This invention relates to the field of propellant gas delivery systems. More specifically, the invention comprises an energy delivery cartridge with a burst cap that allows controlled discharge of the propellant gases generated within said cartridge.
Metallic cartridges have been used to encapsulate solid propellants for many years. In recent years other materials have been substituted for the traditional brass, but the principles of operation remain the same: A projectile is seated in the open mouth of a cartridge case containing solid propellant. Ignition of the propellant is provided by percussive or electrical means. The burning propellant generates pressurized gas which forces the projectile out of the mouth of the case and then typically through a barrel bore.
A representative metallic cartridge design is found in the NATO 5.56×45 mm rifle cartridge. In that design, 24 grains of propellant are used to accelerate a 62 grain projectile to a velocity of 3100 feet per second. A more complex system is used where the intention is to accelerate a relatively large mass (relative to the amount of propellant involved) to a relatively low velocity. Such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,086,703 to Klein (1992). The Klein device is a low-velocity riot control projectile. A metallic cartridge is used to contain a charge of solid propellant in the base of the projectile. The propellant is held within the metallic cartridge by the seating of a disc over the top of the propellant (commonly called a “wad”). Such a cartridge—having no projectile other than the wad—is often called a “blank.” When the cartridge is fired, high pressure propellant gases expel the wad and the cartridge then vents the gases into the space beneath the projectile. The gases then force the projectile forward with respect to the metallic cartridge. The result is the creation of a high pressure chamber within the metallic cartridge and a low pressure chamber within the space behind the projectile—as the projectile moves forward to exit the weapon. Such a system is often referred to as a “Hi/Low” gas delivery system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,259,319 to Dravecky et.al. (1993) discloses another type of Hi/Low system. The Dravecky invention is a reusable practice round for 37 mm and 40 mm grenade launching weapons. It used a .38 caliber “blank” cartridge as the high pressure component (see
Traditional wads are capable of providing reliable ignition, but less than ideal for a Hi/Low system. Once the wad clears the mouth of the case, the pressure drop within the case is substantial. This fact causes most of the propellant gases to be expelled in a short period, and may also promote incomplete burning of the propellant. A system for metering the expulsion of the gases is therefore desirable. U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,729 to Richert discloses such a system. With respect to
The Richert device thus solves the metering problem and has the added advantage of not expelling a wad (since it has no wad). The expulsion of a wad is a decided drawback to the other devices. The wad tends to follow an erratic flight path and can strike unintended targets. In addition, many wads will accumulate in the area of a practice range introducing a pollution problem. However, the Richert device has the disadvantage of using unconventional components. The blank cartridge and the diffusing device must be specially manufactured, adding to the cost. The use of more conventional munitions components is preferable.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,712 to Lyon (2000) discloses a Hi/Low system using a standard .38 caliber cartridge. However, the .38 caliber cartridge is contained within a metal sleeve with a metering hole (see
Finally, the reader should be aware that Hi/Low gas cartridge systems are used in many fields other than munitions. As one example, consider U.S. Pat. No. 6,189,926 to Smith (2001). The Smith device uses a complex high pressure cartridge to vent propellant gases into a low pressure chamber. The low pressure chamber is then used to inflate an automotive air bag. The propellant containing case is designed to rupture—thereby venting the gas. A close inspection of the drawings reveals that the device is quite complex, and consequently quite expensive. It is therefore unsuitable for use in a projectile practice round. However, it does serve to illustrate the fact that cartridge gas venting systems have many different applications. These would additionally include, without limitation:
The present invention is a modified fluid delivery cartridge.
In operation, the propellant is ignited to produce pressure within the sealed case. This pressure builds steadily until the scribed cross in the burst cap ruptures. The propellant gases are then vented in a metered fashion through the ruptured burst cap. However, the burst cap is retained by the case so that no solid object escapes the high pressure cartridge. In addition, by carefully designing the shape of the burst cap and the components of the low pressure chamber, it is possible to create an efficient expansion nozzle to better meter the propellant gases.
Charge casing 28 extends upward from base 24. Bulkhead 60 closes the upper portion of charge casing 28. It is pierced by charge vent hole 52. Low pressure case 12 is typically formed as one integral piece—either as a metallic casting or as molded plastic.
Charge casing 28 and bulkhead 60 combine to form a structure to support blank cartridge 32. Blank cartridge 32 supplies high pressure propellant gases which are fed through charge vent hole 52 into low pressure chamber 30. Low pressure chamber 30 is formed by seating projectile body 14 into low pressure case 12. Projectile body 14 has a cavity in its base which tends to receive the hot pressurized propellant gases escaping from charge vent hole 52. Projectile body 14 is typically formed from a metal capable of withstanding the hot propellant gases. Nose cone 18 is bonded onto the top of projectile body 14. It contains dye charge 20, which ejects a dye marking at the point of impact, thereby allowing the operator to observe the fall of the shot.
In operation, practice round 10 is placed within a grenade launcher, which typically consists of a firing chamber connected to a short, rifled barrel. Once secured within the launcher, blank cartridge 32 is detonated. The ejection of propellant gases forces projectile body 14, along with nose cone 18 and the contained dye charge 20 through the rifled bore. Returning briefly to
Those skilled in the art will know that the placement of the powder charge within a case has a significant effect on the ignition and burning of the powder. The volume of powder used is set by the ballistic result required; i.e., within a reasonable range, more powder means more velocity to the projectile. It is often true that the powder charge required does not fill the volume of the case. This is particularly true with blank cartridges, since the bullet volume is unoccupied. If the powder is left free in the case, it may settle away from percussion primer 34, especially when the case is oriented horizontally. In such a situation, unreliable ignition may occur.
Looking at
Wad 40 is typically formed of heavy card stock, while filler plug 38 is often a softer material—such as an open celled foam. When the practice round is fired, wad 40 and filler plug 38 are ejected into the rifled bore. Most of the mass is ejected downrange. However, it is important to realize that wad 40 and filler plug 38 will be broken into smaller particles that intermingle with the very hot propellant gases. Some of these solids then become attached to the firing chamber and barrel wall (commonly called “fouling”). Such fouling tends to build up rapidly, requiring the frequent cleaning of the weapon.
In addition, while wad 40 does serve to keep the components oriented, it cannot withstand significant pressure. It is, in fact, a poor substitute for a bullet. In a conventional cartridge, the bullet's mass retards its forward motion and allows the pressure within the case to build gradually. In a blank cartridge such as shown in
The present invention produces a much more stable ignition and burn sequence, thereby producing more consistent velocities. In addition, the present invention eliminates the ejection of solid objects which can foul the weapon's bore.
Embossed lines 48 allow burst cap 46 to rupture in a consistent and predictable manner.
In order to facilitate a complete understanding, it is helpful to compare the entire ignition and burn sequences for the prior art blank cartridge and the present invention. The prior art follows the following sequence: (1) Ignition of the primer; (2) Propellant ignition with initial pressure rise; (3) Expulsion of the filler and wad with a consequent sharp pressure drop; (4) Erratic burning of the remaining propellant.
The present invention follows the following sequence: (1) Ignition of the primer; (2) Propellant ignition with initial pressure rise; (3) Additional pressure rise to promote complete ignition; (4) Rupture of the burst disk, creating a metering nozzle; and (5) Sustained burning at even and elevated pressure until the propellant is completely consumed.
Those skilled in the art will realize that the metering of the high pressure propellant gases through the throat created by burst cup 46 and charge vent hole 52 is similar to the expansion of burning gases through a rocket nozzle. It is therefore advantageous to optimize the shape of charge hole 52 to create more consistent expansion and acceleration of the gases. One optimum configuration for such a nozzle is known as a DeLaval nozzle.
Having reviewed the preceding, those skilled in the art will realize that the use of modified crimp 50 with modified blank cartridge 62 is not strictly necessary. Burst cup 46 can be placed within high pressure cartridge 42 and externally retained.
Although the invention has been primarily illustrated as a component in a projectile round, those skilled in the art will realize that the invention has many other applications.
Diffuser 68, which opens into a series of vent holes 70, is mated to low pressure case 66. Air bag cartridge 64 would typically be placed within an uninflated air bag. When the air bag must be inflated, an electrical signal is sent to ignite electrical primer 74. This action ignites the propellant, ruptures the burst cap, and causes a rapid but metered flow of gas into and through diffuser 68. The gas then escaping through vent holes 70 inflates the air bag.
The addition of neck 78 considerably reinforces the side walls of necked cartridge 76. This additional strength reduces the need for surrounding reinforcement of the cartridge.
Many additional applications are possible for the cartridge.
Projectile container 84 is hollow it is sealed at its upper end by cap 86, which interlocks with the side walls of projectile container 84. The container typically contains a payload to be delivered for some purpose. One example would be a flare attached to a parachute (sometimes called a “star shell”).
The operation of the device proceeds as follows: (1) The entire round is loaded into a firing chamber; (2) Percussion primer 34 in high pressure cartridge 42 is ignited; (3) The lower burst cup 46 ruptures, venting the pressurized propellant gases; (4) At the same time, the venting propellant gases ignite delay charge 90 in necked cartridge 76 (which burns slowly in a controlled fashion—for up to 5 seconds, or longer); (5) The venting propellant gases accelerate projectile container 84 down a rifled bore, sending it flying into space; (6) While projectile container 84 is arcing through its trajectory, delay charge 90 burns from the base of the cartridge up to output charge 92, whereupon it detonates output charge 92; (7) Output charge 92 ruptures he upper burst cup 46, throwing pressurized gases into the interior of projectile container 84; (8) Cap 86 blows free of projectile container 84; and (9) The contents of projectile container 84 (the “payload”) are ejected.
If a flare with attached parachute is the payload, the hot gases flowing from necked cartridge 76 can also be used to ignite the flare. The embodiment shown in
Although the preceding description contains significant detail, it should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but rather as providing illustrations of the preferred embodiment of the invention. Thus, the scope of the invention should be fixed by the following claims, rather than by the examples given.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
89563 | Daw | May 1869 | A |
99899 | Hotchkiss | Feb 1870 | A |
116094 | Powers | Jun 1871 | A |
148366 | Hobbs | Mar 1874 | A |
278394 | Bullard | May 1883 | A |
3728967 | Hinkle et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3771451 | Woodring | Nov 1973 | A |
3935816 | Boquette | Feb 1976 | A |
3983817 | Tucker | Oct 1976 | A |
4164903 | Bouza | Aug 1979 | A |
4370930 | Strasser et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4493263 | Carabateas | Jan 1985 | A |
4587905 | Maki | May 1986 | A |
4887674 | Galosky et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892038 | Lubbers | Jan 1990 | A |
4913054 | Petersen | Apr 1990 | A |
5078117 | Cover | Jan 1992 | A |
5086703 | Klein | Feb 1992 | A |
5259319 | Dravecky et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5341744 | Shi | Aug 1994 | A |
5353779 | Lyon | Oct 1994 | A |
5402729 | Richert | Apr 1995 | A |
5408931 | Tallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5429054 | Topping | Jul 1995 | A |
5493975 | Franzini et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5703322 | Tidman | Dec 1997 | A |
5834681 | DuBay | Nov 1998 | A |
5936189 | Lubbers | Aug 1999 | A |
6041712 | Lyon | Mar 2000 | A |
6189926 | Smith | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198718 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230733 | Strelow et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6328906 | Lundstrom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6532402 | Ostwald et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6619211 | Haeselich | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
302184 | Dec 1954 | CH |
3065 | Jan 1872 | GB |
253395 | Jun 1926 | GB |
WO 9323717 | Nov 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040000250 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |