This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,122, filed on Mar. 22, 2001, entitled “ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITRY WITH HETEROGENEOUS AND RECONFIGURABLE MATRICES OF DIVERSE AND ADAPTIVE COMPUTATIONAL UNITS HAVING FIXED, APPLICATION SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL ELEMENTS”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/443,596, filed on May 21, 2003, entitled, “PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE FOR A RECONFIGURABLE ARITHMETIC NODE IN AN ADAPTIVE COMPUTING SYSTEM” ; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/443,554 filed on May 21, 2003, entitled, “UNIFORM INTERFACE FOR A FUNCTIONAL NODE IN AN ADAPTIVE COMPUTING ENGINE”.
This invention relates in general to digital data processing and more specifically to an interconnection facility for transferring digital information among components in an adaptive computing architecture.
A common limitation to processing performance in a digital system is the efficiency and speed of transferring instruction, data and other information among different components and subsystems within the digital system. For example, the bus speed in a general-purpose Von Neumann architecture dictates how fast data can be transferred between the processor and memory and, as a result, places a limit on the computing performance (e.g., million instructions per second (MIPS), floating-point operations per second (FLOPS), etc.).
Other types of computer architecture design, such as multi-processor or parallel processor designs require complex communication, or interconnection, capabilities so that each of the different processors can communicate with other processors, with multiple memory devices, input/output (I/O) ports, etc. With today's complex processor system designs, the importance of an efficient and fast interconnection facility rises dramatically. However, such facilities are difficult to design to optimize goals of speed, flexibility and simplicity of design.
A hardware task manager indicates when input and output buffer resources are sufficient to allow a task to execute. The task can require an arbitrary number of input values from one or more other (or the same) tasks. Likewise, a number of output buffers must also be available before the task can start to execute and store results in the output buffers.
The hardware task manager maintains a counter in association with each input and output buffer. For input buffers, a negative value for the counter means that there is no data in the buffer and, hence, the respective input buffer is not ready or available. Thus, the associated task can not run. Predetermined numbers of bytes, or “units,” are stored into the input buffer and an associated counter is incremented. When the counter value transitions from a negative value to a zero the high-order bit of the counter is cleared, thereby indicating the input buffer has sufficient data and is available to be processed by a task.
Analogously, a counter is maintained in association with each output buffer. A negative value for an output buffer means that the output buffer is available to receive data. When the high-order bit of an output buffer counter is set then data can be written to the associated output buffer and the task can run.
Ports counters are used to aggregate buffer counter indications by tracking the high-order bit transitions of the counters. For example, if a task needs 10 input buffers and 20 output buffers then an input ports counter is initialized and maintained by tracking availability of the 10 allocated input buffers and 20 output buffers using simple increments and decrements according to high-order transitions of the buffer counter bits. When the high-order bit (i.e., the sign bit) of the ports counter transitions from a 1 to a 0, the associated task is ready to run.
In one embodiment the invention provides an apparatus for coordinating buffer use among tasks in a processing system, wherein the processing system includes a plurality of hardware nodes, wherein a task is executed on one or more of the hardware nodes, wherein a consuming task uses input buffers to obtain data and wherein a producing task uses output buffers to provide data, the apparatus comprising a task manager for indicating the status of the buffers, the task manager including an output buffer available indicator associated with an output buffer; an input buffer available indicator associated with an input buffer; and a status indicator for indicating that a task is ready to run based on a combination of the output buffer available indicator and the input buffer available indicator.
A detailed description of an ACE architecture used in a preferred embodiment is provided in the patents referenced above. The following section provides a summary of the ACE architecture described in the referenced patents.
Adaptive Computing Engine
In a preferred embodiment, the ACE 100 does not utilize traditional (and typically separate) data, DMA, random access, configuration and instruction busses for signaling and other transmission between and among the reconfigurable matrices 150, the controller 120, and the memory 140, or for other input/output (“I/O”) functionality. Rather, data, control and configuration information are transmitted between and among these matrix 150 elements, utilizing the matrix interconnection network 110, which may be configured and reconfigured, in real-time, to provide any given connection between and among the reconfigurable matrices 150, including those matrices 150 configured as the controller 120 and the memory 140.
The matrices 150 configured to function as memory 140 may be implemented in any desired or exemplary way, utilizing computational elements (discussed below) of fixed memory elements, and may be included within the ACE 100 or incorporated within another IC or portion of an IC. In the exemplary embodiment, the memory 140 is included within the ACE 100, and preferably is comprised of computational elements which are low power consumption random access memory (RAM), but also may be comprised of computational elements of any other form of memory, such as flash, DRAM, SRAM, MRAM, ROM, EPROM or E2PROM. In the exemplary embodiment, the memory 140 preferably includes direct memory access (DMA) engines, not separately illustrated.
The controller 120 is preferably implemented, using matrices 150A and 150B configured as adaptive finite state machines (FSMs), as a reduced instruction set (“RISC”) processor, controller or other device or IC capable of performing the two types of functionality discussed below. (Alternatively, these functions may be implemented utilizing a conventional RISC or other processor.) The first control functionality, referred to as “kernel” control, is illustrated as kernel controller (“KARC”) of matrix 150A, and the second control functionality, referred to as “matrix” control, is illustrated as matrix controller (“MARC”) of matrix 150B. The kernel and matrix control functions of the controller 120 are explained in greater detail below, with reference to the configurability and reconfigurability of the various matrices 150, and with reference to the exemplary form of combined data, configuration and control information referred to herein as a “silverware” module.
The matrix interconnection network 110 of
It should be pointed out, however, that while any given switching or selecting operation of, or within, the various interconnection networks may be implemented as known in the art, the design and layout of the various interconnection networks, in accordance with the present invention, are new and novel, as discussed in greater detail below. For example, varying levels of interconnection are provided to correspond to the varying levels of the matrices, computational units, and elements. At the matrix 150 level, in comparison with the prior art FPGA interconnect, the matrix interconnection network 110 is considerably more limited and less “rich”, with lesser connection capability in a given area, to reduce capacitance and increase speed of operation. Within a particular matrix or computational unit, however, the interconnection network may be considerably more dense and rich, to provide greater adaptation and reconfiguration capability within a narrow or close locality of reference.
The various matrices or nodes 150 are reconfigurable and heterogeneous, namely, in general, and depending upon the desired configuration: reconfigurable matrix 150A is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150B through 150N; reconfigurable matrix 150B is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150A and 150C through 150N; reconfigurable matrix 150C is generally different from reconfigurable matrices 150A, 150B and 150D through 150N, and so on. The various reconfigurable matrices 150 each generally contain a different or varied mix of adaptive and reconfigurable nodes, or computational units; the nodes, in turn, generally contain a different or varied mix of fixed, application specific computational components and elements that may be adaptively connected, configured and reconfigured in various ways to perform varied functions, through the various interconnection networks. In addition to varied internal configurations and reconfigurations, the various matrices 150 may be connected, configured and reconfigured at a higher level, with respect to each of the other matrices 150, through the matrix interconnection network 110. Details of the ACE architecture can be found in the related patent applications, referenced above.
Hardware Task Manager
In a preferred embodiment, each node wrapper includes a hardware task manager (HTM) 200. Node wrappers also include data distributor 202, optional direct memory access (DMA) engine 204 and data aggregator 206. The HTM coordinates execution, or use, of node processors and resources, respectively. The HTM does this by processing a task list and producing a ready-to-run queue. The HTM is configured and controlled by a specialized node referred to as a K-node or control node (not shown). However, other embodiment can use other HTM control approaches.
A task is an instance of a module, or group of instructions. A module can be any definition of processing, functionality or resource access to be provided by one or more nodes. A task is associated with a specific module on a specific node. A task definition includes designation of resources such as “physical” memory and “logical” input and output buffers and “logical” input and output ports of the module; and by initializing configuration parameters for the task. A task has four states: Suspend, Idle, Ready, Run.
A task is created by the K-node writing to control registers in the node where the task is being created, and by the K-node writing to control registers in other nodes, if any, that will be producing data for the task and/or consuming data from the task. These registers are memory mapped into the K-node's address space, and “peek and poke” network services are used to read and write these values.
A newly created task starts in the suspend state. Once a task is configured, the K-node can issue a “go” command, setting a bit in a control register. The action of this command is to move the task from the “suspend” state to the “idle” state.
When the task is “idle” and all its input buffers and output buffers are available, the task is ADDed to the ready-to-run queue which is implemented as a FIFO; and the task state is changed to “ready/run”.
Note: Buffers are available to the task when subsequent task execution will not consume more data than is present in its input buffer(s) or will not produce more data that there is capacity in its output buffer(s).
When the execution unit is not busy and the FIFO is not empty, the task number for the next task that is ready to execute is REMOVEd from the FIFO, and the state of this task is “run”. In the “run” state, the task consumes data from its input buffers and produces data for its output buffers. For PDU, RAU and RBU unit types, only one task can be in the “run” state at a time, and the current task cannot be preempted. These restrictions are imposed to simplify hardware and software control.
When the task completes processing:
The K-node can clear the task's GO bit at any time. When the task reaches the “idle” state and its GO bit is zero, its state will transition to “suspend”.
The K-node can determine if a task is hung in a loop by setting and testing status. When the K-node wishes to stop a run-away task, it should clear the task's GO bit and issue the “abort” command to reset the task's control unit. After reset, the task's state will transition to “idle”. And, if its GO bit has been cleared, its state will transition to “suspend”.
Task Lists
A node has a task list, and each task is identified by its “task number”. Associated with each task are the following:
Each task can have up to four input buffers. Associated with each input buffer are the following:
Each task can have up to four output buffers. Associated with each buffer is the following:
A preferred embodiment of the invention uses node task lists. Each list can designate up to 32 tasks. Each of the up to 32 tasks can have up to four input ports (read ports) and up to four output ports (write ports). A node can have 32 input ports and 32 output ports. 5-bit numbers are used to identify each port. Each number is associated with a 20-bit address in the contiguous address space for 1024 kilobytes of physical memory.
HTM Components
Port-to-Address Translation Table
Under K-node control, the execution units in each node can write into any memory location in the 20-bit contiguous address space. Accessing permissions are controlled by the port number-to-physical address translation tables. There are 32 entries in the table to support up to 32 ports at each node's input.
Each of the 32 ports at each node's input can be assigned to an output port of any task executing on any node (including “this node”) on the die. Each port number is associated with a “power-of-2” sized buffer within one or more of the node's physical memory blocks as shown in
The 20-bit contiguous address space is accessible by a 6-bit node number (the six high order bits) and a 14-bit (low order bits) byte address for the 16 KBytes within a tile.
Because network transfers are 32-bit transfers, 16-bit longword addresses are stored in the translation tables, and the two lower order address bits are inferred (and set to ‘00’ by each memory's address mux). The power-of-two buffer size is encoded in a four-bit value for each entry in the table as shown in
The translation table is loaded/updated by the K-node. When a task writes to this node, its output port number is used to access the table. Its accompanying data is written into the current address [ADDR] that is stored in the table, and the next address [NXTADDR] is calculated as follows:
Tasks communicate through buffers. Buffers are accessed via port numbers. Each active buffer is associated with a producer task and a consumer task. Each task maintains a count reflecting the amount of data in the buffer. As the producer writes data into the buffer, it updates its producer_counter with a value, Fwdackval, equal to the number of bytes that it has produced (written). It also updates the corresponding Consumer_count, using a FWDACK message if the consumer is remote (not in its node).
When the consumer reads, and no longer requires access to, data in the buffer, it updates its Consumer_count with a value, Bwdackval, equal to minus the number of bytes that is has consumed. It also updates the corresponding Producer_count, using a BWDACK message if the producer is remote.
Note: Data formats for the Forward and Backward Acknowledgement Messages are shown in
The ACKs processor includes a 64-entry by 16-bit LUT to store counts for each of its (up to) 32 input ports and 32 output ports. The format for this LUT is shown in
The counters are initialized with negative values by the K-node. Producer counters are accessed by their associated output port numbers; consumer counters are accessed by their associated input port numbers.
Producer counters are incremented by Fwdackvals from their associated tasks, and they are incremented by Bwdackvals from the downstream tasks that consume the data. Consumer counters are incremented by Bwdackvals from their associated tasks, and they are incremented by Fwdackvals from the upstream tasks that produce the data.
Note that incrementing by a Bwdackval, a negative value, is equivalent to decrementing by a positive value, producing a more negative result.
These operations are summarized in
An input buffer is available to its associated task when the high order bit of its consumer counter is clear, indicating a non-negative count. An input buffer is not available to its associated task when the bit is set, indicating a negative count. Consumer counters are initialized (by the K-node) with the negative number of bytes that must be in its input buffer before the associated task can execute. When the high order bit is clear, indicating buffer availability, the task is assured that the data it will consume during its execution is in the buffer.
An output buffer is available to its associated task when the high order bit of its producer counter is set, indicating a negative count. An output buffer is not available to its associated task when the bit is clear, indicating a non-negative count. Producer counters are initialized (by the K-node) with a negative number of bytes that it can produce before it must suspend task execution. An available output buffer indication assures the task that there is sufficient buffer capacity for execution with no possibility of overflow.
The initial values for these counters are functions of Ackvals and the desired numbers of task execution iterations after initialization.
To avoid deadlocks, the minimum buffer size must be the next power of two that exceeds the sum of the maximum absolute values of Fwdackvals and Bwdackvals. For example, for Fwdackval=51 and Bwdackval=−80, the buffer size must be greater than, or equal to, 256.
Counters are updated when ACKVAL messages arrive from the network and from locally executing tasks. When the high order bits of the current count and the updated count are different, a change of status indication is generated along with the associated task number, so that its STATE Ports_counter can be incremented or decremented. For input ports, the ports_counter is decremented for 0-to-1 transitions, and it is incremented for 1-to-0 transitions. For output ports, the ports_counter is incremented for 0-to-1 transitions, and it is decremented for 1-to-0 transitions.
When the high order bit of the Ports_counter transitions from 1 to 0, the associated task is ready to run; and it is ADDed to the Ready-to-Run Queue. Also, when the current task completes and its ACKs have been processed, if its GO bit is zero, its STATE is set to SUSPEND. Else, if its Ports_counter msb is clear, it is ready to run again; and, if the FIFO is empty, it runs again; or, if the FIFO is not empty, it is ADDed to the queue. Finally, if its GO bit is one, but its Ports_counter msb is clear, its STATE is set to IDLE; and it must wait for the next Ports_counter msb transition from 1 to 0 before it is once again ready to run and ADDed to the queue.
Ready-to-Run Queue
The Ready-to-Run Queue is a 32-entry by 5 bits per entry FIFO that stores the task numbers of all tasks that are ready to run. The K-node initializes the FIFO by setting its 5-bit write pointer (WP) and its 5-bit read pointer (RP) to zero. Initialization also sets the fifo status indication: EMPTY=1.
When a task is ready to run, its task number is ADDed to the queue at the location indicated by WP, and WP is incremented. For every ADD, EMPTY is set to 0.
When the execution unit is idle and the FIFO is not empty (EMPTY=0), the task number for the next task to be executed is REMOVEd from the queue at the location indicated by RP. When the task is completed, RP is incremented. And, if RP=WP, EMPTY is set to 1.
The FIFO is FULL when [(RP=WP) AND (EMPTY=0)].
State Information Table
State information for each of (up to) 32 tasks is maintained in a 32-entry by 6 bit table that is accessed by one of 32 task numbers. The format for this table is shown in
The State Information Table is initialized by the K-node (POKE). The K-node also can monitor the state of any task (PEEK). In addition to the K-node's unlimited access to the table, other accesses to it are controlled by a FSM that receives inputs from the ACKs Processor, the Ready-to-Run Queue, and the Execution Unit as shown in
Parms Pointers
Associated with each task is a register that contains the physical address where the first of the task's configuration parameters is stored in a contiguous chunk of memory.
Parms Memory
Each task's configuration parameters—or Module Parameter List (MPL),—are stored in a contiguous chunk of memory referenced by the task's Parms Pointer. The numbers of parameters and their purposes will vary from one task to another. As tasks are designed, their specific requirements for configuration parameters will be determined and documented.
Typically, these requirements will include:
Module—Pointer to the module used to implement this task. For reconfigurable hardware modules, this may be a number that corresponds to a specific module. For the PDU, this is the instruction memory address where the module begins.
For each of up to four buffers from which the task will consume (read) data:
For each of up to four buffers into which the task will produce (write) data:
For each presettable counter (for example: number of iterations count; watchdog count)
The layout for the Node Control Register is shown in
ENB—Bit 15—When the NCR Enable bit is clear, the node ceases all operation, except that it continues to support PEEK and POKE operations. The NCR Enable bit must be set to 1 to enable any other node functions.
ABT—Bit 14—Writing (POKING) the NCR with Bit 14 set to 1 generates an Abort signal to the execution unit, causing it to halt immediately, The state of the aborted task transitions to IDLE; and if its GO bit has been cleared (as it should be prior to issuing the Abort), the state will transition to SUSPEND. This is the K-node's sledge hammer to terminate a runaway task. Writing the NCR with Bit 14=0 is no operation. When reading (PEEKING) NCR, zero will be returned for Bit 14.
RSV—Bit 13—At this time, Bit 13 is unused. When writing the NCR, Bit 13 is don't care, and when reading NCR, zero will be returned for Bit 13.
WPE—Bit 12—Writing the NCR with Bit 12 set to 1 results in the writing of the [9:5] value into Queue Write Pointer (with ENB=0, a diagnostics WRITE/READ/CHECK capability). Writing the NCR with Bit 12=0 is no operation. When reading NCR, zero will be returned for Bit 12.
RPE—Bit 11—Writing the NCR with Bit 11 set to 1 results in the writing of the NCR[4:0] value into Queue Read Pointer (with ENB=0, a diagnostics WRITE/READ/CHECK capability). Writing the NCR with Bit 11=0 is no operation. When reading NCR, zero will be returned for Bit 11.
Queue Initialization
Writing the NCR with Bits 12 and 11 set to 1 and with Bits [9:5] and Bits [4:0] set to zeros initializes the queue, setting the Write Pointer to zero, the Read Pointer to zero, and the Queue Empty Status Flag to 1.
Queue Empty Status Flag—Bit 10—READ ONLY Bit 10, the Queue Empty Status Flag, is set to 1 when the Ready-to-Run FIFO is empty; it is set to 0 when it is not empty. When Bit 10 is set to 1, the Write Pointer (NCR [9:5]) and Read Pointer (NCR [4:0]) values will be the same. When the pointer values are the same, and Bit 10=0, the FIFO is FULL. When writing NCR, Bit 10 is don't care.
Queue Write Pointer—Bits [9:5]—For diagnostics WRITE/READ/CHECK capability (and for queue initialization), writing NCR with Bit 12=1 results in the writing of the NCR[9:5] value into Queue Write Pointer. When writing NCR with Bit 12=0, Bits [9:5] are don't care. When reading NCR, Bits [9:5] indicate the current Queue Write Pointer value.
Queue Read Pointer—Bits [4:0]—For diagnostics WRITE/READ/CHECK capability (and for queue initialization), writing NCR with Bit 11=1 results in the writing of the NCR[4:0] value into Queue Read Pointer. When writing NCR with Bit 11=0, Bits [4:0] are don't care. When reading NCR, Bits [4:0] indicate the current Queue Read Pointer value.
Node Status Register (NSR)
The layout for the Node Status Register is shown in
ENB—Bit 15—Bit 15, Enable, simply indicates the state of NCR [15]: Enable.
ABT—Bit 14—When an Abort command is issued (WRITE NCR, Bit 14=1), the executing task is suspended, after which the Abort Status Bit 14 is set to 1. Reading NSR clears Bit 14.
TCS—Bit 13—The Task Change Status Bit 13 is set to 1 when an execution unit REMOVEs a TASK # from the Ready-to-Run Queue. Reading NSR clears Bit 13. The K-node can perform a “watch dog” operation by reading NSR, which clears Bit 13, and reading NSR again after a time interval. After the second read, if Bit 13 is set to 1, another REMOVE (initiating execution of the next task) has occurred during the time interval. If Bit 13=0, another REMOVE has not occurred during the time interval.
NRS—Bit 12—This bit is set to 1 when the node is executing a task. When the bit=0, the node is not executing a task.
Reserved—Bits [11:5]—These bits are not assigned at this time, and reading the NSR results in zeros being returned for Bits [11:5]
Current Task Number—Bits [4:0]—Bits [4:0] is the 5-bit number (task number) associated with the task currently executing (if any).
Port/Memory Translation Table (PTT)
The layout for the 32-entry Port/Memory Translation Table (PTT) is shown in
Producers Counters Table (PCT); Consumers Counters Table (CCT)
The layouts for the 32-entry Producers Counters Table (PCT) and the 32-entry Consumers Counters Table (CCT) are shown in
Ready-to-Run Queue (RRQ)
The layout for the 32-entry Ready-to-Run Queue (RRQ) is shown in
Reserved—Bits [15:5]—These bits are not assigned at this time, and reading the RRQ results in zeros being returned for Bits [15:5].
Task Number—Bits [4:0]—The K-node can PEEK/POKE the 32-entry by 5-bit table for diagnostics purposes.
State Information Table (SIT)
The layout for the 32-entry State Information Table (SIT) is shown in
Prior to issuing an ABORT command, the K-node should clear the GO_bit of the task that is being aborted.
Bit 15, the GO_bit, is a READ/WRITE bit.
Bits [12:5] are unassigned at this time. For WRITE operations, they are don't care, and for READ operations, zeros will be returned for these fields.
When the SIT is written with Bit 13 (STATE Write Enable) set to 1, the STATE Bit for the associated task is set to the value indicated by Bit [14]. When Bit 13 is set to zero, there is no operation. For READ operations, the current STATE Bit for the associated task is returned for Bit [14], and a zero is returned for Bit 13.
When the SIT is written with Bit 4 (Ports_counter Write Enable) set to 1, the Ports_counter for the associated task is set to the value indicated by Bits [3:0]. When Bit 4 is set to zero, there is no operation. For READ operations, the current value of Ports_counter for the associated task is returned for Bits [3:0], and a zero is returned for Bit 4.
State transitions for a task are summarized in the table shown in
MDL Pointer Table (MPT)
The layout for the 32-entry Module Parameter List (MPL) Pointer Table (MPT) is shown in
Because there are unresolved issues associated with aggregating memories/tiles/tasks, we indicate a 16-bit memory pointer (assuming longword address boundaries) which would allow the task to access its configuration information from any memory within its quadrant.
Parms Memory Layouts
Each task's Module Parameter List (MPL) will be stored in a contiguous chunk of memory referenced by its associated Parms Pointer. The numbers of parameters and their purposes will vary from one task to another. As tasks are designed, their specific requirements for configuration parameters (and their associated layouts) will be determined and documented.
An example of packing eight parameters associated with each task buffer is shown in
Forward/Backward Acknowledgement Message Formats
Data formats for the Forward and Backward Acknowledgement Messages are shown in
Although the invention has been described with respect to specific embodiments, thereof, these embodiments are merely illustrative, and not restrictive of the invention. For example, any type of processing units, functional circuitry or collection of one or more units and/or resources such as memories, I/O elements, etc., can be included in a node. A node can be a simple register, or more complex, such as a digital signal processing system. Other types of networks or interconnection schemes than those described herein can be employed. It is possible that features or aspects of the present invention can be achieved in systems other than an adaptable system, such as described herein with respect to a preferred embodiment.
Thus, the scope of the invention is to be determined solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/331,741 filed Jul. 15, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/493,216 filed on Jun. 11, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,782,196, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/367,690 filed on Feb. 9, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,200,799 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/443,501 filed on May 21, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,653,710, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/391,874, filed on Jun. 25, 2002 entitled “DIGITAL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE FOR AN ADAPTIVE COMPUTING MACHINE”; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full in this document for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
RE30301 | Zygiel | Jun 1980 | E |
RE32179 | Sedam et al. | Jun 1986 | E |
4713755 | Worley, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719056 | Scott | Jan 1988 | A |
4726494 | Scott | Feb 1988 | A |
4747516 | Baker | May 1988 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4760525 | Webb | Jul 1988 | A |
4760544 | Lamb | Jul 1988 | A |
4765513 | McMillin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766548 | Cedrone et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781309 | Vogel | Nov 1988 | A |
4800492 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4811214 | Nosenchuck et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4824075 | Holzboog | Apr 1989 | A |
4827426 | Patton et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850269 | Hancock et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856684 | Gerstung | Aug 1989 | A |
4901887 | Burton | Feb 1990 | A |
4921315 | Metcalfe et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930666 | Rudick | Jun 1990 | A |
4932564 | Austin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936488 | Austin | Jun 1990 | A |
4937019 | Scott | Jun 1990 | A |
4960261 | Scott et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961533 | Teller et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967340 | Dawes | Oct 1990 | A |
4974643 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4982876 | Scott | Jan 1991 | A |
4993604 | Gaunt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007560 | Sassak | Apr 1991 | A |
5021947 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5040106 | Maag | Aug 1991 | A |
5044171 | Farkas | Sep 1991 | A |
5090015 | Dabbish et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5129549 | Austin | Jul 1992 | A |
5139708 | Scott | Aug 1992 | A |
5156301 | Hassell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156871 | Goulet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165575 | Scott | Nov 1992 | A |
5190083 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5190189 | Zimmer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193151 | Jain | Mar 1993 | A |
5193718 | Hassell et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202993 | Tarsy et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203474 | Haynes | Apr 1993 | A |
5240144 | Feldman | Aug 1993 | A |
5261099 | Bigo et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263509 | Cherry et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269442 | Vogel | Dec 1993 | A |
5280711 | Motta et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297400 | Benton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301100 | Wagner | Apr 1994 | A |
5303846 | Shannon | Apr 1994 | A |
5335276 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339428 | Burmeister et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343716 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361362 | Benkeser et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368198 | Goulet | Nov 1994 | A |
5379343 | Grube et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381546 | Servi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381550 | Jourdenais et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388212 | Grube et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392960 | Kendt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5437395 | Bull et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450557 | Kopp et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454406 | Rejret et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465368 | Davidson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479055 | Eccles | Dec 1995 | A |
5490165 | Blakeney, II et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491823 | Ruttenberg | Feb 1996 | A |
5507009 | Grube et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515519 | Yoshioka et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517600 | Shimokawa | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522070 | Sumimoto | May 1996 | A |
5530964 | Alpert et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534796 | Edwards | Jul 1996 | A |
5542265 | Rutland | Aug 1996 | A |
5553755 | Bonewald et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555417 | Odnert et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560028 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560038 | Haddock | Sep 1996 | A |
5570587 | Kim | Nov 1996 | A |
5572572 | Kawan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590353 | Sakakibara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594657 | Cantone et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600810 | Ohkami | Feb 1997 | A |
5600844 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602833 | Zehavi | Feb 1997 | A |
5603043 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607083 | Vogel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608643 | Wichter et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611867 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623545 | Childs et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625669 | McGregor et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626407 | Westcott | May 1997 | A |
5630206 | Urban et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635940 | Hickman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646544 | Iadanza | Jul 1997 | A |
5646545 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647512 | Assis Mascarenhas deOliveira et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5667110 | McCann et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684793 | Kiema et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684980 | Casselman | Nov 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694613 | Suzuki | Dec 1997 | A |
5694794 | Jerg et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699328 | Ishizaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701482 | Harrison et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704053 | Santhanam | Dec 1997 | A |
5706191 | Bassett et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706976 | Purkey | Jan 1998 | A |
5712996 | Schepers | Jan 1998 | A |
5720002 | Wang | Feb 1998 | A |
5721693 | Song | Feb 1998 | A |
5721854 | Ebicioglu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732563 | Bethuy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734808 | Takeda | Mar 1998 | A |
5737631 | Trimberger | Apr 1998 | A |
5742180 | DeHon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742821 | Prasanna | Apr 1998 | A |
5745366 | Highma et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35780 | Hassell et al. | May 1998 | E |
5751295 | Becklund et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754227 | Fukuoka | May 1998 | A |
5758261 | Weideman | May 1998 | A |
5768561 | Wise | Jun 1998 | A |
5778439 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784636 | Rupp | Jul 1998 | A |
5787237 | Reilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5790817 | Asghar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791517 | Avital | Aug 1998 | A |
5791523 | Oh | Aug 1998 | A |
5794062 | Baxter | Aug 1998 | A |
5794067 | Kadowaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5802055 | Krein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818603 | Motoyama | Oct 1998 | A |
5822308 | Weigand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822313 | Malek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822360 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828858 | Athanas et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829085 | Jerg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835753 | Witt | Nov 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5845815 | Vogel | Dec 1998 | A |
5860021 | Klingman | Jan 1999 | A |
5862961 | Motta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870427 | Teidemann, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873045 | Lee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881106 | Cartier | Mar 1999 | A |
5884284 | Peters et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886537 | Macias et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887174 | Simons et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889816 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890014 | Long | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892961 | Trimberger | Apr 1999 | A |
5894473 | Dent | Apr 1999 | A |
5901884 | Goulet et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903886 | Heimlich et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907285 | Toms et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907580 | Cummings | May 1999 | A |
5910733 | Bertolet et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912572 | Graf, III | Jun 1999 | A |
5913172 | McCabe et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917852 | Butterfield et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920801 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931918 | Row et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933642 | Greenbaum et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940438 | Poon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949415 | Lin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950011 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950131 | Vilmur | Sep 1999 | A |
5951674 | Moreno | Sep 1999 | A |
5953322 | Kimball | Sep 1999 | A |
5956518 | DeHon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956967 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5959811 | Richardson | Sep 1999 | A |
5959881 | Trimberger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963048 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966534 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970254 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987105 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
5991302 | Berl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991308 | Fuhrmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993739 | Lyon | Nov 1999 | A |
5999734 | Willis et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005943 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006249 | Leong | Dec 1999 | A |
6016395 | Mohamed | Jan 2000 | A |
6021186 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021492 | May | Feb 2000 | A |
6023742 | Ebeling et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023755 | Casselman | Feb 2000 | A |
6028610 | Deering | Feb 2000 | A |
6036166 | Olson | Mar 2000 | A |
6039219 | Bach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041322 | Meng et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041970 | Vogel | Mar 2000 | A |
6046603 | New | Apr 2000 | A |
6047115 | Mohan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052600 | Fette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056194 | Kolls | May 2000 | A |
6059840 | Click, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6061580 | Altschul et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073132 | Gehman | Jun 2000 | A |
6076174 | Freund | Jun 2000 | A |
6078736 | Guccione | Jun 2000 | A |
6085740 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088043 | Kelleher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091263 | New et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091765 | Pietzold, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094065 | Tavana et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094726 | Gonion et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsun et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111935 | Hughes-Hartogs | Aug 2000 | A |
6115751 | Tam et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120551 | Law et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122670 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128307 | Brown | Oct 2000 | A |
6138693 | Matz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141283 | Bogin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150838 | Wittig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154494 | Sugahara et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157997 | Oowaki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175854 | Bretscher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175892 | Sazzad et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181981 | Varga et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185418 | MacLellan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192255 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192388 | Cajolet | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195788 | Leaver et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198924 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199181 | Rechef et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202130 | Scales, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219697 | Lawande et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219756 | Kasamizugami | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219780 | Lipasti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223222 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226387 | Tewfik et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230307 | Davis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237029 | Master et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246883 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247125 | Noel-Baron et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249251 | Chang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258725 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263057 | Silverman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266760 | DeHon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272579 | Lentz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281703 | Furuta et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282627 | Wong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289375 | Knight et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289434 | Roy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289488 | Dave et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292822 | Hardwick | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292830 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301653 | Mohamed et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305014 | Roediger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311149 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321985 | Kolls | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346824 | New | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347346 | Taylor | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349394 | Brock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353841 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356863 | Sayle | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356994 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359248 | Mardi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360256 | Lim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360259 | Bradley | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360263 | Kurtzberg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366999 | Drabenstott et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377983 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378072 | Collins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381735 | Hunt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385751 | Wolf | May 2002 | B1 |
6405214 | Meade, II | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408039 | Ito | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411612 | Halford et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421372 | Bierly et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421809 | Wuytack et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430624 | Jamtgaard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433578 | Wasson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434590 | Blelloch et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438737 | Morelli et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456996 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459883 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473609 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507947 | Schreiber et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510138 | Pannell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510510 | Garde | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538470 | Langhammer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556044 | Langhammer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563891 | Eriksson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570877 | Kloth et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577678 | Scheuermann | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587684 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590415 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601086 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601158 | Abbott et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604085 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606529 | Crowder, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615333 | Hoogerbrugge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618434 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640304 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653859 | Sihlbom et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675265 | Barroso et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691148 | Zinky et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711617 | Bantz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718182 | Kung | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721286 | Williams et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721884 | De Oliveira Kastrup Pereira et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732354 | Ebeling et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735621 | Yoakum et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738744 | Kirovski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748360 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760587 | Holtzman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766165 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778212 | Deng et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785341 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819140 | Yamanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823448 | Roth et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829633 | Gelfer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832250 | Coons et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836839 | Master et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6865664 | Budrovic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871236 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883084 | Donohoe | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894996 | Lee | May 2005 | B2 |
6901440 | Bimm et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6912515 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6985517 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986021 | Master et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988139 | Jervis et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7032229 | Flores et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7044741 | Leem | May 2006 | B2 |
7082456 | Mani-Meitav et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7139910 | Ainsworth et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7142731 | Toi | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7249242 | Ramchandran | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7433909 | Scheuermann | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7620678 | Master | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7653710 | Scheuermann | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8200799 | Scheuermann | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8782196 | Scheuermann | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9665397 | Scheuermann | May 2017 | B2 |
20010003191 | Kovacs et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023482 | Wray | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029515 | Mirsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034795 | Moulton et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039654 | Miyamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048713 | Medlock et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010048714 | Jha | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050948 | Ramberg et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010848 | Kamano et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013799 | Blaker | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013937 | Ostanevich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015435 | Rieken | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020015439 | Kohli et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023210 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024942 | Tsuneki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024993 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031166 | Subramanian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032551 | Zakiya | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035623 | Lawande et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041581 | Aramaki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042907 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061741 | Leung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069282 | Reisman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072830 | Hunt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078337 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083305 | Renard et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083423 | Ostanevich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087829 | Snyder et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089348 | Langhammer | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101909 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107905 | Roe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107962 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119803 | Bitterlich et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120672 | Butt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138716 | Master et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141489 | Imaizumi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159503 | Ramachandran | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162026 | Neuman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168018 | Scheuermann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181559 | Heidari-Bateni et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184291 | Hogenauer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184498 | Qi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191790 | Anand et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007606 | Suder et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012270 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018446 | Makowski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018700 | Giroti et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023830 | Hogenauer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026242 | Jokinen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030004 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046421 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061260 | Rajkumar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061311 | Lo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063656 | Rao et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076815 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099223 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102889 | Master et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105949 | Master | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110485 | Lu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142818 | Raghunathan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154357 | Master et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163507 | Chang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163723 | Kozuch et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172138 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172139 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200538 | Ebeling et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212684 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006584 | Vandeweerd | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010645 | Scheuermann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015970 | Scheuermann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025159 | Scheuermann et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057505 | Valio | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062300 | McDonough et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081248 | Parolari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093479 | Ramchandran | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168044 | Ramchandran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050166038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198199 | Dowling | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060031660 | Master et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090282408 | Joffe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 18 374 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0 301 169 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 166 586 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 236 633 | May 1991 | EP |
0 478 624 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 479 102 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 661 831 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 668 659 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 690 588 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 691 754 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 768 602 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 817 003 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 821 495 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 866 210 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 923 247 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 926 596 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 056 217 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 061 437 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 443 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 126 368 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 150 506 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 189 358 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2 067 800 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 237 908 | May 1991 | GB |
62-249456 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-147258 | Jun 1988 | JP |
4-51546 | Feb 1992 | JP |
7-064789 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7066718 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10233676 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10254696 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11296345 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000315731 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-053703 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 8905029 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 8911443 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9100238 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9313603 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9511855 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9633558 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9832071 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9903776 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9921094 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9926860 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9965818 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0019311 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0065855 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0069073 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0111281 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0122235 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0176129 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0212978 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abnoet al., “Ultra-Low-Power Domain-Specific Multimedia Processors,” VLSI Signal Processing, IX, 1998, IEEE Workshop in San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 461-470 (Oct. 30, 1998). |
Aggarwal et al.., “Efficient Huffman Decoding,” International Conference on Image Processing IEEE 1:936-939 (Sep. 10-13, 2000). |
Allan et al., “Software Pipelining,” ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3):1-78 (Sep. 1995). |
Alsolaim et al., “Architecture and Application of a Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Array for Future Mobile Communication Systems,” Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines, 2000 IEEE Symposium, Napa Valley, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 205-214 (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Ashenden et al., “The VHDL Cookbook,” Dept. Computer Science, University of Adelaide, South Australia. Downloaded from http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/doc/cookbook/VHDL-Cookbook.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Jul. 1990). |
Bacon et al., “Compiler Transformations for High-Performance Computing,” ACM Computing Surveys 26(4):368-373 (Dec. 1994). |
Balasubramonian et al., “Reducing the Complexity of the Register File in Dynamic Superscalar Processors,” Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 237-248 (Dec. 1, 2001). |
Banerjee et al., “A MATLAB Compiler for Distributed, Heterogeneous, Reconfigurable Computing Systems,” 2000 IEEE Symposium, pp. 39-48, (Apr. 17-19, 2000). |
Bapte, et al., “Uniform Execution Environment for Dynamic Reconfiguration,” Darpa Adaptive Computing Systems, http://isis.vanderbilt.edu/publications/archive/babty_T_#_0_1999_Uniform_Ex.pdf, pp. 1-7 (1999). |
Baumgarte et al., “PACT XPP—A Self-Reconfigurable Data Processing Architecture,” NN www.pactcorp.com/sneu/download/ersa01.pdf; retrieved on Nov. 25, 2005 (Jun. 25, 2001). |
Becker et al., “An Application-Tailored Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for Digital Baseband Processing,” IEEE Conference Proceedings Article pp. 341-346 (Sep. 18, 2000). |
Becker et al., “Design and Implementation of a Coarse-Grained Dynamically Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture,” VLSI 2001, Proceedings IEEE Computer Soc. Workshop, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 41-46 (Apr. 19-20, 2001). |
BevStar, BevStar Bottled Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005). |
BevStar, BevStar Point of Use Water Model Advertisement Automatic Merchandiser at www.AMonline.com (2005). |
Bishop & Loucks, “A HeterogeneoEnvironment for Hardware/Software Cosimulation,” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Simulation Symposium, pp. 14-22 (Apr. 7-9, 1997). |
Brakensiek et al., “Re-Configurable Multi-Standard Terminal for HeterogeneoNetworks,” Radio and Wireless Conference, Rawcon 2002 IEEE. pp. 27-30 (2002). |
Brown et al., “Quick PDA Data Exchange,” PC Magazine pp. 1-3 (May 22, 2001). |
Buck et al., “Ptolemy: A Framework for Simulating and Prototyping HeterogeneoSystems,” International Journal of Computer Simulation 4:155-182 (Apr. 1994). |
Burns et al., “A Dynamic Reconfiguration Run-Time System,” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines, pp. 166-175 (Apr. 16, 1997). |
Business Wire, “Whirlpool Internet-Enabled Appliances to Use Beeline Shopper Software Features,” http://www.whirlpoocorp.com/news/releases/release.asp?rid=90 (Feb. 16, 2001). |
Buttazzo et al., “Optimal Deadline Assignment for Scheduling Soft Aperiodic Tasks in Hard Real-Time Environments,” Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Como, pp. 39-48 (Sep. 8, 1997). |
Callahan et al., “Adapting Software Pipelining for Reconfigurable Computing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architectrue and Synthesis for Embedded Systems p. 8, ACM (Cases '00, San Jose, CA) (Nov. 17-18, 2000). |
Chapman & Mehrotra, “OpenMP and HPF: Integrating Two Paradigms,” Proceedings of the 4th International Euro-Par Conference (Euro-Par'98), Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1470:650-658 (1998). |
Chen et al., “A Reconfigurable Multiprocessor IC for Rapid Prototyping of Algorithmic-Specific High-Speed DSP Data Paths,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE 35:74-75 (Feb. 1, 2001). |
Clarke, “Embedded Solutions Enters Development Pact with Marconi,” EETimes Online (Jan. 26, 2000). |
Compton & Hauck, “Reconfigurable Computing: A Survey of Systems and Software,” ACM Press, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 34(2):171-210 (Jun. 2002). |
Compton et al., “Configuration Relocation and Defragmentation for Run-Time Reconfigurable Computing,” Northwestern University, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/compton00configuration.html, pp. 1-17 (2000). |
Conte et al., “Dynamic Rescheduling: A Technique for Object Code Compatibility in VLIW Architectures,” Proceedings of the 28th Annulal International Symposium on Microarchitecture pp. 208-218 (Nov. 29, 1995). |
Conte et al., “Instruction Fetch Mechanisms for VLIW Architectures with Compressed Encodings,” Proceedings of the Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) 29:201-211 (Dec. 2, 1996). |
Cray Research Inc., “Cray T3E Fortran Optimization Guide,” Ver. 004-2518-002, Section 4.5 (Jan. 1999). |
Cummings et al., “FPGA in the Software Radio,” IEEE Communications Magazine . 37(2):108-112 (Feb. 1999). |
Dandalis et al., “An Adaptive Cryptograhic Engine for IPSec Architectures,” IEEE pp. 132-141 (Jan. 2000). |
David et al., “DART: A Dynamically Reconfigurable Architecture Dealing with Future Mobile Telecommunication Constraints,” Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium pp. 156-163 (Apr. 15, 2002). |
Deepakumara et al., “FPGA Implementation of MD5 has Algorithm,” Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, IEEE (2001). |
Dehon et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: What, Why and Implications for Design Automation,” Design Automation Conference Proceedings pp. 610-615 (1999). |
Dipert, “Figuring Out Reconfigurable Logic,” EDN 44(16):107-114 (Aug. 5, 1999). |
Dominikus, “A Hardware Implementation of MD4-Family Hash Algorithms,” 9th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems IEEE (2002). |
Dorband, “aCe C Language Reference Guide,” Online (Archived Mar. 2001), http://web.archive.org/web/20000616053819/http://newton.gsfc.nasa.gov/aCe/aCe_dir/aCe_cc_Ref. html (Mar. 2001). |
Drozdowski, “Scheduling Multiprocessor Tasks—An Overview,” Instytut Informatyki Politechnika, pp. 1-31 (Jan. 31, 1996). |
Ebeling et al., “RaPiD Reconfigurable Pipelined Datapath,” Springer-Verlag, 6th International Workshop on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications pp. 126-135 (1996). |
Fawer et al., “A Multiprocessor Approach for Implementing a Time-Diversity Spread Specturm Receiver,” Proceeding sof the 1990 International Zurich Seminal on Digital Communications, pp. 173-180 (Mar. 5-8, 1990). |
Fisher, “Gone Flat,” Forbes pp. 76-79 (Oct. 2001). |
Fleischmann et al., “Prototyping Networked Embedded Systems,” Integrated Engineering, pp. 116-119 (Feb. 1999). |
Forbes “Best of the Web—Computer Networking/Consumer Durables,” The Forbes Magnetic 40 p. 80 (May 2001). |
Gibson, “Fresh Technologies Will Create Myriad Functions,” FT Information Technology Review; World Wide Web at http://technews.acm.org/articles/2000-2/0301w.html?searchterm=%22fresh+technologies%22 (Mar. 1, 2000). |
Gluth, “Integrierte Signalprozessoren,” Elektronik 35(18):112-118 Franzis Verlag GMBH, Munich, Germany (Sep. 5, 1986). |
Gokhale & Schlesinger, “A Data Parallel C and Its Platforms,” Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 194-202 (Frontiers '95) (Feb. 1995). |
Grimm et al., “A System Architecture for Pervasive Computing,” Washington University, pp. 1-6 (Sep. 2000). |
Halbwachs et al., “The SynchronoData Flow Programming Language LUSTRE,” Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9):1305-1319 (Sep. 1991). |
Hammes et al., “Cameron: High Level Language Compilation for Reconfigurable Systems,” Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp. 236-244 (Oct. 1999). |
Hartenstein, “Coarse Grain Reconfigurable Architectures,” Design Automation Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the ASP-Dac 2001, Asian and South Pacific Jan. 30, 2001-Feb. 2, 2001, Piscataway, NJ, US, IEEE, pp. 564-569 (Jan. 30, 2001). |
Heinz, “An Efficiently Compilable Extension of {M}odula-3 for Problem-Oriented Explicitly Parallel Programming,” Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Parallel Processing (May 1993). |
Hinden et al., “The DARPA Internet: Interconnecting HeterogeneoComputer Networks with Gateways,” IEEE Computer Magazine pp. 38-48 (1983). |
Horton, “Beginning Java 2: JDK 1.3 Edition,” Wrox Press, Chapter 8, pp. 313-316 (Feb. 2001). |
Huff et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling,” 6th Conference on Programming Language, Design and Implementation, pp. 258-267, ACM (1993). |
IBM, “Multisequencing a Single Instruction Stream Scheduling with Space-time Trade-offs,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 36(2):105-108 (Feb. 1, 1993). |
IEEE, “IEEE Standard Verilog Hardware Description Language,” downloaded from http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/˜cs150/fa06/Labs/verilog-ieee.pdf on Dec. 7, 2006 (Sep. 2001). |
Internet Wire, Sunbeam Joins Microsoft in University Plug and Play Forum to Establish A “Universal” Smart Appliance Technology Standard (Mar. 23, 2000). |
Ishii et al., “Parallel Variable Length Decoding with Inverse Quantization for Software MPEG-2 Decoders,” Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Design and Implementation, IEEE pp. 500-509 (Nov. 3-5, 1997). |
Isoworth, “Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide Company,” Brochure (May 22, 2000). |
Jain et al., “An Alternative Approach Towards the Design of Control Units,” Microelectronics and Reliability 24(6):1009-1012 (1984). |
Jain, “Parallel Processing with the TMS320C40 Parallel Digital Signal Processor,” Sonitech International Inc., pp. 13-46. Retrieved from: http://www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/spra031/spra031.pdf retrieved on Apr. 14, 2004 (Feb. 1994). |
Janssen et al., “Partitioned Register File for TTAs,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 303-312 (Nov. 1995). |
Jong-Pyng et al., “Real-Time Virtual Channel Flow Control,” Proceedings of the Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Conf. 13, pp. 97-103 (Apr. 12, 1994). |
Jung et al., “Efficient Hardware Controller Synthesis for SynchronoDataflow Graph in System Level Design,” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on System Synthesis pp. 79-84 (ISSS'00) (Sep. 2000). |
Kaufmann et al., “Digital Spread-Spectrum Multipath-Diversity Receiver for Indoor Communication,” from Pioneers to the 21st Century; Denver, Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Socity [sic] Conference, NY, IEEE, 2(Conf. 42):1038-1041 (May 10-13, 1992). |
Kneip et al., “An Algorithm Adapted AutonomoControlling Concept for a Parallel Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, an dVideo Technology 16(1):31-40 (May 1, 1997). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “Pipeline Interleaved Programmable DSP's: SynchronoData Flow Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP-35(9):1334-1345 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Messerschmitt, “SynchronoData Flow,” Proceedings of the IEEE 75(9):1235-1245 (Sep. 1987). |
Lee & Parks, “Dataflow Process Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE 83(5):773-799 (May 1995). |
Liu et al., “Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment,” Journal of the Association for Computing 20(0:46-61 (1973). |
Llosa et al., “Lifetime-Sensitive Modulo Scheduling in a Production Environment,” IEEE Trans. on Comps. 50(3):234-249 (Mar. 2001). |
Lu et al., “The Morphosys Dynamically Reconfigurable System-On-Chip,” Proceedings of the First NASA/DOD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware, pp. 152-160 (Jul. 19, 1999). |
Mangione-Smith et al., “Seeking Solutions in Configurable Computing,” Computer 30(12):38-43 (Dec. 1997). |
Manion, “Network CPU Adds Spice,” Electronic Engineering Times, Issue 1126 (Aug. 14, 2000). |
Mascia & Ishii., “Neural Net Implementation on Single-Chip Digital Signal Processor,” IEEE (1989). |
McGraw, “Parallel Functional Programming in Sisal: Fictions, Facts, and Future,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory pp. 1-40 (Jul. 1993). |
Najjar et al., “High-Level Language Abstraction for Reconfigurable Computing,” Computer 36(8):63-69 (Aug. 2003). |
Nichols et al., “Data Management and Control-Flow Constructs in a SIMD/SPMD Parallel Language/Compiler,” Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation pp. 397-406 (Oct. 1990). |
OpenMP Architecture Review Board, “OpenMP C and C++ Application Program Interface,” pp. 7-16 (Oct. 1998). |
Oracle Corporation, “Oracle8i JDBC Developer's Guide and Reference,” Release 3, 8.1.7, pp. 10-8-10-10 (Jul. 2000). |
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems: Further Results,” Proc. IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), Napa CA (1999). |
Pauer et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Presentation slides, Third Bi-annual Ptolemy Miniconference (1999). |
Ramamritham et al., “On Scheduling Algorithms for Real-Time Multiprocessor Systems,” Algorithms and Applications, Proceedings of the International conference on Parallel Processing 3:143-152 (Aug. 8, 1989). |
Schneider, “A Parallel/Serial Trade-Off Methodology for Look-Up Table Based Decoders,” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference 34:498-503 (Jun. 9-13, 1997). |
Sidhu et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Gate Array Architecture,” 10 International Workshop on Field Programmable Logic and Applications http://coblitz.codeen.org:3125/citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/17524/http:zSzzSzmaarcii.usc.eduzSzPublicationsZSzsidhu_fp100.pdf/sidhu00selfreconfigurable.pdf retrieved on Jun. 21, 2006 (Sep. 1, 2001). |
Smith, “Intro to ASICs: ASIC Cell Libraries,” at http://iroi.seu.edu.cn/books/asics/Book2/CH01/CH01.5.htm, printed on Feb. 4, 2005 (Jun. 1997). |
Souza, “Computing's New Face—Reconfigurable Devices Could Rattle Supply Chain,” Electronic Buyers' News Issue 1205, p. P.1 (Apr. 3, 2000). |
Souza, “Quicksilver Buys White Eagle,” Electronic Buyers' News, Issue 1220 (Jul. 17, 2000). |
Sriram et al., “MPEG-2 Video Decoding of the TMS320C6X DSP Architecture,” Conference Record of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE pp. 1735-1739 (Nov. 1-4, 1998). |
Steiner, “Coke Chief's Latest Daft Idea—A Cola Tap in Every House,” Sunday Times (Mar. 2001). |
Sun Microsystems, “Fortran 3.0.1 User's Guide, Revision A,” pp. 57-68 (Aug. 1994). |
Svensson, “Co's Join on Home Web Wiring Network,” Associated Press Online printed on Apr. 30, 2008 (Jun. 2000). |
Tang et al., “Thread Partitioning and Scheduling Based on Cost Model,” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 272-281 Retrieved from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258492.2585 retrieved on Aug. 25, 2004 (1997). |
Vaya, “VITURBO: A Reconfigurable Architecture for UbiquitoWireless Networks,” A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science; Rice University (Aug. 2002). |
Wang et al., “Cell Search in W-CDMA,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 18(8):1470-1482 (Aug. 2000). |
Wardell, “Help for Hurried Cooks?,” Popular Science, p. 32 (May 2000). |
Whiting & Pascoe, “A History of Data-Flow Languages,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 16(4):38-59 (1994). |
Williamson & Lee, “Synthesis of Parallel Hardware Implementations from SynchronoDataflow Graph Specifications,” Conference Record of the Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 1340-1343 (Nov. 1996). |
Wirthlin et al., “A Dynamic Instruction Set Computer,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on FPGA's for Custom Computing Machines, pp. 99-107 (Apr. 21, 1995). |
www.appliancemagazine.com, World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000511085402/http://www.appliancemagazine.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bestrom.com, BreakMateTM from www.bestrom.com printed on Apr. 29, 2008. |
www.beverageexpress.com, Beverage Express from www.beverageexpress.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bevstar.com, Isoworth Beverage Dispensing Technology Worldwide from www.bevstar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.bonator.com, from the World Wide Web at http://web.archive.org/web/20000510102440/http://www.bonator.com/ printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com, Swiss Mountain Coffees from www.ecommerce.dewpointinc.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.gateway.com, World Wide Web, http://web.archive.org/web/20000229192734/www.gateway.com/productpages/9300splash/index.shtml Available on Mar. 3, 2000, 1 page (Mar. 3, 2000). |
www.icl.com, from the World Wide Web at http://www.icl.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.margherita2000.com; from Margherita2000.com printed Apr. 30, 2008 (Jan. 26, 2001). |
www.sodaclubenterprises.com, Soda-Club Enterprises from www.sodaclubenterprises.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.symbol.com, Symbol from www.symbol.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
www.wunderbar.com, Wunder-Bar Dispensing Systems from www.wunderbar.com printed on Apr. 30, 2008. |
X1LINX, “Virtex-II Pro Platform FPGAs: Functional Description DS083-2 (v2.5),” Product Specification, pp. 13-46 (Jan. 20, 2003). |
Young, “Architecture Powers up IPSec, SSL,” EETimes, Los Gatos, CA, pp. 1-4 http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011102S0065 (Nov. 2, 2001). |
Yuan et al., “A Decomposition Approach to Non-Preemptive Real-Time Scheduling,” Real Time Systems 6(1):7-35 (1994). |
Zaino et al., “Algorithm Analysis and Mapping Environment for Adaptive Computing Systems,” Final Technical Report, DARPA Contract F33615-97-C-1174 (Sep. 2001). |
Zhang et al., “A 1V HeterogeneoReconfigurable Processor IC for Baseband Wireless Applications,” 2000 IEEE Solid. |
Tredennick, “The Death of the DSP,” 10 pps. (Aug. 17, 2000). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170262193 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60391874 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14331741 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15605378 | US | |
Parent | 13493216 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14331741 | US | |
Parent | 12367690 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13493216 | US | |
Parent | 10443501 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 12367690 | US |