This disclosure relates generally to a control system for a sensor assembly.
Obstacle and collision avoidance systems can be used to mitigate damage to vehicles and other property due to collisions. Various technologies regarding obstacle and collision avoidance systems can be incorporated into vehicles at a reasonable cost. Some technologies include sensors and digital cameras for sensing and monitoring areas around the vehicle. In some cases, cameras can increase safety by being mounted in locations that can give drivers access to alternative perspectives, which are otherwise diminished or unavailable to the driver's usual view through windows or mirrors.
One example includes a control system for a sensor that includes a contaminant detection sub-system that measures a resonant frequency of the sensor assembly, the sensor assembly including a housing, an actuator and a sensor both disposed in the housing, and a housing cover that enables sensing by the sensor therethrough, the contaminant detection sub-system detects contaminants on an exposed surface of the housing cover and provides a detection signal identifying contaminants on the housing cover based on the resonant frequency of the sensor assembly, and a cleaning sub-system that provides a cleaning control signal to the actuator to expel the contaminants from the housing cover in response to the detection signal.
Another example includes a contaminant sensing system that includes a sensor assembly disposed on an exterior of a vehicle, the sensor assembly including an actuator and a sensor both disposed in a housing that enables sensing by the sensor through the housing, a contaminant detection sub-system that measures a resonant frequency of the sensor assembly, the contaminant detection sub-system to provide a detection signal in response to detecting contaminants on an exposed surface of the housing, a cleaning sub-system that implements expelling the contaminants from the exposed surface in response to the detection signal, and a temperature regulating device that regulates power to the actuator based on a temperature of the actuator.
Another example includes a method of expelling contaminants from a sensor that includes measuring a change in a resonant frequency of a sensor assembly to detect contaminants on an exposed surface of the sensor assembly, measuring a change in the frequency response of the sensor assembly to determine the presence and amount of contaminants on the exposed surface, determining a cleaning mode based on the amount of contaminants on the exposed surface, determining a cleaning phase based on the amount of contaminants on the exposed surface, and generating a cleaning control signal to an actuator of the sensor assembly to expel the contaminants from the exposed surface.
This disclosure relates generally to a sensing and signaling control/monitoring system for sensors (sensor assembly) disposed externally on a vehicle. More specifically, the disclosure relates to a sensing and signaling control/monitoring system for identifying contaminants, cleaning, temperature detection/regulation, fault detection, power regulation, etc. relating to sensors disposed externally on the vehicle. Ultrasound excitation for cleaning sensors provides a more cost effective and efficient approach than water sprayers, mechanical wipers, or air jet solutions. Thus, the sensing and signaling control/monitoring system utilizes an actuator that vibrates the sensor assembly and consequently, drives a contaminant (e.g., water, mist, ice, dirt, mud, etc.) deposited on an exposed surface of a sensor assembly at its resonant frequency so as to facilitate the removal of the contaminant from the exposed surface. More specifically, when the actuator is excited by the proper periodic waveform, the actuator will vibrate the sensor assembly. Properly adjusting the frequency and amplitude of the vibration will expel the contaminant from the exposed surface. Since different contaminant amounts and types result in different resonant frequencies, the actuator can provide a frequency in a range of frequencies that encompass the resonant frequencies of the combined sensor assembly and the amount of contaminant deposited on the exposed surface. Some example actuators include a piezoelectric transducer, a voice coil actuator, etc.
The sensing and signaling control/monitoring system can be utilized with any sensor device disposed externally on the vehicle. For example, some sensor devices include camera systems (e.g., camera monitoring systems (CMS), surround view systems (SVS)), photodetectors, external mirrors, reflectors, lasers (LiDAR). Other types of sensor devices may include short- and long-range radar, near-field transceiver, acoustic sensors or the like. Accordingly, the housing for the lens of cameras or other devices can include an exposed lens cover surface (e.g., camera, reflector, sensor, etc.). Similarly, other types of sensors (different from optical sensors or cameras) also include an external housing to protect the sensing devices from the environment. Each housing has an associated surface through which the signaling and/or sensing are provided to implement the corresponding sensing function (imaging, radar, LiDAR, near-field sensing, etc.). The sensing and signaling control/monitoring system not only cleans the housing, as mentioned above, but also includes components to monitor other environmental or operating parameters for the sensor assembly. Examples of the environmental and operating parameters include temperature detection, fault detection (e.g., monitor the integrity and functionality of the exposed surface), power regulation, etc. The sensing and signaling control/monitoring system thus can extend the mechanical life of the sensor assembly and maintain its surface substantially free of contaminants. The sensing and signaling control/monitoring system may also provide early warnings for potential failures for the sensor assembly.
Referring to
The example sensor assembly 200 illustrated in
Referring to
Still referring to
where k is the effective stiffness of a mechanical system (sensor assembly) expressed in N/m and m is the effective mass of the mechanical system expressed in kg. When contaminants are detected on the exposed surface, the resonant frequency changes from the resonant (natural) frequency of the sensor assembly to a resonant (natural) frequency of both the sensor assembly and the contaminants disposed on the exposed surface. A change in the natural frequency Δωn due to the contaminants disposed on the exposed surface can be represented mathematically by Equation (2):
is a normalized change in natural frequency and
is a normalized change in mass both of which are unitless.
Still referring to
As illustrated in
Still referring to
One example of a faulty actuator that the fault detection sub-system 130 can detect by a frequency response is the de-polarization of the piezoelectric material in a piezoelectric transducer when the transducer overheats. This failure occurs when the temperature of the material exceeds its Curie temperature and occurs when too much current is driven thru the sensor assembly during the cleaning process. Other example failures may include a cracked or broken lens, transducer cracking, seal failure, epoxy failure, etc. Thus, as explained in the previous paragraph, the frequency response for the faulty actuator can be compared to the frequency response when the actuator is not faulty. The frequency response(s) for non-faulty actuators can be stored in a database 180 and accessed to compare the faulty actuator frequency responses to the non-faulty actuator frequency responses.
Referring back to
The cleaning phase selector 144 selects a cleaning phase from multiple cleaning phases (A, B . . . N) within a given cleaning mode based on the amount (e.g., size, mass, weight, volume, etc.) of contaminant disposed on the exposed surface as determined by the contaminant detection sub-system 110 described above. Thus, each cleaning mode can include one or more different cleaning phases depending on the amount of contaminants. Each cleaning phase within a given cleaning mode can provide a different level, intensity or process of cleaning based on the amount of contaminants on the exposed surface. Specifically, each cleaning phase can include one or more different parameters (i, ii . . . n) that define the cleaning process. The cleaning parameters can be defined as a frequency and/or voltage level that excites the actuator at specific resonant frequencies and/or amplitudes, which in turn vibrates the exposed surface thereby expelling contaminants from the exposed surface. Other parameters can include a time period (duration), heat drying, etc. Cleaning the exposed surface with ultrasonic systems and methods is disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/492,286, filed Apr. 20, 2017, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS USING MULTISTAGE ULTRASONIC LENS CLEANING FOR IMPROVED WATER REMOVAL, and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As mentioned above, each cleaning phase can provide a different process of cleaning. For example, larger amounts of contaminants disposed on the exposed surface require a more aggressive cleaning than smaller amounts. For example, if the cleaning mode selector 142 selects a cleaning mode that corresponds to water, the phase selector 144 selects the cleaning phase that includes an appropriate number of cleaning parameters to efficiently expel the water from the exposed surface. More specifically, a first parameter can correspond to a first (high) frequency (e.g., about 300 kHz) that vibrates the actuator and hence, the exposed surface to atomize large water droplets. A second parameter can correspond to a second (lower) frequency (e.g., about 25 kHz) that vibrates the actuator to further expel smaller water droplets. A third parameter can correspond to using the transducer as a heating device to heat dry the remaining water droplets. Thus, during the cleaning process, as the amount of the contaminant on the exposed surface changes (decreases/increases), the cleaning phase and/or the cleaning parameter can change accordingly, (e.g., from a more aggressive cleaning process to a lesser aggressive cleaning process (or vice versa)) to efficiently remove the contaminant from the exposed surface. In other words, the voltage and/or frequency or any other parameter can vary during the cleaning process.
The signal generation device 146 generates a cleaning control signal 148 to an actuator via an actuator interface 150. The cleaning control signal 148 drives the actuator or other cleaning parameter based on the selected cleaning phase and/or cleaning parameters. The cleaning signal may have a predetermined frequency and/or voltage level that drives the actuator at the resonant frequency and/or amplitude to efficiently expel or dissipate the contaminants from the exposed surface. The cleaning signal can dynamically change as the cleaning mode, the cleaning phase, and/or the cleaning parameters dynamically change. As the contaminants begin to dissipate from the exposed surface, the resonant frequency of the exposed surface including the remaining contaminants changes. Thus during dissipation, the resonant frequency is essentially constantly changing. Therefore, as the resonant frequency changes, the cleaning mode, the cleaning phase and/or the cleaning parameters can change to continue efficient dissipation of the contaminants from the exposed surface that corresponds to the changing resonant frequency. In addition, the cleaning signal can be initiated at a first resonant frequency, a second resonant frequency, etc.
Referring back to
In another example, the temperature can be monitored internally by the sensor assembly. For example, the temperature monitoring device 160 can determine the temperature of the actuator and/or sensor assembly by measuring a frequency response of the sensor assembly for different temperatures.
T=−0.29*Z+392.6 (3)
that has a coefficient of determination value of R2=0.9932. As this value approaches unity, the variance between the estimated value using the linear equation and the actual value is minimized.
Referring back to
The controller 170 may further include a data storage device 174 that may store data and/or instructions such as executable program code that is executed by the microprocessor 172. The data storage device 174 may store a number of applications and data that the microprocessor 172 can execute to implement at least the functionality described herein. The data storage device 174 may comprise various types of memory modules, including volatile and nonvolatile memory. For example, the data storage device 174 can include one or more of random-access memory (RAM) 176, read-only memory (ROM) 178, flash solid state drive (SSD) (not shown), and a database 180. Additional devices and/or circuits 182, such as but not limited to pulse-width (PWM) switching controller(s), PWM pre-driver(s), amplifier(s), analog-to-digital convertor(s), multiplexor(s), etc. that facilitate execution of the signals regarding the actuator may be included.
If at 1104 material is detected, the contaminant detection sub-system 110 generates a material detection signal, then at 1112 the frequency response measurement circuit identifies the type of contaminant disposed on the exposed surface. At 1114, the process proceeds to the cleaning sub-system and the cleaning process is performed, which is further described below with reference to
If at 1118 the actuator temperature does not exceed the temperature threshold, then at 1128, a decision is made to determine if the cleaning process is complete. If “YES,” then the process starts again at 1102. If “NO,” then at 1130 the cleaning signal duration is updated and the process loops back to 1104.
What have been described above are examples of the disclosure. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methods for purposes of describing the disclosure, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosure are possible. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of this application, including the appended claims.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/454,154 filed on Feb. 3, 2017 and entitled SIGNALING AND SENSING FRAMEWORK FOR A LENS COVER SYSTEM, which is incorporated by references herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3681626 | Puskas | Aug 1972 | A |
4019073 | Vishnevsky et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4271371 | Furuichi et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4556467 | Kuhn et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4607652 | Yung | Aug 1986 | A |
4691725 | Parisi | Sep 1987 | A |
4710233 | Hohmann et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4836684 | Javorik et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4852592 | DeGangi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870982 | Liu | Oct 1989 | A |
5005015 | Dehn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5071776 | Matsushita et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5113116 | Wilson | May 1992 | A |
5178173 | Erickson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5853500 | Joshi | Dec 1998 | A |
6064259 | Takita | May 2000 | A |
6607606 | Bronson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7705517 | Koen et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
8286801 | Youngs | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8293026 | Bodor et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8494200 | Ram | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8899761 | Tonar et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9070856 | Rose et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9080961 | Adachi | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084053 | Parkins | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095882 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9226076 | Lippert et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9253297 | Abe et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9573165 | Weber | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20060285108 | Morrisroe | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070046143 | Blandino | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070159422 | Blandino | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080198458 | Kashiyama | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080248416 | Norikane | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100171872 | Okano | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110073142 | Hattori et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130170685 | Oh | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130242481 | Kim | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130333978 | Abe | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140033454 | Koops et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140218877 | Wei | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253150 | Menzel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150277100 | Novoselov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160266379 | Li et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170361360 | Li et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180085784 | Fedigan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180085793 | Fedigan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180117642 | Magee et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180239218 | Ikeuchi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180264526 | Kim | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275397 | Chung et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180304282 | Cook | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180304318 | Revier | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180326462 | Revier | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190277787 | Chung et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1703062 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2479595 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2777579 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2873572 | May 2015 | EP |
2009283069 | Dec 2009 | JP |
5608688 | Oct 2014 | JP |
20130076250 | Jul 2013 | KR |
2007005852 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2010104867 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2018207041 | Nov 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/016714, dated Jun. 21, 2018 (2 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/059536 dated Feb. 28, 2018. |
Vaseiljev, “Ultrasonic system for solar panel cleaning”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 200, Oct. 1, 2013, pp. 74-78. |
Kazemi, “Substrate cleaning using ultrasonics/megasonics,” 2011 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2011, pp. 1-6. |
Brereton, “Particle Removal by Focused Ultrasound”, Journal of Sound and Vibration vol. 173, Issue 5, Jun. 23, 1994, pp. 683-698. |
Gale, “Removal of Particulate Contaminants using Ultrasonics and Megasonics: A Review”, Particulate Science and Technology, 1994, 13:3-4, 197-211. |
Lee, “Smart self-cleaning cover glass for automotive miniature cameras,” 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Shanghai, 2016, pp. 83-86. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/064530 dated Apr. 5, 2018. |
Graff, “Wave Motion in Elastic Solids”, Dover, 1991 (3 pages). |
Hagedorn et al., “Travelling Wave Ultrasonic Motors, Part I: Working Principle and Mathematical Modelling of the Stator”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1992, 155(1), pp. 31-46. |
Ziaei-Moayyed et al., “Electrical Deflection of Polar Liquid Streams: A Misunderstood Demonstration,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 77, No. 11, Nov. 2000 (4 pages). |
Howard, “High speed photography of ultrasonic atomization,” Thesis, Brown University, May 13, 2010 (39 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,315, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Ultrasonic Lens Cleaner Using Configurable Filter Banks,” filed Apr. 20, 2017 (63 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,286, entitled “Methods and Apparatus Using Multistage Ultrasonic Lens Cleaning for Improved Water Removal,” filed Apr. 20, 2017 (62 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,433, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Surface Wetting Control,” filed Apr. 20, 2017 (46 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,395, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Electrostatic Control of Expelled Material from Lens Cleaners,” filed Apr. 20, 2017 (28 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for 17866470.2 dated Oct. 8, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report for 17878085.4 dated Nov. 22, 2019. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for 18747814.4 dated Jan. 30, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180221921 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62454154 | Feb 2017 | US |