Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to converters and, more particularly, to a control device for quasi-resonant AC/DC off-line converters.
Description of the Related Art
Converters, and particularly offline drivers of LED-based lamps for bulb replacement, are often desired to have a power factor greater than 0.9, low total harmonic distortion (THD) and to provide safety isolation. At the same time, for cost reasons, it is desirable to regulate the output DC current required for proper LED driving without closing a feedback loop.
High-power-factor (hi-PF) flyback converters are able to meet power factor and isolation specifications with a simple and inexpensive power stage. In a hi-PF flyback converter there is not an energy reservoir capacitor directly connected across the DC side of the input rectifier bridge, so that the voltage applied to the power stage is a rectified sinusoid. To achieve high-PF, the input current must track the input voltage, thus originating a time-dependent input-to-output power flow. As a result, the output current contains a large AC component at twice the main line's frequency.
A quasi-resonant flyback converter has the power switch turn-on synchronized to the instant the transformer demagnetizes (i.e. the secondary current has become zero), normally after an appropriate delay. This allows the turn-on to occur on the valley of the drain voltage ringing that follows the demagnetization, often termed “valley-switching.” Most commonly, peak current mode control is used, so the turn-off of the power switch is determined by the current sense signal reaching the value programmed by the control loop that regulates the output voltage or current.
In a flyback converter the input current is the average of the primary current, which flows only during the ON-time of the power switch, resulting in a series of triangles separated by voids corresponding to the OFF-time of the power switch. This “chopping” causes the average value of the primary current to be lower than half the peak value and depend on the mark-space ratio of the triangles. As a result, the input current is no longer proportional to the envelope of the peaks and unlike the envelope, which is sinusoidal, the input current is not sinusoidal. Although a sinusoidal-like shape is maintained, the input current is distorted. This distorted sinusoidal input current results in a flyback converter that fails to achieve low THD or unity power factor.
On the secondary side of the converter, a secondary winding Ls of the transformer 36 has one end connected to the secondary ground and the other end connected to the anode of a diode D having a cathode connected to the positive plate of a capacitor Cout that has its negative plate connected to the secondary ground. This flyback converter 30 generates at its output terminals across Cout a DC voltage Vout that will supply a load (not shown). The load is generally a string of high-brightness LEDs.
The quantity to be regulated (either the output voltage Vout or the output current Iout) is compared to a reference value and an error signal IFB depending on their difference is generated. This signal is transferred to the primary side by an isolated feedback block 40, typically implemented by an optocoupler (or other means able to cross the isolation barrier complying with the safety requirements of IEC60950). On the primary side, this error signal is a current IFB that is sunk from a dedicated pin FB in the controller 38, producing a control voltage Vc on said pin FB. If the open-loop bandwidth of the overall control loop, determined by a frequency compensation network located inside the isolated feedback block 40, is narrow enough—typically below 20 Hz—and a steady-state operation is assumed, the control voltage Vc can be regarded as a DC level, at least to a first approximation.
Inside the controller 38, control voltage Vc is internally fed into one input of a multiplier block 42, having another input that receives, via a pin MULT and a midpoint of the resistive divider Ra/Rb a portion of the instantaneous rectified line voltage Vin(θ) sensed across Cin.
The output of the multiplier block 42 is the product of a rectified sinusoid times a DC level, then still a rectified sinusoid whose amplitude depends on the rms line voltage Vin(θ) and the amplitude of the control voltage Vc; this will be the reference voltage VcsREF(θ) for the peak primary current.
The VcsREF(θ) signal is fed to the inverting input of a pulse width modulation comparator 44 that receives at its non-inverting input the voltage Vcs(t, θ), sensed across the sense resistor Rs, which is a voltage proportional to the instantaneous current Ip(t, θ) flowing through the primary winding Lp of the transformer 36 and the power switch M when the power switch is ON. Assuming power switch M is initially ON, the current through the primary winding Lp will be ramping up and so will the voltage across Rs. When Vcs(t, θ) equals VcsREF(θ) the PWM comparator 44 resets a SR flip-flop 46, which switches off the power switch M. Therefore, the output of the multiplier 42, shaped as a rectified sinusoid, determines the peak value of the current in the primary winding Lp that, as a result, will be enveloped by a rectified sinusoid.
When the power switch M is switched off, the energy stored in the primary winding Lp is transferred by magnetic coupling to the secondary winding Ls and then dumped into the output capacitor Cout and the load until the secondary winding Ls is completely demagnetized. At this point, the diode D opens and the drain node, which was fixed at Vin(θ)+VR while the secondary winding Ls and the diode D were conducting, becomes floating. The drain node voltage would tend to eventually reach the instantaneous line voltage Vin(θ) through a damped ringing due to its parasitic capacitance that starts resonating with the primary winding Lp. The quick drain voltage fall that follows transformer 36 demagnetizing is coupled to a pin ZCD of the controller 38 through the auxiliary winding Laux and the resistor RZCD. A zero-crossing detector (ZCD) block 48 releases a pulse every time it detects a negative-going edge falling below a threshold and this pulse sets the SR flip flop 46 and drives ON the power switch M, starting a new switching cycle.
An OR gate 50 between the ZCD block 48 and the set input of the SR flip flop 46 allows the output of a starter block 52 to initiate a switching cycle. The starter block 52 produces a signal at power-on when no signal is available on the pin ZCD input and prevents the converter 30 from getting stuck in case the signal on the pin ZCD input is lost for any reason.
Assuming θϵ(0, π), according to the control scheme under consideration the peak envelope of the primary current is given by:
Ipkp(θ)=Ip(TON,θ)=IPKp sin θ.
It is worth noticing that this scheme results in a constant ON-time TON of the power switch M:
For simplicity, the OFF-time TOFF(θ) of the power switch M will be considered coincident with the time TFW(θ) during which current circulates on the secondary side. In other words, the time interval TR during which the voltage across the primary switch rings until reaching the valley of the ringing will be neglected. This is acceptable as long as TR<<TOFF(θ).
The switching period T(θ) is therefore given by:
T(θ)=TON+TFW(θ).
Considering volt-second balance across the primary winding Lp it is possible to write:
where VR is the reflected voltage, i.e. the output voltage Vout times the primary-to-secondary turns ratio n=Np/Ns, seen across the primary winding Lp of the transformer 36 in the time interval TFW(θ):
VR=n(Vout+VF)
wherein VF is the forward drop on the secondary diode D. Therefore, T(θ) can be rewritten as:
T(θ)=TON(1+Kv sin θ)
with Kv=VPK/VR.
The input current to the converter 30 is found by averaging the primary current Ip(t, θ) in the primary winding Lp over a switching cycle. Ip(t, θ) is the series of gray triangles in the right-hand side diagram of
This shows that the input current is not a pure sinusoid. The function sin θ/(1+Kv sin θ), plotted in
This current is sinusoidal only for Kv=0; when Kv≠0, although a sinusoidal-like shape is maintained, the input current is distorted, the higher Kv the higher the distortion. Since Kv cannot be zero (which would require the reflected voltage to tend to infinity), this prior art QR control scheme does not permit zero total harmonic distortion (THD) of the input current nor unity power factor in the flyback converter 30 even in the ideal case.
Although the distortion is significant, especially at high line (i.e. high Kv), the individual harmonics are still well within the limits considered by the regulation on the limits for harmonic current emissions, the IEC61000-3-2 (or its Japanese homologous, the JEIDA-MITI). An example of harmonic measurements on a real-world application is shown in
Still considering the SSL market, recently this inherent distortion is becoming a problem. In fact, as shown in the plot of
One embodiment of the present disclosure is a quasi-resonant flyback converter having a sinusoidal input current that achieves low total harmonic distortion and high power factor.
One embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a control circuit that enables Hi-PF QR flyback converters with peak current mode control to draw a sinusoidal current from the input source.
One embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a device for controlling a power transistor of a power circuit. The device has a driver circuit, the driver circuit including a first input configured to receive a voltage reference signal, and an output configured to drive the power transistor based on the voltage reference signal. A driver control circuit is configured to provide the voltage reference signal to the driver circuit, with the driver control circuit including a multiplier having a first input configured to receive a first signal based on an feedback signal from the power circuit, a second input configured to receive a second signal, and an output, the multiplier being configured to produce a multiplier signal based on a multiplication of the first and second signals. The driver control circuit also includes a first current generator coupled to the multiplier and configured to produce a current reference signal, a resistor coupled to an output of the first current generator, and a switch configured to couple the resistor in parallel with a capacitor when the power transistor is on.
This disclosure presents a novel control method that enables Hi-PF QR flyback converters with peak current mode control to ideally draw a sinusoidal current from the input source, thus performing like boost converters operated in the same way.
One idea of the present disclosure stems from observing the waveforms shown on the right-hand side of
In contrast, in the prior art flyback converter of
To express this quantitatively, it is worth re-examining (1):
The term Ipkp(θ), which represents the peak envelope of the primary current, is sinusoidal so the distortion is originated by the term TON/T(θ), introduced by the primary current being chopped, which is not constant (TON is constant but T(θ) is not).
The inventors discovered that if the current reference VcsREF(θ) that determines Ipkp(θ) is distorted with a term T(θ)/TON, this will cancel out the term TON/T(θ) introduced by averaging and result in a sinusoidal average primary current, i.e. in a sinusoidal input current. Then, the control objective can be expressed in the following terms:
wherein TON is denoted as a function of the instantaneous line phase θ. In fact, with a method different from that of the prior art it is not necessarily constant.
On the secondary side of the converter 100A, a secondary winding Ls of the transformer 108 has one end connected to a secondary ground and the other end connected to the anode of a diode D having the cathode connected to the positive plate of a capacitor Cout that has its negative plate connected to the secondary ground. An output voltage Vout supplies power to a load (not shown). The quantity to be regulated (either the output voltage Vout or the output current Iout) is compared to a reference value and an error signal IFB is generated. This signal is transferred to the primary side by an isolated feedback block 134, typically implemented by an optocoupler (or other means able to cross the isolation barrier complying with the safety requirements of IEC60950). On the primary side, this error signal IFB is sunk from a dedicated pin FB in the controller 102A, producing a control voltage Vc on said pin FB. The open-loop bandwidth of the overall control loop is determined by a frequency compensation network located inside the isolated feedback block 134.
The controller 102A has a shaper circuit 120A, a PWM comparator 122, an SR flip flop 124, an OR gate 126, a starter block 128, a ZCD block 130, and a driver 132. The shaper circuit 120A is configured to produce a reference voltage VCSREF based on a voltage Vc and a portion of the instantaneous rectified line voltage Vin(θ) received from the midpoint of the resistive divider Ra/Rb via the pin MULT. The PWM comparator 122 is configured to receive as inputs the reference voltage VCSREF and the voltage VCS sensed at the resistor RS. The SR flip flop 124 has reset and set inputs R, S that respectively receive the output of the PWM comparator 122 and the output of the OR gate 126. The driver 132 receives as an input the output of the SR flip flop 124, and configured to drive the power switch M via an output signal provided to a terminal GD coupled to the gate of the power switch M. The ZCD block 130 is configured to release a pulse when a detected falling edge of a signal, received from the auxiliary winding Laux and resistor RZCD via the terminal ZCD, goes below a threshold value. The starter block 128 is configured to release a pulse on start-up or when the ZCD block 130 receives no input signal. The OR gate 126 has inputs that respectively receive the outputs of the starter block 128 and ZCD block 130 and provides a set signal to the set input S of the flip-flop 124 when either of the outputs from the starter block 128 and ZCD block 130 is positive.
A multiplier 140 is coupled to the shaper circuit 120A. The shaper circuit 120A has a current generator 142, a resistor Rt, and a switch 143 that switchably couples the resistor Rt to ground. The multiplier 140 has a first input that receives the voltage Vc, a second input that receives the portion of the line voltage Vin(θ) from the terminal MULT, and an output at which the multiplier produces a multiplied voltage that is the product of the two voltages received at the inputs. The current generator 142 is controlled by the output of the multiplier 140 and is configured to output a current Ich(θ) that acts on the switched resistor Rt and an external capacitor Ct having one terminal connected to ground.
The resistor Rt is connected in parallel to the capacitor Ct when a signal Q provided to the control terminal of the switch 143 is high. The signal Q is provided by the output of the SR flip-flop 124 and is high during the on-time of the power switch M. The switch 143 disconnects the resistor Rt from ground when the signal Q is low, i.e. during the off-time of the power switch M. The voltage developed across Ct is the reference voltage VcsREF(θ) and is fed to the inverting input of the PWM comparator 122.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure Ct is integrated in a semiconductor chip with the controller 102A, thus saving one pin of the controller 102A and one external component.
The current Ich(θ) provided by the current generator 142 can be expressed as:
Ich(θ)=gmKmKp(VPK sin θ)Vc
where gm is the voltage-to-current gain of the current generator 142, KM is the gain of the multiplier, Kp is the divider ratio of the resistive divider Ra/Rb, and VPK sin(θ) is the peak value of the line voltage Vin(θ). Note that the control voltage Vc is nearly constant along a line half-cycle, thus the charging current Ich(θ) has a sinusoidal shape.
An assumption for the following analysis is that T(θ)<<Rt Ct<<1/fL. In this way, the switching frequency ripple across the capacitor Ct is negligible and the current Ich(θ) can be considered constant within each switching cycle.
The reference voltage VcsREF(θ) developed across the capacitor Ct by charge balance is therefore:
The control circuit in
Ich(θ)=gmKp(VPK sin θ).
As in the controller 102A, the capacitor Ct is charged by the current generator 142 and discharged by the switched resistor Rt in the controller 102B. Also in this controller 102B the connection of the input voltage Vc is unchanged from the control voltage Vc of the controller 102A. Similar to the controller 102A, the resistor Rt is connected in parallel to the capacitor Ct by the switch 143 only when the signal Q is high, i.e. during the on-time of the power switch M.
At this point it is clear that a third possible embodiment would have the current generator 142, resistor Rt, switch 143, and capacitor Ct connected to the multiplier 140 input where the control voltage Vc is applied, with the current Ich(θ) of current generator 142 proportional to the control voltage Vc. This will be taken for granted and will not be further considered.
In this embodiment, a shaper circuit 120C is implemented with a small-signal MOSFET Ma, its gate resistor Rg, the capacitor Ct and the resistor Rb. A small-signal BJT is also considered for the switch, in place of the small-signal MOSFET.
The MOSFET Ma is driven by the gate driver GD of the power switch M, thus connecting the lower resistor Rb of the divider Ra-Rb to ground during the on-time of the power switch M. Since the input voltage is much larger than the voltage on pin MULT for most of the line cycle, resistor Ra performs as the current generator, producing current Ich(θ) as:
It is a common practice to have a bypass capacitor connected between pins MULT and GND to reduce noise pick-up in a sensitive point such as the multiplier input. The very same capacitor can serve as the capacitor Ct in
These results are confirmed by the measurements summarized in
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5729443 | Pavlin | Mar 1998 | A |
6181120 | Hawkes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6356466 | Smidt et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6853563 | Yang et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6944034 | Shteynberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7425857 | Confalonieri et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
8467209 | Adragna | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8513926 | Park et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520416 | Xie et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8686668 | Grotkowski et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9190835 | Chen | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9520796 | Adragna | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9621029 | Gritti | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20120026765 | Adragna | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120281438 | Fang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130070485 | Li et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130088897 | Adragna | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130114308 | Liao et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154487 | Kuang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162297 | Gravati | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20160103158 | Gravati | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160172981 | Gritti | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160248323 | Gritti | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160276936 | Gritti | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170117814 | Adragna | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 753 148 | Sep 2015 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Adragna, C., “Design Equations of High-Power-Factor Flyback Converters Based on the L6561,” AN 1059 (Application Note), STMicroelectronics, pp. 1-20, Sep. 2003. |
Adragna, C., “Primary-Controlled High-PF Flyback Converters Deliver Constant Dc Output Current,” Proceedings of the 2011-14th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE 2011), Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
Erickson, R. et al., “Design of a Simple High-Power-Factor Rectifier based on the Flyback Converter”, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 1990, APEC '90, Conference Proceedings 1990, pp. 792-801, Mar. 1990. |
Adragna et al., “Flyback Converters with the L6561 PFC Controller,” AN1060 (Application Note), STMicroelectronics, pp. 1-11, Jan. 2003. |
Wang et al., “An Improved Control Strategy Based on Multiplier for CRM Flyback PFC to Reduce Line Current Peak Distortion,” IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Sep. 12-16, 2010, pp. 901-905. |
Yan et al., “Variable-On-Time-Controlled Critical-Conduction-Mode Flyback PFC Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 61(11):6091-6099, Nov. 2014. |
Zhang et al., “An Optimal Peak Current Mode Control Scheme for Critical Conduction Mode (CRM) Buck PFC Converter,” 10th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting (ChinaSSL), Nov. 10-12, 2013, pp. 182-189. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170117814 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14572638 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15344288 | US |