The present invention relates to a control system for suppression of boom oscillations affecting a working apparatus.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a working apparatus having a first source of pressurized hydraulic fluid; an operator control unit; a boom arm; a boom cylinder coupled to the boom arm, the cylinder having a first chamber and a second chamber; a main control valve selectively directing pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first source to the first and second chambers in response to manipulation of the operator control unit to selectively raise and lower the arm; a first pressure sensor and a second pressure sensor detecting hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers, respectively, and generating signals in reference to the amount of hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers, respectively; and a controller receiving the signals from the pressure sensors, processing the signals to predict boom oscillations, and operating the main control valve to help prevent the predicted boom oscillations.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a working apparatus having a first source of pressurized hydraulic fluid; an operator control unit; a boom arm; a boom cylinder coupled to the boom arm; the cylinder having a first chamber and a second chamber; a main control valve selectively directing pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first source to the first and second chambers in response to manipulation of the operator control unit to selectively raise and lower the arm; a first pressure sensor and a second pressure sensor detecting hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers, respectively, and generating signals in reference to the amount of hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers, respectively; a controller receiving the signals from the pressure sensors, processing the signals to monitor operation of the cylinder and arm, and generating a control signal when the signals are indicative of impending boom oscillations; and a controller valve overriding the operator control unit and manipulating the main control valve to help prevent boom oscillations in response to receiving the control signal.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of inhibiting boom oscillations in a working apparatus having a boom arm coupled to a boom cylinder having first and second chambers, a main control valve, and an operator control unit permitting an operator to manipulate the main control valve to direct hydraulic fluid into one of the first and second chambers to selectively raise and lower the arm. The method comprises (a) detecting pressure of hydraulic fluid in the first and second chambers of the boom cylinder; (b) generating first and second chamber signals in reference to the hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers, respectively; (c) comparing the first and second chamber signals to parameters; (d) predicting boom oscillations based on the comparison of step (c); (e) generating a control signal in response to predicting boom oscillations; and (f) overriding operation of the control unit to manipulate the main control valve and help prevent predicted boom oscillations in response to creating the control signal.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a control for a working apparatus having an arm, the control including a controller operable to receive at least one signal from a first pressure sensor that is operable to detect a pressure in a first chamber of a control valve, and at least one signal from a second pressure sensor that is operable to detect a pressure in a second chamber of the control valve, wherein the controller is operable to process the at least one signal from each of the first and second sensors, and to control the control valve to help prevent oscillations of the arm.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method for inhibiting arm oscillations in an apparatus having an arm, the method including generating a first signal indicative of pressure in a first chamber; generating a second signal indicative of pressure in a second chamber; comparing the first signal to the second signal; predicting arm oscillations based on the comparison of the first signal to the second signal; and generating a control signal in response to predicting the arm oscillations.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “mounted,” “connected,” “supported,” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings, respectively. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings.
The excavator 10 may experience oscillations, particularly boom oscillations, as a result of operating the boom arm 16 with the boom cylinder 22. An operator in the control station 19 manipulates the hydraulic system 28 to operate the boom cylinder 22 raising and lowering the boom arm 16. The inertial force of the boom arm 16 and the assembly 13 produced by the boom arm 16 rapidly ceasing motion or changing direction, can cause boom oscillations that affect the excavator 10. The control system 31 coupled to the hydraulic system 28 is operable to predict oscillations and operate the hydraulic system 28 to help prevent the boom oscillations from occurring. In alternate embodiments, the control system may be used in different machines. For example, the control system 31 may by used in robots. Robotic arms may include a hydraulic system to raise and lower an end effector in a manner similar to the excavator 10. Thus, it is to be understood that the control system is not restricted to excavators 10 and that the invention may encompass implementing the control system in other devices.
The control system 31 comprises a first pressure sensor 58, a second pressure sensor 61, a controller valve 64, a relay switch 67, and a controller 70, such as a digital signal processor, microprocessor, or other device. The first and second pressure sensors 58 and 61 detect hydraulic pressure, and generate signals representative of the hydraulic pressure in the first and second chambers 49 and 52, respectively. The controller 70 receives the signals generated by the first and second sensors 58 and 61, and processes the signals to predict boom oscillations. The operator in the control station 19 selectively opens or closes the relay switch 67 connecting the controller 70 and the controller valve 64 to disable or enable the control system 31, respectively. The controller 70 sends a control signal to the controller valve 64 generated in response to predicting boom oscillations when the relay switch 67 is in a closed position. The controller valve 64, illustrated in
As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, the controller 70 identifies two cases in which the operation of the boom cylinder 22 causes boom oscillations. The identification is made based on the detected pressures in the first and second chambers 49 and 52. The pressure reading from the first pressure sensor 58 (“S1”) and the pressure reading from the second pressure sensor 61 (“S2”) are compared to a first parameter (“C1”) and a second parameter (“C2”) to determine cases (which on one embodiment are case 1 and case 2) when operating the hydraulic system 28 causes boom oscillations. In case 1, the value of S2 is subtracted from S1(S1−S2) and the difference is compared to C1. If the difference is less than C1, it is assumed that the boom arm 16 has been raised and rapidly stopped or reversed in direction. In case 2, the difference S1−S2 is compared to C2. If the difference is greater than C2, it is assumed that the boom arm 16 has been lowered and rapidly stopped or reversed in direction. The controller 70 generates the control signal when cases 1 and 2 are identified. Thus, the controller valve 64 overrides the operation of the MCV 40 (illustrated in
The control signal is generated until the difference of S1−S2 is greater than C1 and less than C2. The values C1 and C2 can be determined by following a testing procedure. The testing procedure can be conformed to a particular type of excavator 10, and may include deliberately causing boom oscillations and measuring the pressure in the first and second chambers 49 and 52. A first testing procedure may include raising and stopping the boom arm. This causes a rapid drop of pressure in the first chamber 49 and a rapid increase of pressure in the second chamber 52. A second testing procedure may include lowering and stopping the boom arm. This causes a rapid increase of pressure in the first chamber 49 and a rapid decrease of pressure in the second chamber 52. In particular, the first testing procedure indicates that boom oscillations may occur when the difference S1−S2 is less than a first critical value. In addition, the second testing procedure indicates that boom oscillations may occur when the difference S1−S2 is greater than a second critical value. Thus, the first and second testing procedures help determining the values of C1 and C2, respectively. The first and second testing procedures usually yield different values of C1 and C2 based of the type of excavator 10 being tested. However, the values of C1 and C2 are generally constant for excavators 10 of the same type.
Alternatively, the operator can modify the values of C1 and C2 to accommodate for an individual manner of operating the excavator 10. For example,
The controller 70 is configured to sense when the operator manipulates the control lever 46 between the first and second positions 73 and 76 based on the pressure readings generated by the fourth pressure sensor 82 (“S3”) and the third pressure sensor 79 (“S4”), respectively. The controller 70 generates the control signal when identifying case 1 and a change in the signal S3 or when identifying case 2 and a change in the signal S4.
After the controller 70 receives the signals S1 and S2 (at step 185), as illustrated in
After the controller 70 sets the value of the boom_up lever flag to 0 (at step 220) as illustrated in
For example, if the controller 70 reads the signal S3 (at step 150) and senses the operator manipulating the control lever 46 to the second position 76 (at step 155), the values of M3, boom_up lever flag, and boom_down level flag are set to ‘up’, 1, and 0, respectively (at step 160). Since the signal S3 indicates that the boom arm is up, the value of M4 is set to ‘neutral’ (at step 180). The controller 70 then senses signals S1 and S2 (at step 185), and subtracts S2 from S1 (at step 200) to identify case 1 (at step 205). The value of S1−S2 may not be less than C1 when the operator manipulates the control lever 46 to the second position 76. Thus, the controller 70 proceeds to the processes of subroutine 3 (at step 225). The controller 70 calculates S1−S2 (at step 250), and compares the difference to C2 (at step 255). If the conditions for case 2 are met (at step 255), the controller 70 checks whether the values of M4 and the boom_down lever flag are ‘neutral’ and 0, respectively (at step 260). The controller 70 proceeds to subroutine 2 (at step 275) and subsequently to subroutine 1 (at step 230) to sense signals S3 and S4 (at step 150).
In response to the operator stopping or reversing direction of the control lever 46, the controller 70 senses a very low or non existent signal S3 (at step 155), thereby setting the value of M3 to ‘neutral’ (at step 165). The controller 70 can carry out the operations described in
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, a control system 31 coupled to a hydraulic system 28 operable to help predict and prevent boom oscillations. Various features of the embodiments are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 USC 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/687,077 filed Jun. 3, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4586332 | Schexnayder | May 1986 | A |
4718329 | Nakajima et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4863337 | Ishiguro et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5048296 | Sunamura et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5540049 | Lunzman | Jul 1996 | A |
5832730 | Mizui | Nov 1998 | A |
5873245 | Kato et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887390 | Schulz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6354790 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6408622 | Tsuruga et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422804 | Gitter | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6474064 | Heyne et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520731 | MacLeod | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6532738 | Sharkness et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6553278 | Handroos et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6640409 | Sharkness et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647721 | Heyne et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666125 | Gunzenhauser | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6705079 | Tabor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6883532 | Rau | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6941687 | Sharkness et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7032332 | Sharkness et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060272325 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60687077 | Jun 2005 | US |