The present invention relates to a control unit for yarn-braking devices in weft feeders for looms, in particular rapier looms, projectile looms and air-jet looms, and to a tuning method therefor.
As it is known, weft feeders for textile machines comprise a stationary drum on which a plurality of yarn loops forming a weft reserve are wound. Upon request from the loom, the loops are unwound from the drum, then pass through a braking device which controls the tension of the yarn, and finally feed the loom.
In the weft feeders of the above kind, which are known from prior art documents in the name of the present Applicant, such as EP 1 059 375, the braking device typically comprises a frustoconical hollow member which is supported at the centre of an annular support on a spider assembly of springs, and is biased with its inner surface against the end of the drum from which the loops are unwound. A pair of linear actuators operatively connected to the annular support are driven by a control unit having a position control loop and a current control loop, which is capable of generating a modulated current as a function of the fluctuations of the yarn tension, in order to modulate the pressure applied upon the drum by the cone. This assembly is supported on a slide that is longitudinally movable under control of a worm screw mechanism that is manually operable in order to adjust the static pressure, or preload, applied upon the drum by the cone at rest. Therefore, the unwinding yarn runs between the drum and the frustoconical member, which modulately applies the desired braking action upon the yarn.
Although the above control unit allows the braking action to be modulated smoothly and dynamically, however it has the drawback that its accuracy considerably decreases when certain parameters are changed, such as the stiffness of the springs which support the frustoconical member, or the static pressure applied upon the drum by the cone, which parameters are chosen, e.g., on the basis of the type of yarn under processing, the loom speed, the loom height, and the like. In fact, as well known to the person skilled in the art, the position control loop is designed to operate accurately with a specific set of springs and with a predetermined value of preload. On the contrary, changing these parameters results in an error of compensation. The more said parameters differ from the design parameters, the more relevant said error.
Therefore, it is a main object of the present invention to provide a control unit for yarn-braking devices in weft feeders for looms, which can be tuned in an automatized way on the basis of variable parameters concerning the yarn-braking device, in particular, the stiffness of the springs and the static pressure, as well as to provide a setting or tuning method for the control unit, which can be easily automatized and requires a short execution time.
The above object and other advantages, which will better appear below, are achieved by a control unit having the features recited in claim 1, while the other claims state other advantageous, though secondary, features of the invention.
The invention will be now described in more detail with reference to a few preferred, non-exclusive embodiments, shown by way of non limiting example in the attached drawings, wherein:
With reference to the above Figures, a weft feeder 10 for textile machines comprises a stationary drum 12 provided with a beveled delivery edge 12a, on which a swivel arm 14 driven by a motor 15 winds a plurality of yarn loops forming a weft reserve RT.
A stationary arm 17 parallel to the axis of the drum projects from the motor housing and supports a yarn-braking device 18 having the task of controlling the tension of the yarn unwinding from the drum.
The yarn-braking device 18 comprises a frame 20 supported on a slide 22 that is movable along the stationary arm 17 under control of a worm screw mechanism (not shown) that is operable by a knob 24. In a known way, frame 20 supports a pair of electromechanical, linear actuators 26, 28 (
Having now reference to
The braking assembly according to this invention is representable by means of an equivalent mass-spring system, with an equivalent mass corresponding to the mass of the parts in motion, i.e., rods 26a, 28a, magnets 40, annular support 30 and springs 34, and an elastic constant k which takes into account both the stiffness of the springs forming the spider assembly, and the elastic yielding of the frustoconical member. Position compensator 48 also includes a transfer function which changes as a function of elastic constant k, and is connected for receiving variable values of said elastic constant k which are calculated by executing a preliminary tuning procedure in control unit 44.
As shown in
where m is the mass of the parts in motion, h is the viscous friction coefficient of the system, k is the elastic constant, and s is the complex pulsation, in order to obtain a corresponding displacement X.
In a first embodiment of the invention, the tuning method comprises the steps of: a) positioning the rod of the actuator at a first measuring position between the opposed stop positions X1-X2, preferably a measuring position X3 corresponding to a half of the rod stroke, with the actuator controlled by means of an accessory, slow position control loop with a narrow passband, e.g., a passband of 1 Hz,
b) overlaying a broad-band, variable current signal, preferably a periodical, symmetrical current signal (e.g., a rectangular signal), to the current i3 required for maintaining the rod at the measuring position X3, whereby the load is excited above its mechanical resonance frequency,
c) calculating the coefficients a0, a1, a2 of the numerical transfer function
which connects the current across the actuator to the position of the rod, by means of calculation methods well known to the person skilled in the art, such as batch identification methods (e.g., minimum squares), or recursive methods (e.g., recursive minimum squares),
d) calculating the static gain, i.e., with z=1, of the numerical transfer function that connects the current across the actuator to the position of the rod, i.e.,
e) calculating the resonance frequency fris of the numerical transfer function by means of numerical methods well known to the person skilled in the art, such as Fourier transform methods, for example by discrete values,
f) calculating the value of the elastic constant k of the equivalent system by inserting the value of the measured resonance frequency into the numerical transfer function, according to the formula s=j2□f, whereby, under conditions of low viscous friction (h=0),
k=m*(2πfris)2,
g) calculating the value of the force constant kf by multiplying the transfer function in condition of direct current f.d.t.(z=1) by the calculated elastic constant k, i.e.:
kf=k/(a0+a1+a2)
h) compensating the position control loop of each actuator with the calculated parameters which relate thereto.
The above method allows both the equivalent elastic constant k and the force constant kf of the actuators to be determined.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, in which the force constant kf of the actuators is assumed to be known, the tuning method comprises the steps of:
a) positioning the rod of the actuator at a first measuring position X1 very close to the innermost stop position in which the brake is at rest and the braking member applies the lowermost pressure upon the drum,
b) measuring the current i1 required for maintaining the rod at the first measuring position X1, across each actuator,
c) positioning the rod of the actuator at a second measuring position X2 very close to the outermost stop position in which the braking member applies the highermost pressure upon the drum,
d) measuring the current i2 required for maintaining the rod at the second measuring position X2, across each actuator,
e) calculating the forces F1, F2 exerted by the linear actuator at the measuring positions X1, X2 respectively, by multiplying the force constant kf of the actuators by the measured current values i1, i2 respectively,
f) calculating the elastic constant of the equivalent system k by dividing the difference between the forces exerted by the linear actuator at the measuring positions X1, X2 by the difference between the measuring positions X1, X2, i.e.:
g) similarly to the previous embodiment, compensating the position control loop of each actuator with the calculated parameters which relate thereto.
Therefore, the above procedure allows both the equivalent elastic constant k and the preload force F1 to be calculated. The equivalent elastic constant is the angular coefficient of the line of
Advantageously, as shown in
which relation derives from simple algebrical calculations deriving from the line of FIG. 5. This allows the differences between different actuators to be automatically compensated, so that the same desired braking action will be virtually obtained.
Of course, the above-described tuning methods are particularly suited to be automatized by means of computer-assisted processing techniques, which are intended to be known to the person skilled in the art, e.g., by incorporating their procedures in the feeder-starting routine so that, when the feeder is started, the control unit is automatically set to the parameters of stiffness and preload of the system. The measured values of elastic constant k, force constant kf, and preload F1, may also be visualized, e.g., on a monitor accessible to the operator, in a conventional way, in order to supply the operator with informations useful for manually tuning the system.
A few preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, but of course many changes may be made by the person skilled in the art within the scope of the appended claims.
The disclosures in Italian Patent Application No. T02005A000484 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2005A0484 | Jul 2005 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5425399 | Shindo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
6095449 | Gallo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6269844 | Zenoni et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328081 | Gotti et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6418976 | Loehr et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6752177 | Zenoni et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20050203659 | Siegl | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1314806 | May 2003 | EP |
1405941 | Apr 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070028989 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |