The present invention relates to a control device for a turbocharger for supplying compressed intake air to an engine used as a power source of a ship, a vehicle, or an industry machine, for instance.
As a technique to improve an output of an engine, a method (supercharging) of compressing intake air with a turbocharger and supplying an engine with the compressed intake air is known. A typical turbocharger includes an exhaust turbine driven to rotate by exhaust gas flowing through an exhaust channel of an engine, and a compressor turbine for sending intake air in an intake channel into a combustion chamber, the exhaust turbine and the compressor turbine being coupled to each other. The exhaust turbine is driven to rotate by energy of exhaust gas, and the compressor turbine is driven to rotate in accordance with the exhaust turbine. As a result, intake air in the intake channel is supercharged and sent into the combustion chamber, and thereby an output of the engine improves.
In the turbocharger, the exhaust turbine and a turbo bearing are exposed to oil component contained in lubricant oil or exhaust gas under a high-temperature environment, and thus deterioration is likely to occur by sticking or coking of the oil component. Progress of such deterioration leads to wear of components of the turbocharger to decrease fuel-consumption performance of the engine, and even results in malfunction. Thus, early detection of deterioration is desirable.
Patent Document 1 discloses a technique to detect deterioration of a turbocharger of such type. The technique to detect deterioration of a turbocharger disclosed in Patent Document 1 is for a turbocharger equipped with a waste-gate valve, and is to perform abnormality determination on the basis of whether a rotation-speed change that accompanies opening and closing of the waste-gate valve is in a predicted range.
Patent Document 1: JP2013-19319A
However, in Patent Document 1, determination cannot be performed while the waste-gate valve is not in operation, because the determination is performed on the basis of a rotation-speed change that accompanies opening and closing of the waste-gate valve. Further, in general, deterioration of a turbocharger affects not only the rotation speed but also various operation states of the turbocharger. Thus, deterioration of a turbocharger may not be necessarily reflected in a rotation-speed change that accompanies opening and closing of a waste-gate valve. As described above, a deteriorated state of a turbocharger may not be sufficiently detectable by determination based on a specific part of the turbocharger.
Further, Patent Document 1 cannot be applied to a turbocharger not equipped with a waste-gate valve (for instance, to a turbocharger with a variable-vane control).
The present invention was made in view of the above described problem, and an object of the present invention is to provide a control device for a turbocharger, whereby it is possible to detect deterioration of a turbocharger accurately.
To achieve the above object, a control device for a turbocharger for supplying compressed intake air to an internal combustion engine according to the present invention comprises: a storage part configured to pre-store a map which defines a relationship between at least one characteristic parameter and an efficiency of the turbocharger; a detection part configured to detect the at least one characteristic parameter of the turbocharger; a calculation part configured to obtain the efficiency of the turbocharger on the basis of the detected at least one characteristic parameter; a determination part configured to determine presence of deterioration of the turbocharger by comparing the detected at least one characteristic parameter and the obtained efficiency with the map; and an informing part configured to inform a user of a maintenance request if the determination part determines that the deterioration is present.
According to the present invention, a relationship between the characteristic parameters of the turbocharger and the efficiency is defined in advance in form of a map, and the efficiency is compared with an efficiency obtained from the actual measurement of the characteristic parameters detected by the detection part, and thereby presence of deterioration of the turbocharger can be determined. As described above, since the deterioration of the turbocharger is determined on the basis of the efficiency of the turbocharger, the efficiency directly reflecting an influence of the deterioration on fuel-consumption performance of the engine, it is possible to determine the deterioration state of the turbocharger accurately. If it is determined that there is deterioration, the informing part issues a maintenance request, which makes it possible for a user to recognize deterioration of the turbocharger in an early stage to take a suitable measure.
According to an aspect of the present invention, the detection part is configured to detect the at least one characteristic parameter at a predetermined interval, the calculation part is configured to calculate a mean value of the efficiency corresponding to the at least one characteristic parameter having a frequency greater than a predetermined value among the detected at least one characteristic parameter, and accumulate the mean value of the efficiency in the storage part as actual-measurement data associated with the corresponding at least one characteristic parameter, and the determination part is configured to determine presence of deterioration of the turbocharger by comparing an approximate curve obtained from the accumulated actual measurement data and a reference curve obtained from the map.
According to the above aspect, deterioration is determined on the basis of a mean value of the efficiency obtained from characteristic parameters with a high frequency, which makes it possible to reduce an influence of errors and to improve reliability of deterioration determination effectively.
In this case, the determination part may be configured to determine that the deterioration of the turbocharger is present, if a first zone in which the approximate curve is above the reference curve is smaller in area than a second zone in which the approximate curve is below the reference curve, in a space in which the characteristic parameter and the efficiency are variables. According to the above aspect, comparing statistically a relationship between the approximate curve obtained from the actual measurement data and the reference curve obtained from the map makes it possible to perform highly-reliable deterioration determination, as compared to a case in which deterioration determination is performed on the basis of whether a momentary detection result is greater than a reference value.
Further, the determination part is configured to determine that the turbocharger is malfunctioning if a change rate of the efficiency of the turbocharger is greater than a predetermined value on the basis of the accumulated actual-measurement data, and the informing part is configured to issue an alert if the determination part determines that the turbocharger is malfunctioning.
Generally, whereas deterioration of a turbocharger is accompanied by a slow decrease in efficiency, a kind of malfunction of a turbocharger is accompanied by a rapid decrease in efficiency. According to the above aspect, if a change rate of efficiency of the turbocharger is so rapid that exceeds a threshold value, it is determined that the turbocharger is malfunctioning and the malfunctioning is notified distinctively from deterioration, which enables safe operation of the turbocharger.
In another aspect of the present invention, the at least one characteristic parameter comprises a speed ratio and a pressure ratio of the turbocharger, and the map is a three-dimensional map defining the efficiency corresponding to the speed ratio and the pressure ratio. As a result of researches, the present inventors found that, taking into account that performance of a turbocharger depends an inflow state of working air, which is a ratio (=speed ratio) of a rotation speed to a theoretical stage heat drop with respect to each pressure ratio, deterioration determination can be accurately carried out on the basis of an efficiency of a turbocharger as described above by using a plurality of parameters including a speed ratio and a pressure ratio as characteristic parameters of a turbocharger.
Further, an output interface capable of outputting the accumulated actual-measurement data to outside may be provided.
With the above aspect, actual measurement data used in the deterioration determination can be outputted via an output interface, which makes it possible to specifically determine an actual operational state of a turbocharger being actually used by a user. Such information is extremely useful in design development, for instance.
According to the present embodiment, a relationship between the characteristic parameters of the turbocharger and the efficiency is determined in advance in form of a map, and the efficiency is compared with the efficiency obtained from the actual measurement of the characteristic parameters detected by the detection part, and thereby presence of deterioration of the turbocharger can be determined. As described above, since deterioration of the turbocharger is determined on the basis of the efficiency of the turbocharger, the efficiency directly reflecting an influence of the deterioration on fuel-consumption performance of the engine, it is possible to determine the deterioration state of the turbocharger accurately. If it is determined that there is deterioration, the informing part issues a maintenance request, which makes it possible for a user to recognize deterioration of the turbocharger in an early stage to take a suitable measure.
The embodiments of the present invention will now be described specifically with reference to the drawings. It is intended, however, that unless particularly specified, dimensions, materials, shapes, relative positions and the like of components described in the embodiments shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not limitative of the scope of the present invention.
When being introduced into the combustion chamber 11, the intake air is mixed with fuel injected by a fuel injection device 40 disposed in the vicinity of an inlet of the intake port 7 to produce mixed gas, and the ignition device 12 combusts the mixed gas in the combustion chamber 11. Exhaust gas generated in the combustion chamber 11 is discharged to an exhaust channel 15 via an exhaust valve 14 from an exhaust port 13. The exhaust channel 15 includes an exhaust turbine 16 driven by exhaust gas of the engine 1. The exhaust turbine 16 is driven to rotate by exhaust gas, and thereby the compressor 4 coupled to the exhaust turbine 16 is driven to rotate. Accordingly, the exhaust turbine 16 and the compressor 4 constitute a turbocharger 17 which compresses intake air in the intake channel 3.
A branch channel 18 is formed in the exhaust channel 15 so as to bypass the exhaust turbine 16. A waste-gate valve 19 is disposed in the branch channel 18. The exhaust turbine 16 is provided with a rotation speed sensor 20 for detecting a rotation speed of the exhaust turbine 16. Further, the exhaust turbine 16 is provided with an inlet temperature sensor 21 and an inlet pressure sensor 22 for detecting an inlet temperature Tin and an inlet pressure Pin of the exhaust turbine 16, respectively, and an outlet temperature sensor 23 and an outlet pressure sensor 24 for detecting an outlet temperature Tout an outlet pressure Pout the exhaust turbine 16, respectively.
The operation state of the engine 1 is controlled by an engine control unit (ECU) 25. In
The operation state of the turbocharger 17 is controlled by a turbocharger control unit (TCU) 26. In
Although illustrated as separate units in
The storage part 27 stores a map 33 which determines a relationship between a characteristic parameter and an efficiency of the turbocharger 17. The map 33 is stored in the storage part 27 prior to execution of a deterioration determination control, and is configured to be readable when appropriate in each step described below. The relationship between the characteristic parameter and the efficiency stored in the map 33 is determined for a sample (i.e., an ideal turbocharger 17) without deterioration, the sample serving as the basis of the deterioration determination, and the relationship may be defined in advance experimentally, theoretically, or on the basis of simulation.
Referring again to
The informing part 31 informs a user of a maintenance request if the determination part 30 determines that there is deterioration. A maintenance request widely includes information for having a user recognize deterioration of the exhaust turbocharger 17, in a broad sense. A user having received a maintenance request can take a countermeasure in an early stage to avoid an influence of reduced performance which accompanies deterioration of the turbocharger 17.
Next, with reference to
First, the detection part 28 obtains detection values from various sensors at a regular interval of a predetermined period T1 (e.g. one second) (step S101). The detection values obtained by the detection part 28 may be accumulated in the storage part 27, and be readable by an external reader via the output interface 32 when appropriate. Such accumulated data is extremely advantageous in design development, for instance, because an actual operation state of the turbocharger 17 can be specifically determined from the accumulated data.
Next, the calculation part 29 receives detection values obtained by the detection part 28, and calculates a speed ratio, a pressure ratio, and an efficiency (step S102). The speed ratio can be obtained by an expression of u/C0, where u (=rω) is a circumferential speed the turbocharger, and C0 is a speed corresponding to an adiabatic heat drop. Further, the pressure ratio can be obtained by an expression of Pout/Pin, where Pin is a detection pressure value of the inlet pressure sensor and Pout is a detection pressure value of the outlet pressure sensor. Further, the efficiency can be obtained from the following equation, where κ is a specific heat ratio.
Further, the calculation result obtained by the calculation part 29 also may be stored in the storage part 27 each time, and be readable by an external reader via the output interface 32 when appropriate.
Next, in step S103, it is determined whether the time T is greater than a predetermined value T2 (>T1, e.g. 1800 seconds). If not greater than T2, the process returns to step S101, and the above process is repeated (step S103: NO). Specifically, steps S101 and S102 are repeated until the time T exceeds T2.
When the predetermined time T2 elapses, (step S103: YES), the calculation part 29 generates data distribution of data accumulated in the storage part 27 with respect to the speed ratio and the pressure ratio (step S104).
The calculation part 29 calculates a mean value ηave of the efficiency calculated in step S102 using data with a number greater than a reference value N1 set in advance (N1=1000 in
Data with a number greater than the reference value N1 are indicated by arrows in
The calculation part 29 obtains the mean value ηave of the efficiency for the characteristic parameters with a high repetition frequency as described above, and then resets the number of data only for the characteristic parameters used in the calculation (in other words, for the other characteristic parameters not having reached the reference value N1 in
While no small number of errors may be included in the operation state of the turbocharger 17 depending on the combustion state of the engine 1, it is possible to reduce an influence of errors and increase reliability by determining performance deterioration on the basis of the mean value ηave of the efficiency calculated for characteristic parameters with high detection frequency as described above.
Accordingly, the calculation part 29 calculates a mean efficiency ηave with respect a particular frequently-repeated combination of the speed ratio and the pressure ratio, for each time T2. In step S106, it is determined whether the time T is greater than a predetermined value T3 (>T2, e.g. one week). If the time T is not greater than T3, the process returns to step S101, and the above process is repeated (step S106: NO). Specifically, the above calculation is repeated until the time T exceeds T3.
When time T3 elapses (step S106: YES), the determination part 30 plots on a graph mean efficiencies ηave with respect to combinations of the speed ratio and the pressure ratio calculated so far (step S107), and compares the plotted graph with the reference curve obtained from the map 33, thereby determining presence of deterioration of the turbocharger 17 (step S108).
Particularly in the present embodiment, the determination part 30 obtains an approximate curve of the mean values ηave of the efficiency obtained in step S105, and compares the approximate curve with the reference curve obtained from the map 33, thereby determining presence of deterioration to the turbocharger 17. The approximate curve can be obtained by a known method, such as the mean-square method.
In
In the turbocharger, the exhaust turbine and a turbo bearing are exposed to oil component contained in lubricant oil or exhaust gas under a high-temperature environment, and thus the exhaust turbine is likely to be deteriorated by sticking of or coking of the oil component. Such deterioration can be fixed by cleaning substances adhering to rotor blades of the exhaust turbine. Thus, if the turbocharger 17 is disposed on a ship or the like and is cleanable, a message or a sound may be outputted as a maintenance request to request cleaning of the substances adhering to the rotor blades of the exhaust turbine. In contrast, if the turbocharger 17 is disposed on a vehicle or the like and cleaning the turbocharger 17 is difficult or impracticable, a message or a sound may be outputted to request replacement of the deteriorated turbocharger 17.
In contrast to the above, if the first zone 34 is larger in area than the second zone 35, it is determined that the exhaust turbocharger 17 is not deteriorated, and the process ends (steps S111).
As described above, determining deterioration statistically on the basis of a relationship between the approximate curve obtained from the actual measurement data and the reference curve obtained from the map 33 makes it possible to perform highly-reliable deterioration determination, as compared to a case in which deterioration determination is performed merely on the basis of whether a momentary detection result is greater than a reference value for a moment.
As described above, according to the present embodiment, a relationship between the characteristic parameters and the efficiency of the turbocharger 17 is determined in advance in form of the map 33, and the efficiency is compared with an efficiency obtained from the actual measurement of the characteristic parameters detected by the detection part 28, and thereby presence of deterioration of the turbocharger 17 is determined. As described above, since deterioration of the turbocharger 17 is determined on the basis of the efficiency of the turbocharger 17, the efficiency directly reflecting an influence of the deterioration on fuel-consumption performance of the engine 1, it is possible to determine the deterioration state of the turbocharger 17 accurately. If it is determined that there is deterioration, the informing part 31 issues a maintenance request, which makes it possible for a user to recognize deterioration of the turbocharger 17 in an early stage to take a suitable measure.
In the above embodiment, the determination part 30 determines only the presence of deterioration of the turbocharger 17. Further to this, it is possible to determine not only deterioration but also malfunction of the turbocharger 17 distinctively by monitoring a time-series change of the efficiency obtained by the calculation part 29.
In general, if the performance of the turbocharger 17 is to deteriorate, the efficiency decreases gradually with time. In contrast, if a kind of malfunction is to occur in the turbocharger 17, the efficiency is predicted to change rapidly. In the present modified example, a change rate of the mean value of the efficiency obtained in step S105 is obtained, and a time-series change of the change rate is monitored.
The determination part 30 has a threshold value dηave/dt1 prepared in advance for the change rate dηave/dt of the efficiency to detect malfunction, and determines that malfunction has occurred if the change rate dηave/dt is greater than the threshold value dηave/dt1. In this case, the informing part 31 issues an alert different from the maintenance request issued in case of deterioration, which makes it possible to have a user recognize occurrence of malfunction. Accordingly, informing a user of occurrence of malfunction distinctively from presence of deterioration enables highly-reliable operation of the turbocharger 17.
In the present embodiment, as illustrated in
The TCU 26 obtains detection values from various sensors (the rotation speed sensor 20, the inlet temperature sensor 21, the inlet pressure sensor 22, the outlet temperature sensor 23, and the outlet pressure sensor 24) disposed on the turbocharger 17, and thereby performs the deterioration determination control on the turbocharger, similarly to the first embodiment. The deterioration determination control of the present invention can be similarly performed on a variable-displacement type turbocharger not including a waste-gate valve, because the control is based on the characteristic parameters and the efficiency which are basic characteristics independent from the configuration type of the turbocharger 17.
In the present embodiment, as illustrated in
The high-pressure stage turbine 16A and the low-pressure stage turbine 16B include a rotation-speed sensor 20A and a rotation speed sensor 20B, respectively, for detecting the rotation speed of each turbine. Further, the high-pressure stage turbine 16A is provided with an inlet temperature sensor 21A and an inlet pressure sensor 22A for detecting an inlet temperature TinA and an inlet pressure PinA of the high-pressure stage turbine 16A, respectively, and an outlet temperature sensor 23A and an outlet pressure sensor 24A for detecting an outlet temperature ToutA and an outlet pressure PoutA of the high-pressure stage turbine 16A, respectively. Further, the low-pressure stage turbine 16B is provided with an inlet temperature sensor 21B and an inlet pressure sensor 22B for detecting an inlet temperature TinB and an inlet pressure PinB of the low-pressure stage turbine 16B, respectively, and an outlet temperature sensor 23B and an outlet pressure sensor 24B for detecting an outlet temperature ToutB and an outlet pressure PoutB of the low-pressure stage turbine 16B, respectively.
The TCU 26 obtains detection values from the above sensors, and thereby performs the deterioration determination control described specifically with reference to the first embodiment on the high-pressure stage turbocharger 17A and the low-pressure stage turbocharger 17B independently. The deterioration determination control of the present invention can be similarly introduced into a complex system including combination of a plurality of turbochargers, because the control is based on the characteristic parameters and the efficiency η, which are characteristics of the individual turbochargers 17.
The present invention can be suitably applied to a control device for a turbocharger disposed in an exhaust system of an internal combustion engine used as a power source of, for instance, a ship, a vehicle, or an industry machine.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-251253 | Dec 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/081387 | 11/27/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/083614 | 6/11/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4672814 | Abo | Jun 1987 | A |
4698972 | Ueno | Oct 1987 | A |
4756377 | Kawamura et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4774811 | Kawamura | Oct 1988 | A |
4884407 | Hatanaka | Dec 1989 | A |
5073865 | Togai | Dec 1991 | A |
5645033 | Person et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6089018 | Bischoff et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6158416 | Chen | Dec 2000 | A |
6209390 | LaRue et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6327856 | Iwabuchi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
8051661 | Igarashi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8584460 | Måardberg et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8813494 | Hofer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030145591 | Arnold | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030216856 | Jacobson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040139809 | Soechting et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040187495 | Ando et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050193810 | Gladden | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060021344 | Barba et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026960 | Butscher et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060113799 | Obayashi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225418 | Kishimoto | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248889 | Sagisaka | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287795 | Samad et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080022679 | Hara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047268 | Isogai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053091 | Barthelet | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090107140 | Pursifull | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090222190 | Andreae et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287448 | Brown et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299609 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110192161 | Takahaski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110288744 | Gokhale et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130042609 | Cianflone | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130167810 | Roplekar et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130227944 | Denholm et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150037178 | Wang | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150068506 | Gokhale | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150122234 | Tanaka | May 2015 | A1 |
20150285122 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160312687 | Kemmerling | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170002726 | Iwamoto | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1360714 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101105429 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101424211 | May 2009 | CN |
101273385 | May 2010 | CN |
102177323 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102418610 | Apr 2012 | CN |
2 317 082 | May 2011 | EP |
2434123 | Mar 2012 | EP |
58-53643 | Mar 1983 | JP |
59-52139 | Apr 1984 | JP |
61-38127 | Mar 1986 | JP |
62-210222 | Sep 1987 | JP |
64-32019 | Feb 1989 | JP |
5-33668 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-280365 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6-323158 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6-341325 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-150990 | Jun 1995 | JP |
8-836555 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-329032 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-159576 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-179348 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-356158 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-342840 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-188474 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-544443 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-227362 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-209183 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-27897 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-251203 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-83317 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-155384 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-248952 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-351129 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-63873 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-188989 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-207506 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-242462 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-242487 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-32860 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-206007 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-45410 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-544144 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-175126 | Jul 2008 | JP |
4209350 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010-14122 | Jan 2010 | JP |
4415912 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-180710 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010-190145 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2011-247181 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2011-256743 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-7544 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-52508 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-19319 | Jan 2013 | JP |
WO 2013066529 | May 2013 | JP |
2013-127221 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013-133776 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013-185441 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2013-217382 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2014-84772 | May 2014 | JP |
WO 0070562 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 03071111 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2006138545 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007055094 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007141613 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2013004595 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013157126 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 1, 2016, for European Application No. 14868701.5. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 10, 2017 issued in the corresponding EP Application No. 14867944.2 |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report, dated Feb. 28, 2017, for European Application No. 14868535.7. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report, dated Mar. 2, 2017, for European Application No. 14867002.9. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/IB/338, PCT/IB/373, PCT/ISA/237 and PCT/IB/326), dated Jun. 16, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/079634, together with an English translation thereof. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/IB/338, PCT/IB/373, PCT/ISA/237 and PCT/IB/326), dated Jun. 16, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081381, together with an English translation thereof. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/IB/338, PCT/IB/373, PCT/ISA/237 and PCT/IB/326), dated Jun. 16, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081384, together with an English translation thereof. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/IB/338, PCT/IB/373, PCT/ISA/237 and PCT/IB/326), dated Jun. 16, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081387, together with an English translation thereof. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/IB/338, PCT/IB/373, PCT/ISA/237 and PCT/IB/326), dated Jun. 16, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081723, together with an English translation thereof. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/210, PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/237), dated Feb. 3, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/079634. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/210, PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/237), dated Jan. 27, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081384. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/210, PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/237), dated Mar. 3, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081381. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/210, PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/237), dated Mar. 3, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081387. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Forms PCT/ISA/210, PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/237), dated Mar. 3, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/JP2014/081723. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 14868295.8. |
Office Action dated May 31, 2017, issued to the corresponding Chinese Application No. 201480051228.1 with an English translation. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Jun. 8, 2017, for European Application No. 14868535.7. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report, dated Aug. 3, 2017, for Chinese Application No. 201480050503.8, with an English translation of the Office Action. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report, dated Aug. 7, 2017, for Chinese Application No. 201480050503.8, with an English translation of the Office Action. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201480060612.8, dated Sep. 5, 2017, with an English translation of the Office Action. |
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2013-251248, dated Sep. 1, 2017, with an English translation. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480065709.8, dated Nov. 3, 2017 with English translation. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,642, dated Sep. 15, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160237936 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |