Controlled electrochemical activation of carbon-based electrodes

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10041900
  • Patent Number
    10,041,900
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 27, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 7, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Certain embodiments of the present application describe a process to perform activation of carbon based electrodes in a controlled manner, where the degree of activation is monitored and calculated simultaneously with the ongoing activation process. Such an approach is intended to improve the reproducibility of electrodes that may include, but are not limited to, the following parameters: electrochemical capacitance, electrochemical transfer coefficient, amperiometric response to enzymatic reactions.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and process to perform activation of electrodes in a controlled manner.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In electrochemistry, activation of an electrode refers to a process that improves the electrochemical properties of a given electrode. For example, activation could affect the rate of electrochemical reaction. A possible method for such activation on carbon-based electrodes is an electrochemical one, where the process involves placing an electrode in a liquid medium at a selected potential as compared to the reference electrode. It has been reported that such a procedure both cleans the electrode surface and for various carbon-based materials introduces functional groups that may include carboxyl or quinone through faradic type reaction; those reactions that involve electron transfer from electrolyte to electrode.


Reported electrochemical activation procedures involve glassy carbon electrodes, pyrolytic carbon films, and screen-printed electrodes. The prior art describes the electrochemical activation (hereafter “activation”) process as applying a certain fixed potential to the working electrode for a fixed amount of time.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention describes a process and apparatus by which electrochemical activation is combined with some other measurement technique that can assess the degree of activation.


In certain embodiments of the present invention, a process may employ measurement of electrochemical capacitance, because this value may increase as more electrochemically active surface groups are introduced during a given activation process. The activation process may be allowed to continue until a target degree of activation is met, which may be some predefined electrode capacitance value.


In certain embodiments of the present invention, novel electrode apparatuses may be employed to perform the aforementioned processes.


Certain embodiments of the present invention may provide an advantage over alternate methods with respect to improved reproducibility of electrodes. For example, where the capacitance of an electrode depends both on electrochemically available area of an electrode and the number of surface functional groups, electrodes with narrower distribution of their given capacitances may translate to better reproducibility for other electrochemical reactions, compared with another group of electrodes where their capacitance values form a much broader distribution.


In certain embodiments of the present invention an electrode may be a carbon-based electrode, while in other embodiments of the present invention an electrode may comprising a different conductive materials (e.g., gold, platinum, palladium, etc.).


Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description. One or more of the above-disclosed embodiments, in addition to certain alternatives, are provided in further detail below with reference to the attached figures. The invention is not limited to any particular embodiment disclosed; the present invention may be employed in not only sensor applications, but in other applications as well. As used herein, “substantially” shall mean that at least 40% of components are of a given type.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is better understood from reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:



FIGS. 1A-1E are schematic representations of an electrode apparatus and device fabrication process according to certain embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a graph of sensor potential as a function of time during activation process according to certain embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a graph of capacitance of all 8 pads of an experimental embodiment as a function of activation cycle according to certain embodiments of the present invention (note: the activation process started on the 7th measurement);



FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs showing the normalized capacitance for pads before and after activation according to certain embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a graph showing the response of the differently activated 8-plex devices to HRP according to certain embodiments of the present invention;



FIGS. 6A and 6B are graphs showing sample real-time activation data (Controlled activation (FIG. 6A) versus Fixed number of cycles (FIG. 6B)) according to certain embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a graph showing the response of 8-plex device to different concentrations of HRP (log-log scale) according to certain embodiments of the present invention (note: the ratio of the response to 0.01 ng/ml to 0 ng/ml is approximately ten); and



FIG. 8 is a table showing a performance comparison between controlled and fixed number of cycles activation protocols.





Features, elements, and aspects of the invention that are referenced by the same numerals in different figures represent the same, equivalent, or similar features, elements, or aspects in accordance with one or more embodiments of the system. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that features, elements and aspects of the invention depicted in the figures in a similar or identical manner may be similar or identical, even if, for example, a plurality of such features, elements and aspects are not individually labeled.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

An electrode apparatus according to certain embodiments of the present invention comprised an 8 pad electrode screen-printed sensor (“8-plex device”). This device was employed to demonstrate activation processes according to certain embodiments of the present invention.


Referring to FIG. 1A, the 8-plex device may be fabricated by first screen-printing silver ink contact traces 110 on a plastic flexible substrate.


Referring to FIG. 1B, silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) inks may then be screen-printed to form a reference electrode 120.


Referring to FIG. 1C, carbon inks (e.g., proprietary inks) may then be screen-printed to form 8 sensor pads (working electrodes, sensor electrodes) 130.


Referring to FIG. 1D, an insulation layer 140 may then be screen-printed, for example, to have only sensing pads and reference electrodes be exposed to liquid.


Referring to FIG. 1E, a plastic top part 150 with 8 openings may then be glued on top of the plastic to form 8 isolated wells for liquid application.


Electrode apparatuses, e.g., 8-plex devices as described above, according to certain embodiments of the present invention may be connected to an electronic measuring setup that allows setting the user-defined voltage V (V) on the reference electrode and measuring individual pad currents I (A).


Referring to FIG. 2, in certain embodiments of the present invention controlled activation may be represented by the following procedure. First, a sensor may be exposed to an aqueous solution. Any number of aqueous solutions may be used, including but not limited to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.2 and phosphate-citrate buffer pH 5.0, without departing from the scope of the present invention. Next, the potential on the sensor may be applied in the cyclic manner as shown in FIG. 2.


After application of activation potential (Vact) versus the potential of the reference electrode for a certain period (Tact), the potential may be brought back down to the value (Vcontrol) where the sensor does not normally participate in faradic reactions with electrolyte, and the controlling capacitance measurement is performed. Finally, after staying there for a predefined amount of time (Twait) at the controlled potential, a small sine wave may be superimposed around Vcontrol for a time that would be necessary enough to measure the capacitance (Tmeasure). For a given measurement, both sensor potential V(t) and current I(t) may be recorded, and at the end of each cycle the last sine wave may be analyzed and its amplitude Iampl, offset Iofst, and phase shift (φ) between voltage and current may be calculated. The capacitance may then be estimated by the following equation:









C
=


I
ampl



V
ampl

·
2
·
π
·
f
·

sin


(
φ
)








EQ
.




1







where Vampl is the amplitude of the applied potential wave, and f is the frequency.


The activation cycle may be ended when the capacitance becomes greater or equal to some predefined target value Cfinal.


In certain sample embodiments of the present invention, preferred values of the parameters mentioned above may be set but not limited to Vact=1.5 V, Tact=1 sec, Vcontrol=0.2 V, Twait=2 sec, Tmeasure=2 sec, f=10 Hz, Vampl=0.015 V.


Referring to FIG. 3, real-time controlled activation data with Cfinal set to 600 nF (e.g., pads would target this value as their final capacitance) demonstrates functional aspects of certain embodiments of the present invention. Specifically, a key merit of such embodiments is that the pads do not reach the target capacitance value at the same time, emphasizing the possible importance of activation process control for each individual pad.


Referring to FIG. 4, in addition to the real-time data, the capacitance of 8-plex device was measured at different voltages before and after activation process for certain embodiments of the present invention. The data was then normalized to the average capacitance of all 8 pads.


Analysis of the experiment, corresponding to certain embodiments of the present invention, indicates that the data set of the minimal capacitances of 8 pads before activation process had coefficient of variation (CV %) approximately 3.1%. After controlled activation procedure, CV % has been reduced to 0.4% or roughly 8-fold improvement in the variability of their capacitance values. Further improvements in the algorithm of the controlled activation process described above may lead to even greater reductions of capacitance variability amongst, for example, large numbers of electrodes.


A controlled activation procedure according to certain embodiments of the present invention, e.g., as described above, may be employed to improve the precision of a given immunological electrochemical biosensor that has carbon-based electrodes. The sample embodiment below describes a HRP (horseradish peroxidase) enzyme sensor that served as a model system.


Construction of the Immunological Sensor


Immunological sensors according to certain further embodiments of the present invention were constructed by first exposing each pad of an 8-plex device to 100 μL of PBS buffer containing anti-HRP antibodies. Next, some devices were controlled activated to 1000 nF per pad, others to 400 nF per pad, while the rest were not activated (the “as is” capacitance was approximately 115 nF per pad). The activation to higher than 1000 nF capacitance values appeared to be unreasonable since it could lead to pad degradation and undesirable higher response to zero control. After that, all devices were left at room temperature for 2 hours to allow antibody adsorption to the pad surface. Finally, all devices were washed and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with a protein-based blocking buffer to prevent non-specific background.


To demonstrate the functionality of the aforementioned 8-plex device as an immunological sensor subsequent to activation, 8 pads of the 8-plex device were exposed to 10, 3.2, 1, 0.32, 0.1, 0.032, 0.010, 0 ng/mL HRP, such that the 8th pad served as a negative (zero) control. After 40 minute incubation with target (HRP) at room temperature, the 8-plex devices were washed and the fluid wells were filled with tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) based substrate that generates electrochemically active product in the presence of HRP.


Referring to FIG. 5, device responses indicate that in certain embodiments of the present invention, controlled activation to 1000 nF may provide the best sensitivity (higher slope) while keeping background signal almost as low as in the case of non-activated device. Based on this information, for the experiments described below, Cfinal was set to 1000 nF.


Referring to FIGS. 6A and 6B, to demonstrate precision improvement according to certain embodiments of the present invention, immunological sensors were constructed by first exposing each pad of 8-plex device to 100 μL of PBS buffer containing anti-HRP antibodies and then some of 8-plex devices went through a controlled activation procedure for each pad with Cfinal set to 1000 nF. Other 8-plex devices were activated for the fixed number of cycles without individual pad control to reach average 8-plex pad capacitance 1000 nF. Devices were left at room temperature for 2 hours to allow antibody adsorption to the pad surface. After that, devices were washed and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with a protein-based blocking buffer to prevent non-specific background. In both controlled and fixed number of cycles activation protocols, a dose response after incubation with HRP for 60 minutes were very similar with a typical data shown in FIG. 8.


Referring to FIG. 7, response data of an 8-plex device according to certain sample embodiments of the present invention to different concentrations of HRP (log-log scale) indicated that a ratio of the response to 0.01 ng/ml to 0 ng/ml is approximately ten.


In order to evaluate the precision improvement, the group of six 8-plex devices was exposed to 1 ng/ml HRP. Out of six sample devices, three went through controlled activation procedure, while the other three were activated for the fixed number of cycles. Results are summarized in FIG. 8, and indicate a coefficient of variation (CV %) for all pads for the group that went through controlled activation protocol was approximately two fold lower, 7.41% as compared to 15.56%, or rather the precision was twice as tight compared with the uncontrolled group. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that with additional modification to the controlled activation method it may be possible to further improve the precision of the immunological sensor.


Larger scale embodiments of the controlled activation process described above are within the scope of the present invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention for electrochemical sensors with carbon-based electrodes may include, but are not limited to, the following routine. A set of screen-printed carbon-based electrodes is placed in the controlled environment chamber (for example 37 C, 50% relative humidity) with each sensor connected to an electronic setup capable of performing controlled activation procedure described above. Next, a solution containing the bio-functionalization reagents (for example antibodies in PBS buffer) is introduced on top of the sensors and controlled activation procedure is carried out for each sensor. The quality control (QC) is performed at the same time: If a sensor fails to reach predefined Cfinal value within certain range of activation cycles, then this sensor is considered as failed and will not be used for the next steps. The sensors that pass the QC step will go through the next manufacturing steps that can include but not limited to non-specific binding blocking, placing of dried reporter antibodies next to sensor area, integration of the electrodes with plastic sample delivery cartridges, and packaging integrated cartridges for the long-term storage.


The present invention has been described above with reference to preferred features and embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that changes and modifications may be made in these preferred embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, those skilled in the art will recognize that although exemplary embodiments have been described above with respect to carbon-based electrodes, the present invention is also applicable to electrodes comprising other conductive materials (e.g., gold, platinum, palladium, etc.).

Claims
  • 1. An electrochemical sensor, comprising: a reference electrode;a first screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode having a first electrochemical capacitance with respect to the reference electrode; anda second screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode having a second electrochemical capacitance with respect to the reference electrode;wherein the first electrochemical capacitance and the second electrochemical capacitance have a CV % between 0.4% and 1%.
  • 2. The electrochemical sensor of claim 1, wherein the first electrochemical capacitance and the second electrochemical capacitance have a value between 4 uF/cm^2 and 10 uF/cm^2.
  • 3. The electrochemical sensor of claim 1, wherein the first screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode and the second screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode were both controllably activated.
  • 4. The electrochemical sensor of claim 3, wherein the first screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode and the second screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode were both controllably activated by exposing the first screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode and the second screen-printed carbon-based sensor electrode to an aqueous solution and cyclically applying a first electric potential to the first carbon-based sensor electrode and a second electric potential to the second carbon-based sensor electrode versus the reference electrode.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/511,143, filed May 22, 2012 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” which claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/054591, filed Dec. 29, 2010 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/263,774, filed Nov. 23, 2009 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (99)
Number Name Date Kind
4554064 McClintock et al. Nov 1985 A
5096669 Lauks et al. Mar 1992 A
5118403 Magee et al. Jun 1992 A
5120420 Nankai Jun 1992 A
5324400 Eliash et al. Jun 1994 A
5399256 Bohs Mar 1995 A
5624597 Buhl et al. Apr 1997 A
5628890 Carter et al. May 1997 A
5744096 Jones et al. Apr 1998 A
5834220 Wicks et al. Nov 1998 A
6123820 Bergkuist et al. Sep 2000 A
6251684 Buhl et al. Jun 2001 B1
6342347 Bauer Jan 2002 B1
6361958 Shieh et al. Mar 2002 B1
6376206 Katus et al. Apr 2002 B1
6426230 Feistel Jul 2002 B1
6565738 Henning et al. May 2003 B1
6576461 Heller et al. Jun 2003 B2
6627404 Buechler et al. Sep 2003 B1
6689317 Rees Feb 2004 B1
6750053 Widrig Opalsky et al. Jun 2004 B1
6845327 Lauks Jan 2005 B2
6923894 Huang et al. Aug 2005 B2
7202042 Buechler Apr 2007 B2
7238519 Bellet et al. Jul 2007 B2
7335294 Heller et al. Feb 2008 B2
7419821 Davis et al. Sep 2008 B2
7427490 Valkirs et al. Sep 2008 B2
7476360 Gau et al. Jan 2009 B2
7497997 Glezer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7598091 Wang Oct 2009 B2
7723099 Miller et al. May 2010 B2
7771583 Diamond et al. Aug 2010 B2
7842234 Lauks et al. Nov 2010 B2
7906009 Heller et al. Mar 2011 B2
7938573 Gau et al. May 2011 B2
8084272 Campbell et al. Dec 2011 B2
8110392 Battrell et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114612 Buechler et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123920 Iyengar et al. Feb 2012 B2
8152991 Briman et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163163 Purvis Apr 2012 B2
8273566 Billadeau et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283155 Holmes et al. Oct 2012 B2
8357495 Mattingly et al. Jan 2013 B2
8367398 Lee et al. Feb 2013 B2
8425745 Briman et al. Apr 2013 B2
8506908 Benn et al. Aug 2013 B2
8510067 Zelin et al. Aug 2013 B2
8530230 Stromgren et al. Sep 2013 B2
8591817 Gau Nov 2013 B1
8591829 Taylor et al. Nov 2013 B2
8691592 Chen et al. Apr 2014 B2
8697009 Saltsman et al. Apr 2014 B2
8765062 Linder et al. Jul 2014 B2
8765075 Miller et al. Jul 2014 B2
8988079 Briman et al. Mar 2015 B2
9000769 Briman Apr 2015 B2
9144419 Poirier et al. Sep 2015 B2
9234867 Briman et al. Jan 2016 B2
9291613 Bryant et al. Mar 2016 B2
20020114739 Weigl et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030190608 Blackburn Oct 2003 A1
20040002161 Sin Jan 2004 A1
20050009101 Blackburn Jan 2005 A1
20050118061 Mototsu Jun 2005 A1
20050130296 Pisharody et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050211559 Kayyem Sep 2005 A1
20060046300 Padmanabhan et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060166090 Grigorian et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060205061 Roukes Sep 2006 A1
20060275852 Montagu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070093704 Brister et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070158618 Song et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070263046 Iwasa et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070284557 Gruner et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009002 Gruner et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090030293 Cooper et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090042280 Yang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090159464 Hyland et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169467 Zhamu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169725 Zhamu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090240166 Wang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090253149 Ahrens et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090305135 Shi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100075311 Barrault et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100143194 Lee et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110003313 Mendel-Hartvig et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110045505 Warthoe et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110201099 Anderson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110201312 Peterson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110220656 Gau Sep 2011 A1
20120231488 Marshall et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120255860 Briman et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130309778 Lowe et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140138260 Briman May 2014 A1
20140141484 Campbell et al. May 2014 A1
20160123947 Briman et al. May 2016 A1
20170199152 Briman Jul 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
WO9622730 Aug 1996 WO
WO0142473 Jun 2001 WO
WO2004061418 Jul 2004 WO
WO2011071772 Jun 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Dock et al. “A steady-state and flow-through cell for screen-printed eight-electrode arrays,” Analytica Chimica Acta 531 (2005) 165-172.
Maeda et al., “Surface Characterization of Glassy Carbon Electrodes Anodized in 1-Alkanols by Their Wettability and Capacitance,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 44(12) 2294-2299 (1996).
Maeda et al., “Modification of Glassy Carbon Surfaces by Anodic Oxidation in 1-Alkanols,” Novel Trends in Electrooganic Synthesis, 1998, 157-160.
Mizutani et al., “Amperometric glucose sensor using glassy carbon electrode anodized in 1,5-pentanediol as the base transducer,” T.IEE Japan, vol. 119-E, No. 11, 1999, 554-559.
Maeda et al., “Voltammetric Behaviors of Dopamine and Ascorbic Acid at a Glassy Carbon Electrode Anodized in 1, ω-Alkanediol,” Analytical Sciences, Dec. 1995, vol. 11, 947-922.
Engstrom, “Electrochemical Pretreatment of Glassy Carbon Electrodes,” Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 2310-2314.
Karel {hacek over (S)}tulik, “Activation of Solid Electrodes,” Electroanalysis, 41(1992) 829-834.
Fernández-Sánchez et al., “AC voltammetric carbon paste-based enzyme immunosensors,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 14 (2000) 917-924.
Hance et al., “Effect of Glassy Carbon Pretreatment on Background Double-Layer Capacitance and Adsorption of Neutral Organic Molecules,” Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 131-134.
Yee et al., “Disposable thick-film amperometric biosensor with multiple working electrodes fabricated on a single substrate,” Sensors and Actuators B 34 (1996) 490-492.
Wang et al. “Enhancement of electrochemical properties of screen-printed carbon electrodes by oxygen plasma treatment,” Electrochemica Acta 54 (2009) 4937-4943.
Park et al., “Amperometric biosensor for determination of ethanol vapor,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 10 (1995) 587-594 (Year: 1995).
Wang, J., et al., Electrochemical activation of screen-printed carbon strips. Analyst, 1996. 121(3): p. 345-350.
Anjo, D., et al., Electrochemical activation of carbon electrodes in base: Minimization of dopamine adsorption and electrode capacitance. Anal. Chem., 1989. 61: p. 2603-2608.
Beilby, A.L., W. Brooks, and G.L. Lawrence, Comparison of the Pyrolytic Carbon Film Electrode with the Wax Impregnated Graphite Electrode. Analytical Chemistry, 1964. 36(1): p. 22-26.
Alwarappan et al.; Probing the electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheets for biosensing applications; J. Phys. Chem.; 113(20); pp. 8853-8857; Apr. 2009.
Bleda-Martinez et al.; Electrochemical methods to enhance the capacitance in activated carbon/polyaniline composites (proof copy); Journal of the Electrochemical Society; 155(10); pp. A672-A678; Jul. 2008.
Engstrom; Electrochemical pretreatment of glassy carbon electrodes; Anal. Chem.; 54(13); pp. 2310-2314; Nov. 1982.
Lu et al.; Nanometal-decorated exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet based glucose biosensors with high sensitivity and fast response; ACS Nano; 2(9); pp. 1825-1832; Sep. 2008.
Maeda et al.; Voltammetric behaviors of dopamine and ascorbic acid at a glassy carbon electrode anodized in 1, ?-akanediol; Analytical Sciences; 11(6); pp. 947-922; Dec. 1995.
Nian et al.; Nitric acid modification of activated carbon electrodes for improvement of electrochemical capacitance; Journal of the The Electrochemical society; 149(8); pp. A1008-A1014; Jul. 2002.
Ranganathan et al.; Facile preparation of active glassy carbon electrodes with activated carbon and organic solvents; Anal. Chem.; 71(16); pp. 3574-3580; Aug. 1999.
Shan et al.; Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and biosensing for glucose based on graphene; Anal. Chem.; 81(6); pp. 2378-2382; Mar. 2009.
Tang et al.; Preparation, structure, and electrochemical properties of reduced graphene sheet films; Adv. Funct. Mater.; 19(17); pp. 2782-2789; Sep. 2009.
Wang et al; Application of graphene-modified electrode for selective detection of dopamine; Electrochemistry Communications; 11(4); pp. 889-892; Apr. 2009.
Beilby et al.; A pyrolytic carbon film electrode for voltammetry; Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry; 248(2); pp. 283-304; Jul. 1988.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150168331 A1 Jun 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61263774 Nov 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13511143 US
Child 14633145 US