The present invention is directed generally toward controllable refueling drogues and associated systems and methods, including refueling drogues having on-board guidance systems and actuators.
In-flight refueling (or air-to-air refueling) is an important method for extending the range of aircraft traveling long distances over areas having no feasible landing or refueling points. Although in-flight refueling is a relatively common operation, especially for military aircraft, the aircraft to be refueled (e.g., the receiver aircraft) must be precisely positioned relative to the tanker aircraft in order to provide safe engagement while the fuel is dispensed to the receiver aircraft. The requirement for precise relative spatial positioning of the two rapidly moving aircraft makes in-flight refueling a challenging operation.
There are currently two primary systems for in-flight refueling. One is a hose and drogue system, which includes a refueling hose having a drogue disposed at one end. The hose and drogue are trailed behind the tanker aircraft once the tanker aircraft is on station. The pilot of the receiver aircraft then flies the receiver aircraft to intercept and couple with the drogue for refueling. Another existing system is a boom refueling system. The boom refueling system typically includes a rigid boom extending from the tanker aircraft, with a probe and nozzle at its distal end. The boom also includes airfoils controlled by a boom operator stationed on the refueling aircraft. The airfoils allow the boom operator to actively maneuver the boom with respect to the receiver aircraft, which flies in a fixed refueling position below and aft of the tanker aircraft.
One approach to addressing the challenge associated with precisely positioning the tanker aircraft relative to the receiver aircraft is to automate the positioning process. For example, one existing arrangement for boom refueling systems includes cameras housed in the tanker aircraft to determine the distance between the receiver aircraft and the tip of a refueling boom carried by the tanker aircraft. The system can then be used to automatically control the position of the boom to mate with a corresponding refueling receptacle of the receiver aircraft. The system can be configured to allow the boom operator to take control of the movement of the boom, for example, if the automatic system malfunctions or if for any reason the refueling boom must be directed away from the receiver aircraft. However, the applicability of this system has been limited to certain boom-outfitted tanker aircraft and can in some cases significantly impact the cost of such aircraft.
The following summary is provided for the benefit of the reader only, and does not limit the invention as set forth by the claims. Aspects of the invention are directed generally to controllable refueling drogues and associated systems and methods. An airborne refueling system in accordance with one aspect of the invention includes a fuel delivery device having a deployable portion configured to be deployed overboard an aircraft during aerial refueling. The deployable portion can include at least a portion of a flexible fuel line and a drogue coupled to the flexible fuel line. An actuatable device can be operatively coupled to at least one of the drogue and the fuel line. The system can further include a guidance system carried by the deployable portion and operatively coupled to the actuatable device. The guidance system can include instructions to direct the operation of the actuatable device and move the drogue during flight.
In further particular aspects, the system can further include a refueling aircraft, with the fuel delivery device being carried by the refueling aircraft. The guidance system can, in at least some embodiments direct the operation of the actuatable device without instructions from the refueling aircraft when deployed. In still further embodiments, the system can include at least one sensor configured to detect a characteristic of a location of a receiver aircraft probe. The guidance system can be programmed to use the information received from the at least one sensor to direct the operation of the actuatable device to position the drogue for coupling with the receiver aircraft probe.
An airborne refueling system in accordance with another aspect of the invention can include a fuel delivery device that in turn includes a flexible fuel line and a drogue coupled to the flexible fuel line. The drogue can include multiple vanes arranged around an axis, and can further include a canopy coupled to the vanes. At least one actuator can be coupled to the canopy, or at least one of the vanes, or both the canopy and at least one of the vanes. In further specific embodiments, the actuator can include an electro-active polymer actuator.
A method for refueling an aircraft in accordance with another aspect of the invention can include aerially deploying from a tanker aircraft a portion of a refueling system that includes a flexible fuel line and a drogue. The method can further include automatically changing a position of the drogue by controlling an actuator operatively coupled to the drogue, based at least in part on information received from a guidance system carried by the deployed portion of the refueling system.
In further particular embodiments, the method can include guiding the drogue into a coupling position with a receiver aircraft, without guidance instructions from the tanker aircraft. The drogue can include multiple vanes arranged around an axis, and a canopy coupled to the vanes. Changing a position of the drogue can include steering the drogue by changing a position of the canopy, at least one of the vanes, or both the canopy and at least one of the vanes.
The present disclosure describes controllable refueling drogues and associated systems and methods for refueling aircraft with drogues. Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and in
Many embodiments of the invention described below may take the form of computer-executable instructions, including routines executed by a programmable computer. Those skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the invention can be practiced on computer systems other than those shown and described below. The invention can be embodied in a special-purpose computer or data processor that is specifically programmed, configured or constructed to perform one or more of the computer-executable instructions described below. Accordingly, the term “computer” as generally used herein refers to any data processor and can include multi-processor systems and/or networks. For example, the information can be processed in distributed environments, where tasks or modules are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules or subroutines may be located in local and remote memory storage devices. Aspects of the invention described below may be stored or distributed on computer-readable media, including magnetically readable or removable computer disks, as well as distributed over networks. Data structures and transmissions of data particular to aspects of the invention are also encompassed within the scope of the invention.
The drogue 124 can include actuators 251 to control the motion of the vanes 226 and/or the canopy 227. For example, the actuators 251 can include vane actuators 251a and/or canopy actuators 251b. The vane actuators 251a can be attached between alternate vanes 226, and can be configured to extend or retract. Accordingly, when a particular vane actuator 251a retracts, it can pull two vanes 226a, 226b together relative to an intermediate vane 226c. When the vane actuators 251a are extended, they can move the same two vanes 226a, 226b apart relative to the intermediate vane 226c.
The canopy actuators 251b can be attached to an inner and/or outer line of the canopy 227. For example, as shown in
The motion of the actuators 251 can be controlled by a guidance system 240 and a control system 250 carried by the deployable portion 121 of the fuel delivery device 120. The guidance system 240 can receive information corresponding to the current state of the drogue 124 and, in at least some embodiments, a target state of the drogue 124. The guidance system 240 can provide instructions to the control system 250 that in turn directs the actuators 251 to drive the configuration of the drogue 124 from the current state to the target state. In particular embodiments, the guidance system 240 can be coupled to a sensor system 230 that includes one or more accelerometers 232, one or more gyros 233, and an image sensor 231. The accelerometer 232 and/or gyros 233 can provide information corresponding to the current motion of the drogue 124, and the image sensor 231 can provide information corresponding to the location of the drogue 231. For example, the image sensor 231 can provide information corresponding to the location of the drogue 124 relative to a receiver aircraft that is approaching the drogue 231 for coupling. Further details of the interactions among the sensor system 230, the guidance system 240, the control system 250 and the actuators 251 are provided with reference to
In a particular aspect of an embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the aircraft identification function described above can be eliminated. For example, the resolution capability of the image sensor 231 may be such that it need only image the end of the probe 105 (independent of what type of receiver aircraft the probe is attached to) to provide appropriate guidance information. This can be the case for different aircraft having the same or different probes 105.
Another function that can be provided by the image sensor 231 includes providing information suitable for the guidance system 240 and control system 250 to steer the drogue 124 toward the probe 105 of the receiver aircraft 104. For example, if the data from image sensor 231 indicates that the probe 105 (or the visual cue markings 306) are off-center, then the guidance system 240 and control system 250 can steer the drogue 124 until it is centered on the probe 105. As described above, the sensor 231 can have a resolution capability sufficient to enable the steering function when used with probes 105 that may have different configurations.
One feature of an embodiment of the systems described above with reference to
In a further aspect of this embodiment, the motion of the drogue can be fully automated. This can even further reduce the workload required by the pilot of the receiver aircraft. For example, in some cases, this arrangement can allow the receiver aircraft pilot to remain on station (in much the same manner as is currently used when refueling an aircraft via a refueling boom) while the guidance system automatically steers the drogue to a coupling position with the receiver aircraft, and trims the drogue so that it remains in a stable position. An advantage of this arrangement is that it can increase the likelihood for a successful coupling with the receiver aircraft, and can reduce the likelihood for damage to the receiver aircraft or the refueling system. For example, in some refueling operations, the bow wave of the receiver aircraft can push the drogue away from the receiver aircraft every time the receiver aircraft gets close to the drogue. An embodiment of the foregoing automated system can automatically steer the drogue through the bow wave for a successful coupling.
Another feature of an embodiment of the systems described above with reference to
Yet another feature of at least some of the foregoing embodiments is that they can include changing the shape and/or size of the drogue. For example, the overall size of the drogue can be made larger or smaller, which can in turn make the drogue suitable for both low speed and high speed use. An advantage of this arrangement over existing arrangements is that the drogue need not be changed out when the tanker aircraft is required to refuel aircraft having different speeds when in a refueling. For example, by simply changing the shape of the drogue, the same drogue can be used to refuel helicopters, prop aircraft, and jet fighter aircraft, each of which has a different flight speed when located on station. In addition to changing the size of the drogue, the foregoing systems and methods can be used to change the shape of the drogue, e.g., in an asymmetric manner. An advantage of such shape changes is that they can enable the drogue to be steered into alignment with the receiver aircraft, and/or trimmed once in a desired position.
Many aspects of the foregoing embodiments can have particular configurations in some instances and other configurations in other instances. For example, the actuators can in some embodiments include electro-active polymer (EAP) actuators, to control the motion of the vanes and/or the canopy. Suitable actuators and designs are available from SRI International of Menlo Park, Calif. An advantage of EAP actuators is that they can apply a substantial force while remaining relatively small in size, and without requiring significant levels of power. In other embodiments, the actuators can have other configurations. The guidance system can in some embodiments include a single-board microcomputer, or another suitable, lightweight, low volume device. The sensors can include solid state sensors (e.g., MEMS or micro-electro-mechanical systems) for the gyros and/or accelerometers. The image sensor can be a combination of a laser 3-D imager, a laser ranger, an optical proximity sensor, a visible-spectrum camera, and/or an infrared camera.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the invention. For example, the sensors and/or actuators can have arrangements different than those described above, while still providing data and controlling drogue movement in manners generally similar to those described above. In some embodiments, some components of the system may be carried by the tanker aircraft without precluding the system from achieving at least some of the foregoing advantages. For example, aspects of the sensor system (e.g., the image sensor) and/or the guidance system may be housed in the tanker aircraft, while still allowing the system to steer and/or trim the drogue via the actuated vanes and/or canopy. The refueling system can be installed on aircraft having configurations other than the tanker aircraft 100 shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/157,245, filed Jun. 20, 2005, which issued on May 22, 2007 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,219,857.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
724675 | Decker | Apr 1908 | A |
2091916 | Evans | Aug 1937 | A |
2213680 | Barnett | Sep 1940 | A |
2414509 | Andre | Jan 1947 | A |
2453553 | Tansley | Nov 1948 | A |
2475635 | Parsons | Jul 1949 | A |
2552991 | McWhorter | May 1951 | A |
2668066 | Stadelhofer | Feb 1954 | A |
2670913 | Castor et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2859002 | Leisy | Nov 1958 | A |
2879017 | Smith | Mar 1959 | A |
2919937 | Dovey | Jan 1960 | A |
2941761 | Cox et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
2946543 | Gordon et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
2953332 | Cobham et al. | Sep 1960 | A |
2954190 | Le Clair | Sep 1960 | A |
2960295 | Schulz | Nov 1960 | A |
2967684 | Knecht | Jan 1961 | A |
2973171 | Ward et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3061246 | Kirby | Oct 1962 | A |
3091419 | Mosher | May 1963 | A |
3108769 | Hieber | Oct 1963 | A |
3112763 | Tennis et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3680311 | Harbonn et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3747873 | Layer et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3836117 | Panicall | Sep 1974 | A |
3917196 | Pond et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3928903 | Richardson et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4044834 | Perkins | Aug 1977 | A |
4072283 | Weiland | Feb 1978 | A |
4095761 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4119294 | Schnorrenberg | Oct 1978 | A |
4129270 | Robinson | Dec 1978 | A |
4149739 | Morris | Apr 1979 | A |
4150803 | Fernandez | Apr 1979 | A |
4231536 | Ishimitsu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4236686 | Barthelme et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4327784 | Denniston | May 1982 | A |
4340079 | Smith et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4408943 | McTamaney et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4438793 | Brown | Mar 1984 | A |
4471809 | Thomsen et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4477040 | Karanik | Oct 1984 | A |
4534384 | Graham et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4540144 | Perrella | Sep 1985 | A |
4586683 | Kerker | May 1986 | A |
4665936 | Furrer | May 1987 | A |
H297 | Schultz | Jul 1987 | H |
4717099 | Hubbard | Jan 1988 | A |
4796838 | Yamamoto | Jan 1989 | A |
4883102 | Gabrielyan et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4929000 | Annestedt, Sr. | May 1990 | A |
5131438 | Loucks | Jul 1992 | A |
5141178 | Alden et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5255877 | Lindgren et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5326052 | Krispin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5393015 | Piasecki | Feb 1995 | A |
5427333 | Kirkland | Jun 1995 | A |
5449203 | Sharp | Sep 1995 | A |
5449204 | Greene et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5499784 | Crabere et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5530650 | Biferno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539624 | Dougherty | Jul 1996 | A |
5573206 | Ward | Nov 1996 | A |
5662358 | Lees | Sep 1997 | A |
5785276 | Ruzicka | Jul 1998 | A |
5810292 | Garcia, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5904729 | Ruzicka | May 1999 | A |
5906336 | Eckstein | May 1999 | A |
5921294 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5996939 | Higgs et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6076555 | Hettinger | Jun 2000 | A |
6119981 | Young et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142421 | Palmer | Nov 2000 | A |
6145788 | Mouskis et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6302448 | Van Der Meer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305336 | Hara et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324295 | Valery et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326873 | Faria | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375123 | Greenhalgh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428054 | Zappa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454212 | Bartov | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464173 | Bandak | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467725 | Coles et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6588465 | Kirkland et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598830 | Ambrose et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601800 | Ollar | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604711 | Sinha et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6651933 | von Thal et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658329 | Howard et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669145 | Green | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676379 | Eccles et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6752357 | Thal et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6779758 | Vu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796527 | Munoz et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6819982 | Doane | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824105 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832743 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837462 | von Thal et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848720 | Carns et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866228 | Bartov | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6960750 | Doane | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7024309 | Doane | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7093801 | Schroeder | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097139 | Schroeder | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7213787 | Carns et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219857 | Takacs et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7380754 | James et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20030097658 | Richards | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115863 | Holt et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030136874 | Gjerdrum | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040195909 | Hamzeh et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060011782 | Schroeder | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060071475 | James et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060192053 | Crangle | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214059 | Smith | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060278759 | Carns et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284018 | Carns et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090261583 | Carns et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2744674 | Apr 1979 | DE |
3936198 | May 1990 | DE |
29901583 | May 1999 | DE |
10013751 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0236584 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0780292 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0807577 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1094001 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1361156 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1695911 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2260742 | Sep 1975 | FR |
2519723 | Jul 1983 | FR |
374873 | Jun 1932 | GB |
555984 | Sep 1943 | GB |
2237251 | Jan 1991 | GB |
2257458 | Jan 1993 | GB |
2298908 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2373488 | Sep 2002 | GB |
2 405 384 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2405384 | Mar 2005 | GB |
128459 | May 2003 | IL |
673798 | Jul 1979 | RU |
953345 | Aug 1982 | RU |
2111154 | May 1998 | RU |
2140381 | Oct 1999 | RU |
2142897 | Dec 1999 | RU |
386966 | Apr 2000 | TW |
WO-8502003 | May 1985 | WO |
WO-9106471 | May 1991 | WO |
WO-9733792 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-9807623 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9817938 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9839208 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO-9854053 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-0224529 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-02055385 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-02055385 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-02076826 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03102509 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080054124 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11157245 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11752156 | US |