The present exemplary embodiment relates to an electrode assembly for controlling particle flow. It finds particular application in conjunction with the printing arts, and will be described with particular reference thereto. However, it is to be appreciated that the present exemplary embodiment is also amenable to other like applications such as pharmaceutical processing of powdered medication.
In accordance with one aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, a system for selectively controlling particle flow is provided. The system comprises a passage adapted for housing the flow of a gas therethrough. The passage defines an inlet and an outlet. The system also comprises a particle container and a branch conduit providing communication between the passage and the particle container. The branch conduit provides communication with the passage at a location between the inlet and the outlet. The system also comprises a gating assembly defining an aperture and disposed in the branch conduit. The gating assembly includes an inlet electrode, an exit electrode, and a control electrode. Each electrode is adapted to emit an electric field.
In accordance with another aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, a method for controlling particle flow from a particle source to a flowing medium is provided. The method is performed in a system comprising a passage adapted for housing a flowing medium, a particle source, and a conduit providing communication between the passage and the particle source. As a result of the flowing medium in the passage, particles from the particle source are drawn toward the flowing medium. The method comprises providing an electrode assembly of at least three electrodes in the system such that particles flowing from the particle source to the passage, flow past and in close proximity to the electrode assembly. The method also comprises applying a multi-phase voltage waveform to the electrode assembly to selectively control particle flow from the particle source to the passage.
The exemplary embodiment relates to an electrode assembly comprising at least three electrodes. Specifically, a third electrode with a switchable control voltage is utilized to augment an on-demand 2 phase electrostatic gating assembly. The gating assembly is particularly adapted for controlling flow of toner in a ballistic aerosol marking (BAM) printer. Use of the exemplary embodiment gating assembly can speed up transient response to On/Off switching, and is especially useful at high writing frequencies. Extending from a binary implementation, the exemplary embodiment gating assembly may also be used for graduated increase or decrease of toner flow by providing the necessary electric field assist or electric field reversal. This capability lends itself to gray level control. The exemplary embodiment is also applicable to the processing of fine particulates such as those in drug delivery systems.
Until recently, powder ballistic aerosol marking (BAM) was a technology being developed for high-speed (60–120 ppm) direct marking. BAM printing has the potential for xerographic quality image robustness. Some notable advances include the design of re-circulating toner supply systems, high-speed drilling of sub-50 um apertures, and on demand 2 phase electrostatic gating of 6 um EA toner through 50 um apertures. Particle electrodynamics of collisional toner motion has been simulated in three-dimensions and shown to compare favorably with lab experimentation. Simulation has also contributed to increased understanding, which has driven the ensuing knowledge-based design for device optimization. The exemplary embodiment gating assembly enables optimal toner gating. Details and information relating to ballistic aerosol marking systems, components, and processes are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,751,865; 6,719,399; 6,598,954; 6,523,928; 6,521,297; 6,511,149; 6,467,871; 6,467,862; 6,454,384; 6,439,711; 6,416,159; 6,416,158; 6,340,216; 6,328,409; 6,293,659; and 6,116,718; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The exemplary embodiment gating assembly utilizes 2 phase gating and is more efficient than other gating configurations based upon 3 phase or 4 phase systems. The reason for the increased efficiency is that the aspect ratio of aperture height to aperture width becomes smaller and therefore makes it easier for toner or other particles to pass through the small but shorter aperture. This reduction to 2 phase gating significantly simplifies fabrication and eventual reduction to practice. For 50 um apertures, only very low agglomeration or “fluffy” 6 um toner can be squeezed through the aperture. Modeling has shown that this is indeed possible. This has subsequently been verified experimentally using a Minco grid for traveling wave transport of the toner with 90 degree coupling to the aperture. The aperture is fabricated from an Au coated 2 mil Kapton film with a laser-drilled 50 um hole. A 4 phase circuit is used to drive the traveling wave to transport the toner. The fluidized toner is gated through a 2 phase aperture by electrostatic forces. Toner is gated using two sequential phases of the 4 phase used for transport. Cyan EA toner gated from the supply below is deposited on the upper exit electrode surface around the 50 um aperture.
It should be noted that planar toner transport requires a minimum of 3 phase excitation to provide directionality to cloud motion. Any of the voltage combinations will transport any of the toner polarity combinations equally well for the same E field levels. The fundamental mechanism is that positive toner is pushed in front of a positive pulse while negative toner is pulled behind the positive pulse and vice versa. The difference introduced by aperture gating is the asymmetry due to the geometry. For example, a positive entrance electrode voltage acts to repel positive toner while loading the aperture with negative toner. This action affects the next half-cycle as less positive toner is now available in the vicinity for gating.
The gating electrodes such as electrodes 150 and 160 in
Gated toner is continually replenished to maintain constant cloud density. Specifically,
The gating of toner at high frequencies, or writing speeds, requires faster rise times and shorter decay times in order to meet the precise toner metering requirements. The present exemplary embodiment gating assembly specifically utilizes a third electrode to introduce an axial E field to address this requirement. Both operating configurations are simulated using parameters listed in Table 1, below.
A third electrode is represented for example as 170 in
The shut OFF case is even more dramatic due to the higher axial E fields.
Although the various multi-electrode gating assemblies described herein are noted as using three electrodes, the exemplary embodiment includes gating assemblies with more than three electrodes. It is contemplated that a gating assembly with various stages can be provided, or one with multiple control electrodes, multiple exit electrodes and/or multiple inlet electrodes.
The exemplary embodiment has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the exemplary embodiment be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4896174 | Stearns | Jan 1990 | A |
5893015 | Mojarradi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6116718 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134412 | Thompson | Oct 2000 | A |
6137979 | Gartstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6219515 | Lestrange | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246855 | Gartstein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272296 | Gartstein | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290342 | Vo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293659 | Floyd et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328409 | Peeters et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340216 | Peeters et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351623 | Thayer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6416158 | Floyd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416159 | Floyd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439711 | Carlini et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454384 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467862 | Peeters et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467871 | Moffat et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499831 | Schmidlin | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511149 | Lean et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521297 | McDougall et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523928 | Peeters et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6598954 | Moffat et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6719399 | McDougall et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751865 | Peeters et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060077230 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |