This application claims priority to provisional application 60/836,022 filed Aug. 7, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Hydraulic control of downhole systems has long been a trusted and thus ubiquitous choice of well operators. Hydraulic control lines are relatively small, are simple to operate and very reliably transmit pressure to distant locations where either the existence of pressure is used as a signal or a higher pressure fluid volume is used to actuate a shiftable device downhole.
In older well completions relatively little control was used in the downhole environment and correspondingly few control lines were needed to extend back to the surface. In view of the relatively small number of lines, dealing with them with openings through packers (feed-through packers, etc.) and the like has always been accepted and functional. As wellbore complexity has increased however with an ever-expanding need for control related to improved production quality and quantity, a greater number of flow modifying structures (e.g. valves) and other downhole equipment has been placed downhole to enhance return on investment. With the additional devices downhole comes a requirement to provide a control regime for such devices. While hydraulic control lines are still quite well favored as a control means, the multiplicity of controllable devices causes the number of control lines required with today's technology to exceed the space available to run them. In many typical completions today the number of control lines will equal the number of devices plus 1. With consideration of the possibility of 15000 feet of wellbore having perhaps 40 valves or other controllable devices, it is easily imagined that the needed 41 control lines will have difficulty fitting in the 9⅝ inch annulus around a completion string.
In view of the foregoing, the art would certainly welcome a means for reducing the number of control lines necessary to individually control a multiplicity of devices downhole.
Disclosed herein is a control valve. The valve includes a housing, an inlet port at the housing, a device port at the housing, a valve port at the housing, and a spool disposed at the housing, the spool initially connecting the inlet port to the device port and subsequently to a pressure event connecting the inlet port to the valve port.
Further disclosed herein is an actuation system. The actuation system includes a plurality of control valves, each valve being addressable and conditionable to communicate with one of a device and another control valve, and a plurality of devices each in operable communication with one of the plurality of control valves.
Initially it is pointed out that while described embodiments of the control valve and system hereof may be described in terms of downhole equipment or use, the hydraulic activation system can be applied to any field in which it would be advantageous to control multiple devices with only three control lines.
Referring to
Effectuating the ability of the valve to provide the two communication paths (pressure or flow paths), the spool 12 is cyclable between two positions. Movement from a first position to a second position happens automatically upon a first application and release of pressure to the valve either initially or after a reset and movement from the second position to the first position is achievable by application of pressure to a separate port of the control valve discussed further hereunder. It is to be understood that automatic movement from the first to the second position can occur as already stated and can also occur simultaneously with the second pressure event after initial use or reset for applications where it is desirable that the first communication path be left connected until the second pressure event. Such, for example, may be the case where fine adjustment is desired of the device being actuate and a back flow of fluid therethrough is efficacious of the desired result.
With respect to the illustrated embodiment and more specifically referring to
Still referring to
Addressing Assemblies R and Q in detail, each assembly is exposable to pressure at inlet port 14 as illustrated in the figure through R branch 34 and Q branch 36, respectively. It will be appreciated from the figure that the assemblies are pressure actuated at axially different ends. A lock shuttle 38 is disposed between the assemblies R and Q and configured for selective engagement therewith.
Upon application of pressure to inlet 14, branch 34 and branch 36 transmit pressure, and volume to the assemblies R and Q. When pressure is applied to assembly R, piston 40 moves against the bias of spring 42 toward the upper margin of the figure. This movement disengages pin 44 from recess 28. Simultaneously, piston 46 of assembly Q moves toward the bottom margin of the figure against the bias of spring 48 to engage pin 50 with recess 30. It is to be appreciated that the spring rates between spring 42 and spring 48 are different. Spring 48 is of a lesser spring rate to ensure that the pin 50 engages recess 30 prior to pin 44 releasing recess 28. This, as is apparent from the foregoing discussion and drawing figure is necessary to prevent the spool 12 moving to the second position prematurely. As was noted earlier, the positioning of recesses 28 and 30, prevent the reengagement of pin 44 with recess 28 once released from recess 28 (until reset). The shuttle 38 automatically moves into assembly Q upon the simultaneous movement of the assemblies and is locked there. Shuttle 38 remains locked in assembly Q until pressure is bled from branches 34 and 36. In order for the shuttle to unlock from assembly Q, assembly R must move to a position where the shuttle can move thereinto. This occurs when the pin 44 rests on an outside surface 52 of spool 12, which readies the spool 12 for its shift to the second position under the impetus of spring 32. As soon as the pin 44 reaches the outside surface 52 the pin 44 itself is urged against a spring 45 within a cavity 47 of piston 40, the shuttle is moveable into assembly R thereby releasing assembly Q. Because assembly Q is biased by spring 48, assembly Q moves to a position of disengagement with recess 30. Once pin 50 is disengaged with recess 30, and recalling that pin 44 is resting on surface 52 as opposed to being engaged with recess 28, the spool is free to move leftwardly in the figure in order to position the spool in the second position. Resetting of the control valve requires pressure at reset port 24 which urges spool 12 against the spring 32 until pin 44 reengages recess 28 under the bias of spring 42. It will be appreciated that the engagement of shuttle 38 with piston 40 is a loose fit to allow piston 40 and pin 44 to move into engagement with recess 28 even when engaged with shuttle 38.
The control valve(s) 10 as described above enable hydraulic actuation and control of from one to many downhole devices while requiring only three control lines (illustrated as A, B and C in the drawings hereof) in any given position of the system and a number of control valves equal to the number of devices. The control valves may be a part of the devices themselves or separate therefrom as desired.
Referring now to
Following the first pressure up and release of line A, control valve 10 automatically shifts to the second position. This is illustrated schematically in
Identically to the action just described in control valve 10a, control valve 10b is activated initially (or after reset) by a first pressure up of indicator 62. It will be understood that as first use of the entire system, or after reset, which occurs in all control valves simultaneously, pressure at inlet port 14b is achieved only by pressuring up twice on line A. Indeed the number of pressure events to activate a particular control valve at initial use or after reset is equal to the number of control valves preceding the target valve plus one. Likewise, the first pressure up event experienced by each valve will result in pressure at device port 16 while a second or subsequent pressure event experienced as each valve will be transmitted to valve port 22 and thus to the next valve in a series of valves. A series of valves may be as long as desired without detrimental effect until frictional forces incurred by the actuating fluid build to a degree that pressure change becomes insufficient to operate devices or cycle the control valves. With the use of a common ¼ inch control line and the control valves as configured in
When addressing control valve 10b as illustrated in
Upon a subsequent pressure event for control valve 10b, pressure is passed through spool port 20b to valve port 22b through another flow indicator 66 to inlet port 14c of control valve 10c which is illustrated as addressed in
As will be appreciated from the foregoing, any or all of the devices 100, 110, 120 or 130 can be selectively positioned as desired in the open or closed position pursuant to the appropriate number of pressure cycles (1 plus the number of devices preceding the target device) and the conditioning of line C to either permit pressure to exhaust therethrough or to not allow pressure to exhaust therethrough thus allowing actuation of the device or causing the device to remain hydrolocked in place, respectively.
Further to the selective actuation from a first position to a second position of the devices as disclosed above, the control valve(s) and system described herein also facilitate selective actuation of target devices from the second position to the first position.
In order for the target device to move from the second position to the first position, the device must already be in the second position, the line pressure in line C must be greater than that in line A and the control valve associated with the target device must be in a position connecting the inlet port 14 of the control valve with the device port 18 of the control valve. This set of conditions allows pressure from line C to act on the target device while pressure is exhausted from that device through line A. Target devices are in this way addressed one at a time as any device whose control valve is set in the position connecting the inlet port 14 to the valve port 22 is dead headed at device port 18 thereby hydraulically locking that device. In the system as illustrated, all but one of the control valves in the entire system is deadheaded. Thus for any given position of the system, only one device is operable based upon a pressure up on line C. Because of this, selective control of every individual device (or groups of devices if so configured on a particular or each control valve) is achievable with the system hereof. As a worst case scenario on time required to operate a specific device, if the control valve of the target device is currently in the second position, a reset and then a pressure up sequence equal to the number of preceding valves is required to gain the required fluid connection for a pressure-up on line C to actuate the target device from the second to the first position.
The control valve and system described herein advantageously offers selective actuation between first and second positions of a particular one of a plurality of actuatable devices using solely three hydraulic control lines at any given location within a wellbore or the other installation requiring control of multiple devices using a limited number of control lines.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2395150 | Sloan et al. | Feb 1946 | A |
3719196 | McJones | Mar 1973 | A |
3797740 | Kah, Jr. | Mar 1974 | A |
4249599 | Krause | Feb 1981 | A |
4637419 | Hughes | Jan 1987 | A |
5445182 | Sturman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5778918 | McLelland | Jul 1998 | A |
5832996 | Carmody et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6567013 | Purkis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
20040050555 | Rayssiguier et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
539201 | Sep 1984 | AU |
2207218 | Jan 1989 | GB |
2377721 | Jan 2003 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Well Dynamics, Transforming Reservoirs: Intelligent Completion Technology. “Remotely Control and Manage Even the Most Complex Reservoirs” Jan. 30, 2008: Website having 1 page, Data Sheet having 4 pages. Retrieved Online on Jun. 24, 2008 from: http://www.welldynamics.conn/fc—downhole—digital—hydraulics.html. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Intelligent Well Systems Product Technical Specification: InForce Single Line Switch.” Baker Hughes Incorporated, Product Family H81503: 2008, 10 pages. |
Anderson, A. “Integrating Intelligent Well Systems with Other Completion Technologies.” Technology & Services, Business Briefing: Exploration & Production: The Oil & Gas Review, Mar. 2005. 4 pages. Retrieved online on Jun. 24, 2008 from: http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/1195/Baker—tech.pdf. |
Morgan, D. “Shell Ups the “Smart Field” Stakes.” Oil Online, Jul. 25, 2005: 4 pages. Retrieved Online on Jun. 24, 2008 from: http://www.oilonline.com/news/features/aog/20050725.Shell—up.18636.asp. |
PCT International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/2007/074635, Date Mailed Oct. 23, 2007, Date Filed Jul. 27, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080029163 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60836022 | Aug 2006 | US |