1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to electronic circuits and, more specifically, to microprocessors exploiting an external memory. “External memory” means a memory connected to the processor by communication buses accessible for a measurement of the electric signals, for example, by a possible person attempting to fraud.
The present invention more specifically applies to the checking of the integrity (the absence of modification between the writing and the reading thereof) of information contained in an external volatile memory for processing by a microprocessor.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
A solution to check the integrity of the content of a memory read by a microprocessor is known as the CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) and comprises storing, with the content of a block in the memory, a value representative of this content. This value is then checked on reading to detect possible errors in the content of the memory block. Such a solution may be efficient to detect incidental errors but is not efficient against a possible hacking. Indeed, it is enough for the hacker to know the CRC value calculation mode to be able to force the system with erroneous data, accompanied with a CRC value which will have been calculated by the hacker himself and which will be admitted by the system.
Another solution comprises ciphering the entire memory content by means of a ciphering algorithm executed by the microprocessor. On reading, the data extracted from the memory are then deciphered by the microprocessor. Such a solution does not prevent the introduction of erroneous data, for example, in a fraud attempt by fault injection into the program execution, since the data or instructions will anyway be deciphered by the processor.
A third solution is based on the calculation of a signature with a key (MAC—Message Authentication Code) or with no key (hash function), and comprises calculating the result of a cryptographic algorithm. US patent application no 2006/0253708 describes an example of a solution with a key. This solution provides good results but requires storing a large number of data (one per memory line) on the microprocessor side. Such storage spaces are not always available.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,247,151 discloses a method for verifying the integrity of data stored in a memory, two signatures respectively taking into account a data and a copy of it in another memory area are generated.
The present invention aims at overcoming all or part of the disadvantages of known methods and devices for controlling the integrity of a memory external to a microprocessor.
An object more specifically is a storage-space-saving solution on the microprocessor side.
Another object is a solution compatible with usual algorithms of message authentication code (MAC) calculation or the like.
Another object is a solution adapted to an external memory of RAM type.
To achieve all or part of these objects as well as others, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for recording at least one information block in a first volatile memory external to a circuit, in which:
a first digital signature is calculated based on information and data internal to the circuit; and
a second digital signature is calculated based on first signatures of a group of information blocks and on a digital quantity internal to the circuit and assigned to said group.
According to an embodiment, the second signature is stored internally to the microprocessor.
According to an embodiment, the first signature is stored in the external memory.
According to an embodiment, the digital quantity changes for each group.
According to an embodiment, the second signature uses no key.
The present invention also provides a method for checking the content of at least one block of information read from a volatile memory external a circuit, in which:
a first signature stored in the external memory on recording of said block is compared with a first current signature; and
a second signature stored internally to the circuit is compared with a second current signature, said signatures being calculated in accordance with the recording method.
According to an embodiment, an integrity of the data block is validated only in case of an identity of the first current and stored signatures, and of the second current and stored signals.
The present invention also provides a controller of the intensity of information stored in a non-volatile memory external to a circuit containing the controller.
The present invention also provides a microprocessor comprising signature calculation means for the storage of an information bloc in a volatile memory external to this microprocessor.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description of specific embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The same elements have been designated with the same reference numerals in the different drawings.
For clarity, only those steps and elements useful to the understanding of the present invention have been shown in the drawings and will be described. In particular, the details constitutive of the microprocessor have not been discussed, the present invention being compatible with any conventional microprocessor. Similarly, the mechanisms for addressing and exploiting information read from or written into an external memory by a microprocessor have not been detailed, the present invention being here again compatible with usual mechanisms.
A difference between the written and read data may result from a fraud attempt by a possible hacker or an incidental malfunction. In both cases, it is useful for the microprocessor to be able to detect that the data that it is about to process do not correspond to those which have been previously stored.
According to an embodiment, the data contained in work memory 13 are, by block, associated with a first integrity control authentication code or signature (MAC) stored outside of microprocessor 1 (for example, in external memory 13). A second authentication or integrity control code (MAC′), stored internally to the microprocessor, is a function, not of the data, but of the external authentication codes MAC of a group of memory blocks. The need for storage inside of the microprocessor is thus decreased without adversely affecting the security. After, a memory line will be taken as an example as a granularity, that is, the size of a block on which the externally-stored signature is calculated corresponds to the size of a line. In the drawings, the internal portions (secure, of the system) and the external portions (non secure) have been separated by dotted lines to better illustrate the elements and steps needed on both sides.
Integrity controller 12 comprises a function 121 for calculating a message authentication code (MAC) or more generally any integrity code of signature type. This block receives, for example, a key K specific to the integrated circuit. As a variation, it may be a session key of a program or more generally any known code of circuit 1. When a data line Li is provided by unit 11 (block 30,
First signature MACi associated with data line Li and provided by function 121 is stored (block 33, STORE MACi) in an area of memory plane 131 with all the signatures associated with a group Gj of memory lines. The size of the group is conditioned by the size of a block (a line j) of signatures. The signatures calculated for the successive lines Li of group Gj are temporarily stored in a register 122 (MAC REG) of circuit 12. If the granularity of the writing into the memory is finer than that of a signature group, it is however possible to perform the writings successively without waiting for the calculation of all the signatures in the group.
Internally to system 1, a reference word REFj associated with group Gj of lines is used by a generator 123 of a signature (MAC′) associated with the group. Generator 123 calculates (block 34, MAC′j=MAC′({MACi}, REFj)) a signature of a group of message authentication codes MACi by associating reference REF therewith. This calculation needs not take into account any secret key since code MAC′ remains internal to system 1. Code MAC′ is, for example, stored (block 35, STORE REFj, MAC′j) with reference REFj used for its calculation, in volatile storage elements 124 (INTMEM), internal to the microprocessor (for example, a RAM, registers, etc.). Reference word REFj is, for example, a random number drawn on each writing of a line into the memory. As a variation, word REF is the value of a counter incremented for each new information to be stored.
When an address i of a data line Li in memory 13 is provided by central unit 11 on address bus 141 (
An advantage is that the function of calculation of second signature MAC′ may be simple since all its elements remain internal to the secure system.
This especially enables fast read checking in the memory. Such a mechanism is in particular faster than mechanisms known as the “Merkel tree” which comprise performing successive signature calculations based on the previous signatures. Such mechanisms require a very large number of calculations.
Another advantage of the provided mechanism is that a single number (for example, random) is required per signature group.
As a specific example of embodiment, signature MAC′ is calculated from a diffusion or hash function (HASH), for example, an XOR-type combination of signatures MACi of group j and reference REFj. Specific embodiments of the present invention have been described. Various alterations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. In particular, the adaptation and the selection of the sizes of codes MAC or MAC′ depends on the size of the manipulated data and on the size of the data storable in the memory. Further, the selection of the calculation function to be used and of the signature size depends on the desired security and, preferably, on the functions available on the processor side. Further, the provided solution may be combined with other integrity control solutions.
Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting. The present invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 54591 | Apr 2007 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6038317 | Magliveras et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6212635 | Reardon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247151 | Poisner | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6826690 | Hind et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6983364 | Gougeon | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7363495 | Felt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7516327 | Kawell et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526654 | Charbonneau | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7886153 | Miyazawa | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7921295 | Kwak et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7996680 | Kalibjian et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8225182 | Kagan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8302167 | Mennes et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312023 | Shields et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316183 | Lowery | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8438174 | Shields et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8504528 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20020035695 | Riches et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030065923 | Parry | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040080998 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040186998 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050071633 | Rothstein | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076215 | Dryer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125659 | Sarfati et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060047967 | Akhan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070033467 | Bancel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079139 | Kim | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070277246 | Kawell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294738 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080126429 | Kalibjian et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080260287 | Berryman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263422 | Bardouillet | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090164517 | Shields et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090235339 | Mennes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100094817 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100185827 | Lowery | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217948 | Mason et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100251385 | Fellers et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287196 | Shields et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317420 | Hoffberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110072278 | Izu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083064 | Kagan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113013 | Reddy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110208969 | Kuhlman | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238430 | Sikorski | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120221859 | Marien | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246535 | Kagan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120331553 | Aziz et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130061110 | Zvibel | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073949 | Barrell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
French Search Report from French Patent Application 07/54591 dated Sep. 21, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080263422 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |