The following U.S. patents, patent applications and published patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties: U.S. Pat. No. 9,124,209 issued Sep. 1, 2015 to Liu et al., entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING POWER CONVERTER WITH INVERTER OUTPUT FILTER; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0123579 A1 to Liu et al., entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING POWER CONVERTER WITH INVERTER OUTPUT FILTER, and filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/555,769 on Nov. 28, 2014; U.S. Pat. No. 9,054,621 issued Jun. 9, 2015 to Liu et al., entitled POSITION SENSORLESS OPEN LOOP CONTROL FOR MOTOR DRIVES WITH OUTPUT FILTER AND TRANSFORMER; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0194901 A1 to Liu et al., entitled POSITION SENSORLESS OPEN LOOP CONTROL FOR MOTOR DRIVES WITH OUTPUT FILTER AND TRANSFORMER, and filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/666,894 on Mar. 24, 2015; U.S. Pat. No. 9,054,611 issued Jun. 9, 2015 to Liu et al., entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STABILITY CONTROL OF OPEN LOOP MOTOR DRIVE OPERATION; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0002067 A1 to Nondahl et al., entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STABILITY CONTROL OF OPEN LOOP MOTOR DRIVE OPERATION, and filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/193,329 on Feb. 28, 2014; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/565,781 filed Dec. 10, 2014 to Nondahl et al., entitled TRANSITION SCHEME FOR POSITION SENSORLESS CONTROL OF AC MOTOR DRIVES.
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to power conversion, and more specifically to controlling a power converter using current compensation based on an output filter transfer function.
Various aspects of the present disclosure are now summarized to facilitate a basic understanding of the disclosure, wherein this summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure, and is intended neither to identify certain elements of the disclosure, nor to delineate the scope thereof. Rather, the primary purpose of this summary is to present various concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form prior to the more detailed description that is presented hereinafter. The present disclosure provides power conversion systems and methods to drive a motor load through a filter. A drive controller or processor computes a speed error value according to a speed reference value and a speed feedback value, and computes a torque reference value according to the speed error value for use in computing a motor current reference value. The motor current reference value is compensated according to capacitor currents of the output filter using a transfer function representing an output current to input current amplitude vs. frequency behavior of the output filter and the motor load. The inverter is controlled according to the inverter output current reference value, and the speed feedback value is estimated according to the inverter output current reference value.
Referring now to the figures, several embodiments or implementations are hereinafter described in conjunction with the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout, and wherein the various features are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The presence of the output filter between the power conversion system and the load makes accurate control of the voltages and currents provided to the load more difficult, as the power delivered to the load is different from that delivered to the input of the filter. The output inverter stage may be controlled according to feedback signals measured at the inverter output terminals, but these feedback values generally do not represent the currents or voltages ultimately provided to the load. Feedback sensors can be provided at the load itself for direct measurement of the load parameters, but this increases system cost, and may not be possible in all applications.
Sensorless motor drives are used in a variety of applications, particularly where providing position and/or speed sensors directly at a motor load is difficult or impractical. In certain applications, a step-up transformer is used to boost the motor drive output voltage, allowing use of a low-voltage drive to power a medium voltage induction motor, and/or to reduce I2R losses and facilitate use of a smaller diameter cable wire for long cable runs between the motor drive and the driven motor. As previously discussed, certain applications also employ output filters between the motor drive inverter output and the transformer primary in order to suppress reflected wave voltage spikes associated with pulse width modulated (PWM) variable frequency drives. Use of sensorless voltage-frequency control techniques, however, may lead to problems, particularly where a transformer and/or sine wave filter is connected between the motor drive and the motor load. Conventional sensorless field-oriented-control (FOC) or other open loop speed control techniques have thus been found generally unsuitable for low-speed motor drive operation where output filters and transformers are used, such as in electric submersible pumps (ESPs), and these difficulties are particularly problematic in driving permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). Moreover, motors in sensorless speed control applications also suffer from oscillation in rotor velocity about the setpoint speed following load transitions or speed setpoint adjustments, particularly at low speeds. In certain situations, moreover, the driven motor may be unable to successfully start from a stopped condition due to unstable motor speed oscillations.
Presently disclosed embodiments provide power conversion systems 40 and inverter control methods and apparatus 100 to drive a motor load 20 through an intervening filter 30, which can also be used in combination with a transformer 50 and a potentially lengthy cables 60 coupled between the filter output and the driven motor load 20.
The motor drive 40 receives single or multiphase AC input power from a power source 10 and converts this to a DC bus voltage using a rectifier 42 which provides a DC output voltage to a DC link circuit 44 having a capacitor C1 The rectifier 42 can be a passive rectifier including one or more diode rectifier components, or may be an active front end (AFE) system with one or more rectifier switching devices (e.g., IGBTs, etc.) and an associated rectifier controller (not shown) for converting input AC electrical power to provide the DC bus voltage in the link circuit 44. Other configurations are possible in which the drive 40 receives input DC power from an external source (not shown) to provide an input to the inverter 46, in which case the rectifier 42 may be omitted. The DC link circuit 44 may include a single capacitor C or multiple capacitors connected in any suitable series, parallel and/or series/parallel configuration to provide a DC link capacitance across inverter input terminals 46A. In addition, while the illustrated motor drive 40 is a voltage source converter configuration including one or more capacitive storage elements in the DC link circuit 44, the various concepts of the present disclosure may be implemented in association with current source converter architectures in which a DC link circuit 44 includes one or more inductive storage elements, such as one or more series-connected inductors situated between the source of DC power (e.g., rectifier 42 or external DC source) and the input 46A of the inverter 46. In other possible implementations, the motor drive 40 includes a direct DC input to receive input power from an external source (not shown), and in certain embodiments the rectifier 42 and DC link circuit 44 may both be omitted.
The DC input 46A of the inverter 46 includes first and second (e.g., plus and minus) terminals connected to the DC link circuit 44, as well as a plurality of switching devices S1-S6 coupled between the DC input 46A and the motor drive AC output 46B. In operation, the inverter switching devices S1-S6 are actuated by inverter switching control signals 102 provided by the controller 100 to convert DC electrical power received at the DC input 46A to provide AC electrical output power as inverter output voltages, Vu, Vv, and Vw and inverter output currents iu, iv, and iw at the AC output 46B. The filter circuit 30 receives the AC output from the inverter 46 of the motor drive 40. Although illustrated as driving a permanent magnet synchronous motor 20, the motor drive 40 can be employed in connection with other types of AC motor loads 20 and/or other forms of power converters to drive non-motor loads 20 using an output inverter 46. One or more feedback signals or values may be provided from the motor 20 itself, including a motor (e.g., rotor) position or angle signal θr and a motor speed or velocity signal ωr, although not a strict requirement of all embodiments of the present disclosure. The concepts of the present disclosure advantageously facilitate the sensorless speed estimation by the inverter controller 100, and thus direct feedback from the driven motor load 20 is not required in all implementations. In this regard, the motor drive 40 in certain embodiments implements a motor speed and/or position and/or torque control scheme in which the inverter controller 100 selectively provides the switching control signals 102 in a closed and/or open-loop fashion according to one or more setpoint values such as a motor speed setpoint, which can be a signal or value generated by the controller 100, or a fixed setpoint value, or such setpoint value can be received from an external system (not shown). In practice, the motor drive 40 may also receive a torque setpoint and/or a position (e.g., angle) setpoint, and such desired signals or values (setpoint(s)) may be received from a user interface and/or from an external device such as a distributed control system, etc. (not shown). As used herein, a signal can be an analog signal, such as a current or a voltage signal, or a signal can include digital values generated or consumed by the processor 102.
The inverter 46 of the motor drive 40 is connected to the load 20 through the intervening filter circuit 30. In the illustrated example of
The output of the filter circuit 30 provides motor phase currents iout to control the motor load 20, whereas the filter capacitor currents iC flow in the filter capacitors C1 and non-zero voltages vL (i.e., filter voltages) may develop across one or more of the filter inductors Lr, whereby simple closed-loop control based on measured inverter output current signals or values iu, iv, iw may result in less than optimal operation of the driven load 20. At the same time, however, directly measuring the motor currents iout and/or motor voltages would require additional hardware and cabling, which may not be economically feasible or technically possible in certain applications. Nevertheless, for those cases where motor currents and/or motor voltages, such as Vu, Vv, Vw, Yf_out_u, Yf_out _v, and Vf_out_w in
The controller 100 and the components thereof may be any suitable hardware, processor-executed software, processor-executed firmware, logic, or combinations thereof that are adapted, programmed, or otherwise configured to implement the functions illustrated and described herein. The controller 100 in certain embodiments may be implemented, in whole or in part, as software components executed using one or more processing elements, such as one or more processors 102, and may be implemented as a set of sub-components or objects including computer executable instructions stored in the electronic memory 104 for operation using computer readable data executing on one or more hardware platforms such as one or more computers including one or more processors, data stores, memory, etc. The components of the controller 100 may be executed on the same computer processor or in distributed fashion in two or more processing components that are operatively coupled with one another to provide the functionality and operation described herein.
Referring also to
The controller 100 in certain embodiments is configured by execution in the processor 102 of instructions in the memory 104 to implement the control configuration illustrated in
At 308, the controller 100 compensates the motor current reference value or values Id,q.motor.ref according to capacitor currents iC of the output filter 30 by computing one or more inverter output current reference values (e.g., d and q axis values Id.inverter.ref and Iq.inverter.ref) according to the motor current reference value(s) Id,q.motor.ref and the operating frequency ω of the inverter 46 using the first transfer function 112 (1/Ai(ω)) via multiplier components 208 and 210, respectively. In one example, the first transfer function 112 represents the output current to input current amplitude vs. frequency behavior of the output filter 30 and the motor load 20. In certain embodiments, the first transfer function 112 includes parameter values representing impedance components (e.g., resistances, inductances, and/or capacitance) of the output filter 30 and the motor load 20. In other implementations, the transfer function 112 further includes parameters representing impedance components of any intervening transformer 50 and/or of the motor cable 60. In certain embodiments, moreover, the parameter values of the first transfer function 112 are configurable to adapt the power conversion system 40 for different output filters 30 and different motor loads 20. For example, the motor drive 40 and the inverter controller 100 are programmable in certain implementations to accept programming values for the parameters of a given filter 30 and/or motor load 20. This allows a user to adapt the motor drive 40 for use in combination with a variety of different filter and motor combinations.
At 310, the controller 100 provides the inverter switching control signals 102 to control the inverter 46 according to the inverter output current reference value(s) Id,q.inverter.ref, and the controller 100 computes or estimates the speed feedback value Speed.fbk according to any suitable measured or inferred value, such as inverter currents and voltages in one example. In another example, the controller uses sensor information for the speed feedback. In this manner, the current and voltage control of the driven motor 20 is compensated according to the transfer function 112 that characterizes the components of the intervening filter 30. Moreover, the controller 100 in certain embodiments implements sensorless speed control according to the estimated speed feedback value Speed.fbk without requiring speed feedback. In practice, without wishing to be tied to any particular theory, the steady state filter current compensation implemented by the controller 100 advantageously mitigates or avoids unwanted output oscillation in the motor speed and/or torque for sensorless ESP and other applications, thereby facilitating higher frequency operation of the driven motor load 20. This is particularly beneficial for deep well pumping applications where pumping speeds are important and the motor cable 60 may be quite lengthy.
In certain embodiments, the controller 100 implements voltage control. In the example of
In other possible implementations, the controller 100 operates to control the inverter 46 according to the inverter output current reference value Id,q.inverter.ref. In this case, the controller 100 computes the inverter output current value(s) Id,q.in according to the inverter output current reference value Id,q.inverter.ref and the inverter output current value Id,q.in, and provides the inverter switching control signals 102 to control the inverter 46 (e.g., at 310 in
The controller 100 thus implements capacitor current compensation for motor drives and other power conversion systems 40 to drive a motor 20 using an inverter 46 in systems employing and output sine wave filter 30 using filter and plant parameters without knowledge of voltages. The disclosed apparatus and method examples advantageously employ the transfer function 112 for filter capacitor current compensation in view of the impedance parameters of the output filter 30 and the load, including any associated transformer 50 and the driven motor 20 itself. Moreover, the drive 40 and the controller 100 are programmable to adapt to different filter and/or driven motor combinations.
Referring now to
Ai(ω)=Iout/Iin. (1)
Mu=K·√{square root over (Lr.u·Lrc.u)} (1)
0<K≦1 (2),
where “K” is a coupling coefficient. The single phase equivalent circuit shown in
M=K·L0 (3), and
L1=L2=(1−K)L0 (4).
The corresponding resonance frequencies (Hz) can be written as follows:
The damping factor “ξ” can be written as follows:
Reorganizing according to equations 3 and 4 yields the reorganized equivalent circuit shown in
The following equation (9) can be used to calculate the current Iz using equation (8):
After some manipulation, the current through the impedance Z is given according to the following equation (10):
The output voltage (e.g.,
The filter capacitor current Ic1 can be expressed by the following equation (12):
The input current provided to the filter 30 is given by the following equation (13):
Iin=Iz+Ic1 (13)
Substituting equations (10) and (12) into equation (13), gives the following representations of the input current in the voltage V2:
Substituting equation (16) into equation (11), yields the following equation (17):
From equation (15), the input current can be expressed according to the following equation (18):
The voltage V2 can then be expressed according to the following equation (19):
V2=Vin−Iin*(Rr+KL0P) (19)
From equations (15) and (19), the following relationships can be determined:
Or:
After some manipulation the input current to input voltage transfer function can be expressed according to the following equation (24):
Where:
From equation (17), the following input current formula can be obtained:
Further manipulation according to equations 25-28 yields the following expression of the filter input current:
Where:
g2=C1L1 (36)
g1=RdampC1 (37)
From equations (24) and (35), the following output-to-input voltage transfer functions can be derived:
Or:
Where:
As seen in
The following output current-to-input voltage equation (44) can be obtained from equations (38) and (43):
From equations (24) and (44), the first transfer function 112 can be expressed according to the following equation (45) to relate amplitude as a function of frequency for the filter 30 and the plant (load):
A phase-frequency response can also be obtained for equations (24), (39), (44-45). Substituting “jω” for the operator “p” in equation (45), gives the following equation (46):
After some manipulation, the following transfer function equations (47) and (48) can be derived:
Or:
Where:
The amplitude-frequency response Ai(ω) can be represented according to the following equation (51):
The phase-frequency response φi(ω) can be represented as follows:
φi(ω)=A TAN 2(ai,bi) (52)
Again substituting “jω” for the operator “p” in equation (24) gives the following equation (53):
After some manipulation the following equation (54) can be derived:
Where:
The amplitude-frequency response Aiv(ω) can be represented as follows:
Aiv(ω)=√{square root over (aiv2+biv2)} (57)
The phase-frequency response φiv(ω) can be represented as follows:
φiv(ω)=A TAN 2(aiv,biv) (58)
Again substituting “jω” for the operator “p” in equation (39), gives the following equation (59):
After some manipulation, the following output-input voltage relationship (60) can be derived:
Where:
Amplitude-frequency response Av(ω) can be represented as follows:
Av(ω)=√{square root over (av2+bv2)} (63)
Phase-frequency response φiv(ω) can be represented as follows:
φv(ω)=A TAN 2(av,bv) (64)
Let's substitute “jω” instead of operator “p” into equation (44), then:
After some manipulation we can derived:
Where:
Amplitude-frequency response Av(ω) can be represented as follows:
Ai-out,v=√{square root over (ai-out,v2+bi-out,v2)} (69)
Phase-frequency response φiv(ω) can be represented as follows:
φi-out,v(ω)=A TAN 2(ai-out,v,bi-out,v) (70)
Based on equations (24) and (51), the general dynamic control approach of
Referring now to
The damping factor “ξ” for no load condition can be written as follows:
In
Using equation (76), the input current Iin can be expressed according to the following equation (77):
The input current can be expressed, following some manipulation, according to the following equations (78) and (79):
Or:
The output voltage Vout can be expressed according to the following equation (80):
Following some manipulation, the output voltage can be expressed according to the following equations (81) and (82):
Or:
The filter output current Iout (
Or:
From equation (79) the following input voltage equation (85) can be obtained:
From equations (84) and (85) the following output-input current relationship (86) can be obtained:
If damping resistor is omitted from the filter 30, the following relationships (87)-(90) are found:
Amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency transfer functions can be obtained for equations (79), (82), (84), and (86). Initially, equation (79) can be rewritten according to the following equation (91):
Where:
Substituting “jω” for the operator “p” in equation (91) and rearranging the terms yields the following input current-input voltage relationship (92):
For the manipulation yields the following equation (93):
Where:
The amplitude-frequency response Ai(ω) can be represented according to the following equation (96):
The phase-frequency response φi(ω) can be represented as follows:
φi(ω)−A TAN 2(ai,bi) (97)
Referring now to
The second transfer function 114 relating the filter input current to the filter input voltage is given by the following equation (99):
Where,
m1=(R2+R3)C1+R1C1+R3C2 (100)
m2=[2(1−K)L0+L3]C1+L3C2+R3C2*(R1+R2)C1 (101)
m3=2(1−K)L0C1*R3C2 (102)
Rearranging yields the following equation (107) for the first transfer function 112:
The following equation (108) expresses the second transfer function 114.
As discussed above, the first and second transfer functions 112 (equation (107) and 114 (equation (108) can be implemented by the processor 102 in the drive controller 100 in order to provide steady state filter current compensation to drive a motor load 20 through an intervening filter 30. As seen above, the transfer functions 112 and 114 may be expressed in terms of the impedance components of the output filter 30 and the load (e.g., motor load 20 and any intervening transformer 50, cable 60, etc.), and the parameters of equations (107) and (108) can be configured in the memory 104 of the controller 100 in order to adapt a particular motor drive power conversion system 40 for operation in association with a variety of different filter/load combinations.
In the preceding specification, various embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3723840 | Opal et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
4823251 | Kawabata et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5032771 | Kerkman | Jul 1991 | A |
5526252 | Erdman | Jun 1996 | A |
5703449 | Nagate | Dec 1997 | A |
5717305 | Seibel | Feb 1998 | A |
5744921 | Makaran | Apr 1998 | A |
5909098 | Konecny et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5959431 | Xiang | Sep 1999 | A |
5990654 | Skibinski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994869 | Bacerra | Nov 1999 | A |
6121736 | Narazaki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124697 | Wilkerson | Sep 2000 | A |
6208537 | Skibinski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222335 | Hiti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6329781 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6600980 | Kraska et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6940249 | Toyoda | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965212 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7045988 | Ha et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049778 | Katanaya | May 2006 | B2 |
7084604 | Salomaki | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102323 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7468595 | Lee | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7679308 | Tomigashi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683568 | Pande et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724549 | Skibinski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729146 | Hayami et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7932693 | Lee | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7979223 | Monti et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990097 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009450 | Royak et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8143838 | Akiyama | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8217602 | Ikei | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232760 | Lu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8288886 | Anwar et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299646 | Rockenfeller et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8350507 | Ito | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8541971 | Sakai | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8736220 | Ogawa et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8890450 | Maekawa | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8970154 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8981702 | Katariya et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9054611 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9054621 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9124209 | Liu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20040052097 | Morimoto | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060113952 | Zhou | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070001635 | Ho | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070007929 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080001571 | Tomigashi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074074 | Skibinski et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080312855 | Monti et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090146592 | Tobari et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153083 | Rozman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200980 | Ramu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110062908 | Kitanaka | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084638 | Patel et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106470 | Yin | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109155 | Anwar et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110181232 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120038300 | Kato et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120268056 | Liu | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130153180 | Montocchio et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140197774 | Liu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228980 | Ohta et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140312811 | Liu | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150002059 | Liu | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150002067 | Rowan et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150123579 | Liu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2513286 | Sep 2002 | CN |
101383585 | Mar 2009 | CN |
201504207 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101950983 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102045021 | May 2011 | CN |
102349230 | Feb 2012 | CN |
202872721 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103190068 | Jul 2013 | CN |
1635448 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1868288 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2390766 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2001-025282 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002034289 | Jan 2002 | JP |
WO2009093214 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Guidelines for the Use of 400-600 Volt AC Drives in Medium Voltage Applications,” Yaskawa Application Note, Jun. 7, 2005. |
Agarlita, Sorin-Cristian et al., “I-f Starting and Active Flux Based Sensorless Vector Control of Reluctance Synchronous Motors, with Experiments”, 12th Int'l Conf. on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, OPTIM 2010, pp. 337-342. |
Andreescu, G., et al. “Stable V/f Control System with Unity Power Factor for PMSM Drives”, IEEE 13th Int'l Conf. on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), May 2012, pp. 432-438. |
Batzel, Todd D. et al., “Electric Propulsion With Sensorless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor: Implementation and Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 20, No.3, pp. 575-583, Sep. 2005. |
Carpaneto, et al., “A New Sensorless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Algorithm Based on Algebraic Method”; 13th European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications, 2009; EPE 2009; Sep. 8-10, 2009, Barcelona, Spain; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Sep. 8, 2009, pp. 1-10. |
Colby, Roy S., “An Efficiency-Optimizing Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 24, No. 3, May/Jun. 1998, pp. 462-469. |
Fatu et al., I-F Starting Method With Smooth Transition to EMF Based Motion-Sensorless Vector Control of PM Synchronous Motor/Generator, 2008, IEEE, pp. 1481-1487. |
Halkassari, Optimal U/F-Control of High Speed Permanent Magnet Motors, 2006, IEEE, pp. 2302-2308. |
Iepure, Liviu Ioan et al., “Hybrid I-f Starting and Observer-Based Sensorless Control of Single-Phase BLDC-PM Motor Drives”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, No. 9, Sep. 2012, pp. 3436-3444. |
J. Liu et al., “Rotor Position Estimation for Synchronous Machines Based on Equivalent EMF”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 47, pp. 1310-1318, May-Jun. 2011. |
Jaitrong et al., “A Modify Technique to Actively Damp Oscillation in the Input LC Filter of Three-Phase PWM Rectifier”, Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2008; Proceedings of ECTI-CON 2008; pp. 1017-1020. |
Kim et al., “PWM Switching Frequency Signal Injection Sensorless Methods in IPMSM”, IEEE, 2011, pp. 3021-3028. |
Muchi, M., et al., “V/f Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Suitable for Home Appliances by DC-link Peak Current Control Method”, The Jun. 2010 Int'l Power Electronics Conference, IEEE 2010, pp. 567-573. |
Kobayashi et al., “Investigation of IPMSM's Position Estimation in Low Speed Region with DC Link Current Detection”, IEEE Jan. 2007, pp. 1411-1416. |
Kojima, Mari et al., “Novel Vector Control System Using Deadbeat-Controlled PWM Inverter With Output LC Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 162-169, Jan./Feb. 2004. |
Kubota et al., “Sensorless Vector Control of Closed-Slot Induction Machines at Low Frequency”, IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications, vol. 2, No. 1, The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 2013, pp. 74-78. |
Kukrer, “Deadbeat Control of a Three-Phase Inverter with an Output LC Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1996, 8 pgs. |
Laczynski et al., “Active Damping of LC-Filters for High Power Drives Using Synchronous Optimal Pulsewidth Modulation”, Power Electronics Specialists Conf., IEEE, Jun. 15, 2008, pp. 1033-1040. |
Loh, Poh Chiang et al., “Analysis of Multiloop Control Strategies for LC/CL/LCL-Filtered Voltage-Source and Current-Source Inverters”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 644-654, Mar./Apr. 2005. |
Makridenko, L.A. et al., “Sensorless Drive With Synchronous Machine and Submersible Inverter for Oil-Drowned Pump”, IEEE European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE), pp. 1-10, Sep. 2009. |
Matsushita, M., et al., “Stabilization Control of Sensorless Sinusoidal Wave Drive for Control of Power Factor of PM Motor”, IEEE Int'l Conf. Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 2009, 5 pgs. |
Miranda et al., “Parameter and Speed Estimation for Implementing Low Speed Sensorless PMSM Drive System Based on an Algebraic Method”; Applied Power Electronics Conf.; APEC 2007, 22nd Annual IEEE; Feb. 1, 2007,;pp. 1406-1410. |
Miranda et al., “Sensorless Control of a PMSM Synchronous Motor at Low Speed”; IEEE Industrial Electronics; IECON 2006; 32nd Annual Conf., IEEE; Piscataway, NJ; Nov. 1, 2006; pp. 5069-5074. |
Moldovan et al., “Active-Flux Based, V/f-With-Stabilizing-Loops Versus Sensorless Vector Control of IPMSM Drives”; Industrial Electronics (ISLE); 2011 IEEE Int'l Symposium; Jun. 27, 2011; pp. 514-519. |
Mukherjee et al., “Fast Control of Filter for Sensorless Vector Control SQIM Drive With Sinusoidal Motor Voltage”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, No. 5, Oct. 2007, pp. 2435-2442. |
Nakamura, Yoshinobu et al., “High-Efficiency Drive Due to Power Factor Control of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 10, No. 2, Mar. 1995, Manuscript rec'd Aug. 22, 1992, revised Sep. 13, 1994, pp. 247-253. |
Park et al., “Analysis and Reduction of Time Harmonic Rotor Loss in Solid-Rotor Synchronous Reluctance Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, No. 2, Mar. 1, 2008, pp. 985-992. |
Park et al., “Design and Control of High-Speed Solid-Rotor Synchronous Reluctance Drive With Three-Phase LC Filter”, Conference Record of the 2005 IEEE Industry Applications Conf. 40th IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 1, Oct. 2, 2005, pp. 715-722. |
Perera, P.D. Chandana, “A Sensorless, Stable V/f Control Method for Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 39, No. 3, May/Jun. 2003, IEEE 2003, pp. 783-791. |
Ryvkin, S. et al., “Sensorless Oil Drowned Pump Drive”, IEEE ISIE 2005, Jun. 20-23, 2005, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 963-968. |
Salomäki, J. et al., “Sensorless Control of Induction Motor Drives Equipped With Inverter Output Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 1188-1197, Aug. 2006. |
Salomäki, J. et al., “Sensorless Vector Control of PMSM Drives Equipped With Inverter Output Filter”, in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2006), Paris, France, pp. 1059-1064. |
Steinke et al., “Use of a LC Filter to Achieve a Motorfriendly Performance of the PWM Voltage Source Inverter”, Electric Machines and Drives Conference Record, 1997; IEEE, Milwaukee, WI, May 18, 1997, 3 pgs. |
Stirban et al., “Motion-Sensorless Control of BLDC-PM Motor With Offline Fem-Information-Assisted Position and Speed Observer”; IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications; IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ; vol. 48, No. 6; Nov. 1, 2012; pp. 1950-1958. |
Yaskawa Technical Review, vol. 69, No. 2, AC Drive Drive, Sensorless Drive Technology for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor; http://www.yaskawa.co.jp/en/technology/tech—news/69-2/t10.htm, retrieved from the Internet 11-26-2-14, 1 pg. |
Yim et al., “A Predictive Current Control Associated to EKF for High Performance IPMSM Drives”; Applied Power Electronics Conf. and Exposition (APEC), 2011; 26th Annual IEEE, Mar. 6, 2011; pp. 1010-1016. |
Stirban et al., “Motion-Sensorless Control of BLDC-PM Motor With Offline FEM Information Assisted State Observer”; Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), 2010 12th International Conference, May 22, 2010, pp. 321-328. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/555,769, filed Nov. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,329, filed Feb. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/565,781, filed Dec. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/625,860, filed Feb. 19, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/607,505, filed Jan. 28, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,894, filed Mar. 24, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/971,221, filed Dec. 16, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170222588 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |