The present invention relates to the technical field of entrance systems having one or more movable door members. More specifically, the present invention relates to a control arrangement for an entrance system having one or more movable door members and an automatic door operator for causing movements of the one or more movable door members between closed and open positions. The present invention also relates to an entrance system comprising such a control arrangement, and to a method of operating such an entrance system.
Entrance systems having automatic door operators are frequently used for providing automatic opening and closing of one or more movable door members in order to facilitate entrance and exit to buildings, rooms and other areas. The door members may for instance be swing doors, sliding door or revolving doors.
Since entrance systems having automatic door operators are typically used in public areas, user convenience is of course important. The entrance systems need to remain long-term operational without malfunctions even during periods of heavy traffic by persons passing through the entrance systems. At the same time, safety is crucial in order to avoid hazardous situations where a present, approaching or departing person or object (including but not limited to animals or articles brought by the person) may be hit or jammed by any of the movable door members.
The present inventor has realized that there is room for improvements in this field.
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide one or more improvements in the field of entrance systems having automatic door operators for causing movements of one or more movable door members between closed and open positions.
The present inventor has realized, after insightful consideration, that in order to satisfy the relevant requirements in terms of user convenience, it will be necessary to use a plurality of sensors for monitoring different zones at the entrance system for presence or activity of a person or object. The present inventor has realized that while this implies a penalty in electric power consumption, the situation can be improved by appropriately configuring the entrance system such that the different sensors are selectively controlled to be active or inactive depending on the operational state of the entrance system.
Accordingly, a first aspect of the present invention is a control arrangement for an entrance system having one or more movable door members and an automatic door operator for causing movements of the one or more movable door members between closed and open positions. The control arrangement comprises a controller and a plurality of sensors. Each sensor is connected to the controller and is configured to monitor a respective zone at the entrance system for presence or activity of a person or object. Moreover, each sensor has an active mode and an inactive mode, wherein the sensor consumes no electric power in the inactive mode or substantially less electric power in the inactive mode than in the active mode.
The controller is configured to determine a current operational state of the entrance system among a plurality of possible operational states, and selectively cause at least one of the sensors to be in its active mode or in its inactive mode depending on the determined current operational state of the entrance system.
The provision of such a control arrangement will solve or at least mitigate one or more of the problems or drawbacks identified in the above, as will be clear from the following detailed description section and the drawings.
A second aspect of the present invention is an entrance system comprising one or more movable door members, an automatic door operator for causing movements of the one or more movable door members between closed and open positions, and a control arrangement according to the first aspect of the present invention.
A third aspect of the present invention is a method of operating an entrance system having one or more movable door members and an automatic door operator for causing movements of the one or more movable door members between closed and open positions. The method comprises providing a plurality of sensors, each sensor being configured to monitor a respective zone at the entrance system for presence or activity of a person or object. The method also comprises determining a current operational state of the entrance system among a plurality of possible operational states. The method then comprises selectively causing at least one of the sensors to be in an active mode or in an inactive mode depending on the determined current operational state of the entrance system, wherein the sensor consumes no electric power in the inactive mode or substantially less electric power in the inactive mode than in the active mode.
Embodiments of the invention are defined by the appended dependent claims and are further explained in the detailed description section as well as in the drawings.
It should be emphasized that the term “comprises/comprising” when used in this specification is taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, or components, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components, or groups thereof. All terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to “a/an/the [element, device, component, means, step, etc]” are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of the element, device, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.
Objects, features and advantages of embodiments of the invention will appear from the following detailed description, reference being made to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the particular embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements.
Pursuant to the invention, a control arrangement 20 is provided for the entrance system 10. The control arrangement 20 comprises a controller 32, which may be part of the automatic door operator 30 as seen in the embodiment of
Pursuant to the invention, each sensor S1 . . . Sn has an active mode and an inactive mode, wherein the sensor consumes some electric power in the active mode but no electric power in the inactive mode, or at least substantially less electric power in the inactive mode than in the active mode. The active mode may be an operating mode, i.e. a mode where the sensor is (fully) operational in terms of its sensing functionality and hence capable of performing its monitoring of the zone in question. In contrast, the inactive mode may be an idle mode, standby mode, disconnected more or shut-off mode, i.e. a mode where the sensor is not operational in terms of its sensing functionality and hence incapable of performing its monitoring of the zone in question.
The controller 32 is configured to determine a current operational state of the entrance system 10 among a plurality of possible operational states. This determination may be made on a regular basis, for instance based on a schedule. Alternatively or additionally, this determination may be occasioned by the controller 32 itself when switching states in the internal program run by the controller as being part of, for instance, the functionality performed by the automatic door operator 30.
The controller 32 is moreover configured to selectively cause at least one of the sensors S1 . . . Sn to be in its active mode or in its inactive mode depending on the determined current operational state of the entrance system 10. Examples of such selective causing of mode switches for the different sensors S1 . . . Sn will be given later when describing the three embodiments of
The embodiment of the automatic door operator 30 shown in
In addition to the aforementioned controller 32, the automatic door operator 30 comprises a motor 34, typically an electrical motor, being connected to an internal transmission or gearbox 35. An output shaft of the transmission 35 rotates upon activation of the motor 34 and is connected to the external transmission mechanism 40. The external transmission mechanism translates the motion of the output shaft of the transmission 35 into an opening or a closing motion of one or more of the door members D1 . . . Dm with respect to the frame or support structure.
The controller 32 is configured for performing different functions of the automatic door operator 30 in the different operational states of the entrance system 10, using inter alia sensor input data from the plurality of sensors S1 . . . Sn. Hence, the outputs of the plurality of sensors S1 . . . Sn are connected to data inputs of the controller 32. At least some of the different functions performable by the controller 32 have the purpose of causing desired movements of the door members D1 . . . Dm. To this end, the controller 32 has at least one control output connected to the motor 34 for controlling the actuation thereof.
The controller 32 may be implemented in any known controller technology, including but not limited to microcontroller, processor (e.g. PLC, CPU, DSP), FPGA, ASIC or any other suitable digital and/or analog circuitry capable of performing the intended functionality.
The controller 32 also has an associated memory 33. The memory 33 may be implemented in any known memory technology, including but not limited to E(E)PROM, S(D)RAM or flash memory. In some embodiments, the memory 33 may be integrated with or internal to the controller 32. The memory 33 may store program instruction for execution by the controller 32, as well as temporary and permanent data used by the controller 32.
Before turning to a detailed description of the three different embodiments, reference is made to
Hence, in a first step 310, the plurality of sensors S1 . . . Sn are provided. As mentioned above, each sensor is configured to monitor a respective zone Z1 . . . Zn at the entrance system 10 for presence or activity of a person or object.
Then, in a second step 320, a current operational state of the entrance system 10 is determined among a plurality of possible operational states.
A third step 330 involves selectively causing at least one of the sensors S1 . . . Sn to be in an active mode or in an inactive mode depending on the determined current operational state of the entrance system 10, wherein the sensor consumes no electric power in the inactive mode or substantially less electric power in the inactive mode than in the active mode.
As already touched upon above and as is seen in
Turning now to
The sliding door system 410 comprises a plurality of sensors, each monitoring a respective zone Z1-Z6. The sensors themselves are not shown in
A first sensor S1 is mounted at a lateral position to the far left in
A second sensor S2 is mounted at a lateral position to the far right in
A third sensor S3 is mounted at a first central position in
A fourth sensor S4 is mounted at a second central position in
The side presence sensors S1 and S2 and door presence sensors S3 and S4 may for instance be active IR (infrared) sensors.
A fifth sensor S5 is mounted at an inner central position in
A sixth sensor S6 is mounted at an outer central position in
The inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 may for instance be radar (microwave) sensors.
Pursuant to the inventive aspects previously described, a control arrangement is provided for the sliding door system 410 (cf control arrangement 20 and entrance system 10 in
As can be seen in the control data 480, only the inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 will be active when the sliding door system 410 is in its closed state. Since the sliding doors D1 and D2 are closed, there will be no risk of persons or objects being hit by or jammed between them, and accordingly the controller puts the side presence sensors S1 and S2 and the door presence sensors S3 and S4 in their inactive mode in the closed state of the sliding door system 410. This will save power.
The similar situation prevails when the sliding door system 410 is in its open state; only the inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 will be active. Since the sliding doors D1 and D2 are not moving, the side presence sensors S1 and S2 and the door presence sensors S3 and S4 can be held in their inactive mode in the open state of the sliding door system 410; again this will preserve power.
The situation is different when the sliding doors D1 and D2 are moving, i.e. when the sliding door system 410 is in its opening state or its closing state. Here, different ones among the sensors S1-S6 will be kept active and inactive, respectively, as defined by the control data 480.
In the opening state, the inner activity sensor S5, the outer activity sensor S6 as well as the door presence sensors S3 and S4 can all be kept inactive. This is so since the sliding doors D1 and D2 are already opening; hence there is no need for the inner activity sensor S5 or outer activity sensor S6 during the opening state of the sliding door system 410. Also, since the sliding doors D1 and D2 are opening, i.e. moving away from each other, there is no risk for a hitting or jamming accident in the central zones Z3 and Z4; hence there is no need for the door presence sensors S3 and S4 during the opening state of the sliding door system 410. Hence, power can be preserved by only keeping the side presence sensors S1 and S2 active for monitoring the lateral zones Z1 and Z2.
In the closing state, the inner activity sensor S5, the outer activity sensor S6 as well as the door presence sensors S3 and S4 will all have to be active, since the zones Z5, Z6, Z3 and Z4 will have to be monitored. On the other hand, since the sliding doors D1 and D2 are moving towards each other they are also moving away from the lateral zones Z1 and Z2; hence these zones do not need monitoring during the closing state of the sliding door system 410, and the side presence sensors S1 and S2 may be kept inactive to save power.
A second embodiment of an entrance system in the form of a swing door system 510 is shown in a schematic top view in
The swing door system 510 comprises a plurality of sensors, each monitoring a respective zone Z1-Z4. The sensors themselves are not shown in
A first sensor S1 is mounted at a first central position in
A second sensor S2 is mounted at a second central position in
The door presence sensors S1 and S2 may for instance be active IR (infrared) sensors.
A third sensor S3 is mounted at an inner central position in
A fourth sensor S4 is mounted at an outer central position in
The inner activity sensor S3 and the outer activity sensor S4 may for instance be radar (microwave) sensors.
Pursuant to the inventive aspects previously described and similar to the first embodiment in
As can be seen in the control data 580, only the inner activity sensor S3 and the outer activity sensor S4 will be active when the swing door system 510 is in its closed state. Since the swing door D1 is closed, there will be no risk of persons or objects being hit by or jammed by it, and accordingly the controller puts the door presence sensors S1 and S2 in their inactive mode in the closed state of the swing door system 510. This will save power.
The similar situation prevails when the swing door system 510 is in its open state; only the inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 will be active. Since the swing door D1 is not moving, the door presence sensors S1 and S2 can be held in their inactive mode in the open state of the swing door system 510; again this will preserve power.
The situation is different when the swing door D1 is moving, i.e. when the swing door system 510 is in its opening state or its closing state. Here, different ones among the sensors S1-S4 will be kept active and inactive, respectively, as defined by the control data 580.
In the opening state, the inner activity sensor S3, the outer activity sensor S4 as well as the door presence sensor S2 can all be kept inactive. This is so since the swing door D1 is already opening, there is no risk for a hitting or jamming accident in the central zone Z2; hence there is no need for the door presence sensors S1 and S2 during the opening state of the swing door system 510. Hence, power can be preserved by only keeping three of the sensors S1-S4 inactive during the opening state of the swing door system 510, and only keeping sensor S1 active to monitor zone Z1.
In the closing state, the inner activity sensor S3, the outer activity sensor S4 as well as at least the door presence sensor S2 will all have to be active, since the zones Z3, Z4 and Z1 will have to be monitored. Sensor S1 may be kept inactive to save power.
A third embodiment of an entrance system in the form of a revolving door system 610 is shown in a schematic top view in
The revolving door system 610 comprises a plurality of sensors, each monitoring a respective zone Z1-Z8. The sensors themselves are not shown in
First to fourth sensors S1-S4 are mounted at respective first to fourth central positions in
The door presence sensors S1-S4 may for instance be active IR (infrared) sensors.
A fifth sensor S5 is mounted at an inner non-central position in
A sixth sensor S6 is mounted at an outer non-central position in
The inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 may for instance be radar (microwave) sensors.
Seventh and eighth sensors S7 and S8 are mounted near the ends of the first or second curved wall portions 662 and 666 to monitor zones Z7 and Z8. The seventh and eighth sensors S7 and S8 are vertical presence sensors. The provision of these sensors S7 and S8 will help avoiding a risk that the person or object will be jammed between the approaching side of the respective revolving door D1-D4 and an end portion of the first or second curved wall portions 662 and 666 during the start rotation state and the rotation state of the revolving door system 610. When any of the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 detects such a situation, it will trigger abort and possibly reversal of the ongoing rotational movement 650 of the revolving doors D1-D4.
The vertical presence sensors S7-S8 may for instance be active IR (infrared) sensors.
Pursuant to the inventive aspects previously described and similar to the first and second embodiments in
As can be seen in the control data 680, only the inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6 will be active when the revolving door system 610 is in its no rotation state. Since the revolving doors D1-D4 are not moving, there will be no risk of persons or objects being hit or jammed by them, and accordingly the controller puts the door presence sensors S1-S4 as well as the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 in their inactive mode in the no rotation state of the revolving door system 610. This will save power.
The opposite situation applies during the start rotation state and the rotation state of the revolving door system 610. Here, since the revolving doors D1-D4 are already moving, there is no need to use the inner activity sensor S5 and the outer activity sensor S6; hence they will be kept in their inactive mode to preserve power. The door presence sensors S1-S4 will need to monitor their zones Z1-Z4 and are hence in their active mode.
Likewise, the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 will be in their active mode in the start rotation state and the rotation state of the revolving door system 610. A possible further power preservation in however possible by configuring the controller to intermittently switch the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 on and off during parts of the start rotation state and rotation state of the revolving door system 610 (as well as in the end rotation state of the revolving door system 610). When the revolving doors D1-D4 are near the first and second curved wall portions 662 and 666, the controller may switch the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 on, whereas when the revolving doors D1-D4 are remote from the first and second curved wall portions 662 and 666, the controller may switch the vertical presence sensors S7-S8 off.
Only in the end rotation state of the revolving door system 610, all sensors S1-S8 will have to be in their active mode. Hence, in three out of four operational states of the revolving door system 610, selected ones of the sensors S1-S8 will be in their inactive state to preserve power. It is to be noticed that the rotation and no rotation states typically have much longer durations than the intermittent start rotation and end rotation states; hence substantial power savings may be available by keeping selected ones of the sensors S1-S8 inactive during these longer durations.
The entrance system 10, 410, 510, 610 in any of the embodiments described above may have different main operating modes (operational modes), wherein further power may be saved. The operating modes represent a higher control layer of the entrance system; each operating mode may have a single operational state or a plurality of operational states. A human operator may set the current operating mode on an operator panel which is provided at the entrance system. Alternatively, a human operator may set the current operating mode wirelessly by using a portable computer, tablet computer or smartphone to communicate with the controller over a suitable wireless interface, or remotely by using a computer to communicate with the controller over a data network. Other ways of setting the current operating mode may also exist.
A first such operating mode may be automatic operation (Automatic Operation; Auto; Auto Partial), in which the entrance system 10, 410, 510, 610 is automatically operated in the different operational states as described above, and in which the different sensors S1 . . . Sn are selectively controlled to be active or inactive as described in this document, thereby achieving power preservation.
A second operating mode may be Exit (Automatic Exit Only), in which the entrance system 10, 410, 510, 610 is operated in a situation in which all people shall leave the premises where the entrance system is installed, for instance when a shopping mall closes for the day, or when an escape situation has occurred. In the Exit operating mode, at least the outer activity sensor S4; S6 may be kept inactive irrespective of operational state, since people approaching from the outside shall not allowed into the premises. Hence, additional power savings may be made.
A third operating mode may be Open, in which all the movable door members D1 . . . Dm take steady open positions not involving movements of the door members D1 . . . Dm by the automatic door operator. In the Open operating mode, all sensors S1 . . . Sn may be kept inactive. Similar operating modes, which do not involve movements of the door members D1 . . . Dm by the automatic door operator 30 and in which all sensors S1 . . . Sn may be kept inactive and thus save further power, may be Off, Lock Door, Manual Operation and Summer Position.
The invention has been described above in detail with reference to embodiments thereof. However, as is readily understood by those skilled in the art, other embodiments are equally possible within the scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1730102-9 | Apr 2017 | SE | national |
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/492,497, filed on Sep. 9, 2019, which is a 371 of PCT/EP2018/058814, filed on Apr. 6, 2018, published on Oct. 18, 2018, under publication number WO 2018/189042, which claims priority benefits from Swedish Patent Application No. 1730102-9 filed on Apr. 10, 2017. The disclosures of all of these are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4669218 | Kornbrekke | Jun 1987 | A |
4823010 | Kornbrekke | Apr 1989 | A |
4866881 | Morrow | Sep 1989 | A |
5149921 | Picado | Sep 1992 | A |
5963000 | Tsutsumi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6255791 | Ariav | Jul 2001 | B1 |
8225458 | Hoffberg | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8510990 | Agam | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20010030606 | Jaffe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020036476 | Zengguang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20080110093 | Liles | May 2008 | A1 |
20110276234 | Van Gastel | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20160040469 | Lietz | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20180238099 | Schatz et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19900139 | Jul 1999 | DE |
102005040763 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0144882 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0290944 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0789127 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1243943 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1801341 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2101026 | Sep 2009 | EP |
9308356 | Apr 1993 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kornbrekke et al. (EP 0144882 A2) Traffic Responsive Control System for Automatic Swinging Door Date Published Jun. 19, 1985 (Year: 1985). |
Tsutsumi et al. (EP 0789127 A2) Object Sensor System for Automatic Swing Door Date Published Aug. 13, 1997 (Year: 1997). |
Hayashida et al. (DE 19900139 A1) Safety System for Automatic Doors Date Published Jul. 8, 1999 (Year: 1999). |
Ariav et al. (EP 1243943 A1) Ultrasonic Method and Apparatus for Automatically Controlling Moving Doors Date Published Sep. 25, 2002 (Year: 2002). |
International Search Report in PCT/EP2018/058814 dated Jul. 17, 2018. |
International Type Search Report in Swedish Application 1730102-9 dated Dec. 9, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220268090 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16492497 | US | |
Child | 17726796 | US |