This invention generally relates to controllable coupling or clutch assemblies and, in particular, to such assemblies which have forward and reverse backlash.
Coupling assemblies such as clutches are used in a wide variety of applications to selectively couple power from a first rotatable driving member, such as a driving disk or plate, to a second, independently rotatable driven member, such as a driven disk or plate. In one known variety of clutches, commonly referred to as “one-way” or “overrunning” clutches, the clutch engages to mechanically couple the driving member to the driven member only when the driving member rotates in a first direction relative to the driven member. Further, the clutch otherwise permits the driving member to freely rotate in the second direction relative to the driven member. Such “freewheeling” of the driving member in the second direction relative to the driven member is also known as the “overrunning” condition.
One type of one-way clutch includes coaxial driving and driven plates having generally planar clutch faces in closely spaced, juxtaposed relationship. A plurality of recesses or pockets is formed in the face of the driving plate at angularly spaced locations about the axis, and a strut or pawl is disposed in each of the pockets. Multiple recesses or notches are formed in the face of the driven plate and are engageable with one or more of the struts when the driving plate is rotating in a first direction. When the driving plate rotates in a second direction opposite the first direction, the struts disengage the notches, thereby allowing freewheeling motion of the driving plate with respect to the driven plate.
When the driving plate reverses direction from the second direction to the first direction, the driving plate typically rotates relative to the driven plate until the clutch engages. As the amount of relative rotation increases, the potential for an engagement noise also increases.
Controllable or selectable one-way clutches (i.e., OWCs) are a departure from traditional one-way clutch designs. Selectable OWCs add a second set of locking members in combination with a slide plate. The additional set of locking members plus the slide plate adds multiple functions to the OWC. Depending on the needs of the design, controllable OWCs are capable of producing a mechanical connection between rotating or stationary shafts in one or both directions. Also, depending on the design, OWCs are capable of overrunning in one or both directions. A controllable OWC contains an extremely controlled selection or control mechanism. Movement of this selection mechanism can be between two or more positions which correspond to different operating modes.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,455 discloses a bi-directional overrunning pawl-type clutch, U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,965 discloses a planar overrunning coupling, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,044 discloses a selectable one-way clutch assembly for use in an automatic transmission. U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,258,214 and 7,344,010 disclose overrunning coupling assemblies, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,484,605 discloses an overrunning radial coupling assembly or clutch.
A properly designed controllable OWC can have near-zero parasitic losses in the “off” state. It can also be activated by electro-mechanics and does not have either the complexity or parasitic losses of a hydraulic pump and valves.
In a powershift transmission, tip-in clunk is one of most difficult challenges due to absence of a torque converter. When the driver tips-in, i.e., depresses the accelerator pedal following a coast condition, gear shift harshness and noise, called clunk, are heard and felt in the passenger compartment due to the mechanical linkage, without a fluid coupling, between the engine and powershift transmission input. Tip-in clunk is especially acute in a parking-lot maneuver, in which a vehicle coasting at low speed is then accelerated in order to maneuver into a parking space.
In order to achieve good shift quality and to eliminate tip-in clunk, a powershift transmission should employ a control strategy that is different from that of a conventional automatic transmission. The control system should address the unique operating characteristics of a powershift transmission and include remedial steps to avoid the objectionable harshness yet not interfere with driver expectations and performance requirements of the powershift transmission. There is a need to eliminate shift harshness and noise associated with tip-in clunk in a powershift transmission.
For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupling” should be interpreted to include clutches or brakes wherein one of the plates is drivably connected to a torque delivery element of a transmission and the other plate is drivably connected to another torque delivery element or is anchored and held stationary with respect to a transmission housing. The terms “coupling”, “clutch” and “brake” may be used interchangeably.
A pocket plate may be provided with angularly disposed recesses or pockets about the axis of the one-way clutch. The pockets are formed in the planar surface of the pocket plate. Each pocket receives a torque transmitting strut, one end of which engages an anchor point in a pocket of the pocket plate. An opposite edge of the strut, which may hereafter be referred to as an active edge, is movable from a position within the pocket to a position in which the active edge extends outwardly from the planar surface of the pocket plate. The struts may be biased away from the pocket plate by individual springs.
A notch plate may be formed with a plurality of recesses or notches located approximately on the radius of the pockets of the pocket plate. The notches are formed in the planar surface of the notch plate.
Another example of an overrunning planar clutch is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,057.
Some U.S. patents related to the present invention include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,056,747; 5,052,534; 5,070,978; 5,449,057; 5,486,758; 5,678,668; 5,806,643; 5,871,071; 5,918,715; 5,964,331; 5,979,627; 6,065,576; 6,116,394; 6,125,980; 6,129,190; 6,186,299; 6,193,038; 6,386,349; 6,481,551; 6,505,721; 6,571,926; 6,814,201; 7,153,228; 7,275,628; 8,051,959; 8,196,724; and 8,286,772.
Yet still other related U.S. patents include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,200,002; 5,954,174; and 7,025,188.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,577 discloses a sound-dampened, one-way clutch including a plastic/steel pair of struts to dampen engagement clunk. The plastic strut is slightly longer than the steel strut. This pattern can be doubled to dual engaging. This approach has had some success. However, the dampening function stopped when the plastic parts became exposed to hot oil over a period of time.
Metal injection molding (MIM) is a metalworking process where finely-powdered metal is mixed with a measured amount of binder material to comprise a ‘feedstock’ capable of being handled by plastic processing equipment through a process known as injection mold forming. The molding process allows complex parts to be shaped in a single operation and in high volume. End products are commonly component items used in various industries and applications. The nature of MIM feedstock flow is defined by a science called rheology. Current equipment capability requires processing to stay limited to products that can be molded using typical volumes of 100 grams or less per “shot” into the mold. Rheology does allow this “shot” to be distributed into multiple cavities, thus becoming cost-effective for small, intricate, high-volume products which would otherwise be quite expensive to produce by alternate or classic methods. The variety of metals capable of implementation within MIM feedstock are referred to as powder metallurgy, and these contain the same alloying constituents found in industry standards for common and exotic metal applications. Subsequent conditioning operations are performed on the molded shape, where the binder material is removed and the metal particles are coalesced into the desired state for the metal alloy.
Other U.S. patent documents related to at least one aspect of the present invention includes U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,813,929; 8,491,440; 8,491,439; 8,286,772; 8,272,488; 8,187,141; 8,079,453; 8,007,396; 7,942,781; 7,690,492; 7,661,518; 7,455,157; 7,455,156; 7,451,862; 7,448,481, 7,383,930; 7,223,198; 7,100,756; and 6,290,044; and U.S. published application Nos. 2015/0000442; 2014/0305761; 2013/0277164; 2013/0062151; 2012/0152683; 2012/0149518; 2012/0152687; 2012/0145505; 2011/0233026; 2010/0105515; 2010/0230226; 2009/0233755; 2009/0062058; 2009/0211863; 2008/0110715; 2008/0188338; 2008/0185253; 2006/0124425; 2006/0249345; 2006/0185957; 2006/0021838; 2004/0216975; and 2005/0279602.
Some other U.S. patent documents related to at least one aspect of the present invention includes U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,720,659; 8,418,825; 5,996,758; 4,050,560; 8,061,496; 8,196,724; and U.S. published application Nos. 2014/0190785; 2014/0102844; 2014/0284167; 2012/0021862; 2012/0228076; 2004/0159517; and 2010/0127693.
A problem has arisen with some controllable one-way clutches (i.e. mechanical diodes (MD's)) which are meant to lock in one direction and lock or free wheel in the opposite direction, depending upon the position of a selector. In certain positions or locations, the clutch may not come out of a “lock-lock” condition (i.e. may inadvertently bind in both directions about the axis).
An object of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to provide a controllable coupling assembly having forward and reverse backlash and which is prevented from inadvertently binding.
In carrying out the above object and other objects of at least one embodiment of the present invention, a controllable coupling assembly having forward and reverse backlash is provided. The assembly includes a plurality of forward locking elements. Each of the forward locking elements has a load-bearing surface. The assembly also includes at least one reverse locking element and first and second coupling members supported for relative rotation about a common rotational axis. The coupling members include a first coupling face having a set of forward pockets angularly spaced about the axis. Each of the forward pockets receives one of the forward locking elements and defines a forward load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with the load-bearing surface of its respective forward locking element. The members also include a second coupling face which has a set of reverse locking formations adapted for abutting engagement with the at least one reverse locking element to prevent the relative rotation in a reverse direction about the axis and a third coupling face that opposes the first coupling face. The third coupling face has a set of forward locking formations. Each of the set of forward locking formations is adapted for abutting engagement with one of the forward locking elements to prevent the relative rotation in a forward direction about the axis. The number of forward locking elements is different than the number of reverse locking elements. The number of forward locking formations is different than the number of reverse locking formations. Either the forward backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the reverse backlash or the reverse backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the forward backlash to prevent the coupling assembly from inadvertently binding in both directions about the axis.
The assembly may further include a fourth coupling face that opposes the second coupling face. The fourth coupling face may have at least one reverse pocket. Each reverse pocket may receive a reverse locking element and may define a reverse load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with a load-bearing surface of its respective reverse locking element.
The forward pockets may be grouped into at least one set wherein the forward pockets in each set are uniformly angularly spaced.
The forward pockets may be grouped into two or more sets.
The first coupling member may have the first and second coupling faces and the second coupling member may have the third coupling face.
The first coupling face may be oriented to face axially in a first direction along the axis, wherein the second coupling face may be oriented to face axially in a second direction opposite the first direction along the axis.
The forward and reverse locking elements may be locking struts.
The forward and reverse locking formation may be notches.
The first coupling member may be a splined ring.
The first and third coupling faces may be annular coupling faces that oppose each other.
The assembly may further include a plurality of reverse locking elements and a third coupling member having a fourth coupling face that opposes the second coupling face. The fourth coupling face may have a set of reverse pockets angularly spaced about the axis. Each of the reverse pockets may receive one of the reverse locking elements and defines a reverse load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with a load-bearing surface of its respective reverse locking element.
The reverse pockets may be grouped into at least one set wherein the reverse pockets in each set are uniformly angularly spaced.
The reverse pockets may be grouped into two or more sets.
The assembly may further include a control member mounted for controlled, shifting movement between the second and fourth coupling faces relative to the set of reverse pockets and operable for controlling position of the reverse locking elements. The control member allows at least one of the reverse locking elements to engage at least one of the reverse locking formations in a first position of the control member wherein the control member maintains the reverse locking elements in their pockets in a second position of the control member.
The control member may comprise a slide plate controllably rotatable about the rotational axis between the first and second positions.
The assembly may further include a control element coupled to the control member to controllably shift the control member.
The assembly may further include a generally round snap ring that is received by an annular groove in the third coupling member to retain the members together and prevent axial movement of the members relative to one another.
Further in carrying out the above object and other objects of at least one embodiment of the present invention, a controllable clutch assembly having forward and reverse backlash is provided. The assembly includes a plurality of forward locking elements. Each of the forward locking elements has a load-bearing surface. The assembly also includes at least one reverse locking element and first and second clutch members supported for relative rotation about a common rotational axis. The clutch members include a first coupling face having a set of forward pockets angularly spaced about the axis. Each of the forward pockets receives one of the forward locking elements and defines a forward load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with the load-bearing surface of its respective forward locking element. The members also include a second coupling face which has a set of reverse locking formations adapted for abutting engagement with the at least one reverse locking element to prevent the relative rotation in a reverse direction about the axis and a third coupling face that opposes the first coupling face. The third coupling face has a set of forward locking formations. Each of the set of forward locking formations is adapted for abutting engagement with one of the forward locking elements to prevent the relative rotation in a forward direction about the axis. The number of forward locking formations is different than the number of reverse locking formations. Either the forward backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the reverse backlash or the reverse backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the forward backlash to prevent the coupling assembly from inadvertently binding in both directions about the axis. The forward pockets are grouped into at least one set wherein the forward pockets in each set are uniformly angularly spaced.
The forward pockets may be grouped into two or more sets.
Yet still further in carrying out the above object and other objects of at least one embodiment of the present invention, a controllable coupling assembly having forward and reverse backlash is provided. The assembly includes a plurality of forward locking elements. Each of the forward locking elements has a load-bearing surface. The assembly also includes a plurality of reverse locking elements. Each of the reverse locking elements has a load-bearing surface. The assembly further includes first, second and third coupling members supported for relative rotation about a common rotational axis. The coupling members have a first coupling face with a set of forward pockets angularly spaced about the axis. Each of the forward pockets receives one of the forward locking elements and defines a forward load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with the load-bearing surface of its respective forward locking element. The members also have a second coupling face with a set of reverse locking formations. Each of the set of reverse locking formations are adapted for abutting engagement with one of the reverse locking elements to prevent the relative rotation in a reverse direction about the axis. A third coupling face opposes the first coupling surface. The third coupling face has a set of forward locking formations. Each of the set of forward locking formations is adapted for abutting engagement with one of the forward locking elements to prevent the relative rotation in a forward direction about the axis. A fourth coupling face opposes the second coupling face. The fourth coupling face has a set of reverse pockets angularly spaced about the axis. Each of the reverse pockets receives one of the reverse locking elements and defines a reverse load-bearing surface adapted for abutting engagement with a load-bearing surface of its respective reverse locking element. The number of forward locking elements is different than the number of reverse locking elements. The number of forward locking formations is different than the number of reverse locking formations. Either the forward backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the reverse backlash or the reverse backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the forward backlash to prevent the coupling assembly from inadvertently binding in both directions about the axis.
The reverse pockets may be grouped into at least one set wherein the reverse pockets in each set are uniformly angularly spaced.
The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and in view of the prior art.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Referring now to the drawing figures,
The assembly 10 also includes a control member or selector slide plate, generally indicated at 26, having a plurality of spaced apertures 28 extending completely therethrough to allow the reverse struts 22 to pivot in their pockets 20 and extend through the apertures 28 to engage spaced locking formations or ramped reverse notches 30 formed in a radially extending surface or coupling face 32 (
The fork 38 is secured or coupled to the control plate 26 so that movement of the fork 38 in the slot between different angular positions causes the plate 26 to slide or shift between its control positions to alternately cover or uncover the struts 22 (i.e., to engage or disengage the reverse struts 22, respectively).
The plate 34 preferably comprises a splined ring having internal splines 46 formed at its inner axially extending surfaces 48 (
Referring collectively to
The notch plate 58 includes external splines 64 which are formed on an outer axial surface 66 of the plate 58 and which are received and retained within axially extending recesses 68 formed within an inner axially extending surface 70 of the end wall 42 of the plate 12 (
As shown in
The shift fork 38, in one control position of its control positions, disengages the reverse struts 22. The shift fork 38 is rotated about 7° in a forward overrun direction about the axis 36 to rotate the selector plate 26 to, in turn, allow the reverse struts 22 to move from their disengaged positions in their pockets 20 to their engaged positions with the notches 30.
As previously mentioned, many clutch assemblies (such as the assembly 10 described in
It was discovered for clutch assemblies having: 1) the number of forward locking elements different than the number of reverse locking elements; 2) the number of forward locking formations different than the number of reverse locking formations; and 3) either the forward backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the reverse backlash or the reverse backlash is a non-zero integer multiple of the forward backlash that the coupling or clutching assembly was prevented from inadvertently binding in both directions about the rotational axis of its assembly.
When the above noted conditions are satisfied, the number of forward and reverse locking elements and the number of forward and reverse locking formations can be selected, so that minimum transitional backlash is substantially equal in all positions. The following table illustrates example possible combinations of forward and reverse locking elements (struts) and forward and reverse locking formations (notches):
Entry #2 is represented in
The above-noted discovery is applicable to any controllable ratcheting clutch assembly both radial and planar configurations such as the configurations shown in
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2960287 | Barlow | Nov 1960 | A |
3130989 | Lannen | Apr 1964 | A |
4050560 | Torstenfelt | Sep 1977 | A |
4056747 | Orris et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4200002 | Takahashi | Apr 1980 | A |
4340133 | Blersch | Jul 1982 | A |
5052534 | Gustin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5070978 | Pires | Dec 1991 | A |
5206573 | McCleer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5231265 | Hackett et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5362293 | Romanauskas | Nov 1994 | A |
5387854 | McCleer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394321 | McCleer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5449057 | Frank | Sep 1995 | A |
5453598 | Hackett et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5597057 | Ruth et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638929 | Park | Jun 1997 | A |
5642009 | McCleer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5678668 | Sink | Oct 1997 | A |
5806643 | Fitz | Sep 1998 | A |
5847469 | Tabata et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856709 | Ibaraki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871071 | Sink | Feb 1999 | A |
5918715 | Ruth et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927455 | Baker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954174 | Costin | Sep 1999 | A |
5964331 | Reed et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979627 | Ruth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6019699 | Hoshiya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065576 | Shaw et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075302 | McCleer | Jun 2000 | A |
6116394 | Ruth | Sep 2000 | A |
6125980 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129190 | Reed et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6186299 | Ruth | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193038 | Scott et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237931 | Marola | May 2001 | B1 |
6244965 | Klecker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6290044 | Burgman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306057 | Morisawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6344008 | Nagano et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6386349 | Welch | May 2002 | B1 |
6481551 | Ruth | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503167 | Sturm | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505721 | Welch | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6571926 | Pawley | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6814201 | Thomas | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846257 | Baker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854577 | Ruth | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6953409 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6982502 | Sendaula et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7025188 | Lindenschmidt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7093512 | Ibamoto et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100756 | Kimes et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153228 | Fujiu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198587 | Samie et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201690 | Miura et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223198 | Kimes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223200 | Kojima et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7255186 | Wakuta et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7256510 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258214 | Pawley et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275628 | Pawley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7344010 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349010 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7383930 | Kimes et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393296 | Kano et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397296 | Kiani | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7426971 | Kano et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7448481 | Kimes et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451862 | Kimes et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455156 | Kimes et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455157 | Kimes et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464801 | Wittkopp | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484605 | Pawley et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491151 | Maguire et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7614466 | Kano et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621359 | Kano et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7661518 | Kimes | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690455 | Kano et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7690492 | Gooden et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7806795 | Oba et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7942781 | Kimes | May 2011 | B2 |
8007396 | Kimes et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8051959 | Eisengruber | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061496 | Samie et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079453 | Kimes | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8187141 | Goleski et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8196724 | Samie et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8272488 | Eisengruber et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286772 | Eisengruber | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8324890 | Lin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8418825 | Bird | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8491439 | Kimes | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491440 | Kimes et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8720659 | Pawley | May 2014 | B2 |
8813929 | Kimes | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020000724 | Kalargeros et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040159517 | Thomas | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216975 | Ruth | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050279602 | Ruth | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021838 | Kimes et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060124425 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138777 | Hofbauer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185957 | Kimes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249345 | Ruth | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070056825 | Fetting, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107960 | Takami et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070278061 | Wittkopp et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080093190 | Belmont | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080110715 | Pawley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135369 | Meier | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169165 | Samie et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169166 | Wittkopp et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185253 | Kimes | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188338 | Kimes et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223681 | Stevenson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245360 | Almy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090062058 | Kimes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084653 | Holmes | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098970 | Kimes | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127059 | Knoblauch | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133981 | Tarasinski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142207 | Ring et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159391 | Eisengruber | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194381 | Samie et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211863 | Kimes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090233755 | Kimes | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090255773 | Seufert et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100071497 | Reisch et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100105515 | Goleski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100127693 | Wenzel et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100200358 | Eisengruber et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100230226 | Prout | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252384 | Eisengruber | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110233026 | Pawley | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110269587 | Papania | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120021862 | Isken, II et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120145505 | Kimes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149518 | Kimes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152683 | Kimes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152687 | Kimes et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120228076 | Tate, Jr. et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130062151 | Pawley | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130277164 | Prout et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140102844 | Greene et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140190785 | Fetting et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140284167 | Kimes | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140305761 | Kimes | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150000442 | Kimes et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1007475 | Oct 1965 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance and Fee(S) Due; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/675,840, filed Apr. 1, 2015; date mailed Dec. 3, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/056716; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/056749; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; related International application No. PCT/US2014/057140; date of issuance of report Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; related International application No. PCT/US2016/013836; date of mailing Mar. 30, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(S) Due; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,202; dated Sep. 14, 2015. |
Office Action; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/675,840; dated Oct. 2, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(S) Due; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,505; dated Aug. 1, 2016. |
Office Action; related U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,505; notification date May 19, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(S) Due; related U.S. Appl. No. 15/078,154; date mailed Sep. 12, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160290417 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |