This application is based on and claims priority under 35 USC 119 from Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-052320 filed Mar. 17, 2017.
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a control apparatus, an image forming apparatus, and a non-transitory computer readable medium.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a control apparatus including: a storage unit that stores, for each of categories of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to a timing of a process, whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to the category; a reception unit that receives an instruction for a process; and a restriction unit that specifies a category to which the process indicated in the instruction received by the reception unit belongs, and that restricts, in a case where use of processes that belong to the specified category is not permitted for a user that provided the instruction in the storage unit, execution of the process according to the instruction.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail based on the following figures, wherein:
1. Exemplary Embodiment
1-1. Overall Configuration of Image Forming System
The terminal 3 illustrated in
The image forming apparatus 2 illustrated in
1-2. Configuration of Image Forming Apparatus
The controller 21 includes a central processing unit (CPU), a read only memory (ROM), and a random access memory (RAM). The CPU reads and executes computer programs (hereinafter referred to simply as “programs”) stored in the ROM or the storage unit 22 to control the various units of the image forming apparatus 2.
The storage unit 22 is a mass storage unit such as a hard disk drive, and stores the various programs to be read into the CPU of the controller 21. The storage unit 22 may store image data that are sent from the terminal 3 and that indicate an image.
The communication unit 23 is a communication line connected to the server device 1 through a wire or wirelessly. The communication unit 23 may have a function of connecting to the communication line 4.
The image forming unit 25 forms a designated image on a medium through electrophotography or the like. The image forming unit 25 includes an image holding member such as a photosensitive drum, a charger, an exposure device, a developer, a transfer machine, a fixer, and so forth. The image holding member holds a latent image when the surface thereof is irradiated with light to cause a potential difference. The charger charges the surface of the image holding member. The exposure device irradiates the image holding member with light. The developer supplies the surface on which the latent image is held with a developer such as a toner to which a charge has been applied. The transfer machine transfers an image formed using the developer from the image holding member to the medium. The fixer applies heat to the medium to fix the image which has been transferred onto the medium.
1-3. Configuration of Server Device
The controller 11 includes a CPU, a ROM, and a RAM. The CPU reads and executes programs stored in the ROM or the storage unit 12 to control the various units of the server device 1.
The communication unit 13 is a communication line connected to the image forming apparatus 2 through a wire or wirelessly. The communication unit 13 is connected to the communication line 4 through a wire or wirelessly. The communication unit 13 may be connected to the image forming device 2 via the communication line 4.
The storage unit 12 is a mass storage unit such as a hard disk drive, and stores the various programs to be read into the CPU of the controller 11. The storage unit 12 also stores a type table 120 and a permission table 121.
The type table 120 stores the types (hereinafter referred to also as “categories”) of processes to be executed by the image forming apparatus 2 in correlation with the content of the processes. The types of processes are classified in accordance with at least a condition related to the timing of image formation.
The permission table 121 stores the possibility of use by each user for each of the types of processes classified in accordance with the condition related to the timing of image formation. For example, the permission table 121 indicates, for each user, identification information on processes that belong to types that the user is permitted to use. Thus, the storage unit 12 which stores the permission table 121 is an example of a storage unit that stores, for each of categories of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to the timing of image formation, whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to the category.
Image formation is executed at the timing decided in accordance with an instruction after image data are stored (or accumulated) in the storage unit 22 of the image forming apparatus 2, for example. For example, if the timing of image formation is “instantly”, the image forming apparatus 2 executes image formation with the server device 1 or the image forming apparatus 2 receiving an instruction from the terminal 3 as an impetus, for example. In this case, “instantly” means the timing of image formation that matches the timing of reception of an instruction. If the timing of image formation is “when confirmed”, the image forming apparatus 2 executes image formation after the user has performed an operation to confirm that “an image formation process may be executed” using the operation unit of the server device 1 or the image forming apparatus 2. If the timing of image formation is “when designated”, the image forming apparatus 2 executes image formation when a designated time included in an instruction has come, for example.
If the “folder” is “personal”, the image data are to be accumulated in a folder assigned to the user as an individual. If the “folder” is “shared”, the image data are to be accumulated in a folder shared by plural users. If the “folder” is “purpose-specific”, the image data are to be accumulated in a folder assigned to each purpose of use.
By combining such conditions, the types of processes include: a type in which image formation is restricted using a password after accumulation of image data; a type in which image formation is performed without requesting a password after accumulation; a type in which image data are not deleted after image formation; a type in which image formation is executed at a designated time; and so forth. The types of processes also include: a type in which image formation is performed for only one copy and, after confirmation, image formation is performed for the remaining copies to prepare plural copies of a document; a type in which image formation is executed when a facsimile or a mail is received using a data accumulation region of facsimile software or mail software; and so forth.
The “various conditions related to image formation” indicated in the type table 120 are not limited to those discussed above. For example, in the case where information (referred to as “instruction information”) related to instructions for image formation performed using image data is accumulated, together with the image data, as a queue in the storage unit 12 of the server device 1, for example, the type table 120 may store whether or not the user has the “retrieval” authority to retrieve and view any piece of the instruction information discussed above from the queue and provide an instruction (final instruction).
The retrieval authority may be provided to the users unconditionally, may be provided to only authenticated users, or may be provided when the user has provided required information. The information required by the image forming apparatus 2 may be a personal identification number (PIN) code determined in advance or issued when the image forming apparatus 2 or the like received an instruction (first instruction) or the like, a password, or the like, for example.
The controller 11 of the server device 1 references the type table 120 to specify, from the content of an instruction from the user received by the communication unit 13, the type of a process that matches a condition for image formation included in the instruction.
The permission table 121 illustrated in
1-4. Configuration of Terminal
The controller 31 includes a CPU, a ROM, and a RAM. The CPU reads and executes programs stored in the ROM or the storage unit 32 to control the various units of the terminal 3.
The communication unit 33 is a communication circuit connected to the communication line 4 via a wireless access point using a method that conforms to IEEE 802.11, for example. The communication unit 33 may be connected to the communication line 4 through a wire, rather than wirelessly. The terminal 3 exchanges information with the image forming apparatus 2 using the communication unit 33 via the communication line 4 and the server device 1.
The operation unit 35 includes operators such as operation buttons for inputting various instructions, and receives an operation by the user and supplies the controller 31 with a signal that matches the content of the operation. The operation unit 35 may include a touch screen that detects an operating body such as a finger of the user or a stylus pen.
The display unit 34 includes a liquid crystal display, and displays an image under control by the controller 31. A transparent touch screen of the operation unit 35 may be disposed as superposed on the liquid crystal display of the display unit 34.
1-5. Functional Configuration of Server Device
The reception unit 111 receives an instruction for image formation from the communication unit 13, for example. The instruction for image formation has been delivered from the terminal 3 to the communication unit 13 via the communication line 4, for example. When the instruction is received, the reception unit 111 receives identification information on a user that provided the instruction, and the content of the instruction such as image data that indicate an image to be formed and setting for forming the image, for example. The identification information on a user may be a user ID etc. of a user that uses the terminal 3.
The specifying unit 112 specifies the user who provided the instruction received by the reception unit 111 in accordance with the identification information on the user included in the instruction. In the case where the received instruction includes authentication information such as a password that authenticates the user, the specifying unit 112 may authenticate the user on the basis of a set of the identification information on the user and the authentication information. Alternatively, the specifying unit 112 may send the set to an external authentication device via the communication unit 13 to cause the authentication device to perform authentication. The user may be specified by the reception unit 111. In this case, the specifying unit 112 may not be provided.
The specifying unit 112 may extract a condition for image formation from the content of an instruction received by the reception unit 111, and specify the type of a process indicated in the instruction on the basis of the type table 120. In the case where the content of the instruction includes identification information for identification of the type of the process such as a type name, the specifying unit 112 may specify the type of the process on the basis of the identification information. In this case, the storage unit 12 may not store the type table 120.
The restriction unit 113 determines whether or not use of processes that belong to the type specified from the content of the instruction received by the reception unit 111 is permitted for the user who provided the instruction in the permission table 121 of the storage unit 12. In the case where use of processes that belong to the type is not permitted for the user who provided the instruction, the restriction unit 113 restricts the image forming apparatus 2, e.g. by sending a control signal via the communication unit 13, such that the image forming apparatus 2 does not execute image formation according to the instruction.
The presentation unit 114 presents, to the user of the terminal 3, a correction for changing a process that belongs to the type specified from the content of the instruction received by the reception unit 111 to a process that belongs to a different type permitted for the user in the permission table 121 of the storage unit 12 in the case where the restriction unit 113 restricts the image forming apparatus 2.
In the case where use of processes that belong to the type specified from the content of the instruction received by the reception unit 111 is not permitted for the user who provided the instruction in the permission table 121 of the storage unit 12, the controller 11 may not retrieve and present to the user a process that belongs to a different type permitted for the user. That is, the controller 11 may not function as the presentation unit 114.
The presentation unit 114 may present the correction discussed above to the user of the terminal 3 also in the case where the image formation according to the instruction may not be executed because of a trouble etc. caused in the image forming apparatus 2. Also in this case, a process that belongs to a type permitted for the user is designated by providing an instruction again in accordance with the presented correction, and therefore execution of image formation is not restricted.
In the case where the image forming apparatus 2 is restricted, the restriction unit 113 may make a correction for changing a process that belongs to the type specified from the content of the instruction received by the reception unit 111 to a process that belongs to a different type permitted for the user in the permission table 121 of the storage unit 12, and control the image forming apparatus 2 so as to execute image formation in accordance with the corrected instruction. In this case, the presentation unit 114 may present the content of the correction to the terminal 3 after image formation is executed, or the presentation unit 114 may not be provided.
1-6. Operation of Server Device
The controller 11 specifies the type of a process indicated in the received instruction from the content of the instruction (step S103). The controller 11 determines, on the basis of identification information on the specified user and identification information (type name) on the type specified from the content of the received instruction, whether or not use of processes that belong to the type is permitted for the user (step S104).
In the case where it is determined that use of processes of the type specified from the content of the received instruction is permitted for the user who provided the instruction (step S104: YES), the controller 11 executes image formation indicated in the instruction (step S105). In step S105, image formation is executed at a timing based on the type of a process specified in step S103. For example, in the case where the type discussed above requests the user to perform an operation for confirmation immediately before image formation, the controller 11 requests the user to perform an operation for confirmation in step S105.
In the case where it is determined that use of the process discussed above is not permitted for the user (step S104: NO), the controller 11 transmits, to the terminal 3, a signal indicating that the process of the image formation according to the instruction is suspended (step S106). When the signal is received, the terminal 3 informs the user that the process of the image formation is suspended through display on the display unit 34, for example.
In the case where the process of the image formation according to the instruction has been suspended, the controller 11 determines whether or not there is any process of a type that is different from the type specified by the instruction and that the user discussed above is permitted to use in the permission table 121 stored in the storage unit 12. In the case where there is any such process, the controller 11 sends a control signal to the terminal 3 so as to present a correction for changing a process according to the instruction and that is not permitted for the user to a process permitted for the user (step S107).
Through the operation described above, the server device 1 of the image forming system 9 restricts processes to be used by the user for each of the categories of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to the timing of image formation.
2. Modifications
While the exemplary embodiment has been described above, the exemplary embodiment may be modified as described below. The following modifications may be combined with each other.
2-1. Modification 1
In the exemplary embodiment discussed above, the storage unit 12 stores the permission table 121 which indicates, for each of types of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to the timing of image formation, whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to the type. However, the storage unit 12 may store the permission table 121 which stores, for each of plural types, the number of times that each user may use processes that belong to the type. The storage unit 12 which stores the permission table 121 is an example of a storage unit that stores, for each of processes that belong to the plural types, the number of times that each user may use the process.
The permission table 121 may indicate the number of times that processes may be used in a determined period for each type, or may indicate the number of times that processes may be used at the present moment for each type. For example, the controller 11 may rewrite the number of times of use when image formation has been executed, by subtracting the number of times that processes have been used from the number of times indicated in correlation with the type of processes that match a condition related to the timing of image formation in the permission table 121.
2-2. Modification 2
The processes that belong to the types permitted for the users may differ depending on the time zone. In this case, the permission table 121 may indicate identification information on the types of processes permitted for the users for each time zone in correlation with user names for identification of the users.
The time zones indicated in the permission table 121 may be different among the users. The timing when the restriction unit 113 references the permission table 121 may be the time point when image formation is executed or the time point when an instruction for image formation has been received.
2-3. Modification 3
In the exemplary embodiment discussed above, the permission table 121 indicates whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to each type. However, the permission table 121 may indicate whether or not it is possible for each group to which the users belong to use processes that belong to each type.
In this case, in the case where use of processes that belong to the type specified from the content of the received instruction is not permitted for a group to which the user who provided the instruction belongs in the permission table 121, the restriction unit 113 may restrict the image forming apparatus 2 so as not to execute image formation according to the instruction.
In addition to indicating whether or not it is possible for each group to use processes that belong to a type, the permission table 121 may indicate whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to the type. In the case where there is a contradiction between the possibility determined for a certain user to use processes that belong to a type and the possibility determined for a group to which the user belongs to use processes that belong to the type, one of the two possibilities may be determined using such information by a method determined in advance. One such method may be determined for the permission table 121, or one such method may be determined for each of the groups or the users. Examples of the method include giving priority to the indications for the groups, giving priority to the indications for the users, computing the logical sum thereof, computing the logical product thereof, and so forth.
2-4. Modification 4
The reception unit 111 may receive a correction for a received instruction in the case where the restriction unit 113 has restricted the image forming apparatus 2. In this configuration, when the user makes a correction for changing a process that belongs to the type specified from a restricted instruction to a process that belongs to a type permitted for the user, the image forming apparatus 2 executes image formation in accordance with the corrected instruction.
The reception unit 111 may receive a correction for the possibility of use stored in the storage unit 12 in the case where the restriction unit 113 has restricted the image forming apparatus 2. In this case, the storage unit 12 may correct the possibility of use in the case where a correction for the possibility of use has been received from the reception unit 111.
2-5. Modification 5
In the exemplary embodiment discussed above, the permission table 121 indicates names (type names) of the types to which processes that the users are permitted to use belong in correlation with names (user names) of the users. However, the permission table 121 may indicate type names that indicate the types of processes that the users are prohibited from using. In short, the possibility for each user to use processes that belong to a category may be determined on the basis of the permission table 121 for each of the categories of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to the timing of image formation.
2-6. Modification 6
In the exemplary embodiment discussed above, the server device 1 and the image forming apparatus 2 are separate from each other. However, the image forming apparatus 2 may have the function of the server device 1. In this case, the controller 21 and the storage unit 22 of the image forming apparatus 2 may function as a control apparatus that controls the image forming apparatus 2.
2-7. Modification 7
The programs executed by the controller 11 of the server device 1 may be provided as stored in a computer-readable recording medium such as a magnetic recording medium such as a magnetic tape and a magnetic disk, an optical recording medium such as an optical disc, a magneto-optical recording medium, and a semiconductor memory. Alternatively, the programs may be downloaded by way of a communication line such as the Internet. A variety of devices, besides the CPU, may be used as a controller exemplified by the controller 11 discussed above. For example, a dedicated processor etc. may be used.
2-8. Modification 8
In the exemplary embodiment discussed above, the storage unit 12 preliminarily stores, for each of plural types of processes, whether or not it is possible for each actual user to use processes that belong to the type. However, the storage unit 12 may store the possibility of such use for each mission that the user is scheduled to assume.
The controller 11 may receive an instruction for changing the third permission table 1213 from an external device via the communication unit 13. In this case, for example, the user may operate the operation unit 35 of the terminal 3 to send the instruction to the server device 1, and the controller 11 of the server device 1 may receive the instruction. In the case where the instruction is for preparing a new mission, the controller 11 may prepare a collection of type names to be correlated with the new mission on the basis of a collection of type names that have already been indicated in correlation with a mission in the third permission table 1213.
The missions may be assigned to groups to which the users belong, rather than being assigned to the users.
That is, the storage unit 12 which stores the third permission table 1213 is an example of a third storage unit that stores plural missions, for which it is determined, for each of categories of processes, whether or not it is possible to use processes that belong to the category, and the storage unit 12 which stores the fourth permission table 1214 is an example of a fourth storage unit that stores the missions as assigned to the users or groups to which the users belong.
In this case, in the case where use of processes that belong to the type specified from the content of a received instruction is not permitted for a mission assigned to the user who provided the instruction in the permission table 121 and hence not permitted for the user, the restriction unit 113 may restrict the image forming apparatus 2 so as not to execute image formation according to the instruction.
2-9. Modification 9
In Modification 8 discussed above, one mission name is assigned to a user name or group name in the fourth permission table 1214. However, plural mission names may be assigned to one user name or group name.
Specifically, in the case where a “circular mark” is provided in the field corresponding to a combination of a user name and a mission name in the fourth permission table 1214 of
For example, while missions identified with mission names “RA”, “RB”, “RC”, and “RD” are assigned to a user with a user name “UA”, a mission identified with a mission name “RE” is not assigned to the user.
In the fourth permission table 1214, authority computation setting is determined for each user name. The authority computation setting is indicated as “product” or “sum”.
In the case where the authority computation setting is indicated as “product”, the possibility of use determined for plural missions assigned to a user is evaluated using the logical product. That is, use of processes that belong to a type prohibited for a mission, of the plural missions assigned to the user, is prohibited for the user even if use of such a process is permitted for the other missions. That is, setting in which the authority computation setting is indicated as “product” is first setting in which, in the case where plural missions are assigned to a user, the image forming apparatus is restricted when use of processes that belong to a type is not permitted for one or more of the plural missions. When the authority computation setting is indicated as “product”, there is generally a less chance of a process being permitted.
In the case where the authority computation setting is indicated as “sum”, meanwhile, the possibility of use determined for plural missions assigned to a user is evaluated using the logical sum. That is, use of processes that belong to a type permitted for a mission, of the plural missions assigned to the user, is permitted for the user even if use of such a process is prohibited for the other missions. That is, setting in which the authority computation setting is indicated as “sum” is second setting in which, in the case where plural missions are assigned to a user, the image forming apparatus is restricted only when use of processes that belong to a type is not permitted for any of the missions. When the authority computation setting is indicated as “sum”, there is generally a better chance of a process being permitted.
That is, the storage unit 12 which stores the fourth permission table 1214 according to Modification 9 is an example of a storage unit that stores one of the first setting in which, in the case where plural missions are assigned to a user or a group, the image forming apparatus is restricted when use of processes that belong to a type is not permitted for one or more of the missions and the second setting in which the image forming apparatus is restricted only when use of processes that belong to a type is not permitted for any of the missions.
In this case, the restriction unit may restrict the image forming apparatus 2 by applying the authority computation setting stored in the fourth permission table 1214 in the case where plural missions are assigned to a user that provided a received instruction or a group to which the user belongs in the fourth permission table 1214.
2-10. Modification 10
In Modification 9 discussed above, the authority computation setting is determined for each user name in the fourth permission table 1214. However, the authority computation setting may be changed by the user. For example, the reception unit 111 which is implemented by the controller 11 may receive an instruction for changing the authority computation setting stored in the fourth permission table 1214. In this case, the storage unit 12 may change the authority computation setting in accordance with an instruction for changing the authority computation setting when the instruction is received.
2-11. Modification 11
The third permission table 1213 discussed above indicates, for each of plural missions, the type name of a type to which processes permitted to be used in the mission belong. However, the third permission table 1213 may indicate the number of times of use, for example, for each mission for each of types to which processes permitted to be used in the mission belong. The processes that belong to the types permitted for the missions may differ depending on the time zone.
The mission assigned to the user may differ depending on the time zone. In this case, the fourth permission table 1214 may indicate identification information (mission name) on the mission assigned to the user for each time zone in correlation with a user name for identification of the user.
The mission assigned to the user may differ depending on the operating state of the image forming apparatus 2, rather than the time zone discussed above.
2-12. Modification 12
The server device 1 or the image forming apparatus 2 may receive, from the terminal 3, a “group of serial instructions” by determining the order of plural instructions for image formation. In this case, the plural instructions included in one group of instructions may include conditions for image formation that are different from each other.
On the other hand, instructions composed of plural instructions, of the instructions included in the list L0, are correlated with plural instructions indicated under one user name by a set of image data and a type name of an instruction for forming an image using the image data with the order of execution assigned to each of the instructions as with a group of instructions L3 indicated in
The authority of a user to accumulate instruction information in the storage unit 12 and the authority of the user to confirm or retrieve the accumulated instruction information may be different from each other. For example, while a certain user may accumulate instruction information on processes of a type (PIN code type) that may be retrieved by entering a PIN code and instruction information on processes of a type (password type) that may be retrieved by entering a password, the user may be given the authority to retrieve only the processes of the PIN code type.
In the case where the authority permitted for a certain user is varied in accordance with the time zone, the types of processes may be different between instruction information that the user is permitted to accumulate during accumulation and instruction information that the user is permitted to retrieve during retrieval.
In the case where instruction information of the PIN code type and instruction information of the password type are stored in a common storage region during accumulation, the instruction information of the PIN code type and the instruction information of the password type are present in a mixed manner in the storage region. In this state, in the case where the user selects all of the plural pieces of instruction information stored as a group of serial instructions in the common storage region and provides an instruction (final instruction) for execution of such pieces of instruction information, the server device 1 confirms the authority for retrieval sequentially from the first piece of instruction information, and suspends execution of an instruction indicated in a piece of instruction information, for which an authority violation has been detected. In this event, the server device 1 may suspend execution of instructions indicated in pieces of instruction information that follow the piece of instruction information which indicates the suspended instruction, or may not confirm the authority for retrieval for such pieces of instruction information.
For example, in the case where an instruction with a type name “JE” is of the “PIN code type” discussed above and an instruction with a type name “JF” is of the “password type” discussed above, the order of the types of the instructions accumulated as indicated in
The retrieval authority may be confirmed initially collectively for all the group of serial instructions.
2-13. Modification 13
In Modification 12 discussed above, the server device 1 sequentially confirms the retrieval authority for all the instructions included in the group of serial instructions and, when an instruction for which the retrieval authority is not provided is detected, suspends execution of the instruction and all the subsequent instructions. However, the server device 1 may suspend execution of an instruction for which the retrieval authority is provided and all the subsequent instructions in the case where an authority violation has been detected during execution of such an instruction. The timing to confirm the authority to execute such instructions may be at the time of execution thereof, which is later than the time of retrieval thereof.
The child instructions are executed in accordance with the assigned orders. When the child instructions are to be executed, the server device 1 confirms the authority to execute the processes themselves indicated in the instructions. For example, in the example illustrated in
In the case where the type name “JE” indicates processes for forming a black-and-white image, the type name “JF” indicates processes for forming a color image, and the user is not given the authority to form a color image, the server device 1 detects an authority violation for the child instruction “011-3” at time t13. In this event, the server device 1 suspends execution of the child instruction “011-3”, and also suspends execution of the following child instruction “011-4”. In this case, further, the server device 1 may determine to save confirming the authority to execute the content of the child instruction “011-4” before time t14. The server device 1 may suspend execution of the parent instruction “011” at the timing when an authority violation for the child instruction “011-3” has been detected at time t13.
In the case where both the retrieval authority and the authority to execute identification information for which the retrieval authority is provided are to be determined as in this modification, the retrieval authority for the second instruction information may be checked at the same time as the retrieval authority for the first instruction information is being checked because of the resource of the image forming apparatus 2. However, the authority to execute instruction information for which the retrieval authority is provided, e.g. to print a document, may not be exercised by the image forming unit 25 concurrently for two pieces of instruction information.
Specifically, even if the retrieval authority for the second instruction information has been checked when the retrieval authority for the first instruction information has been checked and the authority to execute printing according to the instruction information is being checked, the authority to execute printing according to the second instruction information is not checked. Even in such a case, the child instruction “011-3” and the subsequent instructions are not output by canceling the parent instruction when an authority violation for execution of printing is detected.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiment of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with the various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2017-052320 | Mar 2017 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8411294 | Inoue | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8621469 | Sakai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9436423 | Doui | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20060026434 | Yoshida | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070226808 | Uchikawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080079990 | Iida | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130026 | Mizuno | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134186 | Sakai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090268225 | Sugiyama | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276846 | Kotaka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100014110 | Munetomo | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20120075657 | Yamamoto | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140215576 | Sugiyama | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140372514 | Doui | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H11-134136 | May 1999 | JP |
2007-257529 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2014-027357 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014-149562 | Aug 2014 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180270212 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |