The present invention relates to improvements to control systems for a rotary blood pump.
To treat cardiac insufficiency or failure, heart assist devices have been used to assist the heart of a patient. These heart assist devices include various pumping devices. A high level of success has been attributed to a particular group of heart assist devices called rotary blood pumps.
In the past, the rotary blood pumps have used control systems which set the pumping speed at a constant rate. This constant rate would not change for the physiological demands of the patient. Therefore, if a patient was exercising the physiological demands for increased blood supply would not be offset by a matched increased pulping rote or speed of the rotary blood pump.
Therefore, there is a need for a control system that allows a rotary blood pump to match the physiological needs of a patient.
Rotary blood pumps also usually provide a continuous flow which is additionally pulsed by the residual function of the patient's heart. Rotary blood pumps operating at predetermined fixed pumping rate often tend to over-pump or under-pump blood from the ventricle depending on the physiological needs of the patient and this may lead to deleterious effects on the patient including, but not limited to, suction events or ventricular collapse. Suction events occur where the pressure within a ventricle is less than the intrathoracic pressure around the heart. The net result is a partial or complete collapse of the ventricle.
The present invention aims to or at least address or ameliorate one or more of the disadvantages associated with the above mentioned prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.
In accordance with a first aspect, the present invention consists of a control system for a rotary blood pump adapted to move blood in a patient, the control system comprising a means for measuring and varying the speed of the pump and a means for measuring the pulsatility index of a patient, the control system adapted to maintain the pulsatility index at or near a predetermined value by varying the speed of the pump, and the pulsatility index is derived from the amplitude of the actual pump speed over a predetermined time period.
Preferably, the predetermined time period is about 40 milliseconds. Preferably, the predetermined value is between 20 to 45 units.
Preferably, the control system calculates the second derivative of instantaneous speed of the rotary blood pump and uses the calculation of the second derivative of instantaneous speed detect a suction event.
Preferably, the control system determines imminence of a suction event based on the stroke work. Preferably, the target speed is pulsed in cooperation with the heart. Preferably, the control system includes a selective mode that minimises target pump speed to achieve forward blood flow through both the pump and aortic valve, whilst avoiding retrograde flow. Preferably, the selective mode sets target speed at about 1250 rpm.
Preferably, the control system calculates or detects fell ventricular pressure with respect to time. Preferably, the control system uses the pulsatility index to derive preload. Preferably, the control system maintains the preload within a predetermined range by adjusting target speed. Preferably, the control system mimics starling curve responses of a natural heart. Preferably, the control system uses preload to mimic starling curve responses of a natural heart.
In accordance with a second aspect, the present invention consists of a control system for use with rotary blood pumps, wherein the control system includes a selective mode that minimises target pump speed to achieve forward blood flow through both the pump and aortic valve, whilst avoiding retrograde flow.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
In a first preferred embodiment of the present invention, as depicted in
The control system 1 may include several steps or modules to control the target speed of the rotary blood pump 2. Preferably, the control system 1 includes a commutation module 3. The commutation module 3 provides the rotary blood pump 2 with an electromagnetic drive signal to rotate a rotor or impeller (not shown) positioned within the rotary blood pump 2. The commutation module 3 also may detect the actual pumping speed or the actual speed of rotation of the impeller within the rotary blood pump 2 using back EMF detection.
The actual pumping speed may then be used by the control system 1 to derive or calculate a Pulsatility Index (‘PI’) and this is depicted as step 4 in
The control system 1 then may also derive or calculate Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (“PCWP”), which also can be referred to as “preload”, from a look-up table of set values or from an equation. This is shown in
Preferably, the control system 1 then calculates the most preferred pump flow rate derived or calculated from an ideal or theoretically “Starling-Like” response (see below) and this is depicted in
At step 7, the control system 1 may also receive additional expert data 8. This expert data 8 is generally data entered by an expert or medical professional and may generally include data such as haemocrit (herein referred to as “Hct”) levels derived from separate blood pathology testing. If the control system 1 receives this expert data 8 at step 7, the control system 1 proceeds to step 9. Step 9 allows the control system 1 to calculate flow derived by Hct, power and pump speed.
If no expert data 8 is received by the control system at step 1, the control system 1 then proceeds to step 6. During step 6, the control system 1 compares the actual pump flow with the desired pump flow and adjusts the pump speed signal, accordingly.
Step 5 allows the control system 1 to determine whether a suction event has or is about to occur and further allows the control system 1 to reduce the pumping speed signal to avert the suction event, where necessary.
Step 3 in the control system 1 allows the control system 1 to convert the pump speed signal into a commutation signal to drive the rotation of the impeller within the rotary blood pump 2.
Generally, a normal healthy heart follows the relationship depicted in the graph 24 of
Preferably, as depicted in
This may be non-invasively achieved by observing the pulsatility amplitude or PI 30 of pump speed and thereby allowing a relatively unique relationship between PI 30 and PCWP 22 to be able to be established for each patient.
Relationships for PI 30 and PCWP 22 can be established for each patient by incrementing pump speed and recording PCWP 22 using standard measurement techniques while the patient is in intensive care. A diagram demonstrating this unique relationship is shown in
PI 30 may be derived from instantaneous speed of a rotor within the rotary blood pump 2. PI 30 may therefore be used in feedback loop in the control system 1 to produce relatively normal response curves for each patient. The pressurisation of the Left Ventricle (herein referred to as “LV”) and its influence of rotor speed is shown in
PI 30 may be a general indication of the pulsatility of blood flowing through the rotary blood pump 2. Preferably, clinicians or patients may set a pumping speed of the rotary blood pomp 2 by inputting a target speed into the control system 1. This original target speed may be interpreted by the control system 1 as either a single set point or a desired operating range for pump speed (example preferred ranges 28 in
Increases in LV flow rates generally lead to increases in blood reaching or delivered to the rotary blood pump 2. As Left Ventricle Pressure 31 (‘LVP’) increases, aortic pressures may become relatively negative and the pressure differential across the rotary blood pump 2 may decrease. This decrease in pressure across the pump 2 may also lead to a reduction in flow within the pump 2. Increased fluid loads may cause the rotor in the pump 2 to slow slightly. When LVP 31 is reduced, the rotor within the pump 2 may slightly increase in rotation speed. Amendments to the actual pump speed 32 may alter the PI 30, as the effectiveness of ventricular unloading is altered. Additionally, when the aortic valve no longer opens (because of relative pressure or mechanical failure), PI 30 may be reduced.
Increasing the target speed may cause maximum LVP 31 to drop as the LV is unloaded more quickly and aortic flow decreased. The pomp speed waveform dampens (less variation in speed across the cardiac cycle) and poise pressure lowers and disappears.
With static system performance parameters increasing target speed may lead to a decrease PI 30. This situation is demonstrated in the graph shown in
Decreasing the target speed may allow the LV more time to fill and thus permits it to contract effectively and leads to improved pulsatility. With a relatively static system, performance parameters set for a decreasing target speed may lead to increase PI 30.
A relatively low PI 30 may suggest that the LV is not adequately contracting and this may be a result of the pump target speed being too high. This generally results in over-pumping blood 26 from the LV.
High PI 30 may generally indicate that there is increased pulsatility of flow through the pump. In situations where a high PI 30 is being experienced, pump target speed may need to be increased to more efficiently offload the ventricle. A high PI 30 may also occur where the pump target speed is too high relative to the amount of blood being delivered to the pump. The ventricle walls may collapse may lead to temporary increase in PI 30. These types of situations may be indicative of underpumping 27 of the LV.
Preferably, PI may be calculated by the following formula:
PI=(Maximum pump speed−Minimum pump speed)/Pulsatility scaling factor
In the first embodiment of the present invention, PI 30 is calculated by the averages of the last 5 speed samples executed at 40 millisecond intervals. The preferred array stares the last 100 averaged speed samples for comparison. Instantaneous speed values 32 may be updated at a rate dependant on the pomp speed (i.e. the speed samples may be collected every 8th transition of the pump speed signal from low to high) but where the sampling preferably occurs every 40 milliseconds. PI 30 may also be detected in respect of cardiac cycles and the preferred control system may detect PI 30 over 4 cardiac cycles (assuming average rate is 60 bpm=5 secs)
For each patient a relationship established between PI 30 and PCWP 22 initially through invasive measurement of PCWP 22. This relationship is produced between the desired CO 25 of the patient as a function of PI 30.
The most preferred rotary by pump 2 includes a relatively flat flow rate Vs pressure curve or relationship for any given pump speed, a characteristic of centrifugal pumps but particularly with those which utilise a hydrodynamic bearing in their design. This characteristic further assists in providing a “Starling-Like” response, when used in combination with the present embodiment.
In this first preferred embodiment, the actual pump speed may be used to derive PI 30 by the control system 1. The actual pump speed signal provides a relatively low noise signal for use by the control system 1 (especially when compared to the signal of the current drawn by the motor of the pump) and actual pump speed also does not include other variables within it's signal composition (the signal generated in relation to current or power used by the motor of the pump may typically include other variables such as preload values, pressures and left atrial pressures).
A person working in this area may also appreciate that the automatic calculation of LVP 31 and PI 30 by the control system 1 may be replaced with implantable sensors (not shown). These implantable sensors may detect the input data directly and feed back this data directly to the control system 1 and may be implanted in the patient. The control system 1 may then amend the target pump spend accordingly based on these detected inputs.
The control system may also provide a pulsed target speed to the rotary blood pump 2. This pulsed target speed may attempt to emulate or enhance the pulsing of the normal patient's heart The pulsing target speed allows the rotary blood pump 2 to be continuously operated to avoid thrombogenesis. The pulsing target speed generally occurs within a range of between 1250-3000 rpm. The pulsing of target speed may also be timed with the detected heart rate of the patient. Additional heart rate sensors (not shown) may directly detect the patient's heart rate in real-time and feed this information back to the control system for timing adjustment to the pulsing target speed.
The control system 1 may also include a selective mode called ‘CPR mode’ (not shown), which can be selectively activated by clinicians. CPR mode may be activated by a software interface working with the control system 1 and preferably is activated when the patient requires external CPR. The control system 1, when in CPR mode, reduces the pump target speed range to between 1250-1800 rpm. The preferred target speed of the control system 1 in CPR mode is about 1250 rpm. In CPR mode, the forward flow of blood through both the pump and aortic valve is maintained and retrograde flow back into the ventricle is avoided, provided that the external CPR generates a Mean Arterial Pressure (‘MAP’) of at least 40 mm Hg. In CPR Mode, the rotary blood pump continues to run at a minimum speed so that the risk of thrombogenesis proximal to the rotary blood pump or patient's heart is reduced or eliminated. Preferably, this minimum speed is low enough to allow the ventricle time in fill from the left atrium, but not from the aorta via the pump conduit. This should lead to resolution of the suction event and more effective contractions during periods of haemodynamic compromise.
Additionally, if the control system 1 detects the imminence of a suction event, the control system 1 may preferably automatically activate CPR mode reducing the pump speed to a default value or a set value. The effect of the activation of the CPR mode is that the target speed of the pump is quickly reduced to a minimum safe operating speed. The minimum safe operating speed achieves all of the aforementioned advantages of CPR mode.
Additionally, the control system 1 may also calculate the second derivative of instantaneous sped (not shown) of the rotary blood pump 2 and then use this calculated second derivative of speed of speed to predict the imminence of a suction event. The second derivative of instantaneous speed may show sharp angular peaks 33 as shown in
The above descriptions detail only some of the embodiments of the present invention. Modifications may be obvious to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005906123 | Nov 2005 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4296500 | Monties et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4611578 | Heimes | Sep 1986 | A |
4957504 | Chardack | Sep 1990 | A |
4969864 | Schwarzmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5220259 | Werner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5289821 | Swartz | Mar 1994 | A |
5728069 | Montevecchi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5888242 | Antaki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6027498 | Mutch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6066086 | Antaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068588 | Goldowsky | May 2000 | A |
6071093 | Hart | Jun 2000 | A |
6183412 | Benkowski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6227797 | Watterson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6277078 | Porat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6395026 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6443983 | Nagyszalanczy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6547753 | Plunkett et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572530 | Araki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595762 | Khanwilkar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610004 | Viole et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623420 | Reich et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6685621 | Bolling et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709382 | Horner | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752602 | Schulte Eistrup et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6783328 | Lucke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6949066 | Bearnson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6991595 | Burke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7138776 | Gauthier et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7141943 | Song et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7494459 | Anstadt | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7645225 | Medvedev et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8096935 | Sutton et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8246563 | Wariar | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295918 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8348923 | Kanderian, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388530 | Shusterman | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402490 | Hoffberg-Borghesani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409103 | Grunwald et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435278 | Callister et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8473041 | Bartnik et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8597193 | Grunwald et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010009645 | Noda | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020183628 | Reich et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045772 | Reich et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030092961 | Korakianitis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030199727 | Burke et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040047736 | Nose et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040152944 | Medvedev et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050208095 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215843 | Medvedev | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060149331 | Mann et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20100222632 | Poirier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222633 | Poirier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222634 | Poirier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222635 | Poirier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222878 | Poirier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120136242 | Qi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 354 606 | Oct 2003 | EP |
WO 0105023 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0172352 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03057280 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004028593 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051838 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ayre et al., “Identifying physiologically significant pumping states in implantable rotary blood pumps using non/invasive system observers”, Proc. of 25th Annual Inter. Conf. of IEEE, pp. 439/442 (2003). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,908, mailing date May 6, 2011, 12 pgs. |
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,908, mailing date Aug. 8, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140142367 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12468951 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 14162599 | US | |
Parent | 11592354 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12468951 | US |