1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a control unit for setting a device for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle and a device for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle and a method for setting a device for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle.
2. Description of Related Art
It is known from Wittemann W (2005), Adaptive Frontal Structure Design to achieve Optimal Deceleration Pulses, 19th International Technical Conference an the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington D.C., USA, Paper No. 05-0243, that for crash compatibility it is necessary to provide a more rigid structure in the case of a severe accident opposing party and a more yielding structure in the case of a lighter accident opposing party. Friction is regarded as being the best energy absorption method. A regulation for the rigidity may be provided before and during the crash.
A crash box is known from European patent application document EP 1 792 786 A2, which has a housing-type deformation profile having a flange plate at the long channel bar end of the chassis frame, and is developed as a folded construction of sheet metal. The deformation profile is made up of two shell components, a flange plate section being attached to each shell component. The shell components are folded from initial mounting plates made of sheet metal, that are subsequently assembled and joined together using resistance welding points. This represents a usual crash box without any adaptation to a crash process. However, such an adaptation is known from published German patent application document DE 197 45 656 A1, for example. In that instance, a crash damper for a vehicle is proposed, a deformation being able to be controlled as a function of a precrash signal, that is, a signal of an all-around view sensor system such as on a radar sensor system or a crash signal. On a deformation element, it is proposed that sliders move perpendicular to the direction of force and thereby block the deformation elements, so that because of the force effect, these deformation elements reduce the crash energy by the plastic deformation based on the blocking. An adaptation to the crash process is possible because of a parallel arrangement or by an interconstruction of such deformation elements. As a further example, it is proposed to use a deformation element for the reduction of crash energy by tapering. In this instance, an element is fixed for tapering and an additional one is able to be released by a slider so as to reduce the tapering. The motion of the slider takes place in radial fashion, in this instance, i.e. perpendicular to the direction of force, and thus to the longitudinal axis of the deformation element, usually a cylinder having a specified wall thickness.
By contrast, the control unit for setting a device for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle, and the device according to the present invention for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle, and the method according to the present invention for setting a device for the adaptive reduction of crash energy for a vehicle have the advantage that a regulation takes place of the deformation behavior to at least one passenger parameter, which changes as a function of the crash process. With that, the biomechanical stress of the vehicle's passengers during a crash may be optimized. And with that, the consequences of the accident may then be reduced.
A control unit, in this instance, is an electrical unit which processes the signals provided and outputs control signals as a function thereof. Such a control unit may be enclosed by a housing or sheeting. The control unit has either its own sensors, such as for measuring the acceleration or the deceleration during a crash and/or or is connected to sensors situated outside the control unit which are situated at the front of the vehicle and/or at the side of the vehicle or in a sensor control unit.
The device has the mechanical parts provided for the reduction in the crash energy. As may be inferred from the dependent claims, it is possible that the device itself includes the control unit. However, the control unit may also, for instance, be a control unit for controlling personal protective means, that is, it controls air bags, seat belt tensioners, etc. Additional configurations of the control unit are also possible.
Adaptive reduction in the crash energy means that the energy, created by the impact, is adapted to the crash process, and in the present case is reduced by the deformation of parts that are provided. This reduced energy can no longer act upon the vehicle's passengers. Therefore, the adaptation takes place as a function of sensor signals measured during the crash process or before the crash process, such as signals from a precrash sensor system and/or a crash sensor system. The precrash sensor system may be radar, video, ultrasound or other technologies, while an impact sensor system is usually at least an acceleration sensor system, but may also be a structure-borne noise sensor system, a deformation sensor system and also an air pressure sensor system, for example, that is situated in the side parts of the vehicle.
The vehicle is usually a motor vehicle, for instance, a passenger car.
The interfaces, in the present case, are either hardware and/or software interfaces. The hardware interfaces may, for instance, be situated on user-specific integrated circuits and/or an integration may take place via software interfaces, in a microcontroller, for example.
The first signal is defined as characterizing an imminent or beginning crash. It follows from this that the first signal has either data from so-called precrash sensor systems, such as an all-around view sensor systems, such as video, radar, lidar, ultrasound, etc., or during a beginning crash, from a crash sensor system such as an acceleration sensor system of a structure-borne noise sensor system or an air pressure sensor system, etc. The first signal may represent the raw data coming from the sensor system, may represent preprocessed data or already a triggering decision, a triggering time, a crash severity or similar results of an algorithm which, for instance, is processing a sensor signal for generating the first signal.
The concept of “crash process” denotes the crash from its beginning to the end. The beginning may be characterized, for example, by the exceeding of a noise threshold by the acceleration signal at 3 to 6 g (=gravitational acceleration), or by an estimate from a radar signal, in order to determine the point in time of impact or by a reverse calculation of the point in time of impact from the curve of the acceleration signal or another impact signal.
By calculating element one may understand a processor, an integrated circuit, a discrete circuit or even a software module, that will execute the calculating operations required according to the teaching of the claims. Preferably one may understand this to be a microcontroller. This computing element evaluates the first signal, for instance, a precrash sensor signal, and as a function of this, it generates a first control signal for setting the deformation behavior of at least one deformation element of the device for the adaptive reduction of the crash energy.
The precrash sensor signal should be constituted in such a way that, after suitable evaluation, it supplies data on the impending crash. These data may include speeds, angles of approach, the degree of vehicle overlapping, the point of impact of the vehicles and the mass or rigidity of the vehicles participating in the accident. From these data, an estimated crash scenario is ascertained.
Accordingly, the control signal tells how the crash scenario is looking. For this purpose, the device usually has an evaluation which is able to interpret this control signal. After that, the setting of the deformation behavior takes place, for instance, or in particular, the rigidity. The deformation behavior is adapted before or during the impact on the crash scenario, by setting the deformation element. This deformation element deforms plastically, so that by this plastic deformation the reduction of the crash energy comes about. The more rigid the deformation element, the more is the amount by which the crash energy can be reduced.
According to the present invention, the second signal is defined with the aim of characterizing at least one passenger parameter that changes as a function of the crash process. This passenger parameter may be, for instance, the forward displacement, the speed, the acceleration of the passengers. This may be estimated from the estimated or measured acceleration signal itself, for example. At this point, a suitable passenger model in simplified form may be stored, which reaches a value of the forward displacement of the passengers as a function of the measured vehicle deceleration, for instance, by a polynomial function. It is also possible, however, to detect this by using a passenger sensor system. The passenger sensor system can perform its measurement via a camera or using a force-measuring bolt in the seating, via a seat mat, ultrasound, radar or other known methods from the related art. Parameters which do not change as a function of the crash process are not pertinent to this, such as, for example, the weight of the vehicle passengers. The second control signal is generated as a function of this second signal. This takes place during the crash process, in order to change the crash behavior during the crash process, which brings about the abovementioned advantage. The second control signal is developed similarly to the first control signal.
The at least one deformation element is a structure of metal, for instance, or plastic, material composits or other materials which are tapered in order to reduce crash energy by this plastic deformation. But a deformation element that is pressed together and thereby is plastically deformed is also suitable in the case at hand.
It is of advantage that the computing element determines a passenger forward displacement with the aid of the second signal, and from this determines a restraint action of at least one personal protective means, the second control signal stating a reduction in rigidity with respect to the deformation behavior. In this instance, the passenger forward displacement is the path that the passenger covers as a result of the crash process, from his initial position at the beginning of the crash process. Thus, the restraint action is the force that an air bag or seat belt tensioner exerts on the passenger to restrain him. The present invention recognized that when the vehicle passenger feels the restraint action, he is being protected by this restraint action. Even at the beginning of the crash process, if the vehicle passenger moves freely towards the steering wheel, in the case of the driver, a high rigidity may be specified by the device according to the present invention, since no biomechanical effects on the vehicle passenger are to be expected. However, if a biomechanical effect is to be expected, such as during an impact of the vehicle passenger on the air bag, in this phase, in which the impact is to be expected, the rigidity is reduced, so as, in that way, to reduce the biomechanical effects on the vehicle passenger. Besides the air bags, seat belt tensioners, crash-active head rests, etc. should be regarded as such personal protective means.
It is furthermore advantageous that the at least one second control signal influences the deformation behavior with respect to the rigidity, in such a way that a path of the passenger, as a result of the crash, from its position at the beginning of the crash process to the beginning of the restraint effect is maximally utilized by at least one personal protective means, in order to reduce stress on the passenger. This describes once more functionally that during the so-called free flight of the passengers, a great reduction in the crash energy is able to take place, and also during the dipping of the vehicle passenger into the air bag, but not during the impact on the air bag. The maximum utilization originates with the fact that during the path the vehicle passenger covers from his initial position until his impinging on his airbag is used for reducing the crash energy.
It is further advantageous that the computing element determines a crash severity with the aid of the second signal, and with the aid of the crash severity it generates the at least one second control signal. The speed at which the vehicle passenger covers the distance from his initial position to the unfolded air bag, is a measure for the crash severity. For this, a Taylor Series may be developed as a function of the acceleration signal or a signal derived from it. By crash severity, a measure is understood to mean how great are the results for the vehicle passenger.
It is of advantage that the control unit is installed in the device. That being the case, a self-sufficient device may be installed, particularly if it is also equipped with the appropriate sensor system. Alternatively, it is possible for the device also to have an interface to which the control unit or other control units may additionally be connected.
As was indicated above, the device advantageously has a first deformation element which becomes tapered so as to deform plastically, and thereby to reduce the crash energy, an actuating system being also provided for setting this tapering as a function of the first and/or the second control signal. This actuating system may, for instance, function inductively, using motors or other methods, which are in a position to hold the so-called die plates which are used for the tapering, so that these die plates are not pressed away to the side by the deformation element.
The device advantageously has still a second deformation element which is compressed as a result of the deformation, support elements being provided which the second deformation element releases for deformation as a result of the first and/or the second control signal. A combination of the first and the second deformation element in the same device is of particular advantage, in this context, since thereby certain force levels may be determined in a different manner.
Sensor system 2.3, which supplies the first and the second signal, these two also being able to be identical, and differing only in their time curve, i.e. the first signal takes place earlier than the second signal, may be a crash sensor system, an acceleration sensor system, a precrash sensor system, such as a radar sensor system, etc., and/or even a sensor system for recording the at least one passenger parameter, such as a video sensor system. Control unit 2.4 processes the first and the second signal in the manner according to the present invention, in order to generate the first and the second control signal. The first control signal goes to unit 2.1, in this instance, which leads to a setting of the deformation behavior. In this context, for example, an appropriate tapering of the deformation element can be set. The second control signal goes to device 2.2, for setting the deformation during the crash process. This may then take place via a second deformation element, so that different deformation characteristics are able to be set. The second control signal is also able to influence the degree of tapering, for example, in that a tapering stage is taken back and instead, the deformation is influenced by mechanism 2.2, by now deforming a deformation element that is pressed together or compressed. Via line 2.5, a data traffic is carried out by control unit 2.4 with other control units, in order to supply to these control units the sensor data and the corresponding evaluations.
In a block diagram,
At this point, a high level of deceleration is required. Systems of restraint are set in a force-limiting manner in such a way that deceleration peaks and a comparatively high deceleration level leads to an optimal biomechanical stress.
In step 603, the second signal is then provided, which characterizes at least one passenger parameter that changes as a function of the crash process. In succeeding step 604, a second control signal is generated as a function of the second signal for setting the deformation behavior during the crash process in step 605.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102009046984.2 | Nov 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/067913 | 11/22/2010 | WO | 00 | 8/3/2012 |