Control of a transporter based on attitude

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8453768
  • Patent Number
    8,453,768
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 27, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 4, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A transporter for transporting a load over a surface. The transporter includes a support platform for supporting the load. The support platform is characterized by a fore-aft axis, a lateral axis, and an orientation with respect to the surface, the orientation referred to as an attitude. At least one ground-contacting element is flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation. One or more ground-contacting elements are driven by a motorized drive arrangement. A sensor module generates a signal characterizing the attitude of the support platform. Based on the attitude, a controller commands the motorized drive arrangement.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention pertains to transporters and methods for transporting a load, which may be a living subject, and more particularly to controlling motion of a transporter.


BACKGROUND ART

A wide range of vehicles having a motorized drive arrangement are known for conveying various subjects, either for purposive locomotion or for recreational purposes. The means used to command the motorized drive arrangement of these vehicles varies greatly. For example, an operator may manipulate an accelerator pedal to control forward motion of an automobile, while steering is typically performed using a steering wheel. Or the motion of a sporting vehicle may be controlled by rocking a foot board upon which a user is balanced towards the front or rear to mechanically move a throttle cable, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,790,548 (Francken). Based on the operator's physical attributes for example, or the transporter's intended functionality, alternative methods for controlling motion of a transporter may be desirable.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first embodiment of the invention there is provided a transporter for transporting a load over a surface. The transporter includes a support platform for supporting the load. The support platform is characterized by a fore-aft axis, a lateral axis, and an orientation with respect to the surface, the orientation referred to as an attitude. At least one ground-contacting element, which is driven by a motorized drive arrangement, is coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation. A sensor module generates a signal characterizing the attitude of the support platform. Based on the attitude, a controller commands the motorized drive arrangement.


In accordance with related embodiments of the invention, one or more ground-contacting elements may be flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a position of a center of mass of the load relative to the at least one ground-contacting element.


The sensor module may include at least one distance sensor for measuring a distance characteristic of the attitude of the platform. The distance sensor may be selected from the group of distance sensors consisting of an ultrasonic distance sensor, an acoustic distance sensor, a radar distance sensor, optical distance sensor, and a contact sensor, such as a whisker(s). The at least one distance sensor may sense the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and a position on the surface disposed at a specified angle with respect to the support platform. In other embodiments, the transporter may include a first component that remains in a substantially fixed vertical position relative to the surface, wherein the at least one distance sensor senses the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and the first component. One or more ground contacting elements may include a wheel having an axle, and the first component is fixed relative to the axle. Alternatively, and not meant to be limiting, one or more ground contacting elements may include a wheel supported by a frame, and the first component is fixed relative to the frame.


In accordance with other related embodiments of the invention, the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based at least on a signal generated by a remote control device. The transporter may include a powered strut coupled to the platform, the powered strut capable of varying the attitude of the support platform based at least on the signal generated by the remote control device. The transporter may further include a user interface, wherein the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a signal generated by the user interface. The controller may command motion of the transporter in the fore-aft plane and/or the lateral plane.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling a transporter having a support platform for supporting a load is presented. The support platform is characterized by an attitude with respect to the surface. The transporter includes at least one ground contacting elements flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the platform is capable of variation. The transporter also includes a motorized drive arrangement for driving the at least one ground contacting elements. The method includes generating a signal characterizing an attitude of the support platform. The motorized drive arrangement is commanded based at least on the attitude.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 depicts one embodiment of a human transporter, lacking a distinct user input device, to which the present invention may advantageously be applied;



FIG. 2 is a side view of a transporter, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3 is an expanded side view of a transporter, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a side view of a transporter, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a controller of a transporter, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, FIG. 1 shows a transporter, 1 lacking a distinct input device, to which the present invention may advantageously be applied. Transporter 1 is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Transporter 1 includes a support platform 11 for supporting a load, which may be a living subject 9, over the ground or other surface, such as a floor, which may be referred to herein generally as “ground”. A subject, for example, may stand or sit on support platform 11. Attached to support platform 11 may be a handlebar 12 that can be gripped when riding transporter 1.


One or more ground-contacting elements 2, 7 provide contact between support platform 11 and the ground. Ground-contacting elements 2, 7 may include, but are not limited to, arcuate members, tracks, treads, and wheels (hereinafter the term “wheel” will be used in the specification to refer to any such ground-contacting element without limitation). While the transporter 1 depicted in FIG. 1 lacks stability in its operating position unless subject to controlled balancing, the application of the present invention is specifically not limited to transporters of that sort and embodiments of the present invention may advantageously be applied to statically stable transporters as well.


Support platform 11 may be flexibly coupled to the wheels 2, 7 by various means known in the art, for example, a pivot mechanism, springs, or pneumatic pistons. In other embodiments, the wheels 2, 7 may have some compliance and serve the function of a spring. For purposes of the present description, platform 11 may be characterized by a fore-aft axis, a lateral axis, and an orientation with respect to the surface, which is referred to herein as an attitude. The fore-aft axis, X-X, is perpendicular to the wheel axis, while the lateral axis, Y-Y, is parallel to the axis of the wheels. Directions parallel to the axes X-X and Y-Y are called the fore-aft and lateral directions respectively.


Referring now to FIG. 2, which shows a transporter 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the attitude of support platform 11 may, for example, be capable of variation based on a position of a center of mass of the load relative to one or more wheels 13, 14. Alternatively, transporter 10 may include a power strut or other mechanism capable of altering the attitude of the support platform 11. The power strut may be controlled by a user interface located on transporter 10, such as a joystick or a rotatable potentiometer located on handlebar 12. In other embodiments, the power strut may also be controlled by a remote control device, such as, but not limited to, an infrared or radio controlled remote control device.


The motion of transporter 10 is based, at least in part, on the attitude of the support platform 11. To determine the attitude of the support platform 11, transporter 10 includes a sensor module. Sensor module may include at least one distance sensor 17, 18 for measuring a distance characteristic of the attitude of the support platform 11. The distance measured may be, for example, the distance between a fiducial point on the support platform 11 and a surface 19, or alternatively, another component on transporter 10. A plurality of distances measured by the sensor module may be combined to generate at least one signal characteristic of the platform attitude.


Attitude/distance sensor may be one of many sensor types, such as, for example, an ultrasonic, optical, acoustic or radar sensor wherein a signal generated by a source is reflected back by a surface to a sensor receiver. The distance from the sensor to the surface can then be calculated based on the time (or phase) difference between when the signal was generated and when the reflected signal was received. Triangulation may be performed. In other embodiments, distance sensor can be a contact sensor(s) such as, without limitation, a whisker(s). For example, a plurality of whiskers, each having a predetermined length may be utilized, with distance determined based on which whisker bends or is otherwise activated when making contact with the surface. A single whisker may be utilized with distance determined based, at least on part, on the bending angle of the whisker.


Referring to FIG. 2, distance sensors 17, 18 sense the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and a position on the surface that is disposed at a specified angle 3, 4, with respect to the support platform. First distance sensor 17 is located at the front (fore) of platform 11 and senses a first distance 5 between platform 11 and surface 19. Second distance sensor 17 is located at the back (aft) of platform 11 and senses a second distance 6 between platform 11 and surface 19. By comparing distances 5 and 6, a signal indicative of an attitude of the platform 11, and more specifically, the inclination of the platform 11 in the fore-aft plane with respect to the surface 19, can be determined.


In another embodiment, at least one distance sensor 22 may sense the distance between a fiducial point on the transporter platform 11 and a first component 23 that remains in a substantially fixed vertical position relative to the surface 19, as shown in the expanded view of a transporter in FIG. 3. First component 23 may be, for example, a wheel axle 23 or a frame used to support the at least one wheel 14. In various embodiments, first component 23 may include a reflector for reflecting the signal generated by distance sensor 22.



FIG. 4 shows a transporter 60 that includes a first support platform 69 and a second support platform 61, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. At least one wheel 63 and 64 provides contact between the first support platform 69 and the ground. Second support platform 61 is coupled to the first support platform 69 such that the second support platform 61 can tilt in the fore-aft plane based, for example, on a position of a center of mass of the loaded second support platform 61. Second support platform 61 may be tiltably attached to the first support platform 69 using, without limitation, springs 65 and 66 and/or a pivot mechanism 68. Similar to above-described embodiments, based on the tilting of the second support platform 61, at least one sensor 67 and 70 generates a signal indicative of the attitude of the second support platform 61. Attached to the first support platform 69 or second support platform 61 may be a handlebar 62 that can be gripped while operating the transporter 60.


A controller receives the signal characteristic of the attitude from the sensor module. Based at least on this signal, the controller implements a control algorithm to command a motorized drive arrangement so as to drive the at least one wheel. The controller may also respond to commands from other operator interfaces, such as a joystick or dial attached, for example, to handlebar.



FIG. 5 shows a controller 30 for controlling the motorized drive of the transporter, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Controller 30 receives an input characteristic of platform attitude from sensor module 34. Based at least on the input from the sensor module, controller 30 commands at least one motorized drive 35, 36. Controller 30 also interfaces with a user interface 31 and a wheel rotation sensor 33. User interface 31 may include, among other things, controls for turning the controller 30 on or off. When the controller 30 is turned off, the at least one wheel of the transporter may be free to move, such that the transporter acts as a typical push scooter. User interface 31 may also control a locking mechanism 32 for locking the at least one wheel.


The controller 30 includes a control algorithm to determine the amount of torque to be applied to the at least one wheel based on the sensed attitude of the support platform. The control algorithm may be configured either in design of the system or in real time, on the basis of current operating mode and operating conditions as well as preferences of the user. Controller may implement the control algorithm by using a control loop. The operation of control loops is well known in the art of electromechanical engineering and is outlined, for example, in Fraser & Milne, Electro-Mechanical Engineering, IEEE Press (1994), particularly in Chapter 11, “Principles of Continuous Control” which is incorporated herein by reference.


As an example, and not meant to be limiting, the control algorithm may take the form:

Torque Command to Wheel=K[θ+O]


where

    • K=gain,
    • θ=support platform attitude, and
    • O=offset.


The support platform attitude, θ, may be in the form of an error term defined as the desired support platform attitude minus the measured support platform attitude. The gain, K, may be a predetermined constant, or may be entered/adjusted by the operator through user interface 31. Responsiveness of the transporter to attitude changes can be governed by K. For example, if K is increased, a rider will perceive a stiffer response in that a small change in platform attitude will result in a large torque command. Offset, O, may be incorporated into the control algorithm to govern the torque applied to the motorized drive, either in addition to, or separate from, the direct effect of θ. Thus, for example, the user may provide an input by means of a user interface of any sort, the input being treated by the control system equivalently to a change, for example, in platform attitude.


Thus, referring back to FIG. 2, motion of the transporter 10 may be controlled by a subject changing the attitude of the platform 11. This change in attitude is reflected by distances 5, 6 sensed by the sensor module. Depending on the control algorithm, an initial change in attitude, such that first distance 5 is less than second distance 6, may result in positive torque being applied to one or more wheels 23, 24, causing the wheels 23, 24 to move forward. Likewise, an initial change in the attitude, such that first distance 5 is greater than second distance 6 may result in a negative torque applied to one or more wheels 23, 24, causing the wheels 23, 24 to move in the aft direction. If the subject then remains in his changed position on the platform such that the platform attitude remains the same, the motor will continue to torque at approximately the same rate.


In various embodiments of the invention, the sensor module may sense changes in platform attitude in addition to, or instead of inclination of support platform in the fore-aft plane. For example, sensor module may provide an attitude signal indicative of inclination of the support platform in the lateral plane relative to the surface. This may be accomplished by the use of two laterally disposed distance sensors. Changes in the angle of inclination of the support platform in the lateral plane can then be used either separately or in combination with other attitude changes to control motion of the transporter. For example, changes in the angle of inclination in the fore-aft plane can be used to control fore-aft motion, while changes in the angle of inclination in the lateral plane can be used to control steering of the transporter.


Steering may be accomplished, in an embodiment having at least two laterally disposed wheels (i.e., a left and and right wheel), by providing separate motors for left and right wheels. Torque desired for the left motor and the torque desired from the right motor can be calculated separately. Additionally, tracking both the left wheel motion and the right wheel motion permits adjustments to be made, as known to persons of ordinary skill in the control arts, to prevent unwanted turning of the vehicle and to account for performance variations between the two motors.


The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A transporter for transporting a load over a surface, the transporter comprising: a support platform for supporting the load, the support platform characterized by a fore-aft axis and a lateral axis;at least one ground-contacting element coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the orientation of the support platform with respect to the surface beneath and in contact with the at least one ground-contacting elements is capable of variation, the orientation referred to as an attitude;a motorized drive arrangement for driving the at least one ground-contacting elements;a sensor module for generating a signal characterizing the attitude of the support platform; anda controller for commanding the motorized drive arrangement to apply a torque to one or more of the ground-contacting elements as a function of the attitude of the support platform based upon the signal generated by the sensor module.
  • 2. The transporter according to claim 1, wherein one or more ground-contacting elements are flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a position of a center of mass of the load relative to the at least one ground-contacting element.
  • 3. The transporter according to claim 1, further including a first component that remains in a substantially fixed vertical position relative to the surface, wherein one or more ground contacting elements include a wheel having an axle, and the first component is fixed relative to the axle and wherein the sensor module senses the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and the first component.
  • 4. The transporter according to claim 3, wherein one or more ground contacting elements include a wheel supported by a frame, and the first component is fixed relative to the frame.
  • 5. The transporter according to claim 1, wherein the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based at least on a signal generated by a remote control device.
  • 6. The transporter according to claim 5, further including a powered strut coupled to the platform, the powered strut capable of varying the attitude of the support platform based at least on the signal generated by the remote control device.
  • 7. The transporter according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface, wherein the attitude of the support platform is capable of variation based on a signal generated by the user interface.
  • 8. The transporter according to claim 1, wherein the controller commands motion in the fore-aft plane.
  • 9. The transporter according to claim 1, wherein the controller commands motion in the lateral plane.
  • 10. A method for controlling a transporter having a support platform for supporting a load, the support platform characterized by an attitude with respect to a surface beneath the transporter, the transporter including at least one ground contacting elements flexibly coupled to the support platform in such a manner that the attitude of the platform is capable of variation, the transporter further including a motorized drive arrangement for driving the at least one ground contacting element, the method comprising: generating a signal characterizing an attitude of the support platform; andcommanding the motorized drive arrangement to apply a torque to one or more of the ground-contacting elements as a function of the attitude based upon the signal.
  • 11. A method according to claim 10, wherein generating the signal includes measuring a distance between a fiducial point on the platform and a position on the surface disposed at a specified angle.
  • 12. A method according to claim 10, wherein generating the signal includes measuring the distance between a fiducial point on the platform and a component on the transporter that remains in a substantially fixed position relative to the surface.
  • 13. A method according to claim 10, further comprising altering the attitude of the support platform by changing a position of a center-of-mass of the load relative to the at least one ground contacting element.
  • 14. A method according to claim 10, further comprising altering the attitude of the support platform based at least on a signal generated by a user interface of the transporter.
  • 15. A method according to claim 10, further comprising altering the attitude of the support platform based at least on a signal generated by a remote control device.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/617,598, filed Jul. 11, 2003, which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/395,589, filed Jul. 12, 2002, both of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (120)
Number Name Date Kind
584127 Draullette et al. Jun 1897 A
849270 Schafer et al. Apr 1907 A
1739716 Fisher Dec 1929 A
2742973 Johannesen Apr 1956 A
3145797 Taylor Aug 1964 A
3260324 Suarez Jul 1966 A
3283398 Andren Nov 1966 A
3374845 Selwyn Mar 1968 A
3399742 Malick Sep 1968 A
3446304 Alimanestiano May 1969 A
3450219 Fleming Jun 1969 A
3515401 Gross Jun 1970 A
3580344 Floyd May 1971 A
3596298 Durst, Jr. Aug 1971 A
3724874 Simpson Apr 1973 A
3860264 Douglas et al. Jan 1975 A
3952822 Udden et al. Apr 1976 A
3967862 Hunter et al. Jul 1976 A
4018440 Deutsch Apr 1977 A
4062558 Wasserman Dec 1977 A
4076270 Winchell Feb 1978 A
4088199 Trautwein May 1978 A
4094372 Notter Jun 1978 A
4109741 Gabriel Aug 1978 A
4111445 Haibeck Sep 1978 A
4151892 Francken May 1979 A
4222449 Feliz Sep 1980 A
4264082 Fouchey, Jr. Apr 1981 A
4266627 Lauber May 1981 A
4293052 Daswick et al. Oct 1981 A
4325565 Winchell Apr 1982 A
4354569 Eichholz Oct 1982 A
4363493 Veneklasen Dec 1982 A
4373600 Buschbom et al. Feb 1983 A
4375840 Campbell Mar 1983 A
4510956 King Apr 1985 A
4560022 Kassai Dec 1985 A
4566707 Nitzberg Jan 1986 A
4570078 Yashima et al. Feb 1986 A
4571844 Komasaku et al. Feb 1986 A
4624469 Bourne, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4634142 Woods et al. Jan 1987 A
4645230 Hammons Feb 1987 A
4657272 Davenport Apr 1987 A
4685693 Vadjunec Aug 1987 A
4709772 Brunet Dec 1987 A
4716980 Butler Jan 1988 A
4722547 Kishi et al. Feb 1988 A
4740001 Torleumke Apr 1988 A
4746132 Eagan May 1988 A
4749210 Sugasawa Jun 1988 A
4786069 Tang Nov 1988 A
4790400 Sheeter Dec 1988 A
4790548 Decelles et al. Dec 1988 A
4794999 Hester Jan 1989 A
4798255 Wu Jan 1989 A
4802542 Houston et al. Feb 1989 A
4809804 Houston et al. Mar 1989 A
4834200 Kajita May 1989 A
4863182 Chern Sep 1989 A
4867188 Reid Sep 1989 A
4869279 Hedges Sep 1989 A
4874055 Beer Oct 1989 A
4890853 Olson Jan 1990 A
4919225 Sturges Apr 1990 A
4953851 Sherlock et al. Sep 1990 A
4984754 Yarrington Jan 1991 A
4985947 Ethridge Jan 1991 A
4998596 Miksitz Mar 1991 A
5002295 Lin Mar 1991 A
5011170 Forbes et al. Apr 1991 A
5011171 Cook Apr 1991 A
5052237 Reimann Oct 1991 A
5064209 Kurschat Nov 1991 A
5111899 Reimann May 1992 A
5158493 Morgrey Oct 1992 A
5161820 Vollmer Nov 1992 A
5168947 Rodenborn Dec 1992 A
5171173 Henderson et al. Dec 1992 A
5186270 West Feb 1993 A
5221883 Takenaka et al. Jun 1993 A
5240266 Kelley et al. Aug 1993 A
5241875 Kochanneck Sep 1993 A
5248007 Watkins et al. Sep 1993 A
5314034 Chittal May 1994 A
5350033 Kraft Sep 1994 A
5366036 Perry Nov 1994 A
5376868 Toyoda et al. Dec 1994 A
5419624 Adler et al. May 1995 A
5497325 Mine Mar 1996 A
5641173 Cobb Jun 1997 A
5655615 Mick Aug 1997 A
5696515 Zyren et al. Dec 1997 A
5701965 Kamen et al. Dec 1997 A
5701968 Wright-Ott et al. Dec 1997 A
5718534 Neuling Feb 1998 A
5775452 Patmont Jul 1998 A
5791425 Kamen et al. Aug 1998 A
5794730 Kamen Aug 1998 A
5873582 Kauffman et al. Feb 1999 A
5899284 Reimers et al. May 1999 A
5921844 Hollick Jul 1999 A
5947505 Martin Sep 1999 A
5971091 Kamen et al. Oct 1999 A
5973463 Okuda et al. Oct 1999 A
5975225 Kamen et al. Nov 1999 A
5986221 Stanley Nov 1999 A
6003624 Jorgensen et al. Dec 1999 A
6039142 Eckstein et al. Mar 2000 A
6050357 Staelin et al. Apr 2000 A
6059062 Staelin et al. May 2000 A
6125957 Kauffmann Oct 2000 A
6131057 Tamaki et al. Oct 2000 A
6223104 Kamen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223114 Boros et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225977 Li May 2001 B1
6288505 Heinzmann et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302230 Kamen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6556908 Lu et al. Apr 2003 B1
20020063006 Amesbury et al. May 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (42)
Number Date Country
2 048 593 May 1971 DE
31 28 112 Feb 1983 DE
32 42 880 Jun 1983 DE
3411489 Oct 1984 DE
44 04 594 Aug 1995 DE
44 08 775 Sep 1995 DE
196 25 498 Nov 1997 DE
298 08 091 Oct 1998 DE
298 08 096 Oct 1998 DE
0 109 927 Jul 1984 EP
0 193 473 Sep 1986 EP
0 537 698 Apr 1993 EP
0663 313 Jul 1995 EP
0 958 978 Nov 1999 EP
0 551 986 Oct 2001 EP
980 237 May 1951 FR
2 502 090 Sep 1982 FR
152664 Feb 1922 GB
1213930 Nov 1970 GB
2 139 576 Nov 1984 GB
2 358 163 Jan 2000 GB
52-44933 Oct 1975 JP
57-87766 Jun 1982 JP
57-110569 Sep 1982 JP
59-73372 Apr 1984 JP
62-12810 Jul 1985 JP
0255580 Dec 1985 JP
61-31685 Feb 1986 JP
63-305082 Dec 1988 JP
2-190277 Jul 1990 JP
4-201793 Jul 1992 JP
6-171562 Dec 1992 JP
5-213240 Aug 1993 JP
6-105415 Dec 1994 JP
7255780 Mar 1995 JP
10023613 Jul 1996 JP
WO 8605752 Oct 1986 WO
WO 8906117 Jul 1989 WO
WO 9623478 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9846474 Oct 1998 WO
WO 0073101 Dec 2000 WO
WO 00 75001 Dec 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
Kawaji, S., Stabilization of Unicycle Using Spinning Motion, Denki Gakkai Ronbushi, D, vol. 107, Issue 1, Japan (1987), pp. 1-22.
Schoonwinkel, A., Design and Test of a Computer-Stabilized Unicycle, Stanford University (1988), UMI Dissertation Services.
Vos, D., Dynamics and Nonlinear Adaptive Control of an Autonomous Unicycle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
Vos, D., Nonlinear Control of an Autonomous Unicycle Robot: Practical Isues, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.
Koyanagi et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot and its Posture Control and Vehicle Control, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Special issue of the 31st SICE Annual Conference, Japan 1992, pp. 13-16.
Koyanagi, et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Special issue of the 31st SICE Annual Conference, Japan 1992, pp. 51-56.
Koyanagi, et al., A Wheeled Inverse Pendulum Type Self-Contained Mobile Robot and its Two Dimensional Trajectory Control, Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics, Japan 1992, pp. 891-898.
Watson Industries, Inc., Vertical Reference Manual ADS-C132-1A, 1992, pp. 3-4.
News article Amazing Wheelchair Goes Up and Down Stairs.
Osaka et al., Stabilization of unicycle, Systems and Control, vol. 25, No. 3, Japan 1981, pp. 159-166 (Abstract Only).
Roy et al., Five-Wheel Unicycle System, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 23, No. 6, United Kingdom 1985, pp. 593-596.
Kawaji, S., Stabilization of Unicycle Using Spinning Motion, Denki Gakkai Ronbushi, D, vol. 107, Issue 1, Japan 1987, pp. 21-28 (Abstract Only).
Schoonwinkel, A., Design and Test of a Computer-Stabilized Unicycle, Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 49/03-B, Stanford University 1988, pp. 890-1294 (Abstract only).
Vos et al., Dynamics and Nonlinear Adaptive Control of an Autonomous Unicycle—Theory and Experiment, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, A90-26772 10-39, Washington, D.C. 1990, pp. 487-494 (Abstract only).
TECKNICO'S Home Page, Those Amazing Flying Machines, http://www.swiftsite.com/technico.
Stew's Hovercraft Page, http://www.stewcam.com/hovercraft.html.
Kanoh, Adaptive Control of Inverted Pendulum, Computrol, vol. 2, (1983), pp. 69-75.
Yamafuji, A Proposal for Modular-Structured Mobile Robots for Work that Principally Involve a Vehicle with Two Parallel Wheels, Automation Technology, vol. 20, pp. 113-118 (1988).
Yamafuji & Kawamura, Study of Postural and Driving Control of Coaxial Bicycle, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 54, No. 501, (May 1988), pp. 1114-1121.
Yamafuji et al., Synchronous Steering Control of a Parallel Bicycle, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 55, No. 513, (May 1989), pp. 1229-1234.
Momoi & Yamafuji, Motion Control of the Parallel Bicycle-Type Mobile Robot Composed of a Triple Inverted Pendulum, Paper Read at Meeting of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (Series C), vol. 57, No. 541, (Sep. 1991), pp. 154-159.
Popular Science, Nov. 2002, pp. 52-53 http://www.popsci/auto/article/0,12543,384518-2,00.html.
Umea Institute of Design Degree Show 2002, Car Design News, http://www,cardesugbbews,cin/features/2002/020804umea-show/.
International Search Report of Nov. 26, 2003.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070187166 A1 Aug 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60395589 Jul 2002 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10617598 Jul 2003 US
Child 11691903 US