The invention pertains to process control and has application to remote process control.
Process control refers to the control of the operational parameters of a system by monitoring one or more of its characteristics over time. It is used to insure that the quality and efficiency of the system remain within desired parameters over the course of time. While process control is typically employed in the manufacturing sector for process, repetitive and discrete manufactures, it also has wide application in service industries, such as environmental control.
Process control equipment typically utilizes control/sensing devices that are physically integrated into the systems being controlled. For example, a thermostat is typically used in environmental control to insure that building temperatures remain within specified parameters. Likewise, flow control sensors and automated valves are typically used in process manufacturing to insure proper fluid flow volumes.
Though in early process control systems, control/sensing devices were typically stand-alone units, modern process control systems provide central workstations for monitoring and controlling the control sensing devices. Particularly robust systems are the I/A Series industrial automation systems designed, manufactured and marketed by the assignee hereof, The Foxboro Company, of Foxboro, Mass., USA. In these systems, multiple control/sensing devices are coupled by way of buses to control stations which, in turn, are coupled by way of a local area network (LAN) to one or more operator workstations.
The I/A Series systems are built around the client/server model. Client applications software executing on the workstations exchange information with the control/sensing devices via a server, referred to as the “object manager,” executing in distributed fashion in the control stations. Upon request by a client application, the server creates, locates, accesses and updates data structures (“objects”) storing information on the status of at least selected control/sensing devices. For example, a client application that displays temperatures sensed by a thermocouple requests that the server create an object storing a temperature reading from the thermocouple and that the server notify the client each time the temperature changes.
Although modern process control systems, such as the I/A Series systems, have proven quite successful, to date they have provided only limited remote access capabilities. Thus, while numerous operator workstations may reside within the factory or facility in which the control/sensing devices are disposed, it has traditionally proven difficult to access and control those devices outside those areas.
Remote access and control of processes is desirable for a number of purposes. A plant manager who is “on the road,” for example, may wish to monitor the plant processes while travelling. By way of further example, the manufacturer of process control equipment may require remote access to a plant's control/sensing devices in order to provide technical support.
An object of this invention is to provide improved methods and apparatus for process control.
Another object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as permit monitoring and control of remote processes.
Still another object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be readily adapted to existing automated process control systems.
Yet still another object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be implemented without undue expense and without undue consumption of resources.
The aforementioned objects are among those attained by the invention, which provides, in one aspect, a system for process control comprising a server digital data processor and a client digital data processor that are coupled by a network, such as the Internet or an Intranet. The server digital data processor, which is additionally coupled to a control/sensing device and associated interface equipment (collectively, referred to as “process control apparatus”), includes a command processor that transfers information between the network and the process control apparatus.
The client digital data processor includes an information client (e.g., an Internet web browser) capable of requesting and receiving an applet from the server digital data processor. That information client, further, defines a hardware-independent and operating system-independent virtual machine environment within the client digital data processor.
The client digital data processor executes, within that virtual machine environment, an applet that configures the client digital data processor as a “process controller” that establishes communications over the network with the command processor and that monitors and/or controls the process control apparatus via those communications. The applet is intermediate or executable code that is suitable for interpretation or execution within the virtual machine environment and that is hardware-independent, operating system-independent and windows system-independent
In further related aspects, the aforementioned applet can be, for example, JAVA programming language bytecode, and the virtual machine environment can be that created by a JAVA-enabled web browser.
According to other aspects of the invention, the command processor in a system for process control as defined above provides services (i.e., “software services”) for access and modification of information regarding the process control apparatus. These services can permit, for example, the creation of a data structure object that stores information about the process control apparatus and that associates a name with that object; the destruction of such an object; the accessing of information in such an object; the updating of information in such an object; the determination, from an object name, of the physical address of the object; and the notification of changes in information stored by the object. The process controller generates and transmits over the network to the command processor requests for such services in order to monitor and/or control the process control apparatus.
A further aspect of the invention provides a system as described above in which the process controller generates and transfers commands (e.g., requests for service) over the network to the command processor in order to effect a transfer from the command processor of information regarding a status of the process control apparatus. The command processor responds to those requests by generating information on the status of the process control apparatus and transferring it back to the process controller over the network. The process controller can, for example, generate a user display based on that information.
In a related aspect, the command processor responds to selected commands (i.e., requests for event-driving access) by notifying the process controller of changes in the status of at least selected aspects of the process control apparatus. By way of example, where the process control apparatus includes a thermocouple, this aspect of the invention permits notification of the command processor whenever the thermocouple senses a change in temperature that exceeds a predetermined delta value.
Still further aspects of the invention provide process control systems as described above in which the server digital data processor includes an information server (e.g., a hypertext transfer protocol server). An information client (e.g., web browser) in the client digital data processor establishes communications with the information server over the network and receives therefrom a hypertext markup language (HTML) document referencing the applet. The web browser generates a user display of that document and, in response to a user command, transfers to the information server a request for the applet.
Yet still further aspects of the invention provide systems for process control in which a first digital data processor executes a JAVA applet within a virtual machine environment defined on the digital data processor. The applet configures the digital data processor to generate a message to invoke a method in connection with monitoring and/or controlling a process control apparatus. An object manager, which is in communication with the JAVA applet, responds to the message for invoking the method.
Other aspects of the invention provide methods for process control paralleling the operations of the systems described above.
These and other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the detailed description that follows.
A further understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which
Server digital data processor 16 is, additionally, coupled to process control apparatus 19a-19e via bus/network structure 30 and control stations 23a-23e, as shown. The process control apparatus include conventional control/sensing devices, which are shown in the illustration as flow control valves, and associated interface equipment, which are marked “FBM” in the illustration. The process control apparatus 19a-19e are intended to represent any conventional control/sensing devices and interface equipment of the type conventionally used to monitor and control processes—including, by way of non-limiting example, continuous, repetitive and discrete processes, and environmental control processes, among others.
As discussed below, control stations 23a-23e include objects storing information that control, and reflect the status of, their associated process control apparatus 19a-19e. The control stations 23a-23e also execute object management software (marked “OM”) that manage and oversee access to those objects. The control stations 23a-23e are of the type conventionally used in a distributed process control architecture. Preferred such control stations are commercially available from the assignee hereof, The Foxboro Company, as part of its I/A Series industrial automation systems.
The digital data processors 12, 14, 16 comprise conventional digital data processing systems of the type commercially available in the marketplace. Though client digital data processors 12, 14 are illustrated as a portable computer and a personal digital assistant, respectively, those skilled in the art will appreciate that these may comprise other computing systems, such as desktop computers and workstations, as well. The digital data processors 12, 14, 16 may be coupled to the network 18 directly, as shown, or other networks (e.g., LANs and WANs), routers, or interface servers (not shown).
The network 18 comprises any conventional digital data processing network (e.g., LAN or WAN), cable television-based network, wireless network and/or any telecommunications-based network capable of supporting communications between server digital data processor 16 and client digital data processors 12, 14. The network 18 preferably comprises the global Internet and/or an enterprise-based Intranet supporting communications via the TCP/IP protocol (i.e., the current standard protocol of the Internet). Utilization of networks supporting this protocol is advantageous insofar as it permits the use of commercially available products (such as web browsers, discussed below) in components of the illustrated embodiment. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention is applicable to networks supporting other protocols, as well.
The digital data processors 12, 14, 16 execute software that respectively configure them for communication over the network 18. For example, they execute protocol stacks and other software that permit them to establish and carry out communications utilizing the TCP/IP network protocol. In addition, they execute information client/server software that configures them to carry on high-level communications, particularly, over the Internet.
More particularly, in the illustrated embodiment, server digital data processor 16 includes information server 20 responsible for establishing communications over network 18 with information clients executing on the client digital data processors 12, 14.
The information server 20 is preferably a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) server capable of transferring markup language information and, particularly, hypertext markup language (HTML) documents, to the client digital data processors 12, 14. In alternative embodiments of the invention, information server 20 can comprise any other such server capable of supplying an applet to the client digital data processors 12, 14 in response to requests by them.
The information server 20 establishes communications with the client digital data processors 12, 14 and, particularly, their respective information clients in the conventional manner known in the art. Once communications are established, the information server transfers to the information client an applet that executes within the virtual machine environment and that monitors and/or controls the process control apparatus via communications with a command processor in the server digital data processor 16, as discussed below.
The client digital data processors 12, 14 include information clients 22, 24, respectively, that are responsible for initiating and conducting at least preliminary communications with the server digital data processor 16 over the network 18. The information clients 22, 24, particularly, (1) initiate communications with the information server 20 over the network, (2) request and receive from the information server 20 an applet, and (3) define a platform-independent (i.e., a hardware-independent, operating system-independent and window system-independent) virtual machine environment within the respective client digital data processor 12, 14. Such information clients are, in one embodiment, JAVA-compliant web browsers including the HotJava browser from Sun MicroSystems, Inc., NetScape Navigator from Netscape Communications Corporation, and the Internet Explorer from Microsoft Corporation.
As used herein, an applet is intermediate or executable code suitable for interpretation or execution within the virtual machine environment and that is hardware-independent, operating system-independent and windows system-independent. Preferred applets are in the form of Java bytecode of the type generated by the Java language compiler available from Sun Microsystems, Inc.
The aforementioned preferred web browsers define a preferred virtual machine environment comprising the Java programming language run-time platform and Java interpreter.
Although a preferred information client is a web browser, the invention can be practiced with other information clients capable of (1) initiating communications with the information server 20, (2) requesting and receiving from the information server 20 an applet, and (3) defining a platform-independent (i.e., a hardware-independent, operating system-independent and windows system independent) virtual machine environment within the respective client digital data processor 12, 14 for execution of such an applet.
In addition to information server 20, server digital data processor 16 includes command processor 25, comprising front end 25a, interface section 25b, and an object manager 25c. Together, these transfer information between the network 18 and process control apparatus 19a-19e. As shown in the illustration, the object manager functionality is distributed among the control stations 23a-23e. Each object manager maintains the data structures—to with, objects—that control and reflect the status of its associated process control apparatus 19a-19e.
The object manager 25c provides software services for access that permit the creation of named objects; destruction of such objects; accessing and updating of information in the objects; the locating of objects within the distributed process control architecture; and notification of changes in the information stored in objects (i.e., event-driven notification).
As noted, the object manager 25c allows uniquely named objects to be distributed over the control stations 23a-23e in a location-independent way. Using the object manager 25c (via front end 25a), applets 26, 28 may create, read, write, and destroy instances of objects, which are subtyped into four categories: variaible—used to contain an instance of any scalar data type (e.g., int, float, etc.) or a string; alias—used to contain a string which refers to the name of another object; device—used to identify a station or device in the system. An instance of a device type object contains no explicit state—the name of the object is itself the state; and process—used to identify an executing process in the system. A process object is identical to a device object in that there is no explicit state.
As indicated above, in order to manipulate instances of objects, the object manager 25c provides life cycle services, access services and connection services. Life cycle services are used to create, name, and destroy shared objects; to register the name of process-control objects; and to find the location of any object. Access Services are used to get and set the value of one or more process-control and/or shared objects. Typically, access services are suitable for situations where a single transfer of data is sufficient.
Connection services are also used to get and set the value of one or more process-control and/or shared objects. However, these services are more suited for situations where multiple transfers of data are expected. In addition, connection services provide the ability for a client to be continuously updated with the value of an object when it exceeds a specified delta.
The object manager 25c relies upon the use of broadcasts over bus stricture 30 in order to perform the above services. For example, when an applet 26, 28 makes an access request on an object by name, the object manager 25c will broadcast the access request to all stations 23a-23e, if the object manager 25c does not know the location of object. Each station 23a-23e then determines if it is the one that hosts the requested object. Only the station that hosts the named object responds to the request.
A preferred object manager 25c is that commercially available from the assignee hereof, The Foxboro Company, as part of its I/A Series of industrial automation systems. A software interface, or “API,” of that preferred object manager is described in publicly available documentation, including the document entitled “Object Manager Calls,” a copy of which is filed as an appendix herewith.
The command processor front end 25a executes on server digital data processor 16, configuring it to respond to requests from applets 26, 28 to establish communications with them over the network 18. Once communications are established, the front end 25a responds to requests received from applets 26, 28 over network 18 to transfer information to and from process control apparatus 19a-19e via the object manager 25c.
Particularly, the front end 25a responds to requests received over the network in TCP/IP protocol to generate calls to object manager 25c in accord with its aforementioned API. Moreover, the front end 25a responds to information generated by the object manager 25c in response to those calls by transmitting that information back over the network 18, in accord with the TCP/IP protocol, to the applets 26, 28. In a preferred embodiment, the front end 25a presents a simplified interface to the object manager 25c, e.g., permitting applets 26, 28 to make requests and receive responses in the form of text strings, as discussed below.
Software implementing a preferred front end 25a as a Java programming language application is filed as appendix hereto. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that alternate embodiments may implement the front end in other programming languages suitable for, or that can be adapted to, provide an interface between the network 18 protocol and the object manager 25c.
Interface section 25b provides a software interface between the front end 25a and the object manager 25c. As noted above, in a preferred embodiment, the front end 25a is implemented as a Java programming language application. The object manager 25c, on the other hand, is implemented as a C programming language application and, accordingly, its API includes pointer-based parameters. The interface section 25b compensates for the inability of the Java front end 25a to utilize pointer-based parameters, e.g., by converting them to arrays as discussed further below.
Software implementing a preferred interface section 25b in the C programming language is filed as appendix hereto. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that interface section 25b is optional and may be excluded in embodiments where the front end 25a can make calls directly to the object manager 25c.
The client digital data processors 12, 14 execute applets 26, 28 within the virtual machine environments defined by the information clients 22, 24. Each applet 26, 28 configures its respective client digital data processors as a process controller that establishes communications over the network 18 with the command processor front end 25a and that monitors and/or controls the process control apparatus 19a-19e via those communications. More particularly, the process controllers generate and transfer requests for service over the network 18 to the command processor 25 so as to effect the transfer of information controlling, and reflecting the status of, the process control apparatus 19a-19e. The process controllers also receive information from the command processor 25, e.g., for display to an operator.
As noted above, the applets 26, 28 comprise intermediate or executable code that is interpreted or executed with in the virtual machine environment defined by the information clients and that is hardware-independent, operating system-independent and windows system-independent. Source code for preferred applets, in the Sun MicroSystems Java programming language, is provided in the appendix filed herewith.
A process control system constructed and operated in accord with system 10 of
Referring to
In response the operator's request, the information client 22 generates and transmits over network 18 a request for connection with information server 20, e.g., an HTTP server, executing on server digital data processor 16. Once the connection is established, the HTTP server 20 sends to the web browser 22 an HTML page that references (i.e., provides an address for) a trend-graphing applet. The HTML page also optionally includes text and graphics describing the applet.
The web browser 22 displays the HTML on the operator console. If the operator signals the web browser 22 that he or she wishes to access the applet, the web browser 22 transmits to the HTTP server 20 over the network 18 a request for the applet. It will be appreciated that the applet may be transmitted to the web browser 22, along with an initial HTML document.
The HTTP server 20 responds to such a request for forwarding Java bytecode for the applet over the network 18 to the web browser 22. On receipt of the applet, the JAVA-compatible web browser 22 executes the applet 26 in the virtual machine environment defined in the web browser 22.
Once executing, the applet 26 sends a request to establish a separate communications link over the network 18 with the command processor front end 25a, e.g., a Java application executing on the server digital data processor 16. This separate connection is used by the applet 26 and the front end 25a to permit the exchange messages over the network and, particularly, to permit the applet 26 to make requests of the command processor 25 for process control apparatus data to be graphed.
Once communications are established, the applet 26, 28 generates a display on the operator console of the client digital data processor 12 and permits the operator to enter the names of process control apparatus data values (i.e., “points”) that are to be graphed. On the operator's command, the applet 26 sends a request over the network 18 to the front end 25a specifying the OMOPEN service and listing the names of operator-specified points. The request is in text or ASCII format, e.g., “OMOPEN name1; name2; name3; etc.”
On receipt of the OMOPEN request, the front end 25a creates a data structure required by object manager 25c, to with an OM list, and includes in that data structure the names of the specified points. The front end 25a then makes an “omopen list” call to the object manager 25c utilizing the aforementioned API. A further understanding of the OM list data structure and of the “omopen list” call, as well as the other data strictures and calls to the object manager 25c, may be attained by reference to the appendix filed herewith.
The object manager 25c responds to the omopen list call by querying the respective process control apparatus 19a-19e for current data values for the points. The object manager 25c returns those data values to the front end 25a which, in turn, generates and transmits to the applet 26, 28 a text message listing the initial data points. That message includes the keyword OMUPDATE, followed by the names and values of each of the points, e.g., “OMUPDATE point1=value; point2=value; etc.” The applet 26, 28 graphs those initial data points on the operator console.
The object manager 25c then begins looping, while awaiting further requests from the client applet 26 and while awaiting updates on the data values from the object manager 25c. When such an update is received, the front end 25a generates and transmits to the applet 26 a further text message in the form “OMUPDATE point1=value; point2=value; etc.” listing the updated data values points. The applet 26 graphs those initial data points on the operator console at the end of the graph time interval.
The front end 25a continues looping and forwarding updates until the operator signals the applet 26 to stop trend graphing. In that event, the applet 26 sends a close request over the network to the front end 25a in the form of a text message “OMCLOSE.” On receipt of that request, the front end 25a, in turn, makes an omclose list call to the object manager 25c in accord with the aforementioned API. When that call returns, front end 25a sends an “OMCLOSEOK” text message to the applet, 26 causing it to clear the trend graph.
At this point, the operator can either specify new points to the applet 26 or can tell the web browser 22, 24 to connect to a different information server. If the operator signals that he or she wishes to connect to another server, the client applet 26 breaks the connection with the server by sending an “OMBREAK” message to the front end 25a over the network. The front end 25a than resets, and waits for the next connection.
In a preferred embodiment, the method illustrated in
The above-described trend-graphing client Java applet preferably runs in the Java Virtual Machine that is implemented by Netscape Navigator version 2.02. The trend client applet 26 is intended to be portable. So it only uses those classes that are present in all implementations of the Java systems. The trend-graphing applet 26 uses Java system classes to manage the screen, and connect to the trend server, and provide timing intervals.
The trend-graphing applet 26 implements classes that conduct all operator interaction. For example, it accept the names of the points to be graphed. It also defines the GUI buttons used by the operator to signal when graphing is to start or stop. Further, the trend-graphing applet 26 plots X-Y axes, graph the points, and parses messages from the front end 25a.
The applet 26 also processes the following messages from the server:
“OMUPDATE name2=value; name3=value; . . . ”; OMCLOSEOK.
The illustrated front end 25 (or “trend-graphing server”) is not portable to just any Java Virtual Machine because it must call outside of the Java environment to the object manager 25c. To do this, the trend server class is defined to have “native methods”. A “native method” is any member function of a class that is implemented in a language other than Java. A native method can enable access to functions and data that are “native” to a particular hardware platform operating system or a running application (like the object manager 25c).
Native member functions are declared in the class as native. They are implemented in a library that is loaded by the Java environment at runtime. On Solaris this is a libfile.so file. On Windows NT this would be a library.dbl file. The native methods, which constitute the interface 25b, are defined to create a new OM list, add a named point to the list, open the list, check the list for updates (using dqchange), and close the list. Source code for a preferred implementation of native methods is supplied in the appendix filed herewith.
The command processor front end 25a runs in a Solaris implementation of the Java Virtual Machine. The front end 25a processes the following messages from the applet 26: “OMOPEN name1; name2; name3; . . . ” (in response to which it creates a list with the specified points and opens the list): “OMCLOSE” (in response to which it closes the list); and “OMBREAK” (in response to which reset and wait to accept a new connection).
Described above and illustrated in the drawings are improved methods and apparatus for process control. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments discussed above and shown in the claims are merely illustrative and that other embodiments incorporating modifications within the reach of one of ordinary skill in the art fall within the scope of the invention.
This is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/765,006, filed Jan. 26, 2004, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE PROCESS CONTROL, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/379,074, filed Aug. 23, 1999, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE PROCESS CONTROL, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/700,199, filed Aug. 29, 1996, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE PROCESS CONTROL, the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
3810119 | Zieve et al. | May 1974 | A |
3825905 | Allen, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4096566 | Borie et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4302820 | Struger et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4312068 | Goss et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4323966 | Whiteside et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4347563 | Paredes et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4351023 | Richer | Sep 1982 | A |
4377000 | Staab | Mar 1983 | A |
4410942 | Milligan et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4423486 | Berner | Dec 1983 | A |
4428044 | Liron | Jan 1984 | A |
4435762 | Milligan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4456997 | Spitza et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4466098 | Southard | Aug 1984 | A |
4471457 | Videki, II | Sep 1984 | A |
4488226 | Wagner, Jr. et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4493027 | Katz et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4609995 | Hasebe et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612620 | Davis et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4615001 | Hudgins, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4628437 | Poschmann et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641276 | Dunki-Jacobs | Feb 1987 | A |
4648064 | Morley | Mar 1987 | A |
4649479 | Advani et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4663704 | Jones et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672530 | Schuss | Jun 1987 | A |
4675812 | Capowski et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682304 | Tierney | Jul 1987 | A |
4683530 | Quatse | Jul 1987 | A |
4692859 | Ott | Sep 1987 | A |
4692918 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4703421 | Abrant et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4709325 | Yajima | Nov 1987 | A |
4719593 | Threewitt et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727477 | Gavril | Feb 1988 | A |
4733366 | Deyesso et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740955 | Litterer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742349 | Miesterfeld et al. | May 1988 | A |
4750109 | Kita et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4790762 | Harms et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800512 | Busch | Jan 1989 | A |
4805107 | Kieckhafer et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816996 | Hill et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817094 | Lebizay et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4839854 | Sakami et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4872106 | Slater | Oct 1989 | A |
4885707 | Nichol et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4896290 | Rhodes et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897777 | Janke et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4910658 | Dudash et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910691 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
4918690 | Markkula, Jr. et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4924462 | Sojka | May 1990 | A |
4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
4940974 | Sojka | Jul 1990 | A |
4958277 | Hill et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959774 | Davis | Sep 1990 | A |
4965717 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4965742 | Skeirik | Oct 1990 | A |
4965880 | Petitjean et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4991076 | Zifferer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4991170 | Kem | Feb 1991 | A |
5008805 | Fiebig et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5050165 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5068778 | Kosem et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5122948 | Zapolin | Jun 1992 | A |
5129087 | Will | Jul 1992 | A |
5131092 | Sackmann et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136704 | Danielsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5138708 | Vosbury | Aug 1992 | A |
5146589 | Peet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
5151930 | Hagl | Sep 1992 | A |
5151978 | Bronikowski et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151981 | Westcott et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159673 | Sackmann et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162986 | Graber et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163055 | Lee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166685 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168276 | Huston et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175698 | Barbanell | Dec 1992 | A |
5175829 | Stumpf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5193175 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5212784 | Sparks | May 1993 | A |
5218187 | Koenck et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5233615 | Goetz | Aug 1993 | A |
5245704 | Weber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251125 | Karnowski et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255367 | Bruckert et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257208 | Brown et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258999 | Wernimont et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271013 | Gleeson | Dec 1993 | A |
5283729 | Lloyd | Feb 1994 | A |
5289365 | Caldwell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291390 | Satou et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295258 | Jewett et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295263 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297143 | Fridrich et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301346 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5302952 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303227 | Herold et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303375 | Collins et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303392 | Carney et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307372 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307463 | Hyatt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5310998 | Okuno | May 1994 | A |
5317726 | Horst | May 1994 | A |
5325339 | Yost et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327144 | Stilp et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335186 | Tarrant | Aug 1994 | A |
5335221 | Snowbarger et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339362 | Harris | Aug 1994 | A |
5339680 | Bronkal et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347181 | Ashby et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349343 | Oliver | Sep 1994 | A |
5349678 | Morris et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352033 | Gresham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359721 | Kempf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361198 | Harmon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371895 | Bristol | Dec 1994 | A |
5381529 | Matsushima et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384910 | Torres | Jan 1995 | A |
5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386417 | Daugherty et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390321 | Proesel | Feb 1995 | A |
5392280 | Zheng | Feb 1995 | A |
5398331 | Huang et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400140 | Johnston et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410141 | Koenck et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410492 | Gross et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410717 | Floro | Apr 1995 | A |
5421017 | Scholz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426732 | Boies et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428769 | Glaser et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428781 | Duault et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432705 | Severt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434952 | Yen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434997 | Landry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437007 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440237 | Brown et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442791 | Wrabetz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444851 | Woest | Aug 1995 | A |
5444861 | Adamec et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450403 | Ichii et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450425 | Gunn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450764 | Johnston et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451939 | Price et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457797 | Butterworth et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459825 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459839 | Swarts et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463735 | Pascucci et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467264 | Rauch et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469570 | Shibata | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5481715 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481741 | McKaskle et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483660 | Yishay et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485617 | Stutz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485620 | Sadre et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490276 | Doli, Jr. et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491625 | Pressnall et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491791 | Glowny et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493534 | Mok | Feb 1996 | A |
5499023 | Goldschmidt | Mar 1996 | A |
5499365 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500934 | Austin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501608 | Scheer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504895 | Kurosawa et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504902 | McGrath et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509811 | Homic | Apr 1996 | A |
5513095 | Pajonk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513192 | Janku et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513354 | Dwork et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517655 | Collins et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519701 | Colmant et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522044 | Pascucci et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526287 | French | Jun 1996 | A |
5526353 | Henley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530643 | Hodorowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5530868 | Record et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531328 | Rochelo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534912 | Kostreski | Jul 1996 | A |
5535425 | Watanabe | Jul 1996 | A |
5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539909 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541810 | Donhauser et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544008 | Dimmick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544073 | Piety et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544321 | Theimer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550980 | Pascucci et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551047 | Mori et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555213 | DeLong | Sep 1996 | A |
5555437 | Packer | Sep 1996 | A |
5555510 | Verseput et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559963 | Gregg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561770 | de Bruijn et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563400 | Le Roux et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564055 | Asnaashari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568378 | Wojsznis | Oct 1996 | A |
5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
5572673 | Shurts | Nov 1996 | A |
5576946 | Bender et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581760 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586066 | White et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586112 | Tabata | Dec 1996 | A |
5586156 | Gaubatz | Dec 1996 | A |
5586329 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586330 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587899 | Ho et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594899 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596752 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598536 | Slaughter, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600845 | Gilson | Feb 1997 | A |
5602749 | Vosburgh | Feb 1997 | A |
5604737 | Iwami et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604871 | Pecone | Feb 1997 | A |
5608607 | Dittmer | Mar 1997 | A |
5608608 | Flint et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611057 | Pecone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613148 | Bezviner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613164 | DiAngelo et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613190 | Hylton | Mar 1997 | A |
5617540 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621890 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623670 | Bohannon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627979 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629872 | Gross et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629949 | Zook | May 1997 | A |
5630056 | Horvath et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630152 | DeLuca et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633811 | Canada et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642259 | Ma et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642511 | Chow et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5648768 | Bouve | Jul 1997 | A |
5649121 | Budman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655092 | Ojala et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659680 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664101 | Picache | Sep 1997 | A |
5664168 | Yishay et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671374 | Postman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671436 | Morris et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676141 | Hollub | Oct 1997 | A |
5680404 | Gray et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680409 | Qin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682476 | Tapperson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687316 | Graziano et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
5701414 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701484 | Artsy | Dec 1997 | A |
5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708709 | Rose | Jan 1998 | A |
5708779 | Graziano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713045 | Berdahl | Jan 1998 | A |
5715178 | Scarola et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716221 | Kantner | Feb 1998 | A |
5717880 | Imai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724025 | Tavori | Mar 1998 | A |
5726911 | Canada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727128 | Morrison | Mar 1998 | A |
5732074 | Spaur et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732218 | Bland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734902 | Atkins et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737529 | Dolin, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740429 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740441 | Yellin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742596 | Baratz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742762 | Scholl et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745049 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748467 | Qin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748912 | Lee | May 1998 | A |
5752007 | Morrison | May 1998 | A |
5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
5752246 | Rogers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754772 | Leaf | May 1998 | A |
5754830 | Butts et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757925 | Faybishenko | May 1998 | A |
5758073 | Liang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758075 | Graziano et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761033 | Wilhelm | Jun 1998 | A |
5761090 | Gross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761405 | Tadamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761421 | van Hoff et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761477 | Wahbe et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764906 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768119 | Havekost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768510 | Gish | Jun 1998 | A |
5774378 | Yang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774670 | Montulli | Jun 1998 | A |
5777874 | Flood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787247 | Norin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787272 | Gupta et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787280 | Joseph et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790791 | Chong et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793963 | Tapperson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794071 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796602 | Wellan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797038 | Crawford et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801770 | Paff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801942 | Nixon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802389 | McNutt | Sep 1998 | A |
5805153 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805922 | Sim et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809247 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812394 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815659 | Umetsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822220 | Baines | Oct 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828851 | Nixon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831669 | Adrain | Nov 1998 | A |
5832268 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835704 | Li et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835712 | DuFresne | Nov 1998 | A |
5835724 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
5835789 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838910 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839094 | French | Nov 1998 | A |
5841360 | Binder et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841654 | Verissimo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841963 | Nakamikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841991 | Russell | Nov 1998 | A |
5844601 | McPheely et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844796 | Araki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844804 | Schussler et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845230 | Lamberson | Dec 1998 | A |
5847957 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848274 | Hamby et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854750 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854944 | Catherwood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862052 | Nixon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864773 | Barna et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867704 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872992 | Tietjen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873089 | Regache | Feb 1999 | A |
5874990 | Kato et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875430 | Koether | Feb 1999 | A |
5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
5880775 | Ross | Mar 1999 | A |
5884014 | Huttenlocher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903455 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905248 | Russell et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905963 | Lysejko et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909586 | Anderson | Jun 1999 | A |
5917822 | Lyles et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917840 | Cheney et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922050 | Madany | Jul 1999 | A |
5928345 | Tetzlaff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930768 | Hooban | Jul 1999 | A |
5940839 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946487 | Dangelo | Aug 1999 | A |
5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956487 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960205 | Mao et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966304 | Cook et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969967 | Aahlad et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974497 | Teshome | Oct 1999 | A |
5975737 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978578 | Azarya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978933 | Wyld et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980090 | Royal, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982362 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982762 | Anzai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988852 | Nakanishi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991795 | Howard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
6006164 | McCarty et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008985 | Lake et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026336 | Sakurai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033257 | Lake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038271 | Olaker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038486 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049578 | Senechal et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052629 | Leatherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070186 | Nishio et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070250 | Yeager et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075863 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076124 | Korowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078848 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085120 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094655 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095674 | Verissimo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104875 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108662 | Hoskins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115744 | Robins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129449 | McCain et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131067 | Girerd et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138140 | Yokote | Oct 2000 | A |
6138174 | Keeley | Oct 2000 | A |
6139177 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148346 | Hanson | Nov 2000 | A |
6148391 | Petrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6151625 | Swales et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160484 | Spahl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167253 | Farris et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170007 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173414 | Zumkehr et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183289 | Lake et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195694 | Chen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195774 | Jacobson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201996 | Crater et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212440 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212608 | Bak | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216158 | Luo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219708 | Martenson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260187 | Cirne | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266724 | Harari et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269473 | Freed et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272529 | Lum | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272556 | Gish | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282454 | Papadopoulos et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311101 | Kastner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314464 | Murata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324607 | Korowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327511 | Naismith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345295 | Beardsley et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345382 | Hughes | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353860 | Hare et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360091 | Schellinger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418499 | Korowitz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424883 | Hosokawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430564 | Judge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438182 | Olaker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449624 | Hammack et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480903 | Voutaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493405 | Olaker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496892 | Lake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499048 | Williams | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532531 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557056 | Lanteigne et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574694 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594692 | Reisman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612022 | Gale et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618754 | Gosling | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640308 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671763 | Korowitz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675193 | Slavin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700869 | Falco et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701284 | Huntley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718533 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760687 | Apel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788980 | Johnson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792321 | Sepe, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799148 | Ling et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799195 | Thibault et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806847 | Nixon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807558 | Hassett et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850973 | Larson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6853867 | Klindt et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6978194 | McIlhany et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7020532 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7089530 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7142322 | Lee | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146231 | Schleiss et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146408 | Crater et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158513 | Wada et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162510 | Jammes | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177052 | Lapstun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199784 | Mathiowetz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245271 | Nixon et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272815 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7275062 | Deitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7337256 | Korowitz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20010025307 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034777 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034778 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034779 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034780 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034781 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044836 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020067370 | Forney et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020133636 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030115238 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030200351 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200369 | Musumeci | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208558 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040103165 | Nixon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117534 | Parry et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070019560 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0411869 | Feb 1991 | EP |
02159526 | Jun 1990 | JP |
09033647 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10019655 | Jan 1998 | JP |
WO-9631047 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9707486 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9726587 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9829804 | Jul 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080148170 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10765006 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11929669 | US | |
Parent | 09379074 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 10765006 | US | |
Parent | 08700199 | Aug 1996 | US |
Child | 09379074 | US |