The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and process to perform activation of electrodes in a controlled manner.
In electrochemistry, activation of an electrode refers to a process that improves the electrochemical properties of a given electrode. For example, activation could affect the rate of electrochemical reaction. A possible method for such activation on carbon-based electrodes is an electrochemical one, where the process involves placing an electrode in a liquid medium at a selected potential as compared to the reference electrode. It has been reported that such a procedure both cleans the electrode surface and for various carbon-based materials introduces functional groups that may include carboxyl or quinone through faradic type reaction; those reactions that involve electron transfer from electrolyte to electrode.
Reported electrochemical activation procedures involve glassy carbon electrodes, pyrolytic carbon films, and screen-printed electrodes. The prior art describes the electrochemical activation (hereafter “activation”) process as applying a certain fixed potential to the working electrode for a fixed amount of time.
The present invention describes a process and apparatus by which electrochemical activation is combined with some other measurement technique that can assess the degree of activation.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, a process may employ measurement of electrochemical capacitance, because this value may increase as more electrochemically active surface groups are introduced during a given activation process. The activation process may be allowed to continue until a target degree of activation is met, which may be some predefined electrode capacitance value.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, novel electrode apparatuses may be employed to perform the aforementioned processes.
Certain embodiments of the present invention may provide an advantage over alternate methods with respect to improved reproducibility of electrodes. For example, where the capacitance of an electrode depends both on electrochemically available area of an electrode and the number of surface functional groups, electrodes with narrower distribution of their given capacitances may translate to better reproducibility for other electrochemical reactions, compared with another group of electrodes where their capacitance values form a much broader distribution.
In certain embodiments of the present invention an electrode may be a carbon-based electrode, while in other embodiments of the present invention an electrode may comprising a different conductive materials (e.g., gold, platinum, palladium, etc.).
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description. One or more of the above-disclosed embodiments, in addition to certain alternatives, are provided in further detail below with reference to the attached figures. The invention is not limited to any particular embodiment disclosed; the present invention may be employed in not only sensor applications, but in other applications as well. As used herein, “substantially” shall mean that at least 40% of components are of a given type.
The invention is better understood from reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Features, elements, and aspects of the invention that are referenced by the same numerals in different figures represent the same, equivalent, or similar features, elements, or aspects in accordance with one or more embodiments of the system. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that features, elements and aspects of the invention depicted in the figures in a similar or identical manner may be similar or identical, even if, for example, a plurality of such features, elements and aspects are not individually labeled.
An electrode apparatus according to certain embodiments of the present invention comprised an 8 pad electrode screen-printed sensor (“8-plex device”). This device was employed to demonstrate activation processes according to certain embodiments of the present invention.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Electrode apparatuses, e.g., 8-plex devices as described above, according to certain embodiments of the present invention may be connected to an electronic measuring setup that allows setting the user-defined voltage V (V) on the reference electrode and measuring individual pad currents I (A).
Referring to
After application of activation potential (Vact) versus the potential of the reference electrode for a certain period (Tact), the potential may be brought back down to the value (Vcontrol) where the sensor does not normally participate in faradic reactions with electrolyte, and the controlling capacitance measurement is performed. Finally, after staying there for a predefined amount of time (Twait) at the controlled potential, a small sine wave may be superimposed around Vcontrol for a time that would be necessary enough to measure the capacitance (Tmeasure). For a given measurement, both sensor potential V(t) and current I(t) may be recorded, and at the end of each cycle the last sine wave may be analyzed and its amplitude Iampl, offset Iofst, and phase shift (φ) between voltage and current may be calculated. The capacitance may then be estimated by the following equation:
where Vampl is the amplitude of the applied potential wave, and f is the frequency.
The activation cycle may be ended when the capacitance becomes greater or equal to some predefined target value Cfinal.
In certain sample embodiments of the present invention, preferred values of the parameters mentioned above may be set but not limited to Vact=1.5 V, Tact=1 sec, Vcontrol=0.2 V, Twait=2 sec, Tmeasure=2 sec, f=10 Hz, Vampl=0.015 V.
Referring to
Referring to
Analysis of the experiment, corresponding to certain embodiments of the present invention, indicates that the data set of the minimal capacitances of 8 pads before activation process had coefficient of variation (CV %) approximately 3.1%. After controlled activation procedure, CV % has been reduced to 0.4% or roughly 8-fold improvement in the variability of their capacitance values. Further improvements in the algorithm of the controlled activation process described above may lead to even greater reductions of capacitance variability amongst, for example, large numbers of electrodes.
A controlled activation procedure according to certain embodiments of the present invention, e.g., as described above, may be employed to improve the precision of a given immunological electrochemical biosensor that has carbon-based electrodes. The sample embodiment below describes a HRP (horseradish peroxidase) enzyme sensor that served as a model system.
Construction of the Immunological Sensor
Immunological sensors according to certain further embodiments of the present invention were constructed by first exposing each pad of an 8-plex device to 100 μL of PBS buffer containing anti-HRP antibodies. Next, some devices were controlled activated to 1000 nF per pad, others to 400 nF per pad, while the rest were not activated (the “as is” capacitance was approximately 115 nF per pad). The activation to higher than 1000 nF capacitance values appeared to be unreasonable since it could lead to pad degradation and undesirable higher response to zero control. After that, all devices were left at room temperature for 2 hours to allow antibody adsorption to the pad surface. Finally, all devices were washed and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with a protein-based blocking buffer to prevent non-specific background.
To demonstrate the functionality of the aforementioned 8-plex device as an immunological sensor subsequent to activation, 8 pads of the 8-plex device were exposed to 10, 3.2, 1, 0.32, 0.1, 0.032, 0.010, 0 ng/mL HRP, such that the 8th pad served as a negative (zero) control. After 40 minute incubation with target (HRP) at room temperature, the 8-plex devices were washed and the fluid wells were filled with tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) based substrate that generates electrochemically active product in the presence of HRP.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In order to evaluate the precision improvement, the group of six 8-plex devices was exposed to 1 ng/ml HRP. Out of six sample devices, three went through controlled activation procedure, while the other three were activated for the fixed number of cycles. Results are summarized in
Larger scale embodiments of the controlled activation process described above are within the scope of the present invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention for electrochemical sensors with carbon-based electrodes may include, but are not limited to, the following routine. A set of screen-printed carbon-based electrodes is placed in the controlled environment chamber (for example 37 C, 50% relative humidity) with each sensor connected to an electronic setup capable of performing controlled activation procedure described above. Next, a solution containing the bio-functionalization reagents (for example antibodies in PBS buffer) is introduced on top of the sensors and controlled activation procedure is carried out for each sensor. The quality control (QC) is performed at the same time: If a sensor fails to reach predefined Cfinal value within certain range of activation cycles, then this sensor is considered as failed and will not be used for the next steps. The sensors that pass the QC step will go through the next manufacturing steps that can include but not limited to non-specific binding blocking, placing of dried reporter antibodies next to sensor area, integration of the electrodes with plastic sample delivery cartridges, and packaging integrated cartridges for the long-term storage.
The present invention has been described above with reference to preferred features and embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that changes and modifications may be made in these preferred embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, those skilled in the art will recognize that although exemplary embodiments have been described above with respect to carbon-based electrodes, the present invention is also applicable to electrodes comprising other conductive materials (e.g., gold, platinum, palladium, etc.).
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/511,143, filed May 22, 2012 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” which claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/054591, filed Dec. 29, 2010 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/263,774, filed Nov. 23, 2009 and entitled “CONTROLLED ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVATION OF CARBON-BASED ELECTRODES,” all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4554064 | McClintock et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
5096669 | Lauks et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5118403 | Magee et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5120420 | Nankai | Jun 1992 | A |
5324400 | Eliash et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5399256 | Bohs | Mar 1995 | A |
5624597 | Buhl et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628890 | Carter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5744096 | Jones et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5834220 | Wicks et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6123820 | Bergkuist et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6251684 | Buhl et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6342347 | Bauer | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361958 | Shieh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376206 | Katus et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6426230 | Feistel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6565738 | Henning et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576461 | Heller et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6627404 | Buechler et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6689317 | Rees | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6750053 | Widrig Opalsky et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6845327 | Lauks | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6923894 | Huang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7202042 | Buechler | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238519 | Bellet et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7335294 | Heller et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7419821 | Davis et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427490 | Valkirs et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7476360 | Gau et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497997 | Glezer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7598091 | Wang | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7723099 | Miller et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7771583 | Diamond et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7842234 | Lauks et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7906009 | Heller et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938573 | Gau et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8084272 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8110392 | Battrell et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114612 | Buechler et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123920 | Iyengar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8152991 | Briman et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163163 | Purvis | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8273566 | Billadeau et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283155 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8357495 | Mattingly et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8367398 | Lee et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425745 | Briman et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8506908 | Benn et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510067 | Zelin et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8530230 | Stromgren et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8591817 | Gau | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8591829 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8691592 | Chen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8697009 | Saltsman et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8765062 | Linder et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8765075 | Miller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8988079 | Briman et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000769 | Briman | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9144419 | Poirier et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9234867 | Briman et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9291613 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20020114739 | Weigl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030190608 | Blackburn | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002161 | Sin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050009101 | Blackburn | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050118061 | Mototsu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130296 | Pisharody et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211559 | Kayyem | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060046300 | Padmanabhan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060166090 | Grigorian et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060205061 | Roukes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060275852 | Montagu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070093704 | Brister et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070158618 | Song et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070263046 | Iwasa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284557 | Gruner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009002 | Gruner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090030293 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042280 | Yang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090159464 | Hyland et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169467 | Zhamu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169725 | Zhamu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240166 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253149 | Ahrens et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305135 | Shi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100075311 | Barrault et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100143194 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110003313 | Mendel-Hartvig et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110045505 | Warthoe et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110201099 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201312 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110220656 | Gau | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120231488 | Marshall et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255860 | Briman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130309778 | Lowe et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140138260 | Briman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141484 | Campbell et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20160123947 | Briman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170199152 | Briman | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9622730 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO0142473 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2004061418 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2011071772 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dock et al. “A steady-state and flow-through cell for screen-printed eight-electrode arrays,” Analytica Chimica Acta 531 (2005) 165-172. |
Maeda et al., “Surface Characterization of Glassy Carbon Electrodes Anodized in 1-Alkanols by Their Wettability and Capacitance,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 44(12) 2294-2299 (1996). |
Maeda et al., “Modification of Glassy Carbon Surfaces by Anodic Oxidation in 1-Alkanols,” Novel Trends in Electrooganic Synthesis, 1998, 157-160. |
Mizutani et al., “Amperometric glucose sensor using glassy carbon electrode anodized in 1,5-pentanediol as the base transducer,” T.IEE Japan, vol. 119-E, No. 11, 1999, 554-559. |
Maeda et al., “Voltammetric Behaviors of Dopamine and Ascorbic Acid at a Glassy Carbon Electrode Anodized in 1, ω-Alkanediol,” Analytical Sciences, Dec. 1995, vol. 11, 947-922. |
Engstrom, “Electrochemical Pretreatment of Glassy Carbon Electrodes,” Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 2310-2314. |
Karel {hacek over (S)}tulik, “Activation of Solid Electrodes,” Electroanalysis, 41(1992) 829-834. |
Fernández-Sánchez et al., “AC voltammetric carbon paste-based enzyme immunosensors,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 14 (2000) 917-924. |
Hance et al., “Effect of Glassy Carbon Pretreatment on Background Double-Layer Capacitance and Adsorption of Neutral Organic Molecules,” Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 131-134. |
Yee et al., “Disposable thick-film amperometric biosensor with multiple working electrodes fabricated on a single substrate,” Sensors and Actuators B 34 (1996) 490-492. |
Wang et al. “Enhancement of electrochemical properties of screen-printed carbon electrodes by oxygen plasma treatment,” Electrochemica Acta 54 (2009) 4937-4943. |
Park et al., “Amperometric biosensor for determination of ethanol vapor,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 10 (1995) 587-594 (Year: 1995). |
Wang, J., et al., Electrochemical activation of screen-printed carbon strips. Analyst, 1996. 121(3): p. 345-350. |
Anjo, D., et al., Electrochemical activation of carbon electrodes in base: Minimization of dopamine adsorption and electrode capacitance. Anal. Chem., 1989. 61: p. 2603-2608. |
Beilby, A.L., W. Brooks, and G.L. Lawrence, Comparison of the Pyrolytic Carbon Film Electrode with the Wax Impregnated Graphite Electrode. Analytical Chemistry, 1964. 36(1): p. 22-26. |
Alwarappan et al.; Probing the electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheets for biosensing applications; J. Phys. Chem.; 113(20); pp. 8853-8857; Apr. 2009. |
Bleda-Martinez et al.; Electrochemical methods to enhance the capacitance in activated carbon/polyaniline composites (proof copy); Journal of the Electrochemical Society; 155(10); pp. A672-A678; Jul. 2008. |
Engstrom; Electrochemical pretreatment of glassy carbon electrodes; Anal. Chem.; 54(13); pp. 2310-2314; Nov. 1982. |
Lu et al.; Nanometal-decorated exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet based glucose biosensors with high sensitivity and fast response; ACS Nano; 2(9); pp. 1825-1832; Sep. 2008. |
Maeda et al.; Voltammetric behaviors of dopamine and ascorbic acid at a glassy carbon electrode anodized in 1, ?-akanediol; Analytical Sciences; 11(6); pp. 947-922; Dec. 1995. |
Nian et al.; Nitric acid modification of activated carbon electrodes for improvement of electrochemical capacitance; Journal of the The Electrochemical society; 149(8); pp. A1008-A1014; Jul. 2002. |
Ranganathan et al.; Facile preparation of active glassy carbon electrodes with activated carbon and organic solvents; Anal. Chem.; 71(16); pp. 3574-3580; Aug. 1999. |
Shan et al.; Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and biosensing for glucose based on graphene; Anal. Chem.; 81(6); pp. 2378-2382; Mar. 2009. |
Tang et al.; Preparation, structure, and electrochemical properties of reduced graphene sheet films; Adv. Funct. Mater.; 19(17); pp. 2782-2789; Sep. 2009. |
Wang et al; Application of graphene-modified electrode for selective detection of dopamine; Electrochemistry Communications; 11(4); pp. 889-892; Apr. 2009. |
Beilby et al.; A pyrolytic carbon film electrode for voltammetry; Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry; 248(2); pp. 283-304; Jul. 1988. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150168331 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61263774 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13511143 | US | |
Child | 14633145 | US |