Patent Grant
7547255
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. Ser. No. 10/124,771 filed Apr. 14, 2002, and under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 60/284,699 filed Apr. 17, 2001.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to improved ride surfaces for sliding-type ride attractions, water rides and the like and, in particular, to a variably tensionable membrane ride surface for a simulated surfing wave ride attraction.
2. Description of the Related Art
Water parks and water ride attractions have increased in popularity over the years as an enjoyable family diversion during the hot summer months. Each year water parks invest hundreds of thousands of dollars for ever larger and more exciting water ride attractions to attract increasing numbers of park patrons.
One particularly exciting attraction is the simulated surfing wave water ride attraction known commercially as Flow Rider®. In this attraction, riders ride upon an injected flow of high-speed sheet water flow that is continuously propelled up an inclined ride surface. The thickness and velocity of the injected sheet flow relative to the angle of the inclined ride surface is such that it creates simultaneously a hydroplaning or sliding effect between the ride surface and the rider and/or ride vehicle and also a drag or pulling effect upon a rider and/or ride vehicle hydroplaning upon the sheet flow. By balancing the upward-acting drag forces and the downward-acting gravitational forces, skilled riders are able to maneuver a surfboard (or “flow board”) upon the injected sheet water flow and perform surfing-like water skimming maneuvers thereon for extended periods of time thereby achieving a simulated and/or enhanced surfing wave experience.
For example, my U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,280, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, first disclosed the concept of an artificial simulated wave water ride attraction of this type having an inclined ride surface covered with an injected sheet flow of water upon which riders could perform water skimming maneuvers simulative of actual ocean surfing. Sheet flow water rides are currently in widespread use at many water parks and other locations around the world. Such rides allow the creation of an ideal live-action surfing wave experience even in areas that do not have access to beaches or an ocean.
These and other similar attractions have enjoyed immense popularity among park-going patrons. Owners and operators of park facilities that have installed such attractions have enjoyed significant improvements in park patronage due to the simulated wave water ride attractions and the particularly desirable patrons they attract. In fact, some park owners have demanded more challenging and larger, more powerful wave ride attractions in a bid to attract the most skilled and masterful riders to their parks and to accommodate large-scale professional competitions and the like.
However, current manufacturing techniques are limited in the ability to inexpensively produce large-scale surfing wave ride attractions and the like (e.g. slides, flumes, water coasters, bowls, half-pipes, etc.). According to the current state of the art, ride surfaces for such attractions are generally fabricated from concrete and/or one or more pre-molded fiberglass sections which are sanded smooth and then bolted or otherwise assembled together to form a single, generally continuous ride surface. The ride surface is typically assembled on site and secured to a suitable supporting framework. For ride surfaces susceptible to impacts from riders, a lubricious and/or soft coated foam material is typically adhered or bonded to the exposed “hard” upper concrete or fiberglass support surface to provide a composite ride surface that is both strong enough to support one or more riders, while providing a “soft” non-injurious surface to riders who may fall thereon.
Such composite foam/fiberglass/concrete ride surfaces are expensive and time-consuming to produce. They also suffer from certain physical and other limitations which have made these and other similar composite ride surfaces cost-prohibitive for larger-width ride attractions. The physical demands placed on the ride surface dramatically increase with width, sometimes requiring additional engineering and structural reinforcement to ensure adequate safety and durability. Also, due to size limitations of standard commercial shipping containers, it is often commercially infeasible to prefabricate a large, contoured ride surface as a single integral structure. Presently, most large ride surfaces are poured in concrete on-site and sculpted by hand using highly skilled laborers. But this is an expensive and time-consuming process and depends upon the availability of a suitably skilled local labor force. An alternative approach includes assembling a large number of smaller fiberglass components or sections and securing them to an underlying supporting framework on site. However, this manufacturing and assembly technique produces undesirable seams which can have an adverse affect on the compliance and support characteristics of the underlying ride surface. Because these seams create discontinuities in an otherwise continuous, ride surface, certain latent or imposed stresses, such as thermal expansion and contraction, can have a tendency to focus or concentrate strain energy at the seams, leading to possible buckling and/or cracking of the ride surface at or around the seams. This, in turn, can create undesirable warpage and/or rippling of the ride surface, which can adversely affect ride performance and increase maintenance costs.
In addition, the coated foam material is typically available commercially in only limited widths. Thus, for wider ride surfaces multiple swaths of such foam material must be adhered or bonded to the underlying support surface in a side-by-side fashion with closely abutting edges. But perfectly contiguous alignment and abutment is a difficult condition to achieve and, in any event, the technique creates undesirable seams which are susceptible to ripping, tearing or peeling in addition to some or all of the other deleterious effects described above. The seams in the foam covering and/or the foam covering itself can often leak and thereby admit water in between the foam material and the underlying fiberglass ride surface and/or in between the foam material and the lubricious surface coating thereon. This can cause the formation of undesirable “blisters” which, again, can adversely affect ride performance. If not immediately arrested, the blisters can quickly degenerate into a major ride surface delamination problem, possibly requiring complete resurfacing of the ride surface. Again, this increases the expense of maintaining a ride attraction having such composite foam/fiberglass/concrete ride surface or other “hard” support surface. These and other manufacturing and structural hurdles have made the large ride attractions quite expensive to construct and maintain.
Current state-of-the-art composite fiberglass and concrete ride surfaces—due to their rigid and static nature—also fail to fully simulate the kinematic motion and reactive hydraulic forces or “bounce” associated with true deep-water ocean surfing. A stiff, unyielding ride surface can thus impair or hinder ride performance and maneuverability of amateur riders, particularly in flat or gently curved sections of the ride.
Accordingly, there is a need for an alternative ride surface and method of fabrication thereof which does not suffer from all or some of the aforenoted drawbacks.
A ride surface constructed in accordance with the present invention overcomes some or all of the aforenoted drawbacks and disadvantages. In one preferred embodiment the invention provides a membrane ride surface fabricated from a relatively inexpensive fabric, plastic film or composite material that is placed under tension over a supporting framework. Advantageously, the tensioned membrane ride surface in accordance with the invention serves the dual purpose of providing structural support for water flow and riders thereon while at the same time providing an impact safe surface that is non-injurious to riders who may fall thereon. Because the membrane material serves both support and impact functions, there is no need to adhere an additional foam layer material thereon to provide protection from rider impacts. This results in a less-expensive, more durable and long-lasting ride surface that is not afflicted by the afore-mentioned blistering and delamination problems. Moreover, because the membrane is stretched and tensioned to form a supporting ride surface, it is capable of absorbing significantly more energy during rider impact, as compared to a layer of soft foam material adhered to a relatively hard fiberglass support surface. Thus it is safer for riders and facilitates more extreme and exciting maneuvering, such as flips, spins, twists, lip bashes, and cartwheels, with a greater degree of safety. Advantageously, the membrane is also capable of supporting varying tensions and so the compliance or “trampoline effect” of the ride surface can be adjusted to provide a desired level of bounce and reactive forces to accommodate varying rider skill levels and/or to provide a more “deep water” surfing feel by more closely simulating the hydraulic forces associated with deep-water surfing on a propagating ocean wave.
Suitable membrane materials can be purchased and/or glued/hemmed/welded together to form any desired width of contiguous material. Thus a single integral ride surfacing material may be provided that can easily be packaged and shipped using standard shipping containers and the like. The ride surface and the underlying supporting frame can easily be assembled and adjusted on site with standard assembly tooling (e.g., a ratchet, wrench, and tensioning bar). Thus, on-site labor and material costs are significantly reduced.
The membrane ride surface is preferably formed from a substantially contiguous sheet of fabric/plastic and/or other strong, pliable sheet material. The membrane is tensioned at its edges to provide the desired rigidity to support a sheet water flow and riders thereon while at the same time providing sufficient compliance to provide energy absorption in the event of a fallen rider impacting the ride surface. Advantageously, the tensioned membrane design provides inherent flexibility in that the tension of the membrane can be adjusted actively and/or passively in order to accommodate different and varied ride experiences. Also, the shape of the membrane ride surface (and, thus, the size, shape and nature of the sheet water flow and simulated wave forms thereon) can be changed either actively or passively by special tensioning techniques and/or by using air bladders, pressure/suction, foam supports or/or the like. Thus, the invention provides heretofore unknown flexibility and wave riding challenge.
In one embodiment the invention provides a ride attraction comprising an inclined ride surface adapted to safely support one or more ride participants and/or ride vehicles sliding thereon. The inclined ride surface comprises a substantially continuous sheet of membrane material supported along at least two edges thereof by a supporting framework. The membrane material has a coating thereon, such as a fluorinated polymer, adapted to provide a substantially smooth and generally lubricous sliding surface. The membrane material is tensioned so as to provide a resilient, impact-safe support surface for ride participants and/or ride vehicles sliding thereon. One or more nozzles may be further provided for injecting a sheet flow of water upon the ride surface and thereby simulating an ocean surfing experience. Auxiliary support structures may be added for additional support of the ride surface and/or to create various desired dynamic ride effects.
In another embodiment the invention provides a ride surface for ride attractions and the like. The ride surface comprises a fabric-reinforced membrane material supported by a structural framework tensioning the fabric-reinforced material to at least about 10 Kgf/cm. The membrane material is coated with a friction-reducing material adapted to facilitate sliding thereon by ride patrons. If desired, one or more nozzles may be provided for injecting a sheet flow of water upon the ride surface and thereby simulating an ocean surfing experience. Auxiliary support structures may also be added for additional support of the ride surface and/or to create various desired dynamic ride effects.
In another embodiment the invention provides a kit for assembling, a ride attraction. The kit comprises a fabric-reinforced ride surface sized and adapted to safely support one or more ride participants and/or ride vehicles thereon. A supporting framework is also provided and is adapted to support and apply tension to the membrane ride surface. Tensioning means are provided for adjusting the amount of tension applied by the framework to the ride surface whereby a resilient supporting surface is provided for safely supporting one or more riders. Again, one or more nozzles may be further provided, if desired, for injecting a sheet flow of water upon the ride surface and thereby simulating an ocean surfing experience. Auxiliary support structures may also be added for additional support of the ride surface and/or to create various desired dynamic ride effects.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain objects and advantages of the invention have been described herein above. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
Having thus summarized the general nature of the invention and its essential features and advantages, certain preferred embodiments and modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description herein having reference to the figures that follow, of which:
As illustrated in
In operation (see, e.g.,
Two preferred alternative hydraulic/pump configurations are illustrated in
The thickness and velocity of the injected sheet flow 170 relative to the angle of the inclined ride surface 150 is preferably such that it creates simultaneously a hydroplaning or sliding effect between the ride surface and a rider/vehicle 10 thereon and also an upward directed drag or pulling effect upon the rider/vehicle 10 hydroplaning upon the sheet flow 170. By balancing the upward-acting drag forces and the downward-acting gravitational forces, a skilled rider 10 is able to maneuver a specially modified surfboard 25 (“flow board”) or body board upon the injected sheet water flow 170 and generally perform surfing-like water skimming maneuvers thereon for extended periods of time, thereby achieving a simulated and/or enhanced surfing wave experience.
In particular, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
The sluice cover 125 preferably comprises a contoured flexible pad which covers and extends over the top surface of the nozzle 120. The pad is preferably spring-loaded in a downward direction to keep spring tension against the jetted water flow 170 and thus minimize the possibility of a rider 10 catching a finger underneath the pad when sliding up and over the pad. The pad ranges from 1/16th inch thick at it furthest downstream point to approximately 1 inch thick where it abuts to a fixed decking 135. The pad is preferably made out of any suitable soft flexible material that will avoid injury upon impact, yet rigid enough to hold its shape under prolonged use. Suitable pad materials include a 2 lb (0.9 kg) density closed cell polyurethane foam core that is coated with a tough but resilient rubber or plastic, e.g., polyurethane paint or vinyl laminate. See, for example, my published PCT application PCT/US00/21196 designated as publication number WO01/08770, hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Alternatively, the sluice slide over cover 125 may comprise a flexible pad to which is bonded or upholstered a membrane material similar to that described herein-above for ride surface 150. Of course, a variety of other suitable designs and materials may also be used as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
As indicated above, the ride surface 150 is preferably fabricated from a suitably strong fabric/membrane material 300 that is suitably tensioned over an underlying supporting framework 110. The membrane is preferably tensioned at its edges to provide the desired rigidity to support a sheet water flow and riders thereon. Advantageously, the tensioned membrane design provides inherent versatility in that the tension of the membrane can be adjusted actively and/or passively in order to accommodate different and varied ride experiences. Also, the shape of the membrane ride surface can be changed either actively or passively by special tensioning techniques and/or by using air bladders, suction, foam supports or/or the like.
Examples of suitable fabric/membrane materials include a wide variety of sheet or fabric materials formed from fibers or yarns comprising one or more of the following: carbon fiber, Kevlar®, rayon, nylon, polyester, PVC, PVDF and/or similarly strong, durable fibrous materials. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,574,107 to Ferrari, incorporated herein by reference. As illustrated in more detail in
One particularly preferred type of membrane material 300 comprises high-strength polyester 1670/2200 Dtex PES HT yarns woven to form a high-strength fabric base cloth. The base cloth is preferably tensioned substantially equally in weft and warp while a polymer coating approximately 200-300 μm thick is applied to the top and bottom surfaces thereof. The upper surface 320 (the ride surface) is additionally coated with a fluorinated polymer material 325, such as PVDF, approximately 10-50 μm thick, providing a durable, lubricious sliding surface. Preferably, the finished fabric/membrane material has an overall thickness of between about 0.5 and 2.0 mm (1.2 mm being most preferred) and a weight less than about 5.0 kg/m2, more preferably less than about 2.0 kg/m2, and most preferably about 1.5 kg/m2. Suitable fabric/membrane materials are preferably selected to have a tensile strength greater than about 20 kgf/cm, more preferably greater than about 50 kgf/cm, and most preferably greater than about 80 kgf/cm as determined by NF EN ISO 1421 FTMS 191A (Method 5102), and a tear strength preferably greater than about 50 kgf, more preferably greater than about 75 kgf, and most preferably greater than about 90 kgf, as determined by DIN 53.363 ASTM D 5733-95 (Trapezoid Method), and with a maximum elongation under design load of preferably less than about 1% in either weft or warp.
Suitable materials meeting the above preferred specifications are readily available commercially in relatively wide swaths. If desired, multiple swaths of fabric/membrane material can also be hemmed, glued or, more preferably, welded together to form very wide continuous swaths of continuous material to meet virtually any ride surfacing need. Thus a single integral ride surfacing material is provided that can easily be packaged and shipped using standard containers and the like.
Advantageously, the tensioned membrane ride surface 150 in accordance with the invention serves the dual purpose of providing adequate support for water flow and riders thereon while at the same time providing an impact-safe surface that is non-injurious to riders who may fall thereon. Because the membrane material serves both functions, there is no need to adhere an additional foam layer material thereon to provide protection from rider impacts. As noted above, this results in significant cost savings and also avoids the afore-mentioned blistering and delamination problems. Thus a safer, more durable and inexpensive ride surface is provided. Moreover, the ride surface 150 and the underlying supporting frame 110 can easily be assembled and adjusted on site using standard hand-tools, reducing on-site labor and material costs.
Preferably, the membrane material 150 is maintained in tension via multiple tensioning spars 155 distributed along the length of the ride surface 150. As illustrated in more detail in
Preferably, the amount and direction(s) of tension applied to the membrane is such that the membrane material 300 forms a resilient supporting surface 150 capable of supporting a sheet flow of water thereon and one or more riders, while providing a compliant, energy-absorbing surface capable of safely absorbing the impact of possible fallen riders thereon. A preferred range of tension is between about 10 kgf/cm and 80 kgf/cm, more preferably between about 20 kgf/cm and 60 kgf/cm, and most preferably between about 30 kgf/cm and 40 kgf/cm. If desired, one or more spring-biased elements may also be used, in order to provide tension overload regulation and to thereby protect the ride surface 150 from tearing in the event of a very large or unexpected impact force.
As illustrated in
Preferably, the supporting framework 110 is be shaped and/or the membrane ride surface 150 is selectively tensioned (evenly or unevenly) so as to impart a desired slope and/or curvature to the ride surface 150, as desired. The curvature may be a simple curve as illustrated in
In the particular embodiment illustrated, the framework 110 and the amount and direction(s) of tension applied to the membrane ride surface 150 are substantially fixed or static, subject to only periodic adjustment or modification as may be necessary or desired. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the shape of the ride surface 150 may be adjusted dynamically, if desired, by suitably altering or controlling the shape of the supporting frame, applied tension, and/or by adjusting selected pressure or vacuum forces applied underneath the ride surface 150. For example, dynamically inflatable bladders, adjustable foam supports/rollers and/or other auxiliary support structures (not shown) may be implemented in the illustrated embodiment to provide a dynamically changing ride surface, if desired. These may be controlled hydraulically, pneumatically, mechanically, electrically or otherwise as well-know to those skilled in the art. Such a dynamic ride surface may be advantageous, for example, for competitions wherein different wave shapes and/or wave riding difficulty levels are desired. A dynamic ride surface could also be highly advantageous in providing a challenging wave riding experience providing progressively steeper, random and/or unpredictable changes in the shape of the ride surface during operation.
Of course, the invention disclosed and described herein is not limited to use with simulated surfing wave ride attractions as illustrated and described above. Rather, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the ride surface 150 may, alternatively, be incorporated into or otherwise used in connection with a wide variety of other sliding-type water and/or non-water ride attractions, such as flumes, slides, bowls, half-pipes, parabolic/oscillating slides and/or the like. Those skilled in the art will also recognize that a number of obvious modifications and improvements may be made to the invention without departing from the essential spirit and scope of the invention as disclosed herein.
Thus, although the invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2558759 | Johnson | Jul 1951 | A |
| 3120385 | Hall | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3547749 | White et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 4087088 | Kelso | May 1978 | A |
| 4147844 | Babinsky et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4339122 | Croul | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4474369 | Gordon | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4574107 | Ferrari | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4988364 | Perusich et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5219315 | Fuller et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5370591 | Jewell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5384019 | Keating et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385518 | Turner | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5447636 | Banerjee | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5738590 | Lochtefeld | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5827608 | Rinehart et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6019547 | Hill | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6132317 | Lochtefeld | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6676530 | Lochtefeld | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 223 414 | Apr 1990 | GB |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050148398 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
