This application relates to a system for identifying an actual position of a rotary device.
Modern systems include any number of components which are driven by rotary motors. Many of these systems require precise positioning.
Thus, it is known to develop position monitoring systems. As one example, in a brushless DC motor, it is known to provide sensors which sense rotation of the permanent magnets on a motor rotor. The motor rotor drives a shaft which, in turn, drives a component to a desired rotary position. In at least som e systems, there is a gear speed change arrangement between a first shaft driven by the motor rotor and a second shaft which drives the component.
In practice, there is the potential for a difference between a sensed position, based upon the rotation of the motor rotor, and an actual position of the component. This can occur due to backlash within the gears due to torsional spring features. In addition, the shafts have a spring like response to the torque from the motor to the component.
There are also numerous other realities within an electromechanical system which can result in the sensed position being different from an actual position. All of these issues can result in the actual component position being different from a desired component position.
Of course, this could be undesirable.
An electromechanical system has a component to be positioned, a rotary permanent magnet motor for positioning the component, and sensors for determining an apparent position of the component based upon rotation of the permanent magnets. A control counts movement of the permanent magnets that pass the sensors in a desired direction and also in an undesired direction. The control reaches an actual position of the component based upon both directions of rotation. The control also compares the actual position to an expected position of the component and identifies a need to calibrate should a difference between the actual and expected positions differ by more than a determined amount.
A method is also disclosed.
These and other features may be best understood from the following drawings and specification.
System 20 includes a brushless DC motor 24 having a stator 26 and a rotor 28. As known, the rotor 28 includes a plurality of permanent magnets. Sensors, which may be Hall effect sensors 30 sense the passage of each of the magnets to calculate rotation of the rotor 28. Signal pulses 46 from sensors 30 are sent to a control 40, which calculates an apparent position of an output of the brushless DC motor 24.
The rotor 28 drives a first shaft 32, which in this embodiment, drives a gear 34. Gear 34 engages and drives a gear 36 to provide a speed change between the input shaft 32 and an output shaft 38. Output shaft 38 drives the rotational position of a component 42, which may be a valve.
In one embodiment, the valve controls supply of a coolant 43 to an outlet 45 for use of the coolant on a space craft 22.
The control 40 is driving the motor stator 26 to position the valve 42 at a desired position. While a valve 42 is disclosed, other components may come within the scope of this disclosure.
As can be appreciated, it may be desirable that the position of the valve 42 be known precisely to a control 40.
Thus, it is known to take feedback of the rotation and utilize that feedback to identify an apparent position of the component 42.
However, for the reasons set forth in the background of the invention, this feedback does not always provide an accurate indication of the actual position. As an example, when the motor 28 stops, the forces in The electromechanical system can result in undesired reverse rotation.
A flowchart shown in
Sensors send pulses 46, as shown in
As shown in
As mentioned above, there are a number of spring forces within the system 20 of
Of course, the terms “add” and “subtract” would be dependent upon the desired direction. In some operations, rotation may be desired in say a counterclockwise direction such that the opposed movement would be clockwise. In other operations, it might be that the desired movement is clockwise, such that the “unwinding” would be counterclockwise. At any rate, the steps 56 and 60 result in an accurate understanding of what should be the actual position of the component 42 to a more accurate degree than has been the case in the past.
As shown in
The value X may be selected to ensure there is not too much difference between actual and expected positions of the valve.
It should be understood that the differences between the expected and actual position can build up over time and such a calibration step would remove that buildup, such that the actual position would become closer to the expected position.
Although an embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.