One or more embodiments relate generally to linearization of loudspeakers, and in particular, to linearization of loudspeakers based on nonlinear control of cone motion.
A loudspeaker is nonlinear by design and produces harmonics, intermodulation components and modulation noise. Nonlinear distortion impairs music quality and speech intelligibility. Industrial design constraints demand smaller speaker systems without sacrificing the sound output level and quality. This results in higher distortion.
One or more embodiments relate to linearization of loudspeakers based on nonlinear control of cone motion. In some embodiments, a speaker system includes a speaker driver configured to cause speaker cone displacement based on a driver voltage input. A controller is configured to generate the driver voltage input to the speaker driver. The controller includes: a feedforward control path configured to generate a nominal voltage input based on a nonlinear model of electroacoustic dynamics of the speaker driver and an input audio signal.
In some embodiments, a non-transitory processor-readable medium that includes a program that when executed by a processor performs a method comprising: generating a driver voltage input to a speaker driver. Generating the driver voltage input comprises generating a nominal voltage input based on a nonlinear model of electroacoustic dynamics of the speaker driver and an input audio signal. Speaker cone displacement is caused based on the driver voltage input.
In some embodiments, a method includes generating a driver voltage input to a speaker driver. Generating the driver voltage input comprises generating a nominal voltage input based on a nonlinear model of electroacoustic dynamics of the speaker driver and an input audio signal. Speaker cone displacement is caused by the driver voltage input.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the one or more embodiments will become understood with reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying figures.
The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of one or more embodiments and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular features described herein can be used in combination with other described features in each of the various possible combinations and permutations. Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be given their broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied from the specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in the art and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.
One or more embodiments provide for linearization of loudspeakers based on nonlinear control of cone motion. In some embodiments, a speaker system includes a speaker driver configured to cause speaker cone displacement based on a driver voltage input. A controller is configured to generate the driver voltage input to the speaker driver. The controller includes: a feedforward control path configured to generate a nominal voltage input based on a nonlinear model of electroacoustic dynamics of the speaker driver and an input audio signal.
In one or more embodiments, a linearization of a loudspeaker (or speaker driver) is achieved by nonlinear control of speaker cone motion. At each time instant, some embodiments calculate the input voltage value that produces a targeted displacement of the membrane of the cone and thus the intended sound wave. The operation for some embodiments may include:
a target cone displacement is derived from the desired sound pressure (e.g., determined from the sound stream, sound data file, etc.);
a model of an electroacoustic system (e.g., a driver plus enclosure) is used to calculate a nominal voltage (feedforward control) to obtain the target displacement;
monitoring the current drawn to estimate the actual cone displacement; and/or
the difference between the target and estimate of the actual (effective) cone displacement is used to determine a correction voltage, which is added to the feedforward control voltage. That correction voltage compensates for model inaccuracies (e.g., variations of samples of the speaker system, such as manufacturing dispersion) and drifting (e.g., driver's heating), sensing errors, exogenous disturbances on the speaker system (e.g., vibrations, actuator noise, etc.), non-zero initial states, etc.
In some embodiments, a speaker/sound driver with optimized characteristics is used to simplify real-time computations and digital control and includes a smooth force factor Bl(x), where x is the cone displacement, smooth mechanical stiffness K(x) and constant voice-coil inductance (over a useful range of cone displacement within the mechanical limits).
Some embodiments have the features over conventional loudspeaker systems of controlling voltage that eliminates the need of separate current and voltage sources, an overall simpler system design, better performances in term of nonlinear distortion and power consumption, compensates distortion effectively and cone displacement control protects loudspeakers against excessive displacement and overheating.
Creating smaller sized speaker systems can result in higher distortion. One or more embodiments described herein may serve as an anti-distortion system to achieve small-sized speaker systems. In some embodiments, a speaker system includes a control system that performs linearization of a loudspeaker (or driver) that includes a voice coil and has an inductance that is constant with respect to cone displacement. Some embodiments employ linearization processes, which may include flatness-based approaches, output and/or state feedback linearization, a Volterra-model based nonlinear compensator, a mirror filter, etc. In some embodiments, linearization is achieved, e.g., by nonlinear control of the driver's cone motion. At each time instant, the control system calculates the input voltage value that produces a targeted displacement of the cone and thus the intended sound wave.
Distortion is caused by the physical design of the speakers and produces harmonics, intermodulation components and modulation noise. Distortion can negatively affect the quality of the sound and, in particular, can limit the quality of the bass that can be achieved by the speaker. While all speakers have a level of distortion, certain design consideration, such as size, may tend to increase the amount of distortion. For example, industrial design constraints demand smaller speaker systems, which can increase the amount of distortion, without sacrificing the sound output level and quality.
Speaker distortion can be caused by a number of factors affecting the dynamics of the driver and transducer, which are described below in connection with
The approach of conventional nonlinear controlled speakers, such as the transducer 100, is to reduce the effects of distortion by generating an appropriate driver voltage that actuates the driver and transducer 100 in a way that counters the deleterious components of the distortion. In other words, nonlinearities in the transducer are treated by generated driver voltage at the input of the speaker to reduce the distortions at the output of the speaker. It can achieve this by including a model of the nonlinearities in the nonlinear controller and using the model (or the inverse of the model) to determine the input to the model that would generate the desired output. The transducer 100 may include a conventional nonlinear controller that includes a positional inductance compensator and a secondary distortions compensator, which include the models of the positional inductance nonlinearities and the secondary nonlinearities. This approach is an active approach, meaning that the system uses energy (in the form of the driver voltage) to reduce distortion.
In some embodiments, the nonlinear control system 305 may be embodied, in whole or in part, by a device that includes the loudspeaker system 340. In some embodiments, the whole nonlinear control system 305 may be embodied by a device that includes the loudspeaker system 340. In some embodiments, one or more of the components of the nonlinear control system 305 may be embodied by a separate device that is communicatively coupled with the device that includes the loudspeaker system 340.
In some embodiments, the nonlinear control system 305 deploys a process, algorithm, etc., that corresponds to a time-domain nonlinear feedback control based on differential flatness (by the flatness based feedforward control 320) and trajectory planning (by the trajectory planning block 310). In some embodiments, trajectory planning provided by the trajectory planning block includes setting the target sound pressure as proportional as the music or program material (e.g., the digital signal of the audio data representative of the acoustic waveform to be generated) and derives the target cone displacement (sometimes referred to as cone excursion) from the target sound pressure (e.g., by performing double integration). The displacement is used as the flat (linearizing) output of the loudspeaker system 340. In some embodiments, a nominal current (i.e., the target current provided by the trajectory planning block 310) is derived from it using the following equation:
i=(K(x)x+Rms{dot over (x)}+M{umlaut over (x)})/Bl(x).
In some embodiments, the flatness based feedforward control 320 provides calculating a nominal control voltage (e.g., feedforward control) from the displacement using the nonlinear model of the electroacoustic system (driver plus enclosure) and flatness approach. This voltage produces the target displacement under nominal conditions (exact model) using the following equation:
In some embodiments, the loudspeaker system 340 includes a driver with optimized characteristics and its enclosure. The driver receives a voltage as an input. Based on the input voltage, the driver actuates a voice coil actuator that causes a cone displacement x.
In some embodiments, the feedback control block 330 provides for monitoring the input current (i.e., the measured current drawn by the speaker driver system 340). The difference between the input current (i.e., the measured current drawn by the speaker driver system 340) and the nominal current (i.e., the target current generated by the trajectory planning block 310) is used to determine a correction voltage which is added to the feedforward control voltage. That correction voltage compensates for model inaccuracies (e.g., variations of samples of the loudspeaker system 340 (e.g., due to manufacturing dispersion, unmodeled dynamics and drifting (e.g., driver heating, driver aging, climate changes), sensing errors, exogenous disturbances on the loudspeaker system 340 (e.g., vibrations, room response, non-zero initial states, etc.) In some embodiments, the feedback control block 330 may be implemented using the following equation:
and includes several terms. In some embodiments, the terms may include proportional-integral-derivative terms with respect to the current error signal Δi, linear and/or nonlinear terms comprising the model dynamics of the loudspeaker system 340 (e.g., to cancel out the dynamics of the loudspeaker), a nonlinear damping term, and/or the like.
In some embodiments, the nonlinear control system 305 model parameters K(x), Rms, M, Bl(x), Re, and L0 may be stored in memory (not shown) coupled to the nonlinear control system 305. In some embodiments, K(x) and Bl(x) may be stored as either lookup tables or as closed form functions.
In some embodiments, the loudspeaker system 340 provides for a driver with optimized characteristics to simplify real-time computations and digital control: smooth force factor Bl(x), smooth mechanical stiffness K(x) and constant (or substantially constant) voice-coil inductance (e.g., constant inductance, or a predefined range of inductance, over a useful range of cone displacement within the mechanical limits). Constant inductance (or substantially constant inductance) may be achieved in the magnetic structure of the loudspeaker system 340 through several ways including:
In some embodiments, the nonlinear control system 305 may be applied to many different types of electrodynamic transducers and therefore has a broad range of applications (e.g., TV, sound bars, wireless speakers, mobile phones, etc.). The nonlinear control system 305 facilitates a higher level of reproduction, better sound quality and mechanical protection of transducers.
Some embodiments may implement the following:
In some embodiments, process 700 may further include adjusting the driver voltage input based on a feedback control path (e.g., feedback control 330). Process 700 may additionally include adjusting (e.g., by feedback control 330) the driver voltage input by generating a correction voltage based on a comparison of a target current and a measured current drawn by the speaker driver, where the driver voltage input is a sum of the nominal voltage input and the correction voltage. Process 700 may also include generating (e.g., by trajectory planning block 310) a target cone displacement based on the input audio signal, generating (e.g., by trajectory planning block 310) the target current based on the target cone displacement, and generating (e.g., by feedforward control 320) the nominal voltage input to the speaker driver based on the target cone displacement, the target current and the flatness process that includes determining the nominal voltage based on a function of the target displacement and its time derivatives, the target current and at least one derivative of the target current with respect to time.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
References in the claims to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described exemplary embodiments that are currently known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. section 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or “step for.”
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Though the embodiments have been described with reference to certain versions thereof; however, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/271,590, filed Dec. 28, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5600718 | Dent et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5870484 | Greenberger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6059926 | Hiroshima | May 2000 | A |
6275592 | Vartiainen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7024014 | Noll | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7348908 | Slavin | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359519 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372966 | Bright | May 2008 | B2 |
7467071 | Manrique et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477751 | Lyon et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7688964 | De Callafon | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8073149 | Kuze | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086956 | Su et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8130994 | Button et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146989 | Godiska et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8204210 | van de Laar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8300837 | Shmunk | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8391498 | Potard | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8538040 | Kirn | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8855322 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938084 | Arai | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9042561 | Gautama et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9130527 | Potard | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9154101 | Dhuyvetter | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9161126 | Su et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9374634 | Macours et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9432771 | Oyetunji et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9553554 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9578416 | Gautama et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9635454 | Larrien | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9661428 | Holladay et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9837971 | Luo et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9883305 | Risberg et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9900690 | Risberg et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9967652 | Baird et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980068 | Berthelsen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9992571 | Hu | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10219090 | Adams et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20020141098 | Schlager | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040028242 | Kitamura | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050122166 | Premakanthan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060274904 | Lashkari | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070098190 | Song et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090180636 | Su et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110182435 | Gautama | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120203526 | Bai et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120289809 | Kaib et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130094657 | Brammer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140051483 | Schoerkmaier | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140254827 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286500 | Iwamoto et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010171 | Pernici et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150281844 | Stabile | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319529 | Klippel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160134982 | Iyer | May 2016 | A1 |
20160360331 | Yeh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373858 | Lawrence et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170055067 | Moro et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170188150 | Brunet et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170272045 | Chadha | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280240 | Hu | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170318388 | Risberg et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170345438 | Thyssen | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180014120 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180034430 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180192192 | Brunet et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190222939 | Brunet et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190281385 | Brunet et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0548836 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1799013 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2642769 | Sep 2013 | EP |
3079375 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3433342 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004312141 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005129977 | May 2005 | JP |
2007060648 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007081815 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2015082754 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2015084499 | Apr 2015 | JP |
6182869 | Aug 2017 | JP |
10-20050023841 | Mar 2005 | KR |
10-20140097874 | Aug 2014 | KR |
101445186 | Oct 2014 | KR |
2013182901 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014045123 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015143127 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015191691 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2017088876 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 20, 2018 for International Application PCT/KR2018/000016 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-5, Republic of Korea. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jun. 14, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 31, 2017 for International Application PCT/KR2016/015435 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-12, Republic of Korea. |
Thomsen, S. et. al., “Design and Analysis of a Flatness-Based Control Approach for Speed Control of Drive Systems with Elastic Couplings and Uncertain Loads,” Proceedings of the 2011-14th European Conference (EPE 2011), Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 2011; pp. 1-10, IEEE Press, United States. |
Fliess, M. et al., “Flatness and Defect of Nonlinear Systems: Introductory Theory and Examples”, International Journal of Control, Jun. 1995, pp. 1327-1361, vol. 61, Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom. |
Papazoglou, N. et al., “Linearisation par Asservissement d'unhaut-parleur electrodynamique: approche par les Systemes Hamiltoniens a Ports”, Memoire De Fin D Etude M2R SAR Parcourt ATIAM, pp, 1-52, Aug. 11, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 23, 2018 for European Application No. 16882101.5 from European Patent Office, pp. 1-8, Munich, Germany. |
Hu, Y. et al., “Effects of the Cone and Edge on the Acoustic Characteristics of a Cone Loudspeaker”, Advances in Acoustics and Vibration, May 21, 2017, pp. 1-12, vol. 2017, Hindawi, Japan. |
Salvatti, A. et al., “Maximizing performance from loudspeaker ports,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Jan./Feb. 2002, pp. 19-45, v. 50, No. 1/2, United States. |
U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Apr. 11, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/000702 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-10, Republic of Korea. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated May 6, 2019. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 21, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/002741 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-3, Republic of Korea. |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Aug. 28, 2019. |
U.S. Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Aug. 28, 2019. |
U.S. Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Sep. 9, 2019. |
ProSoundWeb, “Harman Unveils JBL 3 Series Mk II Powered Studio Monitors,” Jan. 2018, pp. 1-4, EH Publishing, United States, downloaded at: https://www.prosoundweb.com/channels/recording/harman-unveils-jbl-3-series-mkii-powered-studio-monitors/. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/001090 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-13, Republic of Korea. |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jul. 15, 2019. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Jul. 18, 2019. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jan. 10, 2019. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/057,711 dated Apr. 2, 2019. |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Oct. 1, 2019. |
U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Oct. 18, 2019. |
U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Nov. 12, 2019. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/057,711 dated Sep. 17, 2019. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/224,604 dated Oct. 22, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170188150 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62271590 | Dec 2015 | US |