The present invention relates generally to endwall flowpath surface contours for gas turbine engines, and more particularly to non-axisymmetric endwall flowpath surface contours.
Gas turbine engines are well-known, and generally include various rotating and non-rotating airfoils arranged in cascades. These airfoils include fluid working surfaces that can interact with working fluids along an engine flowpath during engine operation. Endwalls are structures that bound portions of the engine flowpath, typically at radially inner and outer locations along the flowpath. These endwalls can adjoin the airfoils. In some instances, endwalls are defined by platforms or shrouds integral to the airfoil. In other instances, endwalls are defined by structures separate from the airfoils, such as ducts, shrouds, spacers and the like.
In the past, endwalls in gas turbine engines generally had axisymmetric contours, meaning the endwall was symmetric in rotation about a central axis (i.e, cylindrical, frustoconical or toroidal). Such axisymmetric endwall contours do not always provide optimal adiabatic efficiency and flow capacity, particularly due to secondary flow effects where some of the working fluid inefficiently moves in a spanwise (i.e., generally radial) direction along the working surfaces of the airfoils (with or without swirl or vortex effects).
A spacer assembly for a rotor assembly of a gas turbine engine includes an endwall segment having a non-axisymmetric flowpath surface, a first depression and a second depression. A perimeter of the flowpath surface includes a forward edge, an aft edge, a suction side edge and a pressure side edge. The first depression is formed along the flowpath surface adjoining the suction side edge, and the second depression is formed along the flowpath surface adjoining the pressure side edge.
While the above-identified figures set forth embodiments of the present disclosure, other embodiments are also contemplated, as noted in the discussion. In all cases, this disclosure presents the invention by way of representation and not limitation. It should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art, which fall within the scope and spirit of the principles of the invention. The figures may not be drawn to scale, and applications and embodiments of the present invention may include features and components not specifically shown in the drawings.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/684,490, entitled “Contoured Flowpath Blade Platform,” filed Aug. 17, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
A rotor (e.g., fan) assembly can have an endwall with a non-axisymmetric flowpath surface contour with one or more depressions along the pressure and/or suction side edges adjoining adjacent airfoils. These one or more depressions can produce localized radial “elevation” changes in the flowpath surface, which can depart in a negative radial direction from a nominal axisymmetric shape of surrounding portions of the flowpath surface contour in some embodiments. Furthermore, the flowpath surface contour can in addition or in the alternative include one or more protrusions, which can depart in a positive radial direction from the nominal axisymmetric shape of surrounding portions of the flowpath surface contour in some embodiments. Such a rotor assembly can be used in a gas turbine engine. In various embodiments, such a non-axisymmetric flowpath surface contour can be implemented on spacers that are secured to a rotor disk (e.g., fan hub) separate and independent from airfoils carried by the rotor disk. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize various features and benefits of the present invention in view of the description that follows.
Although the disclosed non-limiting embodiment depicts a turbofan gas turbine engine, it should be understood that the concepts described herein are not limited to use with turbofans as the teachings may be applied to other types of turbine engines; for example, an industrial gas turbine; a reverse-flow gas turbine engine; and a turbine engine including a three-spool architecture in which three spools concentrically rotate about a common axis and where a low spool enables a low pressure turbine to drive a fan via a gearbox, an intermediate spool that enables an intermediate pressure turbine to drive a first compressor of the compressor section, and a high spool that enables a high pressure turbine to drive a high pressure compressor of the compressor section.
The example engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis A relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided.
The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that connects a fan 42 and a low pressure (or first) compressor section 44 to a low pressure (or first) turbine section 46. The inner shaft 40 drives the fan 42 through a speed change device, such as a geared architecture 48, to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high-speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a high pressure (or second) compressor section 52 and a high pressure (or second) turbine section 54. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via the bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis A.
A combustor 56 is arranged between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. In one example, the high pressure turbine 54 includes at least two stages to provide a double stage high pressure turbine 54. In another example, the high pressure turbine 54 includes only a single stage. As used herein, a “high pressure” compressor or turbine experiences a higher pressure than a corresponding “low pressure” compressor or turbine.
The example low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about 5. The pressure ratio of the example low pressure turbine 46 is measured prior to an inlet of the low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure measured at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle.
A mid-turbine frame 58 of the engine static structure 36 can be arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 58 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28 as well as setting airflow entering the low pressure turbine 46.
The core airflow C is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then by the high pressure compressor 52 mixed with fuel and ignited in the combustor 56 to produce high speed exhaust gases that are then expanded through the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 58 includes vanes 60, which are in the core airflow path and function as an inlet guide vane for the low pressure turbine 46. Utilizing the vane 60 of the mid-turbine frame 58 as the inlet guide vane for low pressure turbine 46 decreases the length of the low pressure turbine 46 without increasing the axial length of the mid-turbine frame 58. Reducing or eliminating the number of vanes in the low pressure turbine 46 shortens the axial length of the turbine section 28. Thus, the compactness of the gas turbine engine 20 is increased and a higher power density may be achieved.
The disclosed gas turbine engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the gas turbine engine 20 includes a bypass ratio greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10). The example geared architecture 48 is an epicyclical gear train, such as a planetary gear system, star gear system or other known gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3.
In one disclosed embodiment, the gas turbine engine 20 includes a bypass ratio greater than about ten (10:1) and the fan diameter is significantly larger than an outer diameter of the low pressure compressor 44. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a gas turbine engine including a geared architecture and that the present disclosure is applicable to other gas turbine engines.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet. The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft., with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of pound-mass (lbm) of fuel per hour being burned divided by pound-force (lbf) of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point.
“Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.50. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is less than about 1.45.
“Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram ° R)/518.7) 0.5]. The “Low corrected fan tip speed”, as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment, is less than about 1150 ft/second.
The example gas turbine engine 20 includes the fan 42 that comprises in one non-limiting embodiment less than about 26 fan blades. In another non-limiting embodiment, the fan section 22 includes less than about 20 fan blades. Moreover, in one disclosed embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes no more than about 6 turbine rotors schematically indicated at 34. In another non-limiting example embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes about 3 turbine rotors. A ratio between the number of fan blades 42 and the number of low pressure turbine rotors is between about 3.3 and about 8.6. The example low pressure turbine 46 provides the driving power to rotate the fan section 22 and therefore the relationship between the number of turbine rotors 34 in the low pressure turbine 46 and the number of blades 42 in the fan section 22 disclose an example gas turbine engine 20 with increased power transfer efficiency.
The rotor disk 72, which can be a fan hub or have another configuration suitable for use in another section of the engine 20, can include one or more grooves 78 in an outer diameter rim portion, as well as mounting flanges 80. In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of curved, generally axially extending grooves 78 having a dovetail shape are provided. In alternative embodiments, the grooves 78 can have other shapes (e.g., fir tree, etc.), lack a curve, be configured as a single circumferential groove, or have other design variations as desired. The mounting flanges 80 in the illustrated embodiment are tab-like structures that extend radially outward from the rim of the disk 72 and are arranged in generally axially-spaced pairs, with each pair positioned between a pair of the grooves 78. A mounting hole 82 can be provided in each flange 80.
The airfoils 74, which can be configured as fan blades or any other type of blades or stators, each have an aerodynamically shaped working portion 84 and a root portion 86. The working portion 84 includes a pressure side 88P and an opposite suction side 88S that both extend between a leading edge 90L and an opposite trailing edge 90T. Typically the pressure side 88P is at least partially concave and the suction side is at least partially convex to provide a cambered airfoil profile. The working portion 84 is configured to interact with fluid flows, such as core flow C and/or bypass flow B. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the working portion 84 of the airfoils 74 can have any configuration as desired for particular applications. The root portion 86 of the airfoils 74 can have a shape that is complementary to the grooves 78 in the disk 72, and helps to retain the airfoil 84 relative to the rotor disk 72. In the illustrated embodiment, the root portion 86 has a dovetail shape, though in further embodiments other shapes are possible (e.g., fir tree, hammerhead, etc.). Furthermore, in the illustrated embodiment the airfoils 74 lack an integral platform. The airfoils 74 and rotor disk 72 are illustrated merely by way of example and not limitation. Numerous other configurations are possible in further embodiments. For example, the airfoils 74 and the disk 72 can be integrally formed in an integrally bladed disk (blisk) configuration.
The spacer 76 is positioned between an adjacent pair of the airfoils 74, and is removably attached to the rotor disk 72 separate from the airfoils 74. The spacer 76 can have an axial length comparable to a chord length of the airfoils 74 at the spanwise location where the spacer 76 adjoins the working portion 84 of the airfoil 74, with the spacer 76 extending slightly forward of the leading edge 90L and slightly aft of the trailing edge 90T. In the illustrated embodiment, the spacer 76 is mechanically attached to a pair of the flanges 80. A fastener 92 (e.g., a pin) is provided that engages the holes 82 in the flanges 80 to secure the spacer 76. In a fully assembled state, one spacer 76 can be provided between each adjacent pair of the airfoils 74. In further embodiments, multiple spacers 76 could be present between any given adjacent pair of the airfoils 74.
In general, the spacer 76 can act as an endwall segment to at least partially bound a fluid flowpath through the engine 20, such as for core flow C. More particularly, the spacer 76 can help separate and space the core flow C (or other flow) from the rotor disk 72 and the roots 86 of the airfoils 74. In the illustrated embodiment, the spacers 76 form segments along a radially inner portion of an endwall of the assembly 70. As will be explained further below, the spacer 76 can be shaped to provide desired aerodynamic characteristics as fluid flows past the assembly 70, for instance, to help reduce undesired secondary flow, which can occur where some working fluid moves in a spanwise (i.e., generally radial) direction along the working portion 84 of the airfoils 74 (with or without swirl or vortex effects).
As shown in
Furthermore, the spacer 76 can include a stiffening structure 104 on the underside surface 100. In the embodiment shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the stiffening structure 104 and the mounting structure 102 are both integrally and monolithically formed with a remainder of the spacer 76. For example, the mounting structure can extend from the stiffening structure 104, such as from the central rib 104A. In further embodiments the stiffening structure 104 and the mounting structure 102 could be separate and spaced from one another, and need not be integral with the remainder of the spacer 76.
The pressure and suction side edges 96P and 96S can each be radiused. Because the spacer 76 is connected to the rotor disk 72 independently of the airfoils 74, there may be relative movement between the spacer 76 and the airfoils 74 during operation. The radius of the pressure and suction side edges 96P and 96S can help reduce a risk of damage to the airfoils 74 should contact occur.
As best shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the first and second depressions 106 and 108 are each generally concave in shape and are spaced apart in the circumferential direction. Furthermore, the first and second depressions 106 and 108 can each be positioned aft of the forward edge 98F of the spacer 76 and forward of the aft edge 98A of the spacer 76. When installed in the assembly 70, the depressions 106, 108 can each be positioned aft of the leading edges 90L of the airfoils 74 and forward of the trailing edges 90T of the airfoils 74. Possible axial locations of leading and trailing edges 90L and 90T are illustrated in
In addition, a protrusion 109 is located on the flowpath surface 94 in the illustrated embodiment. The protrusion 109 is a localized endwall contour feature that locally increases the elevation of the flowpath surface 94 in the radial direction. In that way, the protrusion 109 locally alters the concave shape of the flowpath surface 94, which can help reduce secondary flows during operation in the engine 20, and can help increase adiabatic efficiency and flow capacity, in conjunction with the depressions 106 and 108, such as helping to reduce secondary flow effects along the airfoils 74. One way to conceptualize the protrusion is as a deviation (Δ) from the nominal (i.e., hypothetical) axisymmetric shape of the flowpath surface 94. The protrusion 109 can be located in between the first and second depressions 106 and 108, in the circumferential direction.
In the illustrated embodiment, the protrusion 109 is generally convex in shape. Furthermore, the protrusion 109 can be positioned aft of the forward edge 98F of the spacer 76 and forward of the aft edge 98A of the spacer 76. When installed in the assembly 70, the protrusion 109 can also be positioned aft of the leading edges 90L of the airfoils 74 and forward of the trailing edges 90T of the airfoils 74. As noted above, possible axial locations of leading and trailing edges 90L and 90T are illustrated in
In view of the entirety of the present disclosure, including the accompanying figures, persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the present invention can provide numerous advantages and benefits. For example, the present invention can provide an endwall flowpath surface with a non-axisymmetric contour that can help reduce undesired secondary flow effects, increase adiabatic efficiency and increase flow capacity. This endwall flowpath surface can be implemented on spacers that are separate from airfoil structures. In certain applications, the endwall flowpath contour can alter a geometric relationship between the endwall flowpath surface and adjacent pressure and/or suction sides of adjacent airfoils, such as to provide smaller (i.e., tending to be more acute) angles between the flowpath surface and the airfoil pressure and/or suction sides. Furthermore, the present invention helps provide a relatively low-mass yet sufficiently stiff spacer and can provide relatively tight sealing between the spacer and the adjacent airfoils through the use of optional sealing elements. Other advantages and benefits will also be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The following are non-exclusive descriptions of possible embodiments of the present invention.
A spacer assembly for a rotor assembly of a gas turbine engine can include an endwall segment having a non-axisymmetric flowpath surface, wherein a perimeter of the flowpath surface includes a forward edge, an aft edge, a suction side edge and a pressure side edge; a first depression formed along the flowpath surface adjoining the suction side edge; and a second depression formed along the flowpath surface adjoining the pressure side edge.
The assembly of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A rotor assembly for a gas turbine engine can include a rotor disk; a plurality of airfoils matingly secured to the rotor disk; and a plurality of spacers each positioned between an adjacent pair of airfoils of the plurality of airfoils, at least one of the plurality of spacers including: an endwall segment with a non-axisymmentric flowpath surface, wherein a perimeter of the flowpath surface is defined by a forward edge, an aft edge, a suction side edge and a pressure side edge; and a first depression formed along the flowpath surface adjoining one of the suction side edge and the pressure side edge.
The assembly of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A rotor assembly for a gas turbine engine can include a rotor disk having one or more attachment features; a plurality of airfoils extending from the rotor disk, each airfoil having a suction side and an opposite pressure side; a spacer positioned between an adjacent pair of airfoils of the plurality of airfoils, the spacer including: an endwall segment with a flowpath surface, wherein a perimeter of the flowpath surface includes a forward edge, an aft edge, a suction side edge and a pressure side edge, wherein the suction side edge is positioned adjacent to the suction side of one of the pair of airfoils separated by a suction side gap, and wherein the pressure side edge is positioned adjacent to the pressure side of the other of the pair of airfoils separated by a pressure side gap; and a radial depression formed along the flowpath surface adjoining one of the suction side edge and the pressure side edge; a first seal positioned at least partially along the suction side gap; and a second seal positioned at least partially along the pressure side gap, wherein the first or second seal conforms to a shape of the depression.
The assembly of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A spacer for a gas turbine engine can include an endwall segment having a flowpath surface; and a stiffening structure located opposite the flowpath surface. The stiffening structure can include a central rib; and a plurality of additional ribs extending from the central ribs at acute angles.
The spacer of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
Any relative terms or terms of degree used herein, such as “substantially”, “essentially”, “generally” and the like, should be interpreted in accordance with and subject to any applicable definitions or limits expressly stated herein. In all instances, any relative terms or terms of degree used herein should be interpreted to broadly encompass any relevant disclosed embodiments as well as such ranges or variations as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art in view of the entirety of the present disclosure, such as to encompass ordinary manufacturing tolerance variations, incidental alignment variations, alignment or shape variations induced by thermal, rotational or vibrational operational conditions, and the like.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. For instance, teachings of the present invention can be scaled or relative proportions adjusted as desired for particular applications.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/032189 | 3/15/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/028056 | 2/20/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2918254 | Hausammann | Dec 1959 | A |
3294364 | Stanley | Dec 1966 | A |
3529631 | Riollet | Sep 1970 | A |
3712757 | Goodwin | Jan 1973 | A |
4135857 | Pannone et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4371311 | Walsh | Feb 1983 | A |
4420288 | Bischoff | Dec 1983 | A |
4465433 | Bischoff | Aug 1984 | A |
4500256 | Bessay et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4580946 | Bobo | Apr 1986 | A |
4621979 | Zipps et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4677828 | Matthews et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4778338 | Bessay | Oct 1988 | A |
4832567 | Bessay | May 1989 | A |
4838759 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5193982 | Inizan | Mar 1993 | A |
5224831 | Hermans et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5397215 | Spear et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5464326 | Knott | Nov 1995 | A |
5466123 | Rose | Nov 1995 | A |
5554000 | Katoh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5890874 | Lambert et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5957658 | Kasprow et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6017186 | Hoeger et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6146089 | Allen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158961 | Kehl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6213711 | Muller et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217283 | Ravenhall et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6276897 | Tarada | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283713 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338611 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6419446 | Kvasnak et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447250 | Corrigan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457942 | Forrester | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471474 | Mielke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478539 | Trutschel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478545 | Crall et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6481971 | Forrester | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511294 | Mielke et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514045 | Barton et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520742 | Forrester et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524070 | Carter | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6561761 | Decker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579061 | Heyward et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6634863 | Forrester et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6669445 | Staubach et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672832 | Lecke et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705834 | Jacobsson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6786698 | Warner et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830432 | Scott et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6857853 | Tomberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6969232 | Zess et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7080974 | Lejars et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7134842 | Tam et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7195454 | Lu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217096 | Lee | May 2007 | B2 |
7220100 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7249933 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7354243 | Harvey | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7465155 | Nguyen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484935 | Heitland et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7553125 | Audic et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7637010 | Burgess et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7690890 | Aotsuka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7739865 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7841828 | Liang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7874794 | Solomon et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878763 | Keith | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887297 | Allen-Bradley et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7950900 | Mulcaire et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8061980 | Praisner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070438 | Evans | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105019 | McCaffrey et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8113785 | Forgue et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8192153 | Harvey et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202043 | McCaffrey | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206115 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246310 | Pierrot et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8297935 | Mtilin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342803 | Grohens et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348619 | Derclaye et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20070258818 | Allen-Bradley | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080135530 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080232968 | Nguyen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080267772 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090035130 | Sonoda et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053066 | Lida | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090148282 | McCaffrey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100080708 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100143139 | Pandey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150724 | Forgue | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166558 | Siden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172749 | Mitsuhashi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100196154 | Sakamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100254797 | Grover et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274818 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284818 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110014056 | Guimbard et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110038731 | Evans | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044818 | Kuhne et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110110788 | Guimbard et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123322 | Allen-Bradley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110189023 | Guimbard et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223005 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236200 | Grover et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243749 | Praisner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120014776 | Fulayter et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120057988 | Stiehler | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120121384 | Borufka et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120201688 | Mahle et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201692 | Boston et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120251312 | Johann et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251324 | Johann et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251325 | Dunkel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263587 | Hergt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269619 | Johann | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130004331 | Beeck | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140003949 | Adam et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1503044 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1 681 438 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2 447 476 | May 2012 | EP |
1442526 | Jun 1966 | FR |
2 042 675 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2257755 | Jan 1993 | GB |
2 388 162 | Nov 2003 | GB |
WO 2010068391 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2012007716 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 13829595.1, dated Mar. 11, 2016, 8 pages. |
M. G. Rose, “Non-Axisymmetric Endwall Profiling in the HP NGV's of an Axial Flow Gas Turbine”, ASME 94-GT-249, presented at the Int'l. Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Jun. 13-16, 1994, 8 pages. |
Dr. N. W. Harvey, et al., “Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I Three-Dimensional Linear Design System”, ASME 99-GT-337, presented at Int'l. Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibiton, Jun. 7-10, 1999, 9 pages. |
J. C. Hartland, et al., “Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part II—Experimental Validation”, from Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 122, Apr. 2000, pp. 286-293. |
N. W. Harvey, et al., “Improving Turbine Efficiency Using Non-Axisymmetric End Walls: Validation in the Multi-Row Environment and with Low Aspect Ratio Blading”, ASME GT-2002-30337, proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002, 8 pages. |
N. W. Harvey, et al., “Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I—Three-Dimensional Linear Design System”, rom Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 122, Apr. 2000, pp. 278-285. |
G. Ingram, et al., “The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Turbine Cascade”, ASME GT-2002-30339, proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002, Jun. 3-6, 2001, pp. 135-145. |
G. Brennan, et al., “Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500-HP Turbine Using Nonaxisymmetric End Walls—Part I: Turbine Design”, from Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 125, Jul. 2003; pp. 497-504. |
M. Hoeger, et al., “On the Performance of Compressor Blades with Contoured Endwalls”, from http://www.mtu.de/en/technologies/engineering_news/development/Hoeger_Performance_of_compressor_blades_en.pdf, accessed Jan. 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
L. Fengjun, et al., “Bowed and Twisted Blade Influence on a Turbine Three Dimensional Pressure Field”, from Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, vol. 17 Suppl., Dec. 1996, 10 pages. |
S. Jiexian et al., “Application of a Bowed Blade in a Compressor”, from Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, vol. 11, No. 4, Nov. 1990, 9 pages. |
S. Jiexian et al., “Bowed and Twisted Compound Blade Control of Secondary Flow”, from Journal of Aerospace Power, vol. 6, No. 4, Oct. 1991, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application U.S. Appl. No. PCT/US2013/032189, dated Jan. 16, 2014, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150204201 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61684490 | Aug 2012 | US |