Nov 1993 | A |
5265895 | Barrett | Nov 1993 | A |
5403152 | Trautloff et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405370 | Irani | Apr 1995 | A |
5893216 | Smith et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
D409737 | Nilsson | May 1999 | S |
5950331 | Coggins et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954494 | Goldsmith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991973 | Simpson | Nov 1999 | A |
6024543 | Lambertson | Feb 2000 | A |
D422351 | Griffin | Apr 2000 | S |
6195907 | Bodnar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202322 | Turner, IV | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D440298 | Wolfe | Apr 2001 | S |
D442740 | Wolfe | May 2001 | S |
6367625 | Zobel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401354 | Johnson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
D468726 | Shimokawatoko et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
D480467 | White | Oct 2003 | S |
D484586 | Intravatola | Dec 2003 | S |
D488857 | Wintersteen et al. | Apr 2004 | S |
6739070 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
D497664 | Puri | Oct 2004 | S |
D503971 | Otaki | Apr 2005 | S |
6899516 | Wang | May 2005 | B2 |
6908287 | Cho | Jun 2005 | B2 |
D517677 | Bartholmey | Mar 2006 | S |
7007403 | Studebaker | Mar 2006 | B1 |
D526751 | Hendy | Aug 2006 | S |
7090710 | Choi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D533322 | Blateri | Dec 2006 | S |
D536432 | Jackovitch et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
D537153 | Hoog et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
D537156 | Marengo et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
D537517 | Hancock | Feb 2007 | S |
7173353 | Lopatinsky et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D565162 | Carlson | Mar 2008 | S |
D576266 | Yamakami | Sep 2008 | S |
7460370 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D607622 | Blateri | Jan 2010 | S |
7699587 | Chapman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
D619698 | Emenheiser et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
7785064 | Bartholmey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D625799 | Salisbury et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
7861708 | Lyons | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8186974 | Lan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8296968 | Hensley | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342800 | Cvjeticanin | Jan 2013 | B2 |
D691336 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D698433 | Tomasiak et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
D704908 | Cui | May 2014 | S |
D714922 | Speh | Oct 2014 | S |
9121638 | Black et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20040047743 | Dooley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040231181 | Coven | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255484 | Storrer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050084400 | Tsai | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060049615 | Day | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056965 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060186225 | Bartholmey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070051007 | Reets et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157485 | Andrisin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183940 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080232958 | Weyandt | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090304492 | Bartholmey et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040456 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120233804 | Studebaker et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130247409 | Black et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140325865 | Wisherd et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20190024674 | Loercher | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1558297 | Dec 1979 | GB |
2227943 | Aug 1990 | GB |
2397366 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2416676 | Feb 2006 | GB |
2422192 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2423810 | Sep 2006 | GB |
2004261788 | Sep 2004 | JP |
1709951 | Feb 1992 | SU |
WO-8900622 | Jan 1989 | WO |
WO-2008137188 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dri-Eaz F504 Velo Low Profile Air Mover AKA Velos, Mar. 12, 2013, 3 pages. |
Dri-Eaz, Product Catalog, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 4-7 and 14, Burlington, Washington, U.S. |
Dri-Eaz, Product Catalog, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 9-12; Burlington, Washington, U.S. |
Dri-Eaz, Product Catalog, Jan. 1, 2003, p. 10, Burlington, Washington, U.S. |
Jon-Don; Gale Force Air Mover from Dry-Air at Jon-Don; www.jondon.com/galeforce/; Mar. 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200173458 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62752173 | Oct 2018 | US |