Control method for a hand-held power tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10493611
  • Patent Number
    10,493,611
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 1, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
The hand-held power tool has a tool holder (2) for holding a tool (4) along a working axis (12). A hammer mechanism (6) has a striker (15) that is moved periodically along the working axis at an impact rate. A drive control (18) of the hammer mechanism (6) sets the impact rate to a set point value. A vibration absorber (19) has an oscillator (21) that moves along the working axis (12) about a resting position and one or multiple springs (20) that drive the oscillator (21) back into the resting position. A calibration phase comprises the following steps: detection of an acceleration using the acceleration sensor (24); determination of a minimum of the acceleration by varying the impact rate in a range of between 90% and 110% of the set point value; and adjusting the set point to the impact rate associated with the ascertained minimum.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a control method for a hand-held power tool including a vibration absorber for damping periodic vibrations.


U.S. Pat. No. 8,434,565 B2 describes a hammer drill whose hammer mechanism drives a bit at an impact frequency into a substrate. The vibrations which occur at the impact frequency are damped by a vibration absorber. The vibration absorber includes a freely suspended oscillator which is capable of oscillating back and forth out of a resting position along the impact direction. Springs drive the oscillator back into the resting position after a deflection. The mass of the oscillator and the resilience of the springs are adapted to the impact frequency.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Control method for a hand-held power tool. The hand-held power tool includes a tool holder for holding a tool on a working axis. A hammer mechanism includes a striker which is moved periodically at an impact rate on the working axis. A drive control of the hammer mechanism sets the impact rate to a setpoint value. A vibration absorber includes an oscillator which is movable along the working axis about a resting position and one or multiple spring(s) which drive(s) the oscillator back into the resting position. A calibration phase includes the following steps: detecting an acceleration with the aid of the acceleration sensor, ascertaining a minimum of the acceleration by varying the impact rate in a range between 90% and 110% of the setpoint value, and adjusting the setpoint value to the impact rate associated with the ascertained minimum.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The following description elucidates the present invention based on exemplary specific embodiments and the drawing.



FIG. 1 shows a hammer drill,





In the drawing, elements which are identical or have identical functions are identified with identical reference numerals, unless otherwise indicated.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically shows a hammer drill 1 as an example of a hand-held power tool. Hammer drill 1 includes a tool holder 2 into which a shaft end 3 of a tool, for example of a drill bit 4, may be inserted. In the case of a primary drive, hammer drill 1 is driven by a motor 5 which drives a hammer mechanism 6 and an output shaft 7. A battery pack 8 or a mains line supplies motor 5 with power. Pneumatic hammer mechanism 6 and preferably the other driving components are situated within a machine housing 9. A user may guide hammer drill 1 with the aid of a handle 10 which is fastened to machine housing 9. Motor 5 and thus hammer drill 1 may be started up with the aid of a system switch 11. During operation, hammer drill 1 continuously rotates drill bit 4 about a working axis 12 and is capable of driving drill bit 4 into a substrate in impact direction 13 along working axis 12.


Pneumatic hammer mechanism 6 includes an exciter 14 and a striker 15 which are movably guided in a guiding tube 16 along working axis 12. Exciter 14 and striker 15 close pneumatic chamber 17 in-between each other. Exciter 14 is periodically moved back and forth on working axis 12 by motor 5. Pneumatic chamber 17 forms a pneumatic spring which connects striker 15 to the movement of exciter 14. The cycle duration is predefined by the forced movement of exciter 14. A motor controller 18 controls the rotational speed of motor 5 to a setpoint value. The rotational speed predefines the cycle duration. The setpoint value of the rotational speed is configured to provide for an efficient pneumatic coupling of striker 15 to exciter 14. The impact rate of hammer mechanism 6 is inverse to the cycle duration and is typically in the range between 10 Hz and 100 Hz.


The periodic movements of exciter 14 and striker 15 introduce vibrations into machine housing 9 which are transferred to handle 10. The user in particular feels the acceleration of striker 15 at the compression point.


A vibration absorber 19 in machine housing 9 reduces the amplitude of the vibrations. Vibration absorber 19 includes an oscillator 21 which is suspended on one or multiple spring(s) 20. The inertia of oscillator 21 effectuates a relative movement of oscillator 21 in relation to vibrating machine housing 9. The periodic vibrations of hammer mechanism 6 along working axis 12 result in a periodic deflection of oscillator 21 in relation to a resting position in machine housing 9. Only springs 20 connect oscillator 21 to machine housing 9 and to handle 10 and exert a restoring force into the resting position on oscillator 21 in the case of a deflection. Oscillator 21 oscillates between a turning point which is close to the tool and a turning point which is remote from the tool. The periodicity is equal to the impact frequency of the periodic excitation. The amplitude of deflection is a function of the amplitude of the vibrations and the impact frequency.


Exemplary vibration absorber 19 includes an oscillator 21 which is guided in a linear bearing along an axis 22. Axis 22 is parallel to or inclined by less than 30 degrees in relation to working axis 12. Springs 20 are, for example, coil springs with the aid of which oscillator 21 is supported along axis 22 on machine housing 9. An alternative vibration absorber includes an oscillator which is guided on a bent pathway. The oscillator is suspended on machine housing 9 via an oscillating arm. The oscillating arm is a flexible spring which is situated perpendicularly to the working axis.


Oscillating vibration absorber 19 effectuates a reduction of the vibrations transferred to handle 10. The reduction does not take place through a dissipative effect of vibration absorber 19. Vibration absorber 19, together with hammer mechanism 6, rather forms a contiguous oscillating system, having a nodal point of vibration. The system is coordinated in such a way that the connecting point of the system to machine housing 9 and handle 10 coincides with the nodal point of vibration. The optimal reduction is achieved when the impact frequency is equal to the natural frequency of vibration absorber 19. The natural frequency is the frequency at which vibration absorber 19 oscillates after being deflected once without further excitation. The natural frequency is predefined by the mass of oscillator 21 and the stiffness of springs 20. The natural frequency may change over the lifetime, in particular the effective stiffness of springs 20 changes.


Vibration absorber 19 includes a damping controller 23 which modifies the rotational speed of motor 5 for the purpose of optimizing the vibration reduction by vibration absorber 19. Damping controller 23 includes an acceleration sensor 24 which detects accelerations or vibrations at handle 10 or machine housing 9 along working axis 12. Damping controller 23 adapts the rotational speed of motor 5 to vibration absorber 19 during a calibration phase.


Exemplary damping controller 23 includes a data memory 25 in which a most recently determined setpoint value for the impact rate of hammer mechanism 6 or the setpoint rotational speed of motor 5 is stored. The setpoint value preferably corresponds to the natural frequency of vibration absorber 19 or is just below it, e.g., between 90% and 100% of the natural frequency, preferably between 95% and 100% of the natural frequency. In a new unit, a natural frequency which is predefined to the specifications of vibration absorber 19 may be stored as the setpoint value in data memory 25. The setpoint value for the impact rate and the setpoint rotational speed of motor 5 differ only by a fixed factor which is predefined by a gear reduction ratio.


Motor 5 is accelerated to the setpoint value when hammer drill 1 is switched on by actuating system switch 11, for example. Damping controller 23 may carry out the calibration directly after the tool has been switched on.


An exemplary calibration provides that the rotational speed of hammer drill 1 is reduced stepwise or continuously in relation to the setpoint rotational speed. While the rotational speed is being reduced, damping controller 23 detects the amplitude of the acceleration detected by acceleration sensor 24. The vibrations change due to hammer mechanism 6 and vibration absorber 19. Hammer mechanism 6 forms the source for the vibrations. Reduced performance of hammer mechanism 6 accordingly results in fewer vibrations. However, an arbitrary reduction is not desirable, since hammer mechanism 6 is to be operated at maximum impact power and minor vibrations. It proves to be that the effect of vibration absorber 19, which depends heavily on the frequency, may be used to adapt vibration absorber 19. The rotational speed is reduced until the vibrations increase again due to the declining effect of vibration absorber 19. The reduction of the rotational speed is terminated. The rotational speed at which the vibration minimum is established is stored as the new setpoint value in data memory 25. The calibration is terminated. The rotational speed of motor 5 is adjusted to the new setpoint value.


The reduction of the rotational speed is stopped when a minimum rotational speed is fallen below without a local vibration minimum being established. The minimum rotational speed is, for example, 90% of the setpoint value. A further reduction of the rotational speed is unfavorable. The calibration increases the rotational speed starting from the setpoint value. Hammer mechanism 6 typically generates more vibrations as the rotational speed increases. The effect of vibration absorber 19 typically dominates the vibration behavior. The rotational speed is increased until a drop in the vibrations and a following increase in the vibrations is detected. The rotational speed at the ascertained minimum is stored as the new setpoint value. The calibration is terminated. The increase in the rotational speed is aborted if the rotational speed exceeds a maximum rotational speed. The maximum rotational speed is 110% of the setpoint value.

Claims
  • 1. A control method for a hand-held power tool including a machine housing, a handle fastened to the machine housing for guiding the hand-held power tool during operation, a tool holder for holding a tool on a working axis, a hammer mechanism including a striker moving periodically at an impact rate on the working axis, a drive control of the hammer mechanism setting the impact rate to a setpoint value, a vibration absorber including an oscillator moving with respect to the working axis back and forth from a resting position and at least one spring driving the oscillator back into the resting position, an acceleration sensor attached to a machine housing for detecting accelerations along the working axis, the control method comprising a calibration phase having the following steps: detecting an acceleration with the aid of the acceleration sensor;ascertaining a minimum of the acceleration by varying the impact rate in a range between 90% and 110% of the setpoint value;adjusting the setpoint value to the impact rate associated with the ascertained minimum; anddriving the hammer mechanism at the impact rate adjusted to the setpoint value.
  • 2. The control method as recited in claim 1 wherein the at least one spring includes a first spring on one side of the oscillator and a second spring on another side of the oscillator.
  • 3. The control method as recited in claim 1 wherein the oscillator moves back and forth guided in a linear bearing along a linear bearing axis parallel or inclined less than 30 degrees in relation to the working axis.
  • 4. The control method as recited in claim 1 further comprising storing a most recently determined setpoint value of the setpoint value of the impact rate in a data memory.
  • 5. The control method as recited in claim 1 further comprising accelerating the motor to the setpoint value using an actuating system switch.
  • 6. The control method as recited in claim 1 further comprising stepwise reducing a rotational speed of the power tool in relation to a setpoint rotational speed during the calibration phase.
  • 7. The control method as recited in claim 1 further comprising continuously reducing a rotational speed of the power tool in relation to a setpoint rotational speed during the calibration phase.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
14196019 Dec 2014 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2015/078176 12/1/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/087426 6/9/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (45)
Number Name Date Kind
2875731 Settles Mar 1959 A
3845827 Schulin Nov 1974 A
4014392 Ross Mar 1977 A
4282938 Minamidate Aug 1981 A
4316512 Kibblewhite Feb 1982 A
4478293 Weilenmann Oct 1984 A
5176026 Leeb Jan 1993 A
5546786 Fugel Aug 1996 A
6863479 Frauhammer Mar 2005 B2
6948570 Kristen Sep 2005 B2
6962211 Daubner Nov 2005 B2
7204322 Sakai Apr 2007 B2
7383895 Aoki Jun 2008 B2
7451833 Hahn Nov 2008 B2
7500527 Fischer Mar 2009 B2
7588097 Kamegai Sep 2009 B2
7604071 Ikuta Oct 2009 B2
7766096 Satou Aug 2010 B2
7806201 Aoki Oct 2010 B2
20279741 Schlesak et al. Nov 2012
8434565 Hecht May 2013 B2
8813537 Diego Aug 2014 B1
20040119467 Sondergeld Jun 2004 A1
20040200628 Schmitzer Oct 2004 A1
20040226728 Boeni Nov 2004 A1
20060086515 Engelfried Apr 2006 A1
20060102365 Phillips May 2006 A1
20080179152 Moessnang Jul 2008 A1
20090151967 Haas Jun 2009 A1
20090188686 Keskiniva Jul 2009 A1
20090218114 Ohlendorf Sep 2009 A1
20090250233 Wallace Oct 2009 A1
20100224383 John Sep 2010 A1
20100236801 Furusawa Sep 2010 A1
20110024149 Hecht Feb 2011 A1
20110155405 Aoki Jun 2011 A1
20110303429 Kohlschmied Dec 2011 A1
20120103643 Binder May 2012 A1
20120261153 Aoki Oct 2012 A1
20130133912 Mizuno May 2013 A1
20140102741 Sekino Apr 2014 A1
20150367492 Lindell Dec 2015 A1
20160375570 Boeck Dec 2016 A1
20180001462 Ontl Jan 2018 A1
20180370008 Peters Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
101733735 Jun 2010 CN
102012221517 May 2014 DE
2189249 May 2010 EP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170361447 A1 Dec 2017 US