Patent Grant
7242310
The present invention generally relates to the control of fuel-fired heating appliances and, in representatively illustrated embodiments thereof, more particularly provides improved control techniques for shut-off sensors, such as flammable vapor sensors, in fuel-fired heating appliances such as water heaters.
Over the past several years various proposals have been made for protecting fuel-fired heating appliances, such as water heaters, from flammable vapor ignition problems using sensors operable to shut down combustion in the appliance when flammable vapors, such as gasoline fumes, are detected near the appliance. Shut-off systems of this type have been proposed to terminate further combustion air flow to the appliance or to terminate further fuel flow thereto.
One design issue presented by this use of flammable vapor sensors is that the strength of their sensing output signal for a given concentration of sensed flammable vapors tends to diminish over time as the sensor “ages”. Since the typical flammable vapor sensor used in this application normally stands idle for years without ever being exposed to flammable vapors of any sort, the strength of its output signal for a given concentration of sensed flammable vapor can become significantly degraded by the time (if ever) the sensor is called upon to shut down combustion in its associated heating appliance. Since the heating appliance control system typically prevents the sensor from terminating combustion (or preventing combustion initiation) in the appliance until the strength of the flammable vapor sensor output signal reaches a predetermined magnitude, the aging degradation of the sensor output signal in effect undesirably raises the concentration of flammable vapors that the sensor must be exposed to before the sensor shuts off or prevents initiation of combustion in the appliance that it protects.
Another design issue presented by the flammable vapor sensor shut-off control of a fuel-fired water heater or other type of fuel-fired heating appliance (such as a furnace or boiler) is associated with the establishment of a “range” of detected flammable vapor concentrations in which the sensor will shut down the fuel-fired heating appliance with which it is operatively coupled.
For example, the typical flammable vapor sensor used in conjunction with a fuel-fired water heater is a chemiresistor type sensor which outputs an electrical resistance signal indicative of the resistance of the sensor which automatically varies as a function of the concentration of flammable vapors to which the sensor is being exposed to. Water heater industry standards with respect to this type of flammable vapor sensor have been established and set forth a combustion shutoff range of sensor resistance output signals extending from a minimum resistance output signal magnitude of approximately 2-3 kΩ to a maximum resistance output signal magnitude of approximately 50 kΩ. Unless the resistance signal from the flammable vapor sensor is within this standard range, the control system with which the sensor is operatively associated will not permit a sensor-based combustion shutdown of the controlled appliance.
This industry standard lower limit is designed to prevent an “override” of the sensor via a jumper or the like, while the upper limit is designed to provide a trip point to indicate the detection of flammable vapors. However, in practice it has been found that this standard flammable vapor sensor output signal magnitude range is not totally satisfactory because it does not account for the speed of response for low end resistance due to temperature, etc.
From the foregoing it can seen that it would be desirable to provide improved control techniques for shut-off sensors in fuel-fired appliances such as water heaters. It is to this goal that the present invention is primarily directed.
In carrying out principles of the present invention, in accordance with representatively illustrated embodiments thereof, improved control techniques are provided for use in conjunction with a fuel-fired heating appliance having a combustion shut-off system in which a sensor generates an age-degradable output signal indicative of its detection of an undesirable gas or other substance and usable to preclude combustion in the appliance. From a broad perspective, the accuracy of the combustion shut-off system is improved using a method comprising the steps of providing a timer operable to output a time signal indicative of the total time the sensor has been operatively associated with the appliance, and utilizing the time signal to compensate for age-created inaccuracy in the sensor output signal.
In one representative embodiment of the method, the utilizing step is performed using the steps of combining the time signal and the sensor output signal to create a time-adjusted output signal, and utilizing the time-adjusted output signal to preclude combustion in the appliance. The method preferably comprises the additional step of setting minimum and maximum signal magnitudes between which the magnitude of the time-adjusted sensor output signal must fall to preclude combustion in the appliance. Illustratively, the time-adjusted output signal is an electrical resistance signal. According to a feature of the invention, an improved signal magnitude range is provided in which the minimum signal magnitude setting is within the range of from approximately 6 kΩ to approximately 10 kΩ, and preferably about 8 kΩ, and the maximum signal magnitude setting is within the range of from approximately 90 kΩ to approximately 110 kΩ, and preferably about 100 kΩ.
In a second representative embodiment of the method, the combustion shut-off system is initially provided with the aforementioned minimum and maximum signal magnitude settings, but the time signal is not used to modify the sensor output signal. Instead, the time signal is used to modify, over time, the originally established minimum and maximum signal magnitude settings so that they “track” the age-created degradation in the sensor output signal.
The sensor preferably detects changes in concentration of an undesirable gas or other substance and outputs a variable signal in response to such detection. In preferred versions of each of the aforementioned two representative embodiments of a combustion shut-off method, in which a combustion shut-off signal magnitude range is initially established, the time signal is used to compensate for age-created changes in the sensor output signal magnitude in a manner maintaining a predetermined relationship between the concentration of the detected substance and the sensor-based preclusion of combustion within the appliance.
Illustratively, the fuel-fired appliance is a fuel-fired water heater having a fuel supply valve, the sensor is a chemiresistor type flammable vapor sensor operative to output a variable electrical resistance signal, and the combustion shut-off system is operable to close the fuel supply valve under the control of the sensor.
However, the invention is not limited to water heaters, and principles of the invention could also be utilized in conjunction with other types of fuel-fired heating appliances such as, for example, boilers and furnaces. Also, a variety of other types of sensors, such as carbon monoxide sensors, and sensors having different types of output signals, could be utilized without departing from principles of the present invention.
Schematically illustrated in
Water heater 10 is illustratively supported on a floor 14 and includes an insulated tank structure 16 in which a quantity of pressurized, heated water 18 is stored for on-demand delivery to various plumbing fixtures such as sinks, showers, tubs, dishwashers and the like through an outlet fitting 20 on the top end of the tank 16. Hot water 18 discharged from the tank 16 is replaced with pressurized cold water, from a source thereof, through an inlet fitting 22 also mounted on the top end of the tank 16.
The tank 16 overlies a combustion chamber 24 at the bottom end of the water heater. A fuel burner 26 is operatively disposed within the combustion chamber 24 beneath the open bottom end of a flue 28 that communicates with the interior of the combustion chamber 24 and extends upwardly from the top side of the combustion chamber 24 through the interior of the tank 16. Fuel gas is supplied to the burner 26 through a supply line 30 in which a normally closed gas valve 32 is installed. During firing of the burner 26, fuel supplied to the burner 26 is mixed and combusted with combustion air 34 suitably delivered to the combustion chamber 24 to form hot combustion gases 36 which are flowed upwardly through the flue 28. Combustion heat from the gases 36 is transferred to the stored water 18 through the flue 28.
With continuing reference to
The operational timer 42 is operative to output to the microprocessor 40 a time signal “t” which is indicative of the total cumulative time which has elapsed since the flammable vapor sensor 44 was installed on the water heater 10. The flammable vapor sensor 44 is suitably supported adjacent the floor 14 near the bottom end of the water heater 10 and is operative to detect flammable vapor 46 (such as, for example, fumes from spilled gasoline) at or near floor level.
Flammable vapor sensor 44 continuously outputs an electrical signal “s” which is indicative of the electrical resistance of the sensor 44. In a known manner, the magnitude of the resistance output signal “s” varies with the concentration of the flammable vapor 46 to which the sensor 44 is exposed. Specifically, the magnitude of the resistance output signal “s” increases with corresponding increases in such detected flammable vapor concentration.
As will now be described in conjunction with the schematic flow chart of
Turning now to
Also pre-programmed into the microprocessor 40 is a predetermined range smin.-smax. within which the signal “sadj.” must fall for the system 12 to cause, via the operational link 38, the flammable vapor sensor-based shut-off of the gas supply valve 32. At the next step 54 a query is made as to whether the age-adjusted resistance signal “Sadj.” is within the range smin.-smax. If the answer is “NO”, step 56 is performed to preclude the flammable vapor sensor-based shut-off of the valve 32. If the answer is “YES”, step 58 is performed to cause the flammable vapor sensor-based shutoff of the valve 32.
In this manner, a predetermined relationship between the detected concentration of the flammable vapor 46 and the sensor-based shut-off of the valve 32 is advantageously maintained despite the degradation of the sensor resistance output signal “s” over time. Specifically, this predetermined relationship is that sensor-based shut-off of the valve 32 occurs during a detected flammable vapor concentration range having minimum and maximum magnitudes corresponding to the initial sensor resistance output signal minimum and maximum magnitude settings smin. and smax.
According to another feature of the present invention, in the foregoing embodiment thereof the predetermined value of smin. is set within the range of from approximately 6 kΩ to approximately 10 kΩ, preferably at about 8 kΩ, and the predetermined value of smax. is set within the range of from approximately 90 kΩ to about 110 kΩ, preferably at about 100 kΩ. This specially designed sensitivity range provides the system 12 with improved protection against nuisance tripping, while at the same time maintaining adequate responsiveness of the system. It will be appreciated, however, that the magnitudes of smin. and smax. could be set at other levels, if desired, without departing from principles of the present invention.
The sensor-based combustion shut-off control technique of a second embodiment of the system 12 is schematically depicted in the flow chart of
After the performance of step 62, a query is made at step 64 as to whether the received sensor resistance signal “s” is within the adjusted range smin-smax. If the answer is “NO”, the process moves to step 66 which precludes sensor-based shut-off of the valve 32. If the answer is “YES”, the process moves to step 68 which causes a sensor-based shut-off of the valve 32. As in the case of the previously described
While the sensor-based combustion shutoff system 12 has been representatively described as being operative to preclude appliance combustion by shutting off fuel supply to the burner 26, it will be readily be appreciated by those of skill in this particular art that the system 12 could alternatively be utilized, if desired, to instead shut off combustion air flow to the appliance, thereby terminating or precluding combustion in the appliance, without departing from principles of the present invention. Moreover, the system 12 could of course be utilized in conjunction with a shut-off sensor whose output signal increases as the sensor ages. Additionally, while the system 12 has been illustratively described as utilizing a chemiresistor type flammable vapor sensor 44, the system 12 could alternatively utilize a variety of other types of gas sensors, if desired, without departing from principles of the present invention.
For example, and not by way of limitation, as shown in
The foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3984976 | Nagai | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4030462 | Sasayama et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4131413 | Ryno | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4364227 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4502444 | Rubbo et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4565519 | Carignan | Jan 1986 | A |
| 5120214 | West et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5255512 | Hamburg et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5359852 | Curran et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5526280 | Consadori et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5838243 | Gallo | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6025788 | Diduck | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6282888 | Sealy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6356199 | Niziolek et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6390028 | Langmead et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6412447 | Trant et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6626133 | Schell et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6662757 | Lesage | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 20040200722 | Starling et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204920 | Zimmermann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060244618 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
