The present invention relates generally to contraception, and more particularly to intrafallopian contraceptive devices and nonsurgical methods for their delivery.
Worldwide demand exists for safe, effective methods of both contraception and permanent sterilization. Although a variety of contraception and sterilization methods are available, all of the existing methods have limitations and disadvantages. Thus, the need for additional safe, low cost, reliable methods of contraception and permanent sterilization, both in developed and less developed countries, is widely recognized.
Many presently available contraception methods require significant user involvement, and user non-compliance results in quite high rates of failure. While the theoretical effectiveness of existing contraceptives, including barrier methods and hormonal therapies, is well established, overcoming user noncompliance to improve overall efficacy has proven difficult.
One form of contraception which is less susceptible to user noncompliance is the intrauterine device (IUD). IUDs have been found to have higher rates of reliability, and are effective for a longer period of time, than most other commercially available contraceptives. Unfortunately, IUDs are also associated with serious infectious complications. For this reason, the use of IUDs within the United States has decreased dramatically. Additionally, IUDs are subject to unplanned expulsion, and must be removed due to excessive pain or bleeding in a percentage of cases, further reducing the acceptance of the IUD as a contraceptive method. Interestingly, the efficacy of copper IUDs appears to be higher than that of non-metallic IUDs. The reason for this has not been fully explained.
Commercially available options for permanent sterilization include fallopian tube ligation and vasectomy. These methods are surgical, are difficult to reverse, and are not available to many people in the world. It is common knowledge that fertilization occurs in the fallopian tubes where the sperm and ovum meet. Tubal ligation avoids this by complete occlusion of the fallopian tubes.
It has previously been proposed to reversibly occlude the fallopian tubes, for example, by in vitro formation of an elastomeric plug, or otherwise anchoring a device on either side of the narrowest region of fallopian tube, called the “isthmus.” Such fallopian tube occlusion methods appear promising; however, an unacceptably high percentage of the non-surgical devices proposed to date have become dislodged during previous studies. Even where non-surgical intrafallopian devices have remained in place, they have been found to be only moderately effective at preventing conception.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide effective, reliable intrafallopian devices for contraception and sterilization. It would be particularly desirable to provide highly effective intrafallopian devices which did not require surgery for placement. It would be especially desirable if such devices and methods allowed easy placement of the device, but were less susceptible to being dislodged than previously proposed non-surgical intrafallopian devices.
The experimental use of a stainless steel intrafallopian device is described in Transcatheter Tubal Sterilization in Rabbits, Penny L. Ross, RT 29 “Investigative Radiology”, pp. 570-573 (1994). The experimental use of an electrolytically pure copper wire as a surgical contraceptive intrafallopian device in rats was described in “Antifertility Effect of an Intrafallopian Tubal Copper Device”, D.N. Gupta, 14 Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, pp. 316-319 (May 1976).
U.K. Patent Application Pub. No. 2,211,095 describes a uterine screw plug for blocking the fallopian tube. European Patent Application Pub. No. 0,010,812 describes a device for placement in the oviducts having enlargements at either end for anchoring the device. The same device appears to be described in Netherlands Patent No. 7,810,696.
The use of tubal occlusion devices is described in “Hysteroscopic Oviduct Blocking With Formed-in-Place Silicone Rubber Plugs”, Robert A. Erb, Ph.D., et al., The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, pp. 65-68 (Aug. 1979). A formed-In-place elastomeric tubal occlusion device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,805,767, issued to Erb. U.S. Pat. No. 5,065,751, issued to Wolf, describes a method and apparatus for reversibly occluding a biological tube. U.S. Pat. No. 4,612,924, issued to Cimber, describes an intrauterine contraceptive device which seals the mouths of the fallopian tubes.
German Patent No. 28 03 685, issued to Brundin, describes a device for plugging a body duct with a device which swells when in contact with a body fluid.
Alternative contraceptive devices are disclosed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/475,252, the full disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
The present invention provides intrafallopian devices and methods for their placement to prevent conception. The intrafallopian devices of the present invention are transcervically delivered, resiliently anchored structures which are formed at least in part from copper to provide long term contraception, or alternatively permanent sterilization, without the need for surgical procedures or the increased bleeding, pain, and risks of infection associated with intrauterine devices (IUDs).
The use of copper in the intrafallopian device of the present invention improves its efficacy as a contraceptive method. Devices formed from plastically deformable materials, however, are less readily restrained in the fallopian tube. Apparently, the large variation in the actual shape and dimensions of fallopian tubes does not provide reliable anchoring for a pre-formed deformable intrafallopian device. The intrafallopian device of the present invention therefore comprises a resilient structure, usually a metallic coil, which includes a copper alloy, a copper plating, or copper fibers, ideally comprising an alloy including at least 75% copper. The coil material typically includes beryllium, zinc, stainless steel, platinum, a shape memory alloy such as Nitinol™, or the like. Preferably, the coil is composed of an alloy of beryllium and copper. Although the present device will generally result in occlusion, it need not completely occlude the fallopian tube to prevent the meeting of the sperm and ovum. Instead, the presence of the copper on the resilient structure is sufficient to provide effective contraception.
Conveniently, the present invention further comprises non-surgical placement of such intrafallopian devices by transcervical introduction. The resilient structure is restrainable in a straight configuration, e.g., by inserting the device within a catheter, greatly facilitating and reducing the risks of introduction. Thus, the cost and dangers associated with existing surgical contraceptive and sterilization procedures are avoided.
In a first aspect, a contraceptive intrafallopian device according to the present invention comprises a resilient structure having a proximal end and a distal end. The resilient structure comprises copper, and is biased to form at least one bend near the proximal end of the primary coil. Similarly, the resilient structure is also biased to form at least one bend near its distal end. These proximal and distal bends define an isthmus-traversing region therebetween. Preferably, the isthmus-traversing region also includes at least one bend, thereby helping to anchor the coil within the fallopian tube.
Generally, the resilient structure of the present intrafallopian device will be formed as a primary coil. To help restrain the coil within the fallopian tube, fibers are attached to some embodiments of the coil, the fibers optionally comprising a polyester material such as Rayon™, Dacron™, or the like. Alternatively, copper fibers may be used to increase the exposed copper surface area, the copper fibers generally having a diameter on the order of 0.001 inches.
The bends of the present intrafallopian device are generally formed as a secondary shape imposed on a primary coil. The primary coil is most easily formed as a straight cylindrical coil. The secondary shape will be imposed on the primary coil by bending, optionally heat treating the primary coil while bent. The individual bends may take a wide variety of forms, including sinusoidal curves, the individual loops of a continuous secondary coil, or the like. However, the secondary shape generally defines an overall width which is larger than the fallopian tube, so that the tubal wall restrains the resilient structure when it is released.
Preferably, each of the bends of the present intrafallopian device forms a loop in the primary coil when in a relaxed state. Ideally, the loops are separated by straight sections of coil. The alternating of loops with straight sections of coil forms a large diameter “flower coil,” which provides a large relaxed overall width, and also features bends at tight radius, both of which promote retention. Conveniently, the primary coil generally has a diameter less than that of the fallopian tube, and can be restrained in a straight configuration for placement within the fallopian tube, typically by inserting the primary coil within a delivery catheter.
In another aspect, a contraceptive intrafallopian device according to the present invention comprises a resilient primary coil having a primary coil diameter. The primary coil comprises copper, and forms a secondary shape when in a relaxed state. The secondary shape defines a plurality of bends and an overall width which is larger than the primary coil diameter. Thus the primary coil can be easily anchored in a fallopian tube which is smaller in diameter than the secondary shape. Preferably, the present device reacts with a force sufficient to prevent axial movement of the device within the fallopian tube when restrained in a lumen having a diameter in the range between 0.5 mm and 3 mm. The actual anchoring force will depend on the shape of the coil and the modulus of elasticity of the material used.
In yet another aspect, a intrafallopian contraceptive delivery system according to the present invention comprises an elongate body in which the resilient primary coil described above is slidably disposed. A shaft is also slidably disposed within the elongate body and is located proximally of the primary coil. The distal end of the shaft includes a coil interface surface, while the elongate body restrains the primary coil in a straight configuration.
Preferably, a bend in the isthmus-traversing region of the present intrafallopian device, together with the proximal and distal anchor bends, restrains the resilient structure within the isthmus of the fallopian tube. The distal anchor is inserted into the ampulla, distal of the isthmus, while the proximal anchor is located in the ostium, proximal of the isthmus. Unintended movement of the device is further avoided by locating the isthmus-traversing region within the isthmus to resiliently impose anchoring forces against the tubal wall.
In a still further aspect, an intrafallopian contraceptive method according to the principles of the present invention comprises restraining a resilient structure in a straight configuration and transcervically inserting the resilient structure into a fallopian tube. The resilient structure is affixed within the isthmus by releasing a bent isthmus-traversing region. The bend of the isthmus-traversing region exerts a force against the wall of the fallopian tube, anchoring the device within the isthmus. Preferably, a distal anchor on the resilient structure is released distally of the isthmus, and a proximal anchor is released proximally of the isthmus, the distal and proximal anchors generally formed from bends in the resilient structure. Optionally, an electric current is applied through the resilient structure to the fallopian tube, thereby effecting permanent sterilization.
The present invention encompasses a contraceptive intrafallopian device which can alternatively be used as both a permanent and a reversible means of contraception. The present contraceptive methods and devices minimize the danger of non-use which has limited the efficacy of prior art contraceptive techniques. Moreover, the location of the present devices within the fallopian tubes provides a reduced risk of the infectious complications, increased bleeding, and pelvic pain associated with intrauterine devices (IUDs). Furthermore, the location and the novel shape of the present intrafallopian device provides significant advantages over IUDs, which have been found to be susceptible to unplanned expulsion and removal due to excessive pain and bleeding. The present invention takes advantage of the increase in effectiveness associated with copper IUDs, providing a resilient structure including copper which may be transcervically positioned without the need for surgery.
Although the present contraceptive method may be included within a group of contraceptive techniques generally referred to as fallopian tube occlusion methods, the present invention does not necessarily rely solely on blocking the fallopian tube to prevent fertilization. Instead, contraception is apparently provided by disrupting of ovum transport, the process of fertilization, and/or cleavage of the ovum. While the effect that copper has on these processes is not fully understood, it does appear that copper intrafallopian devices offer potentially significant increases in effectiveness over intrafallopian devices formed of other materials. Optionally, the present invention further encompasses devices which promote tissue growth within the tube to induce tubal occlusion, further inhibiting conception.
The present invention is anchored within the isthmus of the fallopian tube, overcoming the unintended expulsion of the device and the resulting failure of the contraceptive method. Such intrafallopian device expulsion has been the single greatest factor limiting the efficacy of easily positioned intrafallopian contraceptive techniques.
The present intrafallopian devices are generally elongate resilient structures preformed into secondary shapes. These secondary shapes will bias the resilient structure so as to provide strong forces against the lumen wall of the fallopian tube. Clearly, the secondary shape must have a larger outer diameter than the inner diameter of the fallopian tube.
Conveniently, the present resilient structures are insertable into a catheter, the catheter wall restraining the resilient structure in a straight configuration. As the resilient structure has an outer diameter when in the straight configuration which is less than the inner diameter of the fallopian tube, the catheter containing the present intrafallopian device is easily transcervically introduced. Moreover, the device is readily removed by snaring the resilient structure near the proximal end and pulling proximally on the resilient structure, thereby straightening the resilient structure and allowing it to be withdrawn without injuring the fallopian tube. Alternatively, an electrical current is applied to the device after it is at least partially releasing the fallopian tube, providing permanent sterilization.
Referring now to
The primary coil 12 of intrafallopian device 10 includes a proximal end 14 and a distal end 16. Between these ends, three loops 20 are formed, each having an inner diameter 22. Located between loops 20 are straight sections 24, which increase the overall cross-section of the intrafallopian device to an overall width 26. Preferably, inner diameter 22 is in the range from 2 mm to 10 mm, while overall width 26 is at least 6 mm, ideally being in the range from 8 mm to 40 mm. Distal and proximal ends 14, 16 each include an atraumatic endcap 18 to prevent injury to the fallopian tube.
Preferably, primary coil 12 is formed from a beryllium copper alloy wire. Beryllium copper provides the resilience necessary to avoid expulsion of the device, and also provides the increased effectiveness of a copper contraceptive intrafallopian device. Alternatively, primary coil 12 is formed from a resilient metal, such as stainless steel, platinum, a shape memory alloy, or the like. If such materials are used, primary coil 12 is preferably plated with copper or a copper alloy or otherwise has copper attached.
To further reduce the possibility of expulsion of intrafallopian device 10, fibers are optionally carried on primary coil 12. The fibers may be short individual fibers, or may alternatively be wound into primary coil 12. Preferably, the fibers comprise copper, thereby increasing the total copper surface area. Such copper fibers are preferably bonded to primary coil 12 with solder, brazing, a polymeric adhesive, or the like. Alternatively, polyester fibers such as Dacron™, Rayon™, or the like, are bonded to the surface of primary coil 12 using a polymeric adhesive. The polyester fibers promote increased tissue growth around the coil, thus further reducing the possibility of expulsion of the device from the fallopian tube.
A secondary shape has been superimposed on the primary coil to form intrafallopian device 10, the secondary shape comprising loops 20 separated by straight sections 24. This secondary shape is herein referred to as a “flower coil.” The flower coil shape is particularly advantageous in that outer diameter 26 is substantially larger than the primary coil diameter, while the individual loops 20 have relatively small inner diameters 22 which will maintain the largest possible anchoring force against the fallopian tube. Minimizing inner diameter 22 also ensures that anchoring force is applied within the fallopian tube, despite the curvature of the fallopian tube.
Referring now to
In both embodiments of the present intrafallopian device 10, 30, at least one loop adjacent to the proximal end is disposed proximally of the narrowest portion of the fallopian tube, referred to as the isthmus. Similarly, at least one loop of the intrafallopian device is disposed distally of the isthmus. These proximal and distal loops act as anchors, helping to prevent proximal or distal movement of the intrafallopian device. In the embodiment of
Alternative intrafallopian device 30 may be positioned with multiple loops acting as proximal or distal anchors, or may alternatively have all but the proximal and distal anchor loops disposed along the fallopian tube to act as anchors within the lumen of that body. Advantageously, the embodiment of
Referring now to
Intrafallopian delivery catheter 50 receives the present intrafallopian device within the distal end of lumen 56 of elongate body 52. Lumen 56 has an inner diameter which is slightly larger than outer diameter 36 of the primary coil. The present intrafallopian device is therefore straightened to a straight configuration as it is loaded proximally into the distal end of lumen 56. Elongate body 52 is sufficiently strong to restrain the primary coil in the straight configuration, but must remain sufficiently flexible to allow maneuvering within the body lumen. Elongate body 52 is preferably formed from an inelastic, flexible material such as polyurethane, PET, or the like.
Referring now to
Use of the present contraceptive intrafallopian device will be described with reference to
After elongate body 52 extends past isthmus 80, guide wire 78 is removed. An intrafallopian device according to the present invention is inserted in the proximal end of elongate body 52, the intrafallopian device being restrained in a straight configuration by the elongate body. The device is advanced distally using shaft 54, the shaft and elongate body forming delivery catheter 50 (
Once delivery catheter 50 is properly positioned, elongate body 52 may be axially withdrawn. Shaft 54 axially restrains the intrafallopian device at the target location during withdrawal of elongate body 52, as described regarding
The present invention further encompasses permanent sterilization by passing a current through the shaft to the intrafallopian device after elongate body 52 has been partially withdrawn, but before the intrafallopian device is fully released. Fallopian tube tissue in contact with the intrafallopian device is dessechated, and thus attached to the present intrafallopian device. This action also causes permanent tubal damage, leading to the formation of scar tissue which encapsulates the intrafallopian device and causes permanent occlusion of the tubal lumen. Clearly, the resilient member/shaft interface must be conductive to allow the present non-surgical method of permanent sterilization.
In conclusion, the present invention provides a contraceptive intrafallopian device which may be positioned without surgery. While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. For example, a wide variety of secondary shapes, including open loops, continuous bends, sinusoidal curves, or the like, may be imposed on the primary coil. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined instead solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/846,047, filed May 14, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/591,874, filed Jun. 12, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,871,650, entitled “Contraceptive Transcervical Fallopian Tube Occlusion Devices and Their Delivery”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/474,779, filed Jun. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,240, entitled “Contraceptive Transcervical Fallopian Tube Occlusion Devices and Their Delivery”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2102270 | Hyams | Dec 1937 | A |
2365296 | Schimpf | Dec 1944 | A |
3042030 | Read | Jul 1962 | A |
3334629 | Cohn | Aug 1967 | A |
3404682 | Waldron | Oct 1968 | A |
3405711 | Bakunin | Oct 1968 | A |
3422813 | Braley et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3463141 | Mozolf | Aug 1969 | A |
3467090 | Zollett | Sep 1969 | A |
3561438 | Canel | Feb 1971 | A |
3563235 | Zipper | Feb 1971 | A |
3598115 | Horne, Jr. | Aug 1971 | A |
3620212 | Fannon et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3675639 | Cimber | Jul 1972 | A |
3675642 | Lord | Jul 1972 | A |
3680542 | Climber | Aug 1972 | A |
3687129 | Nuwavser | Aug 1972 | A |
3722500 | Robinson | Mar 1973 | A |
3760806 | Leeper | Sep 1973 | A |
3763856 | Blomberg | Oct 1973 | A |
3768102 | Kwan-Gett et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3774600 | Cognat | Nov 1973 | A |
3803308 | Zipper | Apr 1974 | A |
3805767 | Erb | Apr 1974 | A |
3840016 | Lindemann | Oct 1974 | A |
3858571 | Rudolph | Jan 1975 | A |
3858586 | Lessen | Jan 1975 | A |
3868956 | Alfidi et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3895634 | Berger et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3918431 | Sinnreich | Nov 1975 | A |
3926195 | Bleier et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3938527 | Rioux et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3973560 | Emmett | Aug 1976 | A |
3982542 | Ford et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4003380 | Wien | Jan 1977 | A |
RE29345 | Erb | Aug 1977 | E |
4040417 | Zipper | Aug 1977 | A |
4057063 | Gieles et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4085743 | Yoon | Apr 1978 | A |
4111196 | Emmett | Sep 1978 | A |
4135495 | Borgen | Jan 1979 | A |
4136695 | Dafoe | Jan 1979 | A |
4140126 | Choudhury | Feb 1979 | A |
4143656 | Holmes | Mar 1979 | A |
4158050 | Zipper | Jun 1979 | A |
4160446 | Barrington | Jul 1979 | A |
4181725 | Voorhees et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4185618 | Corey | Jan 1980 | A |
4207891 | Boldue | Jun 1980 | A |
4245623 | Erb | Jan 1981 | A |
4246896 | Horne, Jr. et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4326511 | Zimerman | Apr 1982 | A |
4353363 | Sopena Quesada | Oct 1982 | A |
4365621 | Brundin | Dec 1982 | A |
4374523 | Yoon | Feb 1983 | A |
4416660 | Dafoe | Nov 1983 | A |
4478837 | Schenker | Oct 1984 | A |
4485814 | Yoon | Dec 1984 | A |
4503569 | Dotter | Mar 1985 | A |
4509504 | Brundin | Apr 1985 | A |
4523590 | Roth et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4537186 | Verschoof et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4572162 | Livesay et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4574806 | McCarthy | Mar 1986 | A |
4579110 | Hamou | Apr 1986 | A |
4595000 | Hamou | Jun 1986 | A |
4601698 | Moulding, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4606336 | Zeluff | Aug 1986 | A |
4612924 | Cimber | Sep 1986 | A |
4628924 | Cimber | Dec 1986 | A |
4638803 | Rand | Jan 1987 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4700701 | Montaldi | Oct 1987 | A |
4715365 | Cimber | Dec 1987 | A |
4717387 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4724832 | Strubel et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727866 | Livesay et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731052 | Seitz, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4788966 | Yoon | Dec 1988 | A |
4805618 | Ueda et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808399 | Rypacek et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4821741 | Mohajer | Apr 1989 | A |
4824434 | Seitz, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846834 | Von Recum et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4932421 | Kaali et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932422 | Ragheb | Jun 1990 | A |
4937254 | Sheffield et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4943290 | Rexroth et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969458 | Wiktor | Nov 1990 | A |
4970298 | Silver et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4983177 | Wolf | Jan 1991 | A |
4994069 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002552 | Casey | Mar 1991 | A |
5065751 | Wolf | Nov 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5095917 | Vancaillie | Mar 1992 | A |
5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
5122136 | Guglielmi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122137 | Lennox | Jun 1992 | A |
5133709 | Prince | Jul 1992 | A |
5147353 | Everett et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147370 | McNamara et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195964 | Kletzky et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197978 | Hess | Mar 1993 | A |
5207684 | Nobles | May 1993 | A |
5222964 | Cooper | Jun 1993 | A |
5226911 | Chee et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234437 | Sepetka | Aug 1993 | A |
5250071 | Palermo | Oct 1993 | A |
5254132 | Barley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5259836 | Thurmond et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261916 | Engleson | Nov 1993 | A |
5303719 | Wilk et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304194 | Chee et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304195 | Twyford, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304228 | Prince | Apr 1994 | A |
5312415 | Palermo | May 1994 | A |
5330483 | Heaven et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
5346498 | Greelis et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350397 | Palermo et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354295 | Guglielmi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354309 | Schnepp-Pesch et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356388 | Sepetka et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364393 | Auth et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366472 | Hillstead | Nov 1994 | A |
5377668 | Ehmsen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382259 | Phelps et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382260 | Dormandy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382261 | Palmaz | Jan 1995 | A |
5389089 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389100 | Bacich et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5411549 | Peters | May 1995 | A |
5423829 | Pham et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423849 | Engelson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433708 | Nichols et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
5458636 | Brancato | Oct 1995 | A |
5469867 | Schmitt | Nov 1995 | A |
5474089 | Waynant | Dec 1995 | A |
5499995 | Teirstein | Mar 1996 | A |
5507768 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514176 | Bosley, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5522822 | Phelps et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5522836 | Palermo | Jun 1996 | A |
5534007 | St. Germain et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545210 | Hess et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549624 | Mirigian et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555896 | Cimber | Sep 1996 | A |
5556396 | Cohen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562641 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562654 | Smith | Oct 1996 | A |
5569245 | Guglielmi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578074 | Mirigian | Nov 1996 | A |
5582619 | Ken | Dec 1996 | A |
5601593 | Freitag | Feb 1997 | A |
5601600 | Ton | Feb 1997 | A |
5624449 | Pham et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624461 | Mariant | Apr 1997 | A |
5630797 | Diedrich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634877 | Salama | Jun 1997 | A |
5656036 | Palmaz | Aug 1997 | A |
5662712 | Pathak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690666 | Berenstein et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690842 | Panchinson | Nov 1997 | A |
5718711 | Berenstein et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725777 | Taylor | Mar 1998 | A |
5743905 | Eder et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746692 | Bacich et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746769 | Ton et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749915 | Slepian | May 1998 | A |
5755773 | Evans et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766160 | Samson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766203 | Imran et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772669 | Vrba | Jun 1998 | A |
5795288 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807236 | Bacich et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5843158 | Lenker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5876398 | Mulier et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885601 | Sokal | Mar 1999 | A |
5895749 | Alvarez | Apr 1999 | A |
5897551 | Everett et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5925059 | Palermo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935137 | Saadat | Aug 1999 | A |
5954715 | Harrington et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968052 | Sullivan, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976162 | Doan | Nov 1999 | A |
5979446 | Loy | Nov 1999 | A |
6019757 | Scheldrup | Feb 2000 | A |
6042590 | Sporri et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066139 | Ryan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068626 | Harrington et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080152 | Nardella et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096052 | Callister et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143007 | Mariant | Nov 2000 | A |
6145505 | Nikolchev | Nov 2000 | A |
6156742 | Mackenzie | Dec 2000 | A |
6164280 | Everett et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176240 | Nikolchev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178354 | Gibson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187027 | Mariant et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6270495 | Palermo | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286510 | Ray et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309384 | Harrington et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346102 | Harrington et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357443 | Loy | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371118 | Ray et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401719 | Farley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432116 | Callister et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6513528 | Burton et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526979 | Nikolchev et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6550480 | Feldman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6599299 | Schultz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6679266 | Nikolchev et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705323 | Nikolchev et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712810 | Harrington et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726682 | Harrington et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758831 | Ryan | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780182 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802825 | Ackerman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7073504 | Callister et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20010016738 | Harrington et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010041900 | Callister et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013589 | Callister et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020072744 | Harrington et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030015203 | Makower et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029457 | Callister et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051735 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030199913 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220636 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040172051 | Ravikumar | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202694 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204720 | Harrington et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220585 | Nikolchev | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255958 | Harrington et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033281 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045183 | Callister et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050192616 | Callister et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217680 | Callister et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3252078 | Jul 1979 | AU |
1047447 | Dec 1990 | CN |
1073088 | Jun 1993 | CN |
2404605 | Aug 1975 | DE |
2525650 | Dec 1976 | DE |
2537620 | Feb 1977 | DE |
2635863 | Feb 1977 | DE |
2803685 | Jan 1978 | DE |
2803685 | Aug 1979 | DE |
2913036 | Oct 1980 | DE |
0010812 | Oct 1979 | EP |
0010812 | May 1980 | EP |
105669 | Sep 1983 | EP |
183372 | Oct 1985 | EP |
241971 | Mar 1987 | EP |
421966 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0541258 | May 1993 | EP |
0686382 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0739608 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0891757 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1460077 | Dec 1976 | GB |
1530565 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2010728 | Jul 1979 | GB |
2038186 | Jul 1980 | GB |
2150439 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2211095 | Jun 1989 | GB |
1-113045 | May 1989 | JP |
5-269197 | Oct 1993 | JP |
7810696 | Apr 1980 | NL |
WO 8002369 | Nov 1980 | WO |
WO 8300011 | Jan 1983 | WO |
WO 8809648 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 9306884 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO9406503 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9407560 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9410936 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9411051 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9424944 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9426175 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9501123 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9525490 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9622122 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9640023 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9640024 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9640024 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9708997 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9712569 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9713451 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9727893 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9746175 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9749345 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9826737 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9831308 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9855046 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9915116 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0044323 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0137760 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 03088879 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004098469 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070044808 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10846047 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11497468 | US | |
Parent | 09591874 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 10846047 | US | |
Parent | 08474779 | Jun 1995 | US |
Child | 09591874 | US |