This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2012/005234, entitled “Steuersystem,” filed Dec. 18, 2012, which claims priority from German Patent Application No. DE 10 2011 121 775.8, filed Dec. 21, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a control system for driving a motorized closure element of a motor vehicle and also to a method for operating a control system of this kind.
Modern motor vehicles are increasingly being equipped with motor-operated closure elements. Said closure elements may be, for example, doors such as side and rear doors, in particular sliding doors, hatches, in particular tailgates, trunk lids, engine hoods, cargo space floors or the like, of a motor vehicle. In this respect, the term “closure element” has a broad meaning in the present case.
One convenience function which is becoming increasingly important today is the automatic operation of the motorized tailgate of a motor vehicle. In the case of the known control system (DE 20 2005 020 140 U1) on which the invention is based, provision is made for an operator control event which is performed by the operator, in this case a foot movement which is performed by the operator, to prompt motorized opening of the tailgate.
A drive arrangement which is associated with the tailgate, a sensor control means and also a distance sensor are provided for this purpose. The sensor control means monitors the sensor signals in order to check whether the abovementioned operator control event is occurring. The drive arrangement is accordingly driven depending on the result of this operator control event monitoring operation.
Capacitive distance sensors which are equipped with at least one measurement electrode can be used in order to detect the abovementioned operator control events. In this case, an operator control event triggers a change in capacitance of the electrode arrangement, it being possible for this change in capacitance to be easily detected in an electronic manner. A measurement electrode of this kind is generally integrated into the rear skirt of a motor vehicle and extends over the entire width of the motor vehicle.
Difficulties can arise when vehicle components, in particular add-on parts, interfere with detection of the operator control events by sensor or are simply in the way of the measurement electrode. Vehicle components of this kind may be trailer couplings, bicycle mounts, exhaust gas systems or the like.
The invention is based on the problem of designing and developing the known control system in such a way that any possible interference in the detection of operator control events by sensor by specific vehicle components is prevented.
According to the proposal, it has been identified that the at least one distance sensor of the control system can be structurally designed such that its sensor operation is not adversely affected or is only slightly adversely affected by the interfering vehicle component.
Specifically, the distance sensor has a blind section in the region of the vehicle component, said blind section having no sensitivity or a lower level of sensitivity compared to that region of the distance sensor which adjoins the blind section.
In this case, the term “sensitivity” is to be understood in the broadest sense in such a way that a change in the sensitivity given the same distance from the user always results in a corresponding change in the sensor signal. The formulation “no sensitivity” means, in the above sense, that no detection by sensor at all takes place in the blind section.
The term “blind section” is likewise to be understood in the broadest sense. As indicated above, said term covers not only a section which has absolutely no sensitivity, that is to say there is no detection by sensor, but also a section with a comparatively low level of sensitivity.
The proposed solution ensures a high degree of robustness in respect of any possible interference with the sensor by the vehicle component in question and can be realized in an extremely simple manner.
The distance sensor is equipped with a blind section which is associated with the vehicle component, said blind section being designed such that the vehicle component cannot be detected by the distance sensor and accordingly does not cause any interference in the detection of the distance from a user by sensor.
In an embodiment, the blind section has a shield which shields the region of the vehicle component in respect of detection by sensor. A shield of this type can, in principle, cause the above reduction in sensitivity.
In an embodiment which can be easily realized from a structural point of view, the blind section is an interruption in the distance sensor along the sensor extent, with the result that a sensor module is arranged on either side of the vehicle component. This interruption in the distance sensor is particularly advantageous in as much as the vehicle component can be readily accommodated within the blind section without causing structural overlapping between the vehicle component and the distance sensor.
According an embodiment, a motor vehicle comprising a motorized closure element, such as comprising a motorized tailgate, a motorized side door, a motorized sliding door or the like, said motor vehicle being equipped with a control system as proposed above. Reference may be made to all embodiments which are suitable for describing the proposed motor vehicle.
According to an embodiment, a method for operating a proposed control system is disclosed.
According to this further teaching, it is essential for a longitudinal movement by the user along the sensor extent of the at least one distance sensor through the blind section of said distance sensor to produce a pattern in the profile of the sensor signal with respect to time, which pattern is detected by the control system at least as part of an operator control event. Specifically, it is then possible to detect not only a distance from a user, but rather a movement direction by the user along the sensor extent. In this respect, reference may be made to all of the statements made in relation to the proposed control system.
In an embodiment, the invention includes a control system for driving a motorized closure element of a motor vehicle, wherein, in order to detect operator control events, at least one sensor control means and at least one elongate distance sensor which extends along a sensor extent are provided, wherein the sensor control means drives the associated distance sensor and/or evaluates the sensor signals from said distance sensor, and wherein the distance sensor detects a distance from a user, wherein, with the control system installed, a vehicle component is arranged or can be arranged in or along the sensor extent, and in that the distance sensor is designed such that it has a blind section in the region of the vehicle component, said blind section having no sensitivity or a lower level of sensitivity compared to that region of the distance sensor which adjoins the blind section and in that, owing to the blind section the vehicle component cannot be detected by the distance sensor and does not cause any interference in the detection of the distance from a user by sensor.
In an embodiment, at least two elongate distance sensors are provided, said distance sensors extending substantially parallel in relation to one another.
In an embodiment, the at least one distance sensor is designed as a capacitive sensor with an elongate measurement electrode.
In an embodiment, the extent of the blind section along the sensor extent is at least 5% of the total length of the distance sensor.
In an embodiment, the blind section has a shield which shields the region of the vehicle component in respect of detection by sensor.
In an embodiment, the blind section is an interruption in the distance sensor along the sensor extent, with the result that a sensor module is arranged on either side of the vehicle component.
In an embodiment, the sensor modules of a distance sensor which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component make electrical contact with one another.
In an embodiment, a separate sensor control means is associated with each of the sensor modules of a distance sensor which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component, or in that a common sensor control means is associated with the sensor modules of a distance sensor which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component.
In an embodiment, a common sensor control means is associated with the sensor modules of the at least two distance sensors, which sensor modules are arranged on one side of the vehicle component.
In an embodiment, the distance sensor is arranged in or on a vehicle body part.
In an embodiment, a motor vehicle comprises a motorized closure element, in particular comprising a motorized tailgate, a motorized side door, a motorized sliding door or the like, and comprising a control system for driving the motorized closure element as disclosed herein.
In an embodiment the invention provides a method for operating a control system as disclosed herein, wherein a longitudinal movement by the user along the sensor extent of the at least one distance sensor through the blind section of said distance sensor produces a pattern in the profile of the sensor signal with respect to time, which pattern is detected by the control system at least as part of an operator control event.
In an embodiment, the vehicle component comprises a trailer coupling or the like.
In an embodiment, the extent of the blind section along the sensor extent is at least 10%, of the total length of the distance sensor.
In an embodiment, the vehicle body part comprises a front, rear or side skirt.
In an embodiment, the distance sensor extends at least over the substantial width of the vehicle body part.
The invention will be explained in greater detail below with reference to a drawing which illustrates only one exemplary embodiment and in which
The proposed control system will be explained below with reference to a motorized closure element 1 of a motor vehicle, which closure element is designed as a tailgate.
The design of the closure element 1 can include a tailgate of a motor vehicle. However, reference may be made to the introductory part of the description in respect of the broad meaning of the term “closure element”. In this respect, all of the statements made in relation to a tailgate 1 correspondingly apply for all other types of closure elements.
The tailgate 1 has an associated drive arrangement 2 by means of which the tailgate 1 can be adjusted in a motorized manner between the closed position, which is illustrated using solid lines in
A sensor control means 3 which serves to detect operator control events and, on the basis of these, driving of the motorized tailgate 1, is also provided. In an embodiment, the at least one sensor control means 3 has an associated superordinate tailgate control device 4 which communicates with a central vehicle control means or the like via a bus system 5. The actual extraction of operator control events from the sensor signals, in particular a corresponding pattern identification, can be performed in the tailgate control device 4. However, it is also feasible for this to be performed at least partially, in particular for the purpose of signal pre-processing, in the at least one sensor control means 3.
The sensor signals which are to be evaluated can be traced back to at least one elongate distance sensor 6, 7, in this case to precisely two elongate distance sensors 6, 7 which run parallel in relation to one another and each extend along a sensor extent. The sensor extent can be straight, bent, circular or the like.
Precisely two distance sensors 6, 7 are provided, said distance sensors extending, as indicated above, substantially parallel in relation to one another. In principle, it is also feasible for more than two elongate distance sensors 6, 7 to be provided. In the present case, only one single distance sensor 6, 7 is described at certain points, the intention being to simplify said description. All of the statements made in this respect correspondingly apply for the respectively second distance sensor 6, 7.
As indicated above, the task of the at least one sensor control means 3 is to drive the associated distance sensor 6, 7 and/or to evaluate the sensor signals from said distance sensor. The at least one distance sensor 6, 7 is designed such that a distance a from a user B can be detected using said distance sensor.
Looking at
However, in an embodiment, the at least one distance sensor 6, 7 is designed such that it has a blind section 6a, 7a in the region of the vehicle component 8, said blind section having no sensitivity. This is realized by an interruption in the distance sensor 6, 7 in the region of the vehicle component 8, as will be explained below. However, in principle, it is also feasible for the blind section 6a, 7a to have a lower level of sensitivity compared to that region of the distance sensor 6, 7 which adjoins the blind section 6a, 7a, as will likewise be explained below. Therefore, the interfering influence of the vehicle component 8 on the operation of the sensor is reduced in each case.
In an embodiment, the at least one distance sensor 6, 7 is designed such that it has a blind section 6a, 7a which is associated with the vehicle component 8 and, as a result, the vehicle component 8 cannot be detected by the distance sensor 6, 7. Accordingly, the vehicle component 8 cannot cause any interference in the detection of the distance a to a user B by sensor either. The blind section 6a, 7a ensures that the interfering influence of the vehicle component 8 on the respective measurement result is suppressed to a certain extent. In the present case, the expressions “cannot be detected” and “no interference” are not intended to be understood in an ideal sense in respect of the relatively harsh measurement conditions, but rather such that, in this variant, the vehicle component 8 does not have any appreciable effect on the operation of the sensor through the blind section.
The illustrated design of the distance sensor 6, 7 as a capacitive sensor has proven suitable in practice. However, it is advantageously also possible to use an inductive sensor. Other sensor principles can also be used in principle. It is feasible, for example, for the distance sensor 6, 7 to be a magnetic sensor.
The capacitive distance sensor 6, 7 has an associated elongate measurement electrode 9, 10; 11, 12 which extends along the respective sensor extent.
In a design which is simple to realize, the blind section 6a, 7a has a shield which shields the region of the vehicle component 8 in respect of detection by sensor. The shield can be provided, for example, by a kind of metal screen, a metal casing or the like.
However, in an embodiment, the blind section 6a, 7a is an abovementioned interruption in the distance sensor 6, 7 along the sensor extent, with the result that a sensor module 6b, 6c; 7b, 7c is arranged on either side of the vehicle component 8. The sensor modules 6b, 6c, 7b, 7c each have an associated measurement electrode 9, 10, 11, 12, as can be seen in the illustration according to
Driving of the sensor modules 6b, 6c, 7b, 7c is highly significant in the present case.
In a particularly simple variant, the sensor modules 6b, 6c; 7b, 7c of a distance sensor 6, 7 which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component 8 make electrical contact with one another. This means that the measurement electrodes 9, 10 and the measurement electrodes 11, 12 make electrical contact with one another, as can be seen in the illustration according to
However, it is also feasible for a separate sensor control means 3 to be associated with each of the sensor modules 6b, 6c; 7b, 7c of a distance sensor 6, 7 which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component 8. By way of example, a dedicated sensor control means 3 can be associated with each measurement electrode 9, 10, 11, 12. However, it is also feasible for a common sensor control means 3 to be associated with the sensor modules 6b, 6c; 7b, 7c of a distance sensor 6, 7 which are arranged on either side of the vehicle component 8.
In the design which is illustrated in
Finally, it is feasible for all of the measurement electrodes 9, 10, 11, 12 of the distance sensors 6, 7 to be connected to a sensor control means 3 separately. This is illustrated in
Depending on the structure of the control means, the measurement electrodes 9, 10, 11, 12 can be electrically connected at least partially via plug connections, before connection to the sensor control means 3. As illustrated in the drawing, it is also feasible for each measurement electrode 9, 10, 11, 12 to be connected to the respective sensor control means 3 individually.
Since the distance sensors 6, 7 are not homogeneous along their sensor extent, but rather had been provided with the blind section 6a, 7a, a longitudinal movement by the user along the sensor extent has an effect on the measurement results. This can be utilized when detecting the operator control events, as will be explained below.
The illustrated motor vehicle is equipped with a vehicle body part 13 which may be, for example, a front/rear or side skirt. In the mounted state, the distance sensors 6, 7 are arranged in or behind the vehicle body part 13. In the vehicle body part 13 which is illustrated here and is designed as a rear skirt, the distance sensor 6, 7 can extend at least over the substantial width of the vehicle body part 13.
As explained above, the proposed solution can be used in all types of closure elements 1. The proposed solution can also be used to detect all types of user movements.
According to a further teaching, which has independent significance, a motor vehicle comprising a motorized closure element 1, in particular comprising a motorized tailgate, a motorized side door, a motorized sliding door or the like, is claimed, said motor vehicle being equipped with a proposed control system for driving the motorized closure element 1. Reference may be made to all of the statements made in relation to the proposed control system.
According to a further teaching which likewise has independent significance, a method for operating the proposed control system is claimed. The significant feature in the method is that a longitudinal movement by the user along the sensor extent of the at least one distance sensor 6, 7 through the blind section 6a, 7a of said distance sensor produces a pattern in the profile of the sensor signal with respect to time, said pattern being detected by the control system at least as part of an operator control event.
In an embodiment, which can best be realized with the design according to
In some embodiment according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 121 775 | Dec 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/005234 | 12/18/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/091839 | 6/27/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2127359 | Harley | Aug 1938 | A |
5351519 | Kress et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5394292 | Hayashida | Feb 1995 | A |
5844486 | Barron et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5959456 | Whorlow et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6275146 | Kithil et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6337549 | Bledin | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6478357 | Zhou | Nov 2002 | B2 |
7217891 | Fischer et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7688013 | Frommer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7768272 | Kato et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7880481 | Zangl et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8027769 | Zander et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8225458 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8284022 | Kachouh | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8606467 | Gehin | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8692565 | Togura | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8723532 | Asjes et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8788152 | Reimann et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8823394 | Reime | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8966825 | Uebelein et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8970232 | Kandler | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9081032 | Lange | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9274154 | Togura | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9283994 | Holzberg et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9290982 | Schuetz et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9304156 | Weingaertner et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9541590 | Geuther et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9543674 | Wuerstlein et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9574388 | Ebert | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585280 | Wuerstlein et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9587417 | Van Gastel | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9689982 | Herthan | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9702682 | Kuhnen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9731627 | Lamesch et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9845629 | Washeleski | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9939956 | Roziere et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9995601 | Wuerstlein et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10107851 | Reimann | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20020030666 | Philipp et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020143452 | Losey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040085079 | Lin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040178924 | Gifford et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050114276 | Hunter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050231194 | Baldi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060267374 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293800 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072154 | Akatsuka et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070102220 | Kiribayashi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070296242 | Frommer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080068145 | Weghaus et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088188 | Busch et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122454 | Kato | May 2008 | A1 |
20080195273 | Matsuura et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211519 | Kurumado et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080303685 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090222174 | Frommer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243826 | Touge et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100079283 | Hammerschmidt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100256875 | Gehin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259283 | Togura | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100289506 | Moon et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110118946 | Reimann | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133756 | Reime | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110234370 | Briese et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110254572 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276234 | Van Gastel | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313619 | Washeleski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120188078 | Soles et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120290177 | Wagenhuber et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130187664 | Deumal Herraiz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193989 | Kuhnen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207677 | Togura | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234733 | Lange et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130234828 | Holzberg et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130311039 | Washeleski | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321006 | Weingaertner et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140032055 | Holzberg et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140195073 | Herthan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140285217 | Van Gastel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324273 | Russ et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140373447 | Gunreben | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150012176 | Schindler et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019085 | Ma | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035549 | Sugiura | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150070033 | Pohl et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150128497 | Schuetz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134208 | Gunreben | May 2015 | A1 |
20150176322 | Wuerstlein | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150176323 | Ebert | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150176324 | Ebert | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150219703 | Geuther et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150233167 | Natsui | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150241195 | Schenkewitz et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150258879 | Mandzak | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150267454 | Wuerstlein et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150330767 | Pohl et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150345205 | Gunreben | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160043486 | Wuerstlein et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057882 | Wuerstlein et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160245671 | Wuerstlein et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160265263 | Motoki | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170138997 | Wuerstlein et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170190309 | Herthan | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170235413 | Koizumi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241187 | Takayanagi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4408468 | Sep 1995 | DE |
10235925 | Feb 2004 | DE |
10254708 | Jun 2004 | DE |
102004055982 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102004057220 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102005042402 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102005055002 | May 2007 | DE |
10158533 | Feb 2009 | DE |
102009004384 | Jul 2009 | DE |
102008041354 | Feb 2010 | DE |
102009041555 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102009047066 | May 2011 | DE |
102009055778 | Jun 2011 | DE |
102010048144 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102010006213 | Aug 2011 | DE |
102010002559 | Sep 2011 | DE |
102010037577 | Mar 2012 | DE |
102011112274 | Mar 2013 | DE |
102012104915 | Dec 2013 | DE |
102012013065 | Jan 2014 | DE |
102013112418 | May 2015 | DE |
102013114881 | Jun 2015 | DE |
0711977 | May 1996 | EP |
1422366 | May 2004 | EP |
2740501 | Apr 1997 | FR |
2943190 | Sep 2010 | FR |
2376075 | Dec 2002 | GB |
02055168 | Feb 1990 | JP |
6018547 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2007228640 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2009079353 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2010236184 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2005084979 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007006514 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007006514 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2010060767 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010076332 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011092206 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012052210 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012084111 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013000805 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013034252 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013091839 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Written Opinion for PCT/EP2012/005234 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, completed Jun. 7, 2014 (10 pages). |
Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & CO.KG, “Sesam oeffne Dich. In: AutomobilKONSTRUKTION,” Feb. 2012 (pp. 50-51), with English translation (4 pages). |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 13713812.2 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163 dated Oct. 31, 2013 (3 pages). |
German Search Report for German Patent Application No. 102013114883.2, dated Feb. 4, 2014 (5 pages). |
German Search Report for DE Application No. 102011112274.9 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated May 9, 2012 (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2013/063905 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Aug. 1, 2013 (8 pages) [English Translation]. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/EP2013/066998 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated Oct. 26, 2012 (6 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2012/005234 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, dated Jun. 14, 2013 (3 pages). |
Non Final Office Action Citation for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Feb. 1, 2016 (15 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated Feb. 11, 2016 (23 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated Dec. 17, 2014 (31 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Apr. 11, 2016 (20 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,441, dated Jun. 3, 2016 (10 pages). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated Nov. 6, 2015 (13 pages). |
Office Action for KR Patent Application No. 10-2013-0087175 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163 completed Jan. 21, 2015 (13 pages). |
Search Report for German Application No. 102012014676.0 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated Jan. 18, 2013 (5 pages). |
Search Report for German Patent Application No. 102012013065.1 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Jun. 28, 2013 (5 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,913 dated Nov. 30, 2018 (30 pages). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,913 dated May 10, 2019 (25 pages). |
Opposition Proceedings mailed on Mar. 29, 2019, for EP16195945.7 (related to U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,913), 5 pages. |
Response to Non-Final Rejection dated Nov. 30, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,913, submitted via EFS-WEB on Feb. 28, 2019, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140373447 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |