The disclosure relates to a manual controller for controlling a machine.
Manual controllers are often used to control heavy machines. They are used to control cranes, wheel loaders, excavators, and forklifts or as speed controllers for rail vehicles and ships, for example. They are operated like a joystick. In general, many types of machines that are operated manually can be controlled with a manual controller. Modular designs support the use of a manual controller in many arrangements for machine controllers.
The machine is controlled based on the angular position of the control shaft, which is connected to the control lever. The angular position can be detected with or without contact. Arrangements in which the angular position is detected electro-optically by means of an encoder disk are known. However, the angular position can also be detected electronically using a potentiometer, for example.
There are manual controllers that only operate on one axis, but multi-axis manual controllers are also used. Accordingly, the multi-axis manual controller has at least two non-parallel control shafts driven via a suitable transmission.
A remote control to control vehicles with a maneuvering device are known from DE 20 2010 000 176, whereby the remote control is equipped with an input device and in which the degrees of freedom of motion of the vehicle to be controlled are mapped to the degrees of freedom of motion of the input device.
EP 0 671 604 A1 describes a joystick having two potentiometers that are linked to a control lever via a gimbal. Each position of the control lever is associated with a corresponding position of the sliding contact of the potentiometer so that the values of the voltages detected on the potentiometer terminals can be fed to an evaluation circuit. A device is proposed for the evaluation circuit to convert an at least one-dimensional mechanical deflection to a corresponding electrical value equal to the amount of this deflection in which one end of a pair of sliding contacts is controlled with electrical control signals via at least two contact surfaces. The other end of the pair of sliding contacts is moved over the number of parallel conductive tracks required for a specific resolution. Due to the displacement of the pair of sliding contacts, the control signals are fed via the contacted conductor tracks on the end thereof as evaluation signals.
EP 0856 453 A2 describes an electro-hydraulic steering system for vehicles that has manual steering and automatic steering (autopilot), which is activated via a switch. The steering system comprises at least one hydraulic steering cylinder for adjusting the steerable wheels, at least one sensor for determining current values of the wheel turning angle, at least one electrically operated hydraulic control valve which controls the pressurization of the steering cylinder with hydraulic fluid and at least one automatic steering signal generator for generating electrical steering signal setpoints for the wheel steering angle. In each case, the automatically generated steering signal setpoints and the current values of the wheel steering angle are fed to an electronic control and evaluation device. This control and evaluation device determines an electrical control signal for the hydraulic control valve from the current value of the wheel steering angle and the automatically generated steering signal setpoint. A steering signal generator is provided for the manual steering that also generates a corresponding electrical steering signal setpoint from a manual movement, which is also fed to the control and evaluation device. Depending on which steering is active, the control and evaluation device evaluates the setpoints of the manual or automatic steering signal. A control lever (joystick) can also be used as a manual steering signal generator.
The object of the invention is to avoid the disadvantages of the prior art and to provide a manual controller for controlling a machine in which the user immediately receives haptic feedback from the manual controller in relation to the deflection.
The object is achieved in that in a manual control generator for controlling a machine includes a mounting platform. A control lever is mounted in a joint on the mounting platform so that it can pivot about an axis. A position sensor detects the deflection of the control lever and generates a signal corresponding to the deflection. An evaluation and processing unit processes the signal from the position sensor and controls the machine according to the deflection. A return mechanism returns the control lever back to the starting position. A sliding guide on the control lever is provided, whereby a sliding block, which is guided along a deflection curve of the sliding guide, determines the progression of force required for the deflection of the control lever.
The return mechanism of the control lever of a manual controller combines many advantages over previously used systems. This allows the restoring forces, force-deflection diagrams, optional force variations, and even asymmetric force progressions to be adapted by changing only one component, namely the sliding guide. This sliding guide is a curve segment that is permanently connected to the handle of the manual controller, although if necessary, said sliding guide can be designed to be exchangeable by means of a threaded connection and/or suitable plug connections. In this case the deflection curve and/or the contour of the curve segment primarily determines the progression of the restoring forces.
An advantageous embodiment of the manual controller is then achieved in that the sliding block or the sliding guide is elastically preloaded. Through a concave contour on the curve segment, a lever, for example, is moved away from the attachment point of an elastic element on the curve segment via a sliding block formed as a thrust ball bearing, and the distance between the attachment points increases. As a result of this, it is possible to realize restoring forces which act between the sliding guide and the sliding block. For example, the thrust ball bearing, which forms the sliding block, rotatably mounted via the lever is pulled by means of elastic elements on the sliding guide, which is formed as a cam disk. The sliding block follows the curve contour when the control lever is deflected. This leads to a non-linear increase and/or a progressive variation of the restoring force. Such a variation of force is desired especially for steering joysticks.
In a further preferable embodiment of the manual controller, the sliding block or the sliding guide is elastically preloaded by a spring. Springs are commercially available components that are available in various sizes. It is then easy to construct the manual controller with sliding guide. The restoring force is preferably realized via two tension springs. The resulting redundancy thus fulfills the requirements for many safety-related applications. The manual controller can be built very compactly with only few components. In spite of the compactness, it is still possible to generate relatively large restoring torques. Another big advantage is the low wear of the return mechanism due to the design.
A further preferred variant of the manual controller is achieved in that the deflection curve is designed to be variable and adjustable using an adjusting element. This measure serves to ensure that the deflection curve can be adapted to the needs of the user. For this purpose, the deflection curve exchanged completely or in segments, for example. Designs are also conceivable in which the deflection curve itself can be partially or completely changed by moving elements. By means of an adjustment mechanism with suitable adjusting elements, it would also be possible to change the shape and/or form of the deflection curve.
An advantageous embodiment of the manual controller is furthermore obtained by providing at least one pivot point and/or shoulder for the sliding block in the deflection curve. It is not only possible to influence the progressivity of the force via the shape of the curve segment, but is also possible to realize center pivots and force surges using pivot points and shoulders, for example.
In an advantageous embodiment of the manual controller, a tracking device with a frame and/or a housing is provided. The tracking device is arranged on the mounting platform in this case. Furthermore, the joint is provided in the frame and/or the housing. The control lever of the manual controller then assumes the deflected position that is also associated with the machine. The control lever is always returned to a relative starting position after a control command. This starting position of the control lever is then deflected separately.
The manual controller then preferably has a control unit which then readjusts a drive of the tracking device to an assigned position, whereby the assigned position is determined by the machine controlled with the deflection. The effect of the control instruction is thus determined and assigned to a position of the control lever. In a rail vehicle, for example, the speed can be set by operating the manual controller, whereby a setpoint is defined. When the rail vehicle has reached the speed setpoint, the control unit adjusts the control lever by moving it through a corresponding angle, which is assigned to this speed. The user immediately sees which setpoint has been set.
An advantageous embodiment of the manual controller results from the fact that the drive has a rotor, which adjusts the tracking device by an angle (3, which determines the position assigned to the machine adjusted by the deflection angle co. This measure causes the tracking device to rotate with the control lever through an assigned angle with the rotor. This saves space, and the user can easily determine the corresponding position of the control lever.
In a preferred embodiment of the manual controller, the drive of the tracking device has a gearbox. The drives often rotate too fast so that the speed can be reduced by a gearbox. Preferably, the gearbox of the drive of the tracking device is then provided as a self-locking gearbox.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the manual controller, the return mechanism has a spring element. With the spring element, the control lever is returned after a deflection of the control lever to a starting position against the spring force due to the spring element. In particular, damping means can be provided here to avoid the control lever from overshooting. Suspending the control lever between two spring elements not only has a damping effect, but also provides redundancy, which makes the manual controller more failure-proof.
Further embodiments and advantages result from the subject of the dependent claims and the drawings with the accompanying descriptions. An embodiment is explained in more detail in the following with references to the accompanying drawings. The invention should not be limited solely to the embodiments listed. They are only intended to illustrate the invention.
A position sensor leader 26 detects every deflection ω of the control lever 18 and generates an angle signal associated with the corresponding deflection. The angle ω of the deflection is also referred to in the following as the guide angle ω. An evaluation and processing unit 28 processes the signal of the position sensor 26. A machine is controlled through the guide angle ω according to the deflection. A return mechanism 30 always returns the control lever 18 to its starting position 32 without applying any force. The control lever 18 is located in a housing 34 of the tracking device 14 of the manual controller 12.
A tracking device 14 actively operates the control shaft 20 with an actuator 36. For this purpose, the position sensor 26 generates the angle signal, which corresponds to the respective deflection of the control lever 20 around the pivot axis 24. The position relative to the mounting platform 16 can change, provided that the tracking device 14 has also changed position.
The tracking device 14 also comprises a motor drive 38, which controls a rotor 42 via a gearbox 40. The motor drive 38 is preferably designed as a DC motor. The evaluation and processing unit 28 controls the motor drive 38 such that the rotor 42 rotates through an angle β with respect to the housing 34. The rotor 42 thus changes its angular position relative to the housing 34.
The rotor 42 is controlled via a control unit 44. The angle β of the rotor 42 is referred to as the feedback angle, which is measured relative to the housing 34. The actuator 36 has a self-locking property so that the position of the rotor 42 cannot be changed by applying force to the control lever 18.
The control lever 18 is connected to a sliding guide 46. The bottom of the sliding guide 46 in this diagram is formed with a deflection curve 47. The shape of the deflection curve 47, for example as shown in
When the control lever 18 is deflected, the spring element 54 is compressed or expanded or released according to the sliding guide 46. This allows the forces acting on the control lever 18 when deflected to be defined based on the shape of the curve. The spring forces of the spring element 54 can also be designed depending on the degree of hardness that said spring forces influence the forces applied to the control lever 18 upon deflection.
The position sensor 26 detects every deflection ω of the control lever 18 and generates an angle signal associated with the guide angle. The evaluation and processing unit 28 processes the signal of the position sensor 26. A machine is controlled through the guide angle co according to the deflection. The return mechanism 30 comprising here in particular the spring element 54, in interaction with the sliding block 50 and the sliding guide 46, always returns the control lever 18 without force to its starting position 32. The damping module 62 in the present embodiment comprises two damping elements 64. The control lever 18 is arranged between these damping elements 64. The shape of the curve of the sliding guide 46 supports the return process due to its shape since the spring elements 54 can be guided accordingly from a tensioned state to a released state.
The tracking device 14 actively acts with the actuator 36 on the control shaft 20 as described in
The position sensor leader 26 detects every deflection ω of the control lever 18 and generates an angle signal associated with the corresponding deflection. The evaluation and processing unit 28 processes the signal of the position sensor 26. A machine is controlled through the guide angle ω according to the deflection. The return mechanism 30 always returns the control lever 18 to its starting position 32 without applying any force. The control lever 18, as previously described in the embodiment, is firmly connected to the sliding guide 46.
Various curve shapes are therefore shown as examples in
The sliding guide 46 can be designed such that it helps to prevent the control lever 18 from overshooting when returning the control lever 18 to the starting position 32. Additional damping means can provide additional support to this function to prevent the control lever 18 from overshooting. The damping means, for example, can be designed as a magnetically, pneumatically, or hydraulically driven element or as a friction element.
The sliding guides 46 in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 115 863.4 | Jul 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2018/100600 | 6/29/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/011373 | 1/17/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3095754 | Mayon | Jul 1963 | A |
5229742 | Miyamoto | Jul 1993 | A |
5986585 | Pusch | Nov 1999 | A |
6067782 | Diekhans | May 2000 | A |
20080142642 | Marino | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20120025030 | Stachniak et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130133456 | Matsushita | May 2013 | A1 |
20150268691 | Schaub et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202010000176 | Jun 2011 | DE |
0671604 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0856453 | Aug 1998 | EP |
2924535 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2008181478 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009301097 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2011100333 | May 2011 | JP |
2008017344 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2019011373 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dr. Kapelevich, A., Dr. Taye, E. (2012) Applications for Self-Locking Gears. GearSolutions. https://gearsolutions.com/features/applications-for-self-locking-gears/ (Year: 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200201376 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |