The present invention pertains to transporters and methods for transporting a load, which may be a living subject, and more particularly to controlling motion of a transporter.
A wide range of vehicles having a motorized drive arrangement are known for conveying various subjects, either for purposive locomotion or for recreational purposes. The means used to command the motorized drive arrangement of these vehicles varies greatly. For example, an operator may manipulate an accelerator pedal to control forward motion of an automobile, while steering is typically performed using a steering wheel. Or the motion of a sporting vehicle may be controlled by rocking a foot board upon which a user is balanced towards the front or rear to mechanically move a throttle cable, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,790,548 (Francken). Based on the operator's physical attributes for example, or the transporter's intended functionality, alternative methods for controlling motion of a transporter may be desirable.
In a first embodiment of the invention there is provided a transporter for transporting a load over a surface. The transporter includes a support platform for supporting the load. The support platform is characterized by a fore-aft axis, a lateral axis, and an orientation with respect to the surface, the orientation referred to as an attitude. At least one ground-contacting element, which is driven by a motorized drive arrangement, is coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation. A sensor module generates a signal characterizing the attitude of the support platform. Based on the attitude, a controller commands the motorized drive arrangement.
In accordance with related embodiments of the invention, one or more ground-contacting elements may be flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a position of a center of mass of the load relative to the at least one ground-contacting element.
The sensor module may include at least one distance sensor for measuring a distance characteristic of the attitude of the platform. The distance sensor may be selected from the group of distance sensors consisting of an ultrasonic distance sensor, an acoustic distance sensor, a radar distance sensor, optical distance sensor, and a contact sensor, such as a whisker(s). The at least one distance sensor may sense the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and a position on the surface disposed at a specified angle with respect to the support platform. In other embodiments, the transporter may include a first component that remains in a substantially fixed vertical position relative to the surface, wherein the at least one distance sensor senses the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and the first component. One or more ground contacting elements may include a wheel having an axle, and the first component is fixed relative to the axle. Alternatively, and not meant to be limiting, one or more ground contacting elements may include a wheel supported by a frame, and the first component is fixed relative to the frame.
In accordance with other related embodiments of the invention, the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based at least on a signal generated by a remote control device. The transporter may include a powered strut coupled to the platform, the powered strut capable of varying the attitude of the support platform based at least on the signal generated by the remote control device. The transporter may further include a user interface, wherein the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a signal generated by the user interface. The controller may command motion of the transporter in the fore-aft plane and/or the lateral plane.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling a transporter having a support platform for supporting a load is presented. The support platform is characterized by an attitude with respect to the surface. The transporter includes at least one ground contacting elements flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the platform is capable of variation. The transporter also includes a motorized drive arrangement for driving the at least one ground contacting elements. The method includes generating a signal characterizing an attitude of the support platform. The motorized drive arrangement is commanded based at least on the attitude.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention,
One or more ground-contacting elements 2, 7 provide contact between support platform 11 and the ground. Ground-contacting elements 2, 7 may include, but are not limited to, arcuate members, tracks, treads, and wheels (hereinafter the term “wheel” will be used in the specification to refer to any such ground-contacting element without limitation). While the transporter 1 depicted in
Support platform 11 may be flexibly coupled to the wheels 2, 7 by various means known in the art, for example, a pivot mechanism, springs, or pneumatic pistons. In other embodiments, the wheels 2, 7 may have some compliance and serve the function of a spring. For purposes of the present description, platform 11 may be characterized by a fore-aft axis, a lateral axis, and an orientation with respect to the surface, which is referred to herein as an attitude. The fore-aft axis, X-X, is perpendicular to the wheel axis, while the lateral axis, Y-Y, is parallel to the axis of the wheels. Directions parallel to the axes X-X and Y-Y are called the fore-aft and lateral directions respectively.
Referring now to
The motion of transporter 10 is based, at least in part, on the attitude of the support platform 11. To determine the attitude of the support platform 11, transporter 10 includes a sensor module. Sensor module may include at least one distance sensor 17, 18 for measuring a distance characteristic of the attitude of the support platform 11. The distance measured may be, for example, the distance between a fiducial point on the support platform 11 and a surface 19, or alternatively, another component on transporter 10. A plurality of distances measured by the sensor module may be combined to generate at least one signal characteristic of the platform attitude.
Attitude/distance sensor may be one of many sensor types, such as, for example, an ultrasonic, optical, acoustic or radar sensor wherein a signal generated by a source is reflected back by a surface to a sensor receiver. The distance from the sensor to the surface can then be calculated based on the time (or phase) difference between when the signal was generated and when the reflected signal was received. Triangulation may be performed. In other embodiments, distance sensor can be a contact sensor(s) such as, without limitation, a whisker(s). For example, a plurality of whiskers, each having a predetermined length may be utilized, with distance determined based on which whisker bends or is otherwise activated when making contact with the surface. A single whisker may be utilized with distance determined based, at least on part, on the bending angle of the whisker.
Referring to
In another embodiment, at least one distance sensor 22 may sense the distance between a fiducial point on the transporter platform 11 and a first component 23 that remains in a substantially fixed vertical position relative to the surface 19, as shown in the expanded view of a transporter in
A controller receives the signal characteristic of the attitude from the sensor module. Based at least on this signal, the controller implements a control algorithm to command a motorized drive arrangement so as to drive the at least one wheel. The controller may also respond to commands from other operator interfaces, such as a joystick or dial attached, for example, to handlebar.
The controller 30 includes a control algorithm to determine the amount of torque to be applied to the at least one wheel based on the sensed attitude of the support platform. The control algorithm may be configured either in design of the system or in real time, on the basis of current operating mode and operating conditions as well as preferences of the user. Controller may implement the control algorithm by using a control loop. The operation of control loops is well known in the art of electromechanical engineering and is outlined, for example, in Fraser & Milne, Electro-Mechanical Engineering, IEEE Press (1994), particularly in Chapter 11, “Principles of Continuous Control” which is incorporated herein by reference.
As an example, and not meant to be limiting, the control algorithm may take the form:
Torque Command to Wheel=K[θ+O]
where
The support platform attitude, θ, may be in the form of an error term defined as the desired support platform attitude minus the measured support platform attitude. The gain, K, may be a predetermined constant, or may be entered/adjusted by the operator through user interface 31. Responsiveness of the transporter to attitude changes can be governed by K. For example, if K is increased, a rider will perceive a stiffer response in that a small change in platform attitude will result in a large torque command. Offset, O, may be incorporated into the control algorithm to govern the torque applied to the motorized drive, either in addition to, or separate from, the direct effect of θ. Thus, for example, the user may provide an input by means of a user interface of any sort, the input being treated by the control system equivalently to a change, for example, in platform attitude.
Thus, referring back to
In various embodiments of the invention, the sensor module may sense changes in platform attitude in addition to, or instead of inclination of support platform in the fore-aft plane. For example, sensor module may provide an attitude signal indicative of inclination of the support platform in the lateral plane relative to the surface. This may be accomplished by the use of two laterally disposed distance sensors. Changes in the angle of inclination of the support platform in the lateral plane can then be used either separately or in combination with other attitude changes to control motion of the transporter. For example, changes in the angle of inclination in the fore-aft plane can be used to control fore-aft motion, while changes in the angle of inclination in the lateral plane can be used to control steering of the transporter.
Steering may be accomplished, in an embodiment having at least two laterally disposed wheels (i.e., a left and and right wheel), by providing separate motors for left and right wheels. Torque desired for the left motor and the torque desired from the right motor can be calculated separately. Additionally, tracking both the left wheel motion and the right wheel motion permits adjustments to be made, as known to persons of ordinary skill in the control arts, to prevent unwanted turning of the vehicle and to account for performance variations between the two motors.
The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/617,598, filed Jul. 11, 2003, which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/395,589, filed Jul. 12, 2002, both of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
584127 | Draullette et al. | Jun 1897 | A |
849270 | Schafer et al. | Apr 1907 | A |
1739716 | Fisher | Dec 1929 | A |
2742973 | Johannesen | Apr 1956 | A |
3145797 | Taylor | Aug 1964 | A |
3260324 | Suarez | Jul 1966 | A |
3283398 | Andren | Nov 1966 | A |
3374845 | Selwyn | Mar 1968 | A |
3399742 | Malick | Sep 1968 | A |
3446304 | Alimanestiano | May 1969 | A |
3450219 | Fleming | Jun 1969 | A |
3515401 | Gross | Jun 1970 | A |
3580344 | Floyd | May 1971 | A |
3596298 | Durst, Jr. | Aug 1971 | A |
3724874 | Simpson | Apr 1973 | A |
3860264 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3952822 | Udden et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3967862 | Hunter et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4018440 | Deutsch | Apr 1977 | A |
4062558 | Wasserman | Dec 1977 | A |
4076270 | Winchell | Feb 1978 | A |
4088199 | Trautwein | May 1978 | A |
4094372 | Notter | Jun 1978 | A |
4109741 | Gabriel | Aug 1978 | A |
4111445 | Haibeck | Sep 1978 | A |
4151892 | Francken | May 1979 | A |
4222449 | Feliz | Sep 1980 | A |
4264082 | Fouchey, Jr. | Apr 1981 | A |
4266627 | Lauber | May 1981 | A |
4293052 | Daswick et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4325565 | Winchell | Apr 1982 | A |
4354569 | Eichholz | Oct 1982 | A |
4363493 | Veneklasen | Dec 1982 | A |
4373600 | Buschbom et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375840 | Campbell | Mar 1983 | A |
4510956 | King | Apr 1985 | A |
4560022 | Kassai | Dec 1985 | A |
4566707 | Nitzberg | Jan 1986 | A |
4570078 | Yashima et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4571844 | Komasaku et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4624469 | Bourne, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4634142 | Woods et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4645230 | Hammons | Feb 1987 | A |
4657272 | Davenport | Apr 1987 | A |
4685693 | Vadjunec | Aug 1987 | A |
4709772 | Brunet | Dec 1987 | A |
4716980 | Butler | Jan 1988 | A |
4722547 | Kishi et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740001 | Torleumke | Apr 1988 | A |
4746132 | Eagan | May 1988 | A |
4749210 | Sugasawa | Jun 1988 | A |
4786069 | Tang | Nov 1988 | A |
4790400 | Sheeter | Dec 1988 | A |
4790548 | Decelles et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794999 | Hester | Jan 1989 | A |
4798255 | Wu | Jan 1989 | A |
4802542 | Houston et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809804 | Houston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834200 | Kajita | May 1989 | A |
4863182 | Chern | Sep 1989 | A |
4867188 | Reid | Sep 1989 | A |
4869279 | Hedges | Sep 1989 | A |
4874055 | Beer | Oct 1989 | A |
4890853 | Olson | Jan 1990 | A |
4919225 | Sturges | Apr 1990 | A |
4953851 | Sherlock et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4984754 | Yarrington | Jan 1991 | A |
4985947 | Ethridge | Jan 1991 | A |
4998596 | Miksitz | Mar 1991 | A |
5002295 | Lin | Mar 1991 | A |
5011170 | Forbes et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011171 | Cook | Apr 1991 | A |
5052237 | Reimann | Oct 1991 | A |
5064209 | Kurschat | Nov 1991 | A |
5111899 | Reimann | May 1992 | A |
5158493 | Morgrey | Oct 1992 | A |
5161820 | Vollmer | Nov 1992 | A |
5168947 | Rodenborn | Dec 1992 | A |
5171173 | Henderson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5186270 | West | Feb 1993 | A |
5221883 | Takenaka et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240266 | Kelley et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241875 | Kochanneck | Sep 1993 | A |
5248007 | Watkins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5314034 | Chittal | May 1994 | A |
5350033 | Kraft | Sep 1994 | A |
5366036 | Perry | Nov 1994 | A |
5376868 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5419624 | Adler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5497325 | Mine | Mar 1996 | A |
5641173 | Cobb | Jun 1997 | A |
5655615 | Mick | Aug 1997 | A |
5696515 | Zyren et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701965 | Kamen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701968 | Wright-Ott et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5718534 | Neuling | Feb 1998 | A |
5775452 | Patmont | Jul 1998 | A |
5791425 | Kamen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794730 | Kamen | Aug 1998 | A |
5873582 | Kauffman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899284 | Reimers et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921844 | Hollick | Jul 1999 | A |
5947505 | Martin | Sep 1999 | A |
5971091 | Kamen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973463 | Okuda et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975225 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986221 | Stanley | Nov 1999 | A |
6003624 | Jorgensen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039142 | Eckstein et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050357 | Staelin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059062 | Staelin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6125957 | Kauffmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6131057 | Tamaki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6223104 | Kamen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223114 | Boros et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225977 | Li | May 2001 | B1 |
6288505 | Heinzmann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302230 | Kamen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6556908 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20020063006 | Amesbury et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 048 593 | May 1971 | DE |
31 28 112 | Feb 1983 | DE |
32 42 880 | Jun 1983 | DE |
3411489 | Oct 1984 | DE |
44 04 594 | Aug 1995 | DE |
44 08 775 | Sep 1995 | DE |
196 25 498 | Nov 1997 | DE |
298 08 091 | Oct 1998 | DE |
298 08 096 | Oct 1998 | DE |
0 109 927 | Jul 1984 | EP |
0 193 473 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 537 698 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0663 313 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 958 978 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 551 986 | Oct 2001 | EP |
980 237 | May 1951 | FR |
2 502 090 | Sep 1982 | FR |
152664 | Feb 1922 | GB |
1213930 | Nov 1970 | GB |
2 139 576 | Nov 1984 | GB |
2 358 163 | Jan 2000 | GB |
52-44933 | Oct 1975 | JP |
57-87766 | Jun 1982 | JP |
57-110569 | Sep 1982 | JP |
59-73372 | Apr 1984 | JP |
62-12810 | Jul 1985 | JP |
0255580 | Dec 1985 | JP |
61-31685 | Feb 1986 | JP |
63-305082 | Dec 1988 | JP |
2-190277 | Jul 1990 | JP |
4-201793 | Jul 1992 | JP |
6-171562 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5-213240 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-105415 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7255780 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10023613 | Jul 1996 | JP |
WO 8605752 | Oct 1986 | WO |
WO 8906117 | Jul 1989 | WO |
WO 9623478 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9846474 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0073101 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 00 75001 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kawaji, S., Stabilization of Unicycle Using Spinning Motion, Denki Gakkai Ronbushi, D, vol. 107, Issue 1, Japan (1987), pp. 1-22. |
Schoonwinkel, A., Design and Test of a Computer-Stabilized Unicycle, Stanford University (1988), UMI Dissertation Services. |
Vos, D., Dynamics and Nonlinear Adaptive Control of an Autonomous Unicycle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989. |
Vos, D., Nonlinear Control of an Autonomous Unicycle Robot: Practical Isues, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992. |
Koyanagi et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot and its Posture Control and Vehicle Control, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Special issue of the 31st SICE Annual Conference, Japan 1992, pp. 13-16. |
Koyanagi, et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Special issue of the 31st SICE Annual Conference, Japan 1992, pp. 51-56. |
Koyanagi, et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot and its Two Dimensional Trajectory Control, Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics, Japan 1992, pp. 891-898. |
Watson Industries, Inc., Vertical Reference Manual ADS-C132-1A, 1992, pp. 3-4. |
News article Amazing Wheelchair Goes Up and Down Stairs. |
Osaka et al., Stabilization of unicycle, Systems and Control, vol. 25, No. 3, Japan 1981, pp. 159-166 (Abstract Only). |
Roy et al., Five-Wheel Unicycle System, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 23, No. 6, United Kingdom 1985, pp. 593-596. |
Kawaji, S., Stabilization of Unicycle Using Spinning Motion, Denki Gakkai Ronbushi, D, vol. 107, Issue 1, Japan 1987, pp. 21-28 (Abstract Only). |
Schoonwinkel, A., Design and Test of a Computer-Stabilized Unicycle, Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 49/03-B, Stanford University 1988, pp. 890-1294 (Abstract only). |
Vos et al., Dynamics and Nonlinear Adaptive Control of an Autonomous Unicycle—Theory and Experiment, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, A90-26772 10-39, Washington, D.C. 1990, pp. 487-494 (Abstract only). |
TECKNICO'S Home Page, Those Amazing Flying Machines, http://www.swiftsite.com/technico. |
Stew's Hovercraft Page, http://www.stewcam.com/hovercraft.html. |
Kanoh, Adaptive Control of Inverted Pendulum, Computrol, vol. 2, (1983), pp. 69-75. |
Yamafuji, A Proposal for Modular-Structured Mobile Robots for Work that Principally Involve a Vehicle with Two Parallel Wheels, Automation Technology, vol. 20, pp. 113-118 (1988). |
Yamafuji & Kawamura, Study of Postural and Driving Control of Coaxial Bicycle, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 54, No. 501, (May 1988), pp. 1114-1121. |
Yamafuji et al., Synchronous Steering Control of a Parallel Bicycle, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 55, No. 513, (May 1989), pp. 1229-1234. |
Momoi & Yamafuji, Motion Control of the Parallel Bicycle-Type Mobile Robot Composed of a Triple Inverted Pendulum, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 57, No. 541, (Sep. 1991), pp. 154-159. |
Popular Science, Nov. 2002, pp. 52-53 http://www.popsci/auto/article/0,12543,384518-2,00.html. |
Umea Institute of Design Degree Show 2002, Car Design News, http://www,cardesugbbews,cin/features/2002/020804umea-show/. |
International Search Report of Nov. 26, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070187166 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60395589 | Jul 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10617598 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11691903 | US |